Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华硕 Zenbook 14 OLED 评测--配备 120Hz OLED 和酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器、重量仅 1.2 千克的超轻型笔记本电脑
华硕的 Zenbook 14 OLED 是一款轻便小巧的超极本。2024 版配备了英特尔新的 Meteor-Lake 移动处理器，包括速度更快的 Arc iGPU，以及新的 120-Hz OLED 显示屏。
目前，新款 Zenbook 14 有三种配置可供选择：Core Ultra 5 125H、16 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 FHD OLED（60 Hz）；Core Ultra 7 155H、16 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 3K OLED（120 Hz）；Core Ultra 9 185H、32 GB 内存、1 TB SSD 和 3K OLED（120 Hz）。在测试时，我们的测试配置尚未上市。它配备 Core Ultra 7 155H、32 GB 内存和 3K OLED 显示屏。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.7 % | 02/2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 89 % | 01/2024 | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
12/2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | ||
| 88.9 % | 10/2023 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 87.4 % | 07/2023 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.3 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 | |
| 92 % | 08/2022 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" | 2560x1664 |
外壳 - Zenbook 采用金属外壳
新款 Zenbook 14 OLED 有蓝色（思索蓝）和银色（雾银）两种颜色，其设计与之前的 Zenbook 型号非常相似。低调的 Pro Art 徽标和小的 Zenbook 字样位于机盖上，后者也位于笔记本显示屏下方。除此之外，制造商没有采用任何其他设计元素（除了彩色的广告贴纸），总的来说，新款 Zenbook 相当保守。我们的蓝色测试设备上尤其留下了不少指纹印。侧面的边框非常纤细，但底部的边框却非常宽。
拿起设备的第一感觉就是它非常轻巧（1.21 千克）。由于采用了金属结构，它的稳定性依然很好，我们无法从它身上听到任何吱吱嘎嘎的声音。键盘的中间部分在用力按压时会有轻微变形，但这在日常使用中应该不成问题。显示屏盖也同样稳定，我们非常喜欢它的铰链。单手就能轻松打开盖子，放手时也不会晃动。其最大开启角度为 180 度。
在我们的对比组中，新款 Zenbook 是最轻的机型，同时也是最薄的 Windows 笔记本电脑。只有被动散热的 MacBook Air M2更薄。即便如此，Zenbook 仍能轻松放入每个背包，不会占用太多空间。65 瓦电源重 226 克。
连接性 - Thunderbolt 4，但没有读卡器
Zenbook 14 涵盖了所有最重要的连接标准，包括 USB-A、USB-C 和 HDMI。不过，USB-C 端口也用于为设备充电。说到这里，我们对 USB-C 端口的位置并不完全满意，我们希望它能位于机身背面的某一侧。此外，大多数连接都位于笔记本电脑的右侧。
交流
新款 Zenbook 14 没有 Wi-Fi 7 模块，而是使用了著名的英特尔 AX211 模块，支持 Wi-Fi 6。它与华硕参考路由器的传输速率非常好且稳定，我们在测试期间从未遇到过任何连接问题。
| Networking | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
| Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
网络摄像头
华硕在显示屏顶部边框安装了一个 1080p 网络摄像头，可提供不错的画质。此外，用户还可以使用一些工作室效果（柔焦、眼神接触、跟踪）。此外，它还配有一个机械盖和一个红外摄像头，可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。
维护
底盖由几颗 Torx 螺钉固定，可以轻松卸下（没有隐藏螺钉）。在内部，你可以接触到风扇进行清洁，也可以更换 M.2-2280 固态硬盘和电池。内存和 WLAN 模块是焊接上去的。
输入设备 - 1.4 毫米升降键盘
笔记本键盘的键程为 1.4 毫米，没有任何惊喜。键入时感觉舒适而精确，只有较大的按键声音稍大。总的来说，这是一款不错的键盘。另一方面，它的布局并不完全理想，因为方向键较小，而且只有一个单行回车键。白色背光有三个强度级别，可通过亮度传感器自动激活或关闭。
点击板（13 x 7.5 厘米）非常光滑，操作起来没有任何问题。下半部分可以向下按，但会发出响亮的 "咔嗒 "声。点击键盘右上方可弹出虚拟数字键盘。鼠标指针仍然可以移动，只是点击变得有些复杂。不过总的来说，数字键盘运行良好。
显示屏 - 120 赫兹 OLED
华硕新推出的 Zenbook 14 只配备了 OLED 面板--我们的测试设备配备了可选的 3K 版本（2880 x 1800 像素，16:10），刷新率为 120 Hz，但不支持触摸输入。主观而言，画质非常出色，除了绝对的黑色内容外，显示屏还能描绘出超级生动的色彩。此外，由于采用了 120 赫兹的刷新率，它的响应速度非常快，动作也非常流畅。亮度和色温可以自动调节。
它在 SDR 模式下的最大亮度平均为 392 cd/m²，由于黑值极低，最大对比度超高。与目前其他 OLED 机型不同的是，Zenbook 14 在 HDR 模式下的表现也非常出色--在这里，它在描绘小区域最大亮度时的亮度值高达 644 cd/m²，在显示全亮屏幕时的亮度值高达 620 cd/m²。不过，同样的 Windows 限制在这里也起了作用，因为它的 HDR 模式必须手动激活，然后色彩管理就不再起作用了。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 389 cd/m²
Contrast: 19550:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 CSOT T3 MNE007ZA1-3, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Samsung 134XK04, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40 | Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -18% | 0% | -16% | -0% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.8 | 71.1 -29% | 99.75 0% | 74.7 -25% | 99.7 0% | 98.4 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.7 -1% | 99.99 0% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.6 | 73.2 -25% | 98.56 1% | 75.8 -22% | 96.8 -1% | 87.6 -10% |
| Response Times | -4274% | -653% | -3318% | -153% | -4038% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.69 ? | 37.9 ? -5393% | 2.2 ? -219% | 32.2 ? -4567% | 2.18 ? -216% | 32.9 ? -4668% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.71 ? | 23.1 ? -3154% | 12.8 ? -1703% | 15.4 ? -2069% | 2.08 ? -193% | 24.9 ? -3407% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 300 -37% | 238.6 ? -50% | |||
| Screen | -129% | -125% | -189% | -114% | -241% | |
| Brightness middle | 391 | 340 -13% | 388 -1% | 402 3% | 361.7 -7% | 526 35% |
| Brightness | 392 | 338 -14% | 391 0% | 371 -5% | 367 -6% | 486 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 84 -14% | 98 0% | 86 -12% | 96 -2% | 87 -11% |
| Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.16 -700% | 0.0411 -106% | 0.27 -1250% | 0.38 -1800% | |
| Contrast | 19550 | 2125 -89% | 9440 -52% | 1489 -92% | 1384 -93% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.7 -55% | 6.32 -475% | 1.8 -64% | 4.83 -339% | 1.3 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.4 | 3 -25% | 8.82 -268% | 3.6 -50% | 9.34 -289% | 2.7 -13% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.9 -123% | 2.61 -101% | 1.8 -38% | 1.8 -38% | 2 -54% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% | 1.772 124% | 2.27 97% | 2.33 94% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6336 103% | 6729 97% | 6202 105% | 6695 97% | 6438 101% | 6858 95% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.3 | 4.79 | 1.5 | 3.97 | 0.7 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1474% /
-741% | -259% /
-212% | -1174% /
-630% | -89% /
-95% | -1428% /
-770% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）对面板进行了分析，标准的原生配置文件直接提供了良好的再现效果，尽管色彩有些过度饱和。另一方面，使用 P3 配置文件可以获得极为准确的色彩描绘，所有偏差都低于重要的偏差值 3。
通过自行校准，我们无法进一步改善显示器的显示效果。此外，如果你想在小色彩空间内编辑图片，可以选择非常精确的 sRGB 配置文件。该屏幕涵盖了全部 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.38 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.37 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.32 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
如果亮度为 80% 或更低，OLED 面板会使用频率为 480 Hz 的 PWM。不过，华硕在其 MyAsus 软件中提供了所谓的无闪烁 OLED 调光功能。
OLED 面板非常容易反光，尽管其亮度和高对比度有助于缓解这一问题，但即使在阴天，反光仍然是一个问题。除了 OLED 面板特有的蓝色光泽外，它的可视角度没有任何问题。
性能 - 英特尔流星湖处理器和弧形 iGPU
新款 Zenbook 14 OLED 只配备英特尔的 Meteor-Lake 移动处理器，包括其集成的 Arc GPU（Core Ultra 5、7 和 9）。它的内存是焊接的，你可以选择 16 和 32 GB LPDDR5x-7467 内存。
测试条件
在 MyAsus 软件中，制造商提供了三种不同的性能模式，也可以通过 FN+F 组合键进行选择。我们使用预选的标准模式（64/20 瓦）进行了以下测试。如果您需要更大的功率，也可以在连接电源时选择性能模式（64/28 瓦），但在我们看来，增加的性能并不能证明风扇的噪音（约 50 dB(A)）有多大。如果您喜欢特别安静，也可以选择耳语模式（45/15 瓦）。
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H
我们测试了新的 英特尔酷睿 7 155H(流星湖）进行了多次测试。由于英特尔砍掉了旧的 P 系列芯片，新的 H 系列芯片现在的 TDP 范围更广，从 28 瓦到 115 瓦不等，不过，制造商也在较低的功率限制下使用这些芯片。如果设备温度较低，Zenbook 14 可以在大约 20 秒内保持超过 60 瓦的高功率极限。之后，该值会越来越低，直到平衡后只有 20 瓦。因此，在短期基准测试和日常使用中，它的性能非常出色，但在长时间负载情况下，笔记本电脑的性能会大幅下降（在我们的 CB 循环中几乎下降了 50%）。它的单核性能总体不错，但比老款 Raptor Lake 芯片稍弱，与 AMD 的 Zen4 CPU 大致相当。在电池模式下，该处理器的最大功耗为 50 瓦，然后迅速稳定在 25 瓦，这就是其多核性能降低约 14% 的原因。更多 CPU 基准测试 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=27) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2485 - 16201, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1801, n=27) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (598 - 1934, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=25) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (810 - 6314, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (620 - 693, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (216 - 738, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1988 - 2858, n=29) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (514 - 2581, n=70, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (230 - 268, n=26) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (91.8 - 280, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (201 - 1600, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (178 - 349, n=23) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (42601 - 70074, n=25) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (16223 - 67444, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5037 - 5540, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2197 - 6403, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10696 - 13656, n=27) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6796 - 13217, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2003 - 3130, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (2287 - 2458, n=27) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=27) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4274 - 12580, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1689 - 1824, n=27) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (672 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=25) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1.5 - 19.4, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (40.1 - 120.5, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 58.9, n=25) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4397 - 1.236, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4609 - 0.516, n=25) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
* ... smaller is better
此外，我们还查看了 CPU 在其他性能模式下的表现，并在 Cinebench R15 多环测试中评估了封装功率。在这三种模式下，CPU 的性能都有所下降，但在 "耳语"模式下，CPU 的性能表现不错，足以应付日常使用中的短时负载。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test 2
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=25) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (43630 - 93181, n=25) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=25) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 93266, n=25) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10641, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (21052 - 47685, n=25) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=25) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=25) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=25) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=25) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，Zenbook 14 没有任何问题，总体而言，它是一款反应非常迅速的笔记本电脑。它在合成基准测试中的成绩也不错，我们在测试过程中没有遇到任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=17) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (9557 - 11214, n=17) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=17) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (4985 - 9999, n=17) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=17) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1291 - 1717, n=16) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=16) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (939 - 1700, n=16) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (255 - 299, n=17) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (241 - 263, n=13) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (520 - 565, n=17) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6527 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 95631, n=25) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=25) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64852 - 93451, n=25) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (125.8 - 173, n=25) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网上冲浪、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载），采用当前 BIOS 版本的 Zenbook 14 在一个驱动程序上出现了限制，但重要的 "中断到处理延迟 "值非常低。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
这款笔记本电脑配备了 Micron2400，这是一款 PCIe-4.0 固态硬盘，存储容量为 1 TB，用户首次启动设备后可自由访问 896 GB。虽然固态硬盘的性能适合日常任务，即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定，但与同类产品相比，它并没有显示出最佳效果。我们自己也略感惊讶，并多次重复测试，但结果没有任何变化。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
Meteor-Lake 处理器配备了新的 Arc iGPU，其中具有 8 个内核的快速型处理器与 Core Ultra 7 155H.英特尔近来几乎没有显示出 iGPU 的任何进展，而新的 Arc iGPU 可以与 AMD 的 Radeon 780M-至少在目前的合成测试中可以与 AMD 的 Radeon 780M 相抗衡。
遗憾的是，GPU 驱动程序目前仍存在一些问题，因为我们注意到，在大多数选择了高细节的游戏中，很多测试设备都出现了大量掉帧现象，例如最近评测的 惠普 Spectre x360 14当然还有 Zenbook 14 OLED。在华硕的情况下，你可以通过 MyAsus 软件调整分配的 GPU 内存，然后需要重新启动。基本上，数值是自动分配的，但你最多可以选择 8 GB。不过，这只能在短时间内起到帮助作用，因为即使增加了 GPU 内存，性能仍会出现明显波动，这也是目前几乎无法进行游戏的原因（尤其是高细节游戏）。我们还不清楚为什么只有部分测试设备会出现这种情况。
在游戏基准测试中，新的 Arc iGPU 无法证实其在合成测试中的良好表现，始终落后于 AMD 的 Radeon 780M。不过，我们认为这个问题会在未来的驱动程序中得到纠正，从而进一步提高游戏性能。在长时间负载和电池模式下，它的图形性能依然稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 9340 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6445 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3427 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (336 - 1548, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (301 - 637, n=18) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.01 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.24 - 50.1, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 86, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (29.4 - 109.1, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 | |
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 110.5 | 107.7 | 33.9 | 14.1 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 126 | 80 | 40 | 19.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 98.4 | 69.4 | 66.8 | 63.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 47.6 | 29.7 | 21.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.1 | 36 | 30.2 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 54 | 37 | 34 | 31 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 154.8 | 67.6 | 52.4 | 38.8 |
| F1 2021 (2021) | 143.5 | 73.9 | 56.4 | 26.9 |
| F1 22 (2022) | 73.1 | 62.2 | 46.7 | 11.9 |
| F1 23 (2023) | 73.1 | 59.5 | 37.6 | 10 |
排放 - Zenbook 风扇活动频繁
噪音排放
处理器的高功率极限给散热系统带来了巨大的挑战，用户需要为笔记本电脑的良好性能付出代价，即在短时间负载下风扇的大量运转。在空闲模式下，风扇甚至会开始转动，尽管呼呼的噪音并不令人讨厌。不过，在执行简单任务时，风扇的转速会加快，很快就会达到 33-40 分贝（A）。此外，在负载情况下，风扇也会开始脉动，这有点恼人。在性能模式下，我们测得的噪音高达 49.3 分贝（A），而在耳语模式下，我们测得的最大噪音为 31.6 分贝（A）。此外，我们的测试设备在执行几乎所有任务时都会发出电子噪音，尤其是来自固态硬盘的噪音，这意味着即使关闭风扇，你也无法真正安静下来。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 24.5 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.3 / 39.3 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -6% | -10% | -4% | |
| off / environment * | 23.4 | 23.5 -0% | 25 -7% | 24.5 -5% | 23.7 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.4 | 23.5 -0% | 25 -7% | 24.5 -5% | 24 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 23.4 | 23.5 -0% | 25 -7% | 24.5 -5% | 24 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.5 | 25.1 -2% | 26.2 -7% | 30.4 -24% | 24.4 -0% |
| Load Average * | 39.3 | 32.4 18% | 35.7 9% | 39.5 -1% | 37 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35.9 | 34.9 3% | 41.7 -16% | 42.1 -17% | |
| Load Maximum * | 39.3 | 37.3 5% | 45.5 -16% | 44.9 -14% | 42 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲模式下，Zenbook 14 的机箱仍然非常凉爽，但在高负载情况下，我们测得的温度超过了 40 °C，尤其是底部。热点位于后部中间区域，这意味着你仍然可以把笔记本放在大腿上。键盘也会明显发热，但在使用过程中不会造成任何限制。不过，考虑到 20 瓦的低功率限制和高风扇活动，这些表面温度还是太高了。在压力测试中，处理器在 20 瓦时的稳定速度比纯 CPU 负载时要快得多。在剩余时间内，该值也一直保持不变。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.8 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3 °C / -5.4 F).
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | -11% | -7% | -1% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 40.9 | 41.5 -1% | 36.5 11% | 45.8 -12% | 43.8 -7% | 44.7 -9% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 46.8 | 45.7 2% | 49.5 -6% | 42 10% | 44.4 5% | 44.6 5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 24.1 | 24.7 -2% | 25.5 -6% | 27.5 -14% | 24 -0% | 25.1 -4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24.6 | 24.9 -1% | 35 -42% | 27.1 -10% | 25.2 -2% | 25.3 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Zenbook 14 的音响系统给我们带来了惊喜，它的音质非常好，可以与最好的超极本相媲美。音效强劲有力，音域宽广，只是低音效果有限，考虑到它的构造，这也不足为奇。
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 动力十足的 Zenbook
耗电量
Zenbook 14 的 OLED 面板并不是效率最高的机型之一，在全 SDR 亮度下的功耗约为 10 瓦。在负载情况下，我们遇到了一个众所周知的问题：紧凑型笔记本电脑通常只配备 65 瓦的电源。当然，当处理器的功耗高达 64 瓦时，这个功率就不够用了。这个值不会保持很长时间，但在这种情况下（即使在日常使用中可能很少发生），电池总是需要短暂使用以满足电力需求。
| Off / Standby | 0.38 / 0.53 Watt |
| Idle | 6.1 / 10 / 10.3 Watt |
| Load |
53.3 / 67 Watt |
   
| |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40 | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.60 | Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -20% | -14% | 12% | -2% | 32% | -1% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.1 | 5.6 8% | 5.5 10% | 4.2 31% | 6.9 -13% | 1.9 69% | 4.96 ? 19% | 4.9 ? 20% |
| Idle Average * | 10 | 9.2 8% | 10.1 -1% | 7.4 26% | 7.4 26% | 9.6 4% | 8.01 ? 20% | 8.36 ? 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 9.7 6% | 11.2 -9% | 8 22% | 13.6 -32% | 9.7 6% | 12.8 ? -24% | 10.4 ? -1% |
| Load Average * | 53.3 | 65.2 -22% | 45.9 14% | 42.8 20% | 43.5 18% | 32.4 39% | 50.6 ? 5% | 45.9 ? 14% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | 70 -67% | 60.9 -45% | 47.9 -14% | 48 -14% | 30.8 27% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 67 | 101 -51% | 104.1 -55% | 76 -13% | 63.3 6% | 35.7 47% | 84.4 ? -26% | 66 ? 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
MyAsus 软件预设在电池模式下将显示频率降至 60 赫兹，这也是我们使用这些结果进行比较的原因。在 150 cd/m²（相当于笔记本电脑最大 SDR 亮度的 71%）的 WLAN 测试中，我们测得的运行时间接近 12 小时（120 Hz 时为 10 小时），而在全亮度下仍略低于 9 小时（120 Hz 时约为 7 小时）。与其他 Meteor Lake 设备的评测结果类似，它在 150 cd/m² 下的视频运行时间尤其出色，略低于 17 小时。即使是 MacBook Air M2也被击败（尽管其电池容量更小）。
全亮度 HDR 视频可持续 5 个多小时，这是一个不错的结果。设备完全充满电需要 130 分钟，约 72 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 75 Wh | Tuxedo Pulse 14 Gen3 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 60 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 65 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 2023 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 99 Wh | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -33% | -39% | 16% | -38% | 10% | -15% | |
| H.264 | 1010 | 595 -41% | 946 -6% | 794 ? -21% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 707 | 620 -12% | 479 -32% | 823 16% | 436 -38% | 884 25% | 629 ? -11% |
| Load | 134 | 72 -46% | 74 -45% | 115.4 ? -14% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - Zenbook 14 拥有大量光线和一个大遮光罩
在我们的测试中，新款 Zenbook 14 OLED 显示出了许多积极的特性，其中值得一提的就是它轻巧但依然稳定的金属外壳。它的 120Hz 3K OLED 显示屏也拥有出色的画质和准确的色彩配置文件，这意味着你可以轻松编辑照片和视频（P3 和 sRGB）。它的输入设备性能不错，连接选项包括所有重要的连接，如 USB-C、USB-A 和 HMDI 输出。不过，它的内存无法扩展。
这款笔记本电脑采用了全新的 Meteor-Lake 处理器，尤其是在短时负载峰值时性能卓越，但这是以高能耗为代价的。但在长时间负载情况下，其性能会下降不少，而且新的 Arc iGPU 在游戏时仍会出现一些驱动问题。固态硬盘的性能也相对较低，但在日常使用中你可能不会注意到这一点。即便如此，我们还可以做得更多。至少，它的优点包括较长的运行时间和令人印象深刻的扬声器。
出色的外壳、漂亮的屏幕、优秀的扬声器和良好的运行时间：新款 Zenbook 14 OLED 如果不是因为风扇过于紧张和电子噪音太大，可能会成为一款非常出色的笔记本电脑。
Zenbook 14 面临的最大问题是散热，因为尽管它的功率限制很高，但华硕只使用了一个风扇--当然，它的工作也很繁重。即使在播放视频或上网冲浪（使用一个标签页）等简单应用时，风扇也几乎总是跳动。此外，我们还注意到经常出现电子噪音（线圈呜呜声），总之，Zenbook 14 的声音实在是太大了。
价格和供应情况
新款 Zenbook 14 OLED 可直接从华硕在线商店购买，价格从1,299.99 美元起。.
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA
-
02/20/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
