Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar联想 Yoga Pro 7 14 笔记本电脑评测：英特尔 Arc 对决 Radeon 780M
如果您正在寻找一款小巧、快速的多媒体笔记本电脑，那么 Yoga Pro 7 将是您的不二之选。我们的评测版本是 14IMH9 型号，（虚拟）柜台售价约为 1300 美元。在这个价格上，你可以获得 32 GB DDR5 7467 内存（焊接；不可扩展）、1 TB M.2 固态硬盘和带触摸功能的超清晰 3K 面板（16:10、120 Hz、IPS）。不过，最吸引人的还是全新的流星湖 CPU：酷睿 酷睿至尊 7 155H酷睿至尊 7 155H 不仅在应用方面表现出色，在游戏和 3D 成像方面也有不俗的表现，这都要归功于相对强劲的 Arc iGPU。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 (Yoga Pro 7 14 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU - 128 MB VRAM, 31.0.101.5333
Memory
32 GB
, LPDDR5X 7467 soldered (no expansion)
Display
14.50 inch 16:10, 3072 x 1920 pixel 250 PPI, Multi-touch, Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, 1024 GB
, NVMe SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)
Weight
1.588 kg, Power Supply: 395 g
Price
1300 EUR
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
由于底盘与上一代基本相同 在本文中在本文中，我们将只简要介绍机箱、功能和输入设备类别。
Yoga Pro 7 14 的竞争对手有其他采用酷睿 Ultra 芯片的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，如 宏碁 Swift Go 14和 惠普 Spectre x360 14、华硕 华硕 ZenBook 14和内部生产的 联想 ThinkPad X1 Carbon与相应的 AMD 变体Yoga Pro 7。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.5 % | 03/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.6 kg | 16.6 mm | 14.50" | 3072x1920 | |
| 88.6 % | 01/2024 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
| 90.8 % | 02/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.1 kg | 14.96 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 86.7 % | 02/2024 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
| 91.4 % | 02/2024 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
12/2023 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.3 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 |
案例
这款全能型产品采用了时尚、高品质的金属机身，重量接近 1.6 千克，并不算是最轻的 14 英寸设备之一（例如，ThinkPad X1 重量仅为 1.1 千克），但它确实提供了良好的稳定性。180° 的开合角度非常大。
特点
端口
如果你可以不使用读卡器或 RJ45 端口，那么在端口选择方面你会发现有很多值得高兴的地方。Yoga Pro 7 14 有两个带 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort 功能的 USB-C 端口（1x Thunderbolt 4、1x USB 3.2 Gen.2）以及一个使用 3.2 Gen.1 标准的 USB-A 端口。此外，还有一个 HDMI 2.1 输出端口和一个音频插孔。由于所有端口都位于侧表面的后半部，因此使用鼠标不会有任何问题。
交流
英特尔无线电模块（Wi-Fi 6E AX211）在发送和接收数据方面的表现都相当出色，可以轻松赶上竞争对手。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1303 (605-1442)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1785 (1706-1883)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1002 (843-1098)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1638 (1574-1682)
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1631 (1520-1702)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1319 (961-1533)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1667 (1640-1685)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1702 (1687-1715)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1183 (848-1330)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1654 (1582-1688)
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE200 320MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1647 (1625-1669)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1440 (726-1755)
网络摄像头
无论是图像清晰度还是色彩准确度，内置的 200 万像素网络摄像头都能达到高于平均水平的图像质量。此外，还可通过电子快门轻松关闭摄像头。
5.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
配件
附带的 100 瓦 PSU 通过 USB-C 接口连接，体积非常小巧，重量（包括电源线）仅为 400 克。
维护
维护相当简单。拧松六颗 Torx 螺钉后，就可以将底板从固定处撬开（最好从后部开始）。设备内部有冷却系统（两个风扇和两个热管）、W-Fi 模块、电池和两个 M.2 插槽，其中一个还空着。
保修
在德国，联想规定保修期为两年。
输入设备
键盘
输入设备获得了良好的评价。首先是键盘，其布局合理，（除了中间的方向键）按键大小适中。输入体验也非常出色，尽管并没有让我们完全折服。得益于白色的两级灯光设置，在黑暗中也能成功打字。
触摸板
触摸板的尺寸为 13.5 x 8 厘米，表现尤为出色。其他方面也不差--无论是流畅的轻扫体验（光滑的表面）、精确度还是手势支持。只有点击区域还需要联想进行一些调整，因为我们觉得这个区域有些不稳定。
显示屏
AMD 评测机型配备的是 QHD+ 显示屏（2,560 x 1,600），而英特尔评测机型配备的是分辨率更高、3,072 x 1,920 像素的 3K 面板，在图像值方面有很大不同。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 481 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 455.8 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 464 cd/m²
Contrast: 1289:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.35
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.218
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Lenovo LEN145-3K (LEN8AAF), IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.50 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Samsung ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA ATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 ATNA40YK11-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -14% | 5% | 4% | 1% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.4 | 72.3 -27% | 99.7 1% | 99.8 1% | 99.8 1% | 99.75 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.99 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.9 | 73.4 -16% | 98.2 13% | 97.6 12% | 89.3 3% | 98.56 13% |
| Response Times | -62% | 96% | 97% | 97% | 53% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.1 ? | 43.6 ? -28% | 0.91 ? 97% | 0.69 ? 98% | 0.77 ? 98% | 2.2 ? 94% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 14.4 ? | 28.2 ? -96% | 0.76 ? 95% | 0.71 ? 95% | 0.75 ? 95% | 12.8 ? 11% |
| PWM Frequency | 240.3 | 480 ? | 480 | 300 | ||
| Screen | -56% | -27% | 184% | -17% | -171% | |
| Brightness middle | 464 | 357 -23% | 417 -10% | 391 -16% | 378 -19% | 388 -16% |
| Brightness | 456 | 348 -24% | 417 -9% | 392 -14% | 384 -16% | 391 -14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 98 9% | 98 9% | 97 8% | 98 9% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.22 39% | 0.02 94% | 0.0411 89% | ||
| Contrast | 1289 | 1623 26% | 19550 1417% | 9440 632% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 2 -122% | 1.26 -40% | 1.1 -22% | 1.4 -56% | 6.32 -602% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.32 | 3.8 -64% | 3.6 -55% | 2.4 -3% | 2.2 5% | 8.82 -280% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.35 | 1.2 -243% | 0.68 -94% | 4.79 -1269% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2.7 -93% | 1.3 7% | 1.3 7% | 1.7 -21% | 2.61 -86% |
| Gamma | 2.218 99% | 2.15 102% | 2.27 97% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 1.772 124% |
| CCT | 6669 97% | 6929 94% | 6355 102% | 6336 103% | 6256 104% | 6202 105% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -44% /
-48% | 25% /
1% | 95% /
129% | 27% /
9% | -38% /
-101% |
* ... smaller is better
第一个积极方面是色彩空间宽广。根据我们的测量，3K 版本的 AdobeRGB 和 DCI P3 分别为 73% 和 72%，而 3K 版本的 AdobeRGB 和 DCI P3 分别为 87% 和 98%。同样，响应时间也有所改善，有时甚至缩短了一半（从黑到白 14 毫秒，而不是 28 毫秒）。此外，3K 版本的亮度更高（456 cd/m² 对 348 cd/m²），但由于触摸屏表面为反光的亮面，在明亮的环境中会略显黯淡。如果需要，亚光显示膜会有所帮助。
AMD 机型的对比度稍好一些，因为 QHD+ 面板的背值较低。相比之下，所评测的英特尔版色彩更准确一些。开箱后，由于设备的出厂校准，色彩值处于理想范围。
可视角度是典型的 IPS 面板，换句话说，相当不错。与竞争对手的 OLED 面板不同，它不会出现显示屏闪烁的现象。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 30 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Yoga Pro 7 是市场上功能最强大的 14 英寸笔记本电脑之一（不含 dGPU）。32 GB 内存与 22 个并行 CPU 线程一样慷慨。有了 弧形 iGPU，英特尔消除了与 AMD 竞争对手（如 Radeon 680M或 780M.
测试条件
预装的联想 Vantage 软件有三种运行模式，但在我们的测试中，"智能散热 "和 "最高性能 "之间没有明显区别。不过，在 "省电模式 "下，该设备仍然比较安静，但性能有限。所有测量均使用 "智能散热 "模式记录。
| Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) | 省电模式 | 智能冷却 | 最高性能 |
| 噪音 | 32 dB(A) 38 dB(A) 38 dB(A) | ||
| 性能 | 12-27fps 28fps 28fps |
处理器
酷睿至尊 7 155H 的 CPU 性能包括 6 个性能内核（含超线程技术）、8 个效率内核和两个所谓的低功耗效率内核，可与 Ryzen 7 7840HS的 AMD 变体相当。在 Cinebench 循环测试中，我们很高兴地向大家报告，其性能保持稳定，这一点是其他许多酷睿 Ultra 设备所无法比拟的（见图）。一般来说，在基准测试结果方面，竞争对手稍显落后。
Cinebench R15 multi continuous test
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2490 (2449.93-2541.3)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2541 (2513.35-2580.81)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1920 (1441.75-2297.27)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Intel Core Ultra 7 155H; Standard mode: Ø1477 (1223.99-2297.13)
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø1426 (1363.09-2028.81)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2151 (2090.3-2474.79)
CPU Performance Rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.2 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (343 - 25961, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (43630 - 93181, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11867 - 111109, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (453 - 4646, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 93266, n=25) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15447 - 115300, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10641, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1223 - 14944, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (21052 - 47685, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6379 - 59053, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=25) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=25) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (270 - 1123, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=25) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (204 - 14018, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=25) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7622 - 53954, n=57, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
系统性能也与 AMD 的同类产品不相上下。在 PCMark 10 中接近 7000 分的成绩非常不错。总体而言，电脑运行非常流畅，反应灵敏。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=17) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4384 - 7428, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (9557 - 11214, n=17) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8890 - 11168, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=17) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6213 - 10279, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (4985 - 9999, n=17) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4093 - 9749, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=17) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (718 - 1876, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1291 - 1717, n=16) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (685 - 1829, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=16) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (776 - 2210, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (939 - 1700, n=16) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (652 - 1899, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (119.2 - 448, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (255 - 299, n=17) | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (241 - 263, n=13) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (67.2 - 325, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (363 - 1913, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (520 - 565, n=17) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6889 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 95631, n=25) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22781 - 95353, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=25) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23831 - 86433, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64852 - 93451, n=25) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (23474 - 93382, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (125.8 - 173, n=25) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.8 - 172, n=52, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
通常情况下，延迟并不完美。LatencyMon 工具发现了实时处理音频和视频时可能存在的问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
虽然 SK Hynix NVMe 固态硬盘没有自己的散热器，但正如我们的循环测试所示，M.2 硬盘仍能持续提供性能。而 AMD 版的三星固态硬盘在长时间负载时有时会出现性能大幅下降的情况。
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6997 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4974 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
414.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
389.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3846 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3170 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
65.47 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
136.2 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6214 (4814.03-6277.82)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4360 (3283.45-6659.72)
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6313 (5833.72-6895.23)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4784 (4418.73-4854.7)
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6620 (6247.5-6902.18)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 SK hynix HFS001TEJ9X110NA; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3223 (2898.68-3275.12)
图形卡
尽管要求更高的现代游戏仍然建议使用 dGPU，但英特尔 Arc 的性能还是相当可观的。在合成基准测试中，Arc 甚至能够领先 AMD 的 Radeon 780M，后者曾是 iGPU 领域的标杆。不过，值得指出的是，内存的时钟速度对 iGPU 的速度有很大影响，这也是为什么很多系统不能进行 1:1 比较的原因。除此之外，英特尔似乎在 GPU 驱动程序上做了大量工作。与其他使用旧版驱动程序的设备不同，在此期间，相对蹩脚的 Iris Xe Graphics G7不同的是，在游戏时几乎不会出现任何错误信息、崩溃或图形错误。为了进行基准测试，我们将 GPU 驱动程序更新到了最新的 31.0.101.5333 版本。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13904 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 156892 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37020 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8990 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4151 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
与合成测试类似，在游戏挑战方面，Arc 没有理由躲在 Radeon 780M 后面--事实上，情况恰恰相反。虽然 Yoga Pro 7 的原生 3K 解决方案在大多数情况下运行速度太慢，但只要将像素限制在 1,920 x 1,080（或 1,920 x 1,200），大多数游戏都是可以玩的--尽管是在预期的中低细节下。不过，与 Iris Xe Graphics G7 相比，这是英特尔在多年落后于 AMD 之后早该实现的巨大飞跃。
Performance Rating | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (14.5 - 28, n=19) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8 - 44.2, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5.01 - 67.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 | |
| Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (9.59 - 16.5, n=18) | |
| Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 | |
| Helldivers 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32.1 - 39.2, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (25 - 30, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (22.7 - 27.5, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Enshrouded | |
| 1920x1080 Performance | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (21.5 - 27, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Balanced AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18 - 22, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Quality AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Palworld | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:TSR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (34.8 - 40.6, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:TSR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32.6 - 37.1, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TSR | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU () | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (25.2 - 29.5, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown | |
| 1920x1080 Normal Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (208 - 215, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (183.9 - 208, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (128.6 - 142.8, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (127 - 142.8, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| Last Epoch | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (53.8 - 73.9, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (45.8 - 73.9, n=2) | |
| Asus TUF Gaming Advantage A16 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (39.1 - 52.4, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.7 - 52.4, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 | |
| Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (33.9 - 46.4, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (33 - 46.4, n=2, last 2 years) | |
为了了解 3D 性能在较长时间内的表现，我们测试了 的Witcher 3(FHD/Ultra）一小时。除了一次短暂的性能下降外，没有任何奇怪的现象。帧速率基本稳定。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores: Ø27.9 (19-30)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M: Ø30 (27-32)
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores: Ø19.2 (11-26)
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores: Ø20.9 (13-28)
Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores: Ø23.3 (22-26)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
| GTA V (2015) | 175 | 168.4 | 41.3 | 16.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 156 | 100 | 56 | 28 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 104.1 | 97.4 | 85.2 | 80.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 83.3 | 45.9 | 31.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 54.4 | 44 | 37.6 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 91 | 54 | 50 | 46 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 208 | 87.7 | 72.3 | 58.9 |
| Returnal (2023) | 37 | 36 | 32 | 28 |
| Atomic Heart (2023) | 61 | 44.1 | 30.9 | 22.2 |
| Company of Heroes 3 (2023) | 62.2 | 50.1 | 39 | 38.6 |
| Sons of the Forest (2023) | 29.8 | 21 | 19.4 | 18.7 |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023) | 39.6 | 30.5 | 26.7 | 18.4 |
| Atlas Fallen (2023) | 45.9 | 45.7 | 39.5 | 29.2 |
| Armored Core 6 (2023) | 50 | 40.1 | 36.2 | 32.2 |
| The Crew Motorfest (2023) | 32 | 30 | 25 | 21 |
| Lies of P (2023) | 56.9 | 48.1 | 41.7 | 33.2 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 111.1 | 84.5 | 52.1 | 31.8 |
| Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023) | 34 | 33 | 30 | 25 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 116 | 74.8 | 45.6 | 35.5 |
| Lords of the Fallen (2023) | 20.2 | 18 | 16.3 | 14.2 |
| Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) | 18 | 16 | 14 | 11 |
| The Finals (2023) | 99.5 | 68.9 | 60.5 | 46.4 |
| Ready or Not (2023) | 60.4 | 46.9 | 45.8 | 32.5 |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 208 | 142.8 | 134.2 | |
| Palworld (2024) | 40.6 | 37.1 | 29.5 | 27.3 |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 27 | 22 | 16.8 | 0 () |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 39.2 | 30 | 27.5 | 27.2 |
| Skull & Bones (2024) | 36 | 32 | 27 | 21 |
| Last Epoch (2024) | 73.9 | 52.4 | 46.4 | 40.3 |
排放量
噪音排放
风扇管理可谓差强人意。虽然在空闲模式下风扇经常静止不动，但在执行视频播放和打开浏览器等要求较高的任务时，风扇很快就会启动。相比之下，在负载情况下，英特尔版本往往比 AMD 版本更安静。这意味着我们在Witcher 3 平衡模式下测得的噪音只有 38 分贝（A），而不是 44 分贝（A）。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 27 / 30 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 36 / 38 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 7% | 5% | 14% | -1% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 24.3 -1% | 23.8 1% | 23.4 2% | 23.4 2% | 25 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 24.3 3% | 24 4% | 23.4 6% | 23.4 6% | 25 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 27 | 24.3 10% | 24 11% | 23.4 13% | 23.4 13% | 25 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 27.9 7% | 24 20% | 24.5 18% | 25.6 15% | 26.2 13% |
| Load Average * | 36 | 36.7 -2% | 31.5 12% | 39.3 -9% | 25.6 29% | 35.7 1% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38 | 44.2 -16% | 37.8 1% | 35.9 6% | 30.9 19% | |
| Load Maximum * | 38 | 44.2 -16% | 37.8 1% | 39.3 -3% | 32.6 14% | 45.5 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
同样，温度也不错。在满负荷运行一小时后，机箱某些位置的温度超过了 40 °C，不过在这种情况下是完全可以接受的。在空闲模式下，整个机箱的温度低于 30 °C，仍然凉爽宜人。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.7 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.4 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 30.7 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.3 °C / 0.5 F).
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -6% | -10% | 1% | 4% | -10% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 42.1 2% | 44.2 -3% | 40.9 5% | 39.3 9% | 36.5 15% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 42 | 49.7 -18% | 41.2 2% | 46.8 -11% | 45 -7% | 49.5 -18% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 25.7 -3% | 29.4 -18% | 24.1 4% | 23.8 5% | 25.5 -2% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 27.3 -5% | 31.2 -20% | 24.6 5% | 24 8% | 35 -35% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
引擎盖下的情况更糟。在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，处理器的温度超过了 100 °C，有时甚至更高。在Witcher 3 中，我们只记录到平均温度接近 70 °C。
发言人
作为一款 14 英寸的设备，Yoga Pro 7 的音质出奇地好，比大多数（同样较大的）笔记本电脑都要出色。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
考虑到所提供的功率，这些组件相当经济。空闲时的平均功耗为 5.5 瓦，低于 AMD 型号的 8.8 瓦。在Witcher 3 中，英特尔型号的功耗也较低（55 瓦比 71 瓦）。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / Watt |
| Idle | 4 / 5.5 / 11.8 Watt |
| Load |
66 / 100 Watt |
   
| |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | 5% | -8% | 34% | -17% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 5.6 -40% | 3.9 2% | 6.1 -53% | 3.2 20% | 5.5 -38% | 4.86 ? -22% |
| Idle Average * | 5.5 | 8.8 -60% | 5.8 -5% | 10 -82% | 4.2 24% | 10.1 -84% | 8.31 ? -51% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.8 | 9 24% | 16 -36% | 10.3 13% | 4.9 58% | 11.2 5% | 10.4 ? 12% |
| Load Average * | 66 | 58.5 11% | 46.1 30% | 53.3 19% | 40.5 39% | 45.9 30% | 46.3 ? 30% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55 | 71 -29% | 50.4 8% | 42 24% | 37.9 31% | 60.9 -11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 100 | 100.6 -1% | 67.4 33% | 67 33% | 68.6 31% | 104.1 -4% | 66.7 ? 33% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø55 (52.9-79.9)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø86.5 (50.8-101.4)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.49 (4.01-11.8)
Power consumption with an external monitor
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø73.9 (67.3-89.7)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø86.1 (84.3-87.5)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56 (54.4-76.1)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.2 (46-66.2)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.29 (2.81-6.91)
电池寿命
得益于适中的功耗，这款 14 英寸设备拥有惊人的续航能力--在不使用 PSU 的情况下也是如此。在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的 Wi-Fi 测试中，Yoga Pro 7 14 几乎达到了 11.5 小时，比 AMD 版多了约 1 小时，仅次于华硕 ZenBook 14。在电池续航时间方面，其他竞争产品无法与之匹敌。
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 73 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14APH G8 R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 73 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 57 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 75 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 68 Wh | Acer Swift Go 14 SFG14-72 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 65 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -9% | -31% | 4% | -18% | -30% | -7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 680 | 618 -9% | 466 -31% | 707 4% | 555 -18% | 479 -30% | 629 ? -7% |
| H.264 | 737 | 1010 | 999 | 794 ? | |||
| Load | 86 | 70 | 134 | 129 | 74 | 115.4 ? | |
| Reader / Idle | 1069 | 1252 ? |
Pros
+ 明亮且色彩准确的 3K 面板
+ 完善的输入设备
+ 优质机身
+ 电池寿命长
+ 雷电 4
+ 免费 M.2 插槽
Cons
- 显示屏非常光亮
- 没有读卡器
- 焊接内存
判决
自酷睿 Ultra 处理器推出以来，重视高速 iGPU 的用户不仅从 AMD 身上得到了实惠，现在又从英特尔身上得到了实惠。对于 iGPU 而言 超 7 155H 的弧加速器性能非常出色，至少与 Radeon 780M.
不过，Yoga Pro 7 14 并没有因此而变成耗电大户。除了功耗之外，电池续航时间也令人印象深刻，而坚固耐用的高级外壳更是一大亮点。如果不考虑光滑的表面，这款评测设备的触摸显示屏几乎不会有任何其他问题。3K 面板具有高亮度、宽广的色彩空间和出色的色彩准确度。
不足之处更多体现在细节上，无论是焊接内存还是读卡器的缺失。
总而言之，Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 获得了 "非常好 "的评价。
14 英寸的竞争产品也是一流的--从 华硕 ZenBook 14到 惠普 Spectre x360 14到 宏碁 Swift Go 14- 它们各有优缺点。
价格和可用性
在进行评测时，联想 Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9 目前在亚马逊或联想在线商店均无货。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IMH9
-
03/05/2024 v7
Florian Glaser
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.
Pricecompare
