小米红米本 Pro 16 2024 评测--也许是电池续航时间最长的流星湖笔记本电脑
如果不需要专用显卡,小米新推出的红米笔记本 Pro 16 将为多媒体用户和家庭办公提供一款功能强大的高品质 16 英寸笔记本电脑。铝合金机身内置强大的散热系统、英特尔最新的 酷睿至强 7 155H流星湖处理器(包括 Arc 图形处理器)、32 GB 内存、1 TB 大容量固态硬盘,以及亮度为 500 尼特、刷新率为 165 赫兹的哑光高分辨率 IPS 面板。
在德国,该设备可以通过 TradingShenzen 等渠道进口,售价为 997 欧元(约合人民币 1062 元),配备德国 Windows 11 Pro 版本(基本售价:957 欧元,约合人民币 1020 元)。另外,一款配备速度较慢的Core Ultra 5 125H 但其他配置完全相同的机型售价为 907 欧元(约合人民币 967 元)。
请注意,默认情况下,红米笔记本 Pro 16 预装的是中文版 Windows 11,不能更改语言。我们的测试机也是这种情况,这也是我们自己安装德语版操作系统的原因。因此,在购买前应确保获得正确的 Windows 版本。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.7 % | 04/2024 | Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.9 kg | 15.9 mm | 16.00" | 3072x1920 | |
85 % | 01/2024 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 18.4 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.9 % | 04/2024 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.5 kg | 12.5 mm | 16.00" | 2880x1800 | |
88.1 % | 12/2023 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores | 1.6 kg | 19.1 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.6 % | 10/2023 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
84.9 % | 02/2024 | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - RedmiBook Pro,坚固的铝合金外壳
小米为红米本 Pro 16 采用了银色铝合金外壳。底座两侧略微变薄,使设备看起来非常纤薄,不过它绝对不是想成为市场上最薄的笔记本电脑。凭借纤薄的显示屏边框,该机的设计看起来非常时尚,表面也不会留下指纹。得益于低调的外观,红米笔记本 Pro 在专业环境中使用也没有任何问题。
测试机的质量也给人留下了良好印象,做工没有任何瑕疵。机壳的稳定性整体也不错。只有在试图翘起机箱时,我们才能迫使它发出一些轻微的嘎吱声,键盘中心也能被压得很小。纤薄的显示屏盖子弹性稍差,但我们无法在显示屏上激起任何伪影。铰链调节良好,单手即可轻松掀起盖子。不过,在改变显示屏角度(最大开启角度约为 170 度)时,铰链仍无法完全防止显示屏轻微晃动。
就占地面积而言,红米笔记本 Pro 16 是我们对比组中较为紧凑的机型之一。它重约 1.87 千克(约 4.1 磅),比直接竞争对手略重。不过,红米 Pro 16 的厚度约为 1.6 厘米(约 0.63 英寸),也相对纤薄。连同 USB-C 充电线缆,140 瓦充电器重 382 克(约 13.5 盎司)。
设备 - Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI 2.1
接口分布在两侧的背面区域,无需接受任何妥协。除了一个 USB-C 端口外,还有一个 Thunderbolt 4 和一个 HDMI 端口。右侧提供了两个普通的 USB-A 端口,因此在日常操作中不需要任何适配器。不过,红米笔记本 Pro 没有配备读卡器或以太网端口。
交流
小米采用了当前的英特尔 AX211 WLAN 模块,该模块除了支持 Wi-Fi 6E 标准外,还支持蓝牙 5.3。不过,制造商似乎在天线方面偷工减料了,因为在我们使用华硕路由器进行的测试中,最大传输速率仅为 850-900 MB/s,仅相当于通常值的一半左右。根据网络连接的情况,你将无法充分发挥它的潜力,不过对于大多数用户来说,这种限制应该是最小的。
Networking | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
网络摄像头
1080p 网络摄像头是红米本 Pro 16 的另一个薄弱环节,因为即使在光线条件良好的情况下,成像质量也只能算一般。与 Meteor Lake 处理器相结合,工作室效果(如背景模糊效果、头部跟踪等)可由操作系统直接支持,与应用程序无关。
维护
底部的机箱盖用几颗 Torx 螺钉(T5)固定,可以顺利取下。机箱内部有两个插槽,可容纳紧凑型 M.2-2242 固态硬盘和一个可更换的 WLAN 模块。电池用螺丝固定,必要时可以更换,但工作内存是焊接的。
输入设备 - 带照明的优质键盘
红米笔记本 Pro 16 配备了黑色 Chiclet 键盘和三段式白色照明。键盘的质量给人留下了非常好的印象,提供了长键程和精确的输入体验,而且按键也不会发出咔哒声。因此,这是一款非常出色的键盘,与联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 16 的键盘相比,我们更喜欢它(评测即将发布)。虽然我们的测试机没有专门的数字键区,但有大尺寸方向键和专门的 PgUp/PgDn 键。电源键位于键盘区域外的右上方,还包括指纹传感器。
对于德国用户来说,唯一的问题是国际键盘布局。当然,您可以使用英文输入法,但这在使用元音等符号时会变得复杂。另外,您也可以选择德语布局,但这样您就必须记住按键分配(或许还可以在特殊按键上贴一些贴纸)。
大尺寸 ClickPad 的尺寸为 15 x 9.5 厘米(约 5.9 x 3.7 英寸),为输入提供了很大的空间,其滑动特性也非常好。在测试过程中,我们在输入方面没有遇到任何问题,如果非要抱怨什么的话,那就是按压键盘底部时发出的 "嗒嗒 "声稍大。
显示屏 - 3K IPS,165 Hz
红米笔记本 Pro 配备了一块 16 英寸超大 IPS 显示屏,分辨率为 3072x1920 像素,格式为 16:10。主观的图像印象非常好,内容看起来非常锐利,色彩也很鲜艳,当然 OLED 面板在这方面更具优势。但这也意味着红米笔记本 Pro 不会出现任何 IPS 闪烁。在明亮的图像区域,你可以察觉到一些微小的颗粒感,但你必须仔细观察才能发现,而且在日常操作中并不恼人。光晕问题不大,响应时间也不明显。由于采用了亮度传感器,图像亮度和色温都可以根据周围的光线条件自动调节。
最大亮度为 526 cd/m²,平均亮度为 510 cd/m²。黑色值略微偏高,为 0.35 cd/m²,但最大对比度仍然达到了很好的 ~1,500:1。它还支持 HDR 内容,但与 OLED 或迷你 LED 面板相比,最大亮度保持不变。
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 520 cd/m²
Contrast: 1486:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.1
ΔE Greyscale 4.3 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
89.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 TL160MDMP03_0, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 NV160WUM-NH0, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 ATNA60CL07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US AU Optronics B160QAN03.R, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -19% | 3% | -3% | 4% | 2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.8 | 66.7 -32% | 99.5 1% | 96.7 -2% | 99.9 1% | 99.93 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 96.5 -3% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.9 | 68.8 -23% | 97.5 8% | 84.6 -6% | 100 11% | 95.52 6% |
Response Times | -9% | 97% | -79% | 96% | 91% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 39.2 ? | 31 ? 21% | 0.64 ? 98% | 49.4 ? -26% | 0.57 ? 99% | 2 ? 95% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14.6 ? | 20.3 ? -39% | 0.68 ? 95% | 33.9 ? -132% | 1 ? 93% | 2 ? 86% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 238.8 | 240 | |||
Screen | -5% | 26% | -13% | 0% | 126% | |
Brightness middle | 520 | 349 -33% | 385 -26% | 473.6 -9% | 379.8 -27% | 370.4 -29% |
Brightness | 510 | 340 -33% | 391 -23% | 456 -11% | 383 -25% | 376 -26% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 80 -14% | 97 4% | 87 -6% | 98 5% | 96 3% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.24 31% | 0.19 46% | 0.02 94% | ||
Contrast | 1486 | 1454 -2% | 2493 68% | 18520 1146% | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 2.8 3% | 1.1 62% | 5.9 -103% | 4.7 -62% | 1.51 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.2 | 7.3 -18% | 1.8 71% | 9.37 -51% | 7.51 -21% | 2.89 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.1 | 0.7 36% | 0.89 19% | 0.55 50% | 3.36 -205% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 4.9 -14% | 1.4 67% | 7.3 -70% | 0.8 81% | 2.1 51% |
Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% | 1.9 116% | 2.22 99% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 7422 88% | 7328 89% | 6444 101% | 7260 90% | 6381 102% | 6536 99% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-9% | 42% /
32% | -32% /
-20% | 33% /
17% | 73% /
95% |
* ... smaller is better
在使用专业的 CalMAN 软件分析面板时,我们发现在交货状态下的校准并不理想。有明显的蓝色色调,色温也过低,有几种颜色偏离了目标值。不过,这些设置有助于提高最大亮度,因为校准后最大亮度从 520 cd/m² 降至约 490 cd/m²。另一方面,校准后显示屏的整体性能有了大幅提升。您可以从上面的链接下载相应的免费配置文件。不过,即使经过校准,100% 蓝光的高偏差仍然存在。因此,该设备并不适合图像处理,因为它也没有 sRGB 配置文件。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise | |
↘ 10.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.8 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17844 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
磨砂面板在户外表现出色,我们只希望在晴天时亮度能更高一些。IPS 面板的可视角度稳定性也不错。
性能 - Meteor Lake 和 32GB 内存
处理器 - Core Ultra 7 155H
红米笔记本 Pro 16 配备了全新的 酷睿至强 7 155H流星湖处理器。它有 16 个内核(22 个线程),性能内核的运行频率最高可达 4.8 GHz。我们测试设备的功率限制为 90/45 瓦,因此整体性能非常不错。性能 MateBook D16配备了 酷睿 i9-13900H在整体上略胜一筹,但这主要归功于其更好的单核性能。基本上,新款流星湖处理器的性能只是略逊于旧款猛禽湖处理器。
在持续负载情况下,多核性能下降约 15%。在电池工作状态下,处理器允许消耗 85/35 瓦,这也是多核性能降低约 13% 的原因。您可以在 技术部分.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9769 - 19007, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1496 - 1801, n=28) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3798 - 7409, n=26) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (620 - 693, n=26) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1988 - 2858, n=30) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (230 - 268, n=27) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (178 - 349, n=24) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (42601 - 70074, n=26) | |
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5037 - 5540, n=26) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (8656 - 21264, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10696 - 13656, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (2320 - 3157, n=31, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (2287 - 2459, n=28) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (10017 - 13556, n=28) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1689 - 1824, n=28) | |
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (9.93 - 21.2, n=26) | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (40.9 - 58.9, n=26) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (0.4609 - 0.516, n=26) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | |
Average of class Multimedia |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (6670 - 18470, n=26) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (43630 - 93181, n=26) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (1940 - 4436, n=26) | |
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64698 - 93266, n=26) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (5639 - 10647, n=26) | |
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (21052 - 47685, n=26) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (45713 - 152179, n=26) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (557 - 1250, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (3569 - 9802, n=26) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (32719 - 54223, n=26) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
系统性能
我们的测试设备在合成系统基准测试中表现出色,我们的主观性能印象也非常高。在测试过程中,我们没有发现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (5159 - 7529, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (9557 - 11289, n=18) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (7822 - 10591, n=18) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (4985 - 9999, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1366 - 1903, n=18) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1291 - 1717, n=17) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (1519 - 1929, n=17) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (939 - 1700, n=17) |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (171.4 - 432, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (255 - 299, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (241 - 263, n=14) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (133.2 - 348, n=71, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Multimedia (363 - 1016, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (517 - 565, n=18) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 6994 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (62397 - 95631, n=26) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (60544 - 90647, n=26) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (64852 - 93451, n=26) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H (125.8 - 173, n=26) | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网、播放 4K YouTube 视频、CPU 负载)中,我们的测试设备在使用当前 BIOS 版本的实时音频应用程序时没有受到任何限制。尽管有一个驱动程序显示出一些轻微的延迟,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值仍然很低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US |
* ... smaller is better
存储解决方案
小米为我们的测试机配备了一块来自中国制造商 YMTC 的短 M.2-2242 固态硬盘。PC300 的存储容量为 1 TB,固态硬盘在交付状态下进行了分区。首次启动后,用户在系统盘上仍有 137 GB 的可用空间(D 盘为 757 GB)。虽然这是 PCIe 4.0 硬盘,但传输速率更接近 PCIe 3.0 水平。但这在日常操作中并不会造成什么问题,即使在持续负载的情况下,性能也能保持完全稳定。此外,还有一个额外的 M.2-2242 插槽可用于存储扩展。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
新的流星湖处理器还包括新的 Arc 图形处理器.与 Core Ultra 7 155HiGPU 当然也受益于快速工作内存(LPDDR5x-7467)。红米本 Pro 16 的性能非常出色,是我们迄今测试过的最快的 Arc iGPU 之一。在基准测试中,我们完全没有发现掉帧的问题,而一些竞争对手(尤其是功耗更低的 Meteor Lake CPU)仍然存在这种情况。
在合成测试中,AMD AMD Radeon 780M可以超越,但在实际游戏基准测试中,780M 的快速版本仍有一些优势。但我们认为,这种情况仍会随着未来的更新而有所改善。许多老游戏都可以在高分辨率下以 1080p 舒适地运行,甚至目前的一些游戏,如《赛博朋克 2077》,也可以在低分辨率下相当流畅地运行。如果可能,您应该使用升频来进一步提高性能。例如,在 1080p 的低细节条件下,使用激活的 XeSS 可以将性能从 34.7 FPS 提高到 42 FPS。
在持续负载和电池运行的情况下,图形性能保持完全稳定。更多 GPU 基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 13729 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9001 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4042 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU (301 - 637, n=19) | |
Average of class Multimedia (190 - 1374, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years) | |
MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U | |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 | |
Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 |
The Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 171.5 | 164.4 | 41.2 | 15.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 157 | 97 | 57 | 25.1 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.4 | 96.9 | 83 | 79.8 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 84.1 | 45 | 30.6 | 23 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56.1 | 40.1 | 32.4 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 84 | 52 | 48 | 45 | 32 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 205 | 84 | 64 | 53 | 42 |
F1 23 (2023) | 80.1 | 74.2 | 50.4 | 14 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 34.7 | 29.5 | 25 | 21.2 |
排放 - 风扇噪音低,冷却效果好
噪音水平
小米采用了强大的散热系统,包括两个风扇和两个热管。在日常运行中,风扇经常保持关闭状态或非常安静地运行。此外,风扇曲线调整得很好,尽管处理器的功率限制很高,但一些短时间的负载峰值并不会立即导致风扇转速上升。即使在负载情况下,设备总体上仍然非常安静,尤其是在游戏(根据 CPU 负载情况约为 31-35 dB(A))或纯 CPU 负载情况下。只有在 CPU/GPU 合并负载的压力测试中,由于处理器的功耗高达 115 瓦,风扇的声音才会短暂变大,最高达到 39.7 分贝(A)。但当功耗再次降低时,风扇噪音也会下降到 38 分贝(A)左右。基本上,在完成负载阶段后,风扇也会迅速停止工作。我们的测试设备中没有其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.4 / 24.4 / 24.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32 / 39.7 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.4 dB(A) |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, YMTC PC300-1TB | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Arc 8-Cores, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | -10% | -16% | -11% | -13% | |
off / environment * | 24.4 | 23.2 5% | 24.6 -1% | 24.5 -0% | 23.4 4% | 25.3 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.4 | 23.2 5% | 24.6 -1% | 24.5 -0% | 24.1 1% | 25.3 -4% |
Idle Average * | 24.4 | 23.2 5% | 24.6 -1% | 26.3 -8% | 24.3 -0% | 25.3 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.4 | 24 2% | 26.4 -8% | 26.3 -8% | 28 -15% | 25.3 -4% |
Load Average * | 32 | 28 12% | 40 -25% | 36.5 -14% | 41 -28% | 43.5 -36% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.6 | 31.9 -4% | 40 -31% | 46.3 -51% | 40.9 -34% | |
Load Maximum * | 39.7 | 36.2 9% | 40 -1% | 52.9 -33% | 40.9 -3% | 50.75 -28% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在空闲运行和低负载情况下,金属外壳仍然非常凉爽,即使在负载情况下也没有问题。虽然底部有一个热点,温度高达 46 °C(115 °F),但这是在背面的中央区域,因此即使这样,你仍然可以把设备放在大腿上。键盘区域的温度保持在 40 °C(104 °F)以下,尤其是掌托,即使在高负载情况下也几乎不会发热。
如前所述,酷睿至尊 7 155H 在 CPU/GPU 综合负载下的功耗最高可达 115 瓦,但几分钟后功耗会降至 45 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.7 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.1 °C / 80.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+1.7 °C / 3 F).
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | 6% | -1% | -8% | -39% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 40.3 | 40.3 -0% | 40.9 -1% | 48.8 -21% | 41.6 -3% | 51.5 -28% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.9 | 45.1 2% | 42.6 7% | 47.6 -4% | 46.6 -2% | 62.4 -36% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.3 | 26.6 -1% | 24.5 7% | 24.2 8% | 30.4 -16% | 41.7 -59% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.9 | 27.1 3% | 24.8 11% | 23.6 15% | 31 -11% | 37.2 -33% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
红米笔记本 Pro 16 的立体声扬声器给人留下了良好的印象。尽管也有音效更好的多媒体笔记本电脑,但它们的价格也要贵得多。但我们的测试机依然毫不逊色,其音效与三星 三星Galaxy Book4 Pro为例(价格是后者的两倍)。
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 超长电池寿命
耗电量
我们对功耗的测量没有出现意外,空闲运行时的最大功耗为 12 瓦,考虑到良好的亮度值,我们的测试设备相当高效。在压力测试开始时,最大功耗为 140.6 瓦,之后在 102 瓦左右趋于平稳,在继续测试时为 78 瓦。值得肯定的是,小米没有在充电器上偷工减料,使用了 140 瓦的适配器,因此即使在压力测试期间也无需使用电池。此外,这是一款现代的 GaN 充电器,体积也非常小巧。充电器本身采用美国插头,但也随附了一个欧盟适配器。
Off / Standby | 0.56 / 0.64 Watt |
Idle | 4.2 / 11.6 / 12.3 Watt |
Load |
61.9 / 140.6 Watt |
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, YMTC PC300-1TB, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00 | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 321JN1024GB-TX01, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 16.00 | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N, OLED, 3200x2000, 16.00 | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.60 | Average Intel Arc 8-Cores iGPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 15% | 34% | 10% | 2% | -9% | 15% | -21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 4.7 -12% | 3.6 14% | 3 29% | 7.1 -69% | 5.73 -36% | 4.69 ? -12% | 7.27 ? -73% |
Idle Average * | 11.6 | 9.5 18% | 5.7 51% | 9.5 18% | 10.1 13% | 14.5 -25% | 7.91 ? 32% | 11.8 ? -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.3 | 10.1 18% | 6.1 50% | 12 2% | 18.6 -51% | 15.6 -27% | 12.4 ? -1% | 14.5 ? -18% |
Load Average * | 61.9 | 49.7 20% | 52.5 15% | 68.3 -10% | 45.3 27% | 40.5 35% | 52.4 ? 15% | 77.6 ? -25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57 | 60 -5% | 46.6 18% | 59.8 -5% | 39.5 31% | 74.9 -31% | ||
Load Maximum * | 140.6 | 66.3 53% | 64.7 54% | 104.8 25% | 52.9 62% | 94 33% | 84.7 ? 40% | 120.9 ? 14% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption With External Monitor
电池寿命
红米笔记本 Pro 16 的电池容量为 99 瓦时,续航时间极长。在 WLAN 测试中,只有 微星威望 16(在 WLAN 测试中仅被微星 Prestige 16 超越(但它的显示屏分辨率也较低)。使用 150 cd/m²(相当于测试机最大亮度的 60%)和 60 Hz 的亮度,我们的测试机在 WLAN 测试中实现了 16:23 小时(165 Hz 时为 13:46 小时)的超长运行时间。在全亮度条件下,面板的耗电量增加,电池寿命在 60 Hz 时减少到 9:39 小时(165 Hz 时为 9 小时),这仍然是一个非常好的结果。视频测试再次显示了全新 Meteor Lake 处理器的优势,在 150 cd/m² 的条件下,视频可播放近 22 小时。在负载最差的情况下(最大亮度),2 小时多一点就会熄灭。在设备开启的情况下,完整的充电过程需要 89 分钟,43 分钟后即可获得 80% 的电量。
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 99 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Pro 16 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 76 Wh | MSI Prestige 16 B1MG-001US Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Cores, 99.9 Wh | Acer Swift Edge SFE16 Ryzen 7 7840U R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 54 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -33% | -22% | 23% | -66% | -13% | -37% | |
H.264 | 1308 | 835 -36% | 1144 -13% | 537 -59% | 714 ? -45% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 983 | 674 -31% | 644 -34% | 1100 12% | 336 -66% | 510 -48% | 572 ? -42% |
Load | 124 | 83 -33% | 100 -19% | 166 34% | 209 69% | 95.7 ? -23% |
Pros
Cons
评语:红米本 Pro 16 是一款出色的多媒体笔记本电脑
新款小米红米笔记本 Pro 16 在我们的测试中给人留下了非常好的印象(不仅是相对于其价格而言),这款多媒体笔记本电脑甚至完全不需要躲避更昂贵的设备。坚固耐用的高品质铝制外壳、没有任何偷工减料的连接设备、按键行程长且按压点准确的键盘也非常舒适。哑光 IPS 面板也给人留下了深刻印象,主观画质好、亮度高,165 Hz 的频率也能带来流畅的显示效果。但它仍需经过校准才能达到最佳性能,遗憾的是没有 sRGB 配置文件。99 瓦时电池的续航时间非常出色。
性能方面的好消息还在继续,因为这是迄今为止我们测试过的最好的 Meteor Lake 实现之一。功率限制非常高,仅为 90 瓦,但这当然会带来很高的性能。尽管如此,在负载峰值时,散热也不会立即启动。全新 Arc iGPU 的图形性能也非常出色,并得益于快速工作内存。
高品质的机箱、舒适的键盘、快速的处理器、32 GB 内存、超长的电池续航时间以及非常出色的 IPS 显示屏:如果你不需要专用显卡,小米红米笔记本 Pro 16 是最好的多媒体笔记本之一。不到 1,000 欧元(约合 1,066 美元)的价格,整套配置几乎无可匹敌。
就缺点而言,有几个方面,但并不严重。WLAN 性能出乎意料地低,这可能会导致 1 GB/s 的高速互联网连接受到一些小限制。此外,网络摄像头的质量可以稍好一些,ClickPad 的咔哒声也有点大。不过,这些都是非常高级别的抱怨。工作内存是焊接的,但有了 32 GB 内存,这应该不是太大的限制。当然,对于德国用户来说,美式键盘布局可能也是一个问题,但你可以习惯它,或者在特殊按键上贴一些贴纸来补救。
与竞争对手相比,红米笔记本 Pro 16 在大多数方面都做得更好,而且考虑到不到 1,000 欧元(约合 1,066 美元)的价格,其整体配置几乎无可匹敌。目前,我们还在测试联想 IdeaPad Pro 16,它也配备了 酷睿至尊 7 155H.但它的价格更高,尤其是在图像质量方面,IdeaPad 无法与红米笔记本 Pro 16 相提并论。
价格和供应情况
例如,您可以从TradingShenzen 购买红米本 Pro 16,价格约为 1059 美元(包括英文版 Windows Pro)。
Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 16 2024
-
04/21/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.