结论华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 - 紧凑型工作站的多功能解决方案
在测试中,华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 被证明是一款小巧、多功能的迷你 PC,既适合日常办公使用,也适合要求更高的场景。凭借 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350,它将 CPU、GPU 和 NPU 性能稳固地结合在一起,为多任务处理、媒体播放和支持 AI 的工作流程提供了充足的储备。支持 DDR5 内存、快速 PCIe 固态硬盘和 USB4 等现代接口,在扩展和连接外部设备时具有高度灵活性,这一点尤其值得肯定。
在日常使用中,PN54 的稳定性能给人留下了深刻印象。集成的 Radeon 860M 足以满足办公应用、多媒体甚至轻度游戏的需求。但在现代游戏中,它很快就达到了极限。在这种情况下,USB4 接口至少可以提供连接外置 GPU 的选项,从而大大提高图形处理性能。
主要的批评意见是 DPC 延迟。此外,在负载情况下还会听到风扇噪音,不过在日常使用中不会造成干扰。另一方面,适中的能耗、稳定的外壳结构和 VESA 安装选项的扎实做工都是值得肯定的。不容忽视的是华硕良好的更新供应。在这方面,来自远东的多功能竞争对手往往跟不上。不过,华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 的建议零售价为 1,100 美元,比本次测试中的大多数同类设备都要贵得多。
Pros
Cons
华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 的目标用户是那些希望拥有一台小巧但功能强大的迷你 PC 的用户。该设备基于 AI-300 系列的 AMD Ryzen 处理器。尽管尺寸不大,但 PN54 提供了许多接口和快速的 DDR5 内存。在本测试中,我们将了解配备 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 和 32 GB DDR5 内存的 ExpertCenter PN54 的主要功能。此外,PN54 还可配备 AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 和 16 GB DDR5 内存。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能
华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 采用简洁的矩形设计,看起来既现代又实用。它的高度约为 34 毫米,结构紧凑,与大多数同类产品相比甚至略小。外壳由塑料和金属组合而成。底部用作维护挡板,由金属制成,而塑料外壳则由内部金属框架加固。
华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 配备了众多外部接口,分布在机身前后。尤其是 USB 端口的数量非常多。显示器连接有 HDMI、DisplayPort 和 USB-C,每种接口都支持 4K(3,840 × 2,160),最低 120 Hz。如果通过 USB-C 使用 DisplayPort,还能以 144 Hz 的频率使用 4K。
Connectivity - USB 3.x / USB4 / TB - AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Average of class Mini PC (906 - 3906, n=24, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
维护
华硕 PN54 可以在不使用工具的情况下打开,这样就可以快速安装内存和固态硬盘。在我们的测试样品中,还有空间安装 M.2-2280 格式的额外数据载体。散热垫已经包含在内,这也为设置硬件节省了一些时间。
可持续性
制造商没有提供有关 CO₂ 足迹的详细信息。不过,可向制造商索取 CO₂ 报告。华硕 PN54 将获得 EPEAT Gold 和能源之星标准认证。
性能
测试条件
对华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 的所有测试都是在交货状态下进行的,这意味着没有对处理器的 TDP 限制或风扇控制进行任何更改。不过,华硕提供了大量选项,可根据自己的需求定制 PN54。
处理器
由于采用了 Zen 5 架构,华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 中的 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 可提供较高的单核心和多核心性能。在性能比较中,AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 的性能大约相当于华硕专家中心 PN54 中的 AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS。 Geekom A8 Max.英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 285H 的性能略高,这可以从 GMK EVO-T1可以看出。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo |
WinRAR - Result | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance Physics | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Multi CPU) | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
SPECworkstation 4.0 - CPU Score | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Average of class Mini PC |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Average of class Mini PC (769 - 82725, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Average of class Mini PC (4140 - 227429, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Average of class Mini PC (290 - 9413, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (8186 - 184747, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Average of class Mini PC (408 - 31563, n=111, last 2 years) | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Average of class Mini PC (2088 - 121827, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Average of class Mini PC (3691 - 325960, n=111, last 2 years) | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Average of class Mini PC (77.4 - 2431, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Average of class Mini PC (432 - 42272, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Average of class Mini PC (5333 - 94026, n=111, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
系统性能
华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 在日常使用中性能卓越。凭借 DDR5 内存和快速 PCIe 固态硬盘,系统运行流畅,几乎没有明显的延迟。与竞争对手相比,该设备性能稳定,只有在人工智能性能方面,配备专用 NPU 的芯片才具有优势。
WebXPRT 4: Overall
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Average of class Mini PC (8377 - 154332, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Average of class Mini PC (8974 - 123483, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Average of class Mini PC (8762 - 216693, n=111, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Average of class Mini PC (44.9 - 184.8, n=111, last 2 years) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo |
* ... smaller is better
UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer NPU | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN (AMD Ryzen AI) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (AMD Ryzen AI) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (OpenVINO) | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (OpenVINO) |
UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer GPU | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Windows ML) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Windows ML) | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H (Windows ML) | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo (Windows ML) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN (Windows ML) |
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Average of class Mini PC |
* ... smaller is better
持续读取负载DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器和游戏性能
AMD 已明显改善了当前一代 Ryzen 的集成显卡。配备 512 个着色器单元的 Radeon 860M 可在华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 中运行。在 TDP 允许的情况下,Radeon 780M 和 890M 以及英特尔的 Arc Graphics 140T 可以提供更高的性能。860M 只能满足分辨率和细节水平较低的现代游戏的需求。
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo |
Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo |
SPECworkstation 4.0: Graphics Score | Accelerator Score | Viewport Graphics | HandBrake | ONNX Inference
Performance Rating | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
SPECworkstation 4.0 / Graphics Score | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 |
SPECworkstation 4.0 / Accelerator Score | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
SPECworkstation 4.0 / Viewport Graphics | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
GMK EVO-T1 |
SPECworkstation 4.0 / HandBrake | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) |
SPECworkstation 4.0 / ONNX Inference | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN, AMD Radeon 860M Ryzen AI 7 350 | Minisforum AI X1 Pro, AMD Radeon 890M Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS, AMD Radeon 780M R7 8845HS | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T Ultra 9 285H | GMK EVO-T1, Intel Arc Graphics 140T Ultra 9 285H | BOSGAME M4 Neo, AMD Radeon 780M R7 7840HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | 16% | 18% | -29% | -40% | 19% | 39% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 14.8 | 15.2 3% | 12.7 -14% | 7.08 -52% | 7.02 -53% | 17.4 18% | 13.5 ? -9% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 15.6 | 15.5 -1% | 21.2 36% | 7.94 -49% | 7.4 -53% | 22.5 44% | 22.1 ? 42% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 26.8 | 34.1 27% | 34.9 30% | 26.7 0% | 19.9 -26% | 31.1 16% | 39.4 ? 47% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 20.1 | 23.1 15% | 25 24% | 14.6 -27% | 12.8 -36% | 24.9 24% | 25.2 ? 25% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 18 | 21.9 22% | 21.4 19% | 17.8 -1% | 14.6 -19% | 20.9 16% | 35.5 ? 97% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 53.4 | 68.7 29% | 66.2 24% | 6.81 -87% | 6.13 -89% | 61.9 16% | 43.5 ? -19% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 46.5 | 55.9 20% | 50.2 8% | 51.3 10% | 44.9 -3% | 47.6 2% | 89.9 ? 93% |
3DMark 05 Standard | 68868 points | |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 40809 points | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 39142 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11140 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 168030 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31650 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6419 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3476 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2966 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 424 points | |
Help |
GTA V | |
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1920x1080 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
1920x1080 High Preset (FSR off) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1280x720 Low Preset AA:SM | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN |
30 分钟赛博朋克 2077》帧数表(1920 x 1080,超预设,FSR 关闭)
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 170.9 | 164.3 | 66.6 | 27.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 143.3 | 90.9 | 45.6 | 28.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 173.6 | 136.5 | 90 | 79.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 75.7 | 36.4 | 25.6 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 79 | 61.9 | 50.2 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 153 | 60.3 | 50.7 | 42.8 |
The Witcher 3 v4 (2023) | 52.1 | 40.2 | 33.9 | 28.1 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 35.3 | 26.8 | 21.6 | 21.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 38.7 | 29.5 | 22.8 | 19 |
F1 24 (2024) | 73.9 | 66 | 48.2 | 11.4 |
F1 25 (2025) | 68.1 | 52.9 | 41.9 |
使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 通过 USB4 对华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 进行性能检查
华硕 ExpertCenter PN54 支持 USB4,因此可以连接外置显卡。与 RTX 4090 等功能强大的 eGPU 相结合,图形性能可显著提高。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
3DMark | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Unigine Superposition | |
1280x720 720p Low | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
1920x1080 1080p High | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) |
Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Extreme Preset DX11 | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
ComputeMark v2.1 | |
1024x600 Normal, Score | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
1280x720 Low Preset (FSR off) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
GMK EVO-T1 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN, AMD Radeon 860M Ryzen AI 7 350 | Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN, Ryzen AI 7 350 | Geekom A8 Max (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) , R7 8845HS | GMK EVO-T1, Ultra 9 285H | Bosgame M4 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) , R7 7840HS | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPECviewperf 2020 | 405% | 441% | 481% | 527% | 39% | |
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 14.8 | 41.3 179% | 42 184% | 43.1 191% | 43 191% | 13.5 ? -9% |
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 15.6 | 138 785% | 138 785% | 93.7 501% | 138 785% | 22.1 ? 42% |
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 26.8 | 103 284% | 112 318% | 109 307% | 117 337% | 39.4 ? 47% |
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 20.1 | 81 303% | 82.2 309% | 82.1 308% | 84.6 321% | 25.2 ? 25% |
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 18 | 137 661% | 153 750% | 212 1078% | 211 1072% | 35.5 ? 97% |
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) | 53.4 | 29.4 -45% | 33 -38% | 38.8 -27% | 38.5 -28% | 43.5 ? -19% |
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 46.5 | 356 666% | 410 782% | 517 1012% | 518 1014% | 89.9 ? 93% |
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 176.3 | 152.9 | 148.1 | 136.3 | 128.7 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 205 | 191.8 | 156 | 146 | 112 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 88.9 | 85.3 | 74 | 64.4 | ||
The Witcher 3 v4 (2023) | 173.9 | 147.3 | 129.7 | 111.8 | 107.7 | 87.4 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 173.8 | 146.2 | 134.9 | 131.3 | 118.9 | 86.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 105 | 101.3 | 93.1 | 89.1 | 78.5 | 48.9 |
排放量
噪音排放
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 25.2 / 25.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 42.6 / 47.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Minisforum AI X1 Pro Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | BOSGAME M4 Neo R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | 4% | -18% | -26% | -18% | |
off / environment * | 24.7 | 23.8 4% | 23.8 4% | 24.3 2% | 24.7 -0% | 24.3 2% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 28 -12% | 24 4% | 33.7 -35% | 38.7 -55% | 37.6 -50% |
Idle Average * | 25.2 | 28.1 -12% | 24.1 4% | 33.7 -34% | 38.8 -54% | 37.9 -50% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.3 | 28.2 -11% | 24.1 5% | 33.8 -34% | 38.9 -54% | 38 -50% |
Load Average * | 42.6 | 38.4 10% | 42.7 -0% | 47.6 -12% | 51.6 -21% | 40.8 4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.5 | 38.7 9% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42.6 | 38.5 10% | 42.5 -0% | 47.7 -12% | 52 -22% | 40.18 6% |
Load Maximum * | 47.1 | 41.8 11% | 42.6 10% | 47.9 -2% | 51.6 -10% | 40.2 15% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 32.4 °C / 90 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.4 °C / 90 F for the class Mini PC.
发言人
华硕在 ExpertCenter PN54 中安装了一个小型扬声器,可在工作时播放低调的背景音乐。
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Minisforum AI X1 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 18% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Minisforum AI X1 Pro Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS R7 8845HS, Radeon 780M | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | BOSGAME M4 Neo R7 7840HS, Radeon 780M | Average AMD Radeon 860M | Average of class Mini PC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -69% | -18% | -8% | -57% | -67% | -23% | -113% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 8.6 -231% | 3.1 -19% | 3.8 -46% | 6.1 -135% | 7.6 -192% | 4.54 ? -75% | 9.55 ? -267% |
Idle Average * | 4.6 | 9.4 -104% | 5.7 -24% | 5.2 -13% | 7.9 -72% | 9.1 -98% | 6.74 ? -47% | 11.8 ? -157% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.4 | 10 -56% | 8.3 -30% | 8.4 -31% | 13.2 -106% | 11.1 -73% | 7.43 ? -16% | 15.3 ? -139% |
Load Average * | 68.5 | 70.2 -2% | 68.3 -0% | 50.1 27% | 60.7 11% | 67.2 2% | 60.9 ? 11% | 60.8 ? 11% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 60.2 | 70.7 -17% | 78.7 -31% | 51.6 14% | 67.4 -12% | 81.3 -35% | ||
Load Maximum * | 94 | 97.7 -4% | 97.7 -4% | 91.9 2% | 117.1 -25% | 98.4 -5% | 81.6 ? 13% | 104.9 ? -12% |
* ... smaller is better
功率效率
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo |
Power Consumption | |
Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
GMK EVO-T1 | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo | |
GMK EVO-T1 |
耗电量 - 外部监视器
耗电量 - 外部监视器
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN
- 08/25/2025 v8
Sebastian Bade
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Dimensions |
---|---|---|---|---|
Asus ExpertCenter PN54-S70012NN AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,100.00 List Price: 1249€ | 650 g | 130 x 130 x 34 mm | |
Minisforum AI X1 Pro AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,129.90 MINISFORUM AI X1 Pro-370 Min... 2. $999.90 MINISFORUM Mini PC AI X1 Pro... 3. $1,199.00 MINISFORUM N5 Pro 5-Bay Desk... | 1.4 kg | 195 x 195 x 42.5 mm | |
Geekom A8 Max, R7 8845HS AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 899 EUR | 681 g | 132 x 135 x 46.9 mm | |
Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,199.00 List Price: 1099€ | 595 g | 112 x 117 x 49.2 mm | |
GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,299.99 List Price: 999€ | 946 g | 151 x 154 x 73.6 mm | |
BOSGAME M4 Neo AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $599.99 BOSGAME M4 Neo Mini PC, Mini... 2. $598.99 BOSGAME M4 Oculink Mini PC R... 3. $619.00 BOSGAME Mini PC M4 AMD Ryzen... List Price: 389 EUR | 560 g | 127 x 127 x 42 mm |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.