判决
IdeaPad Pro 5 14 凭借其时尚的金属机身获得了最高分。银灰色的表面非常坚固，给人一种高档的感觉。在显示屏方面也没什么可批评的。虽然高分辨率的 16:10 OLED 屏幕容易反光，但在色域覆盖、对比度或响应时间方面都无可挑剔。由于配备了 92 Wh 的大容量电池，电池续航时间也令人印象深刻。
而新的 Ryzen AI 7 450 则让我们百感交集。一方面，它确实可以与英特尔的竞争对手相抗衡。不过，与老款 Ryzen AI 7 350 相比，性能几乎没有提高，我们将在评测过程中展示这一点。输入设备是典型的联想时尚，而端口的选择可以说是扎实的，尽管不像某些 Yoga Slim 笔记本那样慷慨。
Pros
+ 鲜艳的 OLED 屏幕
+ 高品质机身
+ 出色的电池续航能力
+ 隐私快门
+ 2x USB 4
Cons
- AMD 的 "新一代 "产品进展甚微
- 显示屏经常反光
价格和供应情况
经测试，搭载 Ryzen AI 7 450 的联想 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 的售价约为 欧元，但目前仅有极少数零售商上市。价格和供货情况可能因地区和零售商而异。
它的竞争对手包括价格低于1,500 欧元的其他 14 英寸笔记本电脑，如它的直接前身 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10。 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10以及基于英特尔酷睿 Ultra 5 226V 的设备，包括 华硕 Vivobook S 14 OLED和 宏碁 Swift 14 AI.
规格
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (IdeaPad Pro Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 8c/16t, 4 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5, 4 x 3.6 GHz AMD Zen 5c, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Gorgon Point
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 860M - 512 MB VRAM, RAM: 1066 MHz, LPDDR5, Adrenalin 26.3.1
Memory
32 GB
, LPDDR5X-8533, soldered (no expansion)
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, LEN140WQ+, OLED, Factory Calibration, HDR 1000, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Kioxia KEG70ZNTN1T02, 1 TB NVMe-SSD, one M.2 2242 slot (in use), one M.2 2280 slot (empty)
Weight
1.42 kg, Power Supply: 400 g
Price
1040 EUR
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
精心打造的机身重 1.4 千克，对于一款 14 英寸设备来说，既不算特别轻，也不算特别重。机身设计相当低调，因此在任何环境下都很美观。虽然显示屏不能完全打开 180°，但机盖的开启角度也令人信服。
连接性
考虑到笔记本电脑的尺寸，四个 USB 端口绰绰有余，尤其是两个 Type-C 端口支持最新的 USB 4 标准，包括 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort。此外，还有一个音频接口、一个 HDMI 输出端口和一个全尺寸、中速 SD 读卡器。来自 Realtek 的 Wi-Fi 7 模块也符合预期。全高清网络摄像头配有手动快门，清晰度高于平均水平，但色彩准确度不够理想。卸下五颗 Torx 螺丝后，即可打开机壳。内部结构的照片可在下面进一步查看。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 86.7, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2199 - 4510, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average Realtek 8922AE WiFi 7 PCI-E NIC (2199 - 2387, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1784 - 3363, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average Realtek 8922AE WiFi 7 PCI-E NIC (1471 - 1784, n=2) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Realtek 8922AE WiFi 7 PCI-E NIC; iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2199 (1828-2275)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7; iperf 3.1.3: Ø2248 (2065-2450)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Realtek 8922AE WiFi 7 PCI-E NIC; iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1784 (1671-1857)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1917 (1870-1943)
网络摄像头
12.7 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
19.7 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
10 ∆E
1 ∆E
维护
输入设备
白色背光 Chiclet 键盘提供了实用的键入体验和相当成功的布局。联想将平面按键与略微向下倾斜的按键相结合。触摸板的尺寸约为 13.5 x 8 厘米，在 14 英寸的同类产品中相当宽大，通常都能可靠地工作，尽管点击的感觉和声音有些嘎吱嘎吱的。其滑动性能尚可。
显示屏
IdeaPad Pro 5 14 的亮点之一是其高对比度和极其锐利的 OLED 面板，分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素，刷新率为 120 Hz，并支持 HDR。它唯一真正的弱点是表面反光严重，尤其是在户外使用时。测量亮度完全满足室内使用，平均 490 cd/m² 的亮度基本符合制造商的规格要求。其他优点还包括色彩空间覆盖范围大，甚至几乎完全覆盖了 AdobeRGB 色彩空间，而且出厂状态下的色彩已经相当准确。可视角度和响应时间是典型的 OLED 面板。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEN140WQ+ tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 496 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 489.6 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 485 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.31 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
calibrated: 1.78
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.98}
94.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.244
CCT: 6383 K
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 LG Philips 140WUX, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -3% | 1% | -24% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.8 | 99.9 0% | 98.4 -1% | 99.9 0% | 64 -36% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 95.3 -5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94.4 | 94.5 0% | 87.8 -7% | 97.6 3% | 66.2 -30% |
| Response Times | 23% | 22% | -5% | -5583% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.6 ? | 0.39 ? 76% | 0.4 ? 75% | 0.8 ? 50% | 57.7 ? -3506% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.5 ? | 0.49 ? 2% | 0.49 ? 2% | 0.8 ? -60% | 38.8 ? -7660% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 600 ? | 1200 ? | 1200 ? | 60 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 20 | 22 -10% | 22 -10% | ||
| Screen | 12% | 19% | -22% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 485 | 473 -2% | 478 -1% | 500 3% | 561.2 16% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 490 | 474 -3% | 484 -1% | 499 2% | 505 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 99 1% | 97 -1% | 97 -1% | 85 -13% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.22 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.31 | 1.2 48% | 1 57% | 3.55 -54% | 2.09 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.93 | 3.8 45% | 2.3 67% | 6.38 8% | 4.37 37% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.78 | 2.55 -43% | 1.09 39% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 1.5 -15% | 1.4 -8% | 2.2 -69% | 2.5 -92% |
| Gamma | 2.244 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.25 98% | 1.94 113% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6383 102% | 6214 105% | 6521 100% | 6405 101% | 6760 96% |
| Contrast (:1) | 50000 | 2551 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
12% | 13% /
14% | -9% /
-13% | -1869% /
-936% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.24 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.28 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.32 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 600 Hz Amplitude: 20 % | ≤ 80 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 600 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 600 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7879 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
在亚笔记本电脑领域，IdeaPad Pro 5 属于中端产品。虽然这款 14 英寸机型的内存不能升级，但 32 GB LPDDR5X 内存应该足够大多数用户使用一段时间。安装的 1 TB 固态硬盘仅为 2242 格式，不过联想提供了一个支持 2280 格式硬盘的备用 M.2 插槽。
测试条件
Fn+Q 组合键可以在四种不同的配置文件中进行选择，我们以其中三种为例进行了检查（见表）。与 前代一样，所有最终测量均在性能模式下进行。
| 模式 | 省电 | 自适应 | 性能 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 32 dB(A) | 44 dB(A) | 46 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077 帧率（FHD/超高清） | 17.5 fps | 19 fps | 19.2 fps |
| GPU 功耗 | ~20 W | ~54 W | ~56 W |
| CPU PL1 | 20 W | 54 W | 65 W |
| CPU PL2 | 30 W | 65 W | 65 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 1939 分 | 2698 分 | 2737 分 |
处理器
......（英文 Ryzen AI 7 450原来只是老版 Ryzen AI 7 350的略微调整版本，时钟频率略有提高，并可选择更快的内存，最高可达 8533 MHz。因此，新款 IdeaPad 的性能与其前代产品几乎不相上下，也就不足为奇了。令人欣慰的是，这款八核处理器可以处理多达 16 个线程，在整个 Cinebench 循环中保持了令人印象深刻的稳定性能。
Cinebench R15 多核耐久性测试
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 7 450: Ø2700 (2666.13-2713.15)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2634 (2611.99-2651.46)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350: Ø2437 (2416.92-2477.39)
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V: Ø1506 (1499.42-1513.6)
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V: Ø1347 (1268.87-1509.55)
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Intel Core Ultra 7 355: Ø1536 (1489.92-1654.26)
CPU Performance rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.6 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 124284, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
系统性能
在系统测试中，尽管与旧款 IdeaPad Pro 5 相比差距仍然很小，但这款 14 英寸设备还是在对比设备中名列第一。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU -5! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4920 - 8612, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8552 - 11457, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 16132, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5722 - 12442, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8612 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109734, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 118935, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.8 - 187.8, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 (n=1) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟时间比上一代产品要长，但仍在可接受的范围内。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
评测设备的 NVMe 固态硬盘来自 Kioxia，即使在长时间写入和读取时，也能提供始终如一的强劲性能。
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6969 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
6605 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
659.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
497.6 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
4266 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
5398 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
91.52 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
260.2 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
持续读取性能：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6976 (6268.22-7034.27)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6262 (5229.69-6594.94)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3421 (3188.51-3457.99)
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6673 (5576.29-6730.6)
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Micron 2550 512GB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4917 (4384.76-4931.66)
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6791 (5684.29-6824.12)
图形处理器性能
在 iGPU 方面也没有太大变化。iGPU Radeon 860M与英特尔的竞争对手 Arc Graphics 130V尤其是在游戏方面，我们很快就会看到。有趣的是，老款 IdeaPad Pro 5 14 的速度稍快，至少在 3DMark 测试中是如此。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 45893 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 219296 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36424 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5891 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2681 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
如果用户不想玩要求苛刻的游戏，并对中等分辨率和设置感到满意，那么 Radeon 860M 应该会让他们非常满意。优化良好的游戏，如 ARC Raiders在中低设置下以 1,920 x 1,080 像素流畅运行。如果其他游戏的性能变得紧张，使用 FSR 可能会有所帮助。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 179.7 | 171.8 | 80.3 | 32.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 183.5 | 149.1 | 100.4 | 89.4 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 81.6 | 64 | 50.5 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 37.7 | 31.4 | 23.3 | 21.9 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 43.4 | 33.7 | 25.8 | 19.2 |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 23.9 | 18.9 | 13.3 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 67.9 | 38.4 | 26.1 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 28.7 | 19.2 | 14.3 | |
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 39 | 21.6 | 19.7 | |
| Death Stranding 2 (2026) | 22.7 | 18.9 | 15.2 | |
| Crimson Desert (2026) | 27.6 | 14.9 | 14.1 |
ARC Raiders | Crimson Desert | Death Stranding 2 | Resident Evil Requiem | Anno 117: Pax Romana | The Outer Worlds 2
| Crimson Desert | |
| 1920x1080 Minimum Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14 - 31.1, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (7.38 - 19, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Death Stranding 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Portable Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10.6 - 28.1, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8.73 - 19.5, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Resident Evil Requiem | |
| 1920x1080 Lowest Settings (no upscaling) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (20.3 - 39, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (21.4 - 39, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 1920x1080 Normal Settings (no upscaling) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13.3 - 23.8, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (14.5 - 23.9, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (13.4 - 23.9, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Radeon 860M (11.8 - 18.9, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (9.91 - 18.9, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 对比
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M: Ø17.2 (15.7-18.1)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M: Ø19.2 (17.9-19.5)
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M: Ø19.1 (10.5-19.5)
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V: Ø20.1 (18.9-20.9)
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V: Ø20.1 (17.4-21.6)
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL: Ø18.1 (16.8-19.1)
排放量
噪音排放
在性能模式下，冷却系统的声音清晰可闻。在负载情况下，两个风扇的噪音高达 48 dB(A)，与前代产品基本相当。空转时，IdeaPad Pro 5 14 非常安静，风扇大部分时间都处于关闭状态。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 46 / 48 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | 2% | 10% | 2% | 12% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 23.6 2% | 24 -0% | 24.2 -1% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 23.6 2% | 24 -0% | 24.2 -1% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 23.6 6% | 24 4% | 24.2 3% | 26 -4% | 23 8% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 23.6 9% | 27.2 -5% | 24.2 7% | 29 -12% | 23.1 11% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 46 | 46.5 -1% | 44.1 4% | 28.8 37% | 40 13% | 30.8 33% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46 | 48.9 -6% | 44.1 4% | 37.6 18% | 40 13% | 35.4 23% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 48 | 48.9 -2% | 44.1 8% | 45.6 5% | 41 15% | 45.9 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度方面也出现了类似的情况，14 英寸设备的温度略高于旧型号，最高达 45 °C。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.6 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 10% | 7% | 8% | 7% | 22% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 44 | 42.2 4% | 44 -0% | 38.4 13% | 41 7% | 37.8 14% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45 | 42.4 6% | 42.9 5% | 49.7 -10% | 45 -0% | 38.6 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 30 | 25.4 15% | 26.5 12% | 25.1 16% | 26 13% | 21.2 29% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30 | 25.7 14% | 26.7 11% | 25.8 14% | 28 7% | 21.4 29% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 进行的压力测试并未对散热系统造成太大压力。一段时间后，Ryzen AI 7 450 的温度略高于 80 °C。
发言人
音质还算不错，只是在低音方面有一些不足，但也不太可能引起人们的共鸣。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理
耗电量
IdeaPad Pro 5 14 在空载时出奇地节俭，甚至低于前代产品，耗电量仅为 4 至 6 瓦，而前代产品为 5 至 7 瓦。在负载情况下，附带的 100 瓦电源适配器可提供高达 98 瓦的功率。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.4 / 0.8 Watt |
| Idle | 4.1 / 4.8 / 5.9 Watt |
| Load |
68 / 98 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | -7% | 22% | 10% | 37% | -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.1 | 5.1 -24% | 5.2 -27% | 2.7 34% | 5 -22% | 1.6 61% | 3.94 ? 4% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.8 | 6.8 -42% | 7.8 -63% | 6.7 -40% | 6 -25% | 3.7 23% | 6.86 ? -43% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 5.9 | 6.9 -17% | 8.1 -37% | 6.9 -17% | 10 -69% | 3.9 34% | 8.17 ? -38% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 68 | 71.7 -5% | 64.3 5% | 34.5 49% | 36 47% | 36 47% | 42.7 ? 37% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 81.7 | 84.8 -4% | 65.4 20% | 43 47% | 41.6 49% | 50.9 38% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 80.6 | 83.5 -4% | 64 21% | 41.9 48% | 38.2 53% | 47.7 41% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 98 | 104.8 -7% | 68.5 30% | 62.7 36% | 60 39% | 80 18% | 65.6 ? 33% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量：赛博朋克/压力测试
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø97.8 (97.7-97.9)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.83 (4.12-5.91)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø81.7 (79.9-83)
带外部监视器时的耗电量
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø95.2 (94-95.9)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø93 (83.9-95.6)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø65.5 (64.3-71.6)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.28 (3.49-9.11)
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø80.6 (78.8-83.8)
电池寿命
电池续航时间是这款 14 英寸设备的绝对优势之一，这主要归功于其 92 Wh 的电池容量。相比之下，其竞争对手只能提供 65 到 84 Wh 的电池容量。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，当亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 时，该设备的续航时间接近 15 小时，这是一个非常可观的成绩。
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 450, Radeon 860M, 92.5 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 84 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 70 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 75 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 70 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -6% | -32% | 16% | -15% | -2% | -7% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 14.8 | 13.9 -6% | 10.1 -32% | 17.2 16% | 12.6 -15% | 14.5 -2% | 13.7 ? -7% |
| H.264 (h) | 19.6 | 15.9 | 20 | 15.7 ? | |||
| Load (h) | 0.9 | 1 | 2.9 | 1.93 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
购买 IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 几乎不会出错。 这款 14 英寸机型没有犯任何明显的错误，至少在大多数方面都取得了不错的成绩。
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11
- 04/23/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 86.9%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 7 450 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,270.75 Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 16" 2.8... 2. $1,139.99 Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5-2025 - ... 3. $549.98 Lenovo Ideapad 5 Pro 16" 2.5... List Price: 1040 EUR | 1.4 kg | 15.7 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 87.4%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 989€ | 1.4 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
3. 85.3%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $909.00 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Laptop w... 2. $889.99 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Copilot ... 3. $785.00 Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 Copilot... List Price: 1299€ | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
4. 85.9%  | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1099€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
5. 83.5%  | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
6. 84.8%  | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1600 USD | 1.5 kg | 15.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
