结论 - Yoga Slim 7 14 存在外壳质量问题
最重要的是,新款 Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 的出色 OLED 显示屏给人留下了深刻印象,除了 HDR 模式下的超高亮度外,120 Hz 的刷新率和出色的色彩配置也带来了令人印象深刻的画质。虽然采用了 PWM 闪烁技术,但其频率极高,同时振幅也很低。不过,当笔记本电脑在户外使用时,其反光表面可能会成为一个问题。此外,良好的显示效果也会影响电池的续航时间,而这正是竞争对手普遍具有优势的地方。
AMD Ryzen 处理器的性能很好,而且很稳定,再加上 32 GB 内存,在这方面没有任何问题。另一方面,两个更快的能耗曲线几乎完全相同,我们希望看到它们之间有更大的差异。如果需要,笔记本电脑的风扇在负载情况下也能保持安静,在使用最节能模式时,其性能仍可与英特尔的 Lunar Lake 处理器媲美。
最大的问题在于它的外壳质量。虽然它轻巧小巧,但我们的测试设备却有明显的吱吱声。尤其是盖子,每次移动都会发出嘎吱嘎吱的响声,大大降低了笔记本电脑的质感。但从另一方面看,它具备所有现代连接标准,键盘也非常舒适。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
配备 AMD 处理器的 Yoga Slim 7 尚未在美国上市。它的最高售价约为 1,450 美元。
我们最近已经测试了当前的 Yoga Pro 7 14之后,我们现在来看看更轻薄的 Yoga Slim 7 14,除了更薄的外壳外,它还采用了不同的 OLED 屏幕。它再次使用了 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350处理器和 Radeon 860M iGPU和 32 GB 内存。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 铝制,有吱吱嘎嘎的声音
Yoga Slim 7 14 是一款轻薄的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,铝制外壳,有绿松石色和灰色两种颜色。我们的绿松石色测试设备看起来质量很高,但当你把它拿在手中时,这种印象很快就消失了。只要一打开盖子或调整角度,它就会发出明显的吱吱声。我们还设法从它的底座上听到了一些细微的吱吱声,这在 Yoga 系列产品中通常并不常见。此外,屏幕铰链有点太松,当你调整打开角度时,显示屏会反弹。总而言之,给人的印象不是很好。
Yoga Slim 7 14 的重量为 1.22 千克,是我们对比领域中最轻的笔记本电脑。此外,它的占地面积也最小,因此两者之间的差异并不大。总之,Yoga Slim 是一款相当便携的设备,可以毫不费力地放入大多数包/背包中。其 65 瓦的电源仅重 188 克,也相当轻巧。
连接性 - USB 4.0 和 Wi-Fi 7
Yoga Slim 7 14 配备了所有最重要的连接端口,包括 USB-C 4.0、一个普通 USB 端口和一个 HDMI 输出端口。这些接口分布在背面两侧。此外,该设备还配备了现代的 Wi-Fi 7 模块,在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的标准化 WLAN 测试中,该模块实现了非常出色和稳定的传输速率。它的网络摄像头配备了电子快门和红外模块,可通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别。虽然现在市场上有很多设备的网络摄像头都比它好,但它的画质总体来说还不错。得益于 AMD 处理器的快速 NPU,该设备被归类为 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑,因此它也支持微软的所有高级人工智能功能(如网络摄像头的 Studio Effects、实时字幕)。它没有配备读卡器。
Networking | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

维护
可持续性
Yoga Slim 7 14 G10 符合多项环保标准(碳中和认证、能源之星 8.0、EPEAT Gold),其包装可完全回收。不过,我们没有提供有关其二氧化碳排放量或所用回收材料比例的信息。
输入设备 - 舒适的键盘
显示屏 - 明亮的 OLED 显示屏,频率为 120 赫兹
我们已经对全新的 2.8K OLED 显示屏(2,880 x 1,800 像素)进行了多次测试,它在 Yoga Slim 7 14 中提供的画质也令人印象深刻。它的对比度极高,色彩鲜艳,所有内容看起来都非常清晰,响应时间超快,由于采用了 120 Hz 频率,运动看起来非常流畅。由于这不是一块触摸屏,我们在描绘浅色区域时没有发现颗粒问题。OLED 面板不会出现背光出血现象,反之,则会出现 PWM 闪烁。PWM 闪烁频率为 1.2 kHz,频率很高,振幅很小,因此不会给用户带来任何问题。屏幕亮度和色温都无法自动调节。
在 SDR 模式下,其亮度平均约为 480 cd/m²,这对于目前的 OLED 面板来说还算不错。而在 HDR 模式下,当显示小幅图像摘录时,亮度几乎达到 1,100 cd/m²,而当显示几乎全白的画面时,亮度仍有 746 cd/m²。这意味着 HDR 内容在这款 OLED 面板上的显示效果尤其出色。
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 478 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.83
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
87.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 CSOT MNE007ZA3-2, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 14 OLED M5406WA ATNA40CT02-0 (SDC41A0), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP OmniBook X 14 BOE0C93, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | -16% | 4% | -10% | 4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.4 | 99.9 2% | 69.2 -30% | 99.9 2% | 78.9 -20% | 99.9 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.5 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.8 | 94.5 8% | 71.2 -19% | 97.2 11% | 78.7 -10% | 97.6 11% |
Response Times | 1% | -5351% | -185% | -9747% | -82% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.4 ? | 0.39 ? 2% | 31.2 ? -7700% | 1.3 ? -225% | 52 ? -12900% | 0.8 ? -100% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.49 ? | 0.49 ? -0% | 15.2 ? -3002% | 1.2 ? -145% | 32.8 ? -6594% | 0.8 ? -63% |
PWM Frequency | 1200 ? | 1200 ? | 240 ? | 60 ? | ||
PWM Amplitude * | 22 | 22 -0% | ||||
Screen | -16% | -37% | -26% | -90% | -80% | |
Brightness middle | 478 | 473 -1% | 421 -12% | 385 -19% | 303 -37% | 500 5% |
Brightness | 484 | 474 -2% | 407 -16% | 382 -21% | 293 -39% | 499 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 99 2% | 94 -3% | 95 -2% | 90 -7% | 97 0% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.03 | 0.17 | 0.01 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.2 -20% | 1.59 -59% | 1.99 -99% | 2.6 -160% | 3.55 -255% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.3 | 3.8 -65% | 3.7 -61% | 3.69 -60% | 5.4 -135% | 6.38 -177% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.5 -7% | 2.4 -71% | 0.8 43% | 3.7 -164% | 2.2 -57% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.27 97% | 2.209 100% | 2.204 100% | 2.09 105% | 1.94 113% |
CCT | 6521 100% | 6214 105% | 7036 92% | 6474 100% | 6543 99% | 6405 101% |
Contrast | 1203 | 12833 | 1782 | 50000 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1 | 1.79 | 2.55 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-7% | -1801% /
-998% | -69% /
-47% | -3282% /
-1824% | -53% /
-57% |
* ... smaller is better
联想宣传的是出厂校准,我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件进行分析后证实了这一点。默认配置文件显示的色彩有点过于饱和,但 P3 和 sRGB 两种配置文件显示的数值非常出色,我们自己校准后也无法进一步改善。AdobeRGB 配置文件显示的色彩偏差之大几乎令人震惊,因为屏幕并没有完全覆盖这一色彩空间。不过,您可以在 sRGB 和 P3 色彩空间中编辑照片/视频,不受任何限制。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.27 ms rise | |
↘ 0.22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.23 ms rise | |
↘ 0.17 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1200 Hz Amplitude: 22 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1200 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8356 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - AMD Krackan Point
测试条件
联想提供了所有我们熟悉的能耗配置文件,你可以通过 Fn+Q 组合键轻松切换。我们在 "性能"模式下进行了基准测试,但我们希望看到 "自动 "和"性能"之间有更大的差异。在电池模式下,三种配置文件的性能保持一致。
能源概况 | TDP | CB 2024 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 1080p 低 | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
省电 | 15 瓦 | 577 分 | 2,164 分 | 27.7fps | 29.6 dB(A) |
自动 | 54/42 瓦 | 890 分 | 2,879 分 | 39.9fps | 41 dB(A) |
性能 | 54/45 瓦 | 901 分 | 2,868 分 | 40.4fps | 44.1 dB(A) |
处理器 - AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350(Krackan Point)结合了四个快速 Zen 5 内核(最高 5 GHz)和四个更高效的 Zen 5 内核(最高 3.5 GHz,缓存较少)。在我们的测试中,Yoga 的整体性能非常出色,仅次于 IdeaPad Pro 5。它的性能明显优于英特尔的 Lunar Lake 芯片,尤其是在多核性能方面。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 -3! |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (800 - 977, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1162, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (114 - 117.7, n=6) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 173, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (14383 - 17899, n=7) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1943 - 2006, n=7) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=74, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (5483 - 6990, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (761 - 784, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (2419 - 2660, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (204 - 305, n=6) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=70, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (182 - 246, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (48124 - 63807, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (6042 - 6162, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (10774 - 14028, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (2836 - 2882, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3820, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (9997 - 12458, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1955 - 2135, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (19 - 22.9, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (50.4 - 66.5, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (0.403 - 0.4189, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (22795 - 27796, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87919 - 107379, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (3764 - 4322, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (67317 - 77400, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12671 - 13677, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (46152 - 57717, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (56915 - 84817, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (1042 - 1138, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (12177 - 14991, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (25283 - 47405, n=6) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
系统性能
在日常使用中,Yoga Slim 7 的运行速度超快,其合成基准测试结果也证明了这一点。在测试过程中,我们没有发现任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU -5! | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 -4! | |
HP OmniBook X 14 -4! |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (6982 - 7671, n=5) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (10801 - 12222, n=5) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11406, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (9674 - 10040, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (8842 - 10028, n=5) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1696 - 2005, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1624 - 1869, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1887 - 2236, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (1401 - 1784, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (295 - 328, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (249 - 275, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M (436 - 437, n=5) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7418 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (38001 - 106997, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (44209 - 63650, n=6) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (42604 - 107869, n=6) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6.8 - 187.8, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 (87.7 - 103.3, n=6) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备配备了 Kioxia 的 1 TB SSD,通过 PCIe 4.0 连接。在测试过程中,M.2-2242 固态硬盘的性能完全正常,即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定。首次启动设备后,用户可使用 890 GB。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU
AMD 处理器集成了 AMD Radeon 860M显卡。它的性能在日常使用中已经足够,例如播放高分辨率视频也不成问题。就纯粹的性能而言,Radeon 860M 可与 Arc Graphics 130V 相媲美,但 880M/890M 和 Arc Graphics 140V/140T 都要快得多。它的游戏性能符合预期,你可以流畅运行《赛博朋克 2077》或《博德之门 3》等当前游戏--至少在低细节的情况下是如此。
无论是在电池模式下还是在持续负载情况下,图形处理器的性能都很稳定。更多基准测试 技术部分.
3DMark 11 Performance | 11800 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6715 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3147 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 378 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2431 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 2425 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
HP OmniBook X 14 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 860M (283 - 381, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=71, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 | |
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=74, last 2 years) | |
HP OmniBook X 14 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 173.2 | 157.4 | 70 | 27.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.9 | 134.9 | 82.1 | 77 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 78.7 | 37.9 | 27.1 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 77.6 | 59 | 48.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 97 | 52 | 47 | 44 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 165.4 | 65 | 53.9 | 45.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36 | 29 | 23 | 22.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 40.4 | 29.9 | 23.6 | 19.1 |
F1 24 (2024) | 72.9 | 65.2 | 48.7 | 10.4 |
排放量
噪音排放
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 27.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.1 / 44.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02 | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | HP OmniBook X 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Micron 2550 512GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | -3% | 8% | 12% | 0% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 23.6 2% | 24 -0% | 24.2 -1% | 23.7 1% | 25 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23.6 2% | 24 -0% | 24.2 -1% | 23.7 1% | 25 -4% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 23.6 2% | 25 -4% | 24.2 -1% | 23.7 1% | 26 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 27.2 | 23.6 13% | 26 4% | 24.2 11% | 23.7 13% | 29 -7% |
Load Average * | 44.1 | 46.5 -5% | 45 -2% | 28.8 35% | 29.7 33% | 40 9% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.1 | 48.9 -11% | 48 -9% | 37.6 15% | 37.1 16% | 40 9% |
Load Maximum * | 44.1 | 48.9 -11% | 48 -9% | 45.6 -3% | 37.1 16% | 41 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.2 F).
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | HP OmniBook X 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -11% | 1% | 3% | -0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44 | 42.2 4% | 43 2% | 38.4 13% | 44.2 -0% | 41 7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.9 | 42.4 1% | 46 -7% | 49.7 -16% | 44.5 -4% | 45 -5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 25.4 4% | 32 -21% | 25.1 5% | 25.1 5% | 26 2% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.7 | 25.7 4% | 31 -16% | 25.8 3% | 24.3 9% | 28 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
该设备的音响系统由四个模块组成,音效比较强劲,但最大音量不是特别高。不过,扬声器足以播放电影或一些背景音乐。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook X 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - 无运行时间记录
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP OmniBook X 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Micron 2550 512GB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Average AMD Radeon 860M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -14% | 16% | 29% | 37% | 19% | -2% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 5.1 2% | 4.8 8% | 2.7 48% | 2.5 52% | 5 4% | 5.14 ? 1% | 4.23 ? 19% |
Idle Average * | 7.8 | 6.8 13% | 5.4 31% | 6.7 14% | 4.7 40% | 6 23% | 7.16 ? 8% | 7.28 ? 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.1 | 6.9 15% | 7.5 7% | 6.9 15% | 6.2 23% | 10 -23% | 7.74 ? 4% | 8.95 ? -10% |
Load Average * | 64.3 | 71.7 -12% | 47 27% | 34.5 46% | 25.6 60% | 36 44% | 63.4 ? 1% | 45 ? 30% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 65.4 | 84.8 -30% | 54.1 17% | 43 34% | 40.3 38% | 41.6 36% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 64 | 83.5 -30% | 51.6 19% | 41.9 35% | 36.7 43% | 38.2 40% | ||
Load Maximum * | 68.5 | 104.8 -53% | 67 2% | 62.7 8% | 67.9 1% | 60 12% | 83.6 ? -22% | 68.6 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 70 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 84 Wh | Medion SPRCHRGD 14 S2 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 65 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 75 Wh | HP OmniBook X 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 59 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 16% | 22% | 97% | 59% | 24% | 44% | |
H.264 | 951 | 1177 24% | 1199 26% | 1298 36% | 980 ? 3% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 606 | 833 37% | 740 22% | 1030 70% | 1117 84% | 753 24% | 776 ? 28% |
Load | 59 | 52 -12% | 174 195% | 92 56% | 119.3 ? 102% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10
- 05/15/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.