评语：设计感强，显示选项少
EliteBook 8 G1a 16 在上一代产品的多个方面进行了改进 EliteBook 865 G10.它不仅更薄，集成了 NPU 和额外的端口，而且键盘和点击板也得到了改进，从而提高了可用性。纤薄的外形在电池容量和制造质量方面也没有丝毫妥协。
不过，作为一款入门级 EliteBook，该机型存在一些明显的缺点。Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 的性能与较早的 Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS与去年的 EliteBook 865 G10 中的老款 Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS非常相似，而集成 GPU 则仅限于 Radeon 860M，而不是速度更快的 880M 或 890M。同时，由于黑白响应时间较慢，显示屏被固定为 1200p 和 60 Hz，出现了明显的重影。亮度和色彩都还不错，但遗憾的是，配置触摸屏意味着要牺牲完整的 sRGB 覆盖范围。如果用户或编辑希望获得这些高端功能，可以考虑惠普价格更高的 EliteBook X或 EliteBook Ultra系列或竞争对手如 戴尔 Pro 系列.
Pros
Cons
以商务为中心的 EliteBook 8 系列直接取代了即将推出的 EliteBook 800 系列。新的命名规则更容易识别处理器的价格类别、世代和类型。在本例中，本次评测的 EliteBook 8 G1a 16 是入门级（8）第一代（G1）机型，采用 AMD（a）处理器。更高端的 EliteBook 机型采用 "X "或 "Ultra "名称，而不是 "8"。
我们的测试配置是价格较高的 SKU，配备 Zen 5 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 CPU、32 GB 内存和 1200p IPS 显示屏，售价约 1900 美元。较低端的配置从 Zen 4 Ryzen 5 Pro 230 开始，而 1200p 原生分辨率则是固定的。
16 英寸 EliteBook 8 G1a 的替代产品包括其他入门级到中端商务或办公笔记本电脑，如 华硕 ExpertBook B5, 联想 ThinkPad L16或戴尔Latitude 5000 至 7000 系列.该机型还有一个 14 英寸版本，称为 EliteBook 8 G1a 14.对于英特尔粉丝来说，配备酷睿 Ultra CPU 的型号被命名为 EliteBook 8 G1i 16。
更多惠普评论：
规格
外壳：熟悉但更薄的外观
惠普在其 EliteBook 系列产品中使用了类似的铝和镁材料，因此光滑明亮的灰色外观应该让人一见如故。由于设计经过了几代的改进，尽管是低端的 EliteBook 8 系列机型，但系统并没有廉价的感觉。它比 Spectre x360 16相比，它的弯曲度稍高，但差异并不令人担忧。单调的颜色和单调的设计与办公空间和专业环境融为一体。
该系统在长度、宽度和重量上与 EliteBook 865 G10 几乎完全相同，但厚度明显减少了几毫米，因此更紧凑但更便携。这款笔记本电脑重 1.9 千克，与其他 16 英寸机型（如华硕 ExpertBook B5 或 宏碁 Swift 16等其他 16 英寸机型明显要轻几百克。
连接性
与去年的 EliteBook 865 G10 相比，EliteBook 8 G1a 16 将一个 USB-A 端口换成了第三个 USB-C 端口。这可以说是一种改进，因为该机型使用 USB-C 接口充电，这意味着用户在停靠时有两个空闲的 USB-C 接口，而不是只有一个。请记住，只有左侧边缘的两个 USB-C 端口支持 Thunderbolt 4 设备，而右侧的第三个 USB-C 端口仅限于 10 Gbps。
交流
标配 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4。4G 或 5G 广域网为可选配置。
网络摄像头
标配 500 万像素网络摄像头，带红外和手动快门功能，以及惠普的 Poly Camera Pro 软件，可为电话会议优化额外的摄像头功能，详见我们的 EliteBook 865 G10 评测.
维护
底板仅用四颗十字螺丝固定，便于维修，这也是任何一款好的商务笔记本电脑应有的功能。虽然内存可通过两个 SODIMM 插槽升级，但遗憾的是，尽管采用了 16 英寸的大尺寸外形，存储却仅限于一个 M.2 2280 插槽。如果不配置 WAN 模块，则不包括 WAN 天线。
可持续性
底座和外盖分别由至少 80% 的可回收铝和镁组成，键盘键帽和薄膜分别由至少 50% 和 70% 的可回收塑料组成。如果配置触摸屏选件，覆盖层由 20% 的可回收玻璃组成。
配件和保修
零售包装盒中除了交流适配器和文件外，没有任何其他附件。如果直接从惠普公司购买，则享受三年有限制造商保修服务。
输入设备 - 更大的按键和点击板
键盘
与联想 Yoga 等以消费者为中心的笔记本电脑相比，EliteBook 的键盘通常更坚固，反馈更令人满意。 联想 Yoga、戴尔 XPS 或惠普Pavilion 系列等以消费者为中心的笔记本电脑相比，EliteBook 的键盘通常更坚硬，反馈更令人满意。这种差别也不小，因为在 EliteBook 上打字明显感觉更清晰或更干脆，而不是软绵绵的。有适度的咔嗒声，但音调不高，不会太令人分心。
触摸板
点击板比旧款 EliteBook 865 G10 上的点击板要大（13.5 x 8.6 厘米对 12.7 x 8.5 厘米），但仍保持了前者相对轻柔的反馈和光滑的表面区域。不过，拖放操作的准确性不如配备专用鼠标按键的笔记本电脑，如 联想 ThinkPad L16.
显示屏 - 仅 1200p IPS
1200p 原生分辨率和 60 Hz 刷新率在当前所有配置中都是固定的。这与 华硕专家本 B5相比，华硕 ExpertBook B5 可提供更高的原始分辨率、更快的刷新率和更快的响应时间，从而获得更出色的图像质量。不过，对于日常办公任务和浏览而言，1200p60 IPS 面板即使不是毫无新意，也已足够。
有趣的是，虽然该机型提供非触摸屏和触摸屏两种选择，但只有前者能提供完整的 sRGB 色彩，而后者则仅限于 63% 的覆盖率。潜在买家需要根据他们认为哪种功能更重要来谨慎选择。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 439.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 1417:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}
calibrated: 0.49
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
70.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
68.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
CCT: 6438 K
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook 865 G10 InfoVision IVO3E94 (X160NV42 R0), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V SDC41B6, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE MNG007QS1-3, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Dell 16 Plus AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | -0% | 27% | -41% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 68.5 | 72.8 6% | 68.5 0% | 99.9 46% | 39.5 -42% | 76.6 12% |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.6 | 99.9 1% | 98.3 0% | 100 1% | 58.7 -40% | 99.8 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.4 | 75 7% | 69.4 -1% | 94.6 34% | 40.8 -42% | 78.4 11% |
| Response Times | 7% | 36% | 66% | 51% | 30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50.2 ? | 48 ? 4% | 35.6 ? 29% | 4.8 ? 90% | 24.6 ? 51% | 32.8 ? 35% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.7 ? | 27.6 ? 10% | 17.5 ? 43% | 18 ? 41% | 15 ? 51% | 23.4 ? 24% |
| PWM Frequency | 550 | 481 | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * | 39 | |||||
| Screen | -39% | -33% | 188% | -158% | -36% | |
| Brightness middle | 439.2 | 865 97% | 413 -6% | 425 -3% | 334 -24% | 335.6 -24% |
| Brightness | 405 | 724 79% | 408 1% | 421 4% | 322 -20% | 308 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 47 -47% | 94 7% | 98 11% | 89 1% | 88 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.34 -10% | 0.2 35% | 0.0219 93% | 0.3 3% | 0.22 29% |
| Contrast | 1417 | 2544 80% | 2065 46% | 19406 1270% | 1113 -21% | 1525 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 4.86 -121% | 3.6 -64% | 1.73 21% | 5.4 -145% | 4.15 -89% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.31 | 11.58 -169% | 7.1 -65% | 3.82 11% | 19.6 -355% | 9.8 -127% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.49 | 1.05 -114% | 1.5 -206% | 4.9 -900% | 0.44 10% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.2 | 8 -150% | 4.6 -44% | 0.09 97% | 2 37% | 6.7 -109% |
| Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.66 83% | 2.25 98% | 2.346 94% | 2.15 102% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6438 101% | 6636 98% | 7461 87% | 6432 101% | 6283 103% | 6260 104% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -9% /
-23% | 1% /
-16% | 94% /
132% | -49% /
-103% | 1% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
显示器开箱后的校准效果不错，灰度和色彩 DeltaE 平均值分别仅为 3.2 和 2.2。使用我们的 X-Rite 色度计对显示器进行校准后，平均值会进一步降低到 1 以下，如下图 CalMAN 结果所示，这样就能更好地利用面板的全部 sRGB 色彩。我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8262 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在阴凉处的室外能见度尚可，但尽管采用了磨砂覆盖层，总体能见度也一般。需要注意的是，与即将上市的 EliteBook 865 G10 不同，该机型没有 Sure View 功能。
性能 - 精益禅 5 性能
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前，我们将 MyHP 设置为 "性能 "模式。如果设置为 "智能感应 "模式，Windows 电源配置文件将自动设置为平衡模式。
处理器
......（英文 Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350的多线程性能与 Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS或竞争产品 Core Ultra 5 225H/酷睿至尊 7 255H系列。最明显的是，它轻松超越了任何 U 系列或 V 系列笔记本电脑，如 联想 ThinkPad L16或 Acer Swift 16 AI。性能的可持续性也非常出色，在受压时不会出现严重的节流问题。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE -1! | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 -7! | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (13067 - 13539, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (2720 - 2855, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Acer Swift Go 16 AI SFG16-61-R5Y5 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 IML | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G2 21K70035GE | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 2-in-1 16IAL10 | |
| LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
压力测试
在运行 Prime95 压力测试时，CPU 会提升至 3.7 GHz、51 W 和 77 C，几秒钟后又降至 3.3 GHz、41 W 和 72 C。因此，最大 Turbo Boost 持续时间受到限制，以支持相对较低的核心温度。
运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，核心温度稳定在 65 摄氏度，而戴尔 16 Plus 的核心温度为 74 摄氏度。 戴尔 16 Plus的核心温度稳定在 65 摄氏度，而采用更快的 Arc 140T GPU 的戴尔 16 Plus 则为 74 摄氏度。
| CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 39 |
| Prime95 压力 | 3.3 | -- | 72 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 3.5 | 600 | 70 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.1 - 1.5 | ~2100 - 2800 | ~65 |
系统性能
由于采用了 H 系列 AMD CPU，PCMark 分数超过了许多其他以商务为中心的 16 英寸笔记本电脑。另一方面，由于集成的 Radeon 860M 落后于 Arc 140T 或 Radeon 890M，因此在数字内容创建方面的得分落后于其他系统。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7626 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 (n=1) | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
LatencyMon 显示，在打开主页的多个浏览器标签页时会出现 DPC 问题，在长达一分钟的 4K60 视频播放测试中会出现 18 个丢帧。重复测试后，结果没有改善。一般来说，AMD 系统在视频播放过程中的丢帧率往往高于英特尔系统。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
美光 美光 3500PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD 在以相对稳定的 ~7000 MB/s 读取速率运行时不会出现节流现象。惠普不会配置二级驱动器，但提供 TLC 和非 TLC 选项。
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
集成中端 Radeon 860M比最高端的 Radeon 890M.尽管如此，它仍然比 Iris Xe 96 EUs或 Radeon RX Vega系列的升级。
遗憾的是，EliteBook 8 G1a 16 除了 Radeon 860M 之外没有其他升级选项。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 7131 | 26942 | 2277 |
| 平衡模式 | 7189 (-0%) | 26686 (-0%) | 2231 (-0%) |
| 电池电量 | 6789 (-5%) | 21497 (-20%) | 2174 (-5%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 10770 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 31852 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6465 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 2996 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V -1! | |
| Dell 16 Plus -1! | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI | |
| Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V | |
| Dell 16 Plus | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA | |
| HP EliteBook 865 G10 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 165.9 | 158.6 | 58.7 | 25.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.7 | 133.4 | 78.4 | 72.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 66.9 | 34 | 23.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 65 | 49.8 | 41.1 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 147.8 | 56.5 | 47.4 | 40 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36.5 | 30.4 | 23.5 | 22.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 35.6 | 27.7 | 21.7 | 17.9 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 67.2 | 56.2 | 44.3 | 9.84 |
排放量
系统噪音
冷却系统已更新为包括两个风扇，而不是只有一个。尽管如此，如果你是电源用户，当引入压力负荷时，转速变化似乎会更快，从而导致系统噪音增大。除此之外，在浏览网页或进行流媒体播放时，基本听不到噪音。在我们的测试中，在智能感应模式或性能模式下运行对风扇行为的影响微乎其微。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 22.8 / 22.8 / 24.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 46 / 49.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Micron 3500 MTFDKBA512TGD | HP EliteBook 865 G10 Radeon 780M, R9 PRO 7940HS, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Arc 130T, Ultra 5 225H, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Arc 140V, Core Ultra 9 288V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 7735U, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X164N | Dell 16 Plus Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 256V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 13% | -4% | 2% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 22.7 | 23 -1% | 23.2 -2% | 25.8 -14% | 25.2 -11% | 23.4 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 22.8 | 23 -1% | 23.2 -2% | 25.8 -13% | 25.2 -11% | 23.5 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 22.8 | 23 -1% | 23.2 -2% | 25.8 -13% | 25.2 -11% | 23.5 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 24.7 | 23 7% | 23.2 6% | 26.7 -8% | 25.2 -2% | 23.5 5% |
| Load Average * | 46 | 29.17 37% | 26.3 43% | 38.3 17% | 31.9 31% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.7 | 35.4 27% | 44.4 9% | 41.5 15% | 42.6 13% | |
| Load Maximum * | 49.5 | 39.46 20% | 38.8 22% | 41.1 17% | 41.8 16% | 46.9 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 38.91 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
系统左半部分的表面温度最高，键盘和底面的热点温度分别高达 39 摄氏度和 34 摄氏度。不过，这比我们在 EliteBook 865 G10 上记录的温度要低得多，在 EliteBook 865 G10 上，类似条件下的热点温度可达 45 摄氏度至 50 摄氏度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.2 °C / 81 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+0.4 °C / 0.7 F).
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, AMD Radeon 860M | HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS, AMD Radeon 780M | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, Intel Arc Graphics 130T | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U, AMD Radeon 680M | Dell 16 Plus Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -24% | -10% | 0% | -8% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38 | 45 -18% | 40.7 -7% | 37.9 -0% | 38.6 -2% | 40.6 -7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 33.4 | 50 -50% | 47.8 -43% | 31.5 6% | 45.7 -37% | 40 -20% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 30 -7% | 26 7% | 28.3 -1% | 25.6 9% | 29.2 -4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.2 | 34 -21% | 27 4% | 29.7 -5% | 28.8 -2% | 28.6 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
该系统比 专家本 B5在运行 Prime95 时，尽管我们的 AMD CPU 和华硕的 Core Ultra 5 225H CPU 性能不相上下。在运行游戏时，功耗也会高出约 20%，这与 Radeon 860M 比 Arc 130T 更快的图形性能形成了大致的互补。与箭湖英特尔酷睿-H 相比，每瓦的整体性能并无明显差异。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100% 时，我们可以通过小型（约 13.5 x 6 x 2.3 厘米）100 W USB-C 交流适配器记录到约 80 W 的临时最大功耗。
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.88 Watt |
| Idle | 2.9 / 6.5 / 6.7 Watt |
| Load |
65.6 / 80.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, Micron 3500 MTFDKBA512TGD, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X164N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -62% | -10% | -17% | 0% | 15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 5.2 -79% | 4.7 -62% | 5.7 -97% | 4.6 -59% | 3.4 -17% |
| Idle Average * | 6.5 | 12.8 -97% | 9.7 -49% | 7.4 -14% | 8.2 -26% | 6.9 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.7 | 14.1 -110% | 10.1 -51% | 7.9 -18% | 8.9 -33% | 7.4 -10% |
| Load Average * | 65.6 | 65 1% | 44.2 33% | 45.8 30% | 41.7 36% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 62.8 | 50.9 19% | 41.4 34% | 38 39% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 65.8 | 50.3 24% | 49.8 24% | 42.4 36% | 41.4 37% | |
| Load Maximum * | 80.6 | 101.44 -26% | 69.6 14% | 65.41 19% | 65.5 19% | 62 23% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 68.2 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
有两种电池配置可供选择：62 Wh 或 77 Wh。我们的 77 Wh 测试机实际 WLAN 浏览时间超过 13 小时。
从空电到满电的充电时间相对较短，不到 90 分钟。
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, 77 Wh | HP EliteBook 865 G10 R9 PRO 7940HS, Radeon 780M, 76 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Ultra 5 225H, Arc 130T, 50 Wh | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Core Ultra 9 288V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE R7 PRO 7735U, Radeon 680M, 57 Wh | Dell 16 Plus Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 64 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 16% | -33% | -1% | -15% | 6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 795 | 924 16% | 531 -33% | 791 -1% | 674 -15% | 844 6% |
| H.264 | 839 | 656 | ||||
| Load | 86 | 178 |
笔记本检查评级
EliteBook G1a 16 比去年的 EliteBook 865 G10 更纤薄，按键也有所改进，但原始 CPU 性能依然平平，显示屏也仅限于 1200p IPS。
HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI
- 09/09/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87%  | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 16 AI AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,777.93 List Price: 4400 USD | 1.9 kg | 15.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
2. 85.8% v7 (old)  | HP EliteBook 865 G10 AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1504 Euro | 1.9 kg | 19.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
3. 84.4%  | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5605CCA Intel Core Ultra 5 225H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $215.24 A-Tech 64GB Kit (2x32GB) RAM... 2. $34.99 Laptop Case Cover Sleeve for... List Price: 1300€ | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
4. 85.3%  | Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51T-932H, Ultra 9 288V Intel Core Ultra 9 288V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 1.5 kg | 15.95 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
5. 84.8%  | Lenovo ThinkPad L16 Gen 1 21L70010GE AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7735U ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1250€ | 1.9 kg | 25.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
6. 81.8%  | Dell 16 Plus Intel Core Ultra 7 256V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,099.99 List Price: 1150 USD | 1.8 kg | 16.99 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
