评价:升级空间大,性能模式弱
启动 "性能模式 "后,这款游戏笔记本电脑的性能与预期有些差距。另一方面,它比一些竞争对手要安静一些,如果你需要更强的动力,你还可以切换到声音很大的 "涡轮增压模式"。不过,我们希望在这两种模式之间有一种模式。强大的可升级性和良好的设备也是值得肯定的:4 个内存插槽和 3 个固态硬盘插槽,加上高质量的迷你 LED 面板和快速的 Wi-Fi 7。
不过,Wi-Fi 6E 以下的传输速率相比之下就显得特别慢了。此外,显示屏盖子自动关闭的速度太快也令人有些恼火。虽然固态硬盘的速度很快,但在长时间负载的情况下还是会出现一些节流现象。
Pros
Cons
去年,我们购买了配备迷你 LED 面板的 Helios 18、 酷睿 i9-14900HX和 GeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑作为游戏玩家的 "全能无忧套装"。但风扇控制、功耗和固态硬盘的节流问题却让人颇有微词。宏碁今年在这方面做了什么?
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱和功能:便于升级的掠夺者
乍一看,黑色的机箱和突出于机箱后部的冷却系统似乎没有什么变化。但当所有的灯光都亮起时,你就会发现它与 前代产品.例如,前左侧边缘现在有了一条 LED 灯带。底座、盖子和出风口现在也亮了。
在厚度相同的情况下,新款 Helios 18 的两边略短,但重量却增加了近 200 克。
全高清网络摄像头已经跟不上时代的步伐;图像显得模糊不清,清晰度也有待提高,但色彩偏差还可以接受。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (20 - 207, n=72, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=71, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI |

可持续性
宏碁没有提供任何有关二氧化碳排放量的信息。包装主要由硬纸板组成,甚至可以用作耳机支架。不过,电源装置是用塑料包装的,而宏碁的运输箱内则装有聚苯乙烯。
输入设备 - Predator 按钮和大量 RGB
显示屏 - 1 600p 微型 LED
在我们的测试中,Helios 配备的是 250 Hz 的 QHD mini-LED 显示屏,而宏碁在网站上宣传的 4K 双模显示屏只有RTX 5090 笔记本电脑 才能使用。
不过,测试设备的面板质量仍然很高,我们测得的平均亮度超过 700 尼特。照明效果非常好,没有光晕,黑度极低,对比度非常高。显示器确实会闪烁,但闪烁率很低,即使是敏感的人也不会注意到 PWM。P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间完全覆盖。
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 400 cd/m²
Contrast: 18250:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.34 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
calibrated: 2.44
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.86 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
90.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.62
CCT: 6859 K
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 250 Hz | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW B180QAN01.2 (AUO45A8), Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 250 Hz | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 BOEhydis NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX N180QDM-NM2, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG AU Optronics B180ZAN01.0, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 18", 120 Hz | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -3% | -1% | 0% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 99.7 0% | 97.1 -3% | 99 -1% | 99.7 0% | 98.1 -2% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 90.1 | 91.6 2% | 84.7 -6% | 87.2 -3% | 90.4 0% | 86.3 -4% |
Response Times | -295% | -96% | -114% | -159% | -90% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.6 ? | 8 ? -122% | 5.6 ? -56% | 7.4 ? -106% | 8.8 ? -144% | 4.3 ? -19% |
Response Time Black / White * | 3.1 ? | 17.6 ? -468% | 7.3 ? -135% | 10.4 ? -235% | 15 ? -384% | 8.1 ? -161% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 | 4832 ? | 20610 ? | 15430 ? | ||
PWM Amplitude * | 100 | 100 -0% | 50 50% | |||
Screen | 5% | -122% | -3% | -10% | -153% | |
Brightness middle | 730 | 722 -1% | 478 -35% | 764 5% | 704 -4% | 543 -26% |
Brightness | 719 | 724 1% | 456 -37% | 747 4% | 680 -5% | 502 -30% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 93 -3% | 89 -7% | 93 -3% | 88 -8% | 86 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.04 | 0.04 -0% | 0.4 -900% | 0.1 -150% | 0.56 -1300% | |
Contrast | 18250 | 18050 -1% | 1195 -93% | 7640 -58% | 970 -95% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.34 | 3.4 -2% | 3.94 -18% | 1.2 64% | 4.11 -23% | 3.41 -2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.56 | 5.32 19% | 8.6 -31% | 2.8 57% | 6.43 2% | 6.4 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.44 | 1.6 34% | 0.75 69% | 2.5 -2% | 0.66 73% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.86 | 3.8 2% | 5.5 -42% | 1.5 61% | 4.9 -27% | 3.4 12% |
Gamma | 2.62 84% | 2.383 92% | 2.212 99% | 2.17 101% | 2.03 108% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6859 95% | 7051 92% | 7059 92% | 6556 99% | 6331 103% | 6070 107% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -96% /
-39% | -74% /
-92% | -39% /
-26% | -56% /
-42% | -82% /
-112% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
3.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.7 ms rise | |
↘ 0.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2500 Hz Amplitude: 100 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 2500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 2500 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8287 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 在性能模式下略低于平均水平
配备了 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX和 英伟达GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑这款 18 英寸的大型笔记本电脑明确定位为高端游戏玩家和台式机的替代品,这也得益于其众多的升级选项。
测试条件
PredatorSense 是控制中心 (我们的评论文章)是宏碁游戏笔记本电脑的控制中心。该程序包含许多设置,但有些混乱、复杂和过载。例如,图形切换通过文本链接("GPU 操作设置")进行,很容易被忽略。有 4 种性能模式(安静、平衡、性能、加速);我们使用性能模式进行基准测试。
开机时,启动声音总是非常响亮,让人不禁莞尔。幸运的是,可以在 PredatorSense(个人设置,系统启动效果)中关闭恼人的启动声音。
Acer Jump Start "软件也很烦人。它会弹出 Dropbox 的提示,令人讨厌,但实际上用处不大,可以放心卸载。
能源概况 | PL2/PL1 | CB 15 Multi | CP 2077 FHD Ultra | 最大。风扇容量 |
---|---|---|---|---|
静音型 | 115/75 瓦 | 4,709 点 | 111 fps | 27.5 dB(A) |
平衡型 | 135/115 瓦 | 5,242 点 | 121 fps | 39 dB(A) |
功率 | 160/135 瓦 | 5,379 点 | 139.6 帧/秒 | 50.33 分贝(A) |
涡轮 | 190/160 瓦 | 5,894 点 | 147 帧/秒 | 60 分贝(A) |
电池(平衡) | 135/115 瓦 | 3,319 点 | 26.6 fps | 27.5 dB(A) |
处理器
英特尔 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 275HX英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 275HX 安装在许多高端游戏笔记本电脑中,其 24 个内核(8 个 P 内核、16 个 E 内核)的主频高达 4.6 至 5.4 GHz。
在 Cinebench R15 连续循环测试中,我们的 Helios 18 处于中间位置。在 Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1较弱,而 华硕 Strix Scar 18更快,二者CPU相同。在所有 CPU 测试中,采用相同 CPU 的笔记本电脑平均快 6%,而华硕 Strix Scar 甚至快 13%。在 Turbo 模式下,Cinebench R15 分数高于平均水平,但仍低于许多竞争对手。
离开电源插座后,Helios 18 的 CPU 性能下降了约 38%。
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30712 - 40970, n=23) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=149, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2009 - 2267, n=23) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=149, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12026 - 16108, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=148, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (774 - 870, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=148, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4756 - 6271, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=148, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (306 - 343, n=23) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=147, last 2 years) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (82 - 116, n=21) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (98236 - 124155, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 148086, n=146, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6026 - 7149, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7508, n=146, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=23) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=145, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2856 - 3160, n=23) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3253, n=145, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (19105 - 25855, n=22) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=145, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2033 - 2292, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=145, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (30.7 - 43.8, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=146, last 2 years) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=144, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (33.2 - 62.1, n=22) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=147, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=22) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (28067 - 39895, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 200744, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6766 - 9734, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=145, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140937, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14415, n=22) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104217, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107195 - 136847, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 241777, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1599 - 2263, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=145, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21542, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (37482 - 62916, n=22) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=145, last 2 years) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW -6! |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (8364 - 9153, n=6) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=129, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (10423 - 11215, n=6) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (8319 - 9723, n=6) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (15780 - 19351, n=6) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=129, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (1857 - 2196, n=6) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (1764 - 2056, n=6) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (2115 - 2451, n=6) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=114, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (1466 - 2016, n=6) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=114, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (306 - 359, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=125, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (285 - 336, n=6) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=114, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (405 - 432, n=6) | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8511 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (56003 - 94460, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55795 - 97151, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (55663 - 106063, n=22) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=145, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 161.6, n=22) | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=145, last 2 years) | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
在合成 3DMarks 中,我们的 Helios 18GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑落后于平均水平约 3%;微星 Raider A18 则落后于平均水平约 3%。 微星 Raider A18则要快 8%。 在电池模式下,3D 性能损失高达 85%!
游戏测试中的情况也类似:我们的Helios 18在全高清模式下的表现与 Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1但 微星 Vector A18 HX与 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑甚至比两款配备 RTX 5080 的游戏本领先 8% 至 9%!配备 RTX 4090 的 Helios 18 前代笔记本电脑在所有游戏中的速度仅慢 4%。在 QHD 游戏中,差异甚至更大。
Helios 18 在全高清和 QHD 下感觉特别舒适。例如,《 博德之门 3 》在 4K 下以 7 fps 的速度崩溃,而其他一些游戏,如F1 25或《赛博朋克 2077》,在 4K 下运行不再流畅。我们的 "赛博朋克 "图表显示,一方面,随着时间的推移会丢失一些帧,另一方面,微星 Vector 17 虽然 GPU 性能较弱,但速度至少与之相当。
有些游戏,如 QHD 版的《F1 25》,如果原生运行不再完全流畅,仍可通过 DLSS 得到提升。
3DMark 11 Performance | 45446 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 72956 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 37168 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 18607 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=131, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW | |
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=130, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 | |
Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (79.6 - 104, n=12) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Average of class Gaming (24.8 - 120.5, n=112, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset DLSS4 quality no FG | |
Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (89 - 119, n=9) | |
MSI Vector 17 HX AI A2XWIG | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Average of class Gaming (58.9 - 136.6, n=30, last 2 years) |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 185.9 | 184.6 | 181.3 | 146.1 | 143.9 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 201 | 177.5 | 173.2 | 158.3 | 155.9 | |||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 233 | 220 | 176.3 | 144.5 | ||||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 145.8 | 131.1 | 105.1 | 90.8 | ||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 600 | 456 | 406 | 371 | 278 | 148.9 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 232 | 206 | 182.4 | 178 | 181 | 123 | 30.6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 176.3 | 170.3 | 150.4 | 139.6 | 103.8 | 94.6 | 62.2 | 42 |
F1 25 (2025) | 177.7 | 176.1 | 169.9 | 44.3 | 48.7 | 27.3 | 24.8 | 12.8 |
排放与能源 - 400 W 电源装置!
噪音排放
在涡轮增压和高性能模式下,Helios 的风扇在怠速运转时已不时发出明显的声响。
在负载情况下,约 50 分贝的噪音处于比较范围的低端,因此有更大噪音的玩家。在 "涡轮增压 "模式下,噪音会变得非常大,最高可达 60 分贝。如果在更安静的平衡模式下游戏,3D 性能将下降约 13%。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 31.31 dB(A) |
Load |
| 40.31 / 50.33 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, R9 9955HX3D, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Phison E31 2 TB | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WD PC SN8000S 2TB | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285HX, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0) | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, R9 9955HX | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | -21% | -9% | -12% | -6% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 25.1 -5% | 25 -4% | 23.3 3% | 25.56 -7% | 22.5 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 28.6 -19% | 25 -4% | 29.8 -24% | 27.68 -15% | 26 -8% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 28.9 -20% | 39 -63% | 29.8 -24% | 27.68 -15% | 26 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.31 | 29.2 7% | 42 -34% | 29.8 5% | 31.54 -1% | 32 -2% |
Load Average * | 40.31 | 45.6 -13% | 52 -29% | 42.9 -6% | 44 -9% | 44.4 -10% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50.33 | 55.6 -10% | 53 -5% | 53.7 -7% | 58.7 -17% | 49.8 1% |
Load Maximum * | 50.33 | 45.8 9% | 55 -9% | 53.7 -7% | 58.9 -17% | 61.6 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在满载情况下,键盘会发热,尤其是键盘底部、显示屏中央位置(最高达 59 °C)。WASD 键温度适中(39 °C)。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | 8% | 13% | -7% | 11% | 3% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 48 | 49.3 -3% | 47 2% | 45.6 5% | 48.2 -0% | 46.6 3% | 43 10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 59 | 50.9 14% | 48 19% | 46 22% | 53.6 9% | 45.6 23% | 59 -0% |
Idle Upper Side * | 33 | 35.2 -7% | 29 12% | 28.9 12% | 37.2 -13% | 31.2 5% | 32 3% |
Idle Bottom * | 33 | 33.5 -2% | 33 -0% | 29.2 12% | 40.4 -22% | 28.6 13% | 34 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 62% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, MiniLED IPS, 3840x2400, 18" | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Phison E31 2 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WD PC SN8000S 2TB, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 18" | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 1x Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD-00BT7 + 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HDLB-00BT7 (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 18" | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, , IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -65% | 20% | -27% | -19% | -42% | -1% | 14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 17.3 | 41.5 -140% | 7.9 54% | 11.4 34% | 19.01 -10% | 20.8 -20% | 17.4 ? -1% | 14 ? 19% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 53.5 -133% | 11.5 50% | 39.2 -70% | 30.92 -34% | 52.8 -130% | 24.1 ? -5% | 20.1 ? 13% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.3 | 53.8 -113% | 16.6 34% | 40.2 -59% | 33.84 -34% | 54.5 -115% | 27.2 ? -8% | 26.6 ? -5% |
Load Average * | 123 | 168.5 -37% | 130 -6% | 161.2 -31% | 105.4 14% | 146.6 -19% | 126.4 ? -3% | 108 ? 12% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 244 | 298 -22% | 253 -4% | 303 -24% | 343 -41% | 285 -17% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 243 | 295 -21% | 245 -1% | 295 -21% | 330 -36% | 278 -14% | ||
Load Maximum * | 375 | 323.7 14% | 330 12% | 430.9 -15% | 354 6% | 297.3 21% | 326 ? 13% | 259 ? 31% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / Stress test
Power consumption with the external monitor
电池寿命
在亮度调低的情况下,充沛的 99 Wh 电池可提供约 4.5 至 5 小时的 WLAN 和视频运行时间,相比之下属于平均水平。
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | MSI Raider A18 HX A9WIG-080 R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Medion Erazer Beast 18 X1 MD62731 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | Asus Strix Scar 18 G835LX Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | MSI Titan 18 HX AI A2XWJG Ultra 9 285HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 99 Wh | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99 Wh | Acer Predator Helios 18 PH18-72-98MW i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -43% | 62% | 9% | -14% | -22% | -31% | 36% | |
H.264 | 260 | 347 33% | 180 -31% | 461 ? 77% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 294 | 124 -58% | 476 62% | 332 13% | 259 -12% | 229 -22% | 192 -35% | 390 ? 33% |
Load | 88 | 63 -28% | 70 -20% | 90 2% | 64 -27% | 87.2 ? -1% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 44 | 73 | ||||||
Reader / Idle | 420 | 577 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Helios 18 AI 是一款出色的游戏机,具有良好的显示效果和功能,并有很大的升级潜力。
Acer Predator Helios 18 AI
- 07/04/2025 v8
Christian Hintze
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.