结论 - 挑战性能极限
由于今年没有新的GeForce GPU,Arrow Lake Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus和 1600p OLED 显示屏是 2026 年 Alienware 16 Area-51 迄今为止仅有的两款新产品。新的 CPU 确实比之前的顶级 Core Ultra 9 275HX 快了 25%,但功耗也因此增加了 25%]。
至于显示屏,从 IPS 升级到 OLED 可以说比从酷睿 Ultra 9 升级到酷睿 Ultra 9 Plus 要明显得多。OLED 面板具有明显更高的对比度、更快的响应时间和出色的 HDR,同时还保持了对高级 Optimus、QHD+ 原生分辨率和 240 Hz 快速刷新率的支持。游戏和多媒体将特别受益于这些优势。遗憾的是,新的 OLED 和 Core Ultra 9 Plus CPU 选件是捆绑在一起的,无法分开,导致这种配置的价格非常高。
由于底盘没有改变,我们对 2025 型的大多数抱怨 的抱怨在 2026 机型上依然如故。如果配置 Core Ultra 9 Plus,本已偏高的核心温度这次会更高,达到 100 C。同时,即使对于游戏笔记本电脑来说,电池续航时间也仍然很短。不惜一切代价追求性能 "的心态一如既往地强烈,与 Alienware 的品牌形象不谋而合。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
戴尔现在已经开始出货2026 Alienware 16 Area-51,基础版酷睿 Ultra 7 和 RTX 5060 配置的起价为 1950 美元,酷睿 Ultra 9 Plus 和 RTX 5080 配置的起价为 3900 美元或更高。
Alienware 16 Area-51 于去年首次亮相,可以说是迄今为止 Alienware 最好的笔记本电脑之一。在 2026 年,由于GeForce RTX 50 系列尚未接替,该机型仅在 CPU 和显示器方面进行了小幅更新。
我们的测试机配备了 2025 版没有的新选件,包括酷睿 Ultra 9 290HX Plus CPU 和带 G-Sync 的 240 Hz 1600p OLED 雾面面板,售价仅不到 4000 美元。这些变化是否改善了用户体验或证明了新价格的合理性?
我们建议您查看我们的 2025 Alienware 16 Area-51 的评测来了解这款笔记本电脑的更多物理特性。戴尔型号的替代产品包括其他高端 16 英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16或 联想Legion Pro 7i 16 10 代.
更多 Alienware 评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
连接性
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
网络摄像头

显示屏
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 383.3 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 0.87 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
calibrated: 0.61
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 0.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
95.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
CCT: 6395 K
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Samsung 160HU05, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Alienware 16 Area-51 AU Optronics B160QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Samsung ATNA60HU01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG B160QAN02.3 (AUO7DB2), IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Samsung ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -4% | -0% | 1% | -5% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 96 -4% | 99.5 0% | 99.7 0% | 96.6 -3% | 96.5 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.2 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 95.6 | 89.2 -7% | 94.4 -1% | 98.2 3% | 84.4 -12% | 94.5 -1% |
| Response Times | -1606% | 0% | -6% | -1373% | -447% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.29 ? | 4.8 ? -1555% | 0.28 ? 3% | 0.29 ? -0% | 4.3 ? -1383% | 0.32 ? -10% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.41 ? | 7.2 ? -1656% | 0.43 ? -5% | 0.47 ? -15% | 6 ? -1363% | 6 ? -1363% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1440 ? | 1438 ? | 960 ? | 960 | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 30 | 29 3% | 31 -3% | 20 33% | ||
| Screen | -131% | -64% | -92% | -131% | -82% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 383.3 | 554 45% | 490.4 28% | 376.5 -2% | 473 23% | 394 3% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 387 | 532 37% | 498 29% | 382 -1% | 426 10% | 398 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 97 | 88 -9% | 97 0% | 96 -1% | 85 -12% | 98 1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.52 | 0.42 | 0.0084 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.87 | 2.81 -223% | 3.2 -268% | 3.67 -322% | 3.47 -299% | 2.41 -177% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.23 | 8.32 -273% | 6.04 -171% | 7.24 -225% | 7.24 -225% | 3.82 -71% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.61 | 0.65 -7% | 0.84 -38% | 0.94 -54% | 1.36 -123% | 1.41 -131% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 4.7 -488% | 1 -25% | 1.1 -38% | 3.1 -288% | 2.4 -200% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.24 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.486 88% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6395 102% | 6476 100% | 6373 102% | 6319 103% | 6832 95% | 6544 99% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1065 | 1126 | 46905 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -580% /
-345% | -21% /
-34% | -32% /
-51% | -503% /
-306% | -177% /
-147% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.15 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1440 Hz Amplitude: 30 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1440 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1440 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7901 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为 "性能 "模式,将 Alienware Command Center 设置为 "超速 "模式。超频模式是实现最高图形性能的必要条件。
处理器
酷睿 Ultra 9 290HX Plus 酷睿至尊 9 290HX Plus的单线程和多线程性能分别提高了 15% 和 25 酷睿至尊 9 275HX相比,单线程和多线程性能分别提高了 15% 和 25%。这一提升使 Arrow Lake CPU 与竞争对手 Ryzen 9 9955HX3D.
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1! | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 -1! | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -1! | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG -1! | |
| Global Average -2 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (109 - 205028, n=2129) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (569 - 810740, n=2129) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (65 - 39492, n=2082) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (2104 - 379271, n=2082) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (121 - 132315, n=2129) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (291 - 428071, n=2127) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (104 - 1442466, n=2129) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (93.4 - 8427, n=2181) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (59 - 107661, n=2129) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG (v6.92.6600) | |
| Global Average -2 (680 - 171085, n=2133) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Global Average -2 (142 - 19453, n=49) | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -1! | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (7356 - 11574, n=15) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (10135 - 11887, n=15) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (8319 - 20616, n=15) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (10505 - 19351, n=15) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (1785 - 2409, n=14) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (1599 - 2216, n=14) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (2115 - 2729, n=14) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (1464 - 2334, n=14) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (300 - 381, n=16) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (275 - 354, n=15) | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Average , NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (391 - 477, n=16) | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 11574 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
令人印象深刻的是 SK Hynix PCB01PCIe5 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘能够维持近 14000 MB/s 的传输速率,而不会出现任何节流现象。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
GeForce RTX 5080和 5090 GPU 选项与以前一样,175 W TGP 目标值没有变化。不过,较新的 2026 型号的 3DMark 结果要高出几个百分点。从 RTX 5080 升级到 RTX 5090,游戏性能预计只会提高 10%到 15%。
最值得注意的是,根据我们下面的Time Spy 结果表,在 "性能模式 "或 "平衡模式 "而不是 "超频模式 "下运行,图形性能只会分别降低 3% 和 6%。与大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑相比,性能差距比预期的要小。
| 电源配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
| 超速模式 | 22247 | 17534 | 21384 |
| 性能模式 | 21478 (-3%) | 17530 (-0%) | 20776 (-3%) |
| 平衡模式 | 20815 (-6%) | 17251 (-2%) | 20189 (-6%) |
| 电池电量 | 13861 (-38%) | 13580 (-23%) | 13818 (-35%) |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26188 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 74132 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 38655 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 21384 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 5265 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 -1! | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus -1! | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 -2! | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 -1! | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG -1! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD FSR | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 187.9 | 187.6 | 186.2 | 168.1 | 167.2 | 183.9 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 216 | 191 | 184.3 | 170.9 | 165.9 | ||||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 234 | 232 | 201 | 157.5 | 93.6 | ||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 171.5 | 154.6 | 129.5 | 101.3 | |||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 624 | 489 | 448 | 413 | 300 | 161.1 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 195.9 | 191.5 | 171.9 | 153.3 | 119.1 | 101.7 | 57.8 | 46.4 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 341 | 375 | 351 | 136.9 | 141.2 | 136.2 | 89.2 | 76.5 | 44.8 |
| Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 55 | 61 | 42 | 42 | 24 | ||||
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 85.5 | 82.5 | 69 | 58.7 | 43 | ||||
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 59 | 59 | 51 | 49 | 37 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.2 / 28.2 / 28.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 28.8 / 57.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Alienware 16 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | 4% | -16% | -21% | -20% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.1 | 23.6 -2% | 22.9 1% | 22.8 1% | 25 -8% | 25.56 -11% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.2 | 25.4 -9% | 22.9 1% | 29 -25% | 33 -42% | 30 -29% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 28.2 | 27.8 1% | 22.9 19% | 29 -3% | 34 -21% | 30 -6% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 28.3 | 28.1 1% | 26.3 7% | 29 -2% | 38 -34% | 30 -6% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 28.8 | 28.8 -0% | 27.8 3% | 47.7 -66% | 46 -60% | 53.55 -86% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 49 | 50.4 -3% | 54.2 -11% | 54.8 -12% | 47 4% | 53.5 -9% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 57.1 | 56.4 1% | 53.9 6% | 61.1 -7% | 49 14% | 54.02 5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
游戏时的热点温度会达到 40 摄氏度左右,这与我们在 2025 年的 Alienware 16 Area-51 上观察到的情况类似。平均温度略高于同类产品 联想Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10因为 Alienware 上的掌托没有那么凉爽。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.2 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Alienware 16 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -4% | -1% | -14% | -21% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 45.2 | 43.8 3% | 42.6 6% | 42.8 5% | 53 -17% | 49.2 -9% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 37.4 | 40 -7% | 41.2 -10% | 50.2 -34% | 52 -39% | 50.2 -34% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 31.6 | 35.8 -13% | 32.6 -3% | 27.6 13% | 33 -4% | 37.2 -18% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30.2 | 35.2 -17% | 32.4 -7% | 26.2 13% | 29 4% | 37.4 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在超频模式(即最大风扇模式)下运行 Prime95 压力测试时,CPU 会提升到 4.3 GHz、182 W 和 105 C(!),然后略微下降到 3.9 至 4.1 GHz 的范围,以保持 95 C 至 100 C 的低温核心温度。相比之下,在 2025 年的 Alienware 16 上运行相同的测试,CPU 平均时钟频率和温度分别为 3.6 GHz 和 92 C。很明显,Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus 将现有的 Alienware 16 冷却解决方案推向了绝对极限。
在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时,GPU 的温度与 2025 机型大致相同。不过,CPU 温度会升高几摄氏度,最高可达 82 摄氏度。
| 平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | 平均 GPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 41 | 32 |
| Prime95 压力 | 4.1 | -- | 103 | 52 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.5 | 2182 | 80 | 73 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力(平衡模式) | 1.8 | 2347 | 82 | 75 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力(性能模式) | 1.8 | 2482 | 78 | 75 |
| 赛博朋克2077压力(超速模式) | 2.1 | 2505 | 82 | 72 |
Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
如上所述,Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus 比之前的 Core Ultra 9 275HX 快 15%至 25%。无独有偶,当 CPU 承受压力时,我们的 2026 Alienware 16 比 2025 Alienware 16 的要求高出 15%至 25%。在最新的 Alienware 机型上运行 Prime95,当 Turbo Boost 最有效时,功耗约为 255 瓦;当 Turbo Boost 趋于稳定时,功耗约为 230 瓦,而去年的机型功耗仅为 200 瓦。即使不玩游戏,新机型的功耗一般也要高出至少几瓦。
纤薄的 360 瓦 GaN 交流适配器在其他方面与 2025 型号保持一致。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Alienware 16 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -11% | 18% | 32% | 46% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 23.9 | 27 -13% | 28.5 -19% | 9.9 59% | 7.1 70% | 12.6 47% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 25.2 | 33.5 -33% | 38.8 -54% | 28.6 -13% | 15.9 37% | 13.4 47% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 49.6 | 41.4 17% | 45.6 8% | 47.1 5% | 29.5 41% | 15.1 70% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 141.2 | 124.7 12% | 132.2 6% | 141.8 -0% | 124 12% | 116.3 18% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 297 | 249 16% | 319 -7% | 230 23% | 217 27% | 157.9 47% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 298 | 256 14% | 318 -7% | 253 15% | 222 26% | 156.4 48% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 372.8 | 367.2 2% | 384 -3% | 233 37% | 336 10% | 199 47% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
即使启用了 VRR 和 Optimus 并禁用了 LED,无线局域网的运行时间也与以前差不多,甚至略长了半小时。不过,不管怎么看,3 小时都不算长。
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 96 Wh | Alienware 16 Area-51 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 96 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 99 Wh | HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 Wh | MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Ultra 7 255HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -13% | 69% | 81% | 119% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 3.2 | 2.8 -13% | 5.4 69% | 5.8 81% | 7 119% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 3.1 | 8.7 | ||||
| Load (h) | 0.8 | 1.2 |
笔记本检查评级
配备 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus 的 Alienware 16 Area-51 是目前速度最快的机型。不过,对于绝大多数游戏玩家来说,CPU 马力的提升充其量只能起到微不足道的作用。
Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus
- 04/22/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4000 USD | 3.3 kg | 28.5 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,609.00 Alienware 16 Area-51 Gaming ... 2. $2,419.99 Alienware 16 Area-51 AA16250... 3. $4,199.99 Alienware 16 Area-51 Gaming ... List Price: 3500 USD | 3.3 kg | 28.5 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4200 USD | 2.6 kg | 26.65 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3800 USD | 2.8 kg | 24.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| MSI Vector 16 HX AI A2XWHG Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2000 EUR | 2.6 kg | 28.6 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3800€ | 2 kg | 14.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.




















































































