结论--高端性能,低廉价格
刀片 16 RTX 5080 售价 3500 美元,而 RTX 5090 配置售价为 4500 美元,节省了 22%。更便宜的配置在 CPU 和 GPU 方面的性能损失高达 13%,这意味着两款产品的每美元性能基本相当。尽管性能略有不同,但电池续航时间、功耗和噪音水平等特性几乎相同。
因此,RTX 5080 是否比 RX 5090 更值得购买取决于用户的偏好。由于大多数游戏都需要使用 GPU,RTX 5080 SKU 的 CPU 性能较慢,在游戏时影响不大,因此在游戏方面,RTX 5080 略胜一筹。不过,对于同时也是内容创作者或视频编辑的游戏玩家来说,这类用户可能更喜欢 RTX 5090 选项,甚至是去年的 英特尔处理器更快的处理器。
Pros
Cons
在推出刀锋 16 RTX 5080 SKU 几周后,又推出了刀锋 16 RTX 5090。 刀片 16 RTX 5090.这款低端配置也采用了速度稍慢的 Ryzen Ryzen AI 9 365,而不是 Ryzen Ryzen AI 9 HX 370,同时 1600p240 三星 OLED 显示屏保持不变。
有关 Blade 16 机箱和物理特性的更多详情,请参阅我们的 原始评论.本页重点关注 RTX 5080 配置与 RTX 5090 选项的性能对比。
更多 Razer 评论:
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
SD 读卡器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 |
交流
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 |
网络摄像头

显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 394.4 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.82 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
97.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16", 60 Hz | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 NE160QDM-NZC, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -1% | 0% | -4% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.3 | 96.1 -3% | 99.1 0% | 99.9 1% | 98.1 -1% | 99.1 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.8 | 85 -13% | 95.6 -2% | 96.4 -1% | 86.3 -12% | 89.1 -9% |
Response Times | 23% | 9% | -493% | -1654% | -1456% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.29 ? | 0.2 ? 31% | 0.24 ? 17% | 2 ? -590% | 4.3 ? -1383% | 4.6 ? -1486% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.4 ? | 0.25 ? 37% | 0.4 ? -0% | 1.98 ? -395% | 8.1 ? -1925% | 6.1 ? -1425% |
PWM Frequency | 960 ? | 960 ? | 960 | 60 | ||
PWM Amplitude * | 44 | 44 -0% | ||||
Screen | -21% | -11% | -49% | -100% | -32% | |
Brightness middle | 394.4 | 391 -1% | 418 6% | 389.97 -1% | 543 38% | 545 38% |
Brightness | 401 | 393 -2% | 420 5% | 395 -1% | 502 25% | 536 34% |
Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 98 1% | 97 0% | 86 -11% | 89 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.56 | 0.41 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.82 | 1.2 -46% | 1.07 -30% | 2 -144% | 3.41 -316% | 1.6 -95% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.82 | 3.2 -13% | 4.04 -43% | 4.1 -45% | 6.4 -127% | 4 -42% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.8 -64% | 1.12 -2% | 2.23 -103% | 3.4 -209% | 2.4 -118% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.29 96% | 2.41 91% | 2.3 96% | 2.25 98% |
CCT | 6424 101% | 6493 100% | 6417 101% | 6323 103% | 6070 107% | 6737 96% |
Contrast | 20900 | 12999 | 970 | 1329 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.07 | 1.68 | 0.66 | 0.8 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-6% | -1% /
-4% | -181% /
-116% | -586% /
-356% | -497% /
-283% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise | |
↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.15 ms rise | |
↘ 0.14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 44 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8419 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Razer Synapse 设为性能模式。
处理器
......(英文 Ryzen AI 9 365比 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370配置慢 13%。在单线程负载方面,它们则不相上下。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H -2! | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF -2! | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11462 - 20649, n=6) | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1942 - 2001, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5247 - 8070, n=6) | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (758 - 787, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (1950 - 3075, n=6) | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (293 - 306, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (160 - 270, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47754 - 71722, n=6) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (5790 - 6062, n=6) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (12627 - 15010, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2778 - 2920, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9599 - 14182, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2062 - 2100, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (18.6 - 24.5, n=6) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (50.8 - 60, n=6) | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (0.411 - 0.4272, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (17096 - 32742, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (61976 - 126955, n=6) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (2951 - 5178, n=6) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (85333 - 93045, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (11586 - 16342, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (33409 - 67374, n=6) | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47468 - 69801, n=6) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (706 - 1343, n=6) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (9061 - 17848, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (47654 - 52923, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
压力测试
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 43 | 44 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.2 | -- | 80 | 56 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.6 | 1815 | 80 | 80 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(平衡模式) | 1.7 | 1950 | 79 | 77 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力(性能模式) | 1.7 | 2227 | 81 | 79 |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 -1! | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 -4! | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop -4! | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 -4! |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
CrossMark / Overall | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8587 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (87648 - 94710, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (89012 - 103347, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (93627 - 106646, n=6) | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (103.9 - 129.8, n=6) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
刀锋 16 可配备 三星 PM9A1或 SSSTC CA6。它们在其他方面的表现非常相似,在我们的测试中都没有出现节流现象。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
从 RTX 5090配置降至 RTX 5080根据 3DMark 基准测试,从 RTX 5090 降至 RTX 5080 会导致图形性能下降高达 13%,与去年的 RTX 4090 型号相当。 去年的 RTX 4090 型号.进一步降至 RTX 5070 Ti预计将再下降 12%。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
性能模式 | 51894 | 29781 | 12570 |
平衡模式 | 48656 (-6%) | 29576 (-0%) | 12308 (-2%) |
电池电量 | 13799 (-73%) | 19722 (-33%) | 8255 (-34%) |
在平衡模式而非性能模式下运行系统,对图形性能的影响相对较小,仅为 6%。
3DMark 11 Performance | 41502 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 36436 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 17598 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
正如上面的 3DMark 结果所预测的那样,游戏性能仅略有下降。用户在玩《怪物猎人荒野行动》或《艾伦-唤醒 2 》等游戏时,与 RTX 5090 配置相比会有 15% 左右的差距,而在《刺客信条暗影》 等其他游戏中,差距会缩小到 10% 以下。
Baldur's Gate 3 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
NVIDIA Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5080 OC | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (144 - 212, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
Maingear ML-16 MK2 | |
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
NVIDIA Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5080 OC | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (69.8 - 81.1, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH | |
3840x2160 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
NVIDIA Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5080 OC | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (105.6 - 132.4, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K FSR | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 164.2 | 141.9 | 139.7 | 128.5 | 119 | ||||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 152.3 | 131.3 | 76.7 | ||||||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 118.9 | 104.3 | 84.2 | 69.6 | |||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 314 | 261 | 150 | ||||||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 163.3 | 120.7 | 105.6 | 69.8 | |||||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 111.8 | 109.8 | 94 | 85.9 | 59.6 | 34.4 | 40.9 | ||
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 99.1 | 67.2 | 57.8 | 35.4 | |||||
F1 24 (2024) | 110.3 | 77 | 65.9 | 38.8 | |||||
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 50 | 54 | 43 | 39 | 23 | ||||
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 110.7 | 101.2 | 85.1 | 53.8 | |||||
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 65.7 | 64.9 | 58.9 | 50.9 | 38.6 | ||||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 58 | 54 | 46 | 44 | 32 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.1 / 23.1 / 29.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43 / 52.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048 | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, R9 9955HX | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -7% | 1% | -7% | -8% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 24.1 -5% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 22.5 2% | 24 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.1 | 24.1 -4% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 26 -13% | 24 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.1 | 30.6 -32% | 23 -0% | 23 -0% | 26 -13% | 30.1 -30% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.2 | 30.6 -5% | 27.66 5% | 33.64 -15% | 32 -10% | 30.1 -3% |
Load Average * | 43 | 45.5 -6% | 43.76 -2% | 51.49 -20% | 44.4 -3% | 41.1 4% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 50.1 | 48.2 4% | 49.8 1% | 54.2 -8% | ||
Load Maximum * | 52.4 | 53.4 -2% | 50.37 4% | 55.24 -5% | 61.6 -18% | 54.2 -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.81 | 55.27 |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.6 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.5 °C / -15.3 F).
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | 14% | 24% | 12% | 18% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50.6 | 48.3 5% | 45 11% | 41 19% | 46.6 8% | 39.6 22% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.6 | 53.3 -10% | 45 7% | 47 3% | 45.6 6% | 49.7 -2% |
Idle Upper Side * | 35.2 | 28.3 20% | 29 18% | 23 35% | 31.2 11% | 26.3 25% |
Idle Bottom * | 37 | 30.3 18% | 30 19% | 23 38% | 28.6 23% | 27.3 26% |
* ... smaller is better
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16" | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, , IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | -47% | -11% | -121% | -38% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7 | 10.9 -56% | 16.9 -141% | 11.8 -69% | 20.8 -197% | 10.8 -54% |
Idle Average * | 15 | 13.5 10% | 17.8 -19% | 16.1 -7% | 52.8 -252% | 17.7 -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 15.4 | 13.7 11% | 19.6 -27% | 17 -10% | 54.5 -254% | 18.8 -22% |
Load Average * | 108.5 | 120.2 -11% | 128 -18% | 100.6 7% | 146.6 -35% | 139.4 -28% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 195.2 | 178.2 9% | 285 -46% | 295 -51% | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 194.8 | 177.6 9% | 278 -43% | 291 -49% | ||
Load Maximum * | 254.1 | 246.1 3% | 328 -29% | 192 24% | 297.3 -17% | 359.3 -41% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 243 | 158 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh | MSI Vector A18 HX A9W R9 9955HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 90 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 0% | -31% | -6% | -52% | -2% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 477 | 475 0% | 329 -31% | 448 -6% | 229 -52% | 469 -2% |
H.264 | 592 | 456 | 442 | 658 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 71 | 48 | ||||
Load | 79 | 126 | 88 | |||
Reader / Idle | 420 |
笔记本检查评级
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080
- 05/23/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Razer Blade 16 RTX 5080 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,599.99 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 2. $1,309.00 ASUS ROG Strix G16 Gaming La... 3. $3,099.00 Razer Blade 17 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 3500 USD | 2.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,599.99 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... 2. $4,499.99 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 3. $1,309.00 ASUS ROG Strix G16 Gaming La... List Price: 4399€ | 2.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $4,099.99 List Price: 4850 Euro | 2.5 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
Gigabyte Aero X16 1WH AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $20.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... 2. $18.98 Puccy 2 Pack Back Protector ... 3. $1,799.00 GIGABYTE AERO 16 OLED: 16" 1... List Price: 1799€ | 2 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
MSI Vector A18 HX A9W AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $4,203.16 List Price: 3200 USD | 3.5 kg | 32.05 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,309.00 ASUS ROG Strix G16 Gaming La... 2. $52.99 A-Tech 16GB Kit (2x8GB) RAM ... 3. $1,599.00 ASUS ROG Strix G16 Gaming La... List Price: 3299€ | 2.6 kg | 30.8 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.