结论--得益于 GPU 性能的提升，ROG Zephyrus G14 是速度最快的 14 英寸设备
华硕为其 ROG Zephyrus G14 的新 2025 型号配备了速度更快的 GPU 选项，这样做消除了其前代产品的一个问题，即最多只能配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑。新的 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑实现了性能上的重大飞跃。不过，它的散热系统也需要进行调整，这就是为什么这款笔记本电脑的机箱背面比以前厚了 2 毫米。尽管如此，它的风扇在游戏时还是会发出很大的声音，机箱也会变得相对较热。AMD 芯片的 CPU 性能也非常不错。
笔记本电脑的 120 Hz OLED 面板没有变化，仍然具有出色的画质，动作流畅，色彩鲜艳，响应速度快。它的弱点是最大亮度值有点低（SDR 和 HDR）和 PWM 闪烁--尽管我们注意到频率相当高。它的电池续航时间略有改善，在连接性、输入设备或扬声器方面也没有太多值得抱怨的地方。
不过，新的 GPU 选项也给我们带来了一点批评，因为如果制造商已经努力安装了 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑，我们就不明白为什么华硕没有额外发布一款配备 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的机型。这样一来，他们终于可以在 GPU 性能方面用 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑取代旧的 2023 型号，而这正是 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑所无法企及的。对于某些用户来说，额外的 VRAM 肯定也是一个优势。
有了 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑和 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑这两款强大的 GPU 可供选择，新款 ROG Zephyrus G14 目前已经相当无敌，因为普通的 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑明显要慢一些。我们很好奇其他厂商（如 Razer）是否也会效仿。
Pros
Cons
华硕更新了 ROG Zephyrus G14，解决了前代产品最大的诟病之一，前代产品没有最快的 GPU 选项，而是采用了更轻薄的设计，最多配备 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑。而老款 2023 机型此前也有 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑可供选择。新的 2025 机型外壳略厚，结合了 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370与新的 GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑.现在，买家还可以选择 64 GB 内存。
我们测试了新款 ROG Zephyrus G14 G403 的顶级型号，它配备了 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370、新款 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑（最大 TGP 120 瓦）和 64 GB 内存。其 OLED 面板具有 2.8K 分辨率和 120 Hz 刷新率，与前代产品相比没有任何变化。 前代产品.
规格
外壳 - 一体成型金属机身，厚度增加 2 毫米
总体而言，该设备的外壳设计与 2024 型号包括屏幕盖上的斜线照明。一体式金属外壳的质量和做工仍然令人印象深刻，但我们的深灰色机型对指纹痕迹相当敏感。白色版本也再次推出。
最大的创新是 2025 型号有两种不同的外壳款式。配备 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑的机型使用与 2024 机型完全相同的机箱，但配备 RTX 5070 Ti 笔记本电脑和 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑的功能更强大的机型背面加厚了 2 毫米。这是由于改进了散热，风扇也略微加大，以实现更高的功率极限。热管和风扇配置也做了一些额外的改动。不过，我们稍后会详细介绍。这些变化还导致重量增加了约 100 克（1.58 对 1.48 千克）。
连接性 - USB 4.0 和 Wi-Fi 7
它的连接性没有任何变化，可以满足日常使用的所有重要标准。用户仍然无法使用 Thunderbolt，但由于该设备配备了 USB 4.0 端口，这并不是什么大问题。由于采用了 AMD 芯片的快速 NPU，这是一款支持微软高级人工智能功能的 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑。左侧的 USB-C 端口通过 iGPU 连接，因此你可以在这里连接外接显示器，而无需自动激活专用的 Nvidia GPU。
Wi-Fi 模块支持 Wi-Fi 7 和蓝牙 5.4。在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中，其传输速率非常好，信号质量也没有问题。笔记本电脑的 1080p 网络摄像头只能拍摄普通照片，没有快门功能，但支持 Studio Effects。通过 Windows Hello 进行面部识别的红外摄像头已安装到位，该设备的 microSD 读卡器速度仍然很快。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY (Angelibrid AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 204, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY (Angelibrid AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
维护
在胶粘的橡胶脚垫下有两颗隐藏的螺丝，这使得接触组件变得更加困难。在内部，您可以接触到 M.2 2280 固态硬盘、无线局域网模块、风扇和旋入式电池。
可持续性
华硕没有提供任何有关该笔记本电脑二氧化碳排放量或使用可回收材料的信息。其包装几乎完全由纸张/纸板组成。
输入设备 - 出色的键盘
华硕笔记本电脑的输入设备不变 不变其键盘（1.7 毫米行程）依然给人留下深刻印象，打字体验非常精确、舒适。这是笔记本电脑市场上最好的键盘之一。它的背光可以调节，但只有一个区域。ClickPad 键盘手感舒适顺滑，能发出低沉、高质量的点击声。不过，我们注意到左侧区域有轻微的晃动，让人感觉有点摇摇欲坠。
显示屏 - 120 Hz、2.8K OLED、G-Sync
与 2024 型号相比，它的显示屏没有任何变化，因为它采用了三星的同款面板 (ATNA40CU05-0)。 我们对前一代产品的评测详细介绍。反射式面板（无触摸屏）的图像质量仍然非常出色，出厂配置文件也非常准确，可用于 P3 和 sRGB 色彩空间。它的弱点包括反光、PWM 闪烁（尽管频率较高）和略低的最大亮度值（SDR 和 HDR）。其他 OLED 笔记本电脑在这方面提供了更多。
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14", 165 Hz | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) BOE CQ NE145F8M-NY1, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5", 165 Hz | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 TL140ADXP04-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 14", 240 Hz | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) TL140ADXP24-0, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -22% | -3% | -17% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.6 | 99.6 0% | 65 -35% | 96.9 -3% | 70.3 -29% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 95.3 -5% | 99.8 0% | 97.4 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 89.9 | 93.4 4% | 66.8 -26% | 85 -5% | 72.4 -19% |
| Response Times | -1188% | -770% | -995% | -4814% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.62 ? | 17.2 ? -2674% | 5.4 ? -771% | 6 ? -868% | 38.5 ? -6110% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.68 ? | 9.9 ? -1356% | 5.9 ? -768% | 8.3 ? -1121% | 24.6 ? -3518% |
| PWM Frequency | 960 ? | 5430 466% | |||
| Screen | -29% | -668% | -532% | -213% | |
| Brightness middle | 423 | 535 26% | 450 6% | 484.1 14% | 325 -23% |
| Brightness | 424 | 563 33% | 433 2% | 466 10% | 317 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 91 -7% | 87 -11% | 89 -9% | 94 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.01 | 0.45 -4400% | 0.38 -3700% | 0.12 -1100% | |
| Contrast | 42300 | 1000 -98% | 1274 -97% | 2708 -94% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.7 | 1 -43% | 2.26 -223% | 2.23 -219% | 1.8 -157% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.8 | 2.8 -56% | 7.5 -317% | 4.57 -154% | 3.4 -89% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 1.8 -125% | 3.2 -300% | 1.6 -100% | 2.5 -213% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.214 99% | 2.24 98% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6505 100% | 6337 103% | 6121 106% | 6816 95% | 7017 93% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.21 | 0.74 | 1.4 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -405% /
-311% | -487% /
-534% | -510% /
-481% | -1681% /
-876% |
* ... smaller is better
性能 - AMD Zen 5 和 64GB 内存
华硕再次采用 AMD 处理器，但 2025 机型的最大内存容量增加了一倍，达到 64 GB。不过，它仍然采用焊接式内存（LPDDR5x-8000）。
测试条件
华硕提供了所有我们熟悉的能耗配置文件（安静、高性能、涡轮加速），我们在涡轮加速模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量。性能模式是电池模式下的最大值。
| 能源概况 | CPU TDP | CB 2024 Multi | GPU TGP | Time Spy 图形 | CP 2077 QHD Ultra | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 65/35 瓦 | 1,103 分 | 45 瓦 | 7,573 分 | 39.7fps | 42 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 65/45 瓦 | 1,169 分 | 95 瓦 | 14,971 分 | 74.9fps | 52.1 dB(A) |
| 涡轮 | 80 瓦 | 1,254 分 | 110 瓦 | 16,644 分 | 79.6fps | 54.4 dB(A) |
| 电池（性能） | 40/31 瓦 | 1,059 分 | 43 瓦 | 6,559 分 | 33fps | 36 dB(A) |
还有一个手动模式，可以将 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑的 TGP 增加到 120 瓦。同时，CPU 和 GPU 都有三种预设风扇曲线，但在我们看来，这些曲线并不实用。尽管功率限制较高，但即使选择了最激进的预设风扇曲线，风扇也会保持较低的噪音，此外，在负载情况下，笔记本的机箱温度会升高几度，性能也不会保持稳定，这意味着其游戏性能最终会比使用Turbo模式时更差。当然，你也可以手动调节风扇曲线，但确实应该有一个合适的预设值，使设备性能保持稳定。
处理器
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370配备 12 个 Zen 5 内核，在我们的测试中取得了非常出色的性能，这要归功于其 80 瓦的高功率限制。此外，它们在长时间负载的情况下仍能保持稳定。在我们的对比组中，新款 G14 拔得头筹，与 酷睿至尊 9 285H在较大的 ROG Zephyrus G16尽管它的短期功耗高达 100 瓦。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (331 - 2298, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (621 - 1284, n=25) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average of class Gaming (68.2 - 138.2, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (113.6 - 121, n=15) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40951, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (10435 - 23902, n=25) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1921 - 2049, n=18) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2260, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 15881, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (6449 - 9280, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (753 - 804, n=17) | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 869, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=149, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2498 - 3551, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (293 - 315, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 343, n=146, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (139 - 192, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23795 - 144064, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (66154 - 83714, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (5859 - 6497, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11973 - 15994, n=20) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (2780 - 2965, n=20) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3219, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (11394 - 15759, n=18) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1957 - 2160, n=18) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 28.7, n=17) | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (46.8 - 66.6, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (0.3892 - 0.529, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37804, n=16) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 147937, n=17) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5926, n=17) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41744 - 99088, n=17) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19115, n=17) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 32988, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 93798, n=16) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67015 - 118806, n=17) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=17) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20648, n=17) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 51727, n=17) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62274, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
系统性能
新款 Zephyrus G14 在系统基准测试中也名列前茅，这款小巧的笔记本电脑在日常使用中反应非常灵敏。只有在切换显卡时（如开始游戏时），我们才注意到短暂的卡顿，但这与当前依靠高级 Optimus GPU 切换技术的状况相符。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=109, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=124, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=111, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (404 - 674, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8012 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 93640, n=17) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84635 - 102937, n=17) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 102937, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (83907 - 108954, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 108954, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (87.2 - 119.4, n=17) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试（上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载）中，我们的测试设备在使用当前 BIOS 版本进行实时音频应用时没有出现任何限制。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Zephyrus G14 依然配备了一个 PCIe 4.0 连接的 M.2 2280 SSD 插槽。我们的测试设备使用的是 2 TB 版本的 WD SN740（用户可使用 1.73 TB），它在测试过程中实现了不错的传输速率。此外，虽然市场上也有速度更快的硬盘，但即使在持续负载的情况下，其性能也能保持稳定。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
我们的测试设备配备了 GeForce RTX 5080 笔记本电脑(16GB VRAM），它是 110 瓦版本（85 瓦 + 25 瓦 Dynamic Boost）。在手动模式下，它甚至可以达到 120 瓦（95 瓦 + 25 瓦）。当然，RTX 5080 Laptop 的全部性能（最大 175 瓦）并不能因此发挥出来，例如，Strix G16 在基准测试中几乎快了 20%。
尽管如此，与配备了 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑相比，它的性能提升是巨大的（+31%），但配备 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑(125 瓦）在几乎所有测试中仍然遥遥领先。遗憾的是，华硕没有提供配备 5090 笔记本电脑的机型，尽管其 110 瓦的 TGP 可以轻松实现。在我们的 图形处理器分析中，我们发现 RTX 5090 笔记本电脑的图形处理速度比 TGP 为 115 瓦的 RTX 5080 笔记本电脑快近 14%。
其图形性能在持续负载下保持完全稳定，但 GPU 在电池模式下最多只能消耗 43 瓦（Time Spy Graphics 中为 -60%）。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 39151 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 32734 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 15055 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 4057 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 18131 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 17535 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (9.9 - 95, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (11.6 - 17, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 110, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (18 - 23, n=4) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average of class Gaming (122 - 962, n=144, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (123 - 208, n=5) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Photoshop PugetBench - Overall Score 1.01 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Premiere Pro PugetBench - Overall Score 1.1 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
游戏性能
考虑到其小巧的尺寸，这款笔记本电脑的游戏性能非常出色，目前在 14 英寸的细分市场中还没有更快的设备。在这种情况下，即使是搭载 RTX 4090 笔记本电脑的老款 G14 也刚刚被超越。RTX 5080 笔记本电脑可以在 QHD 分辨率的屏幕上流畅显示所有现代游戏。正如我们在其他测试中已经看到的那样，事实证明该 GPU 在 1080p 测试中有些力不从心，更适合 QHD 分辨率。其游戏性能也完全保持稳定。
只有在完全光线追踪/路径追踪的情况下，才需要使用 DLSS 升频甚至帧生成技术，我们在 2560 x 1600 像素的《赛博朋克 2077》和《艾伦-威克 2》两款游戏中进行了尝试。
| 设置 | Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty RT Overdrive |
Alan Wake 2 自定义 （所有高/超高速 + PT） |
|---|---|---|
| 原生 | 16fps | 25fps |
| DLSS 质量 | 34fps | 42fps |
| DLSS 性能 | 52.3fps | 56.2fps |
| DLSS 质量 MFG x2 | 60.1fps | 74.7fps |
| DLSS 质量 MFG x4 | 107.8fps | 131.1fps |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 158, n=102, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (34.5 - 246, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 168.2, n=124, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 434, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U | |
| SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) | |
| Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) | |
| Alan Wake 2 - 2560x1440 High Preset | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (60.3 - 83.8, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (22.5 - 87.1, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (66.1 - 115.9, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (72.4 - 102.4, n=4) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 6 - 2560x1440 Extreme Preset | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (73 - 109, n=2) | |
| Average of class Gaming (60 - 119, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows - 2560x1440 Ultra High | |
| Asus ROG Strix G16 G615 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (41 - 55, n=4) | |
| Average of class Gaming (30 - 56, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW | |
| Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 124.8 | 120.6 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 171.5 | 155.7 | 145.8 | 134.2 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 194.4 | 175.6 | 146 | 118.8 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 107 | 98.4 | 76.9 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 408 | 352 | 323 | 299 | 235 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 172.8 | 159.8 | 144.9 | 144 | 106.9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 125.1 | 122.3 | 118.4 | 109.9 | 89 | 79.6 |
| Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 92.2 | 89.7 | 83.8 | 60.3 | ||
| F1 24 (2024) | 225 | 103.6 | 66.8 | |||
| Call of Duty Black Ops 6 (2024) | 155 | 143 | 106 | 99 | 98 | 73 |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 142.4 | 109 | 95.7 | 86.8 | 72.4 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 91 | 81 | 68 | 48 | 41 |
排放 - 风扇噪音大
与 2024 型号（或较慢的 2025 型号）相比，华硕对该设备的散热系统进行了重大调整，并做出了一些改动。对于快速 GPU 而言，最重要的变化包括：主热管更大（直径从 6 毫米变为 8 毫米），VRAM 模块增加了一个热管，并取消了第三个风扇。在性能较弱的机型上，该风扇通过键盘区域吸入新鲜空气，然后吹到热管上。改进后的散热系统现在使用两个更厚的风扇，每个风扇都有一个通向内部区域的小开口，从而将冷空气导入热管。
噪音排放
在日常使用中，我们始终建议使用静音模式，因为此时风扇通常会完全关闭。而在 "涡轮增压"模式下，即使是在空转时，背景噪音也始终在 29 分贝（A）左右。在这种情况下，轻微的脉动现象让我们有些困扰。在负载模式下，笔记本电脑的噪音很快就会达到 54 分贝（A），因此玩游戏时一定要戴上耳机。性能模式下的噪音为 52 dB(A)，好不了多少--要想达到最安静的效果，你必须使用安静模式（最大 42 dB(A)）。我们的测试设备上没有其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 29.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 54.4 / 54.4 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A) | ||
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 9 185H, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 8945HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 14% | 6% | -1% | 14% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 23.3 | 23.9 -3% | 23.3 -0% | 24 -3% | 24.3 -4% | 25.5 -9% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.1 | 23.9 18% | 23.6 19% | 29 -0% | 25 14% | 25.5 12% |
| Idle Average * | 29.1 | 23.9 18% | 23.6 19% | 31 -7% | 25 14% | 26.5 9% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.1 | 23.9 18% | 33 -13% | 36 -24% | 25 14% | 30.3 -4% |
| Load Average * | 54.4 | 46.2 15% | 49.5 9% | 47 14% | 33 39% | 49.3 9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54.4 | 50 8% | 57.8 -6% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 54.4 | 46.2 15% | 52.2 4% | 52 4% | 51.9 5% | 57.8 -6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 46.2 | 52.2 | 49.5 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
我们在执行简单任务时没有发现温度问题，但在高负载情况下，不应将设备放在大腿上。在底部，我们测得背面区域的温度约为 50 °C，键盘上方的温度甚至达到 51 °C。不过，键盘本身的温度仍然较低，尤其是重要的 WASD 区域。在压力测试中，图形处理器的功率稳定在 85 瓦，而处理器的功率为 35 瓦。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.2 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.3 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.4 °C / 99.3 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.5 °C / -15.3 F).
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 9% | 10% | -8% | -1% | -5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51.2 | 46.6 9% | 47 8% | 57 -11% | 41.8 18% | 43.1 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 50.3 | 47.8 5% | 46.5 8% | 55 -9% | 42.2 16% | 51.3 -2% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30.2 | 26.7 12% | 25.9 14% | 32 -6% | 34.8 -15% | 33.2 -10% |
| Idle Bottom * | 30.9 | 27.8 10% | 28 9% | 33 -7% | 37.4 -21% | 38.3 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
在我们的音频分析中，配备四个模块的笔记本电脑音响系统的表现略逊于其前代产品 前代但其音质还是非常不错的。
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.9% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 70% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
闲置模式下的功耗与之前大致相同，但在负载情况下，笔记本电脑的功耗限制会有所提高。我们在游戏时测得的功耗约为 160-165 瓦，在压力测试中，功耗在短暂达到 218 瓦后稳定在这一水平。不过，由于无需从电池中获取电能，因此所提供的 200 瓦电源大小足够。该设备在关机和待机模式下的低功耗也是一个优点。
| Off / Standby | 0.12 / 0.13 Watt |
| Idle | 6.7 / 8.8 / 9.3 Watt |
| Load |
121.5 / 218.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14" | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.5" | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | -25% | -17% | -123% | -1% | -99% | -85% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.7 | 6.9 -3% | 9.4 -40% | 6 10% | 20.9 -212% | 5.8 13% | 15.3 ? -128% | 13.9 ? -107% |
| Idle Average * | 8.8 | 8.6 2% | 14.2 -61% | 11 -25% | 25.6 -191% | 10.8 -23% | 21.8 ? -148% | 19.8 ? -125% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 9 3% | 14.5 -56% | 21 -126% | 32.1 -245% | 11.1 -19% | 24.6 ? -165% | 27.3 ? -194% |
| Load Average * | 121.5 | 75.2 38% | 79 35% | 93 23% | 72.7 40% | 87.4 28% | 131 ? -8% | 104.8 ? 14% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 157.4 | 147.9 6% | 175.3 -11% | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 155.5 | 146.3 6% | 169.1 -9% | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 218.1 | 161.6 26% | 220.8 -1% | 252 -16% | 228.4 -5% | 183 16% | 320 ? -47% | 250 ? -15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 109.7 | 172 | 182.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
这款笔记本电脑的电池容量仍为 73 Wh，但整体运行时间略优于旧款机型。 旧型号.我们的 WLAN 测试持续了 10:27（150 尼特）或 7:39 小时，使新款 G14 在我们的对比组中名列前茅。它的视频播放时间甚至长达近 15 个小时。在设备打开的情况下，充满电需要 97 分钟；只需 45 分钟就能恢复 80% 的电量。
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 73 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2024 GA403U R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Acer Predator Helios Neo 14 (2024) Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Razer Blade 14 RZ09-0508 R9 8945HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 68 Wh | SCHENKER Key 14 (M24) Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -17% | -36% | -11% | -22% | -28% | -28% | |
| H.264 | 898 | 725 -19% | 431 -52% | 555 -38% | 461 ? -49% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 627 | 555 -11% | 448 -29% | 519 -17% | 428 -32% | 454 -28% | 385 ? -39% |
| Load | 81 | 64 -21% | 58 -28% | 100 23% | 72 -11% | 84.5 ? 4% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 2025 GA403WW
- 05/09/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
