结论 -Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 有两大弱点
三星Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 Copilot+ 是一款可靠的日常笔记本电脑，已在商店上市，售价不到 700 美元。纤薄的铝制外壳给人留下了良好的印象，并提供了充足的连接和快速的 microSD 读卡器。此外，还安装了现代的 Wi-Fi 7 适配器。键盘是薄弱环节之一；除了行程有限外，按键还是很精确的，但我们不明白三星为什么在键盘照明上吝啬。
在性能方面，高通公司的 Snapdragon 处理器可提供不错的 CPU 性能，但 GPU 性能较弱。此外，能耗配置文件也不是特别有用，因为两个较弱的配置文件都会大幅降低性能，这在日常使用中很明显。不过，积极的一面是，与应用程序的兼容性得到了改善。不过，潜在买家仍应检查所需的应用程序是否能在骁龙机型上运行。
屏幕是非常简单的 IPS 显示屏，但并不需要太多的电量。在我们的 WLAN 测试中，根据亮度的不同，可以使用 13-18 个小时。不过，第二个主要问题是内存配置，因为三星再次决定只焊接 UFS 内存，而不是像英特尔机型那样安装 M.2 SSD。在我们的测试设备中，用户只能使用 160 GB。
Pros
Cons
- $629.00SAMSUNG Galaxy Book4 Edge Laptop 15.6" FHD Anti-Glare Qualcomm 8-core Snapdragon X (Up to 45 Tops) 16GB RAM 512GB SSD for Creator Designer Business Professional Win11 ICP Hub w/Copilot+ AI
- $10.99KEANBOLL 3-Pack Designed for 15.6” Samsung Galaxy Book5 & Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15.6-Inch Laptop Screen Protector, Anti Glare and Anti Fingerprint (Matte) Shield
根据三星的命名方案，Edge 代表采用高通公司 ARM 处理器的笔记本电脑。新款Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 Copilot+ 是一款经济实惠的日常电脑，售价不到 700 欧元。为此，您可以获得 骁龙 X1P-42-100配备 Wi-Fi 7，但只有 16 GB 内存和 256 GB 固态硬盘。
规格
箱子和设备
三星为Galaxy Book4 Edge 采用了纤薄的金属外壳，厚度为 1.5 厘米，重量为 1.49 千克，可以轻松放入任何背包。外壳颜色为蓝宝石蓝色，是一种非常浅的蓝色（相当银色，略带蓝色）。从外观上看，这款笔记本非常漂亮，质量也不错。只是显示屏铰链（最大开启角度为 180 度）有些过于光滑，因此会有轻微晃动。下机箱盖可以拆卸（橡胶脚下有螺丝），但维护选项仅限于清洁风扇、WLAN 模块和电池，必要时可以更换电池。
我们也不能抱怨连接方面的问题。有 2 个 USB-C 4.0 接口、一个普通 USB 接口和一个 HDMI 接口。microSD 读卡器的传输速率不错，但弹簧机构的止动点位于外壳的很深处。你需要用长指甲或尖头物体才能插入或取出卡。三星在 WLAN 模块上毫不吝啬，安装了高通公司最新的 7800 适配器，其中包括 Wi-Fi 7。传输速率非常好且稳定。这是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑，支持所有微软人工智能功能，以及网络摄像头的 Studio 特效。不过，1080p 传感器（不含红外模块）只能拍摄出一般的照片。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Office (22.4 - 198.5, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=26, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
输入设备 - 键盘无照明
宽大的键盘包括一个数字键盘，按键精准。不过，键程较浅是Galaxy-Book 系列的典型特点，这也是你应该提前试用键盘的原因。在布局方面，你必须习惯右上方的小方向键和电源键（包括指纹扫描仪），实际上你会在那里找到删除键。不过，最大的问题是没有背光，这对某些用户来说可能是个障碍。
总的来说，ClickPad 的使用没有任何问题，而且尺寸也足够大（12 x 8.5 厘米）。不过，下半部分的机械咔哒声有点太大。
显示屏 - 60 赫兹的简易 IPS 面板
三星在显示屏上采用了红铅笔，因为只有一个非常简单的 IPS 显示屏，频率为 60 Hz，色彩空间覆盖率较低。磨砂面板的画质基本尚可，即使在明亮的表面也不会出现画面颗粒感的问题。响应时间不明显，也没有 PWM 闪烁。
亮度为 300 cd/m2，黑色值为 0.26cd/m2，因此对比度仍为 1,200:1 左右。这对于室内使用是足够的，但在非常明亮的环境或室外很难舒适地工作。色彩空间覆盖率很低，出厂配置文件也不是特别准确。除了明显偏蓝和色温过低之外，还有明显的色彩偏差。该面板不适合图像编辑。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 304 cd/m²
Contrast: 1169:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
46.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
63.1% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
46.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
CCT: 7873 K
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 NV156FHM-NS0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 60 Hz | Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR BOE0CEA, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 LEN153WUXGA , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core ATNA56AC03-0, , 2880x1620, 15.6", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R LEN153WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -5% | |||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 46.5 | 45.56 -2% | 42.9 -8% | ||
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 63.1 | 65.46 4% | 61.2 -3% | ||
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 46.7 | 46.75 0% | 44.4 -5% | ||
| Response Times | 23% | 14% | 5% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 31.5 ? | 24 ? 24% | 28.2 ? 10% | 29.1 ? 8% | |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20.4 ? | 16 ? 22% | 16.8 ? 18% | 20.2 ? 1% | |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | -9% | -7% | 9% | ||
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 304 | 308 1% | 328 8% | 328.3 8% | |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 298 | 305 2% | 315 6% | 313 5% | |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 97 3% | 91 -3% | 92 -2% | |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.29 -12% | 0.29 -12% | 0.24 8% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1169 | 1062 -9% | 1131 -3% | 1368 17% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 6 -11% | 6.4 -19% | 5.64 -4% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.5 | 20.96 -35% | 21.5 -39% | 19.24 -24% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.5 | 6.05 -10% | 5 9% | 2.1 62% | |
| Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2 110% | 2.42 91% | 2.12 104% | |
| CCT | 7873 83% | 7147 91% | 6596 99% | 6757 96% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.93 | 3.13 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
-2% | 4% /
-3% | 3% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 31.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 41 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8170 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - 不带涡轮增压的骁龙系统
测试条件
我们在高性能模式下进行了基准测试。其他两种模式（优化、静音）会大幅降低 CPU 性能，因此在日常使用中也会出现性能限制（系统明显感觉缓慢，输入数据时有时会出现挂起/延迟）。
处理器 - Snapdragon X Plus
高通 高通骁龙 X1P-42-100提供 8 个内核，最高主频为 3.4 GHz。不过，X1P-42-100 并不支持更昂贵机型的 CPU 升频。骁龙处理器的功耗仍无法读取。不过，根据我们的功耗测量，CPU 的功耗应在 35 瓦左右（后来为 30 瓦）。CPU/GPU 的综合负载会导致约 40-45 瓦的功耗。
在原生 CPU 基准测试中，整体性能尚可，日常使用中没有问题。我们还在下面列出了模拟基准测试。在电池模式下，CPU 性能仅下降约 10%。
Cinebench R15 多回路
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6062 - 8284, n=9) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1065 - 1134, n=9) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2361 - 3125, n=9) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Average of class Office (285 - 815, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (406 - 425, n=9) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1191 - 1560, n=9) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (206 - 215, n=9) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (398 - 683, n=9) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (29238 - 32811, n=9) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Average of class Office (3046 - 6497, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4087 - 4675, n=9) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (3.16 - 6.18, n=9) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (55.3 - 62.7, n=9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average of class Office (41.5 - 129.6, n=75, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (0.728 - 0.777, n=9) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.06, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1480 - 6208, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (14234 - 17585, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5398, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2036 - 2614, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (44346 - 48581, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1240 - 1502, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4929 - 9929, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (37646 - 45232, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (473 - 523, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2262 - 3430, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (11090 - 55359, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (31088 - 32224, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
系统性能
Galaxy Book4 在系统基准测试中表现良好，测试过程中没有出现稳定性问题。应用程序的兼容性在不断改进，但您应该事先检查所需的应用程序是否能在 ARM 版本的 Windows 上运行。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -4! | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1061 - 1463, n=9) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1059 - 1284, n=9) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average of class Office (319 - 2155, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1070 - 1660, n=9) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 1877, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (989 - 1563, n=9) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (129.9 - 426, n=9) | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (130.3 - 284, n=9) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (396 - 1145, n=9) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (61258 - 62755, n=8) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Average of class Office (20075 - 108783, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (123557 - 128030, n=8) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (10084 - 128030, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Average of class Office (20073 - 117935, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (45782 - 48716, n=8) | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
DPC 延迟
我们无法在 ARM 笔记本电脑上进行通常的延迟测试，但在播放 4K YouTube 视频时没有出现跳帧问题。
大容量存储器
三星依靠的是 256 GB UFS 内存，它是焊接在板上的。与使用 M.2 2280 固态硬盘的英特尔Galaxy Books 相比，这是一个很大的劣势。虽然传输速率尚可，但在初始启动后，用户只能用 160 GB 来存储自己的文件。
* ... smaller is better
连续读取DiskSpd 循环读取，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
钛 Adreno X1-45是一款性能相对较弱的集成显卡，几乎不适合玩游戏。如果你想玩游戏，应该依靠云服务。不过，它的性能完全可以胜任播放高分辨率视频等日常任务。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4590 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3752 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1070 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1088 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (711 - 1226, n=12) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Average of class Office (245 - 3964, n=74, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 -2! | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR -1! | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core -1! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Office (6.13 - 29.6, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Office (6.45 - 36.5, n=71, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Office (12.9 - 62, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR | |
| Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Office (10.9 - 92.6, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 92.8 | 87.1 | 33.4 | 15 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 85.3 | 67.8 | 57.8 | 49.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 38.3 | 15.7 | 15.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38.5 | 30.8 | 27.3 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 84 | 30 | 23 | 20 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 16 | 15 | 13 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.2 | 11 | 9.5 | 9.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 15 | 11.8 | 9.8 | 8.4 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
只要处理器负载不高，单风扇就会非常安静。因此，在日常使用中，你几乎听不到Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 的声音。游戏时，我们测得的噪音约为 32 dB(A)，但风扇的声音有些高。在压力测试中，它的噪音甚至高达 42.8 dB(A)（优化：4 dB(A)，静音：4 dB(A)）： 36.4 dB(A)，静音：31.6 dB(A)）。我们的测试设备没有检测到其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.8 / 24.8 / 24.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 25.2 / 42.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.8 dB(A) | ||
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1334U, Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, SK hynix PVC10 HFS256GEM4X182N | Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Core 5 210H, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | 2% | 9% | -17% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.8 | 25.1 -1% | 24 3% | 23.7 4% | 27.3 -10% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.8 | 25.1 -1% | 24 3% | 23.7 4% | 27.3 -10% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.8 | 26.7 -8% | 24 3% | 23.7 4% | 27.3 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.8 | 29.3 -18% | 24 3% | 23.7 4% | 29 -17% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 25.2 | 23.7 6% | 42 -67% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 32.2 | 33.3 -3% | 29.7 8% | 35.1 -9% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 42.8 | 43 -0% | 42.7 -0% | 29.7 31% | 41.5 3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在高负荷情况下，表面温度也能始终保持安全。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR Intel Core i5-1334U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -18% | -6% | -16% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 38.9 | 38.7 1% | 38.2 2% | 41.8 -7% | 34.2 12% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 42.4 | 41.5 2% | 39.2 8% | 49.9 -18% | 38.8 8% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 24.3 | 32.1 -32% | 27.7 -14% | 28.8 -19% | 28.6 -18% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 24.3 | 35.1 -44% | 28.6 -18% | 29.1 -20% | 31.4 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
考虑到价格，两个立体声扬声器给人的印象相当不错，但低音不足。
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 78% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 总体而言是一款非常高效的笔记本电脑，尤其是在低负载情况下。我们在压力测试中测得的最大功率略低于 57 瓦，因此附带的 65 瓦电源足够大。
| Off / Standby | 0.24 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 2.7 / 5.8 / 7 Watt |
| Load |
19.4 / 56.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1334U, Kingston OM8PGP4512Q-A0 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, SK hynix PVC10 HFS256GEM4X182N | Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQD-1T00 | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Core 5 210H, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -60% | -2% | -7% | -82% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.7 | 5.6 -107% | 2.4 11% | 4.8 -78% | 6.7 -148% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 5.8 | 6.2 -7% | 5.5 5% | 5.9 -2% | 10.1 -74% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7 | 9.1 -30% | 7.8 -11% | 7 -0% | 10.2 -46% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 19.4 | 15.1 22% | 52.6 -171% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 22.2 | 41.1 -85% | 18.8 15% | 23.3 -5% | 36.9 -66% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 26.9 | 48.3 -80% 50.2 -87% | 29.9 -11% | 23.2 14% | 40.2 -49% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 56.6 | 68.3 -21% | 66.95 -18% | 54.9 3% | 69.5 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
带外部监视器时的耗电量
电池寿命
61 Wh 电池的续航时间非常出色。在 150cd/m2下的 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们测得将近 18 小时的续航时间，而在全亮度下仍有 13 小时的续航时间。
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15
- 10/17/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 82.4%  | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB | Amazon: 1. $684.90 SAMSUNG 15” Galaxy AI Book... 2. $629.00 SAMSUNG Galaxy Book4 Edge La... 3. $10.99 KEANBOLL 3-Pack Designed for... List Price: 749€ | 1.5 kg | 15 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
2. 79%  | Acer Aspire Go AG15-51P-56UR Intel Core i5-1334U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $369.00 acer Aspire Go 15 Laptop, 15... List Price: 500€ | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS |
3. 81.9%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: $689.00 List Price: 710 Euro | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS LED |
4. 80.7%  | Asus VivoBook S 15 Snapdragon 8-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,068.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 Laptop; C... 2. $751.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 S5506MA L... 3. $1,399.00 ASUS Vivobook S 15 15.6” 3... List Price: 1149€ | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" 2880x1620 |
5. 73.8%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $546.00 List Price: 770 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
