评语:Surface Pro 12 是一款可靠的日常二合一设备,但价格过于昂贵
新款 Surface Pro 12 是一款可靠的日常伴侣,性能足以满足常见应用的需求,机身质量高,显示屏大小适中,电池续航时间也不错。此外,骁龙 X Plus 的被动散热技术实现得很好,这不禁让人产生疑问:为什么没有更多的被动散热骁龙设备呢?例如,微软自己的 13 英寸 Surface 笔记本电脑就是一个合适的选择。
缺点是缺乏维护选项(内存、固态硬盘),端口缩减(只有 2x USB-C 3.2 Gen.2),以及可选手写笔的新附件。以前,较大的 13 英寸 Surface Pro的键盘盖上有一个储物格,但现在二合一版的背面有一个磁性附件。虽然磁性连接相对较强,但外出时笔并不是特别牢固,甚至无法将可转换设备平放在桌子上。
尺寸稍大的 13 英寸 Surface Pro 在很多方面都更胜一筹(更强的性能、更好的显示屏、更多和更好的端口、可移动固态硬盘),而且价格也与新款 Surface Pro 12 大致相同。不过,它不是被动散热的,这是新型号的一个明显优势。尽管如此,你还是可以看到微软在某些方面削减了成本,总的来说,它的价格(尤其是搭配的配件)与它所提供的功能相比实在是太贵了。
Pros
Cons
通过 Surface Pro 12,微软推出了一款全新的紧凑型二合一电脑,起价 799 美元。我们的评测机配备了骁龙 X1 Plus 处理器、16 GB 内存和 90 Hz IPS 触摸屏。这款小型可折叠设备没有风扇,是首款被动散热的骁龙 X 机型。我们的 512 GB 评测设备售价 899 美元,45 瓦电源适配器另加 70 美元,配套键盘盖和触控笔约 250 美元。这样,总价就高达 1220 美元。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能
Surface Pro 12 的外壳由铝合金制成(有紫色、铂金色或海洋色可选),触感非常高级,具有非常好的制造质量和稳定性。内置的脚架非常稳固,最大开启角度可达 165 度。虽然配置包括 Wi-Fi 7 和适当的快速传输速度,但两个 USB-C 端口仅限于 USB 3.2 Gen.既没有读卡器,也不能更换 UFS 存储。前置的 1080p 网络摄像头(带面部识别功能)拍摄的图像并不特别出色;后置的 1000 万像素摄像头则明显更胜一筹。这是一款 Copilot+ 设备。平板电脑本身重 682 克(厚 7.8 毫米),加上键盘盖后重 1,023 克(厚 13 毫米)。
选配的触控笔不能再存放在键盘盖内。取而代之的是,它现在可以通过磁力吸附在二合一设备的背面。这种连接相当牢固,但也不如以前实用。这意味着在外出时仍有可能丢失触控笔,而且连接了触控笔后,设备自然就不再平放了。
Networking | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

可持续性
微软在其网站上提供了大量可持续发展信息.例如,外壳使用了 82.9% 的可回收材料。这款敞篷车还获得了 "能源之星 "认证,但没有碳足迹方面的信息。
输入设备 - 背光键盘
显示屏 - 90 Hz IPS
|
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 489 cd/m²
Contrast: 2021:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
73% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 NE120DRM-N28, IPS, 2196x1464, 12", 90 Hz | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ LP129WT342166, IPS, 2880x1920, 13", 120 Hz | Apple iPad Air 13 2025 IPS, 2732x2048, 12.9", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 Lenovo N123NCA-GS1, IPS, 1920x1280, 12.3", 60 Hz | Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 OLED, 2800x1840, 12.2", 144 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 21% | 9% | -5% | |||
Display P3 Coverage | 72.7 | 99.5 37% | 83.4 15% | 66.4 -9% | ||
sRGB Coverage | 98.1 | 99.6 2% | 99.7 2% | 98.3 0% | ||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73 | 89.9 23% | 79.4 9% | 68.5 -6% | ||
Response Times | 94% | -16% | -70% | -96% | 93% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.1 ? | 1.54 ? 96% | 39.6 ? -13% | 36.9 -5% | 55.8 ? -59% | 3.09 ? 91% |
Response Time Black / White * | 15.1 ? | 1.41 ? 91% | 18 ? -19% | 35.5 -135% | 35.2 ? -133% | 0.93 ? 94% |
PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 360 | ||||
PWM Amplitude * | 67 | 27.4 | ||||
Screen | 195% | -42% | -46% | -108% | 10% | |
Brightness middle | 485 | 362 -25% | 585 21% | 607 25% | 402.4 -17% | 988 104% |
Brightness | 484 | 364 -25% | 574 19% | 576 19% | 400 -17% | 1003 107% |
Brightness Distribution | 93 | 99 6% | 89 -4% | 87 -6% | 96 3% | 95 2% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.01 96% | 0.56 -133% | 0.5 -108% | 0.29 -21% | |
Contrast | 2021 | 36200 1691% | 1045 -48% | 1214 -40% | 1388 -31% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.9 | 1.5 -67% | 1.3 -44% | 1.52 -69% | 2.99 -232% | 1.2 -33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.7 | 3.1 -82% | 3 -76% | 3.5 -106% | 6.49 -282% | 2.5 -47% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.6 -33% | 2 -67% | 2.2 -83% | 4.38 -265% | 2.1 -75% |
Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.12 104% | 2.18 101% | 2.197 100% | 2.18 101% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 6704 97% | 6514 100% | 6914 94% | 6929 94% | 6987 93% | 6882 94% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.68 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 103% /
139% | -16% /
-26% | -58% /
-51% | -70% /
-82% | 52% /
30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
15.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.5 ms rise | |
↘ 9.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.1 ms rise | |
↘ 19 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8367 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能 - Snapdragon X Plus
Surface Pro 12 只配备最小的 骁龙 X Plus (X1P-42-100)和 16 GB 内存。
测试条件
我们使用 Windows最佳性能能源配置文件进行了基准测试和测量。
处理器
骁龙 X1P-42-100 骁龙 X1P-42-100骁龙 X1P-42-100 提供八个 CPU 内核,主频最高可达 3.4 GHz(无提升)。根据我们的功耗测量,ARM 处理器的 TDP 在短时间内约为 35 瓦,但随后会降至 15 瓦。在多核测试中,性能在短时间内下降了约 40%。但在本机测试中,性能仍可与英特尔当前的 Lunar Lake 芯片媲美,因此完全可以胜任日常任务。在电池模式下,性能保持稳定。
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 |
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Convertible (2949 - 29063, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6062 - 8284, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Convertible (914 - 2163, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1065 - 1134, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (1124 - 11357, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2361 - 3097, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Convertible (348 - 827, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (406 - 425, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average of class Convertible (478 - 4830, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1191 - 1556, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 317, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (206 - 215, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (399 - 683, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average of class Convertible (107 - 1051, n=60, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 121368, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (29238 - 32811, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6540, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4087 - 4675, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Convertible (3.43 - 36.2, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (3.16 - 6.02, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (55.3 - 62.7, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average of class Convertible (42.7 - 84.3, n=60, last 2 years) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (0.728 - 0.777, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average of class Convertible (0.3985 - 0.84, n=60, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Convertible (1480 - 64158, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1480 - 6185, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Convertible (11392 - 183760, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (14234 - 17585, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Convertible (797 - 8151, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2036 - 2614, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Convertible (22413 - 145339, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (44346 - 48581, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Convertible (1120 - 29155, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1240 - 1502, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Convertible (4929 - 97193, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4929 - 9929, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average of class Convertible (21774 - 139734, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (37646 - 45232, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Convertible (218 - 2001, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (473 - 521, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Convertible (1169 - 34297, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2262 - 3399, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Convertible (16583 - 81626, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (31088 - 32139, n=7) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
系统性能
主观来看,系统性能给人留下了积极的印象,在日常情况下运行非常流畅。至于潜在的兼容性问题,值得事先确认一下您想在 ARM 操作系统上运行的应用程序或其本地版本是否可用。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 -6! | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Convertible (524 - 2274, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1061 - 1463, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Convertible (554 - 1925, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1059 - 1284, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Convertible (550 - 2949, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1070 - 1630, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average of class Convertible (381 - 1719, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (989 - 1563, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (129.9 - 426, n=7) | |
Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (130.3 - 284, n=7) | |
Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 317, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (408 - 1145, n=7) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 1089, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Convertible (29473 - 158525, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (61258 - 62525, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (123557 - 127282, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average of class Convertible (28905 - 126725, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Convertible (30591 - 216896, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (45782 - 47845, n=7) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ |
DPC 延迟
我们无法在 Surface Pro 12 上进行标准化的 DPC 延迟测试,因为相应的应用程序无法在 ARM 版本的 Windows 上运行。
存储设备
微软选择了无法扩展的 UFS 存储。性能完全满足日常使用需求,并且保持稳定。在 512 GB 中,用户在初始设置后只能使用 379 GB。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能
虽然集成了 Adreno X1-45 GPU完全可以胜任播放高分辨率视频或流媒体等日常任务,但与同类产品相比,其性能非常低下。因此,Surface Pro 12 并不适合玩游戏(即使不考虑兼容性问题),流媒体是更好的选择。至少,即使在持续负载的情况下,GPU 性能也能保持完全稳定。
3DMark 11 Performance | 4560 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3650 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1069 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 228 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1097 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 1088 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (711 - 1226, n=9) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average of class Convertible (163 - 2067, n=62, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 -3! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Average of class Convertible (8.2 - 75.6, n=42, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM | |
Average of class Convertible (12.3 - 128.8, n=41, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Average of class Convertible (7.14 - 83.5, n=47, last 2 years) | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
Average of class Convertible (6.43 - 117.6, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Average of class Convertible (10.8 - 167.9, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Average of class Convertible (18.8 - 142, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
Average of class Convertible (23 - 138.8, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra preset FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 84.9 | 71.2 | 31.2 | 13 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 81.6 | 66.3 | 56.9 | 49.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 31.4 | 14.9 | ||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 34.9 | |||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 78 | 29 | 22 | 19 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.1 | 11 | 8.7 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 13.6 | 11.1 | 9.17 | 8.52 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
Surface Pro 12 采用被动冷却方式,因此在任何可能的情况下都能做到完全静音。评测设备也没有发出任何其他电子噪音。
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-64-100, Samsung PM9B1 256GB MZ9L4256HCJQ | Apple iPad Air 13 2025 M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 5 134U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDQMQD-512G | Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 Maleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | ||||||
off / environment * | 23.7 | 23.8 | 24 | |||
Idle Minimum * | 23.7 | 23.8 | 24 | |||
Idle Average * | 23.7 | 23.8 | 24 | |||
Idle Maximum * | 23.7 | 23.8 | 24 | |||
Load Average * | 26.7 | 23.8 | 28.02 | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 35.1 | 44.7 | 38.28 | |||
Load Maximum * | 40 | 44.7 | 42.1 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the class Convertible.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.5 °C / 97.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-8.5 °C / -15.3 F).
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Apple iPad Air 13 2025 Apple M3, Apple M3 9-Core GPU | Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 Intel Core Ultra 5 134U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 HiSilicon Kirin 9000W, HiSilicon Maleoon 910 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | 1% | 17% | 2% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.7 | 43.7 2% | 43.9 2% | 32 28% | 40 11% | 38.1 15% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45.1 | 43.9 3% | 44.9 -0% | 37.2 18% | 42 7% | 37.3 17% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 31.9 -23% | 26.2 -1% | 22.7 13% | 27 -4% | 32.4 -25% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.5 | 27.6 -8% | 24.6 4% | 23.4 8% | 27 -6% | 29.6 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器做得还不错,但在音效方面,Apple iPad Air 13 和华为 MatePad Pro 这两款消费类平板电脑要好得多。
Microsoft Surface Pro 12 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+ audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Air 13 2025 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X12 Detachable G2 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.2 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
Surface Pro 12 非常节能,尤其是在空闲时。它不附带电源适配器,微软推荐使用 27 瓦的适配器。我们使用的是官方提供的 45 瓦适配器,在 CPU 满载的情况下,它曾一度成为限制因素。不过,在短时间后,耗电量会迅速降至约 25 瓦,然后稳定在约 20 瓦。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
尽管 Surface Pro 12 的电池容量只有 38 Wh,但它在我们的 Wi-Fi 运行时间测试中取得了非常好的成绩。在亮度为 150 cd/m²(相当于评测设备最大亮度的 62%)的情况下,它可以运行近 15 个小时,在我们的对比领域中名列前茅。这超过了较大的 Surface Pro 13 英寸 IPS高出约 34%。在全亮度状态下,它仍能持续运行约 8.5 小时。在设备打开的情况下,使用 45 瓦的电源适配器充满电需要 124 分钟,约一小时后可恢复 80%的电量。
Notebookcheck 总体评分
Microsoft Surface Pro 12
- 06/20/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.