结论联想 IdeaPad 性价比高，但也有不足之处
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 的售价约为 700 欧元，但却能为买家提供很多东西。最重要的是，它不仅拥有出色的电池续航能力，而且CPU 性能卓越，键盘舒适。这使得这款中型笔记本电脑成为日常工作或学习的绝佳伴侣，即使你不得不因为价格而做出妥协。
除了没有背光键盘和廉价的显示屏外，GPU 性能不佳也是一个负面因素，触摸板也给人廉价的感觉。不过，除了触摸板之外，这些方面对于办公使用来说并不重要，触摸板也并非无法使用。不过，联想笔记本电脑的潜在买家最好使用外接鼠标。
Pros
+ 优点
+ 超长电池寿命
+ 作为一款经济型笔记本电脑，处理器性能卓越
+ Wi-Fi 7、SD 读卡器
+ 舒适的键盘
+ 非常凉爽安静
Cons
- GPU 性能低下
- 无背光键盘
- 触摸板存在缺陷
- 廉价显示屏，色彩还原能力差
- 720p 网络摄像头
$689.00
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Laptop, 8-Core Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, 15.3" WUXGA IPS Touchscreen Display, Qualcomm Adreno Graphics, 16GB LPDDR5 1TB SSD, Backlit KB, FP, Wi-Fi 7, Win11 Home
一千欧元以下的笔记本电脑很诱人--花更少的钱买一台新笔记本电脑是许多人的需求。这正是联想和高通公司希望通过配备高通骁龙 X CPU 的 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 争夺的市场。在测试版本中，这款 15.3 英寸笔记本电脑的售价仅为 700 美元左右。特别是与 联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R的比较最为有趣，因为这几乎是同一款笔记本电脑，只是采用了英特尔内核。
规格高通 Snapdragon X 与 WUXGA 显示屏相结合
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 (IdeaPad Slim 3 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 8 x - 3 GHz, 65 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Oryon
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB
, LPDDR5X-8448
Display
15.30 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 148 PPI, 10-Point-Multitouch, LEN153WUXGA , IPS LED, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Storage
SK hynix PVC10 HFS256GEM4X182N, 256 GB
, M.2 2242, PCIe NVMe 4.0, second empty M.2 2242 slot, 165 GB free
Weight
1.605 kg, Power Supply: 325 g
Price
710 Euro
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
外壳与连接：铝合金和塑料外壳，联想笔记本电脑没有 USB4 接口
联想采用了相对较新的 15.3 英寸格式，这使得该笔记本电脑比同类 16 英寸笔记本电脑更加紧凑。外壳完全是灰色的，与许多其他笔记本电脑不同，它不是锥形的，而是具有连续的厚度。只有屏幕盖是铝制的，底座完全由塑料制成，底板区域粗糙，掌托区域光滑。
IdeaPad 的质量符合该价位的要求，尽管稳定性和材料质量不如更昂贵的笔记本电脑，但在制造质量方面没有大的问题。铰链不允许单手打开，会有一点晃动；最大打开角度约为 170 度。
在连接性方面，联想为 IdeaPad 提供了所有基本标准。虽然不包括 USB4 和 Thunderbolt，但这款笔记本电脑配备了专用的全尺寸 SD 读卡器。
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15 的可升级性出人意料：松开七颗 Torx 螺钉并取下盖子后，内部就有一个空闲的 M.2-2242 插槽。因此，总共可以安装两个固态硬盘，Wi-Fi 卡也是模块化的。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.4 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø750 (624-1211)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1721 (1634-1754)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø959 (628-1257)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1653 (1486-1700)
22 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
输入设备：联想键盘好，触摸板差
联想安装了一个全尺寸键盘，为该价位的产品提供了良好的键入体验。键程约为 1.5 毫米，按键在清晰而柔软的压力点之间实现了完美的结合。有了数字键盘，该键盘还适合输入大量数字。一个弱点：联想节省了键盘的照明，这在按键的触感质量上也很明显，因为它们是由粗糙的塑料制成的。
我们对尺寸为 12 x 7.5 厘米的塑料点击板的评价并不乐观。它的表面不够光滑，触摸板也有些晃动，点击的感觉相当廉价。
另外，IdeaPad 也可以使用触摸屏操作，操作起来没有任何问题。
显示屏触摸屏暗淡无光，色域覆盖率低
联想为 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 提供了三种不同的 16:10 格式屏幕：
- 15.3 英寸，WUXGA（1,920 x 1,200），IPS，300 cd/m²，哑光，45% NTSC
- 15.3 英寸，WUXGA（1,920 x 1,200），IPS，300 cd/m²，雾面，45% NTSC，触摸式
- 15.1 英寸，WQXGA（2,560 x 1,600），OLED，500 cd/m²，亮面，100 % DCI-P3，HDR
内置屏幕显然是一款经济型产品。它有很大的缺陷，尤其是在色彩还原方面。还应指出的是，根据联想的说法，该屏幕是哑光的，但这里的反光比许多其他哑光显示屏更强。因此，这款显示屏不适合在户外使用，亮度不够也是原因之一。
至少，这款联想笔记本电脑不会出现 PWM 闪烁的问题。IPS 显示屏足以满足纯粹的室内办公需求，但不能满足更多需求。除了另一款 IdeaPad 外，对比中的所有竞争对手都拥有更好的显示屏，当然价格也更贵。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEN153WUXGA tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 331 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 315.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 328 cd/m²
Contrast: 1131:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
64.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.42
CCT: 6596 K
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 LEN153WUXGA , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R LEN153WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 15.3", 60 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 Hz | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Samsung ATNA60BX03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | |||||
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.9 | 98.7 | 75.6 | 99.9 | |
| sRGB Coverage | 61.2 | 100 | 98.3 | 100 | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.4 | 88.3 | 74.6 | 98 | |
| Response Times | -12% | -3% | -30% | 98% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28.2 ? | 29.1 ? -3% | 33.2 ? -18% | 36.6 ? -30% | 0.4 ? 99% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 16.8 ? | 20.2 ? -20% | 14.7 ? 12% | 21.9 ? -30% | 0.6 ? 96% |
| PWM Frequency | 120 ? | ||||
| Screen | 15% | 44% | 24% | 4531% | |
| Brightness middle | 328 | 328.3 0% | 525 60% | 387 18% | 407 24% |
| Brightness | 315 | 313 -1% | 513 63% | 401 27% | 405 29% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 87 -4% | 93 2% | 98 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.24 17% | 0.32 -10% | 0.22 24% | 0.001 100% |
| Contrast | 1131 | 1368 21% | 1641 45% | 1759 56% | 407000 35886% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 5.64 12% | 1.7 73% | 4.4 31% | 2.27 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.5 | 19.24 11% | 4 81% | 8.5 60% | 4.46 79% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 2.1 58% | 2.7 46% | 6.4 -28% | 2.3 54% |
| Gamma | 2.42 91% | 2.12 104% | 2.2 100% | 2.29 96% | 2.231 99% |
| CCT | 6596 99% | 6757 96% | 7010 93% | 7896 82% | 6443 101% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.13 | 2.17 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
10% | 21% /
35% | -3% /
13% | 2315% /
3644% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 16.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8291 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能高通处理器处理能力强，图形处理性能差
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 的 CPU 始终是高通 Snapdragon X (X1-26-100)与 Adreno X1-45.焊接的 LPDDR5X-8448 内存容量为 16 至 24 GB，出厂安装的 M.2-2242 SSD 为 256 GB 至 1 TB。
测试条件
我们的基准测试是在性能模式下进行的，根据功耗测量结果，处理器的 TDP 在 50 至 65 瓦之间。
处理器
高通 高通骁龙 X X1-26-100联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15 配备了八核 Oryon ARM 处理器，主频最高达 2.98 GHz，性能令人信服。在原生 Cinebench 2024 测试中，骁龙 X 处理器没有出现节流现象，性能轻松超越了 Raptor Lake 和 AMD Zen4 六核等经济型 x86 竞争产品，但这只是在所有内核负载的情况下，在单核负载的情况下，两者不分伯仲。
电池模式下的性能下降并不明显。
| Cinebench 2024 Performance Rating | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (62.3 - 123.5, n=38, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (96 - 96, n=3) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (646 - 708, n=3) | |
| Average of class Office (152.1 - 994, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100: Ø1411 (1363.23-1420.5)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H: Ø1084 (990.54-1483.18)
Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100: Ø1373 (1323.89-1404)
Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U: Ø1650 (1640.55-1663.48)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance Rating | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 -12! | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA -2! | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (6897 - 7539, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (708 - 2130, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (965 - 978, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2644 - 2842, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (285 - 815, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (359 - 366, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (1338 - 1421, n=3) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (99.5 - 312, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (181.2 - 186, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (440 - 477, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (29312 - 29907, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (3046 - 6497, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (4041 - 4102, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (10492 - 14998, n=4) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (757 - 14998, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (462 - 2894, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2070 - 2675, n=4) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (1532 - 14192, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (n=1) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (510 - 2096, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (n=1) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (4.44 - 5.52, n=3) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (67.6 - 102.3, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average of class Office (41.5 - 129.6, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (0.861 - 0.888, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.06, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (1685 - 31245, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (5435 - 5647, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (8977 - 125394, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (14133 - 16182, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 5398, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2093 - 2368, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (20636 - 115197, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (44150 - 44593, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (1064 - 18321, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (1370 - 1384, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (4415 - 66922, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (9024 - 9154, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (35860 - 40691, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (138.6 - 1366, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (447 - 484, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (859 - 17834, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2766 - 3102, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (9310 - 55359, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (30286 - 31591, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
系统性能
系统性能与 x86 竞争对手相当，只有Apple MacBook Air 15 的性能明显更好。
Performance Rating: Percent
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -4! | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV -4! | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1093 - 1114, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1880, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1001 - 1022, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average of class Office (319 - 2155, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1203 - 1246, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 1877, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1007 - 1081, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (353 - 375, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (104.2 - 249, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Office (391 - 1966, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (478 - 521, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (61578 - 63432, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (19648 - 108783, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (116332 - 125251, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (10084 - 127282, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Average of class Office (20073 - 117935, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (46150 - 48754, n=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (7.6 - 162.9, n=83, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (7.2 - 17.2, n=2) | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
SK Hynix PVC10 M.2 2242 NVMe PCIe 4.0 M.2-2280 SSD 的容量为 256 GB。由于没有散热片，在连续负载情况下性能也会明显下降。幸运的是，在日常使用中很少会出现这种情况。
SK hynix PVC10 HFS256GEM4X182N
Sequential Read:
3681MB/s
Sequential Write:
1427MB/s
4K Read:
47.2MB/s
4K Write:
110.8MB/s
4K-64 Read:
1213MB/s
4K-64 Write:
252MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.162ms
Access Time Write:
0.045ms
Copy ISO:
2218.24MB/s
Copy Program:
775.59MB/s
Copy Game:
1721.04MB/s
Score Read:
1628Points
Score Write:
506Points
Score Total:
2859Points
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3930 (2717.09-5990.07)
图形处理器性能
GPU 性能并不是当前高通平台的优势之一。目前的游戏根本无法运行，因为性能太低了。只能玩要求不高的老游戏。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4573 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3628 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1066 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 -4! | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA -2! | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (6.65 - 29.6, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 | |
| Average of class Office (6.83 - 31.6, n=41, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (6.45 - 36.5, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Average of class Office (6.19 - 97.5, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Office (10.9 - 92.6, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS: Ø7.25 (0.769-20)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 88.5 | 85 | 33.9 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 78.5 | 61.8 | 55.9 | 48.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.1 | 18.1 | 18.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36.7 | 28.2 | 25.3 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 11.7 | 9.38 | 7.78 | 6.83 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 15.3 | 11.5 | 9.91 | 8.45 |
排放与能源：ARM IdeaPad 保持凉爽和安静
噪音排放
在空闲模式下，风扇始终处于关闭状态。在压力测试中，噪音水平最高达到 42.7 dB(a)--可以听到，但并不恼人。
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 笔记本电脑不存在线圈啸叫问题。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 24 dB(A) |
| Load |
| / 42.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, SK hynix PVC10 HFS256GEM4X182N | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, Core 5 210H, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 10-Core GPU, M4 (10 cores), Apple SSD AP1024Z | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV Radeon 760M, R5 8640U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -11% | -2% | -22% | ||
| off / environment * | 24 | 27.3 -14% | 23.2 3% | 25 -4% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 27.3 -14% | 23.2 3% | 26 -8% | |
| Idle Average * | 24 | 27.3 -14% | 23.2 3% | 29 -21% | |
| Idle Maximum * | 24 | 29 -21% | 23.2 3% | 39 -63% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 33.3 | 35.1 -5% | 38.4 -15% | 43 -29% | |
| Load Maximum * | 42.7 | 41.5 3% | 47.6 -11% | 45 -5% | |
| Load Average * | 42 | 28.3 | 45 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在压力测试中，联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 的温度几乎没有超过温升--在这方面，它是一款绝对没有问题的笔记本电脑。因此，压力测试中的 CPU 温度也保持在绿色范围内。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.1 °C / 75.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.1 °C / 75.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.5 °C / 6.3 F).
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H, Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 Apple M4 (10 cores), Apple M4 10-core GPU | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U, AMD Radeon 760M | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 1% | 5% | -22% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.2 | 34.2 10% | 44.9 -18% | 39.1 -2% | 48 -26% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 39.2 | 38.8 1% | 43.9 -12% | 37.1 5% | 60 -53% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 27.7 | 28.6 -3% | 23.4 16% | 25.7 7% | 28 -1% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.6 | 31.4 -10% | 23.5 18% | 25.4 11% | 31 -8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想在键盘上方安装了非常普通的扬声器，向用户发出声音。它们缺乏音量，尤其是低音。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 Qualcomm 在闲置模式下相当节能，最低耗电量为 2.4 瓦。在压力测试中，我们测得的最大功耗为 66.95 瓦，略高于电源输出的 65 瓦。不过，由于能耗下降很快，电池在主电源运行时不会自行放电。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
| Idle | 2.4 / 5.5 / 7.8 Watt |
| Load |
/ 66.95 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø57.6 (49.1-67)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.72 (4.78-6.87)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø29.9 (26.5-37.8)
带外部监视器时的耗电量
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø56.3 (44.6-67.1)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø45 (41.9-49.2)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø11.9 (9.17-20.1)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.7 (8.79-11.1)
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø18.8 (17.6-21.9)
电池寿命
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15 的电池续航时间非常出色，这也是最新的高通骁龙处理器所具备的性能。在 Wi-Fi 网页浏览测试中（亮度为 150 cd/m²），联想笔记本电脑的续航时间约为 19 小时。
| Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 60 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Core 5 210H, UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 60 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 M4 (10 cores), M4 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 70 Wh | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV R5 8640U, Radeon 760M, 54 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -11% | -13% | 2% | -75% | -20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1141 | 1019 -11% | 988 -13% | 1164 2% | 290 -75% | 701 ? -39% |
| Load | 114 | 113.2 ? -1% |
笔记本检查评级
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 为学生或家庭办公提供了一款经济实惠的好帮手。它的优势在于键盘质量、CPU 性能、电池续航时间和低发热量。另一方面，GPU 性能和显示屏质量打了折扣，而且没有背光键盘。
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10
- 08/20/2025 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Office - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 81.9%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15Q8X10 Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 256 GB SSD | Amazon: $689.00 List Price: 710 Euro | 1.6 kg | 18.5 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS LED |
2. 73.8%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $545.99 List Price: 770 USD | 1.7 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.30" 1920x1200 148 PPI IPS |
3. 91.2%  | Apple MacBook Air 15 M4 Apple M4 (10 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 10-core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,399.00 Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in... 2. $1,749.00 Apple 2025 MacBook Air 15-in... 3. $999.00 Apple 2025 MacBook Air 13-in... List Price: 1999€ | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.30" 2880x1864 224 PPI IPS |
4. 84%  | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,299.00 ASUS Vivobook S16 AI Laptop ... 2. $1,019.99 ASUS Vivobook S16 Laptop, Co... 3. $34.99 Laptop Case Cover for ASUS V... List Price: 899€ | 1.8 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
5. 81.3%  | Acer Swift Edge 16 SFE16-44-R0XV AMD Ryzen 5 8640U ⎘ AMD Radeon 760M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1000 EUR | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
