结论 - 优化用于会议和基本办公任务
高通骁龙是否适合您取决于您的需求。EliteBook 6 G1q 14 针对 Co-Pilot+、5G WAN 和 HP Go 连接、AI 增强网络摄像头功能进行了优化,在运行 ARM 本机应用程序时,CPU 性能与价格相当。不过,对于更专业或 GPU 重度应用,兼容性无法保证,而且通过仿真,性能可能会比预期的慢。
在其他方面,CPU 周围的硬件也非常出色,尤其是对于基本型号的 EliteBook 而言。特别是电池寿命和风扇噪音,通常分别比英特尔或 AMD 的大多数解决方案更长和更安静。我们建议您谨慎选择显示屏选项,因为有无 Sure View 或选择 2560 x 1600 而非 1920 x 1200 的配置之间存在显著差异。
Pros
Cons
EliteBook 6 系列直接取代了较早的 EliteBook 600 系列,成为企业和办公室的首选经济型产品系列。该系列有英特尔、AMD 和高通三种型号,分别称为 G1i、G1a 和 G1q。
我们的 EliteBook 6 G1q 14 测试机是中间的高通配置,配备骁龙 X Plus X1P-42-100 CPU、1200p IPS 显示屏和 32 GB 焊接内存,售价约为 1345 美元。其他SKU配置为速度较慢的骁龙X X1-26-100或速度较快的骁龙X Elite X1E-78-100,显示屏分辨率最高可达1600p。
EliteBook 6 的竞争对手包括其他商务笔记本,如 联想 ThinkPad E14 7 代戴尔 Pro 14 Plus 或 华硕 ExpertBook B5.
更多惠普评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
尽管 EliteBook 6 本质上是 EliteBook 系列中最便宜的机型之一,但其机箱设计和质量依然强劲。键盘面板、底盖和外盖均由铝而不是塑料制成,因此系统给人的感觉仍然是一台真正的 EliteBook,而不是廉价的Pavilion 。铰链的绷紧程度也相当高,可以达到 180 度。
连接性
这款入门级 EliteBook 的集成端口数量令人印象深刻。HDMI、RJ-45 和多个 USB-A 端口一应俱全,而价格昂贵得多的 EliteBook Ultra G1q则缺少了许多这些主要端口。
请注意,EliteBook 6 的高通型号没有任何智能卡选项。
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
网络摄像头
我们的测试机配备了 200 万像素网络摄像头和物理快门,但高端配置还可同时配备红外摄像头和分辨率更高的 500 万像素网络摄像头。

可持续性
机箱由 50% 的可回收金属和 20% 至 50% 的可回收塑料或海洋塑料组成。包装主要采用纸张和纸板,交流适配器采用塑料包装。
配件和保修
包装盒内无任何额外物品。如果在美国购买,制造商通常提供一年有限保修。
输入设备
显示屏
有以下五种显示选项。我们的特定测试装置配置了黑体选项。
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,300 尼特,60 赫兹,非触摸式
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,300 尼特,60 赫兹,触摸式
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,400 尼特,60 赫兹,非触摸式
- 1920 x 1200,IPS,800 尼特,60 赫兹,Sure View,非触摸式
- 2560 x 1600、IPS、400 尼特、120 赫兹、100% DCI-P3、非触摸式
该选项提供完整的 sRGB 色彩,但黑白响应时间相对较慢,没有出厂色彩校准,刷新率仅为 60 Hz。触摸屏选项仅限于较低端的 300 尼特面板,而超亮面板则仅限于 Sure View。不过,对于基本的浏览、流媒体和业余图像编辑,我们的 400 尼特 sRGB 色彩面板已经足够。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 434.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 3342:1 (Black: 0.13 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 3.31 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
Gamma: 1.96
CCT: 6049 K
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 LG Philips LGD079D, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 90 Hz | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET LGD079D, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | HP ProBook 445 G10 AUO2FA6, IPS, 1920x1080, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 G7-21SYS00H00 TL140ADXP22, IPS, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W LP140WU4, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA BOE NV140WUM-N43, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | ||||||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 67.1 | 68.4 | 72.2 | 37.5 | 39.7 | |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 96 | 95.2 | 100 | 56.3 | 59.1 | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 69.2 | 70.6 | 73.7 | 38.8 | 41.1 | |
| Response Times | 31% | 14% | 44% | 41% | 54% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 50.2 ? | 31.4 ? 37% | 53.4 ? -6% | 32.7 ? 35% | 27.1 ? 46% | 23.65 ? 53% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 32.6 ? | 24.5 ? 25% | 21.8 ? 33% | 15.7 ? 52% | 21.1 ? 35% | 14.83 ? 55% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | ||||||
| Screen | -17% | -12% | -6% | -58% | -74% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 434.4 | 444 2% | 501 15% | 389 -10% | 315 -27% | 290 -33% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 423 | 434 3% | 464 10% | 363 -14% | 295 -30% | 281 -34% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 94 | 94 0% | 87 -7% | 89 -5% | 87 -7% | 79 -16% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.13 | 0.19 -46% | 0.26 -100% | 0.24 -85% | 0.25 -92% | 0.22 -69% |
| Contrast (:1) | 3342 | 2337 -30% | 1927 -42% | 1621 -51% | 1260 -62% | 1318 -61% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.31 | 3.4 -3% | 2.64 20% | 1.7 49% | 6 -81% | 6.61 -100% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.44 | 7 -29% | 5.06 7% | 3.5 36% | 15.2 -179% | 20.32 -274% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 5.2 -30% | 3.8 5% | 2.8 30% | 3.3 17% | 4.1 -2% |
| Gamma | 1.96 112% | 2.04 108% | 2.103 105% | 2.17 101% | 2.02 109% | 1.81 122% |
| CCT | 6049 107% | 6295 103% | 6562 99% | 6572 99% | 6140 106% | 7048 92% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.7 | 1.57 | 1.2 | 5.1 | 4.25 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
-7% | 1% /
-7% | 19% /
4% | -9% /
-38% | -10% /
-48% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.9 ms rise | |
| ↘ 17.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 88 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 50.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.2 ms rise | |
| ↘ 28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8023 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
直接将 CPU 性能与典型的 x86 笔记本电脑进行比较可能比较困难。如果应用程序原生运行于 Windows ARM,那么我们的 骁龙 X Plus X1P-42-100 甚至可以超越 Lunar Lake 酷睿至尊 7 258V在原始多线程工作负载上也能超过 30%。但是,如果应用程序必须进行模拟,那么我们的骁龙 CPU 的性能最多会降低 25%,与较老的 U 系列 CPU(如 Ryzen 5 7530U.
升级到 骁龙 X Elite X1E-78-100预计性能将提高 10% 至 15%,而降级到 骁龙 X X1-26-100预计性能将下降 15%。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
| CPU Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET -2! | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W -2! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 21QG001VGE -2! | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon -2! | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA -2! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 -3! | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 -2! | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 -2! | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 -2! | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA -2! | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 21QG001VGE | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4457 - 8618, n=3) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 21QG001VGE | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1486 - 1669, n=3) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (554 - 763, n=11) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| HP OmniBook X Flip 16 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (107 - 109, n=10) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| HP Omnibook 5 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1480 - 6208, n=9) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (14234 - 17629, n=9) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2036 - 2642, n=9) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (44346 - 48641, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (1240 - 1502, n=9) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (4929 - 9953, n=9) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (37646 - 45232, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (473 - 524, n=9) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (2262 - 3430, n=9) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (31088 - 32478, n=9) | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.5 | Half Precision GPU 1.5 | Single Precision GPU 1.5
| Performance rating | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W -3! | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET -3! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE -3! | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA -3! | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1061 - 1463, n=10) | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1059 - 1284, n=10) | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1070 - 1660, n=10) | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (989 - 1563, n=10) | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (129.9 - 426, n=10) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (130.3 - 289, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (396 - 1145, n=10) | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.5 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (40257 - 40994, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.5 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (16463 - 16672, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.5 | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1539 - 1707, n=3) | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (61258 - 63933, n=9) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (112408 - 128030, n=9) | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (45782 - 49288, n=9) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 (6.8 - 8.7, n=5) | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的 三星 PM9A1比 EliteBook 8 14 中的 PM9C1 更快,但如下图所示,在 DiskSpd 循环测试中,几分钟后就会出现节流。没有空间安装二级固态硬盘。
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
图形性能是该系统的弱项之一。集成的 Adreno X1甚至比中档的 Arc 130V或 Radeon 860M系列的性能,尤其是因为许多 GPU 密集型应用程序必须在系统上模拟运行。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4591 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17447 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3667 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1067 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W -2! | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET -1! | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 -2! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 112 | 103.6 | 34.2 | 15.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 85.6 | 67.3 | 57.6 | 49.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.5 | 18 | 9.88 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 40.9 | 30.5 | 27.3 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 87.4 | 29.9 | 22.7 | 19.6 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.3 | 11.7 | 10.2 | 10.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 15.2 | 11.6 | 9.81 | 8.41 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 22.8 / 22.8 / 22.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 22.8 / 41.8 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET R7 250, Radeon 780M | HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE Core Ultra 5 228V, Arc 130V | Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -19% | -13% | -17% | -14% | -38% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 22.7 | 23.7 -4% | 24 -6% | 24.5 -8% | 24.9 -10% | 23 -1% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 22.8 | 23.7 -4% | 24 -5% | 24.5 -7% | 24.9 -9% | 27.38 -20% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 22.8 | 23.7 -4% | 25 -10% | 24.5 -7% | 24.9 -9% | 27.38 -20% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 22.8 | 23.7 -4% | 28 -23% | 25.4 -11% | 27.6 -21% | 27.38 -20% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 22.8 | 39.1 -71% | 33 -45% | 38.6 -69% | 29.3 -29% | 45.35 -99% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 29.4 | 42.4 -44% | 34.9 -19% | 37.5 -28% | 52.3 -78% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 41.8 | 42.3 -1% | 36 14% | 41.5 1% | 37.5 10% | 52.21 -25% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 36 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱左半部分靠近处理器的表面温度明显较高。热点温度可达 40 摄氏度左右,仅比我们在搭载英特尔处理器的 ThinkPad E14 7 代.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.5 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.4 °C / 79.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.5 °C / 81.5 F (+1.1 °C / 2 F).
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET R7 250, Radeon 780M | HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE Core Ultra 5 228V, Arc 130V | Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -10% | -19% | -5% | -10% | -20% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 37.2 | 41.3 -11% | 43 -16% | 41.7 -12% | 38.1 -2% | 38.6 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 42.4 | 40.5 4% | 51 -20% | 43.3 -2% | 40.1 5% | 48 -13% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 24.2 | 27.4 -13% | 27 -12% | 24.3 -0% | 28.9 -19% | 28.8 -19% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 23.6 | 28.6 -21% | 30 -27% | 25 -6% | 29.6 -25% | 33.4 -42% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
| 平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 23 |
| Prime95 压力 | 2.7 | -- | 76 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.2 - 2.7 | 1107 | 65 - 82 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 3.2 | 1107 | 48 |
HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
搭载骁龙处理器的 EliteBook 预计会非常高效,尤其是在运行浏览器或视频等常见日常工作负载时。它可能比酷睿 Ultra 7 258V 系统(如 ThinkPad T14 G6的要求更高,但它同时提供了更快的性能,每瓦性能水平相当。
我们使用小巧(约 8.9 x 5 x 2.8 厘米)的 65 W USB-C AC 适配器记录的最大功耗为 69 W。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET R7 250, Radeon 780M, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL81T0HELB-00BTW, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE Core Ultra 5 228V, Arc 130V, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -44% | -58% | -63% | -53% | -59% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.4 | 3.2 6% | 7 -106% | 3.9 -15% | 3.7 -9% | 2.57 24% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.5 | 5.2 -16% | 8 -78% | 7.2 -60% | 7.3 -62% | 5.95 -32% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 5.9 | 6.1 -3% | 9 -53% | 8.6 -46% | 8.5 -44% | 6.85 -16% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 18.4 | 41.8 -127% | 34 -85% | 39.9 -117% | 37.4 -103% | 45.6 -148% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 22.1 | 42.1 -90% | 44.8 -103% | 35.9 -62% | 48.6 -120% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 20.1 | 41.6 -107% | 42.1 -109% | 40.3 -100% | 48 -139% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 69.2 | 50.5 27% | 47 32% | 61 12% | 64.6 7% | 55.7 20% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 36.2 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
56 瓦时电池的实际浏览时间长达近 16 小时。此外,还提供配备更小、更轻的 48 Wh 电池的配置。
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, 56 Wh | HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET R7 250, Radeon 780M, 62 Wh | HP ProBook 445 G10 R5 7530U, Vega 7, 42 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE Core Ultra 5 228V, Arc 130V, 64 Wh | Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350, Radeon 860M, 55 Wh | Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 63 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -11% | -40% | -8% | -26% | -18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 15.9 | 14.2 -11% | 9.5 -40% | 14.6 -8% | 11.8 -26% | 13.1 -18% |
| Load (h) | 1.8 | 1.8 | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 12.7 |
笔记本检查评级
超长的电池续航时间、安静的运行环境和丰富的连接功能,使 HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 成为一款极具吸引力的商用笔记本电脑(如果主要运行 ARM 原生应用程序)。
HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14
- 01/02/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HP EliteBook 6 G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1300 USD | 1.5 kg | 17 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
| HP EliteBook 8 G1a 14 AD3E9ET AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1695 Euro | 1.4 kg | 19.1 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED | |
| HP ProBook 445 G10 AMD Ryzen 5 7530U ⎘ AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. HP Latest ProBook 445 G9 Bus... 2. HP ProBook 450 G10 Business ... 3. 65W Laptop Charger Fit for H... List Price: 830 EUR | 1.3 kg | 20 mm | 14.00" 1920x1080 157 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 21U2002QGE Intel Core Ultra 5 228V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 i ... 2. Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen 7 La... 3. Lenovo 14" ThinkPad E14 Gen ... List Price: 1199€ | 1.4 kg | 15.3 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI IPS | |
| Dell Pro 14 Plus PB14255 GH77W AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1630 Euro | 1.6 kg | 22 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED | |
| Asus ExpertBook B5 B5404CMA Intel Core Ultra 7 155U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Meteor / Arrow Lake) ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1340 USD | 1.3 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.



























































