华硕Vivobook 15 K513EQ OLED笔记本电脑回顾。联想IdeaPad的替代品

从高端的华硕ZenBook系列往下走一步,你会发现自己跪在面向预算的华硕VivoBook系列中。这个家族一直在迅速扩大,成为一个令人困惑的庞大机型阵容,包括英特尔和AMD的CPU,集成或独立显卡,甚至OLED选项。这肯定很难跟上,而最新的VivoBook 15 K513并没有完全让事情变得简单。
撇开命名惯例不谈,我们的VivoBook 15 K513测试装置肯定不同于大多数其他预算或中档多媒体笔记本电脑,它具有不常见的英特尔第11代酷睿i7-1165G7和GeForce MX350配对。此外,它是首批配备非触摸式1080p OLED显示屏的15.6英寸笔记本电脑之一,而目前所有的4K OLED面板都是如此。我们将仔细研究VivoBook 15 K513的性能、显示屏和物理特性,以了解究竟是什么让它与市场上所有其他VivoBook 15机型如此不同。
这一领域的竞争者包括其他中档多媒体笔记本电脑,如 联想IdeaPad 5 15, 戴尔 Inspiron 15, 惠普Pavilion 15, 或 MSI Summit B15/E15系列。我们的具体测试装置可以在网上找到,价格约为900美元至1000美元。
更多华硕VivoBook评论。
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.2 % | 11/2021 | Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.6 % | 11/2021 | Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.4 % | 12/2020 | Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T i7-1165G7, GeForce MX350 | 1.8 kg | 16.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.5 % | 08/2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.7 kg | 19.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.5 % | 10/2021 | Dell Inspiron 15 3501 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 2 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % | 07/2021 | HP Pavilion 15-eg i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450 | 1.7 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 希望你喜欢塑料
所有各种15.6英寸的VivoBook 15型号之间的内部和外部都有适度的差异。在我们的案例中,VivoBook 15 K513最类似于 VivoBook 15 F512在端口定位和主板布局方面最为相似。特别是塑料底座,远没有典型的塑料底座牢固或豪华。 禅书15,惠普Spectre,或 戴尔XPS 15这也是可以预期的。底盘硬度反而更符合联想IdeaPad 5 15或戴尔Inspiron 3501,而比最新的惠普Pavilion 15要弱一些。例如,它的键盘中心,比我们希望的更容易弯曲。
连接性 - 没有Thunderbolt或USB-C充电功能
端口选项是体面的,但有令人失望的注意事项。首先,USB-C端口不支持DisplayPort或Power Delivery,这意味着你无法通过这个端口连接外部显示器或为系统充电,这与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同。其次,HDMI端口只有1.4版本,意味着它不支持60FPS的4K外部显示器。该模型甚至利用了比USB-A 3.0更慢的USB-A 2.0端口。
SD卡阅读器
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Pavilion 15-eg (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 (AV Pro V60) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3501 (AV Pro SD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP Pavilion 15-eg (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 (AV Pro V60) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ (AV Pro V60) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3501 (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) |
沟通
网络摄像头
相机质量仍然很差,而且多年来基本没有变化。也不支持Windows Hello,因为没有集成红外传感器,甚至没有物理隐私快门。

维护 - 易于打开
配件和保修
除了文件和交流电适配器外,零售盒中没有其他额外的东西。标准的一年有限制造商保修适用。
输入设备--海绵状点击板
键盘
如果你以前在VivoBook笔记本电脑上打过字,那么你会清楚地知道对VivoBook 15 K513的期望,因为在键盘反馈方面,各型号之间的差异非常小。与以商务为中心的笔记本电脑的较硬的按键相比,行程和触感都分别保持较浅和较软。 联想ThinkPad或惠普EliteBook更硬。键盘的按键 联想IdeaPad 5 15感觉与我们这里的华硕相似,但华硕的按键声音适度偏大。
触摸板
显示屏 - 大多数情况下比IPS好
华硕在其VivoBook 15 K513和VivoBook 15 Pro系列中使用了相同的1080p三星ATNA56YX03-0 OLED面板。该面板因提供完整的DCI-P3覆盖率而引人注目,这是大多数IPS面板无法达到的,特别是在这个<1000美元的价格范围内。超快的响应时间、相对明亮的背光和极端的对比度使我们的VivoBook在图形编辑方面比预期的要好。
请记住,脉宽调制存在于所有的亮度水平,与大多数其他笔记本电脑不同。当亮度设置为50%或更高时,我们能够记录到59赫兹的频率,当亮度设置为49%或更低时,能够记录到434赫兹。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 384.5 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.53 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
99.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ Samsung ATNA56YX03-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 ATNA56YX03-0, AMOLED, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T Panda LM156LF-5L04, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 Lenovo LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Dell Inspiron 15 3501 BOE NV15N3D (Dell P/N: N39X1), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | HP Pavilion 15-eg Chi Mei CMN1523, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -54% | -52% | -54% | -50% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 39.01 -61% | 39.4 -61% | 42.9 -57% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.9 0% | 58.5 -41% | 59 -41% | 58.7 -41% | 64 -36% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.9 | 95.8 -4% | 40.33 -60% | 38 -62% | 40.7 -59% | 44.4 -56% |
Response Times | -18% | -1229% | -870% | -426% | 14162% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.2 ? | 3.2 ? -45% | 38 ? -1627% | 29 ? -1218% | 43 ? -1855% | 22.8 ? -936% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.9 ? | 3.2 ? -10% | 27 ? -831% | 18 ? -521% | 32 ? -1003% | 23.6 ? -714% |
PWM Frequency | 59.5 ? | 60.2 ? 1% | 1000 ? 1581% | 26320 ? 44135% | ||
Screen | 14% | -65% | -101% | -47% | -74% | |
Brightness middle | 384.5 | 396 3% | 287 -25% | 376 -2% | 271 -30% | 294.3 -23% |
Brightness | 388 | 397 2% | 261 -33% | 341 -12% | 263 -32% | 251 -35% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 99 1% | 84 -14% | 78 -20% | 92 -6% | 76 -22% |
Black Level * | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.15 | 0.26 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.53 | 2 21% | 4.72 -87% | 6.4 -153% | 4.83 -91% | 4.08 -61% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.16 | 4.8 22% | 17.94 -191% | 20.45 -232% | 7 -14% | 19.49 -216% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1 37% | 2.2 -38% | 4.59 -187% | 3.36 -110% | 3 -88% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.17 101% | 2.51 88% | 2.26 97% | 2.56 86% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6464 101% | 6608 98% | 6758 96% | 6819 95% | 6764 96% | 6616 98% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.8 | 3.74 | 3.7 | |||
Contrast | 563 | 570 | 1807 | 1132 | ||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 38 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 59 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
2% | -449% /
-273% | -341% /
-245% | -176% /
-143% | 4679% /
3491% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise | |
↘ 1.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.1 ms rise | |
↘ 1.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 59.5 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 59.5 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 59.5 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21792 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 第11代Tiger Lake-U
目前的SKU配备了U系列的 酷睿i3-1115G4CPU,直至酷睿i7-1165G7,外加Optimus 1.0上可选的GeForce MX330或MX350图形。前面提到的酷睿i3 SKU只配备了集成的UHD Graphics ,要明显慢于Iris Xe或独立的Nvidia GPU。用户将不得不看一下更高端的 VivoBook 15 Pro系列,如果他们想要更快的Core H系列CPU和GeForce RTX图形。
处理器
CPU性能非常好,多线程结果比我们数据库中相同的笔记本电脑平均快10%左右。 酷睿i7-1165G7处理器。选择较小的 酷睿i5-1135G7选项将导致性能下降约10%至15%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC -10! | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K -2! | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ -2! | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 -10! | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 -10! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE -2! | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES -2! | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 -2! |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1060 - 2657, n=79) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (442 - 589, n=79) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (553 - 1027, n=84) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (115 - 230, n=76) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (468 - 1138, n=78) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (15347 - 27405, n=78) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (4478 - 5507, n=78) | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (3078 - 5926, n=75) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 |
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1302 - 1595, n=75) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (1.39 - 8.47, n=78) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (21.5 - 88.1, n=76) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5502 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P15s Gen1-20T4000JGE | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (0.552 - 1.002, n=78) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
HP Pavilion 15-eg | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3501 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
HP Pavilion 15-eg | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7 (12392 - 45694, n=56) | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3501 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 |
系统性能
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
HP Pavilion 15-eg | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3501 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1165G7, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (4373 - 5330, n=4) | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
PCMark 10 Score | 5120 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
HP Pavilion 15-eg | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3501 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个驱动器的空间
我们的设备配置了一个512GB 英特尔660p SSDPEKNW512G8PCIe3 NVMe固态硬盘的理论最大读写速率分别只有1500MB/s和1000MB/s,这比更昂贵的三星PM981a系列慢了大约2倍。对于目标受众来说,性能可能是足够的,特别是考虑到该硬盘所搭配的ULV U系列CPU和GeForce MX图形。由于英特尔660p只是一个预算到中档的NVMe解决方案,所以在压力下,散热器对保持性能并不那么必要。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 3501 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
Asus VivoBook S15 S533EQ-BQ002T | |
HP Pavilion 15-eg | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - Iris Xe与GeForce MX350相比
图形性能是我们所期望的,相对于其他配备相同的笔记本电脑而言。 GeForce MX350GPU。英特尔的竞争性集成 Iris Xe平台随着时间的推移,在驱动程序和游戏支持方面一直在稳步提高,现在在大多数情况下与Nvidia GPU并驾齐驱。GTA V和DOTA 2 Reborn是两个明显的例外,我们的GeForce-powered Vivobook与Iris Xe相比仍然拥有明显的性能优势。
从 MX330 升级到MX350将使性能提高约15%至20%。
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus VivoBook 15 Pro M3500QC-L1062 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
HP Pavilion 15-eg | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
MSI Summit B15 A11M | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 4 15 AMD TFF_00028 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (5191 - 6448, n=12) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 15ALC05 | |
HP Envy 17t-cg000 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
HP 250 G7-15S40ES |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6585 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 17163 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4088 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1497 points | |
Help |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
1280x720 Lite Quality | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (36.5 - 48.6, n=4) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (20.4 - 23.2, n=4) | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
1920x1080 High Quality | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K | |
Asus Vivobook 15 K513EQ | |
HP Pavilion x360 15-er0155ng | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX350 (10.7 - 14.9, n=4) | |
HP Pavilion Aero 13 be0097nr | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 G3-20YG003UGE |
The Witcher 3 | |
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
VAIO SX14 VJS144X0111K |