结论：配备骁龙 X2 Elite 的 Zenbook A14 令人印象深刻，尤其是 1149 美元的售价
更新后的华硕 Zenbook A14 再次成为一款非常便携的 14 英寸笔记本电脑，电池续航时间长，但新加入的骁龙 X2 Elite 处理器将整体性能提升到了一个全新的水平。即使使用几乎听不到声音的Whisper 型号，它的 CPU 性能也超过了英特尔或 AMD 芯片的任何其他直接竞争对手。GPU 性能也非常出色，效率极高。1200p OLED 仍被限制在 60 Hz，但仍能提供非常好的图像质量。
如果使用最高性能，风扇的声音会非常大，但日常使用场景并不需要这样，整体性能给人的印象非常好，即使在电池供电的情况下也是如此。由于 Windows on ARM 的缘故，可能还会有一些限制，我们建议你在购买骁龙笔记本电脑之前先检查一下应用程序的支持情况，但与最初发布的骁龙 X 相比，整体体验要精良得多。
1149 美元的基本机型配备了功能强大的 X2 Elite 和 24GB 内存，性价比非常高，你很难找到与之相媲美的设备。Apple's MacBook Air 13 M5将是主要竞争对手，起价 1099 美元，配备较慢的 GPU 和 16 GB 内存。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
新款 Zenbook A14 起价 1149 美元，将在百思买发售。
华硕更新了其极为轻巧的 14 英寸子笔记本 Zenbook A14，它是首款采用高通最新骁龙 X2 Elite 芯片的设备，因此与之前采用旧骁龙 X Plus 的机型相比，性能得到了大幅提升。机身重量不到 1 千克，结构没有变化，其中还包括 60 Hz OLED 屏幕。基本型号的起价为 1149 美元，配备 X2 Elite SoC、24 GB 内存和 512 GB SSD 存储空间，而我们的评测机是配备 32 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD 存储空间的 SKU，售价为 1799 美元。 我们的骁龙 X2 Extreme 分析.
规格
外壳和连接
底盘结构 没有改变新款 Zenbook A14 再次保持在 1 公斤以下。稳定性仍然很好，但我们的评测机的铰链发出了一些轻微的吱吱声。铰链也有点太松了。维护选项仍然仅限于单个 M.2-2280 SSD。
连接性保持不变，有两个 USB-C 4.0 端口、HDMI 以及一个普通的 USB-A 端口。Wi-Fi 7 模块支持蓝牙 6.0，与 Wi-Fi 7 路由器结合可实现出色的传输速率。1080p 网络摄像头可拍摄出令人满意的图像，并支持微软的所有 Copilot+ 功能。
| Networking | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
输入设备
输入设备也没有改变，这意味着 1.3 毫米行程的背光键盘可以提供舒适的键入体验，尽管由于略显松散的反馈而不如其他 Zenbook 机型。点击式键盘再次表现出色，12.7 x 9.7 厘米的尺寸也足够大。
显示屏 - 仍为 60 赫兹 OLED 屏幕
华硕仍然使用光洁度为 60 Hz 的 OLED 屏幕，不带触摸功能，分辨率为 1920 x 1200 像素（16:10）。主观画质仍然很好，黑色深邃，色彩丰富，但如果你习惯于更高的刷新率，60 Hz 的频率可能会是一个问题。480 Hz 时会出现 PWM 闪烁，但幅度很小，而且华硕提供了熟悉的软件解决方案，可实现无闪烁 OLED 调光。响应时间非常快，亮度和色温都可以自动控制。
三星 OLED 屏幕的面板 ID 与上一代机型相同 型号但亮度值略有提高：SDR 模式下为 408 尼特，HDR 模式下高达 625 尼特（全白图像为 604 尼特）。华硕再次实现了非常精确的色彩配置文件，您可以立即开始编辑图像。ARM Windows 不支持我们的校准软件，因此我们无法对面板进行校准。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 404 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
88.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.5% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
CCT: 6547 K
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA ATNA40CT06-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 LG Philips 140WUX, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 120 Hz | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon ED014.55, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6", 120 Hz | HP OmniBook X 14 BOE0C93, IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 LEN145WQ+, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5", 90 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8", 120 Hz | Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA ATNA40CT06-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -22% | 0% | -10% | 0% | -2% | -2% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.5 | 98.1 -1% | 64 -36% | 100 1% | 78.9 -21% | 97.3 -2% | 97 -3% | 97.8 -2% | 100 1% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.8 | 98.6 0% | 95.3 -4% | 99.9 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 100 1% | 98.2 -1% | 100 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 88.9 | 86.8 -2% | 66.2 -26% | 88.1 -1% | 78.7 -11% | 90.8 2% | 85.2 -4% | 87.3 -2% | 89.6 1% |
| Response Times | -1480% | -3805% | 49% | -3333% | 4% | -52% | -2185% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.22 ? | 24.3 ? -1892% | 57.7 ? -4630% | 0.51 ? 58% | 52 ? -4162% | 0.39 ? 68% | 0.83 ? 32% | 38.9 ? -3089% | 1.08 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.26 ? | 14.7 ? -1067% | 38.8 ? -2979% | 0.49 ? 61% | 32.8 ? -2503% | 0.71 ? 44% | 0.69 ? 45% | 17.4 ? -1281% | 1.17 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 480 ? | 120 ? | 360 ? | 240 | 480 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 15 | 11 27% | 30 -100% | 50 -233% | 22 -47% | ||||
| Screen | -22% | -17% | -16% | -59% | -4% | -7% | 16% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 404 | 546 35% | 561.2 39% | 514 27% | 303 -25% | 472 17% | 392 -3% | 606 50% | 386 -4% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 408 | 519 27% | 505 24% | 519 27% | 293 -28% | 475 16% | 398 -2% | 592 45% | 387 -5% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 90 -8% | 85 -13% | 92 -6% | 90 -8% | 97 -1% | 97 -1% | 94 -4% | 98 0% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.38 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.43 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 2.1 -91% | 2.09 -90% | 2.2 -100% | 2.6 -136% | 1.4 -27% | 1.3 -18% | 1.3 -18% | 0.9 18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.3 | 4 -21% | 4.37 -32% | 5.5 -67% | 5.4 -64% | 4.1 -24% | 3.2 3% | 2.1 36% | 1.7 48% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 3.3 -74% | 2.5 -32% | 1.5 21% | 3.7 -95% | 2 -5% | 2.3 -21% | 2.1 -11% | 1.5 21% |
| Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.09 105% | 2.21 100% | 2.24 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 6547 99% | 7127 91% | 6760 96% | 6340 103% | 6543 99% | 6493 100% | 6517 100% | 6842 95% | 6399 102% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1437 | 2551 | 1782 | 1409 | |||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.9 | 1.09 | |||||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -501% /
-281% | -1281% /
-707% | 11% /
4% | -1134% /
-641% | 0% /
-1% | -20% /
-17% | -724% /
-389% | 1% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.26 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.69 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.57 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.66 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.56 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.3 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 15 % | ≤ 83 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 83 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7920 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - Snapdragon X2 Elite
测试条件
华硕提供了熟悉的电源设置，可与 Windows 设置同步。我们在 "性能 "模式下进行了测试，以显示全新骁龙 X2 Elite 的最高性能，但在日常使用中，其性能仍然非常出色，比大多数竞争对手在 "耳语 " 模式下的性能都要好，在 "耳语 " 模式下几乎听不到风扇的声音。
| 电源模式 | TDP (瓦特) | Cinebench 2024 Multi (points) | Steel Nomad Light (points) | Cyberpunk 2077 1080p Med (fps) | 最大风扇噪音 (dB(A)) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whisper | 45/22/15 | 926 | 4264 | 28.4 | 28.1 |
| 标准 | 60/31/23 | 1240 | 4579 | 34,6 | 36.6 |
| 性能 | 60/31 | 1471 | 4877 | 42.7 | 51.7/48.7 |
| 电池 | 60/31 | 1452 | 4865 | 42.7 | 51.7/47.8 |
处理器 - X2E-88-100
Zenbook A14 配备了全新的骁龙 X2E-88-100，拥有 18 个 CPU 内核，性能非常出色。单核性能超越了任何其他 x86 芯片，仅略微落后于Apple M4。单核性能也比旧款骁龙 X1 Elite 高出 20%，甚至比旧款 Zenbook A14 的骁龙 X 高出 55%。多核性能甚至更好，新的骁龙处理器也明显优于Apple 的 M5 SoC 和所有直接的 x86 竞争对手。与旧款 Zenbook A14 相比，性能优势高达 128%。请参阅我们的 深入分析了解有关芯片和效率的更多信息。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (926 - 1471, n=4) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1471, n=74, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (149 - 153, n=2) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 200, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.6: Multi-Core | Single-Core
我们还在下表中列出了模拟基准测试。其性能再次非常出色，但与本机应用程序相比，显然要稍逊一筹。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 -9! | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2025 M5 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA -1! | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 -1! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 -1! | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ -1! | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 -1! | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 -1! | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 124284, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ (v6.92.6600) | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1353 - 3929, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
系统性能
主观性能印象依然出色，我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。兼容性仍然是个问题，但与去年相比，我们的体验要流畅得多，而且肯定有所改进。我们仍然建议您在购买骁龙笔记本电脑之前，先检查一下您的所有应用程序是否都能在 ARM 版 Windows 系统上运行。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (n=1) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (n=1) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (n=1) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100, Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (n=1) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109734, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 (n=1) | |
| Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
DPC 延迟
我们无法进行标准延迟测试，但 4K 视频播放并未出现掉帧现象。
存储设备
我们的评测机配备了美光 2600 1 TB 硬盘（可用容量为 891 GB）。PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的性能不错，尽管在持续工作负荷下传输速率会开始波动。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
新的 Adreno X2-90 GPUX2E-88-100 的新 Adreno X2-90 GPU 运行频率为 1700 MHz，功耗高达 18 瓦，与Apple 当前的 M5 10 核 GPU 基本相同，性能也基本相同。英特尔新的 Panther Lake GPU 速度更快，但功耗也更高，而旧的 Lunar Lake GPU 以及 AMD 的 Radeon 890M/880M 则被击败。与老款 Zenbook A14 相比，优势再次凸显。
游戏性能也非常出色，再次仅次于新的 Panther Lake iGPU。高通公司改进了兼容性，我们在游戏基准测试中遇到的问题更少了。现在支持 Game Pass，就像支持 Epic 的反作弊软件一样，所以你可以玩《堡垒之夜》等游戏。但仍有一些问题，例如我们无法运行 F1 24 或 F1 25。请参阅 我们的分析了解更多信息。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 23721 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 42419 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11814 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9530 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4098 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 1095 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 4877 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (76.3 - 227, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
| HP OmniBook X 14 | |
| Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 861, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 (320 - 405, n=2) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (195 - 396, n=12, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 142.9 | 134.5 | 74 | 33.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.7 | 86.3 | 78.2 | 69.4 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 89.7 | 55.5 | 31 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.2 | 48 | 42.5 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 67 | 53 | 51 | 48 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 237 | 91.2 | 76.9 | 68.9 |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 109 | 48 | 43 | 40 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 50.9 | 40.2 | 35.5 | 34.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 48.5 | 42.7 | 34.9 | 30.8 |
| Total War Pharaoh (2023) | 159.5 | 113 | 83.6 | 71.1 |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 23 | 22 | 18 | 14 |
排放与耗电量
系统噪音
即使在性能模式下，Zenbook A14 在日常使用中也能保持非常安静。如前所述，如果您不需要最高性能，我们会推荐您使用 "耳语 "模式，因为它的性能仍然非常出色，即使在最大负载情况下，您也只能勉强听到 28 分贝（A）的风扇声。在 "性能 "模式下，风扇的声音会变得更大（最高可达 51.7 dB(A)，然后很快稳定在 48.7 dB(A)）。我们没有听到任何其他电子噪音。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 41.3 / 51.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | HP OmniBook X 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 10% | 11% | 10% | 16% | 13% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.2 | 23 5% | 23.6 2% | 23.7 2% | 24.1 -0% | 24 1% | 23.8 2% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.2 | 23 5% | 23.6 2% | 23.7 2% | 24.1 -0% | 24 1% | 23.8 2% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.2 | 23 5% | 23.6 2% | 23.7 2% | 24.1 -0% | 24 1% | 23.8 2% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.2 | 23.1 5% | 25.1 -4% | 23.7 2% | 24.1 -0% | 26.3 -9% | 23.8 2% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 41.3 | 30.8 25% | 26.3 36% | 29.7 28% | 25.3 39% | 27.2 34% | 26 37% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 41.3 | 35.4 14% | 35.6 14% | 37.1 10% | 38.6 7% | 27.2 34% | 31.5 24% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 51.7 | 45.9 11% | 40.9 21% | 37.1 28% | 40.5 22% | 27.2 47% | 40.3 22% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度通常很低，唯一的例外是在性能 模式下对笔记本电脑施加压力时，底部的后部。高达 47 °C的温度并不严重，键盘的温度也更低。在我们的压力测试中，CPU 的功耗为 31 瓦。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.9 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.8 °C / 78.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+2.4 °C / 4.4 F).
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | HP OmniBook X 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 2% | 13% | -2% | -1% | -15% | -12% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 40.9 | 44.1 -8% | 37.8 8% | 44.3 -8% | 44.2 -8% | 44.9 -10% | 47.9 -17% | 47.1 -15% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 47.2 | 42.4 10% | 38.6 18% | 41.9 11% | 44.5 6% | 51.5 -9% | 51.3 -9% | 44.6 6% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 24.5 | 23.7 3% | 21.2 13% | 25.2 -3% | 25.1 -2% | 28.9 -18% | 26.7 -9% | 24.7 -1% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 24 | 23.8 1% | 21.4 11% | 25.4 -6% | 24.3 -1% | 29.4 -22% | 26.9 -12% | 24.5 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
扬声器的性能在这一细分市场中还算不错，尽管一些竞争对手如 XPS 14或 MagicBook Art 14提供了更好的音响系统。
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook X 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
空闲时的功耗比以前略高，但最大的不同显然是在负载情况下，新款 Zenbook A14 的功耗一度高达 102 瓦，然后降至 87 瓦和 65 瓦。因此，100 瓦的电源已经足够。
| Off / Standby | 0.48 / 0.19 Watt |
| Idle | 4.7 / 7.1 / 7.4 Watt |
| Load |
39.6 / 101.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90, Micron 2600 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QHK, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Micron MT001TAYAX8U40, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6" | HP OmniBook X 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2944x1840, 14.5" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, , OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, Samsung MZ9L4512HBLU-00BMV, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8" | Asus ZenBook A14 UX3407QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Average Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 31% | 23% | -6% | 27% | 8% | 9% | 35% | 45% | -6% | 8% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.7 | 1.8 62% | 1.6 66% | 5.8 -23% | 2.5 47% | 5.1 -9% | 5.4 -15% | 1.4 70% | 3.1 34% | 4.9 ? -4% | 3.91 ? 17% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7.1 | 9.3 -31% | 3.7 48% | 9.5 -34% | 4.7 34% | 8.4 -18% | 9.7 -37% | 6.3 11% | 5.2 27% | 7.6 ? -7% | 6.92 ? 3% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.4 | 9.4 -27% | 3.9 47% | 11.2 -51% | 6.2 16% | 8.6 -16% | 10.2 -38% | 7.6 -3% | 5.4 27% | 7.9 ? -7% | 8.22 ? -11% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 39.6 | 29.4 26% | 36 9% | 29.8 25% | 25.6 35% | 26.1 34% | 28.9 27% | 26.9 32% | 13.8 65% | 40.1 ? -1% | 42.1 ? -6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 65.3 | 18.9 71% | 50.9 22% | 45.4 30% | 40.3 38% | 37.2 43% | 24.7 62% | 38.5 41% | 19.6 70% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 31.4 | 17.7 44% | 47.7 -52% | 38.7 -23% | 36.7 -17% | 35.3 -12% | 22 30% | 19.7 37% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 101.8 | 30.4 70% | 80 21% | 68.1 33% | 67.9 33% | 67.1 34% | 68.2 33% | 40.7 60% | 46.8 54% | 115.4 ? -13% | 64.8 ? 36% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
在 150 尼特的 Wi-Fi 测试中，我们确定了 16 个小时的续航时间，这与 MacBook Air 13 M5 基本相同。不过，在面板亮度达到最大值时，Zenbook 仍能维持近 11 个小时，因此比 MacBook 多出 4 个小时。
笔记本检查评级
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA
- 04/07/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.5%  | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | 992 g | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
2. 91.6%  | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 Apple M5 10-Core ⎘ Apple M5 8-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1199€ | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" 2560x1664 225 PPI IPS |
3. 84.8%  | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,099.00 Dell XPS 14 9440 14.5" Noteb... 2. $1,263.99 Dell XPS 14 9440 AI Powered ... 3. $888.21 Dell 14 Plus Laptop DB14250-... List Price: 1600 USD | 1.5 kg | 15.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
4. 89.4%  | Honor MagicBook Art 14 Snapdragon Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB | List Price: 1699€ | 1 kg | 12.9 mm | 14.60" 3120x2080 257 PPI OLED |
5. 84.4%  | HP OmniBook X 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1299€ | 1.3 kg | 14.3 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS |
6. 86.4%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 14Q8X9 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,099.00 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8X9 20... 2. $909.00 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Laptop w... 3. $1,179.00 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14Q8X9 La... List Price: 1599€ | 1.3 kg | 15 mm | 14.50" 2944x1840 239 PPI OLED |
7. 85.1%  | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory | List Price: 1569€ | 1.2 kg | 10.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
8. 86.2%  | Microsoft Surface Laptop 7 13.8 Copilot+ Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1649€ | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" 2304x1536 201 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
