判决
与前几代产品类似，目前的 Yoga Slim 7a 14 采用了高品质的金属机身，与优雅的设计相结合，给人留下了良好的印象。
然而，14 英寸 Yoga 的超薄设计既是福也是祸。一方面，轻巧的重量和紧凑的尺寸令人愉悦，另一方面，该设备在连接性和性能方面较弱。
测试设备中安装的 Ryzen AI 7 445 APU 提供了稳定的速度，但如果有更强大的散热系统，可能会取得更好的成绩。特别是考虑到这个价位的设备已经有了更快的 iGPU，如 Radeon 860M 或 Arc Graphics 130V，而不是 Radeon 840M。
Yoga SLim 7a 14 的低功耗要求应该是积极的一面，它带来了良好的电池续航时间。此外，OLED 显示屏色彩鲜艳，对比度出色。
与此同时，联想在组件方面的可持续性较差，这一点可能会受到批评。例如，内存是焊接的，而且只有一个小的 M.2 2242 插槽。
尽管如此，联想 Yoga Slim 7a 14 对于经常外出的人来说还是值得推荐的。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
联想 Yoga Slim 7a 14 的竞争对手包括基于 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350的笔记本电脑，例如旧款 Yoga Slim 7和 IdeaPad Pro 5.
基于英特尔酷睿 5 226V-的产品，包括 华硕 VivoBook S 14和 宏碁 Swift 14 AI同样采用 14 英寸机身，价格不到 1,500 欧元。
规格
建设
联想 Yoga Slim 7a 14 的制造质量非常出色。我们尤其喜欢它将近 170° 的开合角度。
另一方面，做工还可以更好一些。例如，我们测试设备的侧面和底板没有完全整齐或均匀地融合在一起。
Yoga Slim 7a 14 的亮点当然是它的低重量。约 1.15 千克的重量携带起来非常舒适。14 毫米的高度也相对较低。
设备
这款 14 英寸 Yoga 最大的缺点之一就是缺乏连接性。买家不仅要忍受没有 LAN 端口的烦恼，还要忍受没有读卡器、音频插座和 HDMI 端口的烦恼。
此外，还缺少一个 USB Type-A 端口。不过，这款子笔记本提供了三个 USB-C 端口，每个都支持 Power Delivery 和 DisplayPort。其中两个还支持现代的 USB 4 标准，这意味着在连接性方面不需要削减太多的点。
网络摄像头快门值得称赞，尤其是网络摄像头的成像质量高于平均水平。在我们使用华硕 RT-BE96U Wi-Fi 7 路由器进行的测试中，来自联发科的 Wi-Fi 7 模块也表现出色。
只需拧松四颗 Torx 螺钉，就能对机箱进行维修。机身下方的散热解决方案有两个风扇和两根热管。
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2248 - 4510, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A18 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive GT-BE19000 WiFi7 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1917 - 3363, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card (n=1) | |
| Gigabyte Gaming A18 Pro | |
网络摄像头
维护
输入设备
输入设备是联想笔记本电脑的典型优势。除了布局，键盘的键形和两段式白色照明也令人印象深刻。
触控板的尺寸为 13.5 厘米 x 8 厘米，光滑宜人。
显示屏
OLED 显示屏的分辨率高达 2,880 x 1,800 像素，格式为 16:10，确保画面非常清晰。得益于出色的黑度，对比度远远超过传统的 IPS 面板。
色彩空间也令人印象深刻。即使是 AdobeRGB 也几乎完全覆盖。
响应时间和可视角度也无可挑剔。与此同时，光面有时会产生强烈的反光，这也是个问题。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 485 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.74}
calibrated: 1.81
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.99}
94.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.219
CCT: 6338 K
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Samsung ATNA40YK11-0 (SDC4181), OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 90 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | 0% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 98.4 -2% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94.2 | 87.8 -7% | 94.5 0% | 97.6 4% |
| Response Times | -3% | -2% | -80% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.4 ? | 0.4 ? -0% | 0.39 ? 2% | 0.8 ? -100% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.5 ? | 0.49 ? 2% | 0.49 ? 2% | 0.8 ? -60% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 600 ? | 1200 ? | 1200 ? | 60 ? |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 20 | 22 -10% | 22 -10% | |
| Screen | 15% | 8% | -29% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 485 | 478 -1% | 473 -2% | 500 3% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 488 | 484 -1% | 474 -3% | 499 2% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 97 -1% | 99 1% | 97 -1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 1 52% | 1.2 43% | 3.55 -69% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.79 | 2.3 66% | 3.8 44% | 6.38 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.81 | 2.55 -41% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.4 -27% | 1.5 -36% | 2.2 -100% |
| Gamma | 2.219 99% | 2.25 98% | 2.27 97% | 1.94 113% |
| CCT | 6338 103% | 6521 100% | 6214 105% | 6405 101% |
| Contrast (:1) | 50000 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
6% | 2% /
3% | -36% /
-30% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.2 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 600 Hz Amplitude: 20 % |  | |
| ≤ 80 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 600 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 80 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 600 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. Flickering occurs at relatively low brightness settings, so extended use at this brightness setting or lower can cause eyestrain. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7907 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
由于内存无法扩展，测试版的买家只能长期使用 16GB LPDDR5X 内存。如果需要，可以更换 1 TB SSD。
测试条件
Fn+Q 组合键可用于在联想 Yoga Slim 7a 的三种运行模式之间切换。由于性能配置文件在性能方面几乎没有任何改进，我们的测量是在自适应配置文件下进行的。
| 模式 | 电池 | 自适应 | 性能 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 33 dB(A) | 37 dB(A) | 41 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧速率（FHD/超高清） | 9.7 帧/秒 | 11 帧/秒 | 11.7 帧/秒 |
| GPU 功耗 | ~15 W | ~23 W | ~28 W |
| CPU PL1 | 20 W | 38 W | 41 W |
| CPU PL2 | 40 W | 51 W | 51 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 1429 分 | 1717 分 | 1722 分 |
处理器
......（英文 Ryzen AI 7 445基于 AMD 的 Zen 5 架构（4 纳米），配备 6 个内核，可通过 SMT 处理多达 12 个并行线程。CPU 的性能有点令人沮丧。
数值徘徊在 酷睿至尊 5 226V.旧版 Ryzen AI 7 350的速度要快得多，至少在对比设备中是如此。
Cinebench R15 多核循环
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (17966 - 18237, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (74431 - 74977, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (2798 - 2812, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (9270 - 9280, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (37793 - 37941, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (56825 - 56960, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 124284, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (751 - 751, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (9668 - 9943, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (38654 - 46615, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
事实证明，系统性能并不出众。Yoga Slim 7a 在同类产品中排名中等。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU -5! | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (6801 - 7458, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4920 - 8424, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8552 - 11406, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (9889 - 10346, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (12393 - 14337, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 16132, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5722 - 12442, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (6966 - 7588, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (1592 - 1597, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (1516 - 1564, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (1630 - 1750, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (1416 - 1570, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (288 - 309, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (242 - 260, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445, AMD Radeon 840M (479 - 480, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6801 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (84523 - 85004, n=2) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109734, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (62676 - 62823, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (109818 - 112844, n=2) | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 (109 - 113.6, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.8 - 187.8, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
虽然 LatencyMon 工具提到在某些应用中可能会出现问题，但延迟时间相对较好。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
乍一看，美光的 NVMe 硬盘在读取和写入时都表现出色。不过，在我们的循环测试中，一段时间后性能会出现明显波动。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
Ryzen AI 7 445 集成了 Radeon 840M无法与更好的 Radeon 860M860M 竞争。
根据 3DMark 测试，Radeon 840M 平均落后 40% 以上。与速度更快的 Arc Graphics 130V相比，情况也差不多。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 -1! | |
| Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA -1! | |
| Average AMD Radeon 840M | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 6985 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21576 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3598 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1590 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
Radeon 840M 只适合较老或要求不高的游戏。如果不使用 FSR，目前的游戏甚至无法在最低设置下以 1,920 x 1,080 分辨率流畅运行。
不过，在我们的 赛博朋克 2077测试中的 GPU 性能在较长时间内都相当稳定。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 148.8 | 130 | 46.1 | 19.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 136.8 | 103.2 | 63.7 | 56.5 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.7 | 37.7 | 31.2 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 20.6 | 17.6 | 13.4 | 12.5 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 23.5 | 17.1 | 13.6 | 11 |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 13.4 | 9.91 | 7.61 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 32.8 | 27.4 | 18.5 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 14.4 | 9.5 | 7 | |
| Resident Evil Requiem (2026) | 20.3 | 13.3 | 9.21 | |
| Death Stranding 2 (2026) | 10.6 | 8.73 | 8.16 | |
| Crimson Desert (2026) | 14 | 7.38 | 6.76 |
| ARC Raiders - 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (32.8 - 76.3, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI | |
| Average AMD Radeon 840M (32.8 - 39.8, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana - 1920x1080 Low AA:T | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI | |
| Average AMD Radeon 840M (14.4 - 17.2, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (n=1last 2 years) | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 - 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI | |
| Average AMD Radeon 840M (13.4 - 16.4, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (n=1last 2 years) | |
赛博朋克 2077 1080p 超高 FPS 图表
排放量
噪音排放
噪音排放基本不明显。在空闲模式下，风扇通常处于关闭状态或仅以非常微弱的声音转动。
在负载情况下，自适应模式会产生 37 dB(A) 至 43 dB(A) 的噪音水平，虽然听得见，但并不扰人。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24 / 25 / 26 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40 / 43 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -6% | 4% | -4% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 24 -0% | 23.6 2% | 24.2 -1% | 25 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24 | 24 -0% | 23.6 2% | 24.2 -1% | 25 -4% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25 | 24 4% | 23.6 6% | 24.2 3% | 26 -4% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 26 | 27.2 -5% | 23.6 9% | 24.2 7% | 29 -12% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 40 | 44.1 -10% | 46.5 -16% | 28.8 28% | 40 -0% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 37 | 44.1 -19% | 48.9 -32% | 37.6 -2% | 40 -8% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 43 | 44.1 -3% | 48.9 -14% | 45.6 -6% | 41 5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度情况类似。在空闲模式下，机箱温度保持在 30 °C以下，但在游戏时，个别区域的温度高达 45 °C（上图）和 46 °C（下图）。
这一结果与竞争对手基本一致。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-5.8 °C / -10.4 F).
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | 8% | 6% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 45 | 44 2% | 42.2 6% | 38.4 15% | 41 9% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 46 | 42.9 7% | 42.4 8% | 49.7 -8% | 45 2% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 27 | 26.5 2% | 25.4 6% | 25.1 7% | 26 4% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 29 | 26.7 8% | 25.7 11% | 25.8 11% | 28 3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具完成压力测试后，CPU 的温度略高于 60 °C，这个温度值非常适中。
扬声器
音质很稳定，但没有什么值得称道的地方。低音效果尤其有待改进。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
功耗仍在可控范围内。就速度而言，空闲时约 5 瓦，负载时约 60 瓦是合理的，尽管英特尔的酷睿 Ultra 5 226V 更经济。
令人遗憾和恼火的是，我们的测试样品没有配备电源装置。USB-C 供电最高支持 65 W。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.3 Watt |
| Idle | 5.1 / 5.3 / 6.2 Watt |
| Load |
58 / 72 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -17% | -30% | 16% | 6% | -0% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.1 | 5.2 -2% | 5.1 -0% | 2.7 47% | 5 2% | 3.94 ? 23% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 5.3 | 7.8 -47% | 6.8 -28% | 6.7 -26% | 6 -13% | 6.9 ? -30% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 6.2 | 8.1 -31% | 6.9 -11% | 6.9 -11% | 10 -61% | 8.21 ? -32% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 58 | 64.3 -11% | 71.7 -24% | 34.5 41% | 36 38% | 42.3 ? 27% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 57.3 | 65.4 -14% | 84.8 -48% | 43 25% | 41.6 27% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 54.8 | 64 -17% | 83.5 -52% | 41.9 24% | 38.2 30% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 72 | 68.5 5% | 104.8 -46% | 62.7 13% | 60 17% | 65.1 ? 10% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量：赛博朋克 2077 / 压力测试
耗电量：外部显示器
电池寿命
Yoga Slim 7a 14 在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下进行了近 9 小时的 Wi-Fi 浏览测试，这本身就是一个不错的成绩，但与竞争对手相比还有差距。
也许电池模式下的省电机制还存在一些问题。
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 Ryzen AI 7 445, Radeon 840M, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 70 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, 84 Wh | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 75 Wh | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 65 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 12% | 54% | 91% | 40% | 52% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 9 | 10.1 12% | 13.9 54% | 17.2 91% | 12.6 40% | 13.7 ? 52% |
| H.264 (h) | 15.9 | 19.6 | 20 | 15.7 ? | ||
| Load (h) | 1 | 0.9 | 2.9 | 1.93 ? |
Notebookcheck 对联想 Yoga Slim 7a 14 的总体印象
联想 Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 是一款优雅的超轻薄笔记本，因其高移动性而大放异彩。
不过，如果你看重 3D 性能，最好选择配备快速 Radeon 860M iGPU 及以上的设备。
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11
- 04/10/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84.1%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7a 14AGP11 AMD Ryzen AI 7 445 ⎘ AMD Radeon 840M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1299 EUR | 1.2 kg | 14 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 85.3%  | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $909.00 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X Laptop w... 2. $990.03 Lenovo Slim 7i Aura Edition ... 3. $1,169.99 Lenovo Yoga Slim 7X 3K OLED ... List Price: 1299€ | 1.2 kg | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
3. 87.4%  | Lenovo IdeaPad Pro 5 14AKP G10 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 989€ | 1.4 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
4. 85.9%  | Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1099€ | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
5. 83.5%  | Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-51-58TU Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | List Price: 1200 EUR | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
