评语 - 14 英寸多才多艺的 Krackan Point
Yoga 7 2 合 1 已经多次证明了自己的品质。虽然按照 14 英寸的标准，它的时尚外壳并不算超轻，但它拥有高品质的材料和良好的稳定性。由于没有 USB 4 接口，它的连接功能略显逊色，但对于这个级别的设备来说已经足够。除了高反光表面、不太完美的亮度（关键词：户外使用）和画面闪烁（最高亮度为 90%）之外，这款笔记本电脑的显示屏同样令人印象深刻。与典型的 OLED 显示屏一样，它以出色的黑度、极高的对比度和丰富的色域吸引消费者。
不过，我们测试的这款 AKP10 83JR002UGE 型号的真正亮点是它采用了来自 Krackan Point 系列的全新 Ryzen AI 5 340，有望在性能和能耗需求之间取得良好平衡。事实上，除了 CPU 性能之外，它的电池续航时间也同样令人印象深刻。竞争是存在的，尤其是来自联想的竞争，因为联想也推出了配备英特尔处理器的 Yoga 7 2 合 1。
Pros
Cons
规格
案例
正如我们在介绍中提到的，这款笔记本电脑的外壳非常出色，给人留下了深刻印象。它的重量略低于 1.4 千克，比其他 14 英寸笔记本电脑轻一些，但与羽量级笔记本电脑如 ZenBook 14等轻量级产品相比，它的重量要轻一些。顺便说一句，联想笔记本电脑的屏幕折叠功能非常好用--相应的机构开发得非常出色。在设备的触摸显示屏上使用笔输入也是如此；制造商直接随笔记本电脑提供了合适的笔。与我们最近测试过的 Yoga 机型相比，该机型的颜色选择令人兴奋：83JR002UGE 不采用灰色（月光灰），而是采用了蓝色（潮汐茶色）。
连接性
不同型号的笔记本电脑在连接选项和安排上存在一定差异。一般来说，AKP10 基于 G10配备了英特尔 CPU，但其 USB 端口最高支持 10 Gbps，而两个 Type-C 接口至少支持 PowerDelivery 3.1 和 DisplayPort（1x 1.4a，1x 2.1）。它还配备了一个平均速度的 microSD 读卡器、一个音频插孔和一个 HDMI 2.1 输出。由于支持 Wi-Fi 7，来自联发科（MediaTek）的无线模块（MT7925）是最先进的，而且在我们的范围测试中，它的速度丝毫没有令人失望。按照笔记本电脑的标准，该设备的全高清网络摄像头可呈现相当清晰的图像，甚至还有一个机械盖。与此同时，Yoga 7 几乎没有任何维护或升级选项，因为它的内存是完全焊接上去的，只有一个 M.2 插槽（更糟糕的是，只有 M.2 2242）。从另一方面看，制造商的无塑料包装值得称赞。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 (Amgelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.4 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (25.2 - 256, n=28, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 (Amgelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
交流
网络摄像头
输入设备
联想笔记本电脑一直以其高于平均水平的输入设备而闻名。Yoga 7 2 合 1 也不例外，它的键盘布局和输入手感应该能满足经常打字的用户。当然，它还配备了背光（多级白色）。触摸板在我们的测试中表现良好，12 x 7.5 厘米的面积足够大。
显示屏
根据型号的不同，建议谨慎使用显示屏。有些机型只配备了低色彩和相当迟钝的 IPS 面板，如 14IML9配备 Core Ultra 5 125U。除此之外，还有两种支持 HDR 的 OLED 面板--一种频率为 120 Hz，分辨率为 2,880 x 1,800 像素（见配备 Core Ultra 7 258V 的 G10），另一种频率为 60 Hz，分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素，如图所示。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 360 cd/m²
Contrast: 360000:1 (Black: 0.001 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.187
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Lenovo LEN140WUXGA, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey Lenovo LEN140WUXGA (LEN88AC), OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -0% | -51% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 98.5 | 99.8 1% | 99.9 1% | 41.6 -58% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 62.1 -38% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 99.9 | 96.1 -4% | 98.1 -2% | 43 -57% |
| Response Times | 179% | -2% | -1478% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.5 ? | 0.42 ? 72% | 1.6 ? -7% | 25.7 ? -1613% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.4 ? | 0.51 ? 64% | 1.4 ? -0% | 20.2 ? -1343% |
| PWM Frequency | 240 ? | 1200 400% | 240 ? 0% | |
| Screen | -15% | -20% | -3527% | |
| Brightness middle | 360 | 472 31% | 358 -1% | 335.1 -7% |
| Brightness | 357 | 474 33% | 354 -1% | 321 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 98 1% | 96 -1% | 91 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.001 | 0.002 -100% | 0.31 -30900% | |
| Contrast | 360000 | 179000 -50% | 1081 -100% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.12 | 2.6 -23% | 2.37 -12% | 5.05 -138% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.59 | 7 -53% | 5.11 -11% | 18.98 -314% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 1.8 5% | 1.9 -0% | 2.11 -11% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 2.8 -100% | 1.5 -7% | 5 -257% |
| Gamma | 2.187 101% | 2.25 98% | 2.249 98% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6366 102% | 6306 103% | 6282 103% | 6436 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 54% /
33% | -7% /
-13% | -1685% /
-2489% |
* ... smaller is better
高分辨率机型的亮度大约高出 100 cd/m²（474 cd/m² 对 357 cd/m²），但在色彩空间覆盖率（约 100% DCI-P3 或 AdobeRGB）或色彩准确度等其他方面的数值却相当接近。
OLED 的优势还包括响应时间短、对比度高。不过，敏感的人可能会遇到屏幕闪烁的问题（根据我们的测量，闪烁频率为 240 Hz），亮度最高可达 90%。
同时，光亮的显示屏表面也是一个品味问题，用户往往不得不面对在强烈光源下或室外恼人的反光。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 20 % | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8458 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
我们测试的版本属于中端设备，与其约 1000 美元的价格相称。从长远来看，16 GB 内存可能会有点紧张，尤其是 iGPU 占用了部分内存。另一方面，如果用户对空间的需求增加，更换 512GB SSD 也不成问题。
测试条件
预装的联想 Vantage 软件提供三种配置文件，即自适应、电池保护和性能，我们在测试中使用了后者（仅在平衡模式下进行了电池测量）。您可以从下表中看到性能和噪音水平的差异。
| 联想 Vantage 模式 | 省电模式 | 自适应（自动） | 性能 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 33 dB(A) | 40 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清） | 9.5fps | 11.5fps | 12.2fps |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 1242 分 | 1772 分 | 1807 分 |
| CPU PL1 | 20 瓦 | 32 瓦 | 35 瓦 |
| CPU PL2 | 30 瓦 | 41 瓦 | 51 瓦 |
处理器
Ryzen AI 5 340 基于 Zen 5，配备 6 个内核，最多可并行处理 12 个线程（请参阅 "CPU "页面）。 CPU 页面了解更多规格）。在性能模式下，联想为这款 4 纳米芯片提供了 35 瓦的 PL1 和 51 瓦的 PL2，从而带来了良好的性能。在我们的基准测试中，AI 5 340 比稍老的 Ryzen 5 8640HS和英特尔同类产品 酷睿至尊 7 258V.在 Cinebench 循环测试中，AI 5 340 的性能始终保持领先，这一点为它加分不少，而英特尔机型的情况却并非如此。
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (2179 - 64158, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (11392 - 183760, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (797 - 8151, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (22413 - 145339, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1120 - 29155, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (5749 - 97193, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (21774 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (218 - 2001, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (1169 - 34297, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (16583 - 81626, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，AKP10 与 G10 并驾齐驱，这次英特尔版本略胜一筹。从主观上看，笔记本电脑的反应（开机时间、程序启动时间等）非常迅速。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 -2! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M -2! | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey -4! | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (3229 - 9125, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (7233 - 12222, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (5062 - 10591, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (2496 - 16551, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (524 - 2274, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (554 - 1925, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
| Average of class Convertible (550 - 2949, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (381 - 1868, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 317, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (407 - 1089, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, AMD Radeon 840M (n=1) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6762 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (29473 - 158525, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (28905 - 126517, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (30591 - 216896, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.7 - 173, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
它的延迟时间并不值得夸耀。16,324 µs 是我们记录过的最差数值之一。所有其他 Yoga 型号的延迟时间都明显更短。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
所安装的 WD 512GB SSD（PC SN7100S）性能非常稳定，在我们的测试中名列其他 Yoga 代表产品之首。值得肯定的是：在 DiskSpd 循环中没有出现明显的性能下降，即使在长期运行中也是如此。
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
AI 5 340 的图形加速器是配备 256 个着色器单元的 Radeon 840M，不出所料，它无法与功能更强大的 800 系列变体（如 Radeon 840M、Radeon 840M、Radeon 840M、Radeon 860M、Radeon 860M、Radeon 860M）相提并论。860M配备 512 个着色器、 880M配备 768 个着色器、 890M配备 1,024 个着色器）。旧版 Radeon 760M在合成测试中也领先，差距约为 20%。酷睿至尊 7 258V 的 弧形图形 140V甚至快了约 50%。另一方面，840M 至少比 超 5 125U's 4 核显卡.您可以在我们的 GPU 页面。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 34953 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 28720 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8814 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 157139 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26645 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5208 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1928 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (8.2 - 75.6, n=38, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (9.2 - 85.3, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.14 - 89.5, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Average of class Convertible (4.48 - 86.6, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (10.8 - 167.9, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (18.8 - 142, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 | |
| Average of class Convertible (12.8 - 82.3, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 163.2 | 151.5 | 45.4 | 18.3 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 167.5 | 124.5 | 73.7 | 66 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 61.1 | 25.6 | 16.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 59 | 42 | 36.5 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 131.9 | 50.6 | 41.1 | 34.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 23.1 | 18.6 | 13.3 | 12.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 24.8 | 18.4 | 15.2 | 12.2 |
| Counter-Strike 2 (2023) | 84.4 | 68 | 29.6 | |
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 162.8 | 113.5 | ||
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 22.5 | 16.7 | 14.7 | |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 18.2 | 15.4 | 10.6 | |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 15.3 | 11.3 | ||
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 20.1 | 15.9 | 13.2 | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 10.5 | 8.78 | 6.43 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 44 | 38 | 27 | |
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 7.5 | 6.63 | 5.29 | |
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 15.9 | 13.8 | 12.2 | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 25.9 | 16.1 | 10.5 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 11.9 | 10.1 | 8.1 | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 13.8 | 0 () | ||
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 23.8 | 17.1 | 13.9 | |
| Civilization 7 (2025) | 78.5 | 39.1 | 20.1 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 12 | 11 | 9 |
像往常一样，我们用《赛博朋克 2077》测试了其 3D 性能在较长时间内的表现。 赛博朋克 2077(全高清/超高清）进行测试。结果如何？它的帧率保持得很好很稳定。
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
排放量
噪音排放
Yoga 7 在空闲模式下通常非常安静。它的风扇经常完全停止运转，因此设备几乎没有噪音。在负载模式下，性能模式下的背景噪音为 42 至 44 dB(A)，与搭载 Ryzen 5 8640HS 的版本相近，但并不令人讨厌。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25 / 27 / 30 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43 / 44 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M | Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey R5 8640HS, Radeon 760M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | 1% | 15% | |
| off / environment * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 25 -0% | 23 8% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25 | 23.4 6% | 25 -0% | 23 8% |
| Idle Average * | 27 | 23.4 13% | 26 4% | 23 15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 23.4 22% | 30 -0% | 23 23% |
| Load Average * | 43 | 37.2 13% | 43 -0% | 29.5 31% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42 | 37.2 11% | 42 -0% | 36.2 14% |
| Load Maximum * | 44 | 43 2% | 43 2% | 41.3 6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在温度方面，情况也很相似，笔记本电脑的温度值也与 14AHP9几乎是 1:1。上侧最高 47 °C，下侧最高 49 °C，温度并不低，但只要不把设备放在大腿上（英特尔笔记本的温度仍然较低），这个温度还是可以接受的，尤其是在我们的测试过程中，手掌区域的温度从未超过 33 °C。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the class Convertible.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33 °C / 91.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-5 °C / -9 F).
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M | Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey R5 8640HS, Radeon 760M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 14% | 5% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 41.5 12% | 44 6% | 38 19% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 49 | 40.8 17% | 47 4% | 39.6 19% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28 | 24.8 11% | 27 4% | 30 -7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 29 | 24.7 15% | 27 7% | 31 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，Ryzen AI 5 340 的平均升温温度略低于 90°--这在某种程度上是不理想的结果。
发言人
它的音质高于平均水平，尤其是考虑到笔记本电脑 14 英寸的小巧尺寸。不出所料，低音方面还有待改进。
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
Yoga 7 最大的亮点之一就是它的低功耗：5.0 瓦的平均闲置功耗非常出色，是测试领域的最佳值。在负载情况下，这款 14 英寸设备的功耗为 52 至 68 瓦，就所提供的 CPU 功耗而言，这也是可以接受的--尽管事实证明英特尔的同类产品在这方面更加节俭。联想配备了 65 瓦的电源。
| Off / Standby | 0.5 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 4 / 5 / 7 Watt |
| Load |
52 / 68 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M | Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey R5 8640HS, Radeon 760M | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | -8% | 10% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 4.3 -8% | 4.4 -10% | 4.2 -5% | 4.84 ? -21% |
| Idle Average * | 5 | 6.9 -38% | 5.2 -4% | 5.7 -14% | 7.64 ? -53% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7 | 7.1 -1% | 9.9 -41% | 5.9 16% | 10.2 ? -46% |
| Load Average * | 52 | 41.3 21% | 52.5 -1% | 42.4 18% | 45.7 ? 12% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54.8 | 41.9 24% | 55.4 -1% | 40.5 26% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 52.6 | 38 28% | 52.7 -0% | 38.2 27% | |
| Load Maximum * | 68 | 61.6 9% | 67 1% | 64.5 5% | 67.7 ? -0% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
在电池模式/不连接电源的情况下，英特尔机型的节能机制似乎更积极，因为 AMD 机型的运行时间更短。在我们看来，将亮度降至 150 cd/m² 时，测试设备在 WLAN 测试中的运行时间接近 11.5 小时，仍然是一个非常不错的成绩。
| Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10 Ryzen AI 5 340, Radeon 840M, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 14 2in1 G10 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 70 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AHP9 Arctic Grey R5 8640HS, Radeon 760M, 71 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14IML9 Ultra 5 125U, Graphics 4-Core, 71 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 21% | -3% | 43% | -6% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 686 | 833 21% | 663 -3% | 981 43% | 644 ? -6% |
| H.264 | 1238 | 898 ? | |||
| Load | 119 | 134 | 112.1 ? | ||
| Reader / Idle | 2331 | 1402 ? |
Notebookcheck 总评分
在我们的测试中，联想 Yoga 7 2 合 1 14AKP10 被证明是一款高品质的可折叠电脑，其 Ryzen AI 5 340 在性能和能耗方面表现出色。
Lenovo Yoga 7 2-in-1 14AKP10
- 05/05/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
