微星 WE72 7RJ (7700HQ, 全高清, M2200) 工作站简短评测
MSI WE72 7RJ (WE72 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1037 MHz, RAM: 1377 MHz, GDDR5, 377.11, Optimus
Memory
32 GB
, 2x 16 GB DDR4-2400, Dual-Channel, 2/2 slots in use, up to 32 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LP173WF4-SPF1, IPS, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel HM175
Storage
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, 256 GB
, (+1 TB HDD HTS721010A9E630), 1100 GB free
Weight
2.924 kg, Power Supply: 593 g
Price
1799 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T570-20HAS01E00 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LP173WF4-SPF1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 305.7 cd/m² Minimum: 4.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 301 cd/m²
Contrast: 974:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 6.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 7.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
85.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
85.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.08
CCT: 7020 K
| MSI WE72 7RJ LP173WF4-SPF1, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell Precision 7710 SDC8151, VHN17_173HL, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 LEN4123, , 3840x2160, 17.3" | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA SDC3854, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 8% | 30% | 8% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 67.4 | 66.6 -1% | 90.8 35% | 67.3 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 85.3 | 96.9 14% | 100 17% | 95.9 12% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 62.4 | 68.6 10% | 85.4 37% | 69 11% |
| Response Times | -24% | -1% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 45.2 ? | 50 ? -11% | 44 ? 3% | 50.4 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 26.4 ? | 36 ? -36% | 27.6 ? -5% | 28.4 ? -8% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 198 ? | 228 ? | 200 ? | |
| Screen | 13% | 11% | 23% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 302 | 332 10% | 365 21% | 252 -17% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 306 | 307 0% | 341 11% | 243 -21% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 93 | 83 -11% | 85 -9% | 86 -8% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.31 | 0.33 -6% | 0.4 -29% | 0.21 32% |
| Contrast (:1) | 974 | 1006 3% | 913 -6% | 1200 23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 3 52% | 3.8 39% | 2.2 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.6 | 3.8 64% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 4 45% | 6.09 17% | 2.7 63% |
| Gamma | 2.08 106% | 2 110% | 2.3 96% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 7020 93% | 7089 92% | 6332 103% | 6686 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) (%) | 56 | 62 11% | 76.01 36% | 62 11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) (%) | 85.2 | 97 14% | 99.97 17% | 96 13% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
7% | 13% /
13% | 7% /
15% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 26.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 77 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4295 points | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5150 points | |
Help | ||
| MSI WE72 7RJ Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | MSI GE72 7RE-046 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY | Dell Precision 5520 UHD Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -44% | 30% | -45% | 10% | 9% | |
| Read Seq (MB/s) | 1492 | 509 -66% | 1481 -1% | 540 -64% | 2253 51% | 2141 43% |
| Write Seq (MB/s) | 1512 | 457.8 -70% | 1243 -18% | 495.7 -67% | 1662 10% | 1621 7% |
| Read 512 (MB/s) | 312.6 | 420.3 34% | 1202 285% | 455.1 46% | 459.1 47% | 499.7 60% |
| Write 512 (MB/s) | 1483 | 420.5 -72% | 1163 -22% | 481.4 -68% | 1611 9% | 1531 3% |
| Read 4k (MB/s) | 59.9 | 29.88 -50% | 58.7 -2% | 22.7 -62% | 56.1 -6% | 54.2 -10% |
| Write 4k (MB/s) | 184.2 | 104.1 -43% | 207.4 13% | 112.9 -39% | 169.4 -8% | 158.2 -14% |
| Read 4k QD32 (MB/s) | 681 | 391.8 -42% | 832 22% | 372.5 -45% | 633 -7% | 632 -7% |
| Write 4k QD32 (MB/s) | 590 | 350.4 -41% | 377.9 -36% | 212.9 -64% | 506 -14% | 527 -11% |
Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e
Sequential Read:
1492 MB/s
Sequential Write:
1512 MB/s
512K Read:
312.6 MB/s
512K Write:
1483 MB/s
4K Read:
59.9 MB/s
4K Write:
184.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
681 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
590 MB/s
| LuxMark v2.0 64Bit | |
| Room GPUs-only | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Sala GPUs-only | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Gigabyte P57X v7 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Acer Predator 15 G9-592-7925 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| Asus FX553VD-DM249T | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
| Dell Precision 5520 UHD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| HP Omen 17-w010ng | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| MSI GE72VR-6RF16H21 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA | |
| Dell Precision 7710 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P70 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad P50 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 26834 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 24622 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 7453 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 93770 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 20388 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 5252 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 2627 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1845 points | |
Help | ||
| Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:4x | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| For Honor - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:8x | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| Razer Blade (2017) | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Schenker XMG P407 | |
| Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
| MSI GE72 965M Ti | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| MSI GL62M 7RD-077 | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.9 GHz, 460) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 381.4 | 238.8 | 149.3 | 70.2 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 229.4 | 177.2 | 155.5 | 58.6 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 171.5 | 148.3 | 115.9 | 47.8 |
| Thief (2014) | 108.8 | 88.6 | 74.8 | 39.6 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 116.6 | 68.4 | 37.8 | 20.3 |
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 148.8 | 119 | 56.4 | 48.2 |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 214.2 | 131.2 | 70.4 | 52.4 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 128.7 | 72.8 | 40.7 | 34.4 |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 139.4 | 105.3 | 47.1 | 42 |
| For Honor (2017) | 78 | 52.3 | 50.5 | 36.2 |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 83.4 | 37.1 | 33.7 | 17.6 |
Noise level
| Idle |
| 36.3 / 36.3 / 36.6 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40.4 / 46.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.4 °C / 104.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-12.5 °C / -22.5 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 40.4 °C / 104.7 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-12.5 °C / -22.5 F).
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.57 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 15 / 20.1 / 23.8 Watt |
| Load |
85.6 / 128 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, Samsung SM961 MZVPW256 m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 6820HQ, Quadro M3000M, Samsung SSD PM871 MZNLN512HCJH, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ256G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -14% | 3% | 13% | 0% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 15 | 6.04 60% | 12.1 19% | 6.7 55% | 14 7% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 20.1 | 15.2 24% | 19.7 2% | 12.5 38% | 20 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 23.8 | 42.3 -78% | 20.5 14% | 13.2 45% | 25 -5% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 85.6 | 112.8 -32% | 94.3 -10% | 128.2 -50% | 82 4% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 128 | 182.2 -42% | 139.6 -9% | 158.9 -24% | 135 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
| MSI WE72 7RJ i7-7700HQ, Quadro M2200, 51 Wh | Dell Precision 7710 E3-1535M v5, FirePro W7170M, 72 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P70 6820HQ, Quadro M3000M, 96 Wh | HP ZBook 17 G3 TZV66eA E3-1535M v5, Quadro M3000M, 96 Wh | MSI GE72 7RE-046 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 51.4 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 112% | 95% | 134% | 7% | |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 4.5 | 12.9 187% | 7.7 71% | 15.9 253% | |
| H.264 (h) | 3 | 4.7 57% | 7.5 150% | 5 67% | 3.3 10% |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 3 | 6.1 103% | 6 100% | 4.8 60% | 3.1 3% |
| Load (h) | 0.7 | 1.4 100% | 1.1 57% | 1.8 157% |
Pros
+ 良好的构建质量
+ 体面的全高清 IPS显示屏
+ 良好的键盘与显示
+ 系统性能高
+ 全面而且有用的工具（风扇控制）
Cons
- 非常慢的读卡器
- 处理器温度高
- 处理器负载调节（仅处理器负载）
- 电源适配器电力不足
- 风扇声音大
- 电池容量小和运行时间短
- 没有雷电3
- 几乎没有任何商务功能
MSI GE72是一款不错的游戏本，是否配备了专业的显卡以创造出一个优秀的移动工作站？ 我们在测试后不信服，而它的竞争对手让处境变得更难。你会经常被提醒它是一个游戏本。没有对接端口，也没有雷电3，所以你不能使用拓展坞。
这可能不是一个严重的问题，它取决于您的使用情况，但在性能和排放方面该机也有局限性。由于处理器的散热有问题，因为即使我们只用Cinebench来对处理器施压，核心频率也会（节流）下降。当您给所有组件施压时，120瓦的电源适配器是另一个不足之处。风扇也有空间进行优化，这可以通过预先安装的风扇控制软件来实现。然而，由于高温，没有太多的净空。
有限的商务能和薄弱的冷却能力：微星新移动工作站给人的印象并不是很有说服力。 在大工作量下WE72还是有意义的，尤其是当您考虑到富有吸引力的定价时。
MSI WE72的一个优势是价格有竞争力（1799美元），因为其竞争对手戴尔Precision系列或ThinkPad P型号的花费普遍在3000美元以上。 如果您主要使用MSI WE72来运行CAD应用程序，并且可以接受上述缺点，您应该将其放在您的候选名单上。
注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。
MSI WE72 7RJ
- 05/09/2017 v6 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Workstation - Weighted Average
Price comparison
