联想 Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD) 变形本简短评测

Name: Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST
Brand: Lenovo

令人失望的屏幕。 联想的14寸变形本售价约为500欧元（约合533美元）。买家将会得到Stoney Ridge APU以及固态硬盘，4GB运行内存。因为一块可视角度欠佳的TN屏幕，使得联想留下的好印象全毁了。

Sascha Mölck, ✓ Stefanie Voigt (translated by Delta Zhang), Published 04/11/2017 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Bristol Ridge / Stoney Ridge Convertible / 2-in-1 Touchscreen Windows

Test device courtesy of notebooksbilliger.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Yoga 510-14AST (Yoga 510 Series)

Processor

AMD A9-9410 2 x 2.9 - 3.5 GHz, Stoney Ridge

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), Core: 800 MHz, 单通道, Crimson 17.2.1

Memory

4 GB

, DDR4-2132, 单通道, 一条内存插槽 (占用)

Display

14.00 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel 112 PPI, 电容屏, 10 点触控, 支持主动客制化, AU Optronics B140XTN02.E, TN LED, glossy: yes

Mainboard

AMD CZ FCH

Soundcard

Realtek ALC236 @ AMD K15.7 - High Definition Audio Controller

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 复合音频接口, Card Reader: SD卡读卡器, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: 动作传感器

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 20.9 x 336.4 x 232

Battery

35 Wh, 4510 mAh Lithium-Ion, 8.7 V

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Additional features

Speakers: 立体声扬声器, Keyboard: 巧克力键盘, Keyboard Light: no, Lenovo Photo Master, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), MS Office 365 (trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.75 kg, Power Supply: 176 g

Price

499 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng DIN A4 ❌

Left: Cable lock slot, power-in, USB 2.0 (Type A), combo audio, memory card reader (SD), One Key Recovery button

Right: Power button, 2x USB 3.1 Gen 1 (Type-A), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng	68.1 MB/s +6%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST	64.1 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB	59.7 MB/s -7%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng	87.5 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST	86.7 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB	85.3 MB/s -2%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	349 MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	332 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	347 MBit/s +85%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter	188 MBit/s


219 cd/m²	222 cd/m²	222 cd/m²
217 cd/m²	242 cd/m²	229 cd/m²
214 cd/m²	226 cd/m²	225 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B140XTN02.E tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 242 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 224 cd/m² Minimum: 24.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 242 cd/m²
Contrast: 390:1 (Black: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 13.03 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 14.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
52% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
33% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.28% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
51.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
34.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST TN LED, 1366x768, 14.00	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB IPS, 1920x1080, 14.00	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Display		22%	15%	17%
Display P3 Coverage	34.15	41.78 22%	39.43 15%	39.99 17%
sRGB Coverage	51.4	62.9 22%	59.1 15%	59.5 16%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	35.28	43.17 22%	40.76 16%	41.32 17%
Response Times		-5%	30%	14%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	70 ?(32, 38)	53 ?(20, 33) 24%	38 ?(14, 24) 46%	56 ?(18, 38) 20%
Response Time Black / White *	29 ?(23, 6)	39 ?(12, 27) -34%	25 ?(6, 19) 14%	27 ?(8, 19) 7%
PWM Frequency		350 ?(60)
Screen		37%	39%	49%
Brightness middle	242	243 0%	277 14%	245 1%
Brightness	224	248 11%	263 17%	233 4%
Brightness Distribution	88	91 3%	88 0%	87 -1%
Black Level *	0.62	0.32 48%	0.31 50%	0.21 66%
Contrast	390	759 95%	894 129%	1167 199%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	13.03	5.44 58%	5.57 57%	4.2 68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.79	9.73 48%	13.6 28%	8.75 53%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	14.6	4.74 68%	4.56 69%	3.94 73%
Gamma	2.22 ^99%	2.38 ^92%	2.28 ^96%	2.66 ^83%
CCT	18869 ^34%	7799 ^83%	6648 ^98%	6096 ^107%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	33	39.6 20%	38 15%	38 15%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	52	62.5 20%	59 13%	59 13%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		18% / 28%	28% / 33%	27% / 38%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 23 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
70 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 32 ms rise
70 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 38 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms).

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

3497

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

4619

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

2694

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

16.56 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

1.59 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

0.82 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

22.71 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

130 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

63 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	130 Points +106%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	126 Points +100%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel Core i3-6100U	96 Points +52%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	92 Points +46%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel Core m3-6Y30	85 Points +35%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	74 Points +17%
Lenovo M30-70 Intel Core i3-4010U	68 Points +8%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	63 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	53 Points -16%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	37 Points -41%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	332 Points +155%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	328 Points +152%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel Core i3-6100U	240 Points +85%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	216 Points +66%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel Core m3-6Y30	208 Points +60%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	187 Points +44%
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599 Intel Core i3-4010U	173 Points +33%
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599 Intel Core i3-4010U	173 Points +33%
Lenovo M30-70 Intel Core i3-4010U	170 Points +31%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	165 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	130 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	68 Points -48%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	3.67 Points +131%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	2.4 Points +51%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	2.09 Points +31%
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599 Intel Core i3-4010U	1.85 Points +16%
Lenovo M30-70 Intel Core i3-4010U	1.8 Points +13%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	1.59 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	0.86 Points -46%
CPU Single 64Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	1.38 Points +68%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	1.04 Points +27%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	0.82 Points
Medion Akoya S4217T MD98599 Intel Core i3-4010U	0.77 Points -6%
Lenovo M30-70 Intel Core i3-4010U	0.73 Points -11%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	0.66 Points -20%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	0.41 Points -50%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	11347 Points +146%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	7321 Points +58%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	6309 Points +37%
Lenovo M30-70 Intel Core i3-4010U	5584 Points +21%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	5284 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	4619 Points
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	2256 Points -51%
Rendering Single 32Bit
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	4986 Points +85%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	3477 Points +29%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	2777 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	2694 Points
Lenovo M30-70 Intel Core i3-4010U	2447 Points -9%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	1677 Points -38%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	1216 Points -55%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	2852 Points +34%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	2459 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	2134 Points
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	1788 Points -16%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	1362 Points -36%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6431 Points +95%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	4686 Points +42%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	4425 Points +34%
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	3755 Points +14%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	3299 Points

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	3576 Points +68%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	2133 Points
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	1555 Points -27%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	6725 Points +111%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	4162 Points +31%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	3182 Points

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel Core i5-7200U	211.4 Points +62%
HP Pavilion x2 12-b000ng Intel Core m3-6Y30	133.5 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD A9-9410	130.4 Points
Lenovo B50-70 MCC2GGE Intel Core i3-4030U	123.2 Points -6%
Asus Zenbook UX360CA-FC060T Intel Core m3-6Y30	111.1 Points -15%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel Core i3-6100U	90.9 Points -30%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H Intel Pentium N4200	89.1 Points -32%
HP 250 G5 Y1V08UT Intel Celeron N3060	58.5 Points -55%

PCMark 7 Score		3814 points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		2670 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		2898 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3728 points
Help

... in comparison

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Radeon R5 M430, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	3550 Points +33%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	3274 Points +23%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	3224 Points +21%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410	2670 Points
Work Score Accelerated v2
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	4121 Points +11%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	4050 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410	3728 Points

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Sequential Read: 434.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 207.7 MB/s

512K Read: 356.3 MB/s

512K Write: 195.6 MB/s

4K Read: 26.71 MB/s

4K Write: 56.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 176.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 163.3 MB/s

	Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		61%	-87%
Read Seq	434.6	518 19%	104.8 -76%
Write Seq	207.7	476.5 129%	91 -56%
Read 512	356.3	408 15%	20.67 -94%
Write 512	195.6	274.5 40%	45.05 -77%
Read 4k	26.71	35.66 34%	0.215 -99%
Write 4k	56.8	106.7 88%	1.037 -98%
Read 4k QD32	176.3	368.7 109%	0.968 -99%
Write 4k QD32	163.3	246.3 51%	1.09 -99%

3DMark 06 Standard Score		5141 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		3346 points
3DMark 11 Performance		1199 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		36896 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		3010 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		712 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		344 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		274 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U	1643 Points +38%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	1390 Points +17%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	1213 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9410	1190 Points

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	6799 Points +43%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	6249 Points +31%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U	5249 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9410	4755 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB AMD Radeon R5 M430, Intel Core i5-7200U	989 Points +28%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), AMD A9-9410	772 Points
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U	762 Points -1%
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i3-6100U	752 Points -3%

	low	med.	high	ultra
World of Warcraft (2005)	82.6	43.7
Deus Ex Human Revolution (2011)	62.4		29
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (2011)	32.7	22.2	15.4
Diablo III (2012)	59.6	41.8	33.6
Counter-Strike: GO (2012)	39.2	28.5	25
Dead Space 3 (2013)	63.9	31	26.6
Tomb Raider (2013)	51.9	25.7	18.2
BioShock Infinite (2013)	43.5	26.9	22.2
X-Plane 10.25 (2013)	31.7	17.7	9.6
GRID: Autosport (2014)	65.1	29.7
Risen 3: Titan Lords (2014)	20.9	12.9
Sims 4 (2014)	111.9	34.3
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014)	22.3	13.8
F1 2014 (2014)	39	30
Dragon Age: Inquisition (2014)	19.3	14.8
Dirt Rally (2015)	59.7	22
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	34.1	24.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	33.1	23.2
World of Warships (2015)	37.7	28.8
Rainbow Six Siege (2015)	26.9	21.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	16.1	10.4
The Division (2016)	18.2	11.3
Civilization VI (2016)	29.4	12.1
Farming Simulator 17 (2016)	53.4	36.1
Resident Evil 7 (2017)	28.6	13.2
For Honor (2017)	19.9	7.3
Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017)	10.9	5.2

BioShock Infinite | Tomb Raider | GRID: Autosport

BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410	43.5 fps
Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 HD Graphics 520, 6100U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	42.77 fps -2%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB Radeon R5 M430, i5-7200U, Samsung MZYTY256HDHP	42.3 fps -3%
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	38.6 fps -11%
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	22.2 fps -49%

Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Low Preset
HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, HGST Travelstar 5K1000 HTS541010A7E630	62.1 fps +20%
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410	51.9 fps
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	31.2 fps -40%

GRID: Autosport - 1024x768 Ultra Low Preset
Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), A9-9410	65.1 fps
Acer Aspire ES1-332-P91H HD Graphics 505, Pentium N4200, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0	51.5 fps -21%

Noise Level

Idle		30.4 / 30.4 / 30.4 dB(A)
Load		31.3 / 33.3 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 30.4 dB(A)

	Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520
Noise		-5%	-5%	-2%
off / environment *	30.4	29 5%	30.5 -0%	30.5 -0%
Idle Minimum *	30.4	29 5%	31.3 -3%	30.5 -0%
Idle Average *	30.4	29 5%	31.3 -3%	30.5 -0%
Idle Maximum *	30.4	29 5%	31.6 -4%	30.6 -1%
Load Average *	31.3	37.3 -19%	34.2 -9%	31 1%
Load Maximum *	33.3	43.1 -29%	37.3 -12%	36.8 -11%

* ... smaller is better

Max. Load

Idle


25.4 °C	34.5 °C	32.3 °C
24.4 °C	30.8 °C	29.4 °C
23.4 °C	23 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 34.5 °C
Average: 27.7 °C


28.7 °C	39 °C	32.3 °C
25.7 °C	33.8 °C	25 °C
24.1 °C	22.8 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 39 °C
Average: 28.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.7 °C / 82 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.5 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 55.7 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.7 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.3 °C / 79.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.8 °C / 3.3 F).

	Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520
Heat		-6%	10%	-0%
Maximum Upper Side *	34.5	40.1 -16%	34.6 -0%	38.3 -11%
Maximum Bottom *	39	46.1 -18%	36.4 7%	42.5 -9%
Idle Upper Side *	30.8	28.5 7%	26.6 14%	28.7 7%
Idle Bottom *	33.4	31.6 5%	27.7 17%	29.4 12%

* ... smaller is better

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.25 / 0.28 Watt
Idle	3.9 / 7.4 / 9.4 Watt
Load	19.2 / 22.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520
Power Consumption		-40%	-17%	-1%
Idle Minimum *	3.9	3.9 -0%	4.7 -21%	4.1 -5%
Idle Average *	7.4	7.1 4%	7.2 3%	6.8 8%
Idle Maximum *	9.4	7.7 18%	7.9 16%	7.9 16%
Load Average *	19.2	33.4 -74%	30 -56%	20.4 -6%
Load Maximum *	22.5	55.9 -148%	29 -29%	26.8 -19%

* ... smaller is better

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		14h 07min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)		5h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		5h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 52min

	Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST A9-9410, Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge), 35 Wh	Lenovo Yoga 510-14IKB i5-7200U, Radeon R5 M430, 35 Wh	HP Pavilion x360 13-u102ng i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh	Acer Spin 5 SP513-51 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime		-4%	-13%	16%
Reader / Idle	847	722 -15%	560 -34%	749 -12%
H.264	306		320 5%
WiFi v1.3	325	373 15%	322 -1%	463 42%
Load	112	100 -11%	86 -23%	133 19%

Pros

+ 制造出色

+ 运行安静

+ 温度较低

+ 键盘出色

+ 固态硬盘

+ AC无线网卡

Cons

- 窄视角TN屏

- 低亮度，低对比度屏幕

- 电池续航时间偏短

- 缺少USB Type-c接口

In review: Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST 80S90018GE. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

联想以 Yoga 510-14AST的形式提供了一个之前我们测试过的Yoga 510-15IKB的廉价版。售价500欧元左右，Yoga510-14AST比测试过的姊妹版足足便宜了400欧元之多。新的斯通利之桥APU的确很好地压缩了价格。CPU足以应付它用来处理的应用，并且GPU能在处理单元和渲染单元上与Intel HD520分庭抗礼。

Yoga 在整个负载范围内都能安静的运行，发热水平也仅是温热而已。固态硬盘保证了系统的高速运行。需要多余128GB存储空间的用于可以将其换成更高容量的型号。更换操作需要移除笔记本的底壳。内置的键盘整体上比较吸引人，甚至能够承担较为频繁的打字操作。电池续航时间偏短。

屏幕令人失望，对此负责的联想员工似乎认为在变形本上搭载一块窄视角TN屏幕是个好选择。

再者，它也是一块低亮度，第对比度，色彩还原度很糟糕的面板。由于屏幕的选择，联想使其设备的吸引力大幅度下降。这真是太糟糕了考虑到联想实际上设计了一台全面的设备而且肯定会吸引很多的买家。显然也不能去选择另一个型号，所有的14AST系列型号都搭载了这块糟糕的屏幕，令人无法理解。

想要获得广视角屏幕的用户将需要考虑基于英特尔平台的Yoga产品。Yoga 510-14IKB 80VB0081GE大约贵50欧元（约合53美元），搭载有性能强得多的酷睿 i3-7100U处理器以及一块广视角全高清IPS屏幕。因此，很难找到理由去购买AMD平台的型号。

注：本文是基于完整评测的缩减版本，阅读完整的英文评测，请点击这里。

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST - 2017-03-23 03/23/2017 v6^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

81 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

79%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

48 / 80 → 59%

Weight

66 / 35-78 → 72%

Battery

82%

Display

71%

Games Performance

54 / 68 → 79%

Application Performance

65 / 87 → 75%

Temperature

94%

Noise

94%

Audio

44 / 91 → 48%

Camera

27 / 85 → 32%

Average

69%

78%

Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想 Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD) 变形本简短评测

Sascha Mölck, 2017-04-11 (Update: 2017-04-11)

联想 Yoga 510-14AST (A9-9410, HD) 变形本简短评测

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

Lenovo Yoga 510-14AST audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pros

Cons

More articles related to this device

Pricecompare