Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 5 210H

Intel Core 5 210H

英特尔酷睿 5 210H 是 Raptor Lake-H 系列(Alder Lake 架构)笔记本电脑的中端移动 CPU。它于 2024 年底发布,提供 6 个高性能核心中的 4 个(P 核心,Golden Cove 架构)和 8 个高效核心中的 4 个(E 核心,Gracemont 架构)。P 核心支持超线程技术,与 E 核心结合可产生 12 个处理线程。高性能集群的时钟频率范围为 2.2 至 4.8 GHz(单核提升),高效集群的时钟频率范围为 1.6 至 3.6 GHz。E 核心的性能应与旧版 Skylake 核心相近(类似于 酷睿 i7-6700HQ).所有内核均可访问 12 MB L3 高速缓存。

与旧版 酷睿 i5-13420H相比,酷睿 5 210H 的时钟速度略有提高(例如,提升内核速度 + 200 MHz)。

性能

得益于更高的时钟速度,酷睿 5 210H 可以超越老款 酷睿 i5-13420H尤其是在单线程工作负载中。

特性

集成内存控制器支持各种内存类型,最高可达 DDR5-5200(高于 i5-12500H 的 DDR5-4800)。线程指令(硬件)可帮助操作系统决定在性能或高效内核上使用哪个线程,以获得最佳性能。对于人工智能任务,CPU 还集成了 GNA 3.0 和 DL Boost(通过 AVX2)。第 8 版的 Quick Sync 与 Rocket Lake CPU 相同,支持 MPEG-2、AVC、VC-1 解码、JPEG、VP8 解码、VP9、HEVC 和 AV1 硬件解码。CPU 现在支持用于 GPU 的 PCIe 5.0 x8 和用于 SSD 的两个 PCIe 4.0 x4。

集成图形适配器基于 Xe 架构,可提供 96 个 EU(执行单元)中的 48 个。

CPU 的基本额定功率为 45 瓦(PL2 为 115 瓦),但大多数笔记本电脑的 PL1 约为 60 瓦。SoC 采用英特尔改进的 10 纳米工艺制造,即英特尔 7。

CodenameRaptor Lake-H Refresh
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-H

Series: Raptor Lake-H Raptor Lake-H Refresh

Intel Core 9 270H2 - 5.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 7 250H1.8 - 5.4 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 7 240H1.8 - 5.2 GHz10 / 16 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core 5 220H2 - 4.9 GHz12 / 16 cores18 MB L3
Intel Core 5 210H « 1.6 - 4.8 GHz8 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Clock Rate1600 - 4800 MHz
Level 1 Cache704 KB
Level 2 Cache8 MB
Level 3 Cache12 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 12
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
4 x 3.6 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)45 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA1744
FeaturesThread Director
GPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs ( - 1400 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date12/18/2024
Product Link (external)www.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
36.5 pt (61%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -94%
...
35.9 -2%
36 -1%
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
36 -1%
36.1 -1%
36.3 -1%
36.3 -1%
36.3 -1%
36.4 0%
36.4 0%
Intel Core 5 210H
36.5
36.6 0%
36.6 0%
36.6 0%
36.8 1%
37 1%
37.1 2%
37.1 2%
37.1 2%
37.2 2%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 37%
max:
60.1 65%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 105.4     avg: 106     median: 106 (53%)     max: 106.6 Points
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 404     avg: 545     median: 545 (10%)     max: 686 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8784     avg: 11074     median: 11830 (11%)     max: 12609 Points
AMD E1-2100
202 -98%
...
10605 -4%
10623 -4%
10653 -4%
10775 -3%
10857 -2%
10889 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7735H
10920 -1%
10921 -1%
10923 -1%
Intel Core 5 210H
11074
11198 1%
Intel Core i5-12450HX
11390 3%
11486 4%
11507 4%
11515 4%
11525 4%
11604 5%
11637 5%
11662 5%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
39065 253%
max:
107681 872%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1767     avg: 1773     median: 1771 (72%)     max: 1780 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 678     avg: 681     median: 681 (74%)     max: 685 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3410     avg: 4234     median: 4436 (11%)     max: 4855 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1483     avg: 1697     median: 1757 (11%)     max: 1850 Points
AMD A4-1200
31 -98%
...
1656 -2%
1658 -2%
1663 -2%
1664 -2%
1676 -1%
1679 -1%
Intel Xeon W-2145
1682 -1%
1690 0%
1691 0%
Intel Core 5 210H
1697
1698 0%
1701 0%
1701 0%
1718 1%
1736 2%
1736 2%
1739 2%
1739 2%
1752 3%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
6043 256%
max:
15842 834%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 247     avg: 249     median: 247 (68%)     max: 253 Points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 32815     avg: 41822     median: 45778 (26%)     max: 46873 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5324     avg: 5377     median: 5386 (63%)     max: 5422 MIPS
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 8.63     avg: 12.2     median: 13.4 (24%)     max: 14.6 fps
05101520Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 442     avg: 596     median: 520 (7%)     max: 827 Seconds
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 265     avg: 331     median: 275 (2%)     max: 453 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.473     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (11%)     max: 0.4932 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
13159 Points (28%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
62195 Points (48%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 16886     avg: 18980     median: 19698 (49%)     max: 20356 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
98528 Points (80%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 10388     avg: 14271     median: 15977 (40%)     max: 16449 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 19622     avg: 23001     median: 24650 (44%)     max: 24730 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 6295     avg: 8478     median: 9252 (39%)     max: 9888 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 2199     avg: 2379     median: 2415.5 (56%)     max: 2484 points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 9321     avg: 9843     median: 9616.5 (37%)     max: 10816 points
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1699     avg: 1726     median: 1734 (58%)     max: 1746 points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 8250     avg: 8905     median: 8899 (16%)     max: 9567 points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 529     avg: 534     median: 530 (1%)     max: 543 ms
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 240     avg: 250     median: 254 (66%)     max: 256 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 277     avg: 281     median: 281 (50%)     max: 285 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1618     avg: 1632     median: 1631.5 (61%)     max: 1645 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 46.4     avg: 74.9     median: 67.6 (12%)     max: 110.6 Watt
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 66.8     avg: 67.2     median: 67.2 (12%)     max: 67.6 Watt
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.2     avg: 12.2     median: 8.7 (6%)     max: 20.8 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 8.3     avg: 11.2     median: 10.2 (7%)     max: 15 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 22.2     avg: 24.1     median: 24.1 (18%)     max: 26 Points per Watt
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.35
log 14. 03:19:43

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Dec 2025 05:40:54 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.011s ... 0.012s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.012s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#8 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.013s

#9 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 18679 +0.019s ... 0.032s

#11 got single benchmarks 18679 +0.02s ... 0.052s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.711s ... 0.763s

#14 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.763s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.763s

Reviews for the Intel Core 5 210H processor

联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 笔记本电脑评测:英特尔酷睿 i5 对 AMD Ryzen 5

联想 IdeaPad Slim 5 16 笔记本电脑评测:英特尔酷睿 i5 对 AMD Ryzen 5

与 AMD 相比,英特尔配置提供了更高的性能,休闲编辑和游戏玩家可能会喜欢。否则,对于典型的浏览或文字处理场景而言,其优势微乎其微。...
Intel Core 5 210H | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
配备 RTX 5050 的 Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 评测

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 评测:评估 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑作为中低端 GPU 的价值

Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 是第一款登陆我们编辑部的基于GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop 的笔记本电脑。我们的评测对 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑进行了测试,以了解新的中低端 Blackwell GPU 在与 RTX 5060 和 RTX 5070 的对比中表现如何,以及这款 17...
Intel Core 5 210H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | 17.30" | 2.7 kg
联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R 笔记本电脑评测:英特尔酷睿 5 210H 首次亮相

联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R 笔记本电脑评测:英特尔酷睿 5 210H 首次亮相

最新的 IdeaPad Slim 3 15 终于换成了 16:10 显示屏。此外还提供 OLED 和金属结构等更理想的功能,但需要额外付费。
Intel Core 5 210H | Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | 15.30" | 1.7 kg

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRH10: Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 16IRH10

Asus V16 V3607VU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus V16 V3607VU

Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G8 IRL: Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G8 IRL

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10, Core 5 210H: Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 15.30", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10, Core 5 210H

Motorola Moto Book 60: Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Motorola Moto Book 60

Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX607VJ: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Asus TUF Gaming F16 FX607VJ

Lenovo Ideapad Slim 5 16IRH10R: Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 16.00", 1.9 kg
   » 英特尔酷睿 5 210H 与 AMD Ryzen AI 5 330:预算性能之争

Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 15IRH10R: Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs, 15.30", 1.7 kg
   » 酷睿 5 210H 与酷睿 5 120U 相比,尽管是 H 系列处理器,但性能却相差无几

   » 2025 联想 IdeaPad Slim 3 15 为该系列带来了一些急需的变化

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Raptor Lake-H

» Intel Core 9 270H
   14x 2 GHz - 5.8 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13900HK
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13905H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i9-13900H
   14x 1.9 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13800H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core 7 250H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5.4 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13705H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13700H
   14x 1.8 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core 7 240H
   10x 1.8 GHz - 5.2 GHz
» Intel Core i7-13620H
   10x 1.8 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core 5 220H
   12x 2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13600H
   12x 2.1 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13505H
   12x 1.9 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13500H
   12x 1.9 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core 5 210H
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core i5-13420H
   8x 1.5 GHz - 4.6 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 5 7545U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7545U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 215
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core 5 210H
   8x 1.6 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 5 150
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.55 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.55 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.5 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)