判决
凭借 Nitro V14 AI,宏碁推出了一款特别小巧的游戏笔记本电脑。Nitro V14 AI 采用白色机身,看起来很清新,一眼就能吸引人的眼球,不过在稳定性方面仍有改进的余地。
输入设备和连接给人留下了良好的印象,但在同类产品中不一定是最好的。
您也不要指望 Nitro V14 AI 能提供顶级性能。GeForce RTX 5050 显卡的 TGP 被限制在 60 W,这在一定程度上低于其性能。
在游戏过程中,有时甚至在空闲状态下,Nitro V14 AI 的噪音仍然相当大,这就是为什么我们希望其后续产品能配备更好、更强大的散热系统或改进风扇控制。
尽管如此,由于 Nitro V14 AI 有两个 SO-DIMM 组和两个完整的 M.2 插槽,可扩展或可更换的内存和固态硬盘还是有加分的。
IPS 显示屏的亮度约为 300 cd/m²,不算特别亮,但也能满足大多数买家的要求。
不过,这款 14.5 英寸笔记本电脑的绝对亮点是其宽裕的电池续航时间。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,该设备的续航时间接近 13 小时,几乎超过了所有竞争对手,可谓物超所值。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
经过评测的宏碁 Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT 在多家在线商店(如notebooksbilliger.de)的售价约为 1150 欧元。虽然这种配置尚未上市,但在美国亚马逊上,配备 Ryzen 5 240 和 RTX 5050 的 Nitro V16 AI 售价为 799 美元。
说到竞争对手,宏碁 Nitro V14 AI 的竞争对手包括 15 英寸以下的廉价游戏笔记本电脑,这些笔记本电脑配备了 英伟达GeForce RTX 5050 笔记本电脑或 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑如 惠普 Victus 15和 联想 LOQ 15.
此外,目前还有一款更昂贵的中端参考机型 联想Legion 5以及同样昂贵的 XMG Core 15.
我们几乎没有测试过配备 RTX 5000 GPU 的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,除了 雷蛇刀锋 14和 华硕 ROG Zephyrus G14之外,我们几乎没有测试过配备 RTX 5000 GPU 的 14 英寸笔记本电脑。 RTX 5070和 RTX 5070 Ti和 RTX 5070 Ti。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
从外观上看,这款机箱的设计非常出色。我们可以用 "成功 "来形容它的设计,而且由于颜色较浅,指纹也不是问题。
不过,做工还可以更稳定一些。在较强的压力下,一些表面会明显变形,尤其是宏碁完全依赖于塑料。
对于一款 14.5 英寸游戏笔记本电脑来说,1.7 千克的重量既不算低,也不算高。相比之下,性能更稳定、质量更高的 Blade 14 重量仅轻约 0.1 千克。来自 Razer 的竞争对手 Nitro V14 AI 的厚度也更薄,仅为 16.2 毫米,而 Nitro V14 AI 为 21.9 毫米。
在基本尺寸方面,Blade 14 也胜出一筹,不过这主要是由于屏幕对角线略小(14 英寸对 14.5 英寸)。尽管如此,与典型的 15 英寸笔记本电脑相比,Nitro V14 AI 仍然显得非常小巧。
连接性
宏碁为 Nitro V14 AI 配备了两个 USB-A 端口和一个支持 USB4 标准的现代 USB Type-C 端口。此外,还有一个 HDMI 2.1 端口、一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔和一个 Kensington 锁开口。
卡槽有 microSD 插槽。读卡器的性能与 Nitro V16 相似,仅提供 USB 2.0 级别的速度。
我们的测试设备采用了联发科 RZ616 Wi-Fi 6E 芯片,在发射时能达到不错的数值,而在接收时则能达到出色的数值。
Nitro V14 AI 的全高清网络摄像头比许多竞争对手的摄像头都要清晰一些,不过你不应该期望它在图像质量方面创造奇迹。色彩精确度也是如此。
要进入内部工作区,必须拧松七颗十字螺丝,然后将底部从固定装置中撬出(后一步并不那么简单)。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (20 - 210, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.5 - 261, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
网络摄像头

维护
输入设备
通常情况下,键盘的布局取决于个人喜好。右侧边缘有各种特殊按键,用于多媒体控制和打开制造商的软件。
我们认为,除功能键外,其他按键的大小都比较合适,橡胶圆顶开关的键入手感虽然不是特别出色,但也还过得去。我们对触摸板的评价也是 "可用"。
触摸板的表面积为 12.6 厘米 x 7.8 厘米,以 14 英寸的标准来看已经相当不错,不过我们希望表面能更光滑一些。
显示屏
宏碁为这款机型选择了分辨率为 1920 x 1200 的 16:10 显示屏。价格更高的机型可达到 2,560 x 1,600 像素。
虽然 312 cd/m² 左右的亮度只是一般水平,但显示屏几乎覆盖了 100%的 sRGB 色彩空间。例如,这比 Nitro V16 和 Victus 15 的覆盖范围都要大。
可视角度、响应时间、黑电平和对比度也并不出众,符合对 IPS 面板的预期。一个积极的方面是,开箱即用的色彩已经非常均衡。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 330 cd/m²
Contrast: 1320:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.07 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
calibrated: 1.04
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
71.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
68.9% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.245
CCT: 6733 K
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT MNE507QS2-2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14.5", 120 Hz | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 B160UAN08.3 (AUO2CB8), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 180 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) NE153QDM-NZ2 (BOE0D5F), IPS, 2560x1600, 15.3", 300 Hz | Razer Blade 14 2025 ATNA40CU05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -42% | -41% | -1% | 28% | 3% | 24% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 68.9 | 39.2 -43% | 43 -38% | 67.3 -2% | 99.9 45% | 71.7 4% | 99.5 44% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 98.5 | 58.2 -41% | 64.3 -35% | 99.2 1% | 100 2% | 99.9 1% | 100 2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 71.2 | 40.5 -43% | 34.7 -51% | 69.1 -3% | 98.3 38% | 73.6 3% | 89.2 25% |
| Response Times | 62% | 0% | -12% | 99% | 66% | 98% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 30.5 ? | 11.6 ? 62% | 28.6 ? 6% | 33.9 ? -11% | 0.42 ? 99% | 12.4 ? 59% | 0.59 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 18.8 ? | 7.4 ? 61% | 20 ? -6% | 21.2 ? -13% | 0.4 ? 98% | 5 ? 73% | 0.63 ? 97% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1152 ? | 960 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | 26 | |||||
| Screen | -171% | -128% | -6% | 31% | -38% | -20% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 330 | 384 16% | 324 -2% | 318 -4% | 492 49% | 545 65% | 361 9% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 312 | 372 19% | 303 -3% | 300 -4% | 495 59% | 530 70% | 363 16% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 84 | 92 10% | 87 4% | 89 6% | 92 10% | 94 12% | 98 17% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.25 | 0.36 -44% | 0.26 -4% | 0.2 20% | 0.54 -116% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 1320 | 1067 -19% | 1246 -6% | 1590 20% | 1009 -24% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.07 | 5.82 -444% | 4.7 -339% | 1.33 -24% | 0.9 16% | 2.29 -114% | 1.7 -59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.7 | 20.34 -450% | 18.19 -392% | 4.42 -19% | 1.8 51% | 5.42 -46% | 3.9 -5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.04 | 3.95 -280% | 2.93 -182% | 0.94 10% | 1.05 -1% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 5.4 -350% | 3.9 -225% | 1.9 -58% | 1.2 -0% | 3.5 -192% | 2.4 -100% |
| Gamma | 2.245 98% | 2.174 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.187 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.317 95% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 6733 97% | 6067 107% | 7541 86% | 6678 97% | 6291 103% | 6957 93% | 6571 99% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -50% /
-110% | -56% /
-91% | -6% /
-6% | 53% /
42% | 10% /
-15% | 34% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.5 ms rise | |
| ↘ 9.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.4 ms rise | |
| ↘ 16.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.6 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8098 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
在德国的在线商店中,Nitro V14 目前配备了 AMD Ryzen AI 5 340或 Ryzen AI 7 350以及 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5050 笔记本电脑或 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑。
这两种配置都属于中端配置。我们的测试设备还配备了 16 GB DDR5 内存(2x 8 GB)和 1 TB 固态硬盘。
| 模式 | 静音 | 平衡 | 性能 | 涡轮增压 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 43 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) | 56 dB(A) | 58 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧速率(FHD/超高清) | 44.8 fps | 62.2 fps | 64.2 fps | 67.3 fps |
| GPU 功耗 | ~40 W | ~55 W | ~60 W | ~60 W |
| CPU PL1 | 35 W | 45 W | 50 W | 54 W |
| CPU PL2 | 55 W | 60 W | 65 W | 70 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 1819 分 | 1943 分 | 1989 分 | 1997 分 |
处理器
AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 配备了 6 个 Zen 5 内核,通过 SMT 可以并行处理多达 12 个线程。
在基准测试运行中,其性能与旧版的 Ryzen 5 240的性能相差甚远,甚至略低于 Nitro V16。
不过,Nitro V14 AI 的 Ryzen AI 5 340 性能超过了 酷睿 i5-13420HVictus 15 中的 Core i5-13420H。
Cinebench R15 多回路测试
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (18609 - 20152, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 238426, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (71462 - 78994, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 9817, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (3007 - 3167, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (54807 - 55142, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (9906 - 9976, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 128721, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (38271 - 42354, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (59709 - 63356, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (771 - 829, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (10029 - 11005, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (35050 - 39747, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
系统性能
系统的整体性能处于比较列表的中间位置,与价格相称。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) -3! | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9667, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 12600, n=126, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=122, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7100 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (61336 - 86573, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (62186 - 63523, n=2) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (78594 - 107475, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 (95 - 103.8, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
与某些竞争对手相比,西部数据的 1 TB 固态硬盘往往是 NVMe 性能较弱的型号之一,尤其是在长时间使用过程中会出现某些波动和轻微下降。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
与 CPU 类似,GPU 也无法释放全部潜能。3DMark 基准测试显示,RTX 5050 笔记本电脑的运行速度略低于之前确定的该显卡的平均水平。
Victus 15 和 Nitro V16 的 RTX 5050 都快了约 10%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 23848 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 185883 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 46342 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21405 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8333 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏测试中,Nitro V14 AI 超越了 Victus 15,但落后于 Nitro V16。一般来说,RTX 5050 的性能足以在 1080p 下以较高甚至最高的细节运行大多数游戏。
在极端情况下,如优化极差的 边境之地 4等极端情况下,就需要借助升频和/或帧生成等功能。
以 1,920 x 1,080 分辨率启用 DLSS 质量并预设为 "高 "后,帧率从 29 fps 提高到 46 fps。启用 MFG 4x 理论上可将帧频提高到 126 帧/秒,但主观感觉帧频并不高。
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 171.4 | 163.6 | 103.4 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 147.9 | 139.7 | 130.7 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 95.7 | 80.9 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 90.4 | 75 | 70 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 86.4 | 73.5 | 64.2 | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 71.9 | 58.2 | 41.4 | |
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 48.8 | 44.4 | 32.8 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 51 | 43 | 30 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 42.6 | 39.9 | 19.8 | |
| Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 47.1 | 41.5 | 40.8 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 35.2 | 28.7 | 17.1 | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 65 | 52.2 | 26.8 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 89.8 | 71.5 | 48.3 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 65.4 | 47.9 | 23.9 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 101 | 75 | 27 |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (39.9 - 111.8, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (39.9 - 48.2, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.8 - 61.9, n=16, last 2 years) | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (19.8 - 25, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average of class Gaming (52.2 - 65, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (52.2 - 60, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average of class Gaming (26.8 - 35.7, n=3, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (26.8 - 33.2, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
在与 赛博朋克 2077在 1080p 超高清下的长时间运行中,没有出现任何异常,帧率相当稳定。
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高帧频图
排放量
噪音排放
宏碁仍需改进风扇控制和冷却系统。在 "性能 "模式下,Nitro V14 AI 的风扇噪音在空闲时就已经很明显了,达到 28 分贝(A)至 35 分贝(A)。
在《赛博朋克 2077》中,风扇噪音在不佩戴耳机的情况下也清晰可闻,噪音高达 56 dB(A),令人不安。而所有竞争对手的噪音都较小(46 至 55 dB(A))。
在日常使用中,我们更推荐使用平衡模式,因为该模式几乎不会影响性能,但通常能确保大幅降低噪音水平。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 28 / 32 / 35 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 50 / 57 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT Ryzen AI 5 340, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 11% | 12% | -17% | 15% | 11% | 13% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 26 | 25 4% | 24 8% | 25 4% | 25.5 2% | 24 8% | 23.7 9% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 28 | 25 11% | 28 -0% | 43 -54% | 25.5 9% | 25 11% | 23.7 15% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 32 | 30 6% | 29 9% | 45 -41% | 25.5 20% | 27 16% | 23.7 26% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 35 | 33 6% | 30 14% | 48 -37% | 26.9 23% | 29 17% | 27 23% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 50 | 38 24% | 40 20% | 53 -6% | 34.6 31% | 48 4% | 44.9 10% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 56 | 49 12% | 46 18% | 51 9% | 50.1 11% | 49 12% | 54.6 2% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 57 | 50 12% | 48 16% | 53 7% | 50.1 12% | 50 12% | 54.6 4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与许多笔记本电脑一样,机箱底部的发热量略高于顶部。
在压力测试中,我们测得顶部最高温度为 45 °C,底部最高温度为 51 °C,这是一个相当高的数值,尽管一些竞争对手的温度更高(见下表)。
在空闲状态下,整个机箱的温度仍低于 30 °C,这是值得称赞的。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24 °C / 75.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+4.9 °C / 8.8 F).
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT Ryzen AI 5 340, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -14% | -6% | -13% | -2% | -11% | -7% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 45 | 45 -0% | 43 4% | 49 -9% | 42.2 6% | 49 -9% | 47 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 51 | 59 -16% | 43 16% | 58 -14% | 51.7 -1% | 59 -16% | 49.6 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 26 | 29 -12% | 37 -42% | 32 -23% | 28.5 -10% | 28 -8% | 29.8 -15% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28 | 36 -29% | 28 -0% | 29 -4% | 29.2 -4% | 31 -11% | 30.7 -10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
发言人
根据我们的音频分析,Nitro V14 AI 的音质出人意料地优于 16 英寸的 Nitro,后者的主要问题在于低音较弱。
Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 29% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
总的来说,功耗很低,令人满意。Nitro V14 AI 的耗电量低于同类产品,尤其是在负载情况下。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT Ryzen AI 5 340, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -8% | -37% | -112% | -48% | -69% | -56% | -141% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 6.1 | 4.2 31% | 7.9 -30% | 20 -228% | 6.9 -13% | 10.6 -74% | 9.3 -52% | 13.6 ? -123% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.5 | 6.8 -5% | 9.2 -42% | 20.7 -218% | 10.7 -65% | 12.1 -86% | 11.1 -71% | 19.4 ? -198% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.5 | 9.8 -31% | 13.5 -80% | 22.7 -203% | 11.3 -51% | 15.9 -112% | 11.2 -49% | 25.9 ? -245% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 76 | 62 18% | 78 -3% | 71 7% | 69.7 8% | 95 -25% | 91.9 -21% | 110.4 ? -45% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 97.9 | 130.3 -33% | 128.4 -31% | 153.1 -56% | 162.6 -66% | 169 -73% | 171.5 -75% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 94.6 | 129.6 -37% | 126.7 -34% | 151.1 -60% | 165 -74% | 165 -74% | 168.6 -78% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 136 | 135 1% | 187 -38% | 172 -26% | 233.6 -72% | 192 -41% | 195 -43% | 261 ? -92% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量:赛博朋克 2077 / 压力测试
耗电量:外部显示器
电池寿命
如前所述,Nitro V14 AI 的电池续航能力令人印象深刻。在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下运行网页浏览脚本时,76 Whr 型号的电池可持续使用 13 个小时。
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT Ryzen AI 5 340, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) Ryzen AI 7 350, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 99.8 Wh | Razer Blade 14 2025 Ryzen AI 9 365, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 72 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -15% | -67% | -66% | -26% | -24% | -32% | -48% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 13.1 | 11.2 -15% | 4.3 -67% | 4.5 -66% | 9.7 -26% | 9.9 -24% | 8.9 -32% | 6.81 ? -48% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 9.99 ? | ||||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.435 ? | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 11.5 | 10.9 | 8.1 ? | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.9 |
Notebookcheck 对宏碁 Nitro V14 AI 的总体印象
在本次评测中,搭载 Ryzen AI 5 340 和GeForce RTX 5050 的宏碁 Nitro V14 AI 笔记本电脑成为一款经久不衰的 14 英寸游戏笔记本电脑,其性价比在大多数情况下都令人满意。但在风扇噪音方面还需要改进。
Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT
- 12/23/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
潜在替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1150 EUR | 1.7 kg | 21.9 mm | 14.50" 1920x1200 156 PPI IPS | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 AMD Ryzen 5 240 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,049.00 List Price: 1100 EUR | 2.4 kg | 24.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $555.00 HP Victus 15.6" FHD 144HZ Ga... 2. $660.00 HP Victus 15.6" 144Hz Full H... 3. $630.00 HP Victus 15.6 inch Laptop, ... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,499.00 Lenovo LOQ RTX 5060 Gaming L... 2. $1,299.00 Lenovo LOQ RTX 5050 Gaming L... 3. $1,049.99 Lenovo LOQ 15 AI Gaming Lapt... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,287.42 Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10 RTX ... 2. $43.69 Dentsing 80Wh L19C4PC1 L19M4... 3. $39.99 L20C4PC0 L20D4PC0 L20L4PC0 L... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED | |
| Schenker XMG Core 15 (M25) AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | List Price: 1840 EUR | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.30" 2560x1600 197 PPI IPS | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,067.90 Razer Blade 14 (2025) Gaming... 2. $2,099.99 Razer Blade 14 (2025) Gaming... 3. $1,799.99 Razer Blade 14 (2025) Gaming... List Price: 2399€ | 1.6 kg | 16.2 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.





























































