判决
Nitro V 15 目前的零售价略高于 1000 欧元。没有特别高期望值的买家可以买到一台有能力的游戏笔记本电脑,它可能达不到峰值性能水平,但除了显示色域有限之外,并没有任何重大失误。从机身开始,这款产品的机身盖采用了吸引人的纹理设计,还提供了体面的输入设备和包括雷电 4 在内的丰富端口选择。
由于内存(2x 8 GB DDR4)和固态硬盘(1 TB M.2)没有焊接,因此内存和存储都可以根据需要进行升级。遗憾的是,由于酷睿 i5-13420H 和 RTX 5050 在此配置下无法充分发挥潜能,游戏性能受到了一定影响。总体而言,这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑差一点就被评为 "良好"。
其他值得考虑的同价位、同性能笔记本电脑包括 微星 Cyborg 15以及 惠普 Victus 15和 联想 LOQ 15.
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
经过测试的宏碁 Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 可从多家在线零售商处购买,起价约为 1,050 欧元(例如,可从Notebooksbilliger 购买。).价格和供货情况可能因地区而异。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
宏碁使用的是全塑料机身,虽然有些地方有明显的弯曲,但大部分做工良好。铰链感觉有些松动,允许显示屏打开的最大角度约为 145°。这款笔记本电脑重 2.1 千克,在重量上与前代产品相当,整体设计保持相似,但并非完全不变。
连接性
除了没有读卡器外,端口的选择几乎无可挑剔。千兆 LAN 端口、HDMI 输出和 3.5 毫米音频插孔与三个 USB-A 端口和一个 Thunderbolt 4 接口相得益彰。此外,还配备了一个 Kensington 锁插槽。Wi-Fi 6E 模块的性能一般,网络摄像头的效果也同样平平。进入内部需要拧下 11 颗十字螺丝。内部图片见下文。
交流
网络摄像头

维护
输入设备
我们对键盘布局并不完全满意。值得批评的地方包括三栏数字键盘而不是完整的四栏布局,以及中央方向键相当小。打字体验是典型的橡胶圆顶键盘,因此并无特别出众之处。在背光方面也有改进的余地。即使在最高设置下,橙色背光也不是特别明亮。从好的方面看,这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑配备了一块 12.6 x 7.8 厘米的超大触摸板,不过点击时感觉有些粗糙。
显示屏
遗憾的是,即使到了 2026 年,有限的色彩覆盖范围仍然是更经济实惠的游戏笔记本电脑所面临的问题。与 Cyborg 15 和 Victus 15 类似,Nitro V 15 的 sRGB 值也徘徊在 70% 以下,导致图像相当苍白。对亮度的评价比较乐观。虽然 347 cd/m² 的平均亮度并不突出,但大多数竞争对手都低于这一数字。无论是 0.31 cd/m² 的黑阶还是 1,232:1 的对比度,其余数值都是 IPS 面板的典型值。可视角度也大致如此。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 382 cd/m²
Contrast: 1232:1 (Black: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.34 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
calibrated: 3.56
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
41.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
60.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
40.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.165
CCT: 7024 K
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 BOEhydis NE156FHM-NXA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 165 Hz | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S LG LP156WFJ-SPB4 (LGD0742), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | -1% | 8% | 66% | 117% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 40.3 | 40 -1% | 43 7% | 43.4 8% | 67.3 67% | 99.9 148% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 60.3 | 60 0% | 64.3 7% | 64.8 7% | 99.2 65% | 100 66% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 41.6 | 41.4 0% | 34.7 -17% | 44.9 8% | 69.1 66% | 98.3 136% |
| Response Times | -6% | 16% | 17% | 6% | 99% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 39 ? | 34.2 ? 12% | 28.6 ? 27% | 27.6 ? 29% | 33.9 ? 13% | 0.42 ? 99% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20.8 ? | 25.8 ? -24% | 20 ? 4% | 20 ? 4% | 21.2 ? -2% | 0.4 ? 98% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1152 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | |||||
| Screen | -23% | -6% | -2% | 31% | 50% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 382 | 292 -24% | 324 -15% | 286 -25% | 318 -17% | 492 29% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 347 | 263 -24% | 303 -13% | 272 -22% | 300 -14% | 495 43% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 86 | 80 -7% | 87 1% | 87 1% | 89 3% | 92 7% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.31 | 0.25 19% | 0.26 16% | 0.17 45% | 0.2 35% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1232 | 1168 -5% | 1246 1% | 1682 37% | 1590 29% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.34 | 7.15 -65% | 4.7 -8% | 4.61 -6% | 1.33 69% | 0.9 79% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.19 | 15.51 19% | 18.19 5% | 19.59 -2% | 4.42 77% | 1.8 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.56 | 4.13 -16% | 2.93 18% | 2.99 16% | 0.94 74% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 4.9 -104% | 3.9 -63% | 3.9 -63% | 1.9 21% | 1.2 50% |
| Gamma | 2.165 102% | 2.014 109% | 2.21 100% | 2.236 98% | 2.187 101% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 7024 93% | 7178 91% | 7541 86% | 6792 96% | 6678 97% | 6291 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-16% | 3% /
-2% | 8% /
3% | 34% /
35% | 89% /
77% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise | |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise | |
| ↘ 21.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8023 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Nitro V 15 属于中端产品,但某些方面的性能更倾向于入门级。愿意多花一点钱的买家还可以选择配备更快 CPU(酷睿 i7-13620H)的配置。酷睿 i7-13620H)或更强大的 GPU (GeForce RTX 5060 笔记本电脑 GPU).
| 模式 | 静音 | 平衡 | 性能 | 涡轮增压 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 33 dB(A) | 45 dB(A) | 52 dB(A) | 55 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧速率(FHD/超高清) | 45.1 帧 | 59 帧 | 61.3 帧 | 63 帧 |
| GPU 功耗 | ~50 W | ~60 W | ~70 W | ~75 W |
| CPU PL1 | 16 W | 45 W | 50 W | 55 W |
| CPU PL2 | 64 W | 115 W | 115 W | 115 W |
| Cinebench R15 多核分数 | 934 分 | 1769 分 | 1775 分 | 1782 分 |
处理器
安装的 酷睿 i5-13420H是英特尔新一代 Raptor Lake 处理器中一款不再特别新颖的型号。它具有四个性能核心(带超线程技术)和四个效率核心(不带超线程技术),最多可同时运行 12 个线程。
CPU 基准测试未发现异常。性能保持稳定,与其他配备 i5-13420H 的设备相当。基于 AMD 处理器的同类产品性能更高,如 Ryzen 7 250和 Ryzen 7 260.
Cinebench R15 多核耐久性测试
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (7922 - 12134, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 238426, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (40587 - 59715, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 9817, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (1724 - 2634, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (69803 - 74956, n=5) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (5485 - 6644, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 128721, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (19684 - 30163, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (35531 - 93100, n=5) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (509 - 746, n=5) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (4283 - 6627, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (12330 - 37044, n=5) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
系统性能
Nitro V 15 的整体系统性能并不突出,在同类产品中处于中等水平。只有内存性能有些令人失望。
PCMark 10: Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S -4! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (6845 - 10967, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (8618 - 8879, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (1366 - 1381, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (1386 - 1426, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (1343 - 1387, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (1249 - 1364, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (242 - 247, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (220 - 226, n=2) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (577 - 586, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=124, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (22003 - 59609, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (23499 - 68085, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (21429 - 62529, n=5) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (90.2 - 103.6, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S | |
* ... smaller is better
存储
遗憾的是,1 TB 金士顿固态硬盘在持续负载下性能会下降。不过,这个问题并不是 Nitro V 15 所独有的,包括联想 LOQ 15 在内的几款竞争对手也存在这个问题。
* ... smaller is better
持续读取性能:DiskSpd 读取循环(队列深度 8)
图形处理器性能
得益于其 75 瓦的最大 TGP,RTX 5050 GeForce RTX 5050的性能与该 GPU 之前的平均水平相当。不过,与前代产品 RTX 4050的差距仍然不大。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 21647 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 20647 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 8449 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
较老或要求不高的游戏一般都能以 1,920 x 1,080 的原始分辨率流畅运行,即使在最高设置下也是如此。不过,对于当前或要求较高的游戏,如果希望帧率超过 40 FPS,通常只能使用中高设置。如果需要,可以使用升频作为替代。
例如,将 DLSS 设置为 "质量 "模式、 直到黎明在超高预设下达到了 44 FPS,而不是 36 FPS。像往常一样,通过帧生成可以达到更高的帧率。
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (55.3 - 76.9, n=8) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 86.3 | 92.1 | 86.5 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 71.9 | 67.1 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 185 | 164.8 | 154.6 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 89.2 | 70.9 | 68.1 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 77.5 | 67.8 | 61.3 | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 53.3 | 47.6 | 36.4 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 81 | 68.7 | 49.2 |
| ARC Raiders | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Raytracing AA:TSR | |
| Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 79.8, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (43.5 - 49.2, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TSR | |
| Average of class Gaming (40.9 - 114.5, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (64.5 - 71.5, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
排放量
噪音排放
在负载情况下,宏碁 Nitro V 15 的噪音为 48 至 54 dB(A),略高于大多数竞争对手。当然,更敏感的用户可以选择不同的运行模式。在 赛博朋克 2077中,切换到平衡模式可将噪音从 52 dB(A) 降低到 45 dB(A),而不会牺牲太多性能。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 28 / 29 / 33 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 48 / 54 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 7% | 6% | -23% | 10% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 24 -0% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% | 25.5 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 28 | 25 11% | 28 -0% | 25 11% | 43 -54% | 25.5 9% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 29 | 29 -0% | 29 -0% | 28 3% | 45 -55% | 25.5 12% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 33 | 30 9% | 30 9% | 33 -0% | 48 -45% | 26.9 18% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 48 | 49 -2% | 40 17% | 44 8% | 53 -10% | 34.6 28% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 52 | 46 12% | 45 13% | 51 2% | 50.1 4% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 54 | 51 6% | 48 11% | 50 7% | 53 2% | 50.1 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 49 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度符合 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑的预期。在闲置状态下,机箱依然凉爽宜人。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.8 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | -2% | -12% | -9% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 46 | 46 -0% | 43 7% | 46 -0% | 49 -7% | 42.2 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 49 | 48 2% | 43 12% | 45 8% | 58 -18% | 51.7 -6% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 28 | 27 4% | 37 -32% | 36 -29% | 32 -14% | 28.5 -2% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30 | 28 7% | 28 7% | 38 -27% | 29 3% | 29.2 3% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
扬声器
音质属于中档。与大多数笔记本电脑一样,低音尤其有待改进。
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能耗
空闲模式下的平均耗电量为 18 瓦,可以更低。在负载情况下,15 英寸机型的耗电量在 66 瓦至 119 瓦之间,因此随附的 135 瓦电源并没有过度消耗。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 26% | 2% | 4% | -28% | -10% | -41% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 16.8 | 7 58% | 7.9 53% | 14.9 11% | 20 -19% | 6.9 59% | 13.7 ? 18% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 17.6 | 8 55% | 9.2 48% | 16.3 7% | 20.7 -18% | 10.7 39% | 19.5 ? -11% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 19.8 | 11 44% | 13.5 32% | 22.2 -12% | 22.7 -15% | 11.3 43% | 25.6 ? -29% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 66 | 76 -15% | 78 -18% | 72 -9% | 71 -8% | 69.7 -6% | 110.3 ? -67% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 106.5 | 128.4 -21% | 90.3 15% | 153.1 -44% | 162.6 -53% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 105 | 126.7 -21% | 89.6 15% | 151.1 -44% | 165 -57% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 119 | 136 -14% | 187 -57% | 117 2% | 172 -45% | 233.6 -96% | 257 ? -116% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 98.2 |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
带外部监控器的能耗
电池寿命
虽然电池容量从 57 Wh 大幅增至 76 Wh,但电池续航时间却不如前代产品。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,亮度降低到 150 cd/m²,设备的续航时间仅为 5.5 小时左右,与同类产品相比尚可接受。
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 57 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 55.2 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 71% | -22% | -2% | -18% | 76% | 22% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.5 | 9.4 71% | 4.3 -22% | 5.4 -2% | 4.5 -18% | 9.7 76% | 6.7 ? 22% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 21.5 | 6.9 | 9.23 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.472 ? | |||
| H.264 (h) | 11.5 | 7.93 ? | |||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.9 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
凭借更宽广的色域,Nitro V 15 可以与 联想 LOQ 15.但就目前而言,它只达到了 惠普 Victus 15和 微星 Cyborg 15这两款产品的价格相近,都在 1000 欧元左右,但整体性能略胜一筹。
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2
- 01/29/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
可能的替代品一览
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1049 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-51-582S Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Deal4GO CPU & GPU Graphics C... 2. Deal4GO CPU Cooling Fan 23.Q... 3. Deal4GO GPU Graphics Cooling... List Price: 900 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. HP Victus 15.6" 144Hz Full H... 2. HP Victus 15.6 inch Laptop, ... 3. HP Victus 15.6" FHD 144HZ Ga... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. msi Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG-257US ... 2. msi Cyborg 15 B2RW Cyborg 15... 3. EXCaliberPC [2025] MSI Cybor... List Price: 1099 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.2 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Lenovo LOQ 15 AI Gaming Lapt... 2. Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 20... 3. Lenovo LOQ RTX 5060 Gaming L... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. GBOLE 15.6" Replacement for ... 2. ASODI 80Wh L19C4PC1 L19M4PC1... 3. L20C4PC1 Laptop Battery Repl... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.




























































