结论电池续航时间长，整体性能稳定，性价比高
如果忽略显示屏上的成本削减措施，尤其是色彩空间方面的成本削减措施（不幸的是，这种情况在这个价位的产品中仍然经常出现），宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI 会给人留下非常好的印象。
目前，购买者只需花费约 1100 欧元（约合人民币 989 元），不仅可以获得双通道 16 GB DDR5 内存和 1 TB SSD，还可以获得 AMD Ryzen 5 240 处理器和配备 8 GB GDDR7 VRAM 的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 5050 笔记本电脑。
虽然机身没有采用任何金属材质，但其时尚的设计和良好的连接性（包括 USB4）给人留下了深刻印象。键盘和触摸板输入也很好。
宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI 的电池续航时间非常出色，超过 11 小时的 150 尼特 Wi-Fi 上网时间值得尊敬。
与此同时，这款笔记本电脑的排放和音质却不尽如人意。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI 的竞争对手包括其他采用 Blackwell 芯片的游戏笔记本电脑，价格在 1,000 欧元至 1,500 欧元之间，如 惠普 Victus 15和 Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1(都采用了 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑 GPU）和 联想 LOQ 15(RTX 5060 笔记本图形处理器).
上一代 尼特罗 V 16配备了 GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑 GPU也作为对比设备出现在表格中。
规格
底盘
机箱的构造与典型的中端游戏笔记本电脑类似。塑料表面提供了合理的稳定性，整体制作精良。
约 145° 的最大开启角度高于同级产品。键盘的灯光为橙色，与按键上的字母颜色相匹配。
这款 16 英寸笔记本电脑重 2.4 千克，与其前代产品以及惠普和联想的 15 英寸竞争产品一样重。与此同时，更大的 Scout 17 E1 重量稍重一些，为 2.7 千克。
设备
接口
与最近测试的 Victus 15 相比，Nitro V 16 AI 的连接性更好。除了一个读卡器（这在这个细分市场中并不是什么大问题）之外，宏碁还为这款笔记本配备了四个 USB 端口，其中 Type-C 端口支持当前的 USB4 标准。
音频接口、HDMI 2.1 输出、千兆 LAN 端口和 Kensington 锁开口使整套配置更加完美。
SD 卡阅读器
遗憾的是，内置 micro-SD 读卡器的读取速度较慢，仅为 30 到 40 MB/s。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (20 - 210, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 261, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
交流
联发科技的 Wi-Fi 6E 模块（RZ616）性能良好，尤其是在接收测试中。不过，传输功率可能会更好。
网络摄像头
高清网络摄像头只提供了大多数游戏笔记本电脑所特有的（糟糕的）基本功能。不出所料，色彩准确度和图像清晰度还有待提高。
配件
Nitro V 16 AI 随附几本信息手册和一个相当紧凑的 135 W 电源装置。
维护
总共需要拧松 10 颗十字螺丝才能进入内部。在引擎盖下，除了带有两个风扇的冷却系统外，还有无线模块、电池、两个 SO-DIMM 和两个 M.2 插槽。
可持续性
宏碁在包装上使用了一些塑料元素。
保修
宏碁在德国为 Nitro V 16 AI 提供 24 个月的保修服务。
输入设备
键盘
键盘是经典的橡胶圆顶键盘，其点击手感本应更加清脆。宏碁决定安装一个完整的数字键盘。
全尺寸方向键的出现令人印象深刻。虽然我们希望有一个独立的电源键，但在我们看来，键盘布局还是相当不错的。
键盘上方的特殊按键可以切换操作模式（稍后详述）。
触摸板
Nitro V 16 AI 的触摸板尺寸为 12.6 x 8.3 厘米，对于一款 16 英寸的设备来说，大小绰绰有余。触摸板的一个优点是，与 Victus 15 等设备相比，点击区域听起来不那么摇晃。
此外，鼠标替代品在精度和滑动性能等方面的表现也很一般。
显示屏
16 英寸显示屏支持 180 Hz 刷新率，格式为 16:10，最大分辨率为 1,920 x 1,200 像素。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 384 cd/m²
Contrast: 1067:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 5.82 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 3.95
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 5.4 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
40.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
58.2% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
39.2% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.174
CCT: 6067 K
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 B160UAN08.3 (AUO2CB8), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 180 Hz | Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT AUO B160UAN05.B (AUOD8B1), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 165 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -2% | 2% | -4% | 71% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 39.2 | 38.3 -2% | 43 10% | 37.7 -4% | 67.3 72% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 58.2 | 57.4 -1% | 64.3 10% | 56.3 -3% | 99.2 70% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 40.5 | 39.6 -2% | 34.7 -14% | 39 -4% | 69.1 71% |
| Response Times | -147% | -159% | -94% | -189% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 11.6 ? | 26.5 ? -128% | 28.6 ? -147% | 21.4 ? -84% | 33.9 ? -192% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 7.4 ? | 19.6 ? -165% | 20 ? -170% | 15 ? -103% | 21.2 ? -186% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | -2% | 10% | 6% | 39% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 384 | 303 -21% | 324 -16% | 279 -27% | 318 -17% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 372 | 305 -18% | 303 -19% | 260 -30% | 300 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 92 | 93 1% | 87 -5% | 90 -2% | 89 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.36 | 0.32 11% | 0.26 28% | 0.24 33% | 0.2 44% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1067 | 947 -11% | 1246 17% | 1163 9% | 1590 49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.82 | 5.74 1% | 4.7 19% | 4.97 15% | 1.33 77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.34 | 22.69 -12% | 18.19 11% | 20.52 -1% | 4.42 78% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.95 | 3.78 4% | 2.93 26% | 4.58 -16% | 0.94 76% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.4 | 4 26% | 3.9 28% | 1.7 69% | 1.9 65% |
| Gamma | 2.174 101% | 2.372 93% | 2.21 100% | 2.201 100% | 2.187 101% |
| CCT | 6067 107% | 7461 87% | 7541 86% | 6937 94% | 6678 97% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -50% /
-23% | -49% /
-16% | -31% /
-11% | -26% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
虽然色彩空间仅为中场，sRGB 色域覆盖率不到 60%，但响应时间却在竞争中脱颖而出。
在亮度方面，Nitro V 16 AI 也占据了对比领域的榜首位置，不过平均 370 cd/m² 的亮度也并非最高值，因为在较亮的环境中可视性会比较困难。
可视角度、对比度（约 1,070:1）和黑电平（0.36 cd/m²）均在 IPS 面板的常规范围内。
除了色彩空间覆盖范围小之外，色彩精确度也略显薄弱。面板在交付状态下会偏色，幸好可以通过校准来减少偏色。我们的测试设备还不得不面对明显的屏幕出血现象，尤其是在角落。
我们校准过的 ICC 配置文件链接在右侧亮度分布图旁边。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 7.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 3.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 11.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
就内部硬件而言，宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI 显然是一款中端设备。虽然不能更换 CPU 和 GPU（这并不奇怪），但如果需要，可以升级内存和固态硬盘容量。
测试条件
宏碁为 Nitro V 16 AI 提供了四种运行模式，这四种模式不仅在 GPU 性能方面存在差异，而且在 CPU 性能方面也存在差异。
我们使用 "性能 "模式进行测量，只有电池测试是在 "平衡 "模式下进行的。
| 模式 | 静音 | 平衡 | 性能 | 涡轮增压 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》噪音 | 34 dB(A) | 42 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) | 56 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧速率（FHD/超高清） | 66.6 fps | 73.6 fps | 75.2 fps | 76.4 fps |
| 赛博朋克 2077》GPU 功耗 | ~50 W | ~70 W | ~80 W | ~85 W |
| CPU PL1 | 45 W | 45 W | 54 W | 54 W |
| CPU PL2 | 45 W | 60 W | 65 W | 65 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 1961 分 | 2005 分 | 2060 分 | 2070 分 |
处理器
......（英文 AMD Ryzen 5 240是一款从技术上讲已不再是全新的处理器，但仍基于 Zen 4 架构。由于采用了 SMT 技术，它的六个内核可以并行处理多达 12 个线程。
在基准测试中，AMD 芯片领先于 英特尔酷睿 5 210H在 Erazer Scout 17 E1 和 酷睿 i5-13420H和惠普 Victus 15 的酷睿 i5-13420H，但落后于 Ryzen 7 250的 Ryzen 7 250 和联想 LOQ 15 的 Ryzen 7 8845HS和老款 Nitro 型号的 Ryzen 7 8845HS。
在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中，持续的多核性能表现值得肯定。
Cinebench R15 多核环路
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
系统性能
在系统测试中，宏碁游戏笔记本电脑位于对比设备的中场。这款笔记本在日常使用中的性能达到了预期水平。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT -4! | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 -4! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Gaming (8840 - 12600, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=116, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=116, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=116, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=116, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=120, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=116, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=130, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 6901 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 240 (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
测得的 DPC 延迟其实并不理想。与许多其他笔记本电脑类似，LatencyMon 工具也能获得相当高的延迟值。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
西部数据的 1 TB SSD 既不慢，也不特别快。根据我们的磁盘循环测试，在长时间使用时确实会出现节流现象，但速度下降并不剧烈。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
与 Erazer Scout 17 E1 相反，宏碁并没有运行最大 TGP 为 115 W 的 RTX 5050，而是将自己限制在 95 W（包括动态升压），这仍然超过了惠普 Victus 15 的 80 W。
在 GPU 基准测试中，Nitro V 16 AI 相应地介于这两款设备之间，尽管差异 - 至少在 3DMark 测试中 - 是相当可控的，而且前代产品的 RTX 4060 仍然可以很好地跟上。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 26964 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 46692 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23413 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9457 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
在游戏中，Nitro V 16 的 RTX 5050 性能略高于之前确定的该显卡的平均水平，与 Erazer Scout 17 E1 大致相当。
从本质上讲，RTX 5050 的速度足以运行当前的许多游戏，至少在全高清设置下或在原生分辨率下具有较高至最高的细节。
对于要求极高或优化不佳的游戏，情况会变得尤为紧张，例如 边陲 4, 夺宝奇兵和 星球大战逃犯.
如果需要更高的帧频，像往常一样升频也会有所帮助。在 战地 6为例，使用 DLSS 画质时，帧速率从 56 帧/秒提高到 70 帧/秒（1,920 x 1,080 像素，超杀预设）。
将多帧生成提高到 4 倍后，帧数增加到 189，但游戏主观感觉并不流畅。
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (71 - 76.9, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (88.1 - 117.6, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 171.6 | 165.7 | 112.9 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 148.9 | 141.7 | 133 | |||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 132.4 | 100.4 | ||||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 93 | 78 | ||||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 273 | 220 | 189.7 | |||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 101.1 | 86.9 | 80.7 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 97.5 | 83.4 | 75.2 | |||
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 74.1 | 67.7 | 52.5 | |||
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 46.4 | 40.4 | 32.8 | |||
| Until Dawn (2024) | 79.9 | 55.8 | 41.5 | |||
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 58.6 | 22.2 | ||||
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 32 | 28 | 21 | |||
| Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 53.7 | 48.8 | 47.3 | |||
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 38.6 | 30 | 16.5 | |||
| Battlefield 6 (2025) | 93.4 | 78.3 | 55.7 | |||
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 83.5 | 77.3 | 60 | 33.2 | 32.8 | 21.5 |
| Battlefield 6 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics Quality AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (73.6 - 159.9, n=4, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (73.6 - 78.3, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| 1920x1080 Overkill Graphics Quality AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (53.9 - 159.4, n=6, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (53.9 - 55.7, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Borderlands 4 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX | |
| Average of class Gaming (28.7 - 76.6, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (29.6 - 30, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| 1920x1080 Badass Preset AA:FX | |
| Average of class Gaming (16 - 54, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (16 - 16.5, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
除了 CPU 性能外，GPU 性能也保持了令人愉悦的稳定。 赛博朋克 2077证明了这一点。
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高帧频图
排放量
噪音排放
Nitro V 16 AI 的平均声压级 (SPL) 为 49 dB(A)，在性能模式下玩游戏时风扇的声音相当明显，但一些竞争对手的风扇在负载情况下声音更大，包括 Nitro V 16 的前身。
风扇偶尔会在空闲状态下转动，但除此之外，笔记本电脑总体上是静音的。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25 / 30 / 33 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 38 / 50 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT R7 8845HS, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -8% | 1% | -7% | -31% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25 | 25 -0% | 24 4% | 24 4% | 25 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25 | 25 -0% | 28 -12% | 27 -8% | 43 -72% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 30 | 28 7% | 29 3% | 29 3% | 45 -50% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 33 | 37 -12% | 30 9% | 32 3% | 48 -45% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 38 | 51 -34% | 40 -5% | 47 -24% | 53 -39% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 49 | 54 -10% | 46 6% | 55 -12% | 51 -4% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 50 | 52 -4% | 48 4% | 58 -16% | 53 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在表面温度方面，Nitro V 16 可以做得更好。机箱底部的最高温度为 59 °C，这对于配备中端组件的设备来说相当高，不适合在膝上进行游戏。
空闲时，机箱大部分区域的温度仍低于 30 °C，因此相当凉爽。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 59 °C / 138 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.8 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT R7 8845HS, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 3% | 6% | 8% | 1% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 45 | 41 9% | 43 4% | 42 7% | 49 -9% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 59 | 49 17% | 43 27% | 45 24% | 58 2% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 29 | 32 -10% | 37 -28% | 30 -3% | 32 -10% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 36 | 37 -3% | 28 22% | 35 3% | 29 19% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，CPU 在一段时间后的温度略高于 70 °C，而 GPU 则略高于 80 °C。
扬声器
与上一代产品相比，音质并没有改善。与大多数笔记本电脑一样，新款 Nitro V 16 也存在低音响应较弱的问题。
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
Nitro V 16 AI 的低功耗是一大亮点。在闲置模式下，这款笔记本的功耗仅为 4.2 到 9.8 W，比所有竞争对手都要经济。
在游戏模式下，提供的 135 W 电源会被大量使用并相应发热。
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.7 Watt |
| Idle | 4.2 / 6.8 / 9.8 Watt |
| Load |
62 / 135 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT R7 8845HS, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -25% | -32% | -89% | -113% | -154% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 4.2 | 9 -114% | 7.9 -88% | 13.5 -221% | 20 -376% | 13.9 ? -231% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.8 | 10 -47% | 9.2 -35% | 14.8 -118% | 20.7 -204% | 19.9 ? -193% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 9.8 | 13 -33% | 13.5 -38% | 22.9 -134% | 22.7 -132% | 26.9 ? -174% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 62 | 61 2% | 78 -26% | 87 -40% | 71 -15% | 111.6 ? -80% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 129.6 | 116.3 10% | 126.7 2% | 171.9 -33% | 151.1 -17% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 130.3 | 118.9 9% | 128.4 1% | 173.4 -33% | 153.1 -17% | |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 135 | 134 1% | 187 -39% | 195 -44% | 172 -27% | 262 ? -94% |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量：赛博朋克 2077 / 压力测试
耗电量：外部显示器
电池寿命
Nitro V 16 AI 的电池续航时间不仅超过了前代产品（因为宏碁将电池容量从 57 Wh 提高到了 76 Wh），也超过了所有竞争对手。
在 150 尼特的标准 Wi-Fi 测试中，它的续航时间略高于 11 小时，这对于一款游戏笔记本来说是非常超值的。
| Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 R5 240, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT R7 8845HS, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 57 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 53 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | -47% | -62% | -65% | -60% | -41% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 11.2 | 5.9 -47% | 4.3 -62% | 3.9 -65% | 4.5 -60% | 6.56 ? -41% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 9.79 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.42 ? |
Notebookcheck 对宏碁 Nitro V 16 AI 的总体印象
通过 Nitro V 16 AI，宏碁成功地销售了一款中端游戏笔记本电脑，它旨在以出人意料的超长电池续航时间吸引潜在买家。
Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860
- 10/29/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 77.5%  | Acer Nitro V 16 AI ANV16-42-R860 AMD Ryzen 5 240 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $989.00 List Price: 1100 EUR | 2.4 kg | 24.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
2. 76.3%  | Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1100 EUR | 2.5 kg | 25.5 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
3. 75.8%  | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $659.00 HP Victus 15 Gaming Laptop 1... 2. $879.00 HP Victus 15 Intel i5-13420H... 3. $1,019.99 HP Victus 15.6" FHD IPS 144H... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
4. 76.8%  | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | List Price: 1250 EUR | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
5. 77.5%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,199.00 Lenovo LOQ RTX 5050 Gaming L... 2. $1,469.00 Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15... 3. $29.99 New 245W 230W AC Adapter Cha... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
