结论 - 经济实惠，但存在缺陷
目前，评测机型 Victus 15-fa2160ng 的售价约为 1200 美元，在竞争激烈的市场中并不占尽优势。与其他 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑相比，它的价格值得称赞，属于低端产品。不过，价格相近的还有联想 LOQ Essential 15，根据规格表，它的目标是以更好的显示效果（100% sRGB）让用户眼前一亮。与联想的竞争对手不同，Victus 15 安装的全高清 IPS 面板不得不忍受较差的色域，这使得内容显得比较暗淡。更糟糕的是，首批 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑的售价已经相对较高，其中一些（取决于应用）还能提供不错的性能提升，即便不是惊天动地。
基本上，买家会知道在 1000 美元的价位上应该期待什么。塑料外壳和扬声器质量一般，电池容量和连接性（无 USB 4）也是如此。不过，升级选项还是相当不错的。除了两个 M.2 插槽外，15 英寸机型还包括两个 SO-DIMM 组。负载情况下的噪音和温度产生情况也优于一些同类设备。
Pros
+ 性能稳定
+ 两个内存和两个固态硬盘插槽
+ 适度排放
Cons
- CPU 略显过时
- 色彩空间有限
- 没有读卡器
价格和供应情况
惠普 Victus 15-fa2160ng 可以在各种网上商店购买，起价约为 1200 美元。
规格
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng (Victus 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-13420H 8 x 1.5 - 4.6 GHz, 90 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2212 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 80 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 581.57, Optimus
Memory
24 GB
, SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (one empty)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN1560, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, 512 GB
, NVMe-SSD, two M.2 2280 slots (one empty)
Weight
2.356 kg, Power Supply: 660 g
Price
1000 EUR
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
你不应该对外壳的质量抱有特别高的期望。15 英寸设备的表面完全由塑料制成，容易发出嘎嘎的响声。不过，这款评测设备的制造质量无可挑剔，所有元素都完美地融合在一起。显示屏的最大开角约为 135°，既不小也不特别大。
Victus 15 的重量为 2.4 千克，与 15 英寸和 16 英寸的同类产品基本一致，不过 17 英寸的 Erazer Scout 比它重了不到 0.3 千克。惠普笔记本电脑近 2.4 厘米的高度（不含机脚）也并不出众。
特点
接口
连接性略显不足。买家不仅没有现代的 USB 协议，也没有读卡器。不过，端口分布设计得相当合理，因为它们位于侧面的后部，因此在使用鼠标时几乎不会受到干扰。
交流
安装的 Realtek Wi-Fi 模块（RTL8852BE）比上一代产品中的联发科芯片快一些，但仍无法达到真正的高速。在我们的测试对比中，只有 Erazer Scout 的性能给我们留下了深刻印象。
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø820 (780-855)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø713 (682-751)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1282 (579-1471)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (788-855)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø943 (903-985)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø962 (944-972)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø729 (716-738)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1617 (985-1684)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (908-952)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (438-961)
网络摄像头
与大多数笔记本电脑一样，网络摄像头的质量最好还是不说。色彩准确度和图像清晰度也有很多不足之处。
12.7 ∆E
15 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
0.6 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
2 ∆E
配件
笔记本电脑附带了一些信息手册和一个 200 瓦的电源。
维护
底板由七颗小十字螺丝和几个挂钩固定，其中有些挂钩非常紧。在引擎盖下，您可以接触到每个部件（见照片）。
可持续性
遗憾的是，惠普仍在使用各种塑料薄膜作为包装材料。
保修
德国的保修期为 12 个月。
输入设备
键盘
输入设备相对较好，但并不令人热衷。键盘使用了整个机身的宽度，配备了全尺寸数字键盘和白色单层背光。我们认为键盘的布局有点混乱，尤其是右上角的电源按钮、"插入"、"打印屏幕 "和 "删除 "键的位置。有些用户可能还希望能有更大的箭头。
触摸板
触摸板性能稳定。它的表面尺寸为 12.5 x 8 厘米，具有稳固的滑动特性，而且反应灵敏。不过，与其他许多笔记本电脑一样，点击表面容易发出响声。
显示屏
遗憾的是，Victus 15 的显示效果并不鲜艳。与一些竞争对手不同的是，144 Hz 面板显示效果较弱，尤其是在色彩覆盖方面。虽然 64% sRGB 比上一代产品略好，但仍然令人失望。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMN1560 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 324 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 303.1 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 324 cd/m²
Contrast: 1246:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}
calibrated: 2.93
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
34.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
64.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
43% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
CCT: 7541 K
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng BOE094D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AUODBB2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 144 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | -4% | 70% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 43 | 39.2 -9% | 37.7 -12% | 67.3 57% | 40 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 64.3 | 57.9 -10% | 56.3 -12% | 99.2 54% | 58.1 -10% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 34.7 | 40.5 17% | 39 12% | 69.1 99% | 38.7 12% |
| Response Times | 18% | 25% | -13% | 3% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 28.6 ? | 23.8 ? 17% | 21.4 ? 25% | 33.9 ? -19% | 27.6 ? 3% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20 ? | 16.3 ? 18% | 15 ? 25% | 21.2 ? -6% | 19.4 ? 3% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | |||||
| Screen | -10% | -5% | 35% | 2% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 324 | 273 -16% | 279 -14% | 318 -2% | 328 1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 303 | 249 -18% | 260 -14% | 300 -1% | 313 3% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 84 -3% | 90 3% | 89 2% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.26 | 0.28 -8% | 0.24 8% | 0.2 23% | 0.26 -0% |
| Contrast (:1) | 1246 | 975 -22% | 1163 -7% | 1590 28% | 1262 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.7 | 5.19 -10% | 4.97 -6% | 1.33 72% | 4.73 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.19 | 21.16 -16% | 20.52 -13% | 4.42 76% | 17.47 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.93 | 4.54 -55% | 4.58 -56% | 0.94 68% | 4.22 -44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 1.7 56% | 1.7 56% | 1.9 51% | 2.05 47% |
| Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.148 102% | 2.201 100% | 2.187 101% | 2.63 84% |
| CCT | 7541 86% | 6819 95% | 6937 94% | 6678 97% | 6718 97% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-4% | 5% /
-0% | 31% /
36% | 1% /
1% |
* ... smaller is better
在出厂状态下，由于面板具有较强的蓝色色调，因此通常色彩不准确，不过可以通过校准来纠正。
只要不将笔记本电脑拿到室外或阳光下暴晒，其他方面的表现都很出色。首先是 0.26 cd/m² 的黑度，加上约 300 cd/m² 的亮度，IPS 典型对比度超过 1,200:1。可视角度和响应时间也相当不错。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 37 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8167 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
虽然评测配置的 24 GB DDR5 内存相当可观，但 512 GB 的固态硬盘还可以再大一些。出于价格原因，惠普还使用了过时的处理器。
测试条件
Omen Gaming Hub 提供四种运行模式，我们的测试基于性能配置文件。
| 模式 | 静音 | 环保 | 标准 | 性能 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 35 dB(A) | 37 dB(A) | 41 dB(A) | 46 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清） | 38.7fps | 56.7fps | 67.3fps | 71fps |
| 赛博朋克 2077 GPU 功耗 | ~30 W | ~60 W | ~70 W | ~80 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 1,422 分 | 839 分 | 1,703 分 | 1,756 分 |
处理器
与此同时 酷睿 i5-13420H是几年前的产品，仍在使用过时的 10nm 工艺制造。Raptor Lake 型号包含四个性能内核（含超线程）和八个效率内核（不含超线程）。这样，总共可以同时处理 20 个线程。在基准测试中，Victus 15 的成绩垫底，尽管前代产品的 酷睿 i5-13500H和 酷睿 5 210HScout 17 E1 中的酷睿 5 210H 通常只能略微快一些。与此同时 Ryzen 7 250性能提高了 30% 以上，而 Ryzen 9 8940HX则提高了近 70%。
Cinebench R15 多重持续测试
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H: Ø1493 (1461.13-1737.69)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Intel Core i5-13500H: Ø1859 (1813.15-2238.76)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Core 5 210H: Ø1790 (1711.45-1850.05)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250: Ø2469 (2446.48-2543.88)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX: Ø4084 (4037.14-4295.53)
CPU Performance rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (7922 - 11106, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (40587 - 59715, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (1724 - 2634, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (69803 - 74956, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (5485 - 6625, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (19684 - 27607, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (35531 - 93100, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (509 - 744, n=4) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (4283 - 5831, n=4) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (12330 - 37044, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
系统性能
系统性能有时会受到固态硬盘较弱的影响（稍后详述）。与同类设备相比，应用程序的启动或加载时间有时会稍长一些。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 -4! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng -5! | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Average of class Gaming (8840 - 12600, n=123, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=119, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=117, last 2 years) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=127, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 5828 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 104987, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (22003 - 59609, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (23759 - 68085, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (21429 - 62529, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-13420H (90.2 - 103.6, n=4) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
延迟也不尽如人意。LatencyMon 工具发现了某些应用程序的潜在问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| HP Victus 15-fa1057ng | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
如前所述，固态硬盘并不是速度最快的型号。它在顺序测试中取得了不错的成绩，在循环测试中也没有出现问题。在这方面，大多数竞争对手仍然遥遥领先，甚至是它的前代产品。
Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
4987 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2844 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
461.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
443.8 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2146 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2757 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
61.31 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
150.9 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
持续读取性能：DiskSpd 循环读取，队列深度 8
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4980 (2883.06-5021.63)
HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3764 (3113.91-6375.34)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Phison C-E80T001T2-P03D54E27T; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5817 (5172.14-5840.63)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5490 (1238.79-7073.06)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7228 (5964.95-7269.15)
图形处理器性能
惠普选择为显卡使用有限的 TGP。Scout 17 E1 的 RTX 5050 最大功率为 115 瓦，而 Victus 15 的最大功率仅为 80 瓦，这一点从测量结果中可以明显看出。Medion 的竞争对手在 3DMark 测试中提高了几个百分点，尽管前代产品的 RTX 4050 落后了约 15%。与此同时，RTX 5060 实现了 18% 至 27% 的提升。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 25519 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 50444 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 22488 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9098 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (71 - 76.9, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (37.2 - 246, n=107, last 2 years) | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (80.4 - 86.3, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (88.1 - 117.6, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 215, n=141, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (86.2 - 102, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 456, n=129, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (173.4 - 189.7, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| HP Omen 16-ap0091ng | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (116.2 - 119.9, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 155.1 | 132.2 | 88.1 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 126.2 | 121.7 | 116.2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 105.2 | 86.2 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 76.2 | 65.5 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 234 | 192.2 | 173.4 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 96.9 | 82.4 | 80.4 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 92 | 78.8 | 71 | |
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 72.3 | 54.7 | 53.8 | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 47.4 | 33.9 | ||
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 54.8 | 54.3 | 52.8 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 42 | 38.9 | 33.8 | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 83.2 | 67.6 | 46.8 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 48.3 | 45.1 | 22.9 | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 96 | 93 | 18 | |
| Borderlands 4 (2025) | 35.7 | 29.6 | 16 | |
| Battlefield 6 (2025) | 87.7 | 73.6 | 53.9 |
Performance rating | The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered | Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 | Stalker 2 | Space Marine 2 | Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 | Horizon Forbidden West
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (22.9 - 61.9, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (22.9 - 25, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (46.8 - 130.3, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (46.8 - 51.6, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Space Marine 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (52.8 - 108, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (52.8 - 70.8, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 - 1920x1080 High Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.9 - 86.1, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (33.9 - 35.1, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Horizon Forbidden West - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (14.7 - 140.3, n=21, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (53.8 - 62, n=2) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
长期测试的一个积极方面是 赛博朋克 2077的一个积极方面是没有出现任何与节流或类似情况有关的异常。
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop: Ø65.9 (61.8-66.6)
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop: Ø69.1 (66.5-69.6)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø80 (76.1-80.8)
HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop: Ø78.2 (74.1-78.9)
排放量
噪音排放
在基于 3D 的操作中，Victus 15 比竞争对手更安静，尽管在《赛博朋克 2077》中记录的平均噪音水平为 46 dB(A)，但这绝不是安静。与前代产品相比，负载情况下的噪音水平似乎没有增加。当笔记本电脑处于非活动状态时，风扇仍在性能模式下持续工作，噪音略低于 30 dB(A)。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 28 / 29 / 30 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 40 / 48 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -9% | -32% | 1% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 25 -4% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% | 23 4% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 28 | 29 -4% | 27 4% | 43 -54% | 23 18% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 29 | 30 -3% | 29 -0% | 45 -55% | 23 21% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 30 | 31 -3% | 32 -7% | 48 -60% | 27.64 8% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 40 | 40 -0% | 47 -18% | 53 -33% | 49.5 -24% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46 | 55 -20% | 51 -11% | 49.5 -8% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 48 | 48 -0% | 58 -21% | 53 -10% | 52.73 -10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
机箱顶部和底部完全可以接受的 43°C 最高温度相当适中。在空闲模式下，大部分区域的温度都保持在 30°C 以下。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.3 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 13% | -2% | -10% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43 | 42 2% | 42 2% | 49 -14% | 36 16% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 43 | 42 2% | 45 -5% | 58 -35% | 37 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 37 | 24 35% | 30 19% | 32 14% | 30 19% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 28 | 24 14% | 35 -25% | 29 -4% | 32 -14% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，CPU 和 GPU 的温度分别为 74°C 和 77°C。
发言人
在音质方面，Victus 15 优于 Erazer Scout 17。但总体而言，音质仍只能说是中规中矩。通常情况下，低音尤为欠缺。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
由于限制了 TGP，15 英寸机型总体上比竞争对手更经济。空闲模式下的功率为 8 至 13 瓦，负载模式下的功率为 78 至 187 瓦，这对于所提供的性能而言是可以接受的。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.3 / 1.3 Watt |
| Idle | 7.9 / 9.2 / 13.5 Watt |
| Load |
78 / 187 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -2% | -41% | -52% | -28% | -75% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 7.9 | 5 37% | 13.5 -71% | 20 -153% | 7.8 1% | 14 ? -77% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 9.2 | 9 2% | 14.8 -61% | 20.7 -125% | 8.8 4% | 19.9 ? -116% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 13.5 | 22 -63% | 22.9 -70% | 22.7 -68% | 21.5 -59% | 26.8 ? -99% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 78 | 72 8% | 87 -12% | 71 9% | 119 -53% | 110.9 ? -42% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 128.4 | 173.4 -35% | 153.1 -19% | 192 -50% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 126.7 | 171.9 -36% | 151.1 -19% | 164.5 -30% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 187 | 176 6% | 195 -4% | 172 8% | 208 -11% | 261 ? -40% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 113 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø131.4 (125.3-135)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.2 (7.86-13.5)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø128.4 (124.2-135.8)
外接显示器的功耗
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø72.6 (64.4-96)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø96.2 (69.7-117.5)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø122.2 (115.4-134.2)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø16.6 (15.1-24.3)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø126.7 (113-133.1)
电池运行时间
运行时间测试使用平衡模式进行。有趣的是，尽管电池容量同为 70 Wh，但运行时间却明显不如前代产品。新版 Victus 15 的上网时间不是 7.5 小时左右，而是只有不到 4 小时，与 Scout 17 E1 和联想 LOQ 15 不相上下。
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng i5-13500H, GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 70 Wh | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 53 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng R9 8940HX, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 70 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 74% | -9% | 5% | 16% | 53% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 4.3 | 7.5 74% | 3.9 -9% | 4.5 5% | 5 16% | 6.58 ? 53% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 6.9 | 9.79 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 1.3 | 1.3 | 1.42 ? | |||
| H.264 (h) | 5.1 | 7.74 ? |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
由于RTX 5050和RTX 5060笔记本电脑的价格往往十分接近，目前千元级市场的情况十分火爆。在购买 Victus 15 之前，你应该知道，惠普之所以能实现这个适中的价格，是采取了包括显示屏在内的各种削减成本措施的结果。
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng
- 10/24/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 75.8%  | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $649.00 HP Victus 15 Gaming Laptop 1... 2. $885.00 HP Victus 15 Intel i5-13420H... 3. $899.00 HP Victus 15.6" FHD 144Hz Ga... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
2. 84% v7 (old)  | HP Victus 15-fa1057ng Intel Core i5-13500H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. 15.6" FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 144... 2. $12.00 RAKSTORE Laptop CPU Cooling ... 3. $129.99 WARWOLFTEAM New Screen Compa... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
3. 76.8%  | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | List Price: 1250 EUR | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
4. 77.5%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,569.00 Lenovo LOQ Gaming Laptop, 15... 2. $37.99 Ruilezyo 300W Laptop Charger... 3. $101.68 New KrystalPix LCD Display F... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
5. 82.5%  | HP Omen 16-ap0091ng AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $19.99 BestParts New CPU+GPU Coolin... 2. $16.99 Fleshy Leaf CPU+GPU Cooling ... 3. $35.99 Replacement Backlit Keyboard... List Price: 1500 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.7 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
