判决
如果您正在寻找一款与众不同的游戏笔记本，Cyborg 15 绝对是您的不二之选。虽然显示屏的盖子还相对不够引人注目，但底座顶部的花纹和透明元素非常引人注目。对比：2023 测试的 前代配备 RTX 4060 的前代产品在这里显得更加低调。遗憾的是，显示屏几乎没有任何变化。新版本还不得不使用较小的色彩空间，这更适合 400 欧元（约合人民币 472 元）的办公笔记本电脑。
显卡的功率也值得讨论：由于微星只为 RTX 5050 提供了微不足道的 45 瓦 TGP，GPU 性能未能发挥其潜力，正如我们将在文章中展示的那样，尽管噪音发展有限。其他设备都很稳定，但就价格而言并不奢华，包括酷睿 7 240H、16 GB DDR5 内存（2x 8 GB）和 512 GB 固态硬盘。同时，网络摄像头的隐私快门也是一个加分项，这对于游戏笔记本电脑来说并不特别。
Cyborg 15 的竞争对手包括其他 RTX 5050 和 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑，如 宏碁 Nitro V 15和 惠普 Victus 15和 联想 LOQ 15它们都处于类似的评级区域。如果你愿意多花一点钱，你应该阅读一下对联想 5 15 的测试。 联想Legion 5 15，它几乎获得了非常好的评价。
Pros
+ 有趣的设计
+ 排放适中
+ 隐私百叶窗
Cons
- GPU 能力有限
- 色彩空间小
- 无 Thunderbolt
- msi Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG-257US 15.6" Full HD 144Hz Gaming Laptop, Intel Core 7 240H 2.5GHz, 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 8GB, Windows 11 Home, Translucent Black
- msi Cyborg 15 B2RW Cyborg 15 B2RWFKG-421US 15.6" Gaming Notebook - Full HD - 144 Hz - Intel Core 7 240H - 32 GB - 1 TB SSD - Translucent Black
- MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG-258US 15.6" Full HD 144Hz Gaming Laptop, Intel Core 5 210H 2.2GHz, 16GB RAM, 1TB SSD, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 8GB, Windows 11 Home, Translucent Black
规格
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG (Cyborg 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core 7 240H, 6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core, 4 x 4.0 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core, 45 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1500 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 45 W TDP, GDDR7, ForceWare 591.74, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB DDR5-5600, two SO-DIMM slots (both in use)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, Full-HD, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G, 512 GB
, NVMe-SSD, one M.2 2280 slot (in use)
Weight
2.22 kg, Power Supply: 485 g
Price
1099 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
住房
外壳由金属（盖子）和塑料（底座）混合制成。在大多数情况下，做工和稳定性都无可挑剔。微星特别值得称赞的是 180° 的开合角度。Cyborg 15 的重量略低于 2.2 千克（约 4.9 磅），在重量介于 1.9 至 2.4 千克（约 4.2 至 5.3 磅）的同类产品中处于中等水平。要打开机箱，必须拧下 12 颗十字螺丝。您可以从下面的图片中了解它的内部结构。
设备
连接能力相当薄弱。虽然有一个千兆 LAN 端口，但没有读卡器。同时，我们也希望 USB 端口能采用更现代的标准；例如，Thunderbolt 就没有配备。无论如何，英特尔无线模块的速度令人满意，尤其是在接收数据时。与大多数笔记本电脑一样，网络摄像头在图像清晰度等方面还有待改进。
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=271) | |
| Average of class Gaming (469 - 1862, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average of class Gaming (680 - 1745, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=271) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1307 (1262-1367)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1606 (1267-1656)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6 MT7920 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø977 (945-1016)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø820 (780-855)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø823 (788-855)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1820 (1746-1921)
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1699 (1654-1735)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1679 (1634-1714)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6 MT7920 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø961 (942-971)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø962 (944-972)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Realtek RTL8852BE; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø934 (908-952)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 Mediatek Wi-Fi 7 MT7925 Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1698 (1622-1727)
网络摄像头
6.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
11 ∆E
9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
维护
输入设备
由于微星典型的特殊布局，键盘需要一定程度的熟悉。数字键盘只有三列而不是四列，这也需要一些时间来适应。我们可以用 "扎实 "来形容打字的感觉。玩家还可以期待相对强大的 RGB 灯光。触摸板的尺寸为 12 x 7.6 厘米（约合 4.7 x 3.0 英寸），对于 15 英寸设备来说绰绰有余。在测试中，鼠标替代品在精度、滑行特性和手势方面的表现都令人满意。
显示屏
正如开头提到的，全高清面板（144 Hz）的屏幕质量还有待提高。虽然 0.17 cd/m² 的低黑值使对比度相当可观（接近 1,700:1），但 270 cd/m² 左右的亮度并不令人印象深刻。由于色彩空间较小（仅为 65% sRGB），买家还不得不忍受相当苍白的画面印象。联想 LOQ 15 显示了在这一价格范围内如何可以做得更好，而其他方面，如响应时间和可视角度都很一般。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMN N156HRA-EA1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 288 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 271.6 cd/m² Minimum: 15 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 286 cd/m²
Contrast: 1682:1 (Black: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.61 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
calibrated: 2.99
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
44.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
64.8% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
43.4% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.236
CCT: 6792 K
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG CMN N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF AU Optronics B156HAN15.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 BOEhydis NE156FHM-NXA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 165 Hz | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng CMN1560, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -7% | -8% | 54% | 101% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 43.4 | 42.3 -3% | 40.3 -7% | 43 -1% | 67.3 55% | 99.9 130% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 64.8 | 62.6 -3% | 60.3 -7% | 64.3 -1% | 99.2 53% | 100 54% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 44.9 | 43.7 -3% | 41.6 -7% | 34.7 -23% | 69.1 54% | 98.3 119% |
| Response Times | 25% | -23% | -2% | -15% | 98% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 27.6 ? | 22 ? 20% | 39 ? -41% | 28.6 ? -4% | 33.9 ? -23% | 0.42 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 20 ? | 14 ? 30% | 20.8 ? -4% | 20 ? -0% | 21.2 ? -6% | 0.4 ? 98% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1152 ? | |||||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 11 | |||||
| Screen | -2% | -2% | -5% | 30% | 67% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 286 | 247 -14% | 382 34% | 324 13% | 318 11% | 492 72% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 272 | 234 -14% | 347 28% | 303 11% | 300 10% | 495 82% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 89 2% | 86 -1% | 87 0% | 89 2% | 92 6% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.17 | 0.25 -47% | 0.31 -82% | 0.26 -53% | 0.2 -18% | |
| Contrast (:1) | 1682 | 988 -41% | 1232 -27% | 1246 -26% | 1590 -5% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.61 | 3.78 18% | 4.34 6% | 4.7 -2% | 1.33 71% | 0.9 80% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.59 | 6.42 67% | 19.19 2% | 18.19 7% | 4.42 77% | 1.8 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.99 | 3.94 -32% | 3.56 -19% | 2.93 2% | 0.94 69% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.9 | 2.16 45% | 2.4 38% | 3.9 -0% | 1.9 51% | 1.2 69% |
| Gamma | 2.236 98% | 2.33 94% | 2.165 102% | 2.21 100% | 2.187 101% | 2.16 102% |
| CCT | 6792 96% | 6906 94% | 7024 93% | 7541 86% | 6678 97% | 6291 103% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
2% | -11% /
-6% | -5% /
-6% | 23% /
29% | 89% /
82% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 9.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8039 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
Cyborg 15 的性能处于中等水平。如果内存或大容量存储器用完，可以通过两个 SO-DIMM 组和一个 M.2-2280 插槽进行升级。
测试条件
预装的微星中心提供了从 ECO Silent 到 Extreme Performance 的各种用户场景。我们使用 AI 模式 "智能自动 "进行了测量（各配置文件之间的差异见下表）。
| 模式 | 智能自动 | 极致性能 | 平衡 | ECO静音 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 45 dB(A) | 48 dB(A) | 45 dB(A) | 37 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》帧率（FHD/超高清） | 55.3 帧 | 56.3 帧 | 55.2 帧 | 36.2 帧 |
| GPU 功耗 | ~40 W | ~45 W | ~40 W | ~35 W |
| CPU PL1 | 45 W | 45 W | 35 W | 15 W |
| CPU PL2 | 45 W | 45 W | 35 W | 15 W |
| Cinebench R15 多重得分 | 1913 分 | 1931 分 | 1669 分 | 731 分 |
处理器
安装了 酷睿 7 240H是 Raptor Lake 系列的 10 纳米型号，包含 6 个性能内核（含超线程）和 4 个效率内核（不含超线程），总共可实现 16 个并行线程。在 CPU 方面，该芯片位于 酷睿 i5-13420H或宏碁 Nitro V 15 的酷睿 i5-13420H 和 酷睿 i7-12650H之间。来自 AMD 的竞争正在拉开序幕，至少以 Ryzen 7 250(联想 LOQ 15）或 Ryzen 7 260(联想Legion 5 15）。
Cinebench R15 多耐久性测试
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Core 7 240H: Ø1654 (1417.03-1799.86)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1776 (1635.52-2155.04)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Intel Core i5-13420H: Ø1674 (1645.82-1778.57)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H: Ø1493 (1461.13-1737.69)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250: Ø2469 (2446.48-2543.88)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260: Ø2777 (2734.48-2831.06)
CPU Performance rating | Cinebench R23 | Cinebench R20 | Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
| CPU Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF -2! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Cinebench R23 | |
| Multi Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (5668 - 40970, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (10488 - 16588, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Single Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2267, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (1719 - 1905, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Cinebench R20 | |
| CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2179 - 16108, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (4535 - 6386, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Gaming (439 - 870, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (665 - 730, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (1537 - 6271, n=135, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (1800 - 2582, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 343, n=134, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (249 - 276, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (195 - 281, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (80 - 517, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (5340 - 22104, n=134, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (9713 - 13681, n=4) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3259, n=134, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (2394 - 2648, n=4) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 | |
| Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (4557 - 27010, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (8072 - 12276, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Single-Core | |
| Average of class Gaming (986 - 2474, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (1695 - 1862, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (7.7 - 44.3, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (12.7 - 19, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (51.2 - 72.4, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 88.8, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (0.4329 - 0.4853, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3439 - 0.759, n=134, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (11867 - 14710, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 238426, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (59260 - 73294, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 9817, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (2455 - 3036, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (75356 - 86602, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (7777 - 8803, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 128721, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (29381 - 35982, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 247074, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (50528 - 61850, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (725 - 895, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (6389 - 8056, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (21710 - 39806, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
系统性能
在系统性能方面，Cyborg 15 也处于中游水平。在日常使用中，电脑的响应速度非常快。
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (6662 - 16716, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7440 - 19351, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=115, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 345, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=124, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 108104, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (34965 - 63992, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (39706 - 71870, n=3) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (33560 - 60252, n=3) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core 7 240H (98.3 - 106.5, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
与通常情况一样，在延迟方面也有一些需要改进的地方。然而，许多笔记本电脑在此方面仍有不足，如表所示。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
512 GB 的存储容量在 2026 年显得有些微不足道。不过，西部数据的集成 NVMe 固态硬盘速度相对较快，在耐久性测试中的表现也相当稳定，这一点是所有竞争对手都无法比拟的。
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6133 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
206 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
532.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
424.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2901 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
144.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
78.22 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
168.4 MB/s
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
* ... smaller is better
连续读取性能DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPMSJ-512G; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6023 (4921.16-6071.9)
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB: Ø3610 (3316.15-3652.15)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø2776 (1715.89-4807.09)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4980 (2883.06-5021.63)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5490 (1238.79-7073.06)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6573 (6108.16-6593.26)
图形处理器性能
......（英文 GeForce RTX 5050标志着 Nvidia 进入移动游戏领域。虽然 Blackwell 芯片在其他设备中的指定 TGP 功率高达 100 瓦，但 Cyborg 15 的最大功率仅为 45 瓦，这是一个相当低的数值。因此，15 英寸处理器在 GPU 方面仅落后于 RTX 5050 同级产品不到 20%，甚至略微落后于其前代产品 RTX 4060 也就不足为奇了。 RTX 4060.
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Gaming (16033 - 80022, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (21841 - 33119, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (12242 - 62849, n=140, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (20726 - 28040, n=9) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (4310 - 25984, n=137, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (7166 - 9828, n=8) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
| Average of class Gaming (984 - 16978, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (4395 - 6027, n=7) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 20180 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 49085 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 18022 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7561 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender | |
| v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (24 - 242, n=9) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=130, last 2 years) | |
| v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (49 - 214, n=10) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 228, n=135, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
游戏基准测试的情况与此类似，不过宏碁 Nitro V 15 在这方面也比较弱。如果将分辨率限制在 1,920 x 1,080 像素，目前大多数游戏至少都能以中高细节流畅运行。如果你想从系统中挤出更多的 FPS，你可以像往常一样使用升频等功能。包括 DLSS 平衡 黑色行动 7 的运行速度为 40 FPS，而不是使用极限预设时的 24 FPS。四倍帧生成甚至将性能提升至令人印象深刻的 103 FPS，不过速度的主观感受可能会略有不同。
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF -2! | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 -1! | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (17.7 - 169.9, n=138, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (55.3 - 76.9, n=8) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (37.2 - 246, n=114, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (59.4 - 100.5, n=8) | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (47.9 - 186.9, n=118, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (88.1 - 123.6, n=6) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 248, n=133, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (84.8 - 144.6, n=8) | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.4 - 150.2, n=136, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (65.5 - 87.2, n=8) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| HP Victus 15-fa2160ng | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 175.1 | 162 | 93.6 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 99.5 | 82.8 | 84.8 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 80.4 | 66.9 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 76.3 | 66.1 | 59.4 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 76 | 62.6 | 55.3 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 46.4 | 40.2 | 28.8 | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 59.5 | 50.1 | 30.6 | |
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 45.5 | 41.4 | 32.1 | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 (2025) | 64.8 | 51.1 | 26.4 | |
| ARC Raiders (2025) | 81.7 | 64.5 | 43.5 | |
| Anno 117: Pax Romana (2025) | 56 | 40.7 | 20.2 | |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 (2025) | 87 | 70 | 24 |
| Call of Duty Black Ops 7 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme Preset + Raytracing | |
| Average of class Gaming (2 - 60, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (24 - 27, n=2) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (53 - 151, n=9, last 2 years) | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (70 - 75, n=2) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| The Outer Worlds 2 | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9.81 - 49.9, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (26.4 - 33.2, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Average of class Gaming (20.4 - 82.3, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (51.1 - 60, n=3) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| ARC Raiders | |
| 1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Raytracing AA:TSR | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 79.8, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (43.5 - 49.2, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:TSR | |
| Tulpar T6 V3.5 | |
| Average of class Gaming (40.9 - 114.5, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Nitro V14 AI ANV14-62-R9LT | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (64.5 - 71.5, n=3) | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, Core 7 240H: Ø53 (50.4-53.6)
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H: Ø58.6 (55.6-59.5)
HP Victus 15-fa2160ng GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, i5-13420H: Ø65.9 (61.8-66.6)
Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 250: Ø80 (76.1-80.8)
Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, R7 260: Ø82.5 (77.1-83.6)
排放量
噪音排放
由于 CPU 和 GPU 均未达到最大值，因此 15 英寸处理器在负载情况下仍比大多数竞争对手安静。在 赛博朋克 2077中的 45 分贝(A)明显可闻，但并不令人不安。在空闲模式下，Cyborg 15 可以长时间保持相对安静，风扇有时甚至完全关闭。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25 / 28 / 33 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 44 / 50 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -19% | -7% | 1% | -32% | 4% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24 | 27 -13% | 24 -0% | 24 -0% | 25 -4% | 25.5 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25 | 27 -8% | 28 -12% | 28 -12% | 43 -72% | 25.5 -2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 28 | 37.5 -34% | 29 -4% | 29 -4% | 45 -61% | 25.5 9% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 33 | 38 -15% | 33 -0% | 30 9% | 48 -45% | 26.9 18% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 44 | 56.3 -28% | 48 -9% | 40 9% | 53 -20% | 34.6 21% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 45 | 52 -16% | 46 -2% | 51 -13% | 50.1 -11% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 50 | 56.3 -13% | 54 -8% | 48 4% | 53 -6% | 50.1 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度也还可以。在高负载情况下，顶部和底部的最高温度分别为 46 和 45 °C（约 114.8 和 113 °F）。在空闲模式下，Cyborg 15 的某些弱点很明显，其温度往往高于竞争对手。
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32 °C / 89.6 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-3.2 °C / -5.8 F).
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 16% | 9% | 9% | -0% | 9% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 46 | 47.5 -3% | 46 -0% | 43 7% | 49 -7% | 42.2 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45 | 35.5 21% | 49 -9% | 43 4% | 58 -29% | 51.7 -15% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 36 | 27.7 23% | 28 22% | 37 -3% | 32 11% | 28.5 21% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 38 | 29.5 22% | 30 21% | 28 26% | 29 24% | 29.2 23% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 FurMark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，酷睿 7 240H 和GeForce RTX 5050 的温度稳定在 73 °C（163.4 °F）左右。
发言人
尽管 Cyborg 15 的低音也比较弱，但扬声器的表现比游戏机的平均水平略好。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
能源消耗
虽然空闲时的耗电量并不离谱，但与其他 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑相比，这款 15 英寸笔记本电脑在负载情况下相对节俭。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.1 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 14.9 / 16.3 / 22.2 Watt |
| Load |
72 / 117 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 29% | -6% | -3% | -35% | -18% | -41% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 14.9 | 6 60% | 16.8 -13% | 7.9 47% | 20 -34% | 6.9 54% | 13.8 ? 7% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 16.3 | 8.8 46% | 17.6 -8% | 9.2 44% | 20.7 -27% | 10.7 34% | 19.6 ? -20% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 22.2 | 11.9 46% | 19.8 11% | 13.5 39% | 22.7 -2% | 11.3 49% | 25.8 ? -16% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 72 | 89 -24% | 66 8% | 78 -8% | 71 1% | 69.7 3% | 110.5 ? -53% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 90.3 | 106.5 -18% | 128.4 -42% | 153.1 -70% | 162.6 -80% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 89.6 | 105 -17% | 126.7 -41% | 151.1 -69% | 165 -84% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 117 | 99 15% | 119 -2% | 187 -60% | 172 -47% | 233.6 -100% | 258 ? -121% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt) | 90.3 |
* ... smaller is better
能耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø99.7 (97.5-103.1)
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.3 (14.9-22.2)
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø90.3 (88.7-96.9)
带外部监控器的能耗
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø66.4 (61.6-73.9)
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø73.6 (72.7-76.2)
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø85.1 (82.8-106)
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø15.4 (14.4-18.7)
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø89.6 (87-93.7)
电池寿命
遗憾的是，电池续航时间落后于前代产品。在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，当亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 时，续航时间只有不到 5.5 小时，与惠普 Victus 15 和联想 LOQ 15 相比还是可以接受的。
| MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Core 7 240H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 55.2 Wh | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 76 Wh | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng i5-13420H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 70 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 39% | 2% | -20% | -17% | 80% | 24% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 5.4 | 7.5 39% | 5.5 2% | 4.3 -20% | 4.5 -17% | 9.7 80% | 6.71 ? 24% |
| Reader / Idle (h) | 13.6 | 6.9 | 9.23 ? | ||||
| H.264 (h) | 8 | 11.5 | 7.93 ? | ||||
| Load (h) | 2.3 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.472 ? | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd (h) | 0.9 |
Notebookcheck 总体评分
微星 Cyborg 15 是一款极具视觉冲击力的 15 英寸游戏机，以经济实惠的价格提供了稳定的性能，但在显示（色彩空间）和 GPU 能力（微弱的 TGP）方面有些薄弱。
MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG
- 01/28/2026 v8
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 75.2%  | MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG Intel Core 7 240H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. msi Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG-257US ... 2. msi Cyborg 15 B2RW Cyborg 15... 3. MSI Cyborg 15 B2RWEKG-258US ... List Price: 1099 EUR | 2.2 kg | 23.2 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
2. 82.4% v7 (old)  | MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF Intel Core i7-12650H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. msi CYBORG1512043 Cyborg 15 ... 2. 120W Adapter/AC Charger for ... 3. 120W AC Charger Compatible w... List Price: 1799 Euro | 2 kg | 22.9 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
3. 73.7%  | Acer Nitro V 15 ANV15-52-50S2 Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | List Price: 1049 EUR | 2.1 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
4. 75.8%  | HP Victus 15-fa2160ng Intel Core i5-13420H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. HP Victus 15.6" 144Hz Full H... 2. HP Victus 15.6" FHD 144HZ Ga... 3. HP Victus 15.6 inch Laptop, ... List Price: 1000 EUR | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
5. 77.5%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Lenovo LOQ 15 AI Gaming Lapt... 2. Lenovo LOQ RTX 5060 Gaming L... 3. Lenovo LOQ RTX 5060 Gaming L... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
6. 87.2%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. ASODI L19C4PC0 5B10W86196 60... 2. L20C4PC1 Laptop Battery Repl... 3. YFLAPFAN (1 Pair) New CPU GP... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
