结论RTX 5050 笔记本电脑首秀喜忧参半
来自 Medion 的 Erazer Scout 17 E1 最令人兴奋的当然是全新的图形加速器。通过GeForce RTX 5050 笔记本电脑，Nvidia 在移动中端市场中占据了一席之地，并在大多数情况下为全高清显示器提供了足够的性能。
尽管如此，许多玩家还是希望它能比前代产品 RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 有更大的飞跃（见下面的基准测试）。除了所使用的显卡外，这款笔记本电脑本身也有很多优点和缺点。
金属盖的机身、稳固的底座和良好的输入设备都相当令人信服，但在细节方面还存在一些弱点。
除了色域覆盖率低、144 Hz 屏幕亮度一般之外，音质不佳、缺乏连接选项（无 USB 4、无读卡器）也有很多不足之处。
最重要的是，电池续航时间极短，尽管这可能是一个错误，因为测试中的数值低得可疑。
您也不要指望 Erazer Scout 17 E1 的 CPU 速度会特别快。英特尔酷睿 5 210H 处理器落后于这个价位的其他游戏笔记本电脑。
总的来说，Scout 17 E1目前在我们看来有点太贵了，因为有更快的配备RTX 5060笔记本电脑的价格仅不到1250欧元（截至8月25日），而第一款基于RTX 5070的笔记本电脑起价约为1300欧元。
在这种情况下，1000 欧元左右的定价会更加合适。
Pros
Cons
Erazer Scout 17 E1 的竞争对手包括其他基于 Nvidia Blackwell 的中端游戏笔记本电脑，如 联想 LOQ 15和 联想Legion 5 15和 微星 Katana 17 HX.
较旧的 Erazer Crawler E40配备了 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU也作为对比设备出现在我们的图表中。
规格
机箱：Clevo 裸机，带金属盖
这款机箱来自裸机专家 Clevo，与联想 LOQ 15 或微星 Katana 17 相比，给人留下的印象质量更高一些。
机箱盖由金属制成，其他表面在较强的压力下几乎不会变形。做工和铰链也几乎无可挑剔。不过，机身容易沾染指纹--无论如何，大多数深色笔记本电脑都是如此。
Scout 17 E1 重 2.7 千克，不一定是一款轻便的笔记本电脑，在这方面与微星的同类产品不相上下。
不含机脚的整体高度约为 2.6 厘米，含机脚的高度略低于 3.5 厘米。因此，Erazer Scout 17 E1 既不薄也不厚。
设备良好的 Wi-Fi 吞吐量，但没有读卡器或 USB4
接口
如前所述，制造商取消了读卡器和 USB4 接口。在四个可用的 USB 端口中，有一个是 Type-C 格式，不支持 Power Delivery，但支持 DisplayPort 1.4。
外接显示器也可通过 HDMI 或 mini DisplayPort（均位于机身后部）直接连接。此外，还有一个音频接口、一个 RJ45 插座和一个用于安装 Kensington 锁的开口。
交流
Erazer Scout 17 E1 使用英特尔 Wi-Fi 芯片。在发射和接收测试中，Wi-Fi 6E AX211 与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 路由器的表现都不错。
网络摄像头
你不要指望网络摄像头能带来什么奇迹；集成的 720p 网络摄像头的图像清晰度相当差，而且没有隐私快门。
配件
笔记本电脑配有 180 瓦的电源装置和一本相当厚的说明书。
维护
拧下底部的 13 颗十字螺丝后，机箱底座就可以比较容易地从固定处取下。机箱内部除了冷却系统、电池和 WLAN 模块外，还有两个内存插槽和两个固态硬盘插槽。一个固态硬盘插槽仍然空闲。
可持续性
遗憾的是，包装中使用了大量塑料。其他制造商在这方面做得更好。
保修
Medion 在德国为 Erazer Scout 17 E1 提供 24 个月的保修服务。
输入设备全尺寸 RGB 键盘和大型触摸板
键盘
由于键程相对较长，Scout 17 E1 的键盘让人联想到机械键盘的代表，尽管键入感觉相当柔和。其他制造商可以借鉴这种布局，因为其排列几乎没有偏离德国标准。
由于空间充足，这款 17 英寸机型还配备了功能齐全的数字键盘。当然，还配备了可配置的 RGB 灯光。为了突出游戏玩家的目标群体，WASD 键采用了透明设计。
触摸板
作为一款 17 英寸设备，Erazer Scout 17 E1 的触摸板非常大，表面积为 15 厘米 x 9 厘米，在使用过程中无论是精度、滑动性能还是手势都表现出色。
显示屏面板暗淡，色域覆盖率低，没有 PWM
144 Hz IPS 面板在纸面上看起来相当不错，但在实际使用中，一些缺点也显而易见。
首先是亮度，平均 260 cd/m² 的亮度值相当适中，这使得 17 英寸屏幕很难适合户外使用。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 279 cd/m²
Contrast: 1163:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.97 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.82}
calibrated: 4.58
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
56.3% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
37.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.201
CCT: 6937 K
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 BOEhydis NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3", 144 Hz | Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 BOE HF NV156FHM-N4G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 CSOT MNF601BA1-4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6", 144 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 LEN151WQXGA, OLED, 2560x1600, 15.1", 165 Hz | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK CSOT MNH301CA3-1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3", 240 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 61% | 77% | 132% | 121% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 37.7 | 61.4 63% | 67.3 79% | 99.9 165% | 97.3 158% |
| sRGB Coverage | 56.3 | 89.7 59% | 99.2 76% | 100 78% | 99.6 77% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39 | 63.2 62% | 69.1 77% | 98.3 152% | 89 128% |
| Response Times | 50% | -50% | 98% | 58% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 21.4 ? | 8 ? 63% | 33.9 ? -58% | 0.42 ? 98% | 5.2 ? 76% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 15 ? | 9.6 ? 36% | 21.2 ? -41% | 0.4 ? 97% | 9.2 ? 39% |
| PWM Frequency | 1152 ? | ||||
| PWM Amplitude * | 11 | ||||
| Screen | -4% | 33% | 62% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 279 | 364 30% | 318 14% | 492 76% | 296 6% |
| Brightness | 260 | 351 35% | 300 15% | 495 90% | 272 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 89 -1% | 92 2% | 87 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.43 -79% | 0.2 17% | 0.27 -13% | |
| Contrast | 1163 | 847 -27% | 1590 37% | 1096 -6% | |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.97 | 3.98 20% | 1.33 73% | 0.9 82% | 1.35 73% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.52 | 6.38 69% | 4.42 78% | 1.8 91% | 4.76 77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.58 | 1.36 70% | 0.94 79% | 0.78 83% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 4.39 -158% | 1.9 -12% | 1.2 29% | 2.7 -59% |
| Gamma | 2.201 100% | 2.58 85% | 2.187 101% | 2.16 102% | 2.201 100% |
| CCT | 6937 94% | 7316 89% | 6678 97% | 6291 103% | 6770 96% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 36% /
17% | 20% /
31% | 97% /
87% | 66% /
46% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩空间也可以做得更好。与竞争对手相比，Erazer Scout 17 E1 在 sRGB 色彩空间中已经失灵，这使得游戏、电影和图片显得相当苍白。
至少，1,163:1 的实测对比度还算不错，黑色亮度为 0.24 cd/m²。
从 IPS 的角度来看，其响应时间和视角稳定性都不尽如人意。
幸运的是，我们没有观察到任何 PWM 闪烁。
总体而言，Erazer Scout 17 E1 的画质表现一般，在显示特性方面逊色于同类产品。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 15 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 21.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 32 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8276 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能罕见的酷睿 5 210H 再次亮相
Erazer Scout 17 E1 的性能在游戏笔记本中处于中下水平。16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘的估计价格是合理的，尤其是后者可以根据需要进行升级。
测试条件
控制中心有三种操作模式，分别针对不同的使用场景。除电池测试外，所有测量均在 "性能 "模式下进行，该模式下的 CPU 和 GPU 性能略高于 "娱乐 "模式。
在静音模式下，速度明显下降，但设备在负载情况下仍然安静得多。
| 模式 | 性能 | 娱乐 | 静音 |
| 赛博朋克 2077 噪音 | 55 dB(A) | 49 dB(A) | 33 dB(A) |
| 赛博朋克 2077》性能（FHD/超高清） | 76.9 fps | 71.2 fps | 44.8 fps |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Score | 1888 分 | 1787 分 | 711 分 |
| CPU PL1 | 49 W | 38 W | 15 W |
| CPU PL2 | 115 W | 115 W | 30 W |
处理器
核心 5 210H 酷睿 5 210H是英特尔 "猛禽湖 "一代中相当罕见的型号。这款 10 纳米芯片包含四个包含超线程技术的性能内核和四个不包含超线程技术的效率内核，因此总共可以实现 12 个并行线程。
210H 在与同类笔记本处理器的竞争中有些吃力。A 酷睿 i5-13500H根据我们的 CPU 评级，速度快了近 12%，而 Ryzen 7 250约为 20%。而 Ryzen 7 260和 酷睿 i7-14650HX甚至冲刺了约 30%。
Cinebench R15 多回路
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (7192 - 85542, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (7190 - 12857, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average of class Gaming (35040 - 252486, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (36942 - 61679, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1728 - 10389, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (1610 - 2180, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (74258 - 76434, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (5020 - 33636, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (5262 - 5715, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (17585 - 134044, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (17880 - 26483, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average of class Gaming (19065 - 241777, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (33605 - 51414, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average of class Gaming (373 - 2531, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (496 - 635, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (3856 - 45446, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (3837 - 5928, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average of class Gaming (10805 - 62916, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (35563 - 37988, n=2) | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
系统性能
由于 CPU 性能稍弱，Erazer Scout 17 E1 在系统测试中排在了对比设备的最后一位（在 PCMark 10 中只有 Essentials 测试有效，之后该基准测试再次中止）。
主观而言，程序启动时间也比我们习惯的游戏笔记本稍长。
PCMark 10: Essentials
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 -2! | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 -1! | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop -1! | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12600, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2211, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2729, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=113, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (237 - 532, n=121, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 341, n=112, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Average of class Gaming (397 - 674, n=132, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
» No benchmarks for this notebook found!
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 97515, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (56977 - 58240, n=2) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 104349, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (58128 - 64804, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 133486, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (58085 - 60798, n=2) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=143, last 2 years) | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Average Intel Core 5 210H (92.7 - 99.9, n=2) | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
根据 LatencyMon 工具，延迟过高也是 Scout 17 E1 的一个问题。不过，许多（Windows）笔记本电脑都存在这个问题。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Medion 为 Scout 17 E1 配备了来自 Phison 的 M.2 2280 1 TB SSD。虽然 NVMe 硬盘不一定是同类产品中速度最快的，但在循环测试中没有出现像联想 LOQ 15 那样的掉帧现象。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
虽然 RTX 5060 笔记本电脑的着色器单元明显少于 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑(3,328 对 4,608），但 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑的 2,560 个着色器仅在一定程度上落后于 RTX 5060。
与上一代相比，主要的改进是 RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU是显存的增加。8 GB GDDR7 而不是 6 GB GDDR6 可能不是 2025 年的顶级产品，但对于这个价格和性能级别来说，多少还是合适的（RTX 5060，尤其是 RTX 5070 的显存值得更强烈的批评）。
TGP 设置为最大 115 W（包括动态升压）。尽管如此，RTX 5050 笔记本电脑在合成测试中仍难以超越前代产品。
老款 Erazer Crawler E40 平均仅慢 10%左右（在Fire Strike 测试中，差距至少接近 20%）。在这里，RTX 5060 笔记本电脑领先约 15%，而 RTX 5070 笔记本电脑仅快 20%多一点。
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 47989 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 76534 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 28133 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 247686 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 52328 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 23840 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9799 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (6.76 - 166.5, n=131, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16IMH9 RTX 4050 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Razer Blade 14 2025 | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 186.9, n=128, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Acer Nitro V 16 ANV16-41-R5AT | |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 177.2 | 170.4 | 117.6 | 93.7 | ||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 165.7 | 137.7 | 131 | 119.9 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 139.3 | 102 | 73.6 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 98.5 | 88.5 | 77.1 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 278 | 220 | 189.6 | 132 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 108.4 | 87.3 | 86.3 | 60 | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 98.1 | 87.7 | 76.9 | 47.2 | ||
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 86.2 | 64.1 | 62 | 58.4 | 45.7 | |
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 75.9 | 68.2 | 54.5 | 55.2 | 39.7 | |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 50.4 | 35.1 | 39.6 | 24.2 | ||
| Star Wars Outlaws (2024) | 46.5 | 41.2 | 33 | 32.6 | 23.2 | |
| Space Marine 2 (2024) | 79.2 | 75.6 | 70.8 | 65.7 | 49.5 | |
| Until Dawn (2024) | 79.9 | 54.2 | 41.3 | 39.5 | 30.4 | |
| Stalker 2 (2024) | 56.4 | 48 | 39.9 | 62.7 | 29 | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 52.1 | 15.6 | 0 () | 9.58 | ||
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 (2025) | 90.5 | 73.6 | 51.6 | 50.3 | 36.8 | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 51 | 43 | 29 | 29 | 25 | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered (2025) | 52.2 | 48.2 | 25 | 26.5 | 13.4 | |
| Doom: The Dark Ages (2025) | 58.4 | 52.6 | 51 | 49.5 | 31.9 | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 157 | 132 | 15 | 9 | 5 |
| Doom: The Dark Ages | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Nightmare AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (31.9 - 82.1, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Nightmare - DLSS Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (49.5 - 107.3, n=13, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High | |
| Average of class Gaming (25 - 64, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High + DLSS Quality | |
| Average of class Gaming (24 - 117, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Kingdom Come Deliverance 2 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
| Average of class Gaming (36.8 - 86, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
| Average of class Gaming (50.3 - 114.5, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| The Elder Scrolls IV Oblivion Remastered | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Average of class Gaming (12.7 - 41.7, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset + Quality DLSS | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.3 - 59.7, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| F1 25 | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (5 - 37.5, n=15, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset + DLSS Quality AA:DLSS AF:16x | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 67.5, n=14, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 | |
| Average Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop (n=1) | |
持续供电和散热也是值得肯定的。在《赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高画质下的长期测试中，帧率相对稳定。
赛博朋克 2077》1080p 超高帧频图
排放：风扇声音大，但表面温度低
噪音排放
以 Clevo 的标准来看，风扇控制出奇的好。在空闲模式下，冷却系统的运行噪音通常在 27 到 29 分贝（A）之间，而临时加速的噪音则限制在 32 分贝（A）。
不幸的是，在负载情况下，风扇的声音会变得相当大，这在大多数游戏笔记本电脑中并不少见。47 至 58 dB(A) 相当于一个清晰可闻的音量，如果不戴耳机，这个音量就会变得很难听。许多竞争对手在这方面的表现同样不佳。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 27 / 29 / 32 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 47 / 58 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) | ||
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | -24% | 11% | -7% | |
| off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 25 -4% | 25.5 -6% | 25 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27 | 23 15% | 43 -59% | 25.5 6% | 31 -15% |
| Idle Average * | 29 | 23 21% | 45 -55% | 25.5 12% | 32 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32 | 28.02 12% | 48 -50% | 26.9 16% | 34 -6% |
| Load Average * | 47 | 50.21 -7% | 53 -13% | 34.6 26% | 50 -6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 55 | 51 7% | 50.1 9% | 58 -5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 58 | 56.79 2% | 53 9% | 50.1 14% | 59 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.46 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
即使在游戏过程中，表面温度也始终保持在 50 °C 以下。我们尤其喜欢掌托区域的温度从未超过 30 °C。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.9 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29 °C / 84.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 18% | -9% | 2% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 36 14% | 49 -17% | 42.2 -0% | 52 -24% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 36 20% | 58 -29% | 51.7 -15% | 56 -24% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 30 | 26 13% | 32 -7% | 28.5 5% | 33 -10% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35 | 27 23% | 29 17% | 29.2 17% | 32 9% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在使用 Furmark 和 Prime95 工具进行的压力测试中，GeForce RTX 5050 笔记本电脑的温度稳定在 73 ℃ 左右，而酷睿 5 210H 则达到 80 ℃ 左右，这两个数值都可以接受。
扬声器
Scout 17 E1 的最大缺点之一是音质较差。与 Crawler E40 一样，不仅最大音量不足，而且低音也不足。
大多数游戏笔记本电脑的音质往往要好得多。
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.47 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理：越野车电池运行时间
耗电量
插上电源后，功耗并不高。空闲功耗介于 13 瓦至 23 瓦之间，负载功耗介于 87 瓦至 195 瓦之间，与配备 RTX 4050 Laptop GPU 的前代产品类似。
| Off / Standby | 0 / 1 Watt |
| Idle | 13.5 / 14.8 / 22.9 Watt |
| Load |
87 / 195 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop | Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 10% | -5% | 20% | -10% | -22% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 13.5 | 10 26% | 20 -48% | 6.9 49% | 9.7 28% | 13.9 ? -3% |
| Idle Average * | 14.8 | 15.3 -3% | 20.7 -40% | 10.7 28% | 15 -1% | 20 ? -35% |
| Idle Maximum * | 22.9 | 15.5 32% | 22.7 1% | 11.3 51% | 23.7 -3% | 26.8 ? -17% |
| Load Average * | 87 | 88 -1% | 71 18% | 69.7 20% | 126 -45% | 108.3 ? -24% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 173.4 | 153.1 12% | 162.6 6% | 205 -18% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 171.9 | 151.1 12% | 165 4% | 202 -18% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 195 | 202.47 -4% | 172 12% | 233.6 -20% | 227 -16% | 260 ? -33% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 155 |
* ... smaller is better
耗电量：赛博朋克 2077 / 压力测试
耗电量：外部显示器
电池寿命
Erazer Scout 17 E1 的电池寿命相当奇怪。虽然 53 Wh 的电池容量相当有限（目前的同类产品采用 60 Wh 至 80 Wh 的电池），但在我们的 WLAN 测试中，在亮度降低到 150 cd/m² 的情况下，运行时间仅为 1.5 小时，这表明存在漏洞或驱动程序问题。
起初，我们以为是专用 GPU 的问题，因为 Nvidia 的 Blackwell 系列目前仍在为黑屏、能耗增加和众多笔记本电脑图形切换故障等问题而苦苦挣扎（测试时我们使用的是最新的 581.08 版驱动程序）。
不过，在完全停用 dGPU 时也会出现这种现象。我们已就此联系 Medion。
| Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Core 5 210H, GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop, 53 Wh | Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 i5-13500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 54 Wh | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 R7 250, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 60 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 R7 260, GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop, 80 Wh | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK i7-14650HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop, 75 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 161% | 184% | 509% | 221% | 311% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 95 | 248 161% | 270 184% | 579 509% | 305 221% | 390 ? 311% |
| H.264 | 231 | 687 | 466 ? | |||
| Load | 72 | 75 | 72 | 87.1 ? | ||
| Reader / Idle | 414 | 577 ? | ||||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 56 |
Notebookcheck 对 Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 的总体印象
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 因配备了全新的 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑而格外引人注目。不过，就目前的价格而言，我们会推荐配备 RTX 5060 或 RTX 5070 的更便宜的游戏笔记本电脑，其中一些产品的价格几乎不超过 Scout 17 E1。
不过，其他 RTX 5050 笔记本电脑在入门级和平均定价方面的排名还有待观察。
Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758
- 08/27/2025 v8
Florian Glaser
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 76.2%  | Medion Erazer Scout 17 E1 MD62758 Intel Core 5 210H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5050 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB | List Price: 1250 EUR | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 17.30" 1920x1080 127 PPI IPS |
2. 85.4% v7 (old)  | Medion Erazer Crawler E40 - MD 62518 Intel Core i5-13500H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $123.00 15.6" FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 for... 2. $119.99 15.6" FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 144... 3. $125.99 15.6" FHD 1920(RGB)*1080 144... List Price: 1200 Euro | 2.3 kg | 28 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
3. 77.5%  | Lenovo LOQ 15AHP10 AMD Ryzen 7 250 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $75.99 Hodeay 300W Laptop Charger C... 2. $120.99 20V 12.25A 245W Slim Tip Cha... 3. $103.33 Bayjebu Parts for Lenovo LOQ... | 2.4 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" 1920x1080 141 PPI IPS |
4. 87.2%  | Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP G10 AMD Ryzen 7 260 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,699.00 Lenovo Legion 5 15AHP10 RTX ... 2. $1,199.99 Lenovo Legion 5 15.1" OLED W... 3. $14.99 GKLSPL 230W Slim AC Charger ... List Price: 1449€ | 1.9 kg | 21.5 mm | 15.10" 2560x1600 200 PPI OLED |
5. 77.3%  | MSI Katana 17 HX B14WGK Intel Core i7-14650HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,498.00 MSI Katana 15 HX B14WGK-248C... 2. $46.99 GVKRLXZ 230W AC Adapter Comp... 3. $12.99 Rujcloud HDMI 2.1 Cable for ... List Price: 1800 EUR | 2.7 kg | 28 mm | 17.30" 2560x1440 170 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
