Notebookcheck

RazerBlade Stealth 13 2021年的回顾。采用OLED面板的移动游戏机

不仅是优势。 Razer提供了其紧凑的Blade Stealth 13,除了熟悉的IPS显示屏外,还有一个OLED屏幕。这提供了像极快的响应时间和伟大的画面这样的优势,但也有像PWM闪烁以及电池寿命明显缩短这样的劣势。
Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Touchscreen Ultrabook Tiger Lake

RazerBlade Stealth 13是一款13.3英寸规格的紧凑型游戏副本,依靠英特尔的Tiger-Lake U处理器和Nvidia的快速显卡组合(GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q)。制造商提供了两个版本,一个是哑光全高清IPS显示屏,售价2000欧元(约合人民币2362元),我们在去年年底已经测试过,另一个是亮光1080p OLED触摸屏,售价2250欧元(约合人民币2657元),我们今天将仔细看看这个版本。由于屏幕是唯一的区别因素,我们将只限于新的OLED触摸屏,以及在这次审查中对电池寿命的影响。所有其他信息和关于性能的细节都可以在我们对IPS版本的详细审查中找到。

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED (Blade Stealth Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-1165G7 4 x 2.8 - 4.7 GHz, Tiger Lake UP3
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - 4096 MB, Memory: 1250 MHz, Optimus
Memory
16384 MB 
, LPDDR4-4266, Dual-Channel, Onboard
Display
13.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, capacitive, ATNA33XC01-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Tiger Lake-UP4 PCH-LP
Storage
Lite-On CA5-8D512, 512 GB 
, 393 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake-U/Y PCH-LP - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 15 x 305 x 210
Battery
53.1 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p IR
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Quad speakers, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 100W PSU, Razer Synapse, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.472 kg, Power Supply: 591 g
Price
2250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.8 %
09/2021
Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED
i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.5 kg15 mm13.30"1920x1080
85.5 %
04/2021
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
1.4 kg15.3 mm13.30"1920x1080
87.8 %
03/2021
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.3 kg14.6 mm13.90"3000x2000
85.3 %
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450
1.3 kg17 mm13.30"1920x1080
86.9 %
06/2020
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
1.6 kg23 mm13.50"3000x2000
88 %
06/2021
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg14.8 mm13.40"3456x2160

显示屏 -Blade Stealth 带OLED触摸屏

我们已经回顾了Blade Stealth 13的哑光1080p IPS屏幕。 在之前的测试中.这绝不是一个糟糕的面板,但响应时间相当慢,特别是对于一个游戏笔记本电脑来说。可选的OLED触摸屏也提供全高清分辨率,但由于额外的触摸屏,它依赖于光泽的表面。

正如预期的那样,OLED屏幕没有反应时间慢的问题,而且在其他方面以出色的主观画质给人留下深刻印象。色彩鲜艳,由于完美的黑色水平,对比度非常高,而且由于该技术,没有光晕。然而,我们可以测量到典型的OLED PWM闪烁,频率为240赫兹,亮度为40%或更低,这可能会给敏感的用户带来问题。

391
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
396
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA33XC01-0
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 396 cd/m² Average: 390.2 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 386 cd/m²
Contrast: 9625:1 (Black: 0.04 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 2.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
97.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED
ATNA33XC01-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 13.30
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Sharp LQ133M1JW46, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
TIANMA XM, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.90
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
CMN139D, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.30
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
Panasonic MEI96A2, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.50
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
Samsung 134XK01, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.40
Display
-23%
-24%
-22%
-25%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
100
66.01
-34%
64.91
-35%
66.43
-34%
63.54
-36%
99.67
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
97.38
-3%
94.42
-6%
97.61
-2%
95.05
-5%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97.5
67.05
-31%
66.34
-32%
67.53
-31%
65.65
-33%
97.68
0%
Response Times
-1288%
-835%
2739%
-1286%
23%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
3.6 ?(1.6, 2)
57.6 ?(26, 31.6)
-1500%
37.6 ?(17.6, 20)
-944%
66 ?(30.4, 35.6)
-1733%
57 ?(28, 29)
-1483%
2.2 ?(1.2, 1)
39%
Response Time Black / White *
3.2 ?(2, 1.2)
37.6 ?(20.4, 17.2)
-1075%
26.4 ?(11.6, 14.8)
-725%
28.8 ?(11.6, 17.2)
-800%
38 ?(22, 16)
-1088%
2.2 ?(1, 1.2)
31%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(40)
26040 ?(40)
10750%
240.4 ?(51)
0%
Screen
-99%
-73%
-87%
-68%
-29%
Brightness middle
385
356.8
-7%
502
30%
423
10%
391
2%
384
0%
Brightness
390
336
-14%
474
22%
405
4%
367
-6%
387
-1%
Brightness Distribution
97
88
-9%
89
-8%
83
-14%
86
-11%
97
0%
Black Level *
0.04
0.34
-750%
0.33
-725%
0.23
-475%
0.19
-375%
Contrast
9625
1049
-89%
1521
-84%
1839
-81%
2058
-79%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
2.3
1.63
29%
1.35
41%
3.2
-39%
3.07
-33%
4.56
-98%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.8
5.03
26%
3.67
46%
5.8
15%
4.74
30%
7.27
-7%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
2.5
1.08
57%
1.2
52%
1
60%
1.52
39%
4.52
-81%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.3
3
-131%
1.7
-31%
4.7
-262%
3.6
-177%
1.5
-15%
Gamma
2.2 100%
2.23 99%
2.24 98%
1.99 111%
2.29 96%
2.26 97%
CCT
6507 100%
6434 101%
6440 101%
6362 102%
6330 103%
6219 105%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
62
61.1
61.9
61
87.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
97.6
94.3
97.5
95
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-470% / -252%
-311% / -171%
877% / 491%
-460% / -233%
-2% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

亮度约为390cd/m²,比IPS机型略好。我们使用专业的CalMAN软件进行分析,Blade Stealth 13在出厂时已经配备了相应的色彩配置文件,用户无需进行后续校准。一些颜色显示出比3更高的DeltaE-2000偏差(与P3参考值相比),但在灰阶中没有明显的偏色。

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN ColorChecker
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 灰度标定
CalMAN 饱和度已校准
CalMAN 饱和度已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准

通过我们自己的校准(X-Rite i1 Pro 2),我们可以略微改善灰度水平的偏差,但色彩准确度甚至在整体上变得极差。尽管有P3的全面覆盖,但该面板因此并不适合编辑图片/视频,尽管这肯定不是游戏笔记本的重点。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 1.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz ≤ 40 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17025 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

OLED触摸屏的视角稳定性非常好,尽管根据角度不同会出现轻微的变色,但这是OLED面板的典型特征。光滑的表面使户外使用比雾面IPS面板更困难。此外,亮度不够高,无法补偿反射。因此,只有在阴天才能舒适地使用。

视角稳定
视角稳定
在阳光下(有反射
在阳光下(有反射
在阳光下(无反射
在阳光下(无反射

电池寿命 - 与OLED相比,续航能力明显下降

在电池容量方面没有任何变化(53.1Wh),但OLED触摸屏需要的电量明显多于 IPS面板.与所有采用OLED面板的设备一样,这也取决于内容;由于技术的原因,明亮的内容只是比黑暗的内容需要更多的电力。例如,在我们的Wi-Fi测试中,Blade Stealth 13的IPS型号持续了9个小时(150cd/m²),而OLED型号现在只持续了不到4.5小时。在全亮度下,它甚至只有3.5小时。这对这样一个紧凑的笔记本来说可能是一个淘汰标准,它也适合于移动使用。

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing 1.3
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2021
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh
629 min ∼100% +144%
HP Envy 13-ba1475ng
i7-1165G7, GeForce MX450, 51 Wh
624 min ∼99% +142%
Average of class Subnotebook
  (258 - 1223, n=118, last 2 years)
582 min ∼93% +126%
Razer Blade Stealth i7-1165G7 GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 53.1 Wh
541 min ∼86% +110%
Microsoft Surface Book 3 13.5
i7-1065G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 69 Wh
396 min ∼63% +53%
Dell XPS 13 9310 OLED
i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 52 Wh
391 min ∼62% +52%
Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED
i7-1165G7, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q, 53.1 Wh
258 min ∼41%
Battery Runtime
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 (Edge 93)
4h 18min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3 max Brightness (Edge 93)
3h 35min

Pros

+ 纤细的金属外壳
+ 2个Thunderbolt 4
+ 高性能
+ 良好的画质和快速的响应时间

Cons

- 带有PWM闪烁的OLED
- 电池寿命明显缩短
- 反射性显示表面
- 内存不能扩展

结论 - OLED在游戏方面令人信服,但限制了移动性

在审查中。RazerBlade Stealth 13 OLED。测试设备由英特尔德国提供。
在审查中。RazerBlade Stealth 13 OLED。测试设备由英特尔德国提供。

基本上,RazerBlade Stealth 13没有什么变化,当然,因为它仍然是市场上最快的13英寸笔记本之一,配备GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q。两种可用配置之间的唯一区别是显示屏。如果你想要OLED触摸屏,你必须多付250欧元(约295美元)。

作为回报,你可以得到更好的主观画质,色彩艳丽,对比度极高。响应时间也要好得多;标准的IPS面板在这方面仍有问题。额外的触摸屏也可以成为一个优势,这取决于应用的情况。

画面质量好,响应时间快。对于游戏来说,可选的OLED屏幕非常好,但它也对这台紧凑的13英寸笔记本电脑的电池寿命产生了巨大影响。

然而,也有缺点,如PWM闪烁和屏幕表面的反射。此外,Blade Stealth 13是一个非常紧凑和移动的笔记本电脑,电池寿命肯定可以发挥重要作用。然而,OLED屏幕需要更多的电力,在我们的实际WLAN测试中,运行时间减半。在购买决定中肯定要考虑这一差异。

价格和可用性

配备OLED触摸屏的RazerBlade Stealth 13在数码港以2250欧元欧元(约合人民币2,657元)立即供货;配备哑光IPS面板的基本型号,价格为2,000欧元。($2,362)

Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 OLED - 09/20/2021 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
89 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
75%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
63 / 75 → 84%
Weight
69 / 20-75 → 90%
Battery
59%
Display
89%
Games Performance
82 / 78 → 100%
Application Performance
92 / 85 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
83%
Audio
71 / 91 → 78%
Camera
38 / 85 → 45%
Average
76%
84%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Ninh Duy
Editor of the original article: Ninh Duy - Editorial Assistant - 201955 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008
contact me via: Facebook
Stefan Hinum
Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 18108 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > RazerBlade Stealth 13 2021年的回顾。采用OLED面板的移动游戏机
Andreas Osthoff, 2021-09-21 (Update: 2021-09-21)