结论 - Mini-ITX PC,采用移动式 120 瓦 AMD Zen 5 CPU
Framework Desktop 的独特之处在于,它采用迷你 ITX 外形,搭载 120 瓦移动式 AMD Ryzen Zen 5 CPU。采用相同处理器的小型迷你电脑价格相近,包括 GMK EVO-X2或 BOSGAME M5但是,Framework 运行起来更安静、更凉爽,效率也出奇地高,而且更易于维护或修理。
仍有改进的余地。例如,安装扩展卡时,需要将设备从工作台上抬起或倾斜。废热从侧板排出,可能会影响定位。它不支持 PCIe5 固态硬盘、可升级内存、AMD PRO CPU 或 ECC 内存,但这些可能是 AMD 处理器的限制,而不是框架设计的限制。对于一款可靠的迷你 PC/台式机混合解决方案来说,这些不足都是微不足道的。
Pros
Cons
今年 2 月发布Framework Desktop 是公司的第三款主要产品,也是 Framework 系列中的首款 Mini-ITX 台式机。该系统秉承了与 Laptop 13.5 或 Laptop 16 系列相同的设计理念,将易于维修和兼容扩展卡作为首要任务。
我们的测试机是中间配置,配备 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 CPU、集成 Radeon 8060S GPU 和 64 GB 内存,价格约为 1600 美元。低端机型则配备 Ryzen AI Max 385 和 Radeon 8050S,而最高端机型则包括 128 GB 的焊接内存。
作为迷你 PC 和台式机的混合体,Framework Desktop 的竞争对手包括 GMK EVO-X2, BOSGAME M5或 Beelink SER9 Pro 等机型竞争,它们都提供与 Framework Desktop 相同的处理器选项。
更多 Framework 评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
与采用相同处理器的其他 PC(包括 GMK EVO-X2、BOSGAME M5 或 Beelink GTR9 Pro)相比,Framework Desktop 更大、更重。当然,造成这种差异的原因是,Framework 设计有出色的可维护性和集成式 PSU,无需外接交流适配器。
连接性
值得注意的端口包括后部的五个视频输出端口和前部的两个 USB-C 3.2 Gen.2 端口。前置的两个端口兼容自 2021 年原版框架笔记本电脑推出以来的扩展卡。 最初的框架笔记本电脑(2021 年.
交流
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max |
维护
可持续性
系统采用 30% 的 PCC 塑料和 50% 的 PCC 铝制造,包装完全可回收且不含塑料。不过,配件都是单独包装的,包括每个扩展卡和磁砖,如果一次订购大量配件,就会造成纸板的过度使用。
配件和保修
DIY 版包括 CPU 风扇安装套件和安装用螺丝刀,而扩展卡、磁贴和 CPU 风扇都是可选项。塑料磁贴以 3 x 7 的网格装饰系统前面板,纯粹是为了美观和个性化。未来,Framework 也许会支持 RGB LED 瓷砖,以实现更多的定制化功能。
如果在美国购买,制造商提供标准的一年有限保修服务。
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前,我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。在 Framework Desktop 上,VRAM 默认设置为 8 GB,但为了本次评测的目的,我们将其设置为 16 GB。
处理器
多线程性能 Ryzen AI Max+ 395 的原始多线程性能 与 Core Ultra 9 275HX也就是英特尔目前最快的 Arrow Lake-HX 选件之一。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile -11! | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng -1! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (29063 - 37423, n=4) | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (2034 - 2044, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
Beelink SER9 Pro |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (11357 - 14641, n=4) | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (791 - 800, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (4830 - 5723, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
Beelink SER9 Pro |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (314 - 317, n=4) | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (86 - 107, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (116237 - 125052, n=4) | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (6474 - 6540, n=4) | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (2791 - 2978, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (2184 - 2275, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (32.4 - 36.2, n=4) | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (45.8 - 52, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Beelink SER9 Pro | |
HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (0.3984 - 0.4094, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max -1! | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (64158 - 82725, n=4) | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (183760 - 227429, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (8151 - 9413, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (145339 - 154404, n=4) | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (29155 - 31681, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (97193 - 121827, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (139734 - 155770, n=3) | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (2001 - 2431, n=4) | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (34297 - 43268, n=4) | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (81626 - 94259, n=4) | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
Performance Rating | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
PCMark 10 / Score | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (8733 - 9125, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (10949 - 12005, n=4) | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (10010 - 10377, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (16185 - 16551, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (1948 - 2274, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (1701 - 2790, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (2331 - 2949, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (1541 - 1719, n=4) | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (302 - 358, n=4) | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (252 - 317, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (424 - 453, n=4) | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8875 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (148904 - 158525, n=4) | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (121931 - 123769, n=4) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (209816 - 216896, n=4) | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (131.9 - 140.5, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET |
* ... smaller is better
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
BOSGAME M5 |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
原始图形性能 Radeon 8060S介于 移动版GeForce RTX 4060和 移动 RTX 4070根据 3DMark DX11 和 DX12 测试结果。尽管如此,Nvidia GPU 在实时光线追踪效果方面更加有效,这一点从其更高的 Speed Way 和 Port Royal 分数中可以看出。
3DMark 11 Performance | 33216 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 67013 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 26308 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 11002 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2164 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
虽然主要不是游戏机,但整体性能与移动GeForce RTX 4060 相当,是一款不错的 1080p 游戏机。遗憾的是,该系统与最近的 AMD FSR4 更新不兼容,因为 GPU 采用的 RDNA 3.5 架构与 Radeon 890M而不是 Radeon RX 9000 RDNA4 系列。
Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 -1! | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 -1! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Average AMD Radeon 8060S (49.4 - 65.8, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
1920x1080 Very Ultra Preset | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 8060S (40.3 - 64.6, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
2560x1440 Very Ultra + FSR Quality | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 8060S (48.4 - 54.7, n=3) | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
2560x1440 Very Ultra Preset | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Average AMD Radeon 8060S (27.4 - 57.6, n=4) | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 |
Assassin's Creed Shadows | |
1920x1080 High | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Radeon 8060S (47 - 57, n=4) | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET | |
1920x1080 Ultra High | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Average AMD Radeon 8060S (32 - 40, n=4) | |
2560x1440 Ultra High | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
GMK EVO-X2 | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
Average AMD Radeon 8060S (25 - 34, n=4) | |
2560x1440 Ultra High + DLSS Quality | |
Zotac GeForce RTX 5060 Low Profile | |
Alienware 16X Aurora, RTX 5070 | |
2560x1440 Ultra High + FSR Quality | |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max | |
BOSGAME M5 | |
Average AMD Radeon 8060S (23 - 40, n=4) | |
GMK EVO-X2 |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD FSR | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 185.7 | 182.3 | 181.5 | 97 | 75.7 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 228 | 205 | 171.1 | 147.5 | 99.4 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 204 | 132.3 | 93.3 | 67.8 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 93 | 72.9 | 58.3 | ||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 566 | 260 | 215 | 187 | 122.3 | ||
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 146 | 121.5 | 102.9 | 100.8 | 71.8 | ||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 152.1 | 124.4 | 97.7 | 86.1 | 51.4 | ||
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 76.2 | 67 | 64.8 | 42.6 | |||
F1 24 (2024) | 269 | 248 | 187.5 | 58.1 | 61.9 | 38 | |
Black Myth: Wukong (2024) | 87 | 67 | 51 | 28 | 29 | 21 | |
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 76.7 | 58.9 | 54.1 | 48.4 | 33.4 | ||
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 71.5 | 61.7 | 49.1 | 35.6 | |||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 72 | 67 | 57 | 40 | 40 | 33 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 23.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.6 / 40.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max Radeon 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ 395, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101 | GMK EVO-X2 Radeon 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | BOSGAME M5 Radeon 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Kingston OM8PGP42048N-A0 | HP Z2 Mini G1a Radeon 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET Radeon 8050S, Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Lexar NQ7A1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -18% | -14% | -38% | -8% | -17% | |
off / environment * (dB) | 23.2 | 24.9 -7% | 24.8 -7% | 24.9 -7% | 24.6 -6% | 24.8 -7% |
Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.4 | 27.4 -17% | 25 -7% | 32.1 -37% | 24.6 -5% | 25.4 -9% |
Idle Average * (dB) | 23.4 | 27.5 -18% | 25.1 -7% | 32.4 -38% | 24.6 -5% | 25.4 -9% |
Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.4 | 27.5 -18% | 25.1 -7% | 32.6 -39% | 24.6 -5% | 25.5 -9% |
Load Average * (dB) | 36.6 | 47.5 -30% | 48.8 -33% | 41.1 -12% | 40.7 -11% | 49.8 -36% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 39.8 | 47.3 -19% | 46.6 -17% | 67 -68% | 45.4 -14% | 49.6 -25% |
Load Maximum * (dB) | 40.1 | 47.2 -18% | 48.6 -21% | 67.3 -68% | 45.4 -13% | 49.8 -24% |
Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 47.4 | 46.5 | 70 | 49.7 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
压力测试
平均 CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 28 |
Prime95 压力 | 3.8 | -- | 64 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.7 | 1129 | 62 |
赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.7 | 2873 | 52 |
能源管理
耗电量
框架桌面比 GMK EVO-X2尽管两者都配备了性能相同的 Ryzen AI Max Ryzen AI Max+ 395 处理器。如下图所示,运行Prime95 或Cyberpunk 2077各需要约 144 W,而 GMK 系统则需要约 178 W。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, , x, | GMK EVO-X2 Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | BOSGAME M5 Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, Kingston OM8PGP42048N-A0, , x, | HP Z2 Mini G1a Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, Radeon 8060S, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, , x, | HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET Ryzen AI Max PRO 390, Radeon 8050S, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14" | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Lexar NQ7A1, , x, | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -0% | -17% | -12% | 26% | 40% | |
Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 10 | 6.5 35% | 9.3 7% | 7.1 29% | 4.5 55% | 2.4 76% |
Idle Average * (Watt) | 10.5 | 8.2 22% | 11.5 -10% | 9.5 10% | 7.5 29% | 4.6 56% |
Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 10.9 | 10.5 4% | 16.4 -50% | 13.8 -27% | 8.3 24% | 9.2 16% |
Load Average * (Watt) | 81.1 | 84.3 -4% | 83.9 -3% | 76.7 5% | 80.7 -0% | 78.4 3% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 140.6 | 178.1 -27% | 174.2 -24% | 195.1 -39% | 104.1 26% | 77.8 45% |
Load Maximum * (Watt) | 164.2 | 214.9 -31% | 200.9 -22% | 245.4 -49% | 125.1 24% | 95.1 42% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 106.5 |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
笔记本检查评级
Mini-ITX 台式机采用非传统的 AMD Zen 5 移动 CPU,是一款多功能系统。
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max
- 09/17/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Framework Desktop Ryzen AI Max AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,549.95 GPD Win Max 2 2025 [AMD Ryze... List Price: 1600 USD | 3.1 kg | 96.8 mm | x | |
GMK EVO-X2 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,999.99 List Price: 1499€ | 1.6 kg | 77 mm | x | |
BOSGAME M5 AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 2024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $21.29 Mini PC Computer Protective ... 2. $21.99 UL Listed 19V 3A 3.42A AC Ad... List Price: 1469€ | 1.3 kg | 57 mm | x | |
HP Z2 Mini G1a AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,631.03 HP Z2 Mini G1a Workstation -... 2. $2,227.70 HP Z2 Mini G1a Workstation -... 3. $1,915.21 HP Z2 Mini G1a Workstation -... List Price: 3175 EUR | 2.6 kg | 85.5 mm | x | |
HP ZBook Ultra G1a A3ZQ0ET AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8050S ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,599.95 List Price: 2545 Euro | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS LED | |
Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $999.00 List Price: 999€ | 709 g | 46.9 mm | x |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.