Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395是一款功能强大的 Strix Halo 系列处理器，于 2025 年 1 月首次亮相。该 APU 配备 16 个 Zen 5 CPU 内核，主频高达 5.1 GHz，拥有 40 CU RDNA 3+ Radeon 8060S 图形适配器和 50 TOPS XDNA 2 神经引擎。与非 PRO 芯片不同的是，该芯片采用了 AMD 安全处理器（封装内的 ARM 安全协处理器）、Windows 设备防护和 AMD-Vi。其他值得注意的功能包括 PCIe 4、USB 4 和 LPDDR5x-8000 内存支持以及大量 L3 高速缓存。

架构和功能

与 Strix Point 不同，Strix Halo 部分采用 Zen 5 核心--这里没有 Zen 5c。目前还不清楚这究竟是具有完整 AVX512 吞吐量的桌面版 Zen 5，还是移动版 Zen 5。根据 AMD 的说法，由于分支预测的改进和其他改进，Zen 5 的 IPC 比 Zen 4 提高了 16%。

在其他方面，AI Max+ PRO 芯片支持快至 LPDDR5x-8000 的内存，并与 USB 4（以及 Thunderbolt）原生兼容。它支持 PCIe 4.0，每个通道的吞吐量为 1.9 GB/s，就像其 8000 系列的前代产品一样。集成的 XDNA 2 NPU 可提供多达 50 个 INT8 TOPS，用于加速各种人工智能工作负载。

性能

从泄露的信息中，我们得知 Ryzen 的 Geekbench 6.3 Multi 分数约为 20,700 分，这意味着它可以与 Ryzen 9 9900X 等非常强大的桌面 CPU 相媲美。

图形处理器

截至 2025 年 1 月，Radeon 8060S 是 AMD 提供的最强大的 iGPU。它拥有 40 个 RDNA 3+ 架构 CU（2560 个统一着色器），可与GeForce RTX 4050 等中低端台式机显卡相媲美。毫无疑问，这块 GPU 可以在 Ultra 上以 1080p 运行任何游戏，然而，最终的问题是笔记本电脑的散热解决方案是否足够强大，让 iGPU 大放异彩。

当然，Radeon 能够驱动四台 SUHD 4320p60 显示器。它还能高效地编码和解码最流行的视频编解码器，包括 AVC、HEVC、VP9 和 AV1。与英特尔 Lunar Lake 芯片不同的是，它不支持最新加入的 VVC 编解码器。

功耗

AI Max+ PRO 395 的功耗最高可达 120 W，具体取决于系统及其 TDP 功率目标，最低 TDP 为 45 W。

截至 2025 年 1 月，CPU 内核采用 4 纳米台积电工艺制造，能效相当不错。

CodenameStrix Halo PRO
SeriesAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)

Series: Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Strix Halo PRO

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 « 3 - 5.1 GHz16 / 32 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3903.2 - 5 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3853.6 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 3803.6 - 4.9 GHz6 / 12 cores16 MB L3
Clock Rate3000 - 5100 MHz
Level 2 Cache16 MB
Level 3 Cache64 MB
Number of Cores / Threads16 / 32
16 x 5.1 GHz AMD Zen 5
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)55 Watt
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
SocketFP11
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8000 RAM, PCIe 4, USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
GPUAMD Radeon RX 8060S ( - 2900 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date01/06/2025
Product Link (external)www.amd.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
45.4 pt (76%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
42.4 -7%
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
42.6 -6%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
43.1 -5%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
43.1 -5%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 -3%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 -2%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
44.9 -1%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
45.7 1%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
46 1%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 1%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.6 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
46.8 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
47.4 4%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
48.5 7%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
49.1 8%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
49.5 9%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50 10%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 32%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 112.2     avg: 112.6     median: 112.6 (63%)     max: 113 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 1643     avg: 1691     median: 1690.5 (31%)     max: 1738 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 30706     avg: 35061     median: 35061 (33%)     max: 39416 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -99%
...
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28225 -19%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
28872 -18%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
29063 -17%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
29352 -16%
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX
29400 -16%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
29464 -16%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30428 -13%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -7%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33078 -6%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
35061
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
35813 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
38701 10%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
39065 11%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
40117 14%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 207%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 2003     avg: 2013     median: 2012.5 (85%)     max: 2022 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -96%
...
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
1967 -2%
Intel Core i7-14650HX
1969 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
1976 -2%
Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
1977 -2%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
1985 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
1988 -1%
Intel Core Ultra 5 225H
1992 -1%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2000 -1%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
2010 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
2013
Intel Core i7-13800H
2017 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
2034 1%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2044 2%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 3%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
2090 4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H
2095 4%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
2139 6%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H
2145 7%
...
Apple M4 Pro (14 cores)
2270 13%
max:
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
2359 17%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 783     avg: 787     median: 787 (86%)     max: 791 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 11816     avg: 13429     median: 13428.5 (33%)     max: 15041 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4784     avg: 5247     median: 5247 (33%)     max: 5710 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -99%
...
Intel Core i7-14700HX
3752 -28%
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
3918 -25%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
4320 -18%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
4437 -15%
Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX
4455 -15%
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4522 -14%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4565 -13%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4724 -10%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
4830 -8%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
5247
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5363 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 7%
Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
5618 7%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
5985 14%
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
6043 15%
Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
6232 19%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 202%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
02905808701160145017402030232026102900319034803770406043504640493052205510Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 305     avg: 306     median: 306 (85%)     max: 307 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
62.9 Points (81%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.6 Points (86%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
8580 points (52%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
60278 points (44%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
108876 Points (70%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
15953 Points (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
31.8 s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.7 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
4649 points (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 109760     avg: 117149     median: 117148 (67%)     max: 124537 MIPS
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5613     avg: 5998     median: 5998 (71%)     max: 6383 MIPS
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
182.8 fps (61%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
316 fps (73%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 30.4     avg: 31.7     median: 31.7 (56%)     max: 33 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.6 GB/s (47%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
2.5 GB/s (43%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
15.6 GB/s (41%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 132     avg: 145.5     median: 145.5 (2%)     max: 159 Seconds
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 90     avg: 96     median: 96 (1%)     max: 102 Seconds
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4027     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4127 sec
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
16509 Points (35%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
8.2 s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
23.9 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
89313 Points (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 21268     avg: 23295     median: 23295 (57%)     max: 25322 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
77244 Points (63%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
79672 Points (66%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 20971     avg: 21827     median: 21826.5 (55%)     max: 22682 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 29555     avg: 31057     median: 31057 (55%)     max: 32559 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 9596     avg: 9831     median: 9831 (41%)     max: 10066 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2756     avg: 2824     median: 2823.5 (71%)     max: 2891 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 16503     avg: 16679     median: 16679 (65%)     max: 16855 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
3105 points (99%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
21003 points (86%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2071     avg: 2141     median: 2141 (84%)     max: 2211 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16565     avg: 17408     median: 17408 (31%)     max: 18251 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2072 points (9%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
16377 points (52%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
8865 points (89%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
65863 points (66%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 428     avg: 430.5     median: 430.5 (1%)     max: 433 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 225     avg: 250     median: 250 (69%)     max: 275 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 275     avg: 304.5     median: 304.5 (55%)     max: 334 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1892     avg: 1909     median: 1909 (71%)     max: 1926 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 116.5     avg: 151.8     median: 151.8 (26%)     max: 187.1 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 115.3     avg: 170.7     median: 170.7 (31%)     max: 226 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 7.45     avg: 8.5     median: 8.5 (6%)     max: 9.5 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
7.2 Watt (8%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345678910Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
25.3 Points per Watt (19%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 28. 08:32:19

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:37:44 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.008s ... 0.009s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.01s

#7 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.011s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18881 +0.025s ... 0.036s

#10 got single benchmarks 18881 +0.013s ... 0.049s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.049s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +1.407s ... 1.456s

#13 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.456s

#14 return log +0s ... 1.456s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)

» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
   12x 3.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
   12x 2 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 9 365
   10x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
   8x 2 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 385
   8x 3.6 GHz - 5 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380
   6x 3.6 GHz - 4.9 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
   16x - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
   16x - 5.4 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX
   24x 2.1 GHz - 5.4 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
   16x 3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
   16x 2.3 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
   16x 2.5 GHz - 5.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-14900HX
   24x 1.6 GHz - 5.8 GHz
- Apple M4 Max (14 cores)
   14x 2.59 GHz - 4.51 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > AMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300) Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-01-10)