结论 - ProArt PX13 GoPro Edition CPU 性能卓越,但 60 Hz 屏幕是个问题
华硕 ProArt PX13 的 GoPro 版是你能买到的最强大的 13 英寸笔记本电脑之一,最快的 AMD Strix Halo 芯片的加入使多核 CPU 性能和内存容量得到了大幅提升。这对 Radeon 8060s iGPU 也有好处,但原始性能实际上与旧版 RTX 4070 相当。GoPro 版在设计上也有一些变化。尤其是新的盖子设计看起来非常漂亮,还有一些细微的蓝色视觉亮点。
整体性能非常不错,但风扇会在系统紧张时发出很大的声音,我们还注意到我们的设备上有一些线圈啸叫。不过,最大的问题还是屏幕,因为华硕仍在使用上一版本的 OLED 面板。除了在亮度较高的内容上图像略有颗粒感外,它的刷新率只有 60 Hz。这在 2024 年已经是一个诟病,而在 2026 年对于一款高端产品来说则很难自圆其说。另一方面,出厂校准仍然非常出色。
总而言之,新款 ProArt PX13 GoPro 版是一款非常时尚、功能强大的 13 英寸可折叠产品,但考虑到其高昂的价格,60 赫兹的屏幕让人难以接受。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
我们目前还没有关于评测配置的定价和可用性的信息。
华硕更新了其紧凑型 13 英寸可折叠 ProArt PX13,还推出了采用全新设计的 GoPro 特别版。它还放弃了 Ryzen 9 HX 370 和GeForce RTX 4070 的组合,转而采用 AMD Strix Halo 芯片 Ryzen AI Max+ 395 和强大的 Radeon 8060s 以及高达 128 GB 的内存。另一方面,显示屏没有变化,仍然是刷新率为 60 Hz 的 2.8K OLED 触摸屏。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和连接
虽然基本的机身结构与前代产品相似,但新的 GoPro 版在视觉上进行了一些调整,并加入了微妙的蓝色亮点。我们尤其喜欢盖子上带有磨砂质感的新设计图案。它们引人注目,但同时又不会过于浮夸。底座仍然是我们熟悉的光滑表面,与盖子相比更容易沾染指纹。整体质量(制造质量和稳定性)再次给人留下了极好的印象。很明显,您可以翻转可转换机的屏幕,这使得它的用途非常广泛。PX13 的重量约为 1.4 千克,是我们所比较的功能非常强大的紧凑型笔记本电脑中最轻的设备之一。
连接功能与以前相比没有变化,也就是三个 USB 端口(2 个 USB 4.0)和 HDMI。microSD 读卡器的传输速率很高,但不支持速度更快的 SD Express 卡。我们记录了 Wi-Fi 7 模块的高传输速率和 1080p 网络摄像头的工作,但图像质量并不理想。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Convertible (28.1 - 209, n=24, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Convertible (28.9 - 254, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

配件
输入设备
显示屏 - 60 赫兹 OLED
与前代产品相比,华硕没有对显示屏进行改动,仍然是三星的同款面板。它的像素为 2880 x 1800,可以显示清晰的图像,但由于触控层的存在,明亮的内容会显得有些颗粒感。此外,深黑色、丰富的色彩和快速的响应时间也会让你受益匪浅,但问题还是出在仅为 60 Hz 的刷新率上,这对于 2026 年的高端产品来说是远远不够的。
这也体现在亮度上。SDR 的结果比以前略好,平均亮度为 380 尼特,但对于现代 OLED 而言,这仍然不是很好。HDR 的最大亮度为 628 尼特(全屏为 535 尼特),还算可以,但其他面板也能轻松达到 1000 尼特以上。
在我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件进行的分析中,出厂校准再次表现出色,而且还获得了准确的 sRGB 配置文件,因此 PX13 非常适合图片和视频编辑(P3 和 sRGB 色域)。我们可以检测到 PWM 闪烁,但华硕提供了一个软件解决方案来减少闪烁问题。请参阅我们对 前代产品了解更多信息。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 381 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
89.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
CCT: 6555 K
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA NB140B9M-T01, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 144 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 140WT2, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W TL134ADXP03, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4", 180 Hz | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 ATNA33AA08-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | 3% | -2% | -0% | -0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.8 | 99.5 0% | 99.7 0% | 95.1 -5% | 99.4 0% | 99.6 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.6 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 89.9 | 88.7 -1% | 98.2 9% | 89.7 0% | 88.9 -1% | 89 -1% |
| Response Times | 39% | 43% | -201% | -8% | -3093% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.73 ? | 0.26 ? 85% | 0.75 ? 57% | 5.4 ? -212% | 1.94 ? -12% | 77.2 ? -4362% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.45 ? | 0.4 ? 72% | 1.03 ? 29% | 4.2 ? -190% | 1.63 ? -12% | 71.6 ? -4838% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 240 ? | 720 ? | 240.62 ? | 240 ? | 14880 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 50 | 70 -40% | 29 42% | 50 -0% | 90 -80% | |
| Screen | -32% | -21% | -16% | -5% | 40% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 381 | 497 30% | 393.8 3% | 518 36% | 360 -6% | 638 67% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 385 | 495 29% | 389 1% | 489 27% | 358 -7% | 621 61% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 96 -2% | 96 -2% | 91 -7% | 98 0% | 95 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.3 | 0.02 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.6 -45% | 1.27 -15% | 1.5 -36% | 1.1 -0% | 0.6 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.1 | 4.5 -114% | 3.35 -60% | 4 -90% | 2.3 -10% | 1.4 33% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 2.5 -92% | 2 -54% | 1.6 -23% | 1.4 -8% | 0.8 38% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.19 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.16 102% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6555 99% | 6567 99% | 6379 102% | 6536 99% | 6554 99% | 6430 101% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 0.71 | 1.1 | |||
| Contrast (:1) | 1727 | 18000 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-7% | 8% /
1% | -73% /
-45% | -4% /
-5% | -1018% /
-753% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.45 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.78 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.67 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.73 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.91 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.82 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 50 % | ≤ 50 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8006 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能 - AMD Strix Halo
测试条件
华硕提供了熟悉的电源模式,可通过组合键(Fn+F)快速更改。我们使用性能模式进行测试。
| 能源概况 | TDP | CB2024 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 赛博朋克 2077 1080p Ultra |
最大风扇噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 静音 | 50/40W | 1063 点 | 6811 点 | 54 fps | 40.3 dB(A) |
| 标准 | 65/55W | 1518 点 | 9334 点 | 71.9 fps | 47.2 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 85/70W | 1672 点 | 10434 点 | 79.5 fps | 53.4 dB(A) |
| 电池(标准) | 60/55W | 1405 分 | 9231 分 | 67.5 fps | 47.2 dB(A) |
处理器
......(英文 Ryzen AI Max+ 395Ryzen AI Max+ 395 提供 16 个成熟的 Zen 5 内核,因此多核 CPU 性能比上一代 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 有了大幅提升(30-50%,具体取决于基准测试结果)。与新的 Lunar Lake 相比,它的速度也更快。 Core Ultra X7 358H相比,它在多核测试中的速度也要快得多,但在单核测试中就落后了。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro -11! | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (1648 - 1912, n=8) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (420 - 1673, n=43, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (114 - 116.8, n=8) | |
| Average of class Convertible (88 - 129.8, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (29063 - 37423, n=8) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (1317 - 30959, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (2034 - 2052, n=8) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average of class Convertible (740 - 2188, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (11357 - 14641, n=8) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (595 - 12102, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (791 - 803, n=8) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average of class Convertible (273 - 834, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (4739 - 5881, n=8) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average of class Convertible (478 - 4940, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (314 - 318, n=8) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 317, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average of class Convertible (105 - 1051, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (86 - 107, n=6) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (116237 - 136872, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 121368, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (6474 - 6540, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6655, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16510 - 22157, n=6) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2291 - 21269, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (2791 - 2978, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1003 - 3020, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (16535 - 24593, n=6) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (1608 - 22023, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (2184 - 2275, n=6) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (806 - 2275, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (32.4 - 40.3, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (3.43 - 36.2, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (42.5 - 84.3, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (45.8 - 58.4, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.3915 - 0.84, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (0.3915 - 0.4094, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 -1! | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA -1! | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W -1! | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible -1! | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (62222 - 82725, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1480 - 64158, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (183760 - 227429, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (11392 - 184800, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (8151 - 9475, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (797 - 8291, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (145339 - 154404, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (14686 - 148874, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (29096 - 31931, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1120 - 29155, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (96454 - 121827, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (4929 - 97193, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (139734 - 190280, n=5) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (5271 - 190280, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (2017 - 2431, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (218 - 2017, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (34220 - 43587, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Convertible (1169 - 34297, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (81626 - 94259, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Convertible (14193 - 85327, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
主观性能给人的印象非常好,所有输入都能顺利执行,没有任何明显的延迟。在评测期间,我们也没有遇到任何稳定性问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro -4! | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (8732 - 10111, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3229 - 10123, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (10949 - 12005, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average of class Convertible (7233 - 12222, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (9762 - 16652, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (5062 - 17914, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (15152 - 16755, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (2496 - 16551, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (1948 - 2274, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (524 - 2274, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (1701 - 2790, n=6) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (554 - 1942, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (2331 - 2949, n=6) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (550 - 2949, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (1541 - 1719, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Average of class Convertible (381 - 1719, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (302 - 358, n=6) | |
| Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (252 - 317, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 317, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Average of class Convertible (407 - 1089, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395, AMD Radeon 8060S (424 - 470, n=6) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 10111 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (148904 - 163031, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (23880 - 161475, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (121832 - 123769, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (19931 - 131960, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (209816 - 216896, n=6) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Average of class Convertible (17473 - 216896, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 (131.9 - 140.5, n=6) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Average of class Convertible (6.9 - 536, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
PX13 仍然只能使用单个 M.2-2230 SSD(PCIe 4.0)。我们的评测机配备了闪迪的 2 TB 硬盘(1.7 TB 可用),传输速率超过 6 GB/s,性能非常出色。在持续工作负载下,性能也没有下降。
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
Radeon 8060s Radeon 8060s是市场上速度最快的 iGPU,性能也超过了新的 Panther Lake Arc B390有相当大的优势。不过,更有趣的对比是之前的 PX13 与 RTX 4070.从基准测试结果来看,Radeon 8060s 实际上只是略微快一些,而在我们的游戏测试中,这两种型号也基本相当。
AMD 仍具有共享内存的优势,虽然系统可以自动调整 VRAM,但您也可以为 GPU 分配专用内存(最高可达 96 GB)。这有利于图像和视频编辑,RTX 4070 的 8 GB VRAM 可能会成为一个问题。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 31617 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24438 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 10469 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2019 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 9866 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Convertible (n=1last 2 years) | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average of class Convertible (159 - 2067, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Average AMD Radeon 8060S (132 - 163, n=8) | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Average of class Convertible (147 - 423, n=18, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (7.14 - 90.6, n=39, last 2 years) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (4.48 - 86.6, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (10.8 - 176.8, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Convertible (18.8 - 142, n=55, last 2 years) | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 90.6 | 68.6 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 213 | 178.3 | 158.9 | 138.3 | 88.5 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 198.8 | 121.9 | 84.9 | 63.3 | 36.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 123.7 | 102.8 | 72.7 | 57.8 | ||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 484 | 224 | 198.2 | 176.8 | 113.1 | 58.6 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 90.5 | 60.8 | 29.4 | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 133.3 | 108.3 | 87.6 | 79.5 | 49.4 | 20 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 225 | 208 | 168.2 | 52.5 | 34.4 |
排放与功耗
系统噪音
在一个 13 英寸的小机箱中实现如此高的性能,对散热解决方案来说是一个挑战,而且当你对系统施加压力时,风扇的噪音会很大(高达 53.2 dB(A))。 旧型号.我们在评测设备中还发现了一些线圈啸叫。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43.2 / 53.4 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 10% | 8% | -7% | 10% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.3 | 25 -3% | 22.9 6% | 23.6 3% | 24.7 -2% | 23.9 2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.3 | 25 -3% | 23.3 4% | 23.6 3% | 24.7 -2% | 23.9 2% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.3 | 25 -3% | 23.3 4% | 23.6 3% | 28.4 -17% | 23.9 2% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.3 | 25 -3% | 23.3 4% | 23.6 3% | 30.9 -27% | 23.9 2% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 43.2 | 36.4 16% | 34 21% | 37.5 13% | 43 -0% | 30.2 30% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 53.4 | 45.9 14% | 43.5 19% | 45.4 15% | 53.3 -0% | 44.5 17% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 53.4 | 45.9 14% | 45.7 14% | 45.4 15% | 53.3 -0% | 44.5 17% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.5 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.7 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.2 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the class Convertible.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.7 °C / 87.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-2.8 °C / -5.1 F).
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 5% | 11% | -6% | -9% | 5% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 41.5 | 35.3 15% | 34 18% | 42.5 -2% | 45.3 -9% | 47.3 -14% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45.7 | 44.3 3% | 35.8 22% | 44.9 2% | 47.9 -5% | 44.2 3% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25.8 | 25.5 1% | 25.6 1% | 29.6 -15% | 28.5 -10% | 22.1 14% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 26.8 | 26.7 -0% | 26.4 1% | 29.5 -10% | 29.9 -12% | 22.1 18% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
音质尚可,比 ROG Flow Z13相比要好得多,但与竞争对手如 Zenbook Duo, XPS 14或 MacBook Pro.
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
我们的功耗测量结果没有任何意外。满载时,系统功耗高达 130 瓦,在 110 瓦左右趋于稳定,因此 200 瓦的电源适配器绰绰有余。Strix Halo 系统的能效也比之前配备GeForce GPU 的型号更高。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, SanDisk PC SN5100S 2TB, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL82T0HBL1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Radeon 8060S, Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.4" | Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro M4 Pro (14 cores), M4 Pro 20-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, MiniLED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Average AMD Radeon 8060S | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | 34% | -57% | -23% | 2% | -40% | 14% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 5.3 | 4.8 9% | 3.1 42% | 10.4 -96% | 7.5 -42% | 2.17 59% | 7.84 ? -48% | 4.43 ? 16% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 7 | 9.8 -40% | 3.6 49% | 17 -143% | 9.3 -33% | 10.9 -56% | 9.95 ? -42% | 7.48 ? -7% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 7.2 | 10.2 -42% | 10 -39% | 17.3 -140% | 9.6 -33% | 11 -53% | 12.6 ? -75% | 9.66 ? -34% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 88.1 | 47.3 46% | 39.2 56% | 92.9 -5% | 74.1 16% | 74.3 16% | 83.5 ? 5% | 45.8 ? 48% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 103.5 | 75.3 27% | 51.2 51% | 113.2 -9% | 121.5 -17% | 80.5 22% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 113.7 | 76.3 33% | 51.4 55% | 109.3 4% | 121.6 -7% | |||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 128.4 | 96 25% | 101.4 21% | 138.1 -8% | 185 -44% | 98.1 24% | 177.8 ? -38% | 68.3 ? 47% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
电池寿命
笔记本检查评级
Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA
- 02/24/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306EA AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. 200W Rectangle Conn Compatib... 2. ROG 200W Charger for Asus Pr... 3. ASUS 2025 ProArt PX13 (Repla... List Price: 3900€ | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo UX8407AA Intel Core Ultra X9 388H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. ASUS Zenbook Duo ux8406 AI P... 2. ASUS Zenbook Duo AI Powered ... 3. ASUS Zenbook Duo Laptop, Dua... List Price: 2599€ | 1.7 kg | 23.4 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. Dell 14 Premium (Next Gen XP... 2. Dell XPS 14 9440 AI Powered ... 3. Dell XPS 14 9440 14.5" Noteb... List Price: 2200 USD | 1.4 kg | 14.62 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ROG Flow Z13 GZ302EA-RU073W AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 ⎘ AMD Radeon 8060S ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. ROG 200W Charger for Asus RO... 2. EXCaliberPC [2025] ASUS ROG ... 3. 200W Laptop Charger Compatib... List Price: 2499€ | 1.6 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.40" 2560x1600 225 PPI IPS | |
| Asus ProArt PX13 HN7306 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. i-Tensodo 2 Pack Anti Glare ... 2. 200W 20V 10A Laptop Charger ... 3. ASUS 2025 ProArt PX13 (Repla... List Price: 2999€ | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2024 M4 Pro Apple M4 Pro (14 cores) ⎘ Apple M4 Pro 20-Core GPU ⎘ 48 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3989 Euro | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" 3024x1964 254 PPI MiniLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.


































































