Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

NVIDIA GeForce MX330

Nvidia GeForce MX330是专用于笔记本电脑的入门级移动图形卡。它于2020年2月发布,基本上是重命名的Geforce MX250 / GeForce MX150 /台式机GeForce GT1030。它使用与MX250相同的GP108芯片(例如,GP108-655-A1)。它提供了与MX250和MX150相同的384个CUDA内核,并且频率仅略有提高(对于25瓦特版本,+ 12 MHz Boost = 0.8%)。专用的GDDR5图形内存通过64位内存总线连接,频率为3500 MHz(有效7000 MHz),最大带宽为48 GB / s。同样有25瓦和12瓦(低功率)的变体。

在Nvidia驱动程序中,GeForce MX330驱动程序的硬件ID为1D16。

GP108芯片采用16 nm FinFET工艺制造,并提供了许多新功能,包括对DisplayPort 1.4(就绪),HDMI 2.0b,HDR的支持以及改进的H.265视频解编码(PlayReady 3.0)。但是,由于需要至少3 GB的图形内存,因此无法运行Netflix的4K HDR。与较大的Pascal芯片相比, GP108不支持用于VR和G-Sync的同步多投影(SMP)。完整的改进清单和新的Pascal台式机GPU可在我们专用的Pascal架构文章中找到。

GeForce MX330的性能应与前几年的MX150和MX250相同。有关游戏基准,请参见我们的GeForce MX250页面。 Nvidia在产品页面上指出,MX330在i7-1065G7中提供的性能是Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7的2倍(而MX350是2.5倍)。因此,像Red Dead Redemption 2这样要求非常苛刻的游戏将无法流畅运行,而像FIFA 20或Farming Simulator 19这样要求较低的较旧游戏则应在中等设置下运行良好(请参阅以下有关不同笔记本电脑的基准测试结果)。但是,低功耗版本(请参见下文)显然会更慢。

有一个低功率版本的N17S-LP,其TGP为12瓦(从LP MX250的10瓦增加了2瓦)和一个“正常”的25瓦N17S-G3。两种变体的性能应该明显不同。低功耗型号提供了相对较慢的746-936 MHz频率·基本-Turbo),其中25瓦G3型号的频率为1531-1594(类似于MX250和+ 70%升压频率,而LP型号则类似)。

GeForce MX300 Series

GeForce MX450 896 @ 1.4 - 1.58 GHz64 Bit @ 10000 MHz
GeForce MX350 640 @ 1.35 - 1.47 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
GeForce MX330 384 @ 1.53 - 1.59 GHz64 Bit @ 7000 MHz
CodenameN17S-LP / N17S-G3
ArchitecturePascal
Pipelines384 - unified
TMUs32
ROPs16
Core Speed1531 - 1594 (Boost) MHz
Memory Speed7000 effective = 1752 MHz
Memory Bus Width64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR5
Shared Memoryno
Memory Bandwidth56.1 GB/s
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL 4.6
Power Consumption25 Watt (12 - 25 Watt TGP)
technology14 nm
PCIe3.0
DisplaysHDMI 2.0b, DisplayPort 1.4
FeaturesVulkan 1.1, OpenGL 4.6, OpenCL 1.2, GPU Boost 3.0, Multi Monitor, Optimus, GameWorks
Date of Announcement20.02.2020
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.nvidia.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1.7 pt (5%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -96%
...
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
1.593 -7%
1.594 -7%
1.66 -3%
1.665 -3%
1.667 -3%
1.679 -2%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
1.68 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
1.687 -2%
1.705 -1%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
1.714
AMD FirePro M6100
1.748 2%
1.772 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
1.778 4%
1.827 7%
1.844 8%
NVIDIA Quadro P600
1.86 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M SLI
1.87 9%
1.887 10%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
1.894 11%
...
21.1 1131%
max:
33.3 1843%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 1178     avg: 1236     median: 1235.5 (4%)     max: 1293 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 1059     avg: 1136     median: 1160 (3%)     max: 1190 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -90%
...
995 -12%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
999 -12%
1008 -11%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
1012 -11%
AMD Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
1050 -8%
1056 -7%
1070 -6%
AMD Radeon Pro 555
1078 -5%
AMD Radeon Pro 455
1118 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
1136
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
1148 1%
1156 2%
NVIDIA Quadro P600
1162 2%
1170 3%
unknown
1257 11%
1281 13%
1322 16%
AMD Radeon Pro 560
1376 21%
NVIDIA Quadro P620
1388 22%
...
19434 1611%
max:
36485 3112%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 234893     avg: 243721     median: 243721 (28%)     max: 252549 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 32370     avg: 49651     median: 49651 (6%)     max: 66932 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 12137     avg: 14691     median: 15382 (16%)     max: 16555 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 15595     avg: 19968     median: 20729 (5%)     max: 23580 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3308     avg: 3436     median: 3470 (6%)     max: 3530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3581     avg: 3727     median: 3762 (4%)     max: 3838 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 21238     avg: 45268     median: 45267.5 (5%)     max: 69297 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid
12842 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Night Raid Graphics Score
15787 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4898     avg: 5080     median: 5121.5 (7%)     max: 5180 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4616     avg: 4787     median: 4834 (4%)     max: 4863 Points
171.8 -96%
...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
4380 -9%
4404 -8%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
4502 -6%
4554 -5%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M SLI
4634 -3%
NVIDIA Quadro P600
4655 -3%
4678 -2%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
4698 -2%
4699 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce MX330
4787
4894 2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M
4913 3%
4957 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M
4974 4%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
5054 6%
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
5134 7%
5167 8%
AMD Radeon Pro 555
5185 8%
5213 9%
...
59943 1152%
max:
106023 2115%
0%
100%
Unigine Valley 1.0 - Unigine Valley 1.0 DX
18.1 fps (6%)
SPECviewperf 12
specvp12 sw-03 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
26.5 fps (7%)
specvp12 snx-02 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
3.4 fps (1%)
specvp12 showcase-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
16.5 fps (4%)
specvp12 mediacal-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
10.5 fps (3%)
specvp12 maya-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
27.1 fps (7%)
specvp12 energy-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp12 creo-01 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
12.2 fps (5%)
specvp12 catia-04 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
17.7 fps (3%)
specvp12 3dsmax-05 +
SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05
27.1 fps (5%)
SPECviewperf 13 specvp13 sw-04 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 sw-04
37.3 fps (10%)
specvp13 snx-03 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 snx-03
6.1 fps (1%)
specvp13 showcase-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 showcase-02
16.5 fps (4%)
specvp13 medical-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 medical-02
10.9 fps (2%)
specvp13 maya-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 maya-05
47.5 fps (5%)
specvp13 energy-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 energy-02
0.5 fps (0%)
specvp13 creo-02 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 creo-02
26.4 fps (4%)
specvp13 catia-05 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 catia-05
25.8 fps (3%)
specvp13 3dsmax-06 +
SPECviewperf 13 - specvp13 3dsmax-06
26.8 fps (5%)
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 93.4     avg: 98.2     median: 98.2 (6%)     max: 103 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
99.6 % (100%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
735 Samples/s (3%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
1047 Samples/s (2%)
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
2890 points (3%)
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 45     avg: 49.9     median: 49.9 (7%)     max: 54.8 Watt
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 48.3     avg: 73.6     median: 73.6 (10%)     max: 98.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
min: 53     avg: 57.6     median: 57.6 (13%)     max: 62.2 Watt
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency
0.2 fps per Watt (22%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
0.2 fps per Watt (19%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
min: 34.2     avg: 39.1     median: 39.1 (63%)     max: 43.9 dB(A)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Witcher 3 ultra
1683 MHz (66%)
Clock Speed - GPU Clock Speed Furmark
1403 MHz (56%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Outriders

Outriders

2021
med. 1920x1080
26  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
20.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
31
Hitman 3

Hitman 3

2021
med. 1920x1080
18.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Minimum Settings 1920x1080
26
low 1280x720
19.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
9.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
5.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
Low Preset 1920x1080
12
low 1280x720
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 5

Dirt 5

2020
low 1280x720
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
26.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
12  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 21

FIFA 21

2020
low 1280x720
125  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
79.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
75.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
63.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1280x720
119  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
48.6  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
40.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
36.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
85.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
8.2  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
61.7  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
11.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
8.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
28.4  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
6.9  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
3.3  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
27  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
33.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 2020

F1 2020

2020
low 1280x720
81  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Valorant

Valorant

2020
low 1280x720
147  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
118  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
106  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
94.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
34.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
35.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
51.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
58.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
20.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
med. 1920x1080
25.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
43.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
GRID 2019

GRID 2019

2019
low 1280x720
18.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
FIFA 20

FIFA 20

2019
low 1280x720
124  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
72.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
45.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Control

Control

2019
low 1280x720
44.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2019

F1 2019

2019
low 1280x720
59 73 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 31 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16 24 ~ 20 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13 19 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
52.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Rage 2

Rage 2

2019
low 1280x720
41.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
14.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 1800

Anno 1800

2019
low 1280x720
58.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
6.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
50  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
94.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
26.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.1  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
45  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
34.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.4  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
67.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
26.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
44.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
27.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
112  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.1  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
59.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
29.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23.2  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
18.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
164  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
62.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
37.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
28.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Hitman 2

Hitman 2

2018
low 1280x720
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
23.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
40  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
62  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
42 45 52.4 ~ 46 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
17 17 17.1 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10 12 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8 10 ~ 9 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
47.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
19.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
16.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
47  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
med. 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
high 1920x1080
15  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
33.4 71 74.9 ~ 60 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
47.3 50 56.5 ~ 51 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
35.9 44.1 51.3 ~ 44 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
18.1 23.9 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1280x720
49.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
37.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.2  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Fortnite

Fortnite

2018
low 1280x720
95  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
63.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
178  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
59.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
47.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Additional Benchmarks
Performance 1920x1080
111
low 1280x720
110 116 120.3 ~ 115 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
104 107 108.6 ~ 107 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
53.9 69.6 73.2 ~ 66 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
38.2 63.8 65.3 ~ 56 fps    + Compare
4K 3840x2160
21.9 25.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
63.8 64.7 ~ 64 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.2 37 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
17 19.2 19.9 ~ 19 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
ultra 1920x1080
11.2 12 ~ 12 fps    + Compare + 📈 Graph
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
173.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
113.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
96  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
37.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Outriders2620.914.6
Hitman 318.81514.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.019.79.226.185.09
Immortals Fenyx Rising361598
Yakuza Like a Dragon44.315.715.413.4
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War35.312.78.09
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla1898
Dirt 537.19.6
Watch Dogs Legion26.213.912
FIFA 2112579.575.163.1
Star Wars Squadrons11948.640.921.8
Mafia Definitive Edition36.716.515.8
Serious Sam 485.7138.16
Crysis Remastered61.722.811.98.86
Flight Simulator 202028.412.16.923.34
Horizon Zero Dawn2713119
Death Stranding33.414.713.713.4
F1 202081392816
Valorant147118106
Gears Tactics94.634.522.115.9
Doom Eternal35.3
Hunt Showdown51.61915.1
Escape from Tarkov58.233.723.321.6
Red Dead Redemption 220.815.1
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order25.721.38.72
Need for Speed Heat43.122.319.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 201942.523.214.513.9
GRID 201918.315.714.77.4
Ghost Recon Breakpoint2211104
FIFA 2012472.122.321.2
Borderlands 345.414.212.18.8
Control44.413.99.72
F1 201966242016
Total War: Three Kingdoms52.916.1
Rage 241.114.61312.9
Anno 180058.2118.646.13
The Division 2501987
Dirt Rally 2.094.529.326.816.1
Far Cry New Dawn45241514
Metro Exodus34.313.310.47.8
Apex Legends67.226.522.519.4
Just Cause 444.727.420.618.2
Darksiders III11230.123.120.5
Battlefield V59.429.423.218.7
Farming Simulator 1916462.237.528.3
Hitman 237.123.713.311
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey4019147
Forza Horizon 462312216
Shadow of the Tomb Raider4617119
Monster Hunter World47.619.716.813.3
Far Cry 547231514
X-Plane 11.1160514421
Kingdom Come: Deliverance49.821.318.312.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark37.11811.2
Fortnite9563.333.721
Rocket League17859.347.4
Dota 2 Reborn115107665624
The Witcher 364361912
BioShock Infinite173.9113.89637.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
8
28
14
6
42
9
7
46
5
4
40
2
1



2


For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 27. 09:40:14

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:40:10 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.072s ... 0.073s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.074s

#5 composed specs +0s ... 0.074s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.074s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.074s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9978 +0.035s ... 0.109s

#9 got single benchmarks 9978 +0.045s ... 0.154s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.154s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.895s ... 1.049s

#12 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 1.049s

#13 Got 245 rows for game benchmarks. +0.021s ... 1.07s

#14 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 1.07s

#15 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.041s ... 1.111s

#16 benchmarks composed for output. +2.352s ... 3.463s

#17 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.006s ... 3.469s

#18 return log +0s ... 3.469s

Notebook reviews with NVIDIA GeForce MX330 graphics card

Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-3W-5102: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 13.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Chromebook Spin 713 CP713-3W-5102

Acer Enduro Urban N3 EUN314-51WG-74PB: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Enduro Urban N3 EUN314-51WG-74PB

Dell Vostro 14 3401, i7-1165G7: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 14 3401, i7-1165G7

Asus ExpertBook B1 B1500C, i5-1135G7 MX330: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B1 B1500C, i5-1135G7 MX330

Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400C, 1165G7 MX330: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B1 B1400C, 1165G7 MX330

Asus ExpertBook B1 B1500C, i7-1165G7 MX330: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Asus ExpertBook B1500C, i7-1165G7 MX330

Asus VivoBook X515EP, i5-1135G7 MX330: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook X515EP, i5-1135G7 MX330

Asus Vivobook 15 K513EP-EJ104T: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 15 K513EP-EJ104T

Asus VivoBook 15 S512JP-EJ015: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 S512JP-EJ015

Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413JP-EK070T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413JP-EK070T

HP Envy 17-cg0033nf : Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.8 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg0033nf

Dell Inspiron 14 5406, i5-1135G7 MX330: Intel Core i5-1135G7, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 5406, i5-1135G7 MX330

Dell Vostro 15 5501: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Vostro 15 5501

Acer Aspire 3 A315-57G-59LG: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Acer Aspire 3 A315-57G-59LG

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon: Intel Core i7-1165G7, 13.30"
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Carbon

Dell Inspiron 15 5501-FV9G2: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 15.60", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 15 5501-FV9G2

Asus VivoBook 15 X512JP EJ228T: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 15.60", 1.8 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 15 X512JP EJ228T

Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook Ultra 14 K413

Asus Vivobook 14 A409JP-EK502T: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook 14 A409JP-EK502T

MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-870XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-870XES

Asus VivoBook 14 A413, i5-10210U MX330: Intel Core i5-10210U, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 A413, i5-10210U MX330

HP Envy x360 15-ed0900ng: Intel Core i7-10510U, 15.60", 1.9 kg
  External Review » HP Envy x360 15-ed0900ng

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 14.00"
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5i

Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IIL05-81X1001BGE: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IIL05-81X1001BGE

HP 17-by3268ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP 17-by3268ng

MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-1049XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-1049XES

MSI Modern 15 A10RAS-089XES: Intel Core i5-10210U, 15.60", 1.6 kg
  External Review » MSI Modern 15 A10RAS-089XES

HP 17-by3250ng: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 17.30", 2.4 kg
  External Review » HP 17-by3250ng

HP Envy 17-cg0001ng: Intel Core i5-1035G1, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg0001ng

HP Envy 17-cg0220ng: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17-cg0220ng

MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-871XES: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00"
  External Review » MSI Modern 14 A10RAS-871XES

Lenovo IdeaPad 3 17IML05-81WC0048GE: Intel Core i7-10510U, 17.30", 2.2 kg
  External Review » Lenovo IdeaPad 3 17IML05-81WC0048GE

HP Envy 17t-cg000: Intel Core i7-1065G7, 17.30", 2.7 kg
  External Review » HP Envy 17t-cg000

MSI Prestige 14 A10RC: Intel Core i7-10510U, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » MSI Prestige 14 A10RC

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter