Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Radeon R8 M445DX

AMD Radeon R8 M445DX

AMD Radeon R8 M445DX是由集成Radeon R5(Bristol Ridge,如A10-9600P)和独立的Radeon R7 M440的双显卡设置。它在2016年中旬推出,面向入门级的多媒体笔记本电脑。R8 M445DX运行于CrossFire模式下,两个显卡在AFR模式下交替呈现每一帧的游戏画面。因此,双显卡需要驱动设置为每个DX 11游戏正常工作提供支持,可能经常会受到微卡帧的影响。

Radeon R6提供了384个着色器核心,Radeon R7 M440提供了320个,它们都基于GCN架构。它们的技术规格和测试成绩可以在相应的页面上找到。

在我们的游戏测试中,双显卡设置的性能取决于驱动程序的支持。然而除了3DMark基准测试,我们几乎没有发现任何游戏可以在目前的驱动版本下从双显卡中获益。目前,消费者可以把R8 M445DX视作独立的R7 M440。

在闲置状态下,独立显卡会关闭以降低功耗,只有集成的R5会保持运行。同时运行时两块显卡的功耗将相加(5到10瓦加20到25瓦)。

Radeon R8 Series

Radeon R8 M365DX 768 @ 0.72 GHz128 + 64 Bit @ 800 / 1000 MHz
Radeon R8 M445DX 704 @ 0.72 GHz128 + 64 Bit @ 933 / 1000 MHz
ArchitectureGCN
Pipelines704 - unified
Core Speed720 / 1020 MHz
Memory Speed933 / 1000 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 + 64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3, DDR4
Shared Memoryno
APIDirectX 12, Shader 5.0, OpenGL 4.4
technology28 nm
FeaturesMantle, Vulkan
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement01.06.2016
InformationUVD 6

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - 3DMark 11 + Fire Strike + Time Spy
1 pt (3%)
AMD Radeon HD 8180
0.06605 -93%
...
0.909 -10%
0.91 -10%
NVIDIA Maxwell GPU Surface Book
0.945 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
0.959 -5%
AMD FirePro W5130M
0.961 -4%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
0.968 -4%
0.988 -2%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
0.991 -1%
1.002 0%
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
1.006
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
1.023 2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
1.035 3%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M
1.035 3%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
1.057 5%
AMD FirePro M5100
1.06 5%
1.062 6%
1.067 6%
1.068 6%
NVIDIA GeForce 845M
1.076 7%
...
21.1 1997%
max:
33.3 3210%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
315 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
281 Points (1%)
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -60%
...
194.5 -31%
AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
205 -27%
Intel HD Graphics 530
235 -16%
243.7 -13%
Intel UHD Graphics 615
244.7 -13%
254.5 -9%
255 -9%
Intel HD Graphics 520
263 -6%
AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)
274 -2%
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
281
Intel UHD Graphics 617
299 6%
312 11%
320 14%
328.8 17%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
329 17%
334 19%
Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
336.2 20%
343.7 22%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)
344.7 23%
...
19434 6816%
max:
36485 12884%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 66130     avg: 71829     median: 71829 (8%)     max: 77528 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 47091     avg: 51014     median: 51014 (7%)     max: 54937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
min: 5225     avg: 5721     median: 5667 (6%)     max: 6270 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
min: 12140     avg: 12333     median: 12377 (3%)     max: 12483 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 1644     avg: 1680     median: 1678 (3%)     max: 1718 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 2090     avg: 2178     median: 2209 (2%)     max: 2235 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 63360     avg: 64425     median: 64425 (8%)     max: 65490 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 2914     avg: 2962     median: 2979 (4%)     max: 2992 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 3697     avg: 3761     median: 3775 (3%)     max: 3811 Points
171.8 -95%
...
3535 -6%
AMD Radeon R7 M275DX
3553 -6%
3563 -5%
3581 -5%
3587 -5%
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
3588 -5%
3616 -4%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
3638 -3%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
3691 -2%
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
3761
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
3949 5%
3979 6%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
3996 6%
4070 8%
AMD Radeon 540X
4097 9%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
4146 10%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
4150 10%
4191 11%
AMD FirePro W5170M
4197 12%
...
59943 1494%
max:
106023 2719%
0%
100%
3DMark Vantage
3DM Vant. Perf. total +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. total
6853 Points (2%)
3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX +
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. GPU no PhysX
6770 Points (4%)
ATI Radeon HD 3200
62 -99%
...
6414 -5%
6451 -5%
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
6498 -4%
6557 -3%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M
6578 -3%
6661 -2%
6665 -2%
6673 -1%
6763 0%
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
6770
6846 1%
AMD Radeon R7 M260X
6931 2%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M
6943 3%
7015 4%
7078 5%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
7119 5%
7155 6%
7181 6%
AMD Radeon R8 M365DX
7243 7%
...
132443 1856%
max:
170928 2425%
0%
100%
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 +
3DMark 06
min: 8878     avg: 8881     median: 8880.5 (12%)     max: 8883 Points
Unigine Heaven 2.1 - Heaven 2.1 high
20.3 fps (4%)
0.6 -97%
...
NVIDIA GeForce 910M
18 -11%
AMD Radeon R5 M240
18.3 -10%
18.7 -8%
18.8 -7%
19.03 -6%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
19.4 -4%
19.5 -4%
AMD Radeon R7 M340
19.8 -2%
19.95 -2%
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
20.3
20.4 0%
20.93 3%
21.2 4%
21.2 4%
22 8%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M
22.1 9%
23.1 14%
23.35 15%
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
23.4 15%
...
532 2521%
0%
100%
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) +
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
min: 4769     avg: 5172     median: 5172 (4%)     max: 5575 points
Cinebench R11.5 Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 24.41     avg: 24.6     median: 24.6 (9%)     max: 24.74 fps
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64 Bit
min: 31.47     avg: 31.8     median: 31.8 (2%)     max: 32.05 fps
Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit +
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 OpenGL Ref. Match 64 Bit
98 % (98%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
25.3 fps (3%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
24.6 fps (1%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
28.4 fps (2%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 +
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
107.8 fps (1%)
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Room GPU
min: 356     avg: 361.5     median: 361.5 (2%)     max: 367 Samples/s
LuxMark v2.0 64Bit - LuxMark v2.0 Sala GPU
min: 669     avg: 696     median: 696 (1%)     max: 723 Samples/s
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
min: 1545     avg: 1557     median: 1556.5 (2%)     max: 1568 points
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
52.2 Watt (7%)
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 Power Consumption *
51.8 Watt (11%)
Emissions Witcher 3 Fan Noise +
Emissions - Witcher 3 Fan Noise
40.6 dB(A) (65%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1280x720
22.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Dirt 4

Dirt 4

2017
low 1280x720
47.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
18.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
73.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
31.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
9.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
For Honor

For Honor

2017
low 1280x720
28.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
40.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
16.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
13.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
63.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
21.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
31.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
36.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
15.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
10.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
21.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
18  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
26.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Doom

Doom

2016
low 1280x720
22.4  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
12.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x768
14.2  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
25.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
22.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
18.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
10.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
23  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
XCOM 2

XCOM 2

2016
low 1280x720
22  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
5.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
23.9 24.4 ~ 24 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.9 14.8 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.6 7.7 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
53.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
33.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
18  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.5  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
23.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
13.1  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
6.6  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Fallout 4

Fallout 4

2015
low 1280x720
24.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
15.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
8.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
38.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
26.2  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Anno 2205

Anno 2205

2015
low 1024x768
36  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
FIFA 16

FIFA 16

2015
low 1280x720
77.5  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
53.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
25  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1366x768
55.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.8  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
15.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
60  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
13.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Mad Max

Mad Max

2015
med. 1366x768
25.5  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.3  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
51  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
19  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
17  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
22.1 24.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
14.1 15.3 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
7.4  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
95.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
35.6  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
20.6  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
12.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
54.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
52.4  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
11.7  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
37.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
29.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
14  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1024x768
40.8  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
27.8  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.6  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
F1 2014

F1 2014

2014
low 1024x768
59  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
39  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
24  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
low 1024x768
51.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.7  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
28  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1280x720
33.3  fps    + Compare
med. 1344x756
21.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
12.2  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Sims 4

Sims 4

2014
low 1024x768
97.7  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
37.3  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
18.9  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.5  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
47.3 50.1 ~ 49 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
34.3 37.2 ~ 36 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
22.4 23.4 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.5 7.7 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» With most tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
32  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
25  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
16  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
7.8  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1280x720
72.7 74.6 ~ 74 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
42.7 42.9 ~ 43 fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
33.7 33.7 ~ 34 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11.4 11.7 ~ 12 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
low 1024x768
83.6  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.7  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
46.3  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
21.8  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
Crysis 3

Crysis 3

2013
low 1024x768
26.5  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
16.1  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
12.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
4.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
low 1024x768
82  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
77.8  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
71.7  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
50.3  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
73.9  fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
55.4  fps    + Compare
high 1366x768
45  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
27.9  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings high.
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Playerunknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG)22.3
Dirt 447.618.5
Rocket League73.731.218.6
Mass Effect Andromeda9.8
For Honor28.910.5
Resident Evil 740.716.4
Dishonored 213.8
Farming Simulator 1763.821.6
Battlefield 131.27.9
Civilization VI36.89.7
Deus Ex Mankind Divided15.110.95.4
No Man's Sky21.81810
Mirror's Edge Catalyst26.412.85.8
Doom22.412.88.3
Ashes of the Singularity14.276.2
Need for Speed 201625.622.611.79.5
Hitman 201618.617.710.5
The Division23.315.17.1
Far Cry Primal23109
XCOM 22285.2
Rise of the Tomb Raider24148
Rainbow Six Siege53.533.713.3
Just Cause 31817.411.5
Star Wars Battlefront3623.111.39.9
Assassin's Creed Syndicate15.913.16.6
Fallout 424.915.98.4
Call of Duty: Black Ops 338.126.211.7
Anno 22053617.87.4
FIFA 1677.553.825
World of Warships55.542.722.815.3
Metal Gear Solid V6037.513.3
Mad Max25.511.3
Dota 2 Reborn512320.6
Batman: Arkham Knight19177
The Witcher 323157.4
Dirt Rally95.535.620.612.5
GTA V54.652.411.7
Battlefield Hardline37.729.3148.3
Dragon Age: Inquisition40.827.89.6
F1 201459423924
Alien: Isolation51.642.728
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor33.321.312.2
Sims 497.737.318.916.5
Battlefield 44936238
Metro: Last Light3225167.8
BioShock Infinite74433412
Tomb Raider83.655.746.321.8
Crysis 326.516.112.74.1
Counter-Strike: GO8277.871.750.3
Diablo III73.955.44527.9
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
21
18
10
28
13
1
38
5
1
15
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.26
log 24. 17:24:55

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 22 Apr 2024 05:40:21 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.032s ... 0.033s

#4 composed specs +0s ... 0.033s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.033s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.033s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 7341 +0.022s ... 0.055s

#8 got single benchmarks 7341 +0.012s ... 0.067s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.067s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +0.551s ... 0.619s

#11 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.619s

#12 Got 164 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.628s

#13 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.628s

#14 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.031s ... 0.659s

#15 benchmarks composed for output. +1.305s ... 1.964s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.003s ... 1.968s

#17 return log +0s ... 1.968s

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *

Class 3

Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

UHD Graphics 730
Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics (Broadwell)
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

Class 5

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter