Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100

Qualcomm SD X Plus X1P-64-100

Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100是一种 ARM 架构处理器(SoC),用于 Windows 笔记本电脑,于 2024 年 4 月首次亮相。X1P-64-100 有 10 个 Oryon CPU 内核(6 个 P 核和 4 个 E 核),运行频率不超过 3.4 GHz。其他主要功能包括 3.8 TFLOPS Adreno GPU、45 TOPS Hexagon NPU 和速度惊人的 LPDDR5x-8448 内存控制器。

该芯片更智能的 X Elite 系列兄弟产品首先包括 骁龙 X 精英 X1E-84-100采用相同的芯片、相同的 GPU 和 NPU,但 CPU 内核更多,CPU 内核和 iGPU 的时钟速度更高,功耗目标也可能更高。

架构和功能

据说高通 Oryon 内核基于 ARM v8.7 微体系结构。与现代 AMD 和英特尔处理器一样,骁龙芯片兼容 USB 4,因此也兼容 Thunderbolt 4;至于 X Plus 是否兼容GeForce 或 Radeon 独立显卡,我们拭目以待。

据说高通 SoC 有 12 个 PCIe 4 和 4 个 PCIe 3 通道,可连接各种设备。支持 NVMe SSD,吞吐量高达 7.9 GB/s;此外,围绕该芯片打造的大多数笔记本电脑预计将配备 16 GB LPDDR5X-8448 内存。此外,还有一个 45 TOPS NPU,用于加速人工智能工作负载。

性能

如果官方提供的性能数据能说明问题,那么 X Plus 的性能应该比 9 核Apple M4在多线程工作负载方面要慢得多,同时也更耗电。一旦获得内部测试结果,我们将确保及时更新本节内容。

与其他基于 ARM 的 Windows 平台一样,骁龙 X 芯片在使用专为 ARM 处理器编译的应用程序和游戏时效果最佳,但目前这样的应用程序和游戏还不多。

图形

集成的 Adreno GPU应该与 DirectX 12 兼容(不是与 DirectX 12 Ultimate 兼容;正如传言所说,这里没有任何光线追踪功能)。据说它还能提供高达 3.8 TFLOPS 的性能。作为参考,用于笔记本电脑的最慢专业 Nvidia Ada 代显卡 RTX 500 Ada 可提供高达 9.2 TFLOPS 的性能。

高通 iGPU 可让您同时使用多达 3 台 UHD 2160p 显示器。支持 2160p120 集成显示器,以及流行的 AV1、HEVC 和 AVC 视频编解码器(包括解码和编码)。

功耗

X1P-64-100 的功耗很可能低于其功能更强大的 X Elite 兄弟。在长期工作负载下,预计功耗在 10 W 到 35 W 之间,因为这就是 Ryzen U 芯片的正常功耗。

该 SoC 采用 4 纳米台积电工艺制造,节能效果不错(截至 2024 年上半年)。

SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon X
CodenameOryon

Series: Snapdragon X Oryon

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE3.8 - 4.3 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-1003.8 - 4.2 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 - 4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 - 3.4 GHz12 / 12 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 « - 3.4 GHz10 / 10 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-100 - 4 GHz8 / 8 cores Oryon
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 - 3.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Oryon
Clock Rate <=3400 MHz
Number of Cores / Threads10 / 10
10 x 3.4 GHz Qualcomm Oryon
Manufacturing Technology4 nm
GPUQualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
64 Bit64 Bit support
ArchitectureARM
Announcement Date04/24/2024
Product Link (external)www.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
31.2 pt (51%)
AMD E1-2100
2.35 -92%
...
30.4 -3%
30.5 -2%
30.6 -2%
30.6 -2%
Intel Core i7-8559U
30.7 -2%
30.7 -2%
31 -1%
31.1 0%
31.1 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
31.2
31.2 0%
31.3 0%
31.4 1%
31.5 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
31.5 1%
Intel Xeon E-2276M
31.6 1%
31.7 2%
31.8 2%
32 3%
...
47.9 54%
max:
60.6 94%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
1129 Points (48%)
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -93%
...
Intel Core i7-8850H
1096 -3%
1113 -1%
1115 -1%
1119 -1%
Intel Core i5-1035G4
1119 -1%
1119 -1%
1125 0%
1126 0%
Intel Core i5-8400H
1128 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
1129
Intel Core i7-1065G7
1131 0%
1142 1%
1145 1%
1152 2%
1152 2%
1160 3%
1163 3%
1171 4%
1172 4%
...
2017 79%
max:
Intel Core i9-14900
2212 96%
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
420 Points (47%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3252 Points (8%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1989 Points (13%)
AMD A4-1200
31 -98%
...
1913 -4%
1913 -4%
1927 -3%
1946 -2%
1946 -2%
1968 -1%
1968 -1%
1983 0%
1987 0%
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100
1989
1992 0%
2019 2%
2052 3%
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS
2053 3%
2055 3%
2068 4%
2069 4%
2079 5%
AMD Ryzen 9 5980HS
2083 5%
...
5600 182%
max:
15842 696%
0%
100%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
2.2 Points (54%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2661 points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
17854 points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
242.1 s (3%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
8.1 s (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
37289 MIPS (21%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
6.5 fps (11%)
0123456789101112Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
751 Seconds (10%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
402 Seconds (3%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
0.7 sec (16%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.5 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
37.5 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
873 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
13595 Points (37%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
16496 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
4652 Points (20%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
460.8 ms (1%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1216 Points (47%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
40.6 Watt (7%)
0510152025303540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
5.3 Watt (4%)
0123456Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4 Watt (4%)
00.20.50.711.21.41.71.92.22.42.72.93.13.43.63.94.14.34.6Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
49 Points per Watt (37%)
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.28
log 02. 17:04:46

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 01 Oct 2024 05:31:39 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.012s ... 0.013s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.014s

#10 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.015s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.015s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 17589 +0.017s ... 0.032s

#13 got single benchmarks 17589 +0.01s ... 0.043s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.632s ... 0.674s

#16 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.674s

#17 return log +0s ... 0.674s

Reviews for the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 processor

微软 Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ 评测--基本机型配备 IPS 显示屏和骁龙 X Plus

微软 Surface Pro IPS Copilot+ 评测--基本机型配备 IPS 显示屏和骁龙 X Plus

新款 Surface Pro 11 的基本型号采用了 IPS 显示屏和据称速度较慢的骁龙 X Plus 处理器。实际上,你并不会注意到性能的降低,但由于使用的是 ARM 版本的 Windows 操作系统,一些限制因素依然存在。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 13.00" | 872 g

Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 14.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7441

Acer Swift Go 14 SF14-11: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 14.50", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift Go 14 SF14-11

Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-11: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 14.50", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 14 AI SF14-11

Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+: Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro Copilot+

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Snapdragon X

» Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-00-1DE
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.3 GHz
» Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-84-100
   12x 3.8 GHz - 4.2 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen 5 7545U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 7540U
   6x 3.2 GHz - 4.9 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.55 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 6600HS
   6x 3.3 GHz - 4.5 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 4900H
   8x 3.3 GHz - 4.4 GHz
- Intel Core i9-10980HK
   8x 2.4 GHz - 5.3 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
   8x 2.8 GHz - 4.4 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
   8x 3 GHz - 4.3 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Qualcomm Snapdragon X Snapdragon X Plus X1P-64-100 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-06-21)