纤薄的华硕ROG Flow X16笔记本电脑评测：强大的16英寸游戏工作站二合一，带触摸屏

Name: Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V
Brand: Asus

一款纤细的游戏板块。 去年，轻薄的ROG Flow X16是我们第一台配备迷你LED显示屏的游戏笔记本电脑。在视觉上，这款二合一产品没有什么变化。然而，内部结构有些沉睡，采用了英特尔猛禽湖和Geforce RTX 4060。这些新变化意味着什么？请继续阅读，我们将解释一切。

Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/15/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Convertible / 2-in-1 Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake

去年，ROG Flow X16是我们第一台配备迷你LED显示屏的游戏笔记本。在那个时候，这款笔记本电脑已经领先于它的时代，为此，华硕似乎没有理由给这个模型进行彻底的改造。然而，我们在这里评测的版本没有配备迷你LED显示屏。然而，许多功能保持不变，如外壳和端口，华硕只切换了CPU/GPU的世代。

同样，华硕目前在实现新概念方面也走在了前面，这一点从新的华硕ROG Ally以及华硕ROG Flow Z13游戏平板电脑。X16不完全是你的日常设备：我们在这里得到的是一个超薄的游戏笔记本电脑，同时也是一个二合一的产品。显示器可以360度旋转，允许笔记本电脑通过触摸屏作为平板电脑使用。由于很难有直接的竞争，这就是为什么我们要把它与普通游戏机进行比较。除了它的前辈，我们还在使用三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16，以及联想Legion Pro 5，以及联想Yoga Pro 7 14 G8和MSI Katana 17 B13V进行比较。

由于在去年的模型中发现的各种功能保持不变，我们并没有特别关注机箱、配件、服务和输入设备，而是更倾向于向你指出我们对去年的审查方向华硕ROG Flow X16 GV601RW，了解更多信息。

Test device courtesy of Caseking

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V (ROG Flow X16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 135 W PL2 / Short Burst, 110 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 120 W TDP ( including 20 W Dynamic Boost), Advanced Optimus, MUX

Memory

16 GB

, 2x 8 GB Micron DDR5-4800

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, yes, native pen support, TMX1603 (TL160ADMP03-0), IPS, ROG Nebula HDR Display, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB

, 860 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 Docking Station Port, Audio Connections: Headset, Card Reader: microSD

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19.4 x 355 x 243

Battery

90 Wh Lithium-Ion

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080P FHD IR camera for Windows Hello
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4-speaker system with Smart Amplifier Technology, Keyboard: Backlit Chiclet Keyboard 1-Zone RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, ROG backpack, ROG Fusion II 300, ROG Gladius III Mouse P514, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.089 kg, Power Supply: 725 g

Price

2599 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.7 %	06/2023	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.5 %	08/2022	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.4 mm	16.10"	2560x1600
88.8 %	05/2023	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	16.8 mm	16.00"	2880x1800
87.9 %	05/2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	26.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
90.2 %	05/2023	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.5 kg	15.6 mm	14.50"	3072x1920
82.1 %	02/2023	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	25.2 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

案例 - 和去年一样苗条和优秀

箱盖上的标志略有不同，但除此之外，一切基本没有变化。

尺寸比较

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 DIN A4 ❌

特点 - TB4和XG移动接口

左：DC-in、HDMI 2.1、带PD和DP的Thunderbolt4/USB-C、带USB Type-C 3.2 Gen2的ROG XG移动接口

SD卡阅读器

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	158 MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	109.5 (97.05^min - 110.22^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)	98.4 MB/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s -30%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	257.13 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	182.7 MB/s -29%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)	121.3 MB/s -53%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	85.6 MB/s -67%

沟通

在6GHz网络中，使用英特尔AX211的传输速率非常高且稳定（约1.6MBit/s），而在5GHz网络中，低传输速率只有约1MBit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1412 (701^min - 1560^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1003 - 1501, n=4)	1320 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (885 - 1412, n=4, last 2 years)	1139 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1700 (855^min - 1725^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (1178 - 1623, n=4)	1409 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (881 - 1700, n=4, last 2 years)	1379 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1582 (1163^min - 1661^max) MBit/s +72%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1569 (1259^min - 1667^max) MBit/s +71%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1348 (1296^min, 1296.87^P1 - 1385^max) MBit/s +47%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)	1272 MBit/s +38%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1861, n=188)	1242 MBit/s +35%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	920 (471^min - 966^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	802 (579^min - 1120^max) MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1675 (1509^min - 1726^max) MBit/s +85%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1570 (1556^min - 1582^max) MBit/s +73%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1541 (1426^min, 1427.45^P1 - 1639^max) MBit/s +70%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)	1403 MBit/s +55%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=188)	1392 MBit/s +54%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1223 (1136^min - 1272^max) MBit/s +35%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	905 (451^min - 919^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1595 (801^min - 1642^max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1522 (1100^min - 1614^max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=77, last 2 years)	1477 MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=174)	1369 MBit/s -14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1304 (980^min - 1390^max) MBit/s -18%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1628 (1598^min - 1648^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1857, n=79, last 2 years)	1516 MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (883 - 1857, n=173)	1488 MBit/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1462 (1430^min - 1493^max) MBit/s -10%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1271 (526^min - 1527^max) MBit/s -22%

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1568 (801-1642)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1522 (1100-1614)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1304 (980-1390)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1627 (1598-1648)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1271 (526-1527)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1462 (1430-1493)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (471-966)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1163-1661)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (579-1120)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø890 (451-919)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1569 (1556-1582)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1223 (1136-1272)

网络摄像头

在这一领域，华硕将去年机型中的720p摄像头升级为全高清摄像头。图像还不错，但色彩偏差有些偏高。

ColorChecker Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V: 21.45 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 32.61 ∆E

安全问题

由于采用了英特尔芯片，TPM是可用的，然而，指纹传感器甚至是肯辛顿锁都没有发挥作用。该相机与Windows Hello兼容。

辅料

不幸的是，今年不包括手写笔，理论上，你收到的是一台没有任何额外配件的笔记本电脑。然而，根据包装，ROG品牌的笔记本电脑背包、ROG Fusion II 300耳机以及ROG Gladius III鼠标都包括在内。

输入设备 - X16有一个大的触摸板

显示屏 - 有或没有迷你LED？

X16采用了16英寸的华硕TMX1603或TL160ADMP03-0 IPS面板，具有触摸屏功能，但没有迷你LED。同样的面板，尽管是非触摸的变体，也可以在华硕ROG Strix G16 。这是一个16:10格式的2560 x 1600像素的显示屏，支持手写笔输入。遗憾的是，与去年包含手写笔的情况不同，今年必须单独购买。

另外，与去年一样，也可以选择带有迷你LED背光的面板，这一点已经得到了进一步的改进：调光区的数量增加了一倍，达到1024个，刷新率从165增加到240赫兹，峰值亮度稍微增加到1100尼特（HDR）。不幸的是，迷你LED面板(在此回顾)只适用于 RTX 4070或更高规格的型号，因此没有出现在我们的审查模型中。

然而，华硕网站给人的印象是，所有型号都有迷你LED显示屏--即使是RTX 4050和RTX 4060的型号。因此，在购买时要密切注意!

但是，即使没有迷你LED，我们的标准型号测得的平均亮度约为469尼特，照明度达到了非常好的91%。黑电平为可接受的0.39，对比度为1,246:1。

响应时间非常快，不需要担心PWM的问题，而且背光渗漏非常小，只在顶部边缘可见。


446 cd/m²	462 cd/m²	442 cd/m²
480 cd/m²	486 cd/m²	474 cd/m²
482 cd/m²	481 cd/m²	471 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

TMX1603 (TL160ADMP03-0) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 486 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 469.3 cd/m² Minimum: 26.3 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 487 cd/m²
Contrast: 1246:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.27 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.36 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
84.63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.92% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.61% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V TMX1603 (TL160ADMP03-0), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AUO B160QAN02.S, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.10	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung SDC4185 ATNA60CL03-0, OLED / AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 LEN145-3K, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK B173HAN04.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		3%	4%	-13%	2%	-49%
Display P3 Coverage	96.61	99.82 3%	95.3 -1%	71.2 -26%	98.7 2%	40.8 -58%
sRGB Coverage	99.92	99.99 0%	99.1 -1%	98.8 -1%	100 0%	61 -39%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	84.63	90.21 7%	97.4 15%	73.3 -13%	87.6 4%	42.2 -50%
Response Times		-117%	61%	-160%	-419%	-505%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	3.8 ?(1.8, 2)	11 ?(1, 10) -189%	2 ?(1, 1) 47%	14.5 ?(7, 7.5) -282%	31.5 ?(14.5, 17) -729%	33 ?(16, 17) -768%
Response Time Black / White *	7.6 ?(4, 3.6)	11 ?(1, 10) -45%	2 ?(1, 1) 74%	10.4 ?(5.7, 4.7) -37%	15.8 ?(5.4, 10.4) -108%	26 ?(13, 13) -242%
PWM Frequency		7400 ?(100)	250 ?(70)
Screen		16%	2%	8%	26%	-111%
Brightness middle	486	498 2%	403 -17%	405.7 -17%	441 -9%	267 -45%
Brightness	469	502 7%	408 -13%	368 -22%	453 -3%	256 -45%
Brightness Distribution	91	94 3%	98 8%	87 -4%	92 1%	93 2%
Black Level *	0.39	0.11 72%		0.38 3%	0.34 13%	0.21 46%
Contrast	1246	4527 263%		1068 -14%	1297 4%	1271 2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.27	1.87 18%	2.63 -16%	1.65 27%	0.6 74%	4.7 -107%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.73	6.15 -7%	4.07 29%	4.2 27%	1.3 77%	20.4 -256%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.6	1.94 -223%		0.53 12%	0.6 -0%	4.5 -650%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.36	3.15 6%	2.69 20%	1.2 64%	0.8 76%	1.5 55%
Gamma	2.46 ^89%	330.95 ^1%	2.48 ^89%	2.3 ^96%	2.2 ^100%	2.12 ^104%
CCT	6625 ^98%	7294 ^89%	6907 ^94%	6453 ^101%	6597 ^99%	6552 ^99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-33% / -6%	22% / 13%	-55% / -20%	-130% / -43%	-222% / -154%

* ... smaller is better

华硕宣传该设备具有100%的DCI P3，我们测量了大约97%。AdobeRGB的覆盖率约为85%，sRGB则完全覆盖。

为了获得更好的色彩准确性，将X16的亮度降低到50%左右是有帮助的。随后，灰度DeltaE从3.36提高到只有2。此外，ColorChecker的DeltaE进一步下降。使用i1Profiler进行新的校准其实是没有意义的。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4 ms rise
7.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.8 ms rise
3.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

在户外，非常高的亮度在阳光直射和阴暗处都有帮助。从广角看，光亮的触摸屏显示阻碍了观看体验。

性能 - 强大的华硕平板电脑

所有配置都有Core i9-13900H的共同点。这可以选择与一个RTX 4050, RTX 4060或 RTX 4070.根据该网站，配备这两块较弱的显卡的SKU只配备8GB内存，RTX 4070的配置为16GB。然而，我们的评测单元配备了RTX 4060和16GB的内存。看起来，华硕可能在这里升级了我们的评测模型。除此以外，该设备可以配备高达64GB的内存。

测试条件

华硕游戏笔记本总是有两个来自制造商的预装应用程序，几乎有点让人联想到臃肿的软件。MyAsus负责处理支持问题，而Armory Crate则负责控制中心，而且不幸的是，现在的习惯是收集数据。该应用程序还不是特别成熟，尤其是在翻译方面。不断有缺失或被切断的部分。此外，该应用程序有时会在启动时自动更新，这意味着用户必须等待很长时间才能访问诸如性能模式之类的东西--这很烦人!

一共有四种性能模式（Windows、安静、性能、涡轮、手动）。为了获得最佳的基准测试结果，我们选择了涡轮增压。然而，我们仍然介绍了通过使用其他模式获得的所有结果。你还可以在这里找到MUX开关，换句话说，就是iGPU和dGPU之间的切换。

处理器

尽管外壳很薄，但X16装有一个英特尔酷睿i9-13900H。这款高端猛禽湖CPU有6个P核和8个E核，可以从1.9GHz（E核基本时钟速度）运行到5.4GHz（单核涡轮增压）。

由于较新的H系列与桤木湖系列相比几乎没有任何变化，所以X16无法从去年的竞争中脱颖而出并不令人惊讶。联想Legion Pro 7拥有HX-CPU的联想Pro 7在这里处于一个不同的行列。然而，令人印象深刻的是，尽管外形纤细，但得分比我们数据库中的i9-13900H平均分高出整整10%。

在最初的两到三次运行后，该数值有所下降。下面，你可以发现CPU的TDP取决于所选择的性能模式，尽管这些数值更多是理论上的（HWinfo）。因此，即使在CinebenchR15中使用涡轮模式，CPU的功耗也几乎不超过100瓦，在安静模式下运行时，TDP下降到60瓦以下。

在电池模式下，会自动选择安静模式。涡轮增压被阻止了，但理论上你仍然可以打开电源。

Leistungsmodus/TDP der CPU	PL1	PL2	Score
Turbo	110	135	3.100
Leistung	100	120	2.882
Leise	80	100	2.342
Akku Leistung	38	60	2.199
奖学金	30	30	1.604

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2665 (2515.25-3099.81)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS; @Turbo Mode: Ø2279 (2140.75-2332.5)

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H: Ø2295 (2246.31-2349.07)

Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2671 (2637.65-2778.36)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2304 (2277.39-2359.33)

Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS: Ø2152 (2123.71-2170.49)

MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2720 (2672.55-2894.15)

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2914 (2871.5-3068.66)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4574 (4429.68-4819.28)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	85.6 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	67 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	66.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max ^-6! Apple M2 Max	64.4 pt
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	63.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	61.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	60.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	58.7 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	54.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	53.2 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	53 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	48.6 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	48.3 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	30162 Points +56%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=234, last 2 years)	19653 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	19469 (17696.3^min - 19468.6^max) Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	19293 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	18444 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	17994 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (13177 - 20385, n=25)	17182 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	15496 Points -20%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	14767 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	14584 (14179.8^min - 14584.2^max) Points -24%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	14403 Points -25%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	13445 Points -30%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2043 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	2016 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	1974 Points -2%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	1921 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=23)	1906 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=232, last 2 years)	1819 Points -10%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	1805 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	1758 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	1625 Points -19%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1614 Points -20%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1554 Points -23%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1526 Points -24%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	11500 Points +54%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	7491 Points
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=232, last 2 years)	7470 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	7411 Points -1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	6950 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	6789 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4960 - 7716, n=22)	6689 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points -20%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	5905 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5596 Points -25%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5552 Points -26%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5152 Points -31%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	4044 Points -46%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	788 Points +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	773 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	751 Points -3%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	738 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=22)	727 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=232, last 2 years)	701 Points -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	693 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	671 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	630 Points -18%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	599 Points -23%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	596 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	460 Points -40%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	4819 (4429.68^min - 4819.28^max) Points +55%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=237, last 2 years)	3111 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	3100 (2515.25^min - 3099.81^max) Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	3069 (2871.5^min - 3068.66^max) Points -1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	2894 (2672.55^min - 2894.15^max) Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	2778 (2637.65^min - 2778.36^max) Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=23)	2713 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2359 (2277.39^min - 2359.33^max) Points -24%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	2349 (2246.31^min - 2349.07^max) Points -24%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2333 (2140.75^min - 2332.5^max) Points -25%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	2161 Points -30%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	2074 (2068.47^min, 2068.57^P1 - 2081.27^max) Points -33%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	292 Points +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	287 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	275 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=23)	272 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=236, last 2 years)	269 Points -6%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	258 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	257 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	253 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	245 Points -15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	241 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	239 Points -17%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	227 Seconds * -26%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	224 Seconds * -24%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds * -22%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	215 Seconds * -19%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	214 Seconds * -19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=21)	200 Seconds * -11%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)	198.5 Seconds * -10%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	190.3 Seconds * -6%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	182 Seconds * -1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	180 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	166 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	105 Seconds * +42%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	122254 MIPS +65%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	79032 MIPS +7%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=231, last 2 years)	77566 MIPS +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	74123 MIPS
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	72610 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=22)	67692 MIPS -9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	65564 MIPS -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS -14%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	63347 MIPS -15%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	62324 MIPS -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62024 MIPS -16%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	62006 MIPS -16%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	7035 MIPS +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	6285 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	6245 MIPS -1%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=231, last 2 years)	6142 MIPS -2%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	6120 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=22)	6079 MIPS -3%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	6070 MIPS -3%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5805 MIPS -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	5742 MIPS -9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	5680 MIPS -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	5453 MIPS -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS -15%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	21058 Points +51%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	15410 Points +11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	15348 Points +10%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	14376 Points +3%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	13919 Points
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years)	13658 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=22)	12803 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	12524 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	11289 Points -19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10040 Points -28%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10007 Points -28%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	9224 Points -34%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2025 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	1996 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max Apple M2 Max	1978 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	1974 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=22)	1909 Points -4%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	1886 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years)	1813 Points -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	1793 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	1725 Points -14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points -17%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1642 Points -18%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1537 Points -23%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	1481 Points -26%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	31.9 fps +49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	21.7 fps +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	21.4 fps
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=234, last 2 years)	21.3 fps 0%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	18.9 fps -12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.7 - 22.3, n=22)	18.9 fps -12%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	18.7 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	18.3 fps -14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	17.1 fps -20%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.8 fps -21%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	16.2 fps -24%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	57.2 s * -50%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	56.8 s * -49%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	56.1 s * -47%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s * -33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	50.5 s * -33%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=229, last 2 years)	49.3 s * -29%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	48.9 s * -28%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=22)	48.5 s * -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	44 s * -15%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	40 s * -5%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	39 s * -2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	38.1 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec * -21%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.5 sec * -20%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	0.4897 sec * -18%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4716 sec * -13%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=231, last 2 years)	0.4679 sec * -12%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.4636 sec * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=22)	0.4493 sec * -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H	0.4438 sec * -7%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H	0.432 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4165 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H	0.412 sec * +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3979 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3100 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

227 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

287 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming	93.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	89.4 pt
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	89.1 pt
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	87.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	86.1 pt
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	84.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	81.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	76.3 pt
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	68.7 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	66 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=227, last 2 years)	18693 KRay/s +42%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	16445 KRay/s +25%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	16064 KRay/s +22%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	15934 KRay/s +21%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	15798 KRay/s +20%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=22)	15528 KRay/s +18%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13601 KRay/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s +3%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13150 KRay/s
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	8552 KRay/s -35%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	103791 Points +20%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	102881 Points +19%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	99931 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=227, last 2 years)	93857 Points +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	86318 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	82001 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=22)	77877 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points -17%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67187 Points -22%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40242 Points -53%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=227, last 2 years)	4348 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4245 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	3912 MB/s -8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=22)	3642 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3614 MB/s -15%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	3579 MB/s -16%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	3410 MB/s -20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s -20%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	3021 MB/s -29%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2773 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	111227 Points
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=227, last 2 years)	109886 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	107544 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=22)	107083 Points -4%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	106489 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points -5%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	105203 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	104030 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	102769 Points -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	78352 Points -30%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	13039 Points +18%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	12977 Points +17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	12905 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=227, last 2 years)	12226 Points +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11072 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	10146 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	9911 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=22)	9841 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	8421 Points -24%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	56836 Points +32%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	56486 Points +32%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	54778 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=227, last 2 years)	48017 Points +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	42925 Points
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	40117 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=22)	38588 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points -21%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	32787 Points -24%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	23330 Points -46%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	142686 MB/s +70%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	139251 MB/s +66%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	137177 MB/s +64%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	135448 MB/s +61%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=227, last 2 years)	108279 MB/s +29%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	103426 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=22)	84032 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	83870 MB/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	58525 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1221 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=227, last 2 years)	1218 MB/s 0%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	1193 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=22)	1066 MB/s -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s -13%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	1025 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	888 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	870 MB/s -29%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	866 MB/s -29%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	818 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=227, last 2 years)	10121 KRay/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	9686 KRay/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	8981 KRay/s -7%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	8965 KRay/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	8596 KRay/s -11%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	8438 KRay/s -13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=22)	8424 KRay/s -13%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	7364 KRay/s -24%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s -25%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	4940 KRay/s -49%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=22)	40521 MPixel/s +6%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU	40363 MPixel/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38385 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=228, last 2 years)	36915 MPixel/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU	35101 MPixel/s -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s -11%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	34544 MPixel/s -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, Radeon RX 6800M	29687 MPixel/s -23%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	29413 MPixel/s -23%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6800S	28697 MPixel/s -25%

系统性能

在PCMark10测试中，X16的表现与预期相同，甚至比预期好一点。在我们的任何分项测试中都没有出现异常值或下降。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8277 Points +5%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8083 Points +3%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7884 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7830 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7578 - 7884, n=3)	7696 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	7669 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)	7592 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	7380 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points -7%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7208 Points -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7160 Points -9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6860 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11703 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11659 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11539 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (11235 - 11539, n=3)	11424 Points -1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11019 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	10812 Points -6%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10809 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)	10731 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	10712 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points -10%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9970 Points -14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9758 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11186 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11046 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10788 Points +6%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10222 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (9888 - 10222, n=3)	10053 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	9876 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)	9725 Points -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9632 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	9433 Points -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9308 Points -9%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8983 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11949 Points +6%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11626 Points +3%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	11572 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)	11476 Points +2%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11350 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11272 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (10418 - 11272, n=3)	10774 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	10696 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10319 Points -8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	9903 Points -12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	9322 Points -17%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1972 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1956 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1874 - 1983, n=3)	1938 Points -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1910 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)	1881 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1865 Points -5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1857 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1722 Points -12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1661 Points -15%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1415 Points -28%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1859 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1845 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1779 - 1889, n=3)	1842 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)	1791 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1790 Points -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1765 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1681 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1618 Points -13%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1609 Points -13%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1379 Points -26%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	2505 Points +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2233 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2157 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (2104 - 2195, n=3)	2152 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)	2046 Points -5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2013 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1962 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points -13%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1828 Points -15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1795 Points -17%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1599 Points -26%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1814 Points +7%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1734 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)	1704 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1698 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1658 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (1548 - 1698, n=3)	1645 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 Radeon RX 6800S, R9 6900HX, SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N	1549 Points -9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1449 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M2 Max M2 Max 38-Core GPU, M2 Max, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1395 Points -18%
Corsair Voyager a1600 Radeon RX 6800M, R9 6900HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1060 Points -38%

PCMark 10 Score		7884 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71608 MB/s +18%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	64736 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=22)	62955 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	60600 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=227, last 2 years)	59613 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	58458 MB/s -4%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	53391 MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	49150 MB/s -19%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70526 MB/s +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68847 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	68205 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	67644 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=227, last 2 years)	63575 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=22)	63423 MB/s -7%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61613 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	51041 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88505 MB/s +46%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	70038 MB/s +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=22)	66548 MB/s +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	65896 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=227, last 2 years)	61792 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	60748 MB/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55102 MB/s -9%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	50700 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	103.5 ns * -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	101.7 ns * -10%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	101.7 ns * -10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.2 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	92.3 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (82.3 - 102.3, n=22)	90.2 ns * +2%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=224, last 2 years)	87.2 ns * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	81.9 ns * +11%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

当打开多个浏览器标签时，该软件显示了LatencyMon的延迟。然而，我们的4K/60fps YouTube视频运行平稳，没有任何丢帧。尽管如此，分数可能会低一点，特别是对于目标内容创作者群体。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2501 μs * -107%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2396.6 μs * -98%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1210.9 μs *
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	1194.1 μs * +1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	925.8 μs * +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	869.7 μs * +28%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

华硕安装了一块来自西部数据的1TB PCIe-4.0-x4-NVMe SSD。再一次，该存储驱动器发现自己在我们的底部附近固态硬盘的最佳列表.前一个型号的美光固态硬盘的平均速度明显快了约42%!

当然，对于家庭使用来说，这款固态硬盘的速度已经足够快了，但是对于专业用户来说--X16的目标用户类别--这种性能上的倒退有点令人感到遗憾。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4993 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3357 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 590 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 527 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 166.9 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 515 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1092 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	86.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	80.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.9 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.1 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	66.8 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	62.9 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	56.5 pt
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	53.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5346 (4832.89^min - 5346.06^max) MB/s +65%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4195 (4171.24^min - 4194.51^max) MB/s +30%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3626 (3582.77^min - 3626.19^max) MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)	3539 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3234 (3155.56^min - 3234.47^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2406 - 4093, n=10)	3233 MB/s 0%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2617 (2498.58^min - 2616.63^max) MB/s -19%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2578 (2552.79^min - 2578.03^max) MB/s -20%
seq write
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4780 (3934.47^min - 4779.5^max) MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)	3829 MB/s +28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3440 (3380.56^min - 3439.75^max) MB/s +15%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3115 (2904.62^min - 3115.38^max) MB/s +4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3001 (2867.51^min - 3000.61^max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2997 (2930.15^min - 2996.92^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2235 - 3416, n=10)	2957 MB/s -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1495 (1277.34^min - 1495.48^max) MB/s -50%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7127 (6535.15^min - 7127.37^max) MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	6694 (5547.2^min - 6693.9^max) MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)	6390 MB/s +29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6319 (4997.38^min - 6318.51^max) MB/s +28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6067 (5416.73^min - 6067.48^max) MB/s +23%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4940 MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3728 - 5023, n=10)	4865 MB/s -2%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4719 (4052.12^min - 4719.01^max) MB/s -4%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5030 (5013.03^min - 5029.6^max) MB/s +58%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4982 (4649.6^min - 4981.68^max) MB/s +56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4903 (812.65^min - 4902.98^max) MB/s +54%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4896 (4825.13^min - 4896.28^max) MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)	4818 MB/s +51%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3629 MB/s +14%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2957 - 3429, n=10)	3236 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3185 (3154.12^min - 3184.87^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.4 (79.86^min - 81.36^max) MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)	67.9 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	66.7 (66.39^min - 66.66^max) MB/s +3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	65.9 (62.88^min - 65.94^max) MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	64.7 (63.36^min - 64.73^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (47.2 - 64.7, n=10)	57.1 MB/s -12%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	56.6 (49.97^min - 56.58^max) MB/s -13%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	37.7 (37.23^min - 37.65^max) MB/s -42%
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	328 (300.52^min - 328.36^max) MB/s +92%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	286 (269.48^min - 285.84^max) MB/s +68%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)	224 MB/s +31%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (118.5 - 259, n=10)	178.5 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	170.6 (167.61^min - 170.59^max) MB/s
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	165.9 (160.41^min - 165.89^max) MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	159.1 (155.4^min - 159.1^max) MB/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	142.8 (136.31^min - 142.75^max) MB/s -16%
4k q32 t16 read
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3881 (3739.98^min - 3881.41^max) MB/s +410%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2889 (2819.64^min - 2889.22^max) MB/s +280%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2859 (2841.54^min - 2858.59^max) MB/s +276%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2769 MB/s +264%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)	2590 MB/s +240%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (604 - 1533, n=10)	1061 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1006 (1000.34^min - 1005.79^max) MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	761 (749.41^min - 760.62^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2679 (2487.07^min - 2678.86^max) MB/s +414%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2635 (2459.5^min - 2634.95^max) MB/s +406%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2597 (2546.61^min - 2596.51^max) MB/s +398%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)	2152 MB/s +313%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1457 (1124.17^min - 1456.77^max) MB/s +180%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (305 - 2783, n=10)	1060 MB/s +103%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	521 (510.95^min - 520.65^max) MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	515 (507.16^min - 514.77^max) MB/s -1%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	9125 Points +98%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	7356 Points +60%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7037 Points +53%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)	6843 Points +49%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6311 Points +37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5491 Points +19%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4607 Points
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3272 - 5610, n=9)	4237 Points -8%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3235 Points +124%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2814 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2626 Points +82%
Average of class Gaming (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)	2508 Points +74%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2446 Points +70%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1465 Points +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1443 Points
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (961 - 1761, n=9)	1343 Points -7%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4288 Points +72%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3367 Points +35%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	3144 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)	3120 Points +25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3046 Points +22%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2658 Points +6%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2498 Points
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (1792 - 3010, n=9)	2279 Points -9%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5856.12 MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	5348.25 MB/s +31%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5017 MB/s +23%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)	4963 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4068 MB/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3920 MB/s -4%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3074 - 4308, n=9)	3821 MB/s -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2638 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4750.28 MB/s +102%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	4539.36 MB/s +93%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)	3673 MB/s +56%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3110 MB/s +33%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3007 MB/s +28%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2793 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2347 MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (1536 - 3059, n=9)	2199 MB/s -6%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	77.12 MB/s +26%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	73.6 MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)	66.9 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	61.45 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.3 MB/s
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	58.8 MB/s -4%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	56.7 MB/s -8%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (41.5 - 61.3, n=9)	51.1 MB/s -17%
4K Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	276.66 MB/s +13%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	249 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	244 MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (117 - 512, n=9)	219 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)	211 MB/s -14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	179.8 MB/s -26%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	143.61 MB/s -41%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	142.6 MB/s -42%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2572.63 MB/s +164%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2306 MB/s +137%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2218.05 MB/s +128%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1995 MB/s +105%
Average of class Gaming (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)	1939 MB/s +99%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	974 MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (605 - 1272, n=9)	909 MB/s -7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	890 MB/s -9%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3536.78 MB/s +75%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2908 MB/s +44%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2592 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	2546.85 MB/s +26%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)	2544 MB/s +26%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2108 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2020 MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (1381 - 2500, n=9)	1872 MB/s -7%
Access Time Read
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.094 ms * -42%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (0.032 - 0.121, n=9)	0.07144 ms * -8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.066 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.058 ms * +12%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)	0.05343 ms * +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.044 ms * +33%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.036 ms * +45%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.026 ms * +61%
Access Time Write
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.096 ms * -500%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.053 ms * -231%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)	0.04639 ms * -190%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (0.016 - 0.073, n=9)	0.03289 ms * -106%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.028 ms * -75%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	0.027 ms * -69%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.022 ms * -38%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.016 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø4968 (4645.97-4987.24)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø6610 (5942.35-6692.05)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5389 (4525.2-5730.75)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6448 (5744.31-7139.12)

Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø3882 (3285.33-6067.45)

MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4543 (2707.25-4716.49)

图形卡

我们的审查模型是由一个Nvidia Geforce RTX 4060.一个RTX 4050或RTX 4070也可使用。该卡的最大功耗为120瓦，包括20瓦的动态提升。

在3DMark基准测试中，它的表现比我们数据库中的平均RTX 4060笔记本电脑大约好10%（涡轮增压）。

当我们比较涡轮增压和性能模式的结果时，特别明显的是，图形性能增加，但CPU和物理性能往往下降（见Cloud Gate 或Fire Strike ）。

离开墙壁后，图形性能下降了。在性能模式下，Fire Strike 图形得分下降了约17%，在安静模式下下降了整整42%。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming	94.2 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	92.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	91 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	88.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	83.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	81.7 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	62.6 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	56.4 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)	40513 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	37654 Points +6%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	36323 Points +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	36065 Points +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	35540 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (28136 - 37796, n=36)	34335 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	31126 Points -12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	23303 Points -34%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	177440 Points +13%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	157044 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (81407 - 180228, n=22)	146295 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)	136246 Points -13%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	108854 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	54238 Points -65%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=237, last 2 years)	29469 Points +10%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	27681 Points +3%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	26801 Points
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	26612 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	26561 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (20533 - 27752, n=33)	25146 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21208 Points -21%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	17256 Points -36%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=235, last 2 years)	12072 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	10855 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	10404 Points 0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	10402 Points
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	10299 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (7484 - 11267, n=35)	9785 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	8592 Points -17%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	6418 Points -38%

3DMark 11 Performance		31662 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		62454 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		24131 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		10794 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Gaming (51 - 668, n=15, last 2 years)	275 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	75 Seconds *
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	74 Seconds *
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	63 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	32 Seconds * -45%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	26 Seconds * -18%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	25 Seconds * -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (19 - 28, n=32)	23.4 Seconds * -6%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)	23.1 Seconds * -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	22 Seconds *
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	22 Seconds * -0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	15 Seconds * +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	15 Seconds * +32%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	55 Seconds * -31%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	45 Seconds * -7%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	44 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (40 - 53, n=32)	44 Seconds * -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	42 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	42 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)	40.2 Seconds * +4%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	36 Seconds * +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	34 Seconds * +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	23 Seconds * +45%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	18 Seconds * +57%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Corsair Voyager a1600 AMD Radeon RX 6800M, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	382 Seconds * -18%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS	378 Seconds * -17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	376 Seconds * -16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS	376 Seconds * -16%
Lenovo Legion S7 16ARHA7 AMD Radeon RX 6800S, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	361 Seconds * -12%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13620H	353 Seconds * -9%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	340 Seconds * -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	323 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU (189 - 452, n=32)	316 Seconds * +2%
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years)	314 Seconds * +3%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700HX	311 Seconds * +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	304 Seconds * +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	286 Seconds * +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	192 Seconds * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Photoshop PugetBench
General Score
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI	168.2 Points +45%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W	159.6 Points +38%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014	155.2 Points +34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY	151.8 Points +31%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro	120.2 Points +4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V	115.9 Points
Overall Score
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI	1356 Points +43%
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W	1308 Points +38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY	1245 Points +31%
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014	1237 Points +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro	1075 Points +13%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V	949 Points

Premiere Pro PugetBench - Overall Score 0.9
MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014	1308 Points +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V	1215 Points
Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W	1105 Points -9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI	1097 Points -10%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro	913 Points -25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY	821 Points -32%

Legend

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

MSI Stealth 17 Studio A13VH-014 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

Asus Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650PY-NM006W AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR

游戏性能

在全高清状态下，我们测试的几乎每一款游戏都能以最大的细节顺利运行。甚至手头有足够的资源用于QHD，只有要求非常高的游戏，如《最后的我们》，才会耗尽能量。

在我们的比较中，Flow X16与Katana 17 处于同一水平，后者的RTX 4060 的TGP最大功率只有105瓦。另一方面，它与Legion 5 只有5%的差距，后者的RTX 4060的TGP为140瓦。这再次表明，正如我们的同事在分析新的Nvidia Geforce RTX 4000卡时强调的那样，GPU很难从更高的TGP中获益。上一代产品，其RTX 3070 Ti ，比它整整多出21%。

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 ^-1! Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	98 pt
Average of class Gaming	93.7 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	92.4 pt
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	92.1 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	76 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 ^-1! Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	70 pt
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	64.6 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)	117.2 fps +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	107.6 (101^min) fps +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106.5 (35.5^P0.1, 82.1^P1) fps
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	104.7 (88^min) fps -2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	97.8 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71 (33^P0.1, 57^P1) fps -33%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	66 (62^min, 63^P1) fps -38%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	119.6 (3.03^min, 76.9^P1) fps +8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	112.1 (8^min, 62.5^P1) fps +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	110.3 (3.88^min, 71.4^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=220, last 2 years)	107.7 fps -2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.6 fps -14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	78.7 (6.43^min, 50^P1) fps -29%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	74.7 (3.95^min, 41.7^P1) fps -32%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 194.9, n=230, last 2 years)	111.6 fps +11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109.8 fps +9%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100.8 fps
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	96.1 fps -5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	94.9 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82 fps -19%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59.9 fps -41%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=228, last 2 years)	207 fps +8%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	192.5 (23.6^min, 138.1^P1) fps
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	185.1 (15.5^min, 136.7^P1) fps -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	167.2 (107.5^min, 131.7^P1) fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	148.7 (37.3^min, 101.7^P1) fps -23%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	161.8 (140.3^min) fps +8%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	156.3 (132.3^min) fps +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	149.2 (118.7^min) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	148 (129.7^min) fps -1%
Average of class Gaming (26.9 - 220, n=240, last 2 years)	143.1 fps -4%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	112.1 (93.8^min) fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.4 (78.5^min) fps -35%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	121.9 fps +5%
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	118.9 fps +2%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	116.4 fps
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 166.2, n=245, last 2 years)	102.2 fps -12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	100.9 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	72.2 fps -38%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	70.8 fps -39%

Witcher 3 帧率显示出通常的日/夜曲线，但在其他方面非常稳定。根据GPU-Z日志，核心时钟速度几乎保持在2,460 MHz，内存时钟速度也很稳定（2 GHz）。

GPU的温度在平均75°C左右时有些波动，但在一小时后持续上升，这意味着在较长的运行时间内，时钟速度可能会被节制住。

该卡的平均功耗只有92.5瓦，我们看到极短的峰值为110瓦，但从未达到可能的120瓦。

凭借其RTX 4070的情况下，该Galaxy 书3与我们的X16相比没有任何机会，从技术角度看，它甚至能够接近 Legion 5.

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø94.4 (90-99)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø77.2 (70-83)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø96.9 (93-103)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	184.4	179.8	173.9	110.3	79.4
The Witcher 3 (2015)			214.8	106.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	188.3	166	162.8	149.2		115.5
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)			100.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	174	145.4	116.4			105.6
Far Cry 5 (2018)			140	130	99
Strange Brigade (2018)	419	266	225	192.5	129.2
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)			150	137	93
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020)			114	98	71
Far Cry 6 (2021)			120	108	79
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)			84.25	76.64	48.71
F1 22 (2022)	257	218	183.9	64.8	42.3
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022)			91	86	61
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)			106.9	91.9	42.8
The Last of Us (2023)			71.2	53.1	32.7

排放--使用福禄X16也可以实现安静。

噪声排放

怠速运行时，风扇大多保持不动。在负载下，噪音显然取决于所选择的性能模式。例如，当在涡轮增压模式下游戏时，风扇转速超过50分贝，而在性能模式下，它们的运行频率为44分贝，更容易忍受。仅仅是这一相对较大的差异就应该使性能模式下的小幅性能下降变得更容易忍受。在安静模式下，分贝水平下降到大约只有37分贝。

在涡轮增压模式下，在运行游戏等高要求的任务后，如果不是全速运行，风扇也会运行相当长的时间。然而，即使在空闲状态下，如果之前刚刚进行了游戏，X16也会在相当长的时间内保持噪音。

因此，对于内容创作者，我们建议使用性能模式（甚至是安静模式），因为它们更安静，可用功率的下降是可以容忍的。

当空闲运行时，Windows或华硕的背景程序会不断干扰安静的风扇。这些风扇会启动，特别是在涡轮增压模式下。

模式/Witcher 3 Ultra	FPS	Lautstärke in dB	Durchschnittsverbrauch in W
Turbo	102	50.92	142
Leistung	92	44
Leise	80	37.53	106

Noise Level

Idle		24 / 24 / 24 dB(A)
Load		36.71 / 50.92 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HS, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13620H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Noise		-13%	-9%	1%	-6%	-19%
off / environment *	24	25.5 -6%	25.2 -5%	23 4%	22.9 5%	24.5 -2%
Idle Minimum *	24	25.5 -6%	25.2 -5%	23.1 4%	22.9 5%	24.5 -2%
Idle Average *	24	25.5 -6%	25.2 -5%	23.1 4%	22.9 5%	24.5 -2%
Idle Maximum *	24	27.4 -14%	31.3 -30%	26.6 -11%	36.8 -53%	40 -67%
Load Average *	36.71	49.9 -36%	38.8 -6%	34.7 5%	43.7 -19%	48.3 -32%
Witcher 3 ultra *	50.92			47.6 7%	46.2 9%	56 -10%
Load Maximum *	50.92	55 -8%	51.2 -1%	54.8 -8%	46.2 9%	59.1 -16%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在游戏过程中，在设备的中间、顶部和背面可以发现大约50℃的热点，而掌托和WASD键则保持相对低温。在笔记本电脑的底部，它不会变得过于温暖。

然而，即使在空闲使用时，电源适配器也会变得非常热。在空闲运行时，只需要几个后台进程就可以将超薄的PSU加热到45°C的温度!

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40 °C	50 °C	40 °C
35 °C	46 °C	39 °C
31 °C	30 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 36.6 °C


43 °C	44 °C	40 °C
32 °C	38 °C	35 °C
28 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 33.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 57 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


34 °C	36 °C	34 °C
30 °C	34 °C	31 °C
29 °C	29 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 36 °C
Average: 31.9 °C


33 °C	33 °C	31 °C
31 °C	31 °C	30 °C
29 °C	29 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 30.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39 °C	48 °C	42 °C
35 °C	46 °C	39 °C
28 °C	29 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 48 °C
Average: 37.4 °C


40 °C	40 °C	37 °C
32 °C	35 °C	31 °C
27 °C	27 °C	27 °C

Maximum: 40 °C
Average: 32.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 52 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).

	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK Intel Core i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat		-13%	-4%	0%	4%	2%
Maximum Upper Side *	46	55.1 -20%	45.9 -0%	42.8 7%	41.6 10%	41.6 10%
Maximum Bottom *	41	50.3 -23%	50.9 -24%	50 -22%	55.7 -36%	43.1 -5%
Idle Upper Side *	36	35.5 1%	31.6 12%	29.6 18%	25.9 28%	32 11%
Idle Bottom *	33	36.1 -9%	34.2 -4%	34 -3%	28 15%	35.8 -8%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在开始时，核心提升到几乎4GHz，CPU耗电85瓦。然而，大约一分钟后，核心温度达到96℃，性能明显节流。几分钟后，核心时钟速度下降到2.4GHz，TDP只有35瓦。这导致了温度的进一步下降。几分钟后，速度增加，波动相当大，稳定在平均2.6GHz左右。TDP减少到35瓦，每次数分钟，是一个定期发生的现象，之后它再次周期性地波动。由于温度下降得同样快，这并不是这种行为的唯一原因。

在较小的程度上，GPU是类似的。相对稳定的阶段要短得多，总体数值波动更大。时钟频率从2.4GHz到2.4GHz反复震荡，只有500MHz，甚至更低，内存时钟速度也表现出类似的极端波动。平均温度为65℃，最高为82℃。耗电量平均为46瓦，但反复跳到90瓦或超过100瓦。

	CPU时钟(GHz)	GPU时钟(MHz)	CPU平均温度(℃)	GPU平均温度(℃)
Prime95 + FurMark压力	2,6	1.870	73	65
Witcher 3 StressAllerdings könnten die Boxen etwas lauter	505	2.460	67,6	75

发言人

扬声器提供了平衡的中音和高音，当然，低音也比较低，尽管比其他一些型号要低。然而，总的来说，扬声器的声音可以再大一点。

提供了3.5毫米耳机插孔，以便能够连接模拟终端设备。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.38 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 18% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--好，但不是很好

能源管理

当空闲运行时，我们的X16不像Galaxy Book3那样经济，这也是由于明亮的触摸屏显示。尽管如此，在空闲使用时，与Legion 5相比，该设备有天壤之别。但是，瞥了一眼17英寸的Katana，很明显，Flow X16在空闲时可以更节能一些。

在游戏时，能耗可与Katana 17但性能稍好。同时，在Legion 5从墙上获取的电力明显更多。后者也适用于其前代r，新的华硕已经明显变得更有效率。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.01 / 0.02 Watt
Idle	9.6 / 16 / 16.9 Watt
Load	104 / 214 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, Mini LED, 2560x1600, 16.10	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED / AMOLED, 2880x1800, 16.00	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3072x1920, 14.50	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-48%	41%	-63%	23%	0%	-12%	-30%
Idle Minimum *	9.6	12.2 -27%	4.3 55%	24.5 -155%	7.6 21%	12.2 -27%	13 ?(3 - 33, n=30) -35%	13.8 ?(2 - 64, n=179, last 2 years) -44%
Idle Average *	16	25.5 -59%	4.6 71%	29.2 -83%	13.3 17%	14.9 7%	17.1 ?(7.1 - 35, n=30) -7%	19.2 ?(8 - 67, n=179, last 2 years) -20%
Idle Maximum *	16.9	29.8 -76%	11.4 33%	34.3 -103%	13.7 19%	15.8 7%	21.5 ?(7.6 - 45, n=30) -27%	27 ?(9 - 101.1, n=179, last 2 years) -60%
Load Average *	104	183 -76%	97 7%	98.7 5%	88.2 15%	85.22 18%	96.4 ?(59 - 190, n=30) 7%	111.3 ?(32.1 - 202, n=178, last 2 years) -7%
Witcher 3 ultra *	142	183.6 -29%	100.9 29%	178.6 -26%	94.2 34%	151.1 -6%
Load Maximum *	214	253 -18%	107 50%	249.6 -17%	143 33%	212.8 1%	214 ?(99 - 364, n=30) -0%	251 ?(64.5 - 418, n=177, last 2 years) -17%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø141.9 (136.9-151.47)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø100.9 (71.1-104.4)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø178.6 (171.9-199.5)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø136.1 (82.14-214.26)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø105.4 (98.7-107.8)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø221 (187.8-252)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16 (9.561-34.736)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.85 (3.7-6.89)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø25.4 (24.5-27.4)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø118.2 (113.22-122.35)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø90 (84.7-106.5)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø175.2 (156.2-220)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø147.8 (145.68-151.2)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø102.3 (78-107.5)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø183.9 (171.3-213)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø116.7 (56.533-154.16)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø136.7 (133.9-140.46)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø93 (70.3-99.7)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø199.7 (192.6-206)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø139 (136.06-146.73)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø104 (81.6-106)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø176.3 (173.5-204)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.17 (6.54-11.48)

Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø5.1 (4.42-7.84)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø24.4 (23.3-38.8)

电池寿命

我们的评测模型保留了与其前身相同的电池容量（90Wh）。前代产品.这样一来，苗条的X16的电池就比正常尺寸的中级游戏机中的类型大，比如说 Legion 5.

因此，可以预期电池寿命很长。这使我们的Wi-Fi测试更加令人惊讶。电池较小的竞争对手，如Galaxy Book3（76Wh）或Yoga Pro 7（73Wh）也拥有同样好的耐力。这是X16可以改善其空闲功耗的一个领域。

尽管如此，电池寿命还是不错的，但是，考虑到大尺寸的电池，可以期待更好的运行时间--至少在浏览互联网等要求不高的任务时。此外，在电池模式下上网时，要确保选择静音模式而不是性能模式。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		7h 54min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 52min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 29min

	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601RW-M5082W R9 6900HS, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Samsung Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16, i9-13900H RTX 4070 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 73 Wh	MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 53.5 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-34%	-12%	-56%	7%	-49%	-17%
H.264	532		539 1%		742 39%		400 ?(56 - 747, n=94, last 2 years) -25%
WiFi v1.3	474	339 -28%	478 1%	205 -57%	595 26%	176 -63%	368 ?(57 - 745, n=183, last 2 years) -22%
Load	89	53 -40%	56 -37%	41 -54%	49 -45%	58 -35%	84.7 ?(36 - 173, n=145, last 2 years) -5%
Witcher 3 ultra		51					80.6 ?(47 - 155, n=23, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle				401			546 ?(57 - 1290, n=85, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 薄而轻

+ 良好、明亮的触摸屏显示

+ 强大的CPU性能

+ 高水平的图形性能

+ 性能模式下相对安静

Cons

- 比前代产品更慢的SSD

- 在涡轮增压模式下，声音大得出乎意料

- 风扇在加载后继续运行很长一段时间

结论 - 一个美妙的、非常通用的设备

最重要的是，华硕ROG Flow X16是一件事--多才多艺！它是一款轻薄的移动工作设备，是二合一的平板电脑，是强大的工作站，甚至是游戏电脑！它是一款轻薄的移动工作设备，是二合一、平板电脑，是强大的工作站，甚至是游戏电脑。但更令人惊讶的是：它把所有这些事情做得非常好，没有犯任何大的错误。它完全不是一个懒惰的妥协。

因为，尽管它有紧凑的尺寸和二合一功能，但硬件没有被扼杀，至少在涡轮增压模式下，拥有高于平均水平的性能。虽然这时它变得有点吵，但它并不比纯粹以游戏为重点的竞争者的声音大。然而，即使在结束了一段重载后，风扇也会继续运行相当长的时间。

我们将产品类别改为 "游戏"，因为这里的得分比 "可转换 "类别大约高2.4个百分点。

华硕ROG Flow X16是一款功能非常全面和强大的游戏工作站二合一产品，具有良好的触屏显示。

到目前为止，这类替代品少之又少。目前，华硕自己似乎非常热衷于试验。潜在买家可以看看我们在文章开头提到的一款设备，即华硕ROG Flow Z13游戏平板。该三星Galaxy Book3 Ultra 16(89%)同样不错，但是尽管有更强大的GPU，却有些迟钝。规格较弱的是联想Yoga Pro 7 14 G8(90%)也值得考虑。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

目前，我们配置的带有RTX 4060的Flow X16在亚马逊或BestBuy上无法购买。然而，在后者的商店里，RTX4070型号可以以2699.99美元的价格买到。

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V - 2023-06-08 06/08/2023 v7
Christian Hintze

Chassis

90 / 98 → 92%

Keyboard

84%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

61 / 80 → 76%

Weight

62 / 10-66 → 94%

Battery

79 / 95 → 83%

Display

87%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

93%

Temperature

86 / 95 → 91%

Noise

87 / 90 → 97%

Audio

79%

Average

84%

90%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 88 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 纤薄的华硕ROG Flow X16笔记本电脑评测：强大的16英寸游戏工作站二合一，带触摸屏

Christian Hintze, 2023-06-15 (Update: 2023-06-15)

纤薄的华硕ROG Flow X16笔记本电脑评测：强大的16英寸游戏工作站二合一，带触摸屏

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例 - 和去年一样苗条和优秀

尺寸比较

特点 - TB4和XG移动接口

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

安全问题

辅料

输入设备 - X16有一个大的触摸板

显示屏 - 有或没有迷你LED？

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 强大的华硕平板电脑

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

大容量存储

Continuous performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放--使用福禄X16也可以实现安静。

噪声排放

温度

压力测试

发言人

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V audio analysis

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 audio analysis

能源管理--好，但不是很好

能源管理

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一个美妙的、非常通用的设备

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare