联想Legion Slim 7i 16 8代笔记本电脑评论:比Razer Blade 16更薄
联想Legion Slim 7i Gen 8取代了去年的 Legion 瘦身7i第7代采用较新的第13代Raptor Lake-H CPU,Nvidia Ada Lovelace GPU,并修改了机箱设计。它补充了更厚、更强大的 Legion Pro 7系列.
我们的评测单位是一个更高端的配置,配备酷睿i9-13900H,140WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU,以及2560 x 1600 240 Hz IPS显示屏,零售价约1600美元。其他SKU有较小的Core i7-13700H,RTX 4060,或更高分辨率的3200 x 2000 165 Hz显示屏,起价约为1500美元。
Legion Slim 7i G8的竞争者包括其他轻薄的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 Razer Blade 16, HP Omen 16, 华硕ROG Zephyrus M16,或 外星人x16 R1.
更多联想评论:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90 % | 07/2023 | Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.4 % | 07/2023 | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23.6 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 | |
88.4 % | 06/2023 | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.8 % | 06/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % | 03/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 30.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.2 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 现在有了更多的通风栅栏
从正面看,该机箱可能与去年的Legion Slim 7i 16 G7相似,但大部分外部变化是沿着背部和底部两侧。例如,后部边缘现在是平的,看起来更干净,而这次的通风格栅明显更大,以改善散热。
底座材料在其他方面与其他Legion 7机型上看到的灰铝表面和感觉一样。尽管外形很薄,但底座仍然很坚硬,盖子也相对牢固。小铰链并不像华硕ROG Strix G16上的大铰链那样牢固。 华硕ROG Strix G16但它们允许一个完整的180度的开放,这在游戏笔记本上是不常见的。
联想将其称为Legion Slim 7不是没有道理的。与Legion Pro 7相比,我们的超薄版明显轻了600克,明显薄了6毫米以上。事实上,Legion Slim 7是最薄和最轻的16英寸游戏笔记本电脑之一,仅次于稍薄和更轻的 微星GS66.
连接性 - 支持Thunderbolt 4
端口的选择是多样的,大多数都是沿着后部边缘,与Alienware系列很相似。然而,与Alienware不同的是,联想的两个USB-C端口是沿着左边的边缘,以便于使用。
请注意,两个USB-C端口中只有一个支持Thunderbolt 4。如果某些配件不能在一个端口上工作,那么一定要尝试另一个。例如,我们的Lepow外部显示器可以在USB-C 3.2端口上使用,但不能在USB-C Thunderbolt端口上使用。
SD卡阅读器
使用我们的UHS-II测试卡,通过SD卡读卡器的传输速率平均为80MB/s左右,这大约是读卡器的一半速度。 叶片16.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x16 R1 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
沟通
英特尔AX211是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.3连接的标准配置。当与我们的6GHz华硕AXE11000网络配对时,性能稳定而可靠。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
网络摄像头
200万像素的网络摄像头仍然与去年的型号相同。没有红外支持,但网络摄像头杀毒开关是标准配置。
维护
底部面板由八个十字螺丝固定,便于拆卸。用户可以直接接触到两个M.2 2280 PCIe4插槽、WLAN模块和电池。内存包括16GB焊接的DDR5-5200,以及靠近中心的铝制屏蔽层下面的一个可扩展的SODIMM插槽。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,则适用标准的一年有限制造商保修。
输入设备 - 宽敞,带有每键RGB照明
与去年相比,键盘和点击板没有变化。 Legion Slim 7i G7因此,用户界面体验保持不变。这不一定是件坏事,因为1.5毫米的键程和坚实的反馈与Blade 16的较浅的键相比,打字时仍然更舒适。我们也很欣赏大的方向键,因为这些同样的键在其他游戏笔记本上往往是令人沮丧的小,如 华硕ROG Strix系列或 MSI Pulse系列.
显示器 - 与Legion Pro 7相同
有以下两种面板选择,都支持G-Sync:
- 2560 x 1600, 240 Hz, 5 ms响应时间, 100% sRGB, 500 nits, Pantone认证
- 3000 x 2000,165 Hz,3毫秒响应时间,100% DCI-P3,430尼特,Pantone认证
我们的1600p配置配备了完全相同的MNG007DA2-3 IPS面板,在更大和更昂贵的Legion 较大和较昂贵的Pro 7两种型号之间有相同的观看体验。这是一个适合游戏和业余图形编辑的高端面板,尽管它是基本选项。然而,正如下面的截图所示,背光渗漏比我们希望的更明显。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 474.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1217:1 (Black: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.57
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
72.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.22
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 CSOT T3 MNG007DA2-3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Omen 16-wf000 BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | Alienware x16 R1 BOE NE16NZ4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | 21% | -1% | 19% | 22% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.4 | 69 -2% | 99.2 41% | 69.5 -1% | 97 38% | 98.5 40% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 99.2 0% | 100 1% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 1% | 100 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 72.5 | 71.2 -2% | 88.6 22% | 71.6 -1% | 84.9 17% | 89.7 24% |
Response Times | 27% | 21% | 29% | 42% | 5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 12 ? | 4.6 ? 62% | 5.1 ? 57% | 10.9 ? 9% | 5.1 ? 57% | 6.6 ? 45% |
Response Time Black / White * | 8.9 ? | 9.7 ? -9% | 10.3 ? -16% | 4.6 ? 48% | 6.6 ? 26% | 12 ? -35% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | -5% | -11% | -5% | -4% | -12% | |
Brightness middle | 474.6 | 310.9 -34% | 302.2 -36% | 491 3% | 470 -1% | 456.8 -4% |
Brightness | 445 | 296 -33% | 285 -36% | 472 6% | 459 3% | 437 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 91 6% | 89 3% | 91 6% | 93 8% | 83 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.35 10% | 0.26 33% | 0.4 -3% | 0.42 -8% | 0.35 10% |
Contrast | 1217 | 888 -27% | 1162 -5% | 1228 1% | 1119 -8% | 1305 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.12 | 2.18 -3% | 1.63 23% | 1.6 25% | 1.86 12% | 3.7 -75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.73 | 3.58 24% | 4.13 13% | 5.15 -9% | 3.87 18% | 6.42 -36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.57 | 0.52 9% | 1.17 -105% | 0.97 -70% | 0.93 -63% | 0.66 -16% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 2.8 -0% | 2.5 11% | 3 -7% | 2.7 4% | 2.6 7% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.18 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.211 100% | 2.246 98% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6542 99% | 6002 108% | 6590 99% | 6979 93% | 6711 97% | 6108 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7% /
0% | 10% /
0% | 8% /
1% | 19% /
7% | 5% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
这款显示器经过预先校准,其平均灰度和色彩deltaE值分别为2.8和2.12。用X-Rite色度计对其进行校准,将进一步提高这些平均值,分别为0.8和0.57。因此,最终用户校准并不是完全必要的,但我们经过校准的ICM配置文件还是可以在上面免费提供给感兴趣的用户。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.1 ms rise | |
↘ 3.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 19 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
显示屏的亮度明显高于奥曼16或 亮度比Alienware x16 R1在户外更容易阅读。事实上,它的最大亮度设置只比MacBook Pro 16上暗了大约10%。 MacBook Pro 16.
性能 - 第13代酷睿i9
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们将设备设置为dGPU模式和性能模式,并激活了GPU超频和超速功能。 联想Vantage是调整性能、更新、保修、RGB和其他功能的控制中心。
支持高级优化或MUX。
需要注意的是,我们的设备有一个未被占用的SODIMM插槽,因此它只运行在16GB的单通道焊接内存上。因此,AIDA64内存基准测试结果要比大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑低得多。
处理器
猛禽湖-H 酷睿i9-13900H在多线程性能方面比Alder Lake-H有25%的可观提升。 酷睿i9-12900H.最值得注意的是,它的性能基本上与更昂贵的酷睿i7-13700HX和 酷睿i9-13900HK.如果你发现自己在这三款第13代CPU之间做出选择,那么Core i9-13900H将是性价比最高的选择。
降级到基本 酷睿i7-13700H配置,预计将使处理器性能下降约20%至25%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=22) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=22) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=22) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=22) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=22) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=22) | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=22) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=22) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 |
系统性能
PCMark的结果很好,与其他高端游戏笔记本的结果相当。然而,我们遇到了从睡眠中唤醒的问题,笔记本电脑经常需要长达10秒钟的时间才能正确打开屏幕,而其他笔记本电脑最多只需要几秒钟。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5855 - 8538, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8835 - 11940, n=8) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7967 - 10991, n=8) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7738 - 13575, n=8) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1104 - 1974, n=7) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1058 - 1914, n=7) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1178 - 2254, n=7) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1037 - 1952, n=7) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8538 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (82.3 - 102.3, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了与Nvidia NVLDDMKM驱动有关的DPC问题,与我们在Pro 7上观察到的情况很相似。 Legion Pro 7即使经过几次重试。在我们的测试视频中,以60 FPS播放4K视频几乎是完美的,只有一个丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Alienware x16 R1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 多达两个M.2固态硬盘
我们的设备配备了一个1TB三星PM9A1这是一个最快的基于消费者的PCIe4 x4驱动器。不幸的是,在压力下,传输率会从6700MB/s节流到低至3300MB/s,正如我们下面的表格所示,表明散热不良。这款Razer Blade 14配备了完全相同的三星固态硬盘,它不会表现出这样的问题。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Alienware x16 R1 | |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
HP Omen 16-wf000 | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 140 W RTX图形
原始图形性能比我们数据库中的普通笔记本电脑快约5%至10%,具有相同的 移动RTX 4070GPU。因此,整体性能大致与去年的 移动RTX 3080 Ti.
如果禁用超频功能,GPU性能会下降5%。如果在平衡模式下,CPU和GPU性能将分别下降约10%和15%,如下表所示。一些用户可能更喜欢平衡模式下更安静的风扇,即使这意味着更慢的性能。
降级到 RTX 4060根据我们在RTX 4070配置上的经验,预计对GPU性能的影响约为10%至15%。 Legion Pro 5 16.
电源配置文件设置 | Fire Strike 物理得分 | Fire Strike GPU得分 | Fire Strike 综合得分 |
性能+GPU超频开启+超速开启 | 32664 | 30130 | 12441 |
性能+GPU超频开+超速关 | 32439 | 30153 | 13360 |
性能+GPU超频关闭+超速关闭 | 32550 | 28629 (-5%) | 12319 |
平衡性 | 27499 (-16%) | 27708 (-8%) | 11295 (-9%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 35542 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 26650 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 12863 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
移动版RTX 4070在1440p/1600p和高设置下的60FPS方面表现良好,而更快的桌面版RTX 4070 Ti则在1440p/1600p和60FPS方面表现良好。 桌面RTX 4070 Ti则可以达到Ultra或最高设置。例如,用我们的联想在最大的1440p设置下运行Returnal ,几乎无法达到50FPS的水平。
当RTX 4070开始感到动力不足时,DLSS变得更加重要。例如,在4K Ultra设置下运行《赛博朋克2077》,在没有DLSS的情况下,平均只有23 FPS,而在启用DLSS2后,则有38 FPS的可玩性。
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 184 | 180.3 | 175 | 115.2 | 94.3 | 98.7 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 459.3 | 356.8 | 225.9 | 117.9 | 70 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 203 | 183.2 | 175.8 | 165.3 | 141.3 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 213 | 168.8 | 122.7 | 91.4 | 51.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 182.9 | 158.7 | 122.4 | 105.7 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 483 | 316 | 259 | 228 | 149.2 | 75.7 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 138.3 | 141.9 | 106.1 | 91 | 54.4 | 23.1 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 244.3 | 204.8 | 143.7 | 113.9 | 78.1 | 37 |
F1 22 (2022) | 258 | 261 | 219 | 81.5 | 46.2 | 25.9 |
Returnal (2023) | 83 | 81 | 76 | 61 | 52 | 27 |
排放
系统噪音
内部风扇始终处于活动状态,其音量略低于26 dB(A),而安静的背景为23 dB(A)。在大多数办公室和会议环境中,这并不响亮,不会让人分心,即使在引入3DMark 06这样的高负荷时,它们也能出色地保持较长时间的安静。
在性能模式下的游戏会引起54.4 dB(A)的稳定风扇噪音,这与Alienware x16 R1相似,但比Blade 16的噪音大。降至平衡模式后,如上文所述,风扇噪音明显降低到48.9 dB(A),从而换取了一些性能。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 25.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 27.6 / 54.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.8 dB(A) |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Omen 16-wf000 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N | Alienware x16 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HK, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -15% | -6% | -25% | -17% | -2% | |
off / environment * | 22.8 | 23 -1% | 22.7 -0% | 25 -10% | 25 -10% | 23 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 29.6 -25% | 23.1 2% | 28 -19% | 26 -10% | 23 3% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 29.8 -26% | 25.8 -9% | 30 -27% | 28 -19% | 23 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 30.4 -18% | 25.8 -0% | 38 -48% | 30 -17% | 23.6 8% |
Load Average * | 27.6 | 33.8 -22% | 39.3 -42% | 48 -74% | 48 -74% | 39 -41% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54.4 | 57 -5% | 49.9 8% | 53 3% | 49 10% | 51.6 5% |
Load Maximum * | 54.4 | 58.3 -7% | 54.8 -1% | 55 -1% | 52 4% | 51.3 6% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度的热点可以达到43 C至50 C,类似于 遇到游戏等高要求负载时,Alienware x16 R1在运行游戏等高要求的负载时。幸运的是,如下面的温度图所示,热点在最靠近后部边缘和第一排键盘按键的上方,手指和皮肤不太可能接触到那里。相比之下,掌托和WASD键仍然较凉。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.8 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | HP Omen 16-wf000 Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Alienware x16 R1 Intel Core i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 4% | -9% | -13% | -8% | 7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 49.8 | 45 10% | 47.2 5% | 53 -6% | 54 -8% | 40 20% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48.8 | 48.8 -0% | 47.8 2% | 59 -21% | 55 -13% | 37.6 23% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.4 | 29.2 1% | 36.8 -25% | 34 -16% | 29 1% | 32.4 -10% |
Idle Bottom * | 30 | 28.8 4% | 35.8 -19% | 32 -7% | 33 -10% | 31.4 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
运行Prime95时,CPU的时钟频率、温度和电路板的功耗将分别飙升至4.5 GHz、87 C和100 W,持续约一分钟左右。然后,CPU将最终稳定在3.5 GHz和80 W,以保持76 C的合理核心温度。 刀片16上重复这一相同的测试,配备更快的酷睿i9-13950HX将导致更高的核心温度为82℃。
Nvidia GPU将分别稳定在2580 MHz、114 W和71 C,当设置为性能模式并同时激活Overdrive和GPU Overclock时。GPU的纸面目标是140瓦,但我们在运行《赛博朋克2077》时也只能达到123瓦。如果在平衡模式下游戏,主板功耗和核心温度将分别降至84瓦和64摄氏度。对于轻薄型游戏笔记本来说,核心温度偏低;例如,Alienware x16 R1的CPU和GPU温度在运行同样的游戏时将高达80至95℃。
使用电池电源运行限制了性能,因为性能电源配置文件变成了灰色。Fire Strike ,物理和图形得分分别只有25602分和21049分,而使用电源时则为32664分和30130分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | GPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 45 | 40 |
Prime95压力 | 3.5 | -- | 76 | 49 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.6 - 3.5 | 1920 - 2610 | 77 - 90 | 75 |
Witcher 3 压力(平衡模式) | ~1.2 | 2220 | 62 | 64 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能/关闭GPU超频+关闭超速) | ~1.2 | 2460 | 64 | 70 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能/GPU超频开启+超速关闭) | ~1.2 | 2610 | 63 | 70 |
Witcher 3 压力(性能/GPU超频开启+超速开启) | ~1.2 | 2580 | 64 | 71 |
发言人
扬声器的最大音量约为85 dB(A),与大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑的音量差不多。在音频质量或低音再现方面也没有什么特别之处。在平衡模式下进行游戏时,扬声器的表现更好,因为风扇没有那么响。
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功率消耗 - 高空闲率
在桌面上闲置时的功耗相对较高,为22瓦,即使是在省电模式和最低亮度设置下。如下表所示,这似乎是采用第13代酷睿-H处理器的游戏笔记本电脑的一个共同特征,这可能是造成电池运行时间平平的原因。相比之下,由AMD Zen 4驱动的 Legion Pro 5 16在类似条件下可低至8瓦。
游戏消耗约172瓦,这与旧的 Zephyrus M16由Core i9-12900H和RTX 3070 Ti驱动。因此,我们的Legion Slim 7能够提供大约15%的快速图形性能,而不需要消耗更多的电力,以获得比老式安培动力游戏笔记本更高的每瓦性能。
我们能够测量到中等尺寸(约16.9 x 8.8 x 2.6厘米)的230瓦交流适配器的峰值消耗为213瓦。更大的Legion Pro 7包括一个更高的330 W适配器,它配备了更强大的Core i9-13900HX和RTX 4080。
Off / Standby | 0.09 / 0.13 Watt |
Idle | 22 / 29 / 39.5 Watt |
Load |
98.7 / 213.2 Watt |
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Acer Predator Helios 16 PH16-71-731Q i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 11% | -8% | -20% | -25% | 15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 22 | 15.9 28% | 21.8 1% | 20 9% | 25.2 -15% | 8.1 63% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 20.5 29% | 26 10% | 25 14% | 29.9 -3% | 15.9 45% |
Idle Maximum * | 39.5 | 20.9 47% | 36 9% | 35 11% | 49.8 -26% | 37.2 6% |
Load Average * | 98.7 | 106 -7% | 115.5 -17% | 136 -38% | 105.4 -7% | 90.9 8% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 171.8 | 175 -2% | 214 -25% | 282 -64% | 263 -53% | 189.6 -10% |
Load Maximum * | 213.2 | 276 -29% | 269.7 -27% | 320 -50% | 313.8 -47% | 263.5 -24% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量竟然和Legion Pro 7 17一样大,尽管我们的Slim 7i设计的外形更薄。尽管如此,电池寿命仍然是平均水平,在真实世界的浏览使用中仅低于4.5小时。大多数其他采用13代英特尔CPU的游戏笔记本电脑将返回类似或更短的运行时间,包括 Omen 16或Alienware x16 R1。
在启用快速充电功能的情况下,从空电到满电只需要70分钟,而其他大多数游戏笔记本的充电时间为90分钟或更长。该系统还可以通过USB-C充电,功率高达140W。
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8 i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | HP Omen 16-wf000 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Alienware x16 R1 i9-13900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 17% | -7% | 18% | 71% | 54% | |
Reader / Idle | 305 | 328 8% | 436 43% | 533 75% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 261 | 307 18% | 149 -43% | 308 18% | 583 123% | 365 40% |
Load | 55 | 68 24% | 44 -20% | 65 18% | 81 47% |
Pros
Cons
结论--几乎在每个方面都令人信服
Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8是Legion 家族中最平衡的游戏笔记本电脑之一。它不仅比16英寸尺寸类别中的大多数产品更薄、更轻,而且在涉及到端口选项、宽敞的每键RGB键盘、为游戏玩家和内容创作者提供的可敬的显示选项,甚至电池容量和SD读卡器时,也没有削减任何角落。考虑到其轻薄的外形,该型号检查出了很多盒子。
联想Legion Slim 7i 16 G8为更薄的尺寸和更轻的重量牺牲了一些性能选项,但该机型在性能和便携性方面非常平衡,大多数游戏玩家可能不会介意。
当你深入了解这台机器时,一些裂缝开始显现。例如,焊接和可扩展的内存配置,在游戏笔记本上是不常见的,而固态硬盘在压力下往往会被扼杀。CPU和GPU选项分别省略了更高端的酷睿i9-13900HX和RTX 4080,这些都是更厚更重的Legion Pro 7 16上才有的。因此,想要一切和厨房的发烧友将不得不解决更大和更重的替代品,如 Legion 笔记本电脑、Alienware m16,或 Razer Blade 16这些产品都提供更快的处理器选项。
价格和可用性
Lenovo Legion Slim 7i 16 Gen 8
-
07/03/2023 v7
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.