华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED笔记本电脑回顾：配备120赫兹OLED显示屏的MacBook Pro竞争对手

Name: Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI
Brand: Asus

面向内容创作者和游戏玩家的RTX 4070。 华硕重新推出14.5英寸的Zenbook Pro，并为这款快速多媒体笔记本配备了猛禽湖酷睿i9-13900H和新的GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU。具有2.8K分辨率的120赫兹OLED面板也是新的，但对电池寿命有负面影响。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/13/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

通过其新的Zenbook Pro 14，华硕为内容创作者提供了一个强大的多媒体笔记本，从而使其与Apple MacBook Pro 14直接竞争。除了目前英特尔的猛禽湖处理器，华硕还安装了Nvidia的新RTX GPU，据此我们的测试设备甚至拥有GeForce RTX 4070 LaptopGPU。一个特殊的功能是屏幕，这是一个2.8K的OLED触摸屏，120赫兹。

然而，所有这些硬件都是有代价的--我们的测试设备配备了一个酷睿i9 13900H，RTX 4070，32GB内存和2TB固态硬盘，价格高达3500欧元（约合3750美元），因此价格直接与 MacBook Pro 14(14英寸设备具有这样的性能值是罕见的，这就是为什么我们也列出一些15英寸机型作为比较设备。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI (ZenBook Pro 14 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 90 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2310 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 90 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 531.61, Optimus, MUX

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Channel, 16 GB onboard + 16 GB SO-DIMM, max. 48 GB

Display

14.50 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 234 PPI, capacitive, SDC4190, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, 2048 GB

, 1833 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

2 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 17.9 x 321.8 x 223.3

Battery

76 Wh, 4920 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200W PSU, Stylus, Sleeve, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.678 kg, Power Supply: 556 g

Price

3499 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89.3 %	06/2023	Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	17.9 mm	14.50"	2880x1800
87 %	06/2023	Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1.8 kg	21 mm	14.50"	2880x1800
93.9 %	03/2023	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU	1.6 kg	15.5 mm	14.20"	3024x1964
90 %	05/2023	Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1.7 kg	20.5 mm	14.00"	2560x1600
90.3 %	04/2023	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	18 mm	15.60"	3456x2160
89.9 %	03/2023	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440

外壳--Zenbook采用坚固的金属底盘

从视觉上看，新的Zenbook Pro 14看起来相当克制，只有显示屏盖上有一个小小的ProArt标志。华硕在其他方面没有添加任何其他视觉元素。表面很光滑，很快就会出现指纹污点，需要定期擦拭这些污点。这款笔记本在深色的科技黑中显得非常优雅，但掌托上的制造商贴纸却让人非常讨厌。右侧写有笔记本功能的大贴纸可以轻易撕掉，但左侧的四张小贴纸却不能。当你为它支付了3500欧元（约3750美元）时，谁想在他们的设备上贴上亚马逊Alexa的贴纸呢？

华硕使用了金属底盘，底座和显示盖都非常稳定，抗扭转。底座单元看起来也相当苗条，这是由锥形的侧面实现的。这与以下产品形成鲜明对比Apple MacBook Pro 14形成鲜明对比，例如，它的基本单元显得非常笨重，尽管它实际上比Zenbook更薄。这绝对不是一个非常薄的笔记本，但鉴于其强大的组件，这并不是一个批评点。

两个显示器铰链调整得很好，但不能完全防止在改变打开角度时出现某种摇晃。最大的打开角度是~135度。16:10面板的屏幕边缘非常窄，特别是在侧面，整体屏占比达到了85%。

在直接比较中，尤其是MacBook Pro 14在各方面都更紧凑一些，但在重量上没有大的差别。由于高性能的硬件，在我们的比较领域中，一些15英寸的设备自然需要多一点桌面空间。附带的200瓦电源在天平上又增加了556克的重量。

尺寸比较

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro DIN A4 ❌

设备 - 华硕安装了所有重要的端口

由于基站的后部区域被散热所占据，所以连接口分布在两边的中间。同时使用所有端口可能会导致工作场所显得非常拥挤。尽管如此，华硕提供了所有重要的端口，包括USB-A、USB-C和HDMI。后面的USB-C端口也支持Thunderbolt，如果你想在外部显示器上工作，也应该使用，因为这是在外部显示器上使用iGPU的唯一方法。另一个USB-C端口和HDMI输出总是使用专用的GPU，这消耗了不必要的电力，特别是在简单的任务中。

左边：电源、HDMI 2.1、USB-A 3.2 Gen.2（10Gbps）、3.5毫米音频

右边：SD读卡器（UHS-II），USB-C 3.2 Gen.2（10 Gbps，电力传输，DisplayPort ALT模式），USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4（40 Gbps，电力传输，DisplayPort ALT模式）。

SD卡阅读器

Zenbook提供了一个成熟的SD卡读卡器，也实现了非常高的传输速率。结合我们的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60），我们记录的最大传输速率超过了250 MB/s，在复制图像文件时，传输速率略高于100 MB/s。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro (AV Pro V60)	181 MB/s +77%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	153.8 MB/s +51%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (Angelibrid AV Pro V60)	133 MB/s +30%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	102 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (17.6 - 205, n=66, last 2 years)	93.3 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.8 MB/s -21%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	73.2 MB/s -28%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (Angelibrid AV Pro V60)	263 MB/s +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	252.9 MB/s
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro (AV Pro V60)	208 MB/s -18%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	182 MB/s -28%
Average of class Multimedia (16.8 - 266, n=62, last 2 years)	122.6 MB/s -52%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.1 MB/s -67%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	83.2 MB/s -67%

沟通

无线网络连接由英特尔的AX211模块处理，除了目前的Wi-Fi 6E标准外，它还支持蓝牙5.2。我们无法连接到华硕参考路由器的相应的6GHz网络，但在5GHz网络中的性能非常好，我们在WLAN方面没有问题。交付范围中还包括一个用于有线网络的USB以太网适配器。

Networking
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1462 (min: 1275) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1589 (min: 1449) MBit/s ∼93%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1567 (min: 1367) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1678 (min: 1641) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1406 (min: 1285) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1577 (min: 1301) MBit/s ∼91%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1777 (min: 1685) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1741 (min: 1650) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1658 (min: 1491) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1701 (min: 1660) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	894 (min: 804) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1235 (min: 676) MBit/s ∼73%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1650 MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1477 (min: 1339) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1663 (min: 842) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1692 (min: 1588) MBit/s ∼97%

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1462 (1275-1539)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1588 (1449-1635)

网络摄像头

华硕在屏幕上边框为网络摄像头安装了一个1080p传感器。画面质量比旧的720p型号好一点，但你不应该期待奇迹的发生。还安装了一个红外模块，可以通过Windows Hello进行面部识别。

ColorChecker Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: 7.59 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 16.86 ∆E

维护

下层机箱盖是用九颗Torx螺丝（T5）固定的，可以很容易地取下。然后你可以接触到两个风扇、电池和一个用于RAM模块的SODIMM插槽。然而，WLAN模块和一个RAM模块是焊接的。

输入设备 - 带有拨号板的触摸板

键盘

键盘的键程为1.4毫米，总体上提供平均的输入。考虑到机箱的厚度和价格，在这里可以做得更多，特别是由于按键总体上有一点响动。例如，我们更喜欢ROG Zephyrus G14的键盘（1.7毫米行程）。在布局方面，你还必须习惯于单排回车键以及小的方向键。最后，有一个三段式的白色背光，可以通过传感器激活。

触摸板和手写笔

华硕为触摸板设计了一个特殊的功能，即所谓的DialPad，它被安装在左上角。这个圆环为用户提供了额外的选项，与Adobe应用程序的整合效果非常好。例如，在日常使用中，亮度和音量都可以在这里调整。这一切都运行良好，但创意应用程序中的专用特殊键和快捷键通常工作得更快。

此外，你在简单操作Pad时注意到凸起的圆环，总体来说效果不错，但咔嚓声有点大。当然，电容式触摸屏也可以作为一种选择，还包括一支主动式手写笔，这也给人留下了很好的印象，特别是在编辑图像时。

显示屏 - 120赫兹OLED触摸屏

华硕为Zenbook Pro 14配备了一个高分辨率的OLED触摸屏。14.5英寸面板（16:10）的分辨率为2880x1800，主观画面印象从根本上说非常好，但由于触摸屏的原因，画质略有颗粒感。由于频率高，屏幕活动非常流畅。

在技术数据中，制造商规定亮度为400 cd/m²，或HDR内容的最大亮度为550 cd/m²。然而，在我们的测量中，该面板并没有完全达到这个标准，因为我们确定普通SDR内容（即日常事物）的平均亮度几乎为360cd/m²。对比度非常高，这是由于黑色水平较低造成的。在HDR内容方面，我们记录的最高值是584 cd/m²，其中有一个小的明亮的图像部分，而大约460 cd/m²是一个几乎完全白色的图像。

Windows的HDR设置是值得批评的，因为为了使HDR内容真正显示出来，首先必须在设置中激活HDR。然而，所有的颜色配置文件随后被完全丢弃，MyAsus软件的各种颜色配置文件不再可用。Apple'在MacBook Pro 14的迷你LED面板中，HDR的实现在这里显然更有优势，而且还能达到更高的亮度值。


360 cd/m²	355 cd/m²	359 cd/m²
355 cd/m²	356 cd/m²	358 cd/m²
360 cd/m²	356 cd/m²	360 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

SDC4190 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 360 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 357.7 cd/m² Minimum: 0.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 356 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 0.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19

	Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI SDC4190, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50	Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W ATNA45AF04-0 , OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20	Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY B140QAN06.S, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14.00	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Samsung 156XG01, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60
Display		-1%	0%	-1%	0%	-2%
Display P3 Coverage	99.6	99.91 0%	99.2 0%	99.6 0%	99.8 0%	97.6 -2%
sRGB Coverage	100	100 0%		100 0%	100 0%	99.4 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	97.5	95.35 -2%		93.4 -4%	98.4 1%	94 -4%
Response Times		-107%	-629%	-435%	-89%	-71%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.67 ?(0.33, 0.34)	2 ?(1, 1) -199%	35.2 ?(12.8, 22.4) -5154%	17.2 ?(7.2, 10) -2467%	1.68 ?(0.8, 0.88) -151%	2 ?(1, 1) -199%
Response Time Black / White *	0.9 ?(0.4, 0.5)	2 ?(1, 1) -122%	26.4 ?(11.2, 15.2) -2833%	9.9 ?(0.5, 9.4) -1000%	1.94 ?(0.97, 0.97) -116%	2 ?(1, 1) -122%
PWM Frequency	240	240 0%	14880 ?(100, 500) 6100%	5430 2163%	239 0%	500 ?(70) 108%
Screen		-43%	-22%	-17%	-178%	-49%
Brightness middle	356	340 -4%	500 40%	535 50%	389.5 9%	383 8%
Brightness	358	340 -5%	489 37%	563 57%	392 9%	384 7%
Brightness Distribution	99	99 0%	94 -5%	91 -8%	98 -1%	99 0%
Black Level *		0.002	0.02			0.03
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	0.8	1.76 -120%	1.2 -50%	1 -25%	4.95 -519%	1.89 -136%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.6	3.2 -100%	2.6 -63%	2.8 -75%	8.65 -441%	3.76 -135%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	0.9	1.16 -29%	1.7 -89%	1.8 -100%	2 -122%	1.26 -40%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.43 ^91%	2.24 ^98%	2.24 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6590 ^99%	6418 ^101%	6791 ^96%	6337 ^103%	6265 ^104%	6386 ^102%
Contrast		170000	25000			12767
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		1.62			1.53	2.67
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-50% / -48%	-217% / -202%	-151% / -117%	-89% / -111%	-41% / -43%

* ... smaller is better

我们用专业的CalMAN软件（即X-Rite i1 Pro 2）测量了OLED面板，使用默认的Native profile以及Display P3。在Native配置文件中，颜色显得有点过饱和，这导致了更加生动的图像质量，但一些颜色超过了3的重要限制。另一方面，Display P3配置文件提供了极其准确的颜色，并允许直接进行图像/视频编辑。我们无法通过自己的校准来进一步改善显示效果，这就是为什么这里没有提供相应的配置文件供下载。我们还提供了一个sRGB配置文件。P3色彩空间已经完全覆盖。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4 ms rise
0.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.33 ms rise
0.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.34 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

OLED面板的响应时间非常快，但我们在所有亮度水平上都检测到了PWM闪烁。直流调光被使用到50%的亮度水平，而频率为240赫兹的经典PWM被使用到50%以下。华硕自己建议不要低于这个亮度，而是使用MyAsus软件中的无闪烁OLED调光功能。我们在评论Zenbook S 13 OLED时详细讨论了这一点。笔记本S 13 OLED中详细讨论过，这里的功能也是一样的。

在户外，高反射的触摸屏是有问题的，因为你总是要处理反射问题，即使是在阴天。视角的稳定性总体上是非常好的。只有从某些（广角）角度，你才会注意到蓝色偏光，这是OLED面板的典型特征。

性能 - 酷睿i9和RTX 4070笔记本GPU

Zenbook Pro 14只配备了英特尔酷睿i9-13900H，并焊接了16GB的RAM。有一个SODIMM插槽，根据型号不同，配备了16或32GB的RAM。至于显卡，你可以选择GeForce RTX 4060 笔记本电脑和 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑、其中后者安装在我们的测试设备中。

测试条件

在MyAsus软件中，有三种不同的性能模式：Whisper、Standard 和Performance。下表显示了这些模式的TDP/TGP值。我们在下面的基准测试和测量中使用了性能模式，因为特别是GeForce GPU的图形性能，否则会明显降低。然而，在日常生活中，你可以很容易地使用其他两种模式中的一种，没有问题。Zenbook也有一个MUX开关，可以用来完全禁用集成GPU。然而，切换需要重新启动系统。

模式	CPU	GPU	压力测试	CB R23 Multi	Time Spy 图像
Whisper	45 watts	35 watts	CPU: 25 watts GPU：35瓦	13.453分	7.252分
标准	120 -> 80瓦	45瓦	CPU: 25瓦 GPU：35瓦	18.576分	8.218分
性能	120 -> 90 瓦	90 瓦	CPU：30瓦 GPU：75瓦	19.014分	11.398分

处理器 - 英特尔酷睿i9 13900H

英特尔酷睿i9-13900H是一款高端移动处理器，拥有6个性能核心和8个效率核心，这就是为什么在任何时候都可以处理总共20个线程。然而，除了稍高的时钟频率之外，与酷睿i9-13900H没有任何区别。酷睿i9-12900H.由于高功率限制，Zenbook Pro 14的性能非常好，尽管这里也必须说明，英特尔芯片只比新的 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS80瓦，尽管耗电量明显更高。在我们的CB R15多循环中，i9-13900H在运行几次后下降到90瓦，在这里它也比7940HS慢。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2643 (2455.49-3023.2)

Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2497 (2154.13-2705.63)

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro: Ø2069 (2052.12-2075.23)

Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2785 (2743.48-2847.79)

Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2169 (2072.22-2636.96)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

另一方面，性能核心的单核性能仍然非常好：我们看到比目前的优势约为15%。AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS这里。主要竞争对手Apple MacBook Pro 14在原始CPU性能方面显然处于劣势，但34瓦的功耗也明显降低。MacBook还有一个优势，就是在电池模式下性能保持不变。然而，Zenbook的CPU在没有电源的情况下降到了微不足道的30瓦，导致多核测试中的性能损失约为45%。更多的CPU基准测试列在我们的技术部分.

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	82.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	79.3 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro ^-6! Apple M2 Pro	76.6 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	76.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	73.5 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	70.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	65.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia	62.4 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	19014 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	18131 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	17236 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (13177 - 20385, n=25)	17182 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points -18%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	15474 (14020.7^min - 15473.8^max) Points -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	14787 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia (4624 - 30789, n=101, last 2 years)	14189 Points -25%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	2054 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	1966 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=23)	1906 Points -7%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	1836 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1789 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2110, n=99, last 2 years)	1713 Points -17%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	1647 Points -20%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	7289 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	7111 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4960 - 7716, n=22)	6689 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	6574 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points -18%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	5986 Points -18%
Average of class Multimedia (1783 - 11768, n=97, last 2 years)	5352 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	4044 Points -45%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	792 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	773 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=22)	727 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	708 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	696 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 812, n=97, last 2 years)	646 Points -18%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	447 Points -44%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	3023 (2455.49^min - 3023.2^max) Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2848 (2743.48^min - 2847.79^max) Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=23)	2713 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	2706 (2154.13^min - 2705.63^max) Points -10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	2637 (2072.22^min - 2636.96^max) Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia (785 - 4703, n=106, last 2 years)	2321 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	2069 (2052.12^min, 2054.58^P1 - 2075.23^max) Points -32%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	297 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	288 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	288 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=23)	272 Points -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	270 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (142.6 - 308, n=99, last 2 years)	251 Points -15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	230 Points -23%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 662, n=95, last 2 years)	265 Seconds * -54%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds * -28%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	217 Seconds * -26%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=21)	200 Seconds * -16%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	183 Seconds * -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	182 Seconds * -6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	172 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	78016 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	73434 MIPS -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	71121 MIPS -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=22)	67692 MIPS -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS -18%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	59413 MIPS -24%
Average of class Multimedia (20166 - 119900, n=90, last 2 years)	57411 MIPS -26%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6768 MIPS +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	6591 MIPS
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	6276 MIPS -5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	6124 MIPS -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=22)	6079 MIPS -8%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7163, n=90, last 2 years)	5639 MIPS -14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS -19%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	14859 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	14566 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	13241 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=22)	12803 Points -12%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	12652 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12179 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia (3828 - 23059, n=100, last 2 years)	11372 Points -22%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2022 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	2001 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro	1961 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	1936 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=22)	1909 Points -5%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	1900 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2342, n=100, last 2 years)	1758 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points -17%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	22.6 fps +8%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	20.9 fps
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.7 - 22.3, n=22)	18.9 fps -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	18.2 fps -13%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	17.6 fps -16%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps -17%
Average of class Multimedia (4.99 - 30.5, n=88, last 2 years)	15.6 fps -25%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s * -15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=22)	48.5 s * -10%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 84.9, n=92, last 2 years)	48 s * -9%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	44.2 s *
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	43.5 s * +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	40.6 s * +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	38.3 s * +13%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec * -24%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3826 - 0.723, n=90, last 2 years)	0.4811 sec * -18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=22)	0.4493 sec * -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4393 sec * -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4384 sec * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4167 sec * -2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4067 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

3023 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

228 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

297 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	97.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	92.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	87 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.9 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82.6 pt
Average of class Multimedia	79.1 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15979 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=22)	15528 KRay/s -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	14979 KRay/s -6%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13869 KRay/s -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s -16%
Average of class Multimedia (3804 - 27411, n=88, last 2 years)	12788 KRay/s -20%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	88148 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=22)	77877 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points -19%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	71305 Points -19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69120 Points -22%
Average of class Multimedia (16379 - 136048, n=88, last 2 years)	65480 Points -26%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3989 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=22)	3642 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	3193 MB/s -20%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3146 MB/s -21%
Average of class Multimedia (1099 - 6681, n=88, last 2 years)	3047 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116624 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	109021 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=22)	107083 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points -9%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	103652 Points -11%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 134321, n=88, last 2 years)	92085 Points -21%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10498 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=22)	9841 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points -8%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	9612 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (3099 - 15484, n=88, last 2 years)	9055 Points -14%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8714 Points -17%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	40277 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=22)	38588 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	35720 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points -16%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	33848 Points -16%
Average of class Multimedia (9602 - 68591, n=88, last 2 years)	33558 Points -17%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s +22%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=22)	84032 MB/s +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	81153 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (23702 - 169946, n=88, last 2 years)	76070 MB/s -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	63380 MB/s -22%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62599 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1206 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=22)	1066 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s -12%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	918 MB/s -24%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	883 MB/s -27%
Average of class Multimedia (302 - 1901, n=88, last 2 years)	868 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8599 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=22)	8424 KRay/s -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	7971 KRay/s -7%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	7475 KRay/s -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia (1996 - 14590, n=88, last 2 years)	6829 KRay/s -21%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44101 MPixel/s +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42346 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=22)	40521 MPixel/s -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	40185 MPixel/s -5%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=88, last 2 years)	36824 MPixel/s -13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s -19%

系统性能

系统性能非常好，良好的基准测试结果和我们主观的性能印象都证实了这一点。在测试过程中，我们没有遇到Zenbook Pro的问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8253 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (5855 - 8538, n=8)	7664 Points +2%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7578 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	7534 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points -3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7253 Points -4%
Average of class Multimedia (4635 - 8670, n=85, last 2 years)	6602 Points -12%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11449 Points +6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11235 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10831 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8835 - 11940, n=8)	10809 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10633 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=85, last 2 years)	10473 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10748 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9888 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7967 - 10991, n=8)	9840 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	9745 Points
Average of class Multimedia (5845 - 11186, n=85, last 2 years)	8709 Points -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	8501 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	13347 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (7738 - 13575, n=8)	11549 Points +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	10997 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10637 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10632 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points -6%
Average of class Multimedia (4688 - 13548, n=85, last 2 years)	8686 Points -21%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1943 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1888 Points -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1874 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1839 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1104 - 1974, n=7)	1815 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1812 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points -11%
Average of class Multimedia (1009 - 2146, n=91, last 2 years)	1701 Points -12%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1790 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1779 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1760 Points -2%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1754 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1058 - 1914, n=7)	1720 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points -8%
Average of class Multimedia (971 - 2064, n=91, last 2 years)	1622 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1562 Points -13%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z	2330 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2254 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2137 Points -5%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2104 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2085 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1178 - 2254, n=7)	1982 Points -12%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2865, n=91, last 2 years)	1893 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points -16%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1037 - 1952, n=7)	1650 Points +4%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1627 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1590 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points -1%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1548 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (926 - 2171, n=91, last 2 years)	1462 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1442 Points -9%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z	1333 Points -16%

PCMark 10 Score		7534 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66025 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65854 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=22)	62955 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (20513 - 94254, n=88, last 2 years)	61455 MB/s -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	61181 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55639 MB/s -16%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	70378 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69799 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=22)	63423 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61461 MB/s -12%
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 90142, n=88, last 2 years)	60555 MB/s -13%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	57722 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	69004 MB/s +10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67424 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=22)	66548 MB/s +6%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 95196, n=88, last 2 years)	63628 MB/s +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62984 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58073 MB/s -8%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia (75 - 346, n=87, last 2 years)	102.3 ns * -21%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 ns * -18%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	93.1 ns * -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (82.3 - 102.3, n=22)	90.2 ns * -7%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.9 ns * -3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.5 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

在我们的标准化延迟测试中（网页浏览、YouTube 4K播放、CPU负载），测试设备在目前的BIOS版本下使用实时音频应用程序时显示出轻微的限制。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1273.3 μs *
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1083.5 μs * +15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1003 μs * +21%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	933.2 μs * +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	762.5 μs * +40%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

我们的测试设备配备了美光3400 NVMe固态硬盘，它提供了2TB的存储容量（其中1.79TB在首次启动后可用）。这是一款快速的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘，尽管三星和SK海力士的设备实现了略高的传输率。但这在日常使用中并不发挥主要作用；更重要的是在持续负载下性能保持稳定。更多的SSD基准测试列在这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6571 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5141 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 481 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 485 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 63.7 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 146.5 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 489 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1037 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	85.2 pt
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	79.8 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	72.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	71.9 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W ^-11! Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	70 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	67.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia	61.8 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3873 (3844.57^min - 3872.62^max) MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3564 (3515.46^min - 3563.69^max) MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3540 (3522.04^min - 3539.62^max) MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3455 (3134.4^min - 3455.07^max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (3349 - 3455, n=2)	3402 MB/s -2%
Average of class Multimedia (756 - 4861, n=87, last 2 years)	2872 MB/s -17%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2511 (2497.5^min - 2511.13^max) MB/s -27%
seq write
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (3655 - 4485, n=2)	4070 MB/s +11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3845 (3754.57^min - 3844.71^max) MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	3655 (3362.99^min - 3654.53^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 (3391.93^min - 3530.77^max) MB/s -3%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3335 (3306.37^min - 3334.51^max) MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3172 (3139.23^min - 3171.73^max) MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia (790 - 5709, n=87, last 2 years)	2977 MB/s -19%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6923 (5804.08^min - 6923.33^max) MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6715 (5741.16^min - 6715.28^max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6663 (6017.91^min - 6663.07^max) MB/s +3%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6570 (5809.83^min - 6569.96^max) MB/s +2%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (6449 - 6460, n=2)	6455 MB/s 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	6449 (5385.49^min - 6448.53^max) MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1023 - 7121, n=87, last 2 years)	5217 MB/s -19%
seq q8 t1 write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6104 (6052.8^min - 6104.18^max) MB/s +21%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5182 (5134.05^min - 5181.56^max) MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5063 (4789.75^min - 5062.73^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4980 (4904.66^min - 4979.58^max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4967 (4954.31^min - 4967.1^max) MB/s -2%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (4803 - 5063, n=2)	4933 MB/s -3%
Average of class Multimedia (871 - 6761, n=87, last 2 years)	3947 MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 (79.58^min - 81.23^max) MB/s +17%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	75.2 (69.76^min - 75.19^max) MB/s +8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	73.6 (72.25^min - 73.56^max) MB/s +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	69.5 (67.9^min - 69.5^max) MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (67.9 - 69.5, n=2)	68.7 MB/s -1%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 149.1, n=87, last 2 years)	64.5 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	60.9 (60.82^min - 60.92^max) MB/s -12%
4k q1 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	212 (209.62^min - 211.78^max) MB/s +44%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (147.3 - 253, n=2)	200 MB/s +36%
Average of class Multimedia (80.9 - 378, n=87, last 2 years)	178.7 MB/s +21%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	175.2 (173.12^min - 175.17^max) MB/s +19%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	149.7 (148.15^min - 149.69^max) MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	147.3 (146.61^min - 147.27^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	100.1 (99.4^min - 100.08^max) MB/s -32%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4152 (4133.05^min - 4152.1^max) MB/s +470%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (729 - 3013, n=2)	1871 MB/s +157%
Average of class Multimedia (416 - 4358, n=87, last 2 years)	1350 MB/s +85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1096 (1074.42^min - 1096.28^max) MB/s +50%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	729 (706.66^min - 728.92^max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	681 (654.71^min - 680.72^max) MB/s -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	663 (656.45^min - 663.21^max) MB/s -9%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3512 (3421.77^min - 3511.78^max) MB/s +548%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (542 - 2736, n=2)	1639 MB/s +202%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=87, last 2 years)	1067 MB/s +97%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	542 (534.57^min - 541.67^max) MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	510 (500.59^min - 509.88^max) MB/s -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	477 (463.61^min - 476.76^max) MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	444 (434.07^min - 444.19^max) MB/s -18%

AS SSD
Score Total
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7180 Points +42%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (5068 - 7774, n=2)	6421 Points +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6037 Points +19%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5903 Points +16%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	5068 Points
Average of class Multimedia (2010 - 9972, n=84, last 2 years)	5067 Points 0%
Score Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2858 Points +88%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (1517 - 2959, n=2)	2238 Points +48%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=84, last 2 years)	1695 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1582 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	1517 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1433 Points -6%
Score Write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3834 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3732 Points +25%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (2979 - 3331, n=2)	3155 Points +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2979 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2916 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (545 - 4813, n=84, last 2 years)	2567 Points -14%
Seq Read
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5103.97 MB/s +6%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (4836 - 5126, n=2)	4981 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4975 MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	4836 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4623.95 MB/s -4%
Average of class Multimedia (1192 - 5730, n=84, last 2 years)	4005 MB/s -17%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3551.32 MB/s +669%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2910 MB/s +530%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2808.19 MB/s +508%
Average of class Multimedia (388 - 5175, n=84, last 2 years)	2553 MB/s +453%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (462 - 4546, n=2)	2504 MB/s +442%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	462 MB/s
4K Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	70.4 MB/s +10%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	68.88 MB/s +8%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (64 - 67.7, n=2)	65.9 MB/s +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	64 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (30 - 98.5, n=84, last 2 years)	62.7 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	60.3 MB/s -6%
4K Write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	247.17 MB/s +25%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (197.5 - 207, n=2)	202 MB/s +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	197.5 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=84, last 2 years)	188.5 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	183.9 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	169.2 MB/s -14%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2335.71 MB/s +141%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (969 - 2378, n=2)	1674 MB/s +73%
Average of class Multimedia (413 - 2989, n=84, last 2 years)	1231 MB/s +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1014 MB/s +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	969 MB/s
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	853.63 MB/s -12%
4K-64 Write
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3305.51 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3272 MB/s +20%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	2736 MB/s
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (2669 - 2736, n=2)	2703 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2376.83 MB/s -13%
Average of class Multimedia (281 - 4265, n=84, last 2 years)	2123 MB/s -22%
Access Time Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.083 ms * -277%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.168, n=84, last 2 years)	0.0578 ms * -163%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.03 ms * -36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.025 ms * -14%
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (0.022 - 0.027, n=2)	0.0245 ms * -11%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.022 ms *
Access Time Write
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=84, last 2 years)	0.05992 ms * -200%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.053 ms * -165%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.024 ms * -20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.022 ms * -10%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	0.02 ms *
Average Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH (0.02 - 0.02, n=2)	0.02 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI: Ø6426 (5723.55-6476.01)

图形卡

Nvidia的新GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑带有8GB VRAM的CPU被用作专用显卡。根据驱动程序，我们安装了120瓦的变体，但我们只能从GPU中抽取最多95瓦（在压力测试中短暂的120瓦）。由于GPU在游戏过程中最多只消耗105-110瓦，这并不重要，整体性能非常好，尤其是考虑到14英寸的紧凑机箱。混合模式默认是激活的，但如果需要，也可以完全停用集成GPU（这需要重新启动）。

例如，在合成基准测试中，Zenbook Pro 14也明显比新的RTX 4070笔记本电脑的50瓦变体快（60-80%）。戴尔XPS 15而且总体上也明显快于旧的 RTX 3070 Ti中的 Razer Blade 15.

GPU性能在持续负载下也完全保持稳定，因为它很容易通过Time Spy ，压力测试为99.5%。然而，在电池供电的情况下，GPU性能被限制在60瓦，这使性能降低了约23%。更多的GPU基准测试可在这里.

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	56764 Points +42%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (24229 - 45606, n=49)	40234 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	40004 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	36023 Points -10%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	29908 Points -25%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	24229 Points -39%
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=89, last 2 years)	18929 Points -53%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	42319 Points +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (16212 - 33451, n=48)	29156 Points 0%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	29051 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	27183 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	22184 Points -24%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	16212 Points -44%
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=90, last 2 years)	14005 Points -52%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	17885 Points +57%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (6241 - 13336, n=48)	11728 Points +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	11398 Points
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	10157 Points -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	8129 Points -29%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	6241 Points -45%
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=90, last 2 years)	5310 Points -53%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	34519 Points +63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (17684 - 24275, n=8)	21519 Points +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21125 Points
Average of class Multimedia (1867 - 31403, n=39, last 2 years)	13102 Points -38%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	12968 Points -39%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1028 mpaths +74%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (500 - 686, n=33)	602 mpaths +2%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	592 mpaths
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	547 mpaths -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	445 mpaths -25%
Average of class Multimedia (31 - 684, n=68, last 2 years)	249 mpaths -58%

Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	181222 Points +64%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	116873 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (17391 - 129366, n=47)	112282 Points +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	110733 Points
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	94390 Points -15%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	81359 Points -27%
Average of class Multimedia (10769 - 120093, n=99, last 2 years)	57593 Points -48%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	46941 Points -58%
Metal Score
Average of class Multimedia (34398 - 100376, n=9, last 2 years)	63778 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	52054 Points

Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	160333 Points +59%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (100544 - 120609, n=11)	113594 Points +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	104147 Points +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	100544 Points
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	76719 Points -24%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	74966 Points -25%
Average of class Multimedia (15229 - 119407, n=21, last 2 years)	59963 Points -40%

3DMark 11 Performance		34341 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		25794 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		11666 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom METAL

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 99, n=45, last 2 years)	41.5 Seconds * -80%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	28 Seconds * -22%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	27 Seconds * -17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	26 Seconds * -13%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	23 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (18 - 28, n=47)	21.6 Seconds * +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	13 Seconds * +43%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 172, n=48, last 2 years)	76.5 Seconds * -107%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	50 Seconds * -35%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H	46 Seconds * -24%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H	45 Seconds * -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (32 - 172, n=51)	43.7 Seconds * -18%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	37 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	23 Seconds * +38%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro	97 Seconds *
Average of class Multimedia (29.6 - 132, n=8, last 2 years)	75.6 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

尽管华硕将Zenbook Pro 14宣传为创作者的笔记本电脑，但它也非常适用于游戏。它的性能 RTX 4070 笔记本电脑完全足以在QHD分辨率下进行流畅的游戏，即使在最新的游戏作品中也是如此。在较长的会议中，游戏性能也完全保持稳定。更多的GPU基准测试被列在我们的技术部分.

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.1 pt
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	85.9 pt
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	77.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	76.3 pt
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58.8 pt
Average of class Multimedia	45.3 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	150.6 (142^min, 145^P1) fps +43%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	143.2 fps +36%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105.3 (99^min, 100^P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	96.4 (82^min) fps -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.8 (64^min) fps -34%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)	50.6 fps -52%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.7 (4.18^min, 76.9^P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	114 (8.13^min, 83.3^P1) fps -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	113 (16.1^min, 76.9^P1) fps -4%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	86.5 (7.43^min, 55.6^P1) fps -27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	63.5 (4.22^min, 37^P1) fps -46%
Average of class Multimedia (4.24 - 123, n=88, last 2 years)	56.3 fps -52%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	145.5 fps +34%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	108.3 fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	100.3 fps -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84 fps -22%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66 fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=89, last 2 years)	50.6 fps -53%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	274 (62.8^min, 190^P1) fps +41%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	194 fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	173.4 (30.1^min, 131.1^P1) fps -11%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	155.2 (31.9^min, 117.3^P1) fps -20%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	117.7 (64.5^min, 88.7^P1) fps -39%
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=86, last 2 years)	89.9 fps -54%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	162.2 (139.5^min) fps
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	144.9 (127^min) fps -11%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	137 (116.5^min) fps -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.1 (115.7^min) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	133 (114.4^min) fps -18%
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 171.6, n=90, last 2 years)	101.6 fps -37%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	113.4 fps
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105.4 fps -7%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	104 fps -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	95 fps -16%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.6 fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	82.7 fps -27%
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 131.1, n=95, last 2 years)	68.4 fps -40%

The Witcher 3 | F1 22 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | Far Cry 5

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (123.9 - 268, n=36)	226 fps +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	223 fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	176.6 (154^min) fps -21%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	163.5 fps -27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123.9 (119^min) fps -44%
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=92, last 2 years)	93.9 fps -58%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU	57 fps -74%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	150.6 (142^min, 145^P1) fps +43%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	143.2 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (69.8 - 133.7, n=50)	111.1 fps +6%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	105.3 (99^min, 100^P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	96.4 (82^min) fps -8%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	69.8 (64^min) fps -34%
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU	51 fps -52%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=99, last 2 years)	50.6 fps -52%

F1 22
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98.4 (83^min, 66^P1) fps +37%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (39.2 - 88.7, n=29)	73.8 fps +3%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	71.8 (60^min, 43^P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	65.2 (55^min, 49^P1) fps -9%
Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	52.4 (44^min, 37^P1) fps -27%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	39.2 (15^min, 15^P1) fps -45%
Average of class Multimedia (5.23 - 72.6, n=50, last 2 years)	35.6 fps -50%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	65.9 (57^min, 38^P1) fps +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (10.6 - 58.8, n=28)	47.4 fps +1%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	47.1 (39^min, 37^P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42.3 (36^min, 31^P1) fps -10%
Average of class Multimedia (2.85 - 47.1, n=29, last 2 years)	25.2 fps -46%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10.6 (8^min, 8^P1) fps -77%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	105.43 (41.37^min) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (48 - 110, n=24)	85.4 fps +4%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	82 fps
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	48 (18.9^min) fps -41%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 103, n=44, last 2 years)	45.5 fps -45%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78 (21.57^min) fps +28%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	61 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (30 - 63.9, n=24)	53.4 fps -12%
Average of class Multimedia (15.6 - 89, n=24, last 2 years)	38.7 fps -37%
Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	30 (20.3^min) fps -51%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	130 (99^min) fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (92 - 158, n=28)	129.4 fps +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	126 (99^min) fps +9%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116 fps
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 145, n=59, last 2 years)	70.7 fps -39%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	123 (95^min) fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (79 - 128, n=26)	109.2 fps +15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	100 (90^min) fps +5%
Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95 fps
Average of class Multimedia (18 - 117, n=39, last 2 years)	64.9 fps -32%

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.3 (99-112)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)		184.5	179.4	117.7	86.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)			223	105.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	199.2	182.3	171.5	162.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)		121.8	108.3		79.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	162.3	143.3	113.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)		119	118	116	95
Strange Brigade (2018)		249	215	194	132
F1 2021 (2021)		182.6	162.5	118.4	88.6
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	130	104	89	82	61
F1 22 (2022)		242	182	71.8	47.1

排放--好的扬声器

噪声

对于日常工作（或只要你不需要GPU性能），如果可能的话，你应该使用Whisper 或Standard 模式，因为Zenbook Pro 14然后经常保持沉默。你也应该测试一下标准模式下的游戏，因为在许多情况下，性能仍然足够，而且该设备的噪音略低于41分贝（A），相比之下，性能模式下的噪音略低于49分贝（A），更令人愉快。没有发现其他电子噪音，如线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle		23.3 / 23.3 / 23.3 dB(A)
Load		39.3 / 48.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.3 dB(A)

	Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH	Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z	Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7940HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise		-23%	6%	-12%	8%	-10%
off / environment *	23.3	25.2 -8%	23.9 -3%	23.3 -0%	23.1 1%	26 -12%
Idle Minimum *	23.3	25.2 -8%	23.9 -3%	23.6 -1%	23.1 1%	28 -20%
Idle Average *	23.3	25.2 -8%	23.9 -3%	23.6 -1%	23.1 1%	28 -20%
Idle Maximum *	23.3	32.5 -39%	23.9 -3%	33 -42%	24.2 -4%	28 -20%
Load Average *	39.3	59.7 -52%	26 34%	49.5 -26%	27.1 31%	38.5 2%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48.8			52.2 -7%	40.1 18%
Load Maximum *	48.8	60.9 -25%	43.2 11%	52.2 -7%	44.6 9%	43.9 10%

* ... smaller is better

温度

风扇在空转或轻度任务时经常被停用，但机箱在某些地方确实有点热，大约30℃。尽管如此，华硕还是很好地控制了负载下的温度，因为在压力测试和游戏过程中，键盘区域的最高温度为42℃，保持无害。在底部，有一个热点，在后部中心区域达到最高51℃，所以你应该避免在这里直接接触皮肤。

在压力测试中，显卡的功率大约为75瓦，并保持在这个数值。处理器就比较不稳定了，通常在35瓦左右，并不断有短时的向上峰值。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.2 °C	40.6 °C	38 °C
39 °C	40.4 °C	35.6 °C
28.5 °C	27.8 °C	28.3 °C

Maximum: 40.6 °C
Average: 35.3 °C


44.6 °C	49.5 °C	46.6 °C
42 °C	46.4 °C	41 °C
32.1 °C	33 °C	31.7 °C

Maximum: 49.5 °C
Average: 40.8 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


27.5 °C	28.2 °C	27.7 °C
27.3 °C	28.1 °C	27.7 °C
26 °C	25.5 °C	26.2 °C

Maximum: 28.2 °C
Average: 27.1 °C


30.3 °C	30.3 °C	29.8 °C
30.6 °C	30.5 °C	29.1 °C
27.7 °C	28.1 °C	27.9 °C

Maximum: 30.6 °C
Average: 29.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.2 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.2 °C	41.9 °C	37.7 °C
40.6 °C	41.9 °C	37.4 °C
30.5 °C	28.3 °C	29.1 °C

Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 36.3 °C


45.8 °C	51.1 °C	47.7 °C
40.8 °C	46.2 °C	40.1 °C
32.8 °C	35 °C	33.6 °C

Maximum: 51.1 °C
Average: 41.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41.6 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 31.2 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.6 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.1 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.3 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 31.2 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.5 °C / 86.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.7 °C / -3.1 F).

	Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU	Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		-1%	14%	2%	-7%	-13%
Maximum Upper Side *	40.6	37.1 9%	46.9 -16%	47 -16%	45.6 -12%	49.5 -22%
Maximum Bottom *	49.5	49.4 -0%	41.7 16%	46.5 6%	42 15%	47.5 4%
Idle Upper Side *	28.2	30 -6%	21.4 24%	25.9 8%	34.4 -22%	33.4 -18%
Idle Bottom *	30.6	32.4 -6%	21.4 30%	28 8%	33.2 -8%	35 -14%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

扬声器总体上提供了良好的音质。只有低音可以再强一点。虽然对于偶尔的视频和一些音乐来说绝对足够了，但由于风扇的原因，你最好使用耳机进行游戏。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--120Hz的OLED会消耗大量的电力

消耗功率

OLED屏幕的功耗主要取决于显示的内容。我们测量了在黑暗的标准背景下，空闲时的最大功率略低于12瓦，但在有明亮的图片时，这个功率会进一步增加。一旦你观看HDR内容，消耗率会增加到28瓦。在压力测试中，我们登记的功率短时间内高达208瓦，但这很快就平息在~140瓦（也适用于游戏）。总体而言，200瓦的电源是足够的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.1 Watt
Idle	7.5 / 11.1 / 11.6 Watt
Load	91.9 / 208 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50	Asus ZenBook Pro 14 Duo UX8402VV-P1021W i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.50	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.20	Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 14.00	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, OLED, 3456x2160, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		2%	35%	-17%	-44%	-134%	-47%	6%
Idle Minimum *	7.5	8.5 -13%	2.4 68%	9.4 -25%	20 -167%	31.6 -321%	12.1 ?(4.3 - 26.7, n=41) -61%	7.29 ?(2.2 - 34.6, n=96, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Average *	11.1	8.8 21%	11.3 -2%	14.2 -28%	20.7 -86%	33.3 -200%	16.9 ?(4.6 - 34.1, n=41) -52%	11.8 ?(4.6 - 43, n=96, last 2 years) -6%
Idle Maximum *	11.6	16.5 -42%	11.5 1%	14.5 -25%	22.4 -93%	38.6 -233%	24.1 ?(9 - 55.4, n=41) -108%	14.6 ?(5.6 - 44.9, n=96, last 2 years) -26%
Load Average *	91.9	102 -11%	59.6 35%	79 14%	77.1 16%	149 -62%	99 ?(59.2 - 178, n=40) -8%	77.7 ?(14.3 - 147, n=95, last 2 years) 15%
Witcher 3 ultra *	132.2	101.2 23%	55.9 58%	172 -30%	95.4 28%	149.6 -13%
Load Maximum *	208	140 33%	100 52%	220.8 -6%	133.4 36%	160 23%	220 ?(107 - 319, n=40) -6%	121 ?(47.7 - 247, n=95, last 2 years) 42%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø132.2 (129.8-137.2)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø141.7 (129.8-208)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø10.1 (6.56-14.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø112.9 (90.2-170)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø166 (158.8-168)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø53.6 (48.8-77.8)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø141.2 (127.5-167.3)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø118.6 (114.5-140)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø127.9 (118.7-132)

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø13.3 (8.96-21.6)

电池寿命

76Wh的电池只能提供平均的电池运行时间，因为OLED屏幕需要大量的电力。我们在60赫兹下进行了测试（对于120赫兹，你可以减去大约半小时）。视频播放在150cd/m²（相当于测试设备中最大SDR亮度的73%）下运行了8.5小时，但在WLAN测试中只有7.5小时，或者在全亮度下只有不到6小时。一段最大亮度的HDR YouTube视频在3.5小时内耗尽了电池。MacBook Pro 14在各方面的持续时间要长得多。

当设备开机时，充满电大约需要105分钟；不到半小时就可以使用50%的容量。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 112)		7h 36min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 112)		5h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 31min
Load (maximum brightness)		0h 58min

	Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, 70 Wh	Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 GA402XY R9 7940HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh	Dell XPS 15 9530 RTX 4070 i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 86 Wh	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		59%	-6%	29%	15%	44%
H.264	511	917 79%	431 -16%		352 -31%	710 ?(319 - 1481, n=53, last 2 years) 39%
WiFi v1.3	456	807 77%	448 -2%	481 5%	274 -40%	572 ?(274 - 1204, n=95, last 2 years) 25%
Load	58	70 21%	58 0%	89 53%	125 116%	97.7 ?(39 - 215, n=76, last 2 years) 68%

Pros

+ 高质量的外壳

+ 快速的硬件组件

+ 系统性能高

+ 大量的端口和快速的SD阅读器

+ 具有120赫兹的OLED面板，色彩表现准确

+ 包括手写笔

+ 针对PWM的软件解决方案

Cons

- 颗粒感最小的图片质量

- 16GB内存是焊接的

- DialPad只是一个噱头

- 在电池模式下性能明显下降

- 带PWM的OLED

结论 - Zenbook Pro 14提供了很多性能，但必须做出一些妥协

华硕新的Zenbook Pro 14是一款强大的14英寸设备，面向创意用户，因此与Apple MacBook Pro 14直接竞争。因此，制造商安装了英特尔和Nvidia的最新组件：无论是酷睿i9-13900H和 GeForce RTX 4070 笔记本电脑为这样一个紧凑的设备提供了大量的性能。Zenbook的性能也明显高于大型多媒体笔记本电脑，如新的 XPS 15 von Dell来自戴尔。

采用了一块120赫兹的OLED屏幕作为显示屏。主观的图像质量总体上非常好，但由于触摸屏的原因，明亮的地方会出现轻微的颗粒感。此外，PMW是从50%及以下的亮度开始使用的。与其他华硕OLED笔记本电脑一样，有一个软件功能允许OLED在没有PWM的情况下变暗，但用户每次都必须通过软件激活。各种颜色配置文件非常好；尤其是Display P3非常准确，不需要后续校准。然而，颜色配置文件在HDR模式下是不可用的，HDR功能在Apple MacBook Pro中简直好用得多，其迷你LED面板也能实现明显的高亮度值。

重点是性能：由于英特尔酷睿i9-13900H和NvidiaGeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU，新的Zenbook Pro是一个非常快的14英寸笔记本。然而，OLED屏幕的画质颗粒度很小，在电池寿命方面也必须做出妥协。

该设备明显比许多其他14英寸笔记本电脑更笨重，但组件的冷却效果足够好，而且有足够的端口。由于采用了锥形的基本单元，制造商还很好地隐藏了外壳的厚度。然而，为了充分发挥GeForce RTX 4070的性能，用户需要激活性能模式，在该模式下，风扇的声音明显变大。

键盘也只是平均水平，考虑到高昂的购买价格，这有点让人失望。触摸板左上方的额外DialPad也更像是一个噱头。Adobe应用程序的实施效果非常好，但最终，快捷键和组合键的效果更快。默认情况下，屏幕亮度和音量也可以用DialPad来调整，但这也可以通过专用的特殊键来更快地工作。另一个缺点是电池寿命（尤其是在激活120赫兹的情况下），更不用说价格了，在我们的案例中，价格高达 3,500欧元（约合3,750.00美元）。

一个大的竞争者当然是 Apple MacBook Pro 14在原始CPU和GPU性能方面有劣势，但总体上是更好的笔记本电脑。此外，如果你还想用笔记本来玩当前的游戏，那么MacBook并不是一个理想的选择。另一个有趣的竞争者来自华硕本身：虽然 ROG Zephyrus G14主要是一台游戏机，但它也同样可以用于创作目的（也可使用RTX 4070笔记本GPU）。哑光迷你LED或IPS面板（取决于配置）甚至赋予了OLED屏幕的一些优势。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED的全球供应似乎有限。这款笔记本电脑在华硕的estore上售价为1799.99美元，但目前已经断货。

价格和供应情况截至12.06.2023，可能会有变化。

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI - 2023-06-09 06/09/2023 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

87 / 98 → 89%

Keyboard

86%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

66 / 80 → 82%

Weight

67 / 20-72 → 90%

Battery

77 / 95 → 81%

Display

91%

Games Performance

99 / 90 → 100%

Application Performance

94 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

87%

Noise

88 / 95 → 92%

Audio

84%

Camera

36 / 85 → 43%

Average

81%

89%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 915 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 389876 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED笔记本电脑回顾：配备120赫兹OLED显示屏的MacBook Pro竞争对手

Andreas Osthoff, 2023-06-13 (Update: 2023-06-13)

华硕Zenbook Pro 14 OLED笔记本电脑回顾：配备120赫兹OLED显示屏的MacBook Pro竞争对手

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳--Zenbook采用坚固的金属底盘

尺寸比较

设备 - 华硕安装了所有重要的端口

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备 - 带有拨号板的触摸板

键盘

触摸板和手写笔

显示屏 - 120赫兹OLED触摸屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 酷睿i9和RTX 4070笔记本GPU

测试条件

处理器 - 英特尔酷睿i9 13900H

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延时

存储设备

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放--好的扬声器

噪声

温度

发言人

Asus Zenbook Pro 14 OLED UX6404VI audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro audio analysis

能源管理--120Hz的OLED会消耗大量的电力

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - Zenbook Pro 14提供了很多性能，但必须做出一些妥协

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Pricecompare