Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

酷睿至尊 7 256V是 Lunar Lake 系列的中高端处理器。这是一款用于笔记本电脑和平板电脑的 SoC，采用了 4 个新的 E 核和 4 个新的 P 核，主频从 2.2 GHz 到 4.8 GHz 不等。 Arc 140ViGPU 和 16GB 内置 LPDDR5x-8533 内存。此外，还包括一个新的 47 TOPS 神经引擎、雷电 4 和 PCIe 5 固态硬盘支持。

该芯片与 超 7 258V的唯一区别是封装内存的数量：分别为 16 GB 和 32 GB。

架构和功能

Lunar Lake 采用 Foveros 技术（将多个芯片堆叠在一起，彼此相邻），就像 Meteor Lake 一样。这些新芯片使用了巨大的 BGA2833 插座接口；Lion Cove P 核心取代了 Redwood 核心，而 Crestwood E 核心则被 Skymont 所取代，据说后者非常省电，使得 Meteor Lake 多出的 2 个低功耗岛 CPU 核心完全多余。在这 8 个内核中，没有一个支持超线程技术，这与 AMD 目前的 Zen 5/5c 芯片正好相反。

英特尔声称，Lion Cove 内核的 IPC 性能提高了 14%。而 Skymont 则提高了 68%。此外，英特尔还在其他方面进行了改进，例如低延迟架构（Low Latency Fabric），它可以大大加快内核/缓存之间的小数据传输。在其他方面，256V 拥有 4 条 PCIe 5 和 4 条 PCIe 4 通道，可连接各种设备，包括速度高达 15.75 GB/s 的 NVMe SSD。默认板载支持 Thunderbolt 4，支持英特尔的 CNVi WiFi 7 + BT 5.4 卡。47 TOPS AI Boost 神经引擎以及威胁检测等技术的加入，使 Windows Defender 等支持 AI 的应用更加强大。

这款第 2 代酷睿 Ultra 处理器配备了 16 GB 包装内不可更换的 LPDDR5x-8533 内存。

性能

该芯片的高效内核运行频率高达 3.7 GHz。P 核心的主频则高达 4.8GHz。

如果我们的首次内部测试显示出任何迹象，256V 的性能与较早的 U 级 AMD 和英特尔芯片（如 Ryzen 7 6800U和 酷睿 i7-1355U在多线程性能方面。就 2024 年第四季度而言，这是一个可以使用但并不出色的结果。

图形性能

显卡 Arc Graphics 140V已取代 8 核 ArciGPU。它的 8 个 Xe² 架构内核运行频率高达 1,950 MHz，还拥有 8 个光线追踪单元。适配器支持 DirectX 12 Ultimate，能够对 h.266 VVC、h.265 HEVC、h.264 AVC、AV1 和 VP9 等一系列流行视频编解码器进行硬件解码。该 iGPU 可同时使用三台 SUHD 4320p 显示器。

其实际性能仅略高于 Radeon 780M在低图形设置下以 1080p 处理任何 2024 游戏的帧速率时，其实际性能仅略高于 Radeon 780M。

功耗

大多数 Lunar Lake 处理器的长期功耗目标应该是 17 W。与此同时，英特尔建议该芯片的短期 PL 值为 37 W。

CodenameLunar Lake
SeriesIntel Lunar Lake

Series: Lunar Lake Lunar Lake

Intel Core Ultra 9 288V3.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 268V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 266V2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V « 2.2 - 4.8 GHz8 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 238V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 236V2.1 - 4.7 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 228V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 226V2.1 - 4.5 GHz8 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Clock Rate2200 - 4800 MHz
Level 1 Cache1.4 MB
Level 2 Cache14 MB
Level 3 Cache12 MB
Number of Cores / Threads8 / 8
4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
4 x 3.7 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)17 Watt
TDP Turbo PL237 Watt
Manufacturing Technology3 nm
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketBGA2833
FeaturesLPDDR5x-8533 RAM, PCIe 5 + PCIe 4, USB 4, AI Boost NPU (47 TOPS), Thread Director, PSE, Threat Detection, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX-VNNi, FMA3, SHA
GPUIntel Arc Graphics 140V ( - 1950 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Announcement Date09/03/2024
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
38.3 pt (64%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -94%
...
Intel Core i9-13905H
37.8 -1%
Intel Core i7-1365U
37.8 -1%
Intel Core i5-13450HX
37.8 -1%
Intel Core 5 220H
37.8 -1%
AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS
37.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
37.9 -1%
AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
38.2 0%
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
38.2 0%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
38.3 0%
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
38.3
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
38.4 0%
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.4 0%
Intel Core i7-12700H
38.5 1%
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
38.5 1%
AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
38.6 1%
AMD Ryzen 5 8645HS
38.6 1%
Intel Core i5-13500HX
38.7 1%
Intel Core i7-12800H
38.7 1%
Intel Core i7-13620H
38.8 1%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX
50.1 31%
max:
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.2 57%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
min: 117.4     avg: 119.1     median: 119.1 (67%)     max: 120.9 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
min: 435     avg: 547     median: 557.5 (10%)     max: 630 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 8589     avg: 10065     median: 10391 (10%)     max: 10768 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1799     avg: 1859     median: 1875 (79%)     max: 1902 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 700     avg: 717     median: 721 (79%)     max: 730 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 3822     avg: 4006     median: 4026.5 (10%)     max: 4162 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1500     avg: 1567     median: 1570 (10%)     max: 1627 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
08517025534042551059568076585093510201105119012751360144515301615Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 275     avg: 282.4     median: 285 (79%)     max: 290 Points
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 33926     avg: 35427     median: 35742.5 (21%)     max: 36072 MIPS
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 5528     avg: 5650     median: 5665 (67%)     max: 5749 MIPS
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 11.9     avg: 12.8     median: 12.9 (23%)     max: 13.5 fps
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 533     avg: 577     median: 582.5 (7%)     max: 616 Seconds
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 324     avg: 344.5     median: 338 (2%)     max: 373 Seconds
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.439     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (10%)     max: 0.4645 sec
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 14943     avg: 15205     median: 15217.5 (37%)     max: 15389 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 13840     avg: 14107     median: 13988 (35%)     max: 14493 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 14488     avg: 19749     median: 21097 (38%)     max: 22257 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 4853     avg: 6417     median: 6502 (27%)     max: 7490 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 2680     avg: 2746     median: 2748 (69%)     max: 2784 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 9852     avg: 10801     median: 10952 (43%)     max: 11085 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1972     avg: 1997     median: 2000 (78%)     max: 2013 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 9302     avg: 9537     median: 9591 (17%)     max: 9715 points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 470     avg: 473.3     median: 472.5 (1%)     max: 480 ms
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 281.6     avg: 284.3     median: 284.5 (78%)     max: 286 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 243     avg: 295.2     median: 304.5 (55%)     max: 310 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1636     avg: 1685     median: 1681 (63%)     max: 1736 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.1     avg: 44.3     median: 43 (7%)     max: 53.6 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 48.3     avg: 51.9     median: 51.2 (9%)     max: 57.1 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 1.596     avg: 3.4     median: 3.6 (2%)     max: 4.42 Watt
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
012345Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.954     avg: 4.7     median: 5.3 (6%)     max: 5.91 Watt
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01234567891011121314Tooltip
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 30.6     avg: 30.8     median: 30.8 (23%)     max: 31.1 Points per Watt
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.33
log 14. 00:00:14

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 13 Jun 2025 05:35:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.014s ... 0.015s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#7 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#8 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.016s

#9 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#10 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.017s

#12 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.018s

#13 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#14 getting avg benchmarks for device 17996 +0.016s ... 0.034s

#15 got single benchmarks 17996 +0.02s ... 0.054s

#16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.598s ... 0.653s

#18 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.653s

#19 return log +0s ... 0.653s

Reviews for the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V processor

戴尔 16 Plus 笔记本电脑评测：向 Inspiron 系列挥手告别

戴尔 16 Plus 笔记本电脑评测：向 Inspiron 系列挥手告别

戴尔 16 Plus 是该制造商最新推出的大众市场中端机型，配备了英特尔 Lunar Lake 处理器和 1600p IPS 显示屏。虽然名称和品牌都是全新的，但 Inspiron 的影响却清晰而熟悉。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 16.00" | 1.8 kg
戴尔 14 Plus 笔记本电脑评测：耳熟能详的新名字

戴尔 14 Plus 笔记本电脑评测：耳熟能详的新名字

不要被新的简短名称所迷惑。戴尔 14 Plus 是 Inspiron 的进化版，具备家庭用户所需的所有基本功能，而且起价合理。
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
联想 Yoga 7 二合一 16ILL10 评测：正确位置的小更新

联想 Yoga 7 二合一 16ILL10 评测：正确位置的小更新

与去年的 Yoga 7 2-in-1 16IML9 相比，Yoga 7 2-in-1 16ILL10 看起来只是简单的处理器更新，但实际上它还进行了其他几处改动，真正提高了这款 16 英寸可转换机的可用性。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
轻便省电，20 小时续航 - LG Gram Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测

轻便省电，20 小时续航 - LG Gram Pro 16 笔记本电脑评测

作为一款搭载强劲酷睿 Ultra 7 处理器的 "长跑者"，LG Gram Pro 16 是旅行中的强力伴侣。不过，这款笔记本电脑在家庭娱乐中的出色音质和画面同样令人印象深刻。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 16.00" | 1.2 kg
戴尔 XPS 13 9350 笔记本电脑评测：英特尔 "月亮湖 "完美契合

戴尔 XPS 13 9350 笔记本电脑评测：英特尔 "月亮湖 "完美契合

与 XPS 13 9340 相比，新的英特尔 CPU 提供了更稳定的处理器性能，同时电池续航时间和图形处理能力也有了大幅提升。这些变化有助于使 XPS 13 成为 MacBook Air 13 系列更好的竞争者。...
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 13.40" | 1.2 kg

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
  Review » 英特尔酷睿 Ultra 7 256V 性能首次亮相：联想 Yoga Slim 7 15 Aura 笔记本电脑评测

Samsung Galaxy Book5 360: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 15.60", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 360

Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 14.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Asus VivoBook 14 Flip TP3407SA

Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 7 256V: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 16.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 16 AI SF16-51, Ultra 7 256V

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP960: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 16.00", 1.6 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro NP960

Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA, Ultra 7 256V: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Asus Vivobook S 14 OLED S5406SA, Ultra 7 256V

Dell XPS 13 9350: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 13.40", 1.2 kg
  External Review » Dell XPS 13 9350

Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360

Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 15.30", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 15ILL9 Aura

Dell 16 Plus: Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 16.00", 1.8 kg
   » 定制订单，避免高价购买戴尔 16 Plus

   » 戴尔 16 Plus 与 Inspiron 16 Plus：旧版更快更便宜，显示屏完全相同

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Lunar Lake

» Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 268V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 266V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 238V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 236V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.7 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 228V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 5 226V
   8x 2.1 GHz - 4.5 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen AI 5 340
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340
   6x 2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS
   6x 4.3 GHz - 5 GHz
+ Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
» Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
   8x 2.2 GHz - 4.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 250
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 8840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen Z2
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
   8x 3.3 GHz - 5.1 GHz
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-10-31)