Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i9-14900K

Intel i9-14900K

英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K是一款基于 Raptor Lake 架构的高端处理器，与去年的英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 类似。基础主频为 3.2 GHz，在最佳状态下最高可达 6 GHz。总共 32 个线程仍分为 8 个 P 核心和 16 个 E 核心。8 个性能核心（P 核心）还提供超线程功能，这意味着总共 32 个线程可与 16 个高能效 E 核心同时处理。和以前一样，K 型号继续提供可自由选择的倍频，从而简化了超频。英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 使用与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 相同的 CPU 插座（LGA 1700）。这意味着你不一定需要新的主板，因为 600 系列芯片组在 BIOS 更新后就能支持新的处理器。此外，还可以选择使用 DDR4 内存。

性能

与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 相比，酷睿 i9-14900K 仍提供 8 个 P 核心，并通过 16 个额外的 E 核心来缓解苛刻应用的需求，从而确保极高的多线程性能。不过，相比之下，英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 只能略胜一筹。E 核心主要负责后台应用。混合架构依靠英特尔线程管理器（Thread Director）负责任务的正确分配。同时，IPC 只能略有提高。作为英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 的一项创新，制造商越来越多地依赖人工智能，它也被用于超频。只需点击一下英特尔极速实用程序，该工具就能检查整个系统并进行必要的设置。

图形单元

与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 一样，英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 也提供集成图形单元。英特尔 Iris Xe 架构仍是其基础。不过，在性能方面，IntelUHD Graphics 770 没有任何变化。

功耗

英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 的 TDP 值为 125 瓦，相当于 PL1 值。在 Boost 模式下，处理器的性能最高可达 253 瓦（PL2）。不过，这需要非常好的散热。与英特尔酷睿 i9-13900K 处理器相比，如果遵守限制，指定功耗不会增加。如果取消限制，情况就不同了。由于该值取决于整个系统，我们无法对此做出准确的判断。

SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-R
CodenameRaptor Lake

Series: Raptor Lake-R Raptor Lake

Intel Core i9-14900K « 3.2 - 6 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14700K2.5 - 5.6 GHz20 / 28 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14600K3.5 - 5.3 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Clock Rate3200 - 6000 MHz
Level 2 Cache32 MB
Level 3 Cache36 MB
Number of Cores / Threads24 / 32
8 x 6.0 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
16 x 4.4 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
Power Consumption (TDP = Thermal Design Power)125 Watt
Manufacturing Technology10 nm
Die Size257 mm2
Max. Temperature100 °C
SocketLGA 1700
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/s
GPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1650 MHz)
64 Bit64 Bit support
Architecturex86
Starting Price$589 U.S.
Announcement Date10/17/2023
Product Link (external)ark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU
61.7 pt (86%)
AMD E1-2100
2.47 -96%
...
Intel Core i9-13980HX
54.5 -12%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
55 -11%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
56.8 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
57 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
57.1 -7%
Intel Core i7-14700K
57.8 -6%
Intel Core i9-13900K
59.3 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
60.4 -2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
61.1 -1%
Intel Core i9-14900K
61.7
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
72.1 17%
0%
100%
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Single Core
min: 134     avg: 136     median: 136 (94%)     max: 138 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench 2024 - CB24 CPU Multi Core
min: 2112     avg: 2202     median: 2142 (40%)     max: 2352 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
41193 Points (38%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD E1-2100
202 -100%
...
Intel Core i9-13950HX
29352 -29%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
30428 -26%
Intel Core i7-13700K
30745 -25%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
32782 -20%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
33960 -18%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
35794 -13%
Intel Core i7-14700K
35892 -13%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
36291 -12%
Intel Core i9-13900K
37310 -9%
Intel Core i9-14900K
41193
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
42744 4%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
61102 48%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
107681 161%
0%
100%
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2351 Points (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A10-5745M
74.4 -97%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
2053 -13%
Intel Core i5-14600K
2064 -12%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2067 -12%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
2081 -11%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
2103 -11%
Intel Core i7-13700K
2116 -10%
Intel Core i7-14700K
2153 -8%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2174 -8%
Intel Core i9-13900K
2238 -5%
Intel Core i9-14900K
2351
0%
100%
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
900 Points (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
15466 Points (38%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
6282 Points (40%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
31 -100%
...
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4565 -27%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
4724 -25%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
4818 -23%
Intel Core i7-14700K
5459 -13%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX
5497 -12%
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
5600 -11%
Intel Core i9-13900K
5798 -8%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
5835 -7%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
5974 -5%
Intel Core i9-14900K
6282
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
7053 12%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
9706 55%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
15842 152%
0%
100%
03106209301240155018602170248027903100341037204030434046504960527055805890Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
332 Points (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD A4-1200
19 -94%
...
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
311 -6%
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
313.7 -6%
Intel Core i7-14700K
314 -5%
Intel Core i9-13900K
314.1 -5%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
315 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
315 -5%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
318 -4%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
322.2 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
326 -2%
Intel Core i9-14900K
332
0%
100%
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
72.2 Points (94%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
4 Points (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
12643 points (76%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
94801 points (69%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144156 Points (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18511 Points (23%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
74.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
2.1 s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
16108 points (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multli Thread 4 runs
min: 145144     avg: 146282     median: 145207 (83%)     max: 149570 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 7772     avg: 7893     median: 7932 (95%)     max: 7934 MIPS
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 75.9     avg: 181.2     median: 181.2 (63%)     max: 286.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 257.5     avg: 345.5     median: 345.5 (80%)     max: 433.5 fps
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 40.8     avg: 41.4     median: 41.1 (72%)     max: 42.8 fps
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
2.8 GB/s (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
5.8 GB/s (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
26.7 GB/s (70%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
min: 135     avg: 143.4     median: 145 (2%)     max: 147 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 80     avg: 84.6     median: 85 (1%)     max: 87 Seconds
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.3425     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (7%)     max: 0.3504 sec
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 20532     avg: 22259     median: 22810 (49%)     max: 22928 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
5.5 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
12 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
280.3 s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 92276     avg: 107364     median: 112312 (98%)     max: 114209 Points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 28587     avg: 31277     median: 31478 (85%)     max: 32853 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 89084     avg: 105085     median: 106076 (86%)     max: 111347 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 88682     avg: 105426     median: 106516 (86%)     max: 110989 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 90865     avg: 106868     median: 108898 (92%)     max: 110670 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 27678     avg: 29284     median: 29494 (75%)     max: 30143 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 48193     avg: 53740     median: 54370.5 (97%)     max: 56087 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 19418     avg: 22190     median: 22662.5 (96%)     max: 23721 Points
+ 10 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 3108     avg: 3217     median: 3243 (98%)     max: 3294 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 20435     avg: 21200     median: 21320 (84%)     max: 21678 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2243     avg: 2340     median: 2369 (100%)     max: 2370 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 24552     avg: 25133     median: 25199 (45%)     max: 25867 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2177     avg: 2236     median: 2247 (10%)     max: 2272 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 23151     avg: 24518     median: 24467 (77%)     max: 25459 points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 9620     avg: 9868     median: 9872.5 (99%)     max: 10009 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 82660     avg: 87253     median: 87879 (98%)     max: 89177 points
+ 8 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 413     avg: 415     median: 414 (0%)     max: 418 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 332     avg: 334.7     median: 334 (96%)     max: 338 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 371     avg: 388.3     median: 386 (80%)     max: 410 Points
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2552     avg: 2586     median: 2594 (99%)     max: 2611 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
537 Watt (93%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
548 Watt (100%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0306090120150180210240270300330360390420450480510540Tooltip
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 67.4     avg: 83.5     median: 77.9 (51%)     max: 151.2 Watt
+ 30 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

v1.26
log 25. 18:18:44

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0.012s ... 0.013s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 0.013s

#5 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.014s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.014s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15092 +0.017s ... 0.031s

#8 got single benchmarks 15092 +0.07s ... 0.101s

#9 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.101s

#10 min, max, avg, median took s +1.109s ... 1.21s

#11 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_2 needed +0s ... 1.21s

#12 return log +0s ... 1.21s

Reviews for the Intel Core i9-14900K processor

Sparkle 英特尔 Arc A380 Elf 台式机显卡评测--英特尔 129 欧元的经济型 GPU 能带给您什么？

Sparkle 英特尔 Arc A380 Elf 台式机显卡评测--英特尔 129 欧元的经济型 GPU 能带给您什么？

对于那些敢于给英特尔作为台式机 GPU 制造商一个机会的人来说，现在有了英特尔 Arc A380。你只需支付相对较低的价格，就能获得一块小型显卡和 6GB 的 VRAM，不过你不应该对游戏性能抱太高的期望。我们对这款价格实惠的英特尔显卡 Sparkle Arc A380 Elf 的性能进行了仔细研究，并通过大量基准测试...
Intel Core i9-14900K | Intel Arc A380 | 0.00" | 415 g
华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 台式机显卡评测--英特尔预算内 GPU，支持 1080p 游戏，售价低于 200 美元

华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 台式机显卡评测--英特尔预算内 GPU，支持 1080p 游戏，售价低于 200 美元

英特尔的 Arc A580 旨在成为 Arc A700 GPU 的经济型替代产品。当然，作为一款售价低于 200 美元的组件，它的性能并不尽如人意。在本次评测中，我们将以华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 为例，来看看英特尔 Arc A580 在运行当前游戏和旧版游戏时的性能表现。...
Intel Core i9-14900K | Intel Arc A580 | 0.00" | 807 g
松景 Speedster MERC 310 Radeon RX 7900 XTX 黑色版

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 24 GB VRAM 评论：售价已低于 1000 欧元

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 上架一年多了。最近，随着 Nvidia 超级显卡的上市，它的价格有所下调，给 Nvidia 造成了一定的压力。借此机会，我们再次对 AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX 进行一次性能评估。是 AMD 24GB 显卡物有所值，还是 Nvidia 显卡的整体性能更胜一筹...
Intel Core i9-14900K | AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 0.00" | 1.9 kg
KFA2GeForce RTX 4080 Super SG

KFA2GeForce RTX 4080 超级 SG 评测：巨大的 Nvidia 桌面显卡可使用四个风扇散热

GeForce RTX 4080 Super 是 Nividia 当前 Ada Lovelace 更新中速度最快的机型，纸面性能比前代机型更强。新机型甚至还进行了降价。我们对 KFA2GeForce RTX 4080 Super SG 进行了测试，分析其性能究竟如何。...
Intel Core i9-14900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super | 0.00" | 1.9 kg
Zotac GamingGeForce RTX 4080 超级三位一体黑色版

NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 Super 16 GB 评测：用同样的钱提高性能 - 承诺，承诺...

NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080 Super 是新一代 ADA 显卡中最后一款带有 Super 后缀的型号，将是我们评测的重点。我们对 Zotac GamingGeForce RTX 4080 Super Trinity Black Edition 进行了进一步的详细测试，并评估了该型号在最近大多数游戏中的...
Intel Core i9-14900K | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Super | 0.00" | 1.1 kg

Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090, 0.00"
  Review » 英特尔酷睿 i9-14900K 和英特尔酷睿 i5-14600K 评测--与 AMD X3D 处理器的 6 GHz 开箱频率对决

Please share our article, every link counts!

»移动处理器 对比
所有移动处理器的对比


»移动处理器 基准测试
所有已有笔记本电脑中使用的处理器的基准测试成绩 (桌面处理器或移动处理器)

Other CPUs of the series Raptor Lake-R

» Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
» Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
» Intel Core i5-14600K
   14x 3.5 GHz - 5.3 GHz

Surrounding CPUs

+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
   96x 2.5 GHz - 5.1 GHz
+ AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
   64x 2.7 GHz - 4.2 GHz
» Intel Core i9-14900K
   24x 3.2 GHz - 6 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
   16x 4.5 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- Intel Core i9-13900K
   24x 3 GHz - 5.8 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
   16x 4.2 GHz - 5.7 GHz
- Intel Core i7-14700K
   20x 2.5 GHz - 5.6 GHz
- AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
   12x 4.7 GHz - 5.6 GHz
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动处理器 —— 基准测试成绩列表 > Intel Raptor Lake-R i9-14900K 笔记本处理器
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-01- 9)