Notebookcheck Logo

华硕ROG Zephyrus M16(2023)笔记本电脑评测:RTX 4090与超亮的Mini-LED显示屏

的ROG。 新的华硕M16有三个变体:有RTX 4070、RTX 4080或RTX 4090。我们审查的是最高端的配置。除此之外,其明亮的、16:10、HDR、Mini-LED背光显示屏也是新的。我们来看看4000美元的ROG M16在现实生活中是否和纸面上一样令人印象深刻。
Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Raptor Lake

作为 "老 "一代CPU/GPU的最后一个例子,我们最近审查了 ROG Zephyrus M16它配备了一个酷睿i9-12900H和一个RTX 3070 Ti.但现在,M16的外形已经发生了变化,这次配备的是酷睿i9-13900H和一个RTX 4090装在一个 "AniMe Matrix "机箱内。后者略有变化,因为矩阵变得更加精细。我们已经详细了解了这些变化,并调查了M16是否能与RTX 4090相处。

不言而喻,我们将新设备与前代产品以及其他高端游戏机进行了比较。由于RTX 4090通常出现在较大的笔记本电脑中,我们还看了18英寸的华硕ROG Strix Scar 18或17英寸的MSI Titan GT77.我们还考虑了这两款 联想Legion Pro 7 16IRXRazer Blade 16都是竞争对手。

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X (ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 100 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 150 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 528.49, Optimus, MUX Switch
Memory
64 GB 
, 2x 32 GB Samsung DDR5-4800
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE0B74 (NE160QDM-NM4, IPS, ROG Nebula HDR Display, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB 
, 920 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 1x 3.5mm Combo Audio Jack, Card Reader: microSD
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22.9 x 355 x 246
Battery
90 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 1080P FHD IR Camera for Windows Hello
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2x 2W Tweeter plus 2x 2W woofer, Keyboard: Chiclet RGB, Keyboard Light: yes, bagpack, mouse, headset, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.3 kg, Power Supply: 800 g
Price
4500 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
89.4 %
03/2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.8 %
02/2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.6 %
02/2023
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg30.8 mm18.00"2560x1600
89 %
02/2023
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
3.5 kg23 mm17.30"3840x2160
89.4 %
02/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg26 mm16.00"2560x1600
91.2 %
02/2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.99 mm16.00"2560x1600
显示器盖子上的可定制的AniMe矩阵
显示器盖子上的可定制的AniMe矩阵

顶面的所谓AniMe矩阵比以前更精细、更详细,可以显示简单、移动的标识或带有附加效果的文字。一方面,这很酷,但它不仅可能增加设备的功耗,而且当笔记本电脑打开时,用户基本上看不到它。出于这个原因,这种效果更多是为了给旁观者留下深刻印象。

我们对盖子后部顶部的空白黑色塑料条没有印象。它看起来有些廉价,不是很稳定,而且已经开始出现磨损的迹象。总而言之,几乎所有侧面的通风格栅都有轻微改变,端口位置也是如此。

左边是旧M16,右边是新M16
左边是旧M16,右边是新M16
M16顶部的塑料条
M16顶部的塑料条
设计上的变化也在后面
设计上的变化也在后面

底座似乎很坚固,但在试图扭转箱子时,吱吱嘎嘎的声音相当大。同样,显示屏的盖子也是如此,它很容易被弯曲。铰链将显示器固定得相当牢固,并确保盖子可以打开到180度的角度。打开笔记本时,有两件事向用户展示了自己--键盘略微抬起,显示屏边框相当纤细。

不寻常的是,与前代产品相比,该设备的占地面积有所增加。 前代产品.与使设备更小、更薄、更轻的趋势相反,新的M16略大,而且比上一代机型厚3毫米。

这款Razer Blade 16只薄了1毫米,而联想Legion Pro 7略厚,这意味着新的M16处于中间位置,在重量方面也是如此。

尺寸比较

363 mm 262 mm 26 mm 2.7 kg355 mm 246 mm 22.9 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 244 mm 21.99 mm 2.4 kg355 mm 243 mm 19.9 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

特点 - 一个没有LAN端口的游戏机

在这个领域,也不是一切都变好了:局域网端口被简单地省略了,这意味着对于那些寻求最短延迟和最快连接的游戏玩家来说,只有通过适配器才能实现快速的互联网连接。

其中一个USB-C端口已经从左侧游走到右侧。这意味着设备的左侧有更多的空间。在后面,你仍然只能找到风扇格栅,这导致缺乏空间容纳更多的连接器,如HDMI或缺少的LAN端口。

左边:电源、带DP和PD的雷电4、HDMI、USB-A 3.2 Gen2、耳机插孔
左边:电源、带DP和PD的雷电4、HDMI、USB-A 3.2 Gen2、耳机插孔
右边:microSD读卡器,USB-C 3.2 Gen2带DP和PD,USB-A 3.2 Gen2,Kensington锁
右边:microSD读卡器,USB-C 3.2 Gen2带DP和PD,USB-A 3.2 Gen2,Kensington锁

SD卡阅读器

至少这台笔记本电脑配备了一个内置的SD卡读卡器,虽然不幸的是这只用于microSD卡,但它仍然非常快。我们能够使用AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡在6秒内将一个1GB的图像复制到桌面上。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
185.7 (176.29min - 198.35max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.1 (127.28min - 140.64max) MB/s -26%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
125 MB/s -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=95, last 2 years)
97.6 MB/s -47%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
83.5 MB/s -55%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
261.31 MB/s +36%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
207.6 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
191.89 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=92, last 2 years)
121.8 MB/s -37%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
86.2 MB/s -55%

沟通

可更换的英特尔AX210
可更换的英特尔AX210

不幸的是,制造商取消了局域网端口,也没有包括一个适配器。

无线连接是由英特尔AX210 WiFi 6E模块负责的。该模块在2.4GHz、5GHz和6GHz下传输。

传输速率是快速和稳定的。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1645 (1614min - 1670max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1494 (1283min - 1580max) MBit/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=79, last 2 years)
1494 MBit/s -9%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (700 - 1857, n=183)
1486 MBit/s -10%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1890 (1843min - 1936max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1619 (1537min - 1665max) MBit/s
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1545 (1508min, 1510.9P1 - 1569max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=204)
1389 MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1379 MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1328 (1093min - 1448max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1615 (840min - 1682max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1596 (1559min - 1632max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (648 - 1878, n=79, last 2 years)
1468 MBit/s -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1371 (1036min - 1505max) MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (632 - 1851, n=184)
1369 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1582 (1517min, 1518.74P1 - 1636max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1579 (848min - 1696max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1466 (748min - 1542max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1347 (1002min - 1458max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=156, last 2 years)
1249 MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=204)
1245 MBit/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1155 (495min - 1441max) MBit/s
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1587 (840-1682)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1371 (1036-1505)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1644 (1614-1670)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1283-1580)

网络摄像头

在这一领域,制造商终于升级到全高清摄像头,该机型甚至有一个红外传感器,用于使用Windows Hello登录Windows。然而,图像有明显的黄色色调,颜色偏差相对较高。

ColorChecker
25.8 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
29.7 ∆E
23.5 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
30.9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
25.1 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
22.5 ∆E
24 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X: 20.82 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 30.87 ∆E

安全问题

TPM和Kensington连接器都在板上,但缺少指纹传感器,不幸的是,还缺少一个物理网络摄像头快门。

辅料

包、鼠标和耳机
包、鼠标和耳机

我们的评测模型装在一个巨大的包装里,让我们想起了一个发电站。相比之下,包括相当多的配件。例如,一个带有笔记本电脑隔间的手提包,一个鼠标(ROG Gladius III)以及耳机(ROG Fusion II 300),都印有ROG品牌。

根据华硕的说法,这些配件与我们的配置模型一起,但M16也可以作为独立的设备购买。

维护

在设备的底部,有15个十字头螺钉等待拆卸。不幸的是,其中7个(!)位于胶合的橡胶塞下面,拆卸起来很麻烦,很烦人,而且是不必要的用户不友好。

隐藏在黑色橡胶塞下的5个螺钉...
隐藏在黑色橡胶塞下的5个螺钉...
...也是用胶水粘起来的
...也是用胶水粘起来的
另有2颗螺丝藏在橡胶挡板下面。
另有2颗螺丝藏在橡胶挡板下面。
4种不同类型的螺丝/长度的螺丝
4种不同类型的螺丝/长度的螺丝

总而言之,我们发现了4种不同长度/类型的螺丝!因此值得注意的是,哪些是属于哪里的!因此,值得注意的是,哪些是属于哪里的。连同7个隐藏的螺丝和SO-DIMM内存,M16可以说是难以升级或维修的。

至少底板可以很容易地被撬开。在内部,可以接触到三个风扇、电池、SSD、第二个M.2 SSD插槽、可更换的WiFi模块以及SO-DIMM内存插槽。

冷却系统包括2个正常大小的风扇和一个额外的小风扇,估计是位于图形单元的顶部。固态硬盘拥有一个冷却垫,在我们的评测模型中看起来相当粗糙。

已开放
已开放
底板的热管上有一个铜条
底板的热管上有一个铜条
两个SO-DIMM内存条
两个SO-DIMM内存条
第二个M.2 SSD插槽
第二个M.2 SSD插槽

担保

Gigabyte的笔记本电脑有24个月的保证。

输入设备 - 有点浅的按键和一个大的触摸板

键盘

布局看起来非常宽敞。在左上方,华硕为音量控制、麦克风和华硕的控制中心加入了四个额外的特殊按键。这些也可以手动配置。

不幸的是,方向键非常狭窄,而且电源键,典型的这类键盘,是一个单独的键。尽管是一个16英寸的设备,但没有数字键盘。

键拥有非常短的行程,反馈有点浅,但仍然足够精确。总的来说,虽然打字的体验相当好,但我们更希望按键更清晰一些。打字的噪音是中等的。

3级背光以不同的RGB颜色照亮,但只有单区。

键盘
键盘
电源按钮
电源按钮
4个额外的特殊钥匙
4个额外的特殊钥匙
狭窄的方向键
狭窄的方向键

触摸板

大型触摸板
大型触摸板

大型触摸板(约13 x 8.5厘米)略微偏向右侧,即使执行较长的动作,也能提供流畅的刷卡体验。

集成的按键有一个短而好的压力点,反馈清晰。咔哒声可以说是安静到适度。

显示屏 - 非常明亮的Mini-LED,带HDR功能

制造商再次选择了一个哑光、16:10的IPS显示屏,分辨率为2560 x 1600像素。然而,这不是同一块面板,因为它带有一个新的版本号,现在是由Mini-LED技术背光。华硕没有透露该面板采用的调光区数量。

这里是设置显示器背光的地方
这里是设置显示器背光的地方
略有颗粒感的哑光IPS子像素
略有颗粒感的哑光IPS子像素
单区模式下的边缘屏幕出血
单区模式下的边缘屏幕出血

在处理Mini-LED时,有几件事必须考虑:只有在使用华硕自己的控制中心,即Armory Crate软件将背光设置为多区时,才能实现最大亮度。在HDR模式下,这是自动设置的,如果HDR被停用(SDR模式是经过校准的,颜色偏差较小),面板会自动照亮个别区域。使用这种设置,亮度约低100尼特。

在下文中,我们强调激活多区的SDR模式值。然而,这种模式对于图像处理并不理想。

黑色水平也令人惊讶。使用单区背光时,这只有0.55,但对比度很差。只有在使用多区设置时,这才下降到一个优秀的0.03。这也是我们在激活多区的情况下进行测量的原因之一。

我们测量的亮度约为627尼特(多区,否则约为519尼特)。在92%的情况下,照明效果非常好,亮度在显示屏的右侧逐渐减弱。与前代产品相比,该面板的刷新率已从165赫兹提高到240赫兹。

644
cd/m²
649
cd/m²
607
cd/m²
641
cd/m²
634
cd/m²
595
cd/m²
629
cd/m²
643
cd/m²
604
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0B74 (NE160QDM-NM4 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 649 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 627.3 cd/m² Minimum: 66.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 634 cd/m²
Contrast: 21133:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.98, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.13 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
90.01% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.33% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
BOE0B74 (NE160QDM-NM4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-5%
-3%
-0%
-17%
-0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.33
92.8
-7%
97.2
-2%
94.9
-4%
69.1
-30%
98.5
-1%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
98.5
-1%
99.9
0%
99.9
0%
99.7
0%
100
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
90.01
83.1
-8%
84.9
-6%
92.4
3%
71.2
-21%
89.7
0%
Response Times
76%
80%
-15%
78%
73%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
50.8 ?(27.6, 23.2)
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
85%
5.41 ?(2.57, 2.84)
89%
38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n)
24%
12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6)
76%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
87%
Response Time Black / White *
29.6 ?(25, 4.6)
10 ?(4.6, 5.4)
66%
8.62 ?(3.68, 4.94, n)
71%
26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n)
10%
5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7)
80%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
59%
PWM Frequency
12000
2380 ?(100)
-80%
Screen
-181%
-399%
3033%
-150%
-212%
Brightness middle
634
497
-22%
490
-23%
606
-4%
511
-19%
456.8
-28%
Brightness
627
481
-23%
468
-25%
602
-4%
469
-25%
437
-30%
Brightness Distribution
92
82
-11%
86
-7%
93
1%
86
-7%
83
-10%
Black Level *
0.03
0.21
-600%
0.54
-1700%
0.0001
100%
0.4
-1233%
0.35
-1067%
Contrast
21133
2367
-89%
907
-96%
6060000
28576%
1278
-94%
1305
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.89
3.53
-297%
4.97
-458%
4.8
-439%
0.95
-7%
3.7
-316%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.79
6.15
-244%
11.02
-516%
8.2
-358%
2.07
-16%
6.42
-259%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.91
3.53
-288%
2.97
-226%
1.8
-98%
0.91
-0%
0.66
27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.13
1.74
-54%
7.2
-537%
6.5
-475%
0.6
47%
2.6
-130%
Gamma
2.47 89%
2.2 100%
2.161 102%
2.63 84%
2.176 101%
2.3 96%
CCT
6497 100%
6418 101%
6515 100%
6596 99%
6545 99%
6108 106%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-37% / -107%
-107% / -245%
1006% / 1817%
-30% / -89%
-46% / -126%

* ... smaller is better

华硕宣传该设备具有100%的DCI P3,这一点我们的分析能够证实。AdobeRGB的再现率为90%。

sRGB
sRGB
DCI P3
DCI P3
AdobeRGB
AdobeRGB

开箱后,该面板被很好地校准(SDR),其DeltaE灰度和ColorChecker值仅为1.13和0.89。一个新的校准几乎无法改善问题。灰度DeltaE略有下降,而ColorChecker的偏差略有增加。

然而,在HDR模式下,校准已经消失了(见下面屏幕截图的最后一行)。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校准
饱和度校准
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker
灰度HDR
灰度HDR
饱和度HDR
饱和度HDR
色彩检测器HDR
色彩检测器HDR

在我们的评测模型中,确定响应时间并不容易,因为至少12kHz的PWM频率(见下文)与响应时间曲线相重叠。华硕将其规定为3毫秒,但没有透露他们使用的测量技术。在全亮度下,我们测量的结果是30至50毫秒,一方面,这很高,但也可能受到重叠的PWM频率的影响。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 4.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 27.6 ms rise
↘ 23.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 12000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 12000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 12000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17585 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM是用来调节亮度的。在亮度为100%至83%时,频率为12千赫,这对通常对PWM敏感的人来说甚至不应该被注意到。低于这个数值时,频率继续上升,在69至100千赫兹之间。

0%的亮度
0%的亮度
25%的亮度
25%的亮度
50%的亮度
50%的亮度
75%的亮度
75%的亮度
100%的亮度
100%的亮度

在户外,哑光表面确保了相对较高的亮度以及非常好的可读性,至少在阴凉处是如此。从上面看显示屏时应注意,因为图像很快就会被冲淡。

明亮的显示屏
明亮的显示屏
应避免侧面观察的角度
应避免侧面观察的角度
非常好的可视角度稳定性
非常好的可视角度稳定性

性能 - 涡轮机缺少一个火花

从纸面上看,新的M16应该是16英寸机身中的一个重量级性能:猛禽湖 酷睿i9-13900H, Nvidia Geforce RTX 4090和64GB内存,向所有可能的性能王位竞争者抛出了挑战。

测试条件

华硕的游戏玩家控制中心是软件Amoury Crate。除了各种性能模式外,这里是所有重要设置的地方,也是诸如AniMe Matrix和风扇曲线可以定制的地方。

在我们的基准测试中,我们在应用程序中选择了涡轮模式,以获得尽可能好的结果。由于前一代产品的高噪音排放,其前身使用性能模式进行测试,是更类似于平衡模式的东西。

军械库木箱概述
军械库木箱概述
简介设置
简介设置

处理器

到现在为止,酷睿i9-13900H是唯一的CPU选项,也是英特尔新猛禽湖系列中最强大的处理器之一。它提供了6个P核和8个E核,前者的涡轮增压频率高达5.4GHz。E核的基本时钟速度为1.9GHz。

涡轮增压模式下的CPU TDP
涡轮增压模式下的CPU TDP
性能模式下的CPU TDP
性能模式下的CPU TDP
安静模式下的CPU TDP
安静模式下的CPU TDP
电池模式下的CPU TDP
电池模式下的CPU TDP

在我们的Cinebench循环中,M16超过了整个配置上一代CPU的竞争对手。然而,即使与功能明显不足的i7-12700H相比,差距也相对较小。 i7-12700H中发现的惠普Omen 16.与前代产品相比,其领先优势同样很小,性能模式下的得分可能几乎相同。

看一下TDP,第一个Turbo模式的运行峰值为140瓦,其他的运行都在100瓦左右。

性能模式下,最初的140瓦峰值下降到大约120瓦,但在这里,TDP通常也是在大约100瓦的位置。

安静模式下,峰值消失了,TDP在60瓦和最大100瓦之间。

在电池模式下,相同模式(静音)下的性能甚至更低,短暂的最大功率为34瓦,在较长的持续负载时间内只达到20瓦多一点的功率。

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous

0245490735980122514701715196022052450269529403185343036753920416544104655Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2914 (2871.5-3068.66)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ARH7H RTX 3070 Ti AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø2351 (2324.37-2366.02)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2244 (2201.79-2586.32)
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2282 (2251.36-2406.88)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4366 (4298.3-4875.08)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
85.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
68.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
66.7 pt
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
65.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
63.9 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
61.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
61.4 pt
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
61.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
54 pt
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
53.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28707 (26191.7min - 28706.8max) Points +47%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
28010 (26406.1min - 28009.8max) Points +44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26703 Points +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=210, last 2 years)
20773 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
19469 (17696.3min - 19468.6max) Points
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
19250 Points -1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
18444 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (13015 - 20385, n=27)
16992 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
15987 Points -18%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
15906 (14978min - 15906.4max) Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
15870 Points -18%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11814 Points -39%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2055 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
1974 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
1921 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1910 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1297 - 2054, n=25)
1894 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1871 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=208, last 2 years)
1846 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1819 Points -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1765 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
1698 Points -14%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
11289 Points +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=208, last 2 years)
7900 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
7411 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
7382 Points 0%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
6950 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (4960 - 7716, n=24)
6599 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
6124 Points -17%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
6108 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6053 Points -18%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
4847 Points -35%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
756 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
751 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
738 Points -2%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
733 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (428 - 792, n=24)
723 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
715 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 855, n=208, last 2 years)
710 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
692 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
653 Points -13%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4913 Points +60%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4875 (4298.3min - 4875.08max) Points +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=212, last 2 years)
3265 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
3069 (2871.5min - 3068.66max) Points
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
2903 (2783min - 2902.76max) Points -5%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
2894 (2672.55min - 2894.15max) Points -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2061 - 3100, n=25)
2685 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2201.79min - 2586.32max) Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2431.02min - 2585.82max) Points -16%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2580 (2349.9min - 2579.98max) Points -16%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2518 (1886.88min - 2518.1max) Points -18%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
2407 (2251.36min - 2406.88max) Points -22%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
295 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
294 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
292 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
275 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (198 - 318, n=211, last 2 years)
272 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
271 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (211 - 297, n=25)
270 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
263 Points -10%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points -12%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
250 Points -14%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
243 Points -17%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
246 Seconds * -48%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
214 Seconds * -29%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (166 - 268, n=23)
203 Seconds * -22%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
201 Seconds * -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
195 Seconds * -17%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
190.3 Seconds * -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=202, last 2 years)
181 Seconds * -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
171 Seconds * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
166 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
111 Seconds * +33%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
118715 MIPS +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=206, last 2 years)
81525 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
79032 MIPS
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
72610 MIPS -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
70903 MIPS -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (45045 - 79032, n=24)
66867 MIPS -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
66057 MIPS -16%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
64899 MIPS -18%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
63738 MIPS -19%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
55958 MIPS -29%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6800 MIPS +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
6245 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (4502 - 7581, n=206, last 2 years)
6221 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6192 MIPS -1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
6120 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3665 - 6600, n=24)
6064 MIPS -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
5835 MIPS -7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5818 MIPS -7%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
5590 MIPS -10%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
5302 MIPS -15%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
20784 Points +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
15410 Points
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
14376 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=209, last 2 years)
14344 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
12981 Points -16%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
12963 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
12753 Points -17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (9094 - 15410, n=25)
12693 Points -18%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
12035 Points -22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11626 Points -25%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2023 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
1974 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (1140 - 2043, n=25)
1903 Points -4%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
1886 Points -4%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
1854 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1196 - 2210, n=209, last 2 years)
1847 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1841 Points -7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1749 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
1746 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
1647 Points -17%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
30.9 fps +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=206, last 2 years)
22.4 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
21.7 fps
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
21.4 fps -1%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps -13%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.7 fps -14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (14.1 - 22.3, n=24)
18.7 fps -14%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.3 fps -20%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.6 fps -33%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
59.8 s * -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
50.5 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 96.6, n=203, last 2 years)
48.3 s * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (34.4 - 82.8, n=24)
47.6 s * +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
46 s * +9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
43.5 s * +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
42.2 s * +16%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.1 s * +17%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
41.2 s * +18%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
39 s * +23%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.5 sec * -21%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4659 sec * -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4495 sec * -9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (0.4052 - 0.723, n=24)
0.4484 sec * -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.658, n=206, last 2 years)
0.4462 sec * -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4352 sec * -6%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.432 sec * -5%
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4292 sec * -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.412 sec *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.3866 sec * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3069 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
221 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
292 Points
Help
Performance Rating
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
97.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
93.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
91.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
69 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
 
58.9 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
28957 KRay/s +53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
28701 KRay/s +51%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
26741 KRay/s +41%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
25857 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=203, last 2 years)
20488 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
18961 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 KRay/s -19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6788 - 19557, n=24)
15275 KRay/s -19%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
144303 Points +54%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
138190 Points +47%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133668 Points +43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125944 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=203, last 2 years)
102074 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
93802 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (22551 - 95579, n=24)
76922 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74919 Points -20%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
7093 MB/s +69%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
6949 MB/s +65%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6750 MB/s +60%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6350 MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=203, last 2 years)
4659 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
4207 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (2491 - 4270, n=24)
3593 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3545 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
141427 Points +18%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
139649 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
134227 Points +12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133226 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
120181 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (41257 - 200651, n=203, last 2 years)
113842 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (65121 - 120936, n=24)
105721 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105420 Points -12%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17117 Points +47%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
17057 Points +47%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15813 Points +36%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15807 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (3925 - 32988, n=203, last 2 years)
12754 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
11631 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (6108 - 11631, n=24)
9737 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9538 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
71038 Points +53%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
70739 Points +52%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
66753 Points +44%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
63308 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=203, last 2 years)
51765 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
46487 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (11283 - 48474, n=24)
38058 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36496 Points -21%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
136551 MB/s +61%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
134166 MB/s +58%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
128492 MB/s +51%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
127698 MB/s +50%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125644 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=203, last 2 years)
111143 MB/s +31%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3691 - 149377, n=24)
86467 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
85007 MB/s
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2059 MB/s +71%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
2030 MB/s +69%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1936 MB/s +61%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1850 MB/s +54%
Average of class Gaming
  (269 - 2409, n=203, last 2 years)
1285 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
1204 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (789 - 1254, n=24)
1049 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
993 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15573 KRay/s +51%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
15540 KRay/s +50%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
14722 KRay/s +42%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
13844 KRay/s +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=203, last 2 years)
11059 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
10342 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8316 KRay/s -20%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (3655 - 10716, n=24)
8297 KRay/s -20%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50834 MPixel/s +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
48626 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
48325 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
44016 MPixel/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s -12%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
40896 MPixel/s -15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (10871 - 50488, n=24)
40197 MPixel/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=204, last 2 years)
38468 MPixel/s -20%

系统性能

我们的M16在PCMark10中没有表现出任何大的弱点,但也不能完全指责它超过了上一代的竞争对手。它的Legion 7实际上要快几个百分点。在数字内容创作测试中,分数有些令人失望,特别是在编辑和渲染领域。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
8636 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8277 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8186 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (7985 - 8277, n=2)
8131 Points -2%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8083 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (5442 - 9852, n=184, last 2 years)
7669 Points -7%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7539 Points -9%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7496 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points -23%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11659 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (11500 - 11659, n=2)
11580 Points -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
11205 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11190 Points -4%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11178 Points -4%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11019 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (8829 - 12334, n=183, last 2 years)
10773 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10715 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points -20%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11186 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11046 Points
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10932 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (10526 - 11046, n=2)
10786 Points -2%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10385 Points -6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
10144 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=183, last 2 years)
9799 Points -11%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
9613 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points -30%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
14291 Points +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13098 Points +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11949 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=183, last 2 years)
11706 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  (11412 - 11949, n=2)
11681 Points -2%
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11626 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11293 Points -5%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9847 Points -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points -19%
CrossMark / Overall
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2132 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1993 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1972 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1972 Points 0%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1965 Points 0%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1903 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=163, last 2 years)
1883 Points -5%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1861 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
1664 Points -16%
CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2012 Points +9%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1870 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1845 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1845 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1820 Points -1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1808 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=163, last 2 years)
1790 Points -3%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1786 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
1591 Points -14%
CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
2384 Points +7%
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2307 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2233 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
2233 Points 0%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2135 Points -4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2095 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=163, last 2 years)
2057 Points -8%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1936 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
1797 Points -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points -23%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2007 Points +21%
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1868 Points +13%
Alienware x15 R2 P111F
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1777 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=163, last 2 years)
1693 Points +2%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1666 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1658 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
  ()
1658 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
1528 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H
1514 Points -9%
PCMark 10 Score
8277 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77544 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77060 MB/s +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
70473 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67561 MB/s -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
63863 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (37448 - 74486, n=24)
62498 MB/s -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=203, last 2 years)
62043 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
85073 MB/s +21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84869 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
74518 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
70351 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67051 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 90647, n=203, last 2 years)
66002 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (41599 - 75433, n=24)
63123 MB/s -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
62807 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80441 MB/s +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
71007 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
70939 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
67449 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66275 MB/s -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (36152 - 88505, n=24)
65854 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 103259, n=203, last 2 years)
63951 MB/s -10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
60389 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 ns * -13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
92.8 ns * -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=202, last 2 years)
91 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H
  (75.8 - 102.3, n=24)
89.6 ns * -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
89.3 ns * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88 ns * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
88 ns *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
83.2 ns * +5%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

当面临打开多个浏览器标签的挑战时,M16并没有出汗。一切看起来都很好,直到在播放我们的4k/60帧的YouTube视频和随后的Prime95中出现了大的延迟。到那时为止,实际上已经是很好的数值,但却暴涨了好几倍。

这样一来,M16的延迟明显高于上一代的竞争对手。新一代的驱动程序似乎还不够成熟,这一点从微星泰坦的类似的高延迟值中可以看出。微星泰坦.

YouTube测试
YouTube测试
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4710.9 μs * -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4080.9 μs *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2448.6 μs * +40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
1095 μs * +73%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs * +77%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
437.7 μs * +89%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

冷却垫略有磨损--但冷却效果良好
冷却垫略有磨损--但冷却效果良好

我们的配置有一个NVMe SSD三星PM9A1,有四个PCIe 4通道,容量为2TB,在我们的最佳SSD列表中排名第11位。 最佳固态硬盘列表中排名第11位.

M16的固态硬盘性能比这种类型的固态硬盘所能预期的要低20%左右。然而,在实际使用中,这在很大程度上不会被注意到,从积极的一面来看,性能在较长时间内是稳定的。

水晶石标记
水晶石标记
AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD复制
AS SSD复制
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7092 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5205 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 471 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 449 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 74.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 151.3 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 466 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1017 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
82.9 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
 
72.8 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
71.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
68.4 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
64.3 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
61.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
61 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
54.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5598 (5462.22min - 5597.85max) MB/s +43%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4842 (4719.64min - 4842.11max) MB/s +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4525 (4498.41min - 4525.41max) MB/s +16%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2376 - 5676, n=29)
3919 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3917 (3883.93min - 3916.78max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3844 (3257.93min - 3843.87max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3764 (3540.2min - 3763.76max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=185, last 2 years)
3515 MB/s -10%
seq write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7533 (7482.85min - 7532.79max) MB/s +124%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4767 (4365.51min - 4766.62max) MB/s +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4378 (4355.78min - 4378.43max) MB/s +30%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (2461 - 7628, n=29)
4204 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
4199 (3998.61min - 4199.12max) MB/s +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=185, last 2 years)
3789 MB/s +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3365 (3321.68min - 3365.3max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3242 (1498min - 3241.78max) MB/s -4%
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11242 (10740.3min - 11242.2max) MB/s +61%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
10774 (9137.92min - 10774max) MB/s +54%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3471 - 12556, n=29)
7139 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6988 (5851.89min - 6987.92max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6872 (4963.33min - 6872.25max) MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6682 (5778.28min - 6681.95max) MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6550 (5497.59min - 6549.73max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=185, last 2 years)
6344 MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9942 (9912.92min - 9941.76max) MB/s +93%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
8404 (8165.05min - 8403.71max) MB/s +63%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (3537 - 10261, n=29)
5515 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5151 (5119.78min - 5150.82max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4923.06min - 4943.2max) MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4876 (4374.87min - 4876.3max) MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=185, last 2 years)
4798 MB/s -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4244 (427.59min - 4244.22max) MB/s -18%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
95.3 (93.25min - 95.25max) MB/s +29%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83.1 (79.37min - 83.07max) MB/s +12%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
  (56.2 - 91.2, n=29)
78.5 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.3 (71.59min - 74.33max) MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
74.1 (72.59min - 74.06max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=185, last 2 years)
66.8 MB/s -10%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W
2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0)
57.5 (57.09min - 57.53max) MB/s -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
56.5 (49.8min - 56.49max) MB/s -24%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 (263.57min - 264.44max) MB/s +70%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
255 (243.79min - 255.25max) MB/s +64%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 397, n=185, last 2 years)
221 MB/s +42%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024