华硕ROG Zephyrus M16(2023)笔记本电脑评测:RTX 4090与超亮的Mini-LED显示屏
作为 "老 "一代CPU/GPU的最后一个例子,我们最近审查了 ROG Zephyrus M16它配备了一个酷睿i9-12900H和一个RTX 3070 Ti.但现在,M16的外形已经发生了变化,这次配备的是酷睿i9-13900H和一个RTX 4090装在一个 "AniMe Matrix "机箱内。后者略有变化,因为矩阵变得更加精细。我们已经详细了解了这些变化,并调查了M16是否能与RTX 4090相处。
不言而喻,我们将新设备与前代产品以及其他高端游戏机进行了比较。由于RTX 4090通常出现在较大的笔记本电脑中,我们还看了18英寸的华硕ROG Strix Scar 18或17英寸的MSI Titan GT77.我们还考虑了这两款 联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX和 Razer Blade 16都是竞争对手。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % | 03/2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 22.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.8 % | 02/2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.6 % | 02/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89 % | 02/2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
89.4 % | 02/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 26 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.2 % | 02/2023 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 21.99 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例--AniMe Matrix是一个令人震惊的案例
技嘉今年修改了机箱,但乍一看,很难发现任何明显的差异。机箱继续由黑色塑料制成,现在稍微厚一些。
顶面的所谓AniMe矩阵比以前更精细、更详细,可以显示简单、移动的标识或带有附加效果的文字。一方面,这很酷,但它不仅可能增加设备的功耗,而且当笔记本电脑打开时,用户基本上看不到它。出于这个原因,这种效果更多是为了给旁观者留下深刻印象。
我们对盖子后部顶部的空白黑色塑料条没有印象。它看起来有些廉价,不是很稳定,而且已经开始出现磨损的迹象。总而言之,几乎所有侧面的通风格栅都有轻微改变,端口位置也是如此。
底座似乎很坚固,但在试图扭转箱子时,吱吱嘎嘎的声音相当大。同样,显示屏的盖子也是如此,它很容易被弯曲。铰链将显示器固定得相当牢固,并确保盖子可以打开到180度的角度。打开笔记本时,有两件事向用户展示了自己--键盘略微抬起,显示屏边框相当纤细。
不寻常的是,与前代产品相比,该设备的占地面积有所增加。 前代产品.与使设备更小、更薄、更轻的趋势相反,新的M16略大,而且比上一代机型厚3毫米。
这款Razer Blade 16只薄了1毫米,而联想Legion Pro 7略厚,这意味着新的M16处于中间位置,在重量方面也是如此。
特点 - 一个没有LAN端口的游戏机
在这个领域,也不是一切都变好了:局域网端口被简单地省略了,这意味着对于那些寻求最短延迟和最快连接的游戏玩家来说,只有通过适配器才能实现快速的互联网连接。
其中一个USB-C端口已经从左侧游走到右侧。这意味着设备的左侧有更多的空间。在后面,你仍然只能找到风扇格栅,这导致缺乏空间容纳更多的连接器,如HDMI或缺少的LAN端口。
SD卡阅读器
至少这台笔记本电脑配备了一个内置的SD卡读卡器,虽然不幸的是这只用于microSD卡,但它仍然非常快。我们能够使用AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60参考卡在6秒内将一个1GB的图像复制到桌面上。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (26 - 269, n=93, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) |
沟通
不幸的是,制造商取消了局域网端口,也没有包括一个适配器。
无线连接是由英特尔AX210 WiFi 6E模块负责的。该模块在2.4GHz、5GHz和6GHz下传输。
传输速率是快速和稳定的。
网络摄像头
在这一领域,制造商终于升级到全高清摄像头,该机型甚至有一个红外传感器,用于使用Windows Hello登录Windows。然而,图像有明显的黄色色调,颜色偏差相对较高。
安全问题
TPM和Kensington连接器都在板上,但缺少指纹传感器,不幸的是,还缺少一个物理网络摄像头快门。
辅料
我们的评测模型装在一个巨大的包装里,让我们想起了一个发电站。相比之下,包括相当多的配件。例如,一个带有笔记本电脑隔间的手提包,一个鼠标(ROG Gladius III)以及耳机(ROG Fusion II 300),都印有ROG品牌。
根据华硕的说法,这些配件与我们的配置模型一起,但M16也可以作为独立的设备购买。
维护
在设备的底部,有15个十字头螺钉等待拆卸。不幸的是,其中7个(!)位于胶合的橡胶塞下面,拆卸起来很麻烦,很烦人,而且是不必要的用户不友好。
总而言之,我们发现了4种不同长度/类型的螺丝!因此值得注意的是,哪些是属于哪里的!因此,值得注意的是,哪些是属于哪里的。连同7个隐藏的螺丝和SO-DIMM内存,M16可以说是难以升级或维修的。
至少底板可以很容易地被撬开。在内部,可以接触到三个风扇、电池、SSD、第二个M.2 SSD插槽、可更换的WiFi模块以及SO-DIMM内存插槽。
冷却系统包括2个正常大小的风扇和一个额外的小风扇,估计是位于图形单元的顶部。固态硬盘拥有一个冷却垫,在我们的评测模型中看起来相当粗糙。
担保
Gigabyte的笔记本电脑有24个月的保证。
输入设备 - 有点浅的按键和一个大的触摸板
键盘
布局看起来非常宽敞。在左上方,华硕为音量控制、麦克风和华硕的控制中心加入了四个额外的特殊按键。这些也可以手动配置。
不幸的是,方向键非常狭窄,而且电源键,典型的这类键盘,是一个单独的键。尽管是一个16英寸的设备,但没有数字键盘。
键拥有非常短的行程,反馈有点浅,但仍然足够精确。总的来说,虽然打字的体验相当好,但我们更希望按键更清晰一些。打字的噪音是中等的。
3级背光以不同的RGB颜色照亮,但只有单区。
触摸板
大型触摸板(约13 x 8.5厘米)略微偏向右侧,即使执行较长的动作,也能提供流畅的刷卡体验。
集成的按键有一个短而好的压力点,反馈清晰。咔哒声可以说是安静到适度。
显示屏 - 非常明亮的Mini-LED,带HDR功能
制造商再次选择了一个哑光、16:10的IPS显示屏,分辨率为2560 x 1600像素。然而,这不是同一块面板,因为它带有一个新的版本号,现在是由Mini-LED技术背光。华硕没有透露该面板采用的调光区数量。
在处理Mini-LED时,有几件事必须考虑:只有在使用华硕自己的控制中心,即Armory Crate软件将背光设置为多区时,才能实现最大亮度。在HDR模式下,这是自动设置的,如果HDR被停用(SDR模式是经过校准的,颜色偏差较小),面板会自动照亮个别区域。使用这种设置,亮度约低100尼特。
在下文中,我们强调激活多区的SDR模式值。然而,这种模式对于图像处理并不理想。
黑色水平也令人惊讶。使用单区背光时,这只有0.55,但对比度很差。只有在使用多区设置时,这才下降到一个优秀的0.03。这也是我们在激活多区的情况下进行测量的原因之一。
我们测量的亮度约为627尼特(多区,否则约为519尼特)。在92%的情况下,照明效果非常好,亮度在显示屏的右侧逐渐减弱。与前代产品相比,该面板的刷新率已从165赫兹提高到240赫兹。
|
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 634 cd/m²
Contrast: 21133:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 0.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.13 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
90.01% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.33% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X BOE0B74 (NE160QDM-NM4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -3% | -0% | -17% | -0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.33 | 92.8 -7% | 97.2 -2% | 94.9 -4% | 69.1 -30% | 98.5 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 98.5 -1% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 90.01 | 83.1 -8% | 84.9 -6% | 92.4 3% | 71.2 -21% | 89.7 0% |
Response Times | 76% | 80% | -15% | 78% | 73% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 50.8 ? | 7.6 ? 85% | 5.41 ? 89% | 38.4 ? 24% | 12.3 ? 76% | 6.6 ? 87% |
Response Time Black / White * | 29.6 ? | 10 ? 66% | 8.62 ? 71% | 26.6 ? 10% | 5.9 ? 80% | 12 ? 59% |
PWM Frequency | 12000 | 2380 ? -80% | ||||
Screen | -181% | -399% | 3033% | -150% | -212% | |
Brightness middle | 634 | 497 -22% | 490 -23% | 606 -4% | 511 -19% | 456.8 -28% |
Brightness | 627 | 481 -23% | 468 -25% | 602 -4% | 469 -25% | 437 -30% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 82 -11% | 86 -7% | 93 1% | 86 -7% | 83 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.21 -600% | 0.54 -1700% | 0.0001 100% | 0.4 -1233% | 0.35 -1067% |
Contrast | 21133 | 2367 -89% | 907 -96% | 6060000 28576% | 1278 -94% | 1305 -94% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 0.89 | 3.53 -297% | 4.97 -458% | 4.8 -439% | 0.95 -7% | 3.7 -316% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 1.79 | 6.15 -244% | 11.02 -516% | 8.2 -358% | 2.07 -16% | 6.42 -259% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.91 | 3.53 -288% | 2.97 -226% | 1.8 -98% | 0.91 -0% | 0.66 27% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.13 | 1.74 -54% | 7.2 -537% | 6.5 -475% | 0.6 47% | 2.6 -130% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.2 100% | 2.161 102% | 2.63 84% | 2.176 101% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6497 100% | 6418 101% | 6515 100% | 6596 99% | 6545 99% | 6108 106% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -37% /
-107% | -107% /
-245% | 1006% /
1817% | -30% /
-89% | -46% /
-126% |
* ... smaller is better
华硕宣传该设备具有100%的DCI P3,这一点我们的分析能够证实。AdobeRGB的再现率为90%。
开箱后,该面板被很好地校准(SDR),其DeltaE灰度和ColorChecker值仅为1.13和0.89。一个新的校准几乎无法改善问题。灰度DeltaE略有下降,而ColorChecker的偏差略有增加。
然而,在HDR模式下,校准已经消失了(见下面屏幕截图的最后一行)。
在我们的评测模型中,确定响应时间并不容易,因为至少12kHz的PWM频率(见下文)与响应时间曲线相重叠。华硕将其规定为3毫秒,但没有透露他们使用的测量技术。在全亮度下,我们测量的结果是30至50毫秒,一方面,这很高,但也可能受到重叠的PWM频率的影响。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
29.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise | |
↘ 4.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
50.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise | |
↘ 23.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 12000 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 12000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 12000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17933 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
PWM是用来调节亮度的。在亮度为100%至83%时,频率为12千赫,这对通常对PWM敏感的人来说甚至不应该被注意到。低于这个数值时,频率继续上升,在69至100千赫兹之间。
在户外,哑光表面确保了相对较高的亮度以及非常好的可读性,至少在阴凉处是如此。从上面看显示屏时应注意,因为图像很快就会被冲淡。
性能 - 涡轮机缺少一个火花
从纸面上看,新的M16应该是16英寸机身中的一个重量级性能:猛禽湖 酷睿i9-13900H, Nvidia Geforce RTX 4090和64GB内存,向所有可能的性能王位竞争者抛出了挑战。
测试条件
华硕的游戏玩家控制中心是软件Amoury Crate。除了各种性能模式外,这里是所有重要设置的地方,也是诸如AniMe Matrix和风扇曲线可以定制的地方。
在我们的基准测试中,我们在应用程序中选择了涡轮模式,以获得尽可能好的结果。由于前一代产品的高噪音排放,其前身使用性能模式进行测试,是更类似于平衡模式的东西。
处理器
到现在为止,酷睿i9-13900H是唯一的CPU选项,也是英特尔新猛禽湖系列中最强大的处理器之一。它提供了6个P核和8个E核,前者的涡轮增压频率高达5.4GHz。E核的基本时钟速度为1.9GHz。
在我们的Cinebench循环中,M16超过了整个配置上一代CPU的竞争对手。然而,即使与功能明显不足的i7-12700H相比,差距也相对较小。 i7-12700H中发现的惠普Omen 16.与前代产品相比,其领先优势同样很小,性能模式下的得分可能几乎相同。
看一下TDP,第一个Turbo模式的运行峰值为140瓦,其他的运行都在100瓦左右。
在性能模式下,最初的140瓦峰值下降到大约120瓦,但在这里,TDP通常也是在大约100瓦的位置。
在安静模式下,峰值消失了,TDP在60瓦和最大100瓦之间。
在电池模式下,相同模式(静音)下的性能甚至更低,短暂的最大功率为34瓦,在较长的持续负载时间内只达到20瓦多一点的功率。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (13177 - 20385, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=23) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4960 - 7716, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=23) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=21) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years) | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=22) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=22) | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years) | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.7 - 22.3, n=22) | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=22) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16 G7 i7 RTX 3070Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Acer Predator Triton 300 SE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=22) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years) |
系统性能
我们的M16在PCMark10中没有表现出任何大的弱点,但也不能完全指责它超过了上一代的竞争对手。它的Legion 7实际上要快几个百分点。在数字内容创作测试中,分数有些令人失望,特别是在编辑和渲染领域。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7985 - 8277, n=2) | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Average of class Gaming (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (11500 - 11659, n=2) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX | |
Average of class Gaming (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10526 - 11046, n=2) | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (11412 - 11949, n=2) | |
MSI Creator Z16P B12UHST | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 |
PCMark 10 Score | 8277 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (82.3 - 102.3, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
当面临打开多个浏览器标签的挑战时,M16并没有出汗。一切看起来都很好,直到在播放我们的4k/60帧的YouTube视频和随后的Prime95中出现了大的延迟。到那时为止,实际上已经是很好的数值,但却暴涨了好几倍。
这样一来,M16的延迟明显高于上一代的竞争对手。新一代的驱动程序似乎还不够成熟,这一点从微星泰坦的类似的高延迟值中可以看出。微星泰坦.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
我们的配置有一个NVMe SSD三星PM9A1,有四个PCIe 4通道,容量为2TB,在我们的最佳SSD列表中排名第11位。 最佳固态硬盘列表中排名第11位.
M16的固态硬盘性能比这种类型的固态硬盘所能预期的要低20%左右。然而,在实际使用中,这在很大程度上不会被注意到,从积极的一面来看,性能在较长时间内是稳定的。
* ... smaller is better
Continuous performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
有了新的M16,你可以在以下方面进行选择 RTX 4070, RTX 4080和 RTX 4090.在我们的配置中,顶级型号是目前最快的笔记本电脑GPU,其功耗在80至150瓦之间,外加15瓦的动态提升。M16的最大功耗为150瓦,其中包括25瓦的动态提升。
在3DMark基准测试中,偶尔会出现通过Optimus或MSHybrid/Standard将显示设备切换到dGPU的问题,有时会导致测试由iGPU启动。同样在这个领域,似乎驱动程序还没有完全成熟。如果有疑问,dGPU应该被手动激活(MUX)。
到目前为止,我们只测试了RTX 4090与HX处理器配对的情况(见竞争情况)。根据我们(仍然)有限的数据库,M16的GPU在所有测试中都比该卡的平均速度慢10%左右,这多少有点不令人意外。这款Razer Blade 16配有稍慢的RTX 4080,仅落后4%。
在电池模式下,3D性能急剧下降,在Fire Strike ,从最初的44,000分只剩下9,000分,代表了几乎80%的下降!
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Lenovo Legion 7 16IAX7-82TD004SGE -1! | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
Alienware x15 R2 P111F | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Acer Predator Triton 500 SE PT516-52s-70KX -1! | |
Razer Blade 15 RZ09-0421NGG3-R3G1 -1! | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z -1! |
3DMark 11 Performance | 41060 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 33550 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 15939 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=225, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=215, last 2 years) |
Far Cry 6 | |
2560x1440 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (85 - 146, n=12) | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (21.5 - 146, n=28, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T | |
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (81 - 116, n=5) | |
Average of class Gaming (53 - 119, n=11, last 2 years) |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands - 2560x1440 Badass Preset (DX12) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 Raptor Lake | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (103.4 - 137.8, n=14) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X | |
Average of class Gaming (13.6 - 137.8, n=47, last 2 years) |
在我们的Witcher 3 压力测试一小时后,真的很明显,性能与RTX 4080处于同一水平。RTX 4080搭配HX处理器的水平。尽管如此,性能还是一如既往的高。
我们的GPU-Z日志数据很好地突出了Turbo和Performance模式之间的差异:时钟频率(1.9GHz对1.5GHz),温度(70对66℃),功耗(140对93瓦),甚至内存时钟速度(2275对2250MHz)都不同。帧率从175左右下降到大约145帧。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K | |
GTA V (2015) | 186 | 183.1 | 179.8 | 127.7 | 123 | ||
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 444 | 371 | 305 | 178 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 192.9 | 177.3 | 169.9 | 160.7 | 161.9 | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 199.1 | 184.5 | 158.6 | 129.5 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 177.2 | 154.7 | 116.4 | 121.8 | |||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 195 | 168 | 156 | 133 | 145 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 445 | 357 | 343 | 315 | 255 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 172 | 150 | 90 | ||||
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 102 | 91 | 58 | ||||
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 126 | 111 | 69 | ||||
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 111 | 108 | 73 | ||||
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 145.2 | 103.4 | 53.6 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 104.49 | 75.69 | 41.9 | ||||
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 144.06 | 109.64 | 62.33 | ||||
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) | 59.4 | ||||||
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) | 148 | 111 | 98 | 69 | |||
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) | 98.1 | 93.3 | 65.7 | ||||
The Callisto Protocol (2022) | 113.23 | 90.48 | 53.5 |
排放 - 毫无疑问,涡轮机的声音很大
噪声排放
在安静模式下,风扇在空闲时大多不活动,在轻度负载下也是如此,如写作或上网。即使在制造商认为类似于平衡模式的 "性能"模式下,风扇也经常在空闲时运转。
对于我们的基准测试,我们使用涡轮模式。风扇只是在空闲时可以忍受,从来没有安静过,只有在重载时才会咆哮到最大。在这一点上,它们保持在一个恒定的57分贝,使其成为同类产品中最响亮的笔记本电脑之一。只有微星Titan GT77在最大负荷下的声音更大,但在游戏时至少更安静。值得指出的是,许多笔记本电脑有一个涡轮增压模式,风扇在空闲时以最大速度运行,这就是为什么我们经常避免使用这种测试模式。M16的涡轮模式有些不同,但在游戏时,耳机仍然是必须的。
在性能模式下,噪音水平是可以容忍的,与竞争对手相当。在Witcher 3 ,我们只测得49分贝,而不是57分贝。作为回报,游戏性能下降了约15%至18%。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24 / 29.96 / 34.27 dB(A) |
Load |
| 35.89 / 57.54 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A) |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0) | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -0% | -7% | -3% | 11% | |
off / environment * | 24 | 23 4% | 23.9 -0% | 24.6 -3% | 24 -0% | 23 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 24 | 23 4% | 23.9 -0% | 29.2 -22% | 26 -8% | 23 4% |
Idle Average * | 29.96 | 24 20% | 32.6 -9% | 29.2 3% | 28 7% | 23 23% |
Idle Maximum * | 34.27 | 47 -37% | 32.6 5% | 29.2 15% | 34 1% | 23.6 31% |
Load Average * | 35.89 | 47.91 -33% | 35.9 -0% | 50.7 -41% | 47 -31% | 39 -9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 57.5 | 48.91 15% | 53.3 7% | 55 4% | 51.6 10% | |
Load Maximum * | 57.54 | 50.25 13% | 55.8 3% | 61 -6% | 56 3% | 51.3 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
M16有点热,特别是在设备的底部。在最大压力下,测得的热点略低于60℃,它们可以在中央和背面找到。游戏时,热点本身的温度只达到50℃左右。
相比之下,掌托大部分时间保持凉爽,这也部分适用于WASD键。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | -3% | 10% | -13% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 50 | 52 -4% | 54 -8% | 40.6 19% | 48 4% | 40 20% |
Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 51 12% | 46 21% | 41.1 29% | 49 16% | 37.6 35% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 29 -12% | 30 -15% | 26.2 -1% | 40 -54% | 32.4 -25% |
Idle Bottom * | 28 | 33 -18% | 31 -11% | 30.3 -8% | 33 -18% | 31.4 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试中,CPU时钟在2.2和4GHz之间波动,即时钟速度在较长时间内徘徊在高端。与此平行,CPU的功耗也有变化,平均为77瓦。然而,它也可以上升到120瓦,并再次下降到40瓦。根据其他数值,温度以类似的方式波动,CPU加热到98℃,平均为88℃。
在性能模式下,与CPU的差别实际上并不大,温度、功耗和时钟速度彼此之间没有特别大的差别,但仍然以高速度波动。
GPU的数值(甚至是内存时钟)波动非常强烈。核心时钟速度平均为1.3GHz,功耗平均为58瓦,温度约为64℃。
在性能模式下,这些数值只是略低。时钟速度下降了200MHz左右,温度同样很高,功耗在42瓦左右。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 3,3 | 1.324 | 88 | 64 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 668 | 1.830 | 69 | 70 |
发言人
与许多其他制造商相比,华硕为笔记本电脑配备了四个扬声器而不是两个。这有一个积极的效果,因为它们可以变得相对响亮,提供平衡的中音和高音,甚至低音也比不幸的和典型的竞争时的情况更有力。
通过3.5毫米音频插孔连接外部模拟设备,可以获得额外的音频乐趣。
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.45 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 高效的游戏,高空闲消耗
消耗功率
设置为最小亮度、安静和飞行模式,空闲使用时的消耗量约为20瓦,有点高。当游戏和重载时,英特尔HX处理器会显得比一些类似能力的HX竞争对手(甚至那些有RTX 4080的)消耗更多的电力。
在很短的时间内,我们在大型但平坦的电源装置(约18 x 8.3 x 2.5厘米)上测量了最大267瓦的负载峰值。这是为280瓦设计的,因此提供了足够的储备。
Off / Standby | 0.032 / 6.7 Watt |
Idle | 20 / 24 / 25 Watt |
Load |
107 / 267 Watt |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR (RAID 0), IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | -26% | -10% | -14% | -17% | -12% | 9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20 | 10.8 46% | 17.3 13% | 14 30% | 18 10% | 15.2 24% | 16.8 ? 16% | 13.7 ? 31% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 17 29% | 27 -13% | 21.6 10% | 24 -0% | 22.8 5% | 23.2 ? 3% | 19.1 ? 20% |
Idle Maximum * | 25 | 17.8 29% | 46 -84% | 24.8 1% | 32 -28% | 49.8 -99% | 34.3 ? -37% | 26.8 ? -7% |
Load Average * | 107 | 116 -8% | 133 -24% | 122.5 -14% | 130 -21% | 121.2 -13% | 130 ? -21% | 110.9 ? -4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 208 | 144 31% | 265 -27% | 260 -25% | 242 -16% | |||
Load Maximum * | 267 | 220 18% | 329 -23% | 418 -57% | 320 -20% | 273.7 -3% | 326 ? -22% | 250 ? 6% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
Zephyrus M16的电池容量为90瓦,这意味着华硕笔记本电脑在降低亮度时可以实现约4.5小时的WiFi使用。
在全亮度下,可以实现3小时的互联网冲浪(多区Mini-LED)。在降低亮度的情况下,这可以上升到近4.5小时。
总而言之,电池寿命不是特别好,这是由于高闲置消耗造成的。
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 25% | 15% | -0% | -6% | -6% | 10% | |
H.264 | 285 | 436 53% | 419 47% | 358 26% | 399 ? 40% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 259 | 445 72% | 428 65% | 319 23% | 303 17% | 365 41% | 368 ? 42% |
Load | 173 | 86 -50% | 56 -68% | 86 -50% | 124 -28% | 81 -53% | 84.2 ? -51% |
Witcher 3 ultra | 53 | 81.6 ? | |||||
Reader / Idle | 385 | 533 | 544 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语--(尚未)像其前辈那样进行优化
当谈到最新一代的笔记本电脑时,制造商喜欢给我们发送高端系统。而且,是的,RTX 4090和英特尔Gen13不仅在纸面上令人印象深刻。与上一代相比,性能和效率都有明显提高。更重要的是,奇妙的迷你LED星云显示屏是主要亮点的竞争者,几乎能把CPU和GPU放在阴影下。
我们已经发现它的前辈是一个全面的、优化的游戏机。一般来说,但不是明确的,这也适用于新的华硕M16。与目前大多数新的笔记本电脑类似,我们正在处理CPU和GPU方面的双代飞跃。然而,这种变化并不总是顺利地运行。目前,许多RTX 40笔记本电脑由于尚未最终确定的驱动程序优化而遭受高延迟。此外,M16的空闲功耗有些过高。这导致了次优的电池寿命,但在软件更新的帮助下,这一点是可以解决的。另外,由于许多隐藏的螺丝和SO-DIMM内存,华硕给维护工作带来了不必要的困难,这也让人有点恼火。此外,省略了一个LAN端口,这对玩家来说很难理解,而且最高端的RTX 4090与H CPU的运行速度 "只 "相当于一个RTX 4080搭配HX CPU的速度。
华硕ROG Zephyrus M16搭配RTX 4090是一个强大的游戏包,配备了梦幻般的迷你LED显示屏,并且功率充足--即使是在4K下。然而,价格很高,有一些小问题需要解决。
对于许多人来说,非常高的价格将是一个真正的缺点,但是,像往常一样,当可能的(更便宜的)替代品到达时,我们将广泛地审查它们。
价格和可用性
目前,只能预购新的M16。然而,该机器计划在本月(2023年3月)出现。
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VY-NM042X
-
03/15/2023 v7
Christian Hintze
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.