结论 - 体面的最后一搏图形增强功能
蝠蜩∫音濶イ Radeon RX 7600M XT不常见是有道理的。遗憾的是，与现代经济型 Nvidia GPU（如 GeForce RTX 4050 相比，RTX 4050 的性能往往超过 AMD 解决方案，而功耗却只有后者的一半。它的目标是 1080p 游戏，但最新的游戏已经证明其性能不堪一击。如果不是因为 AD-GP1 昂贵的 400 至 500 美元零售价，我们还能接受它的这些缺点。
尽管如此，AD-GP1 与集成了英特尔或 AMD 图形处理器的笔记本电脑或迷你 PC 搭配使用时，即使底层的 Radeon RX 7600M XT GPU 不是最新或最高效的，也会有所改进。如果没有其他办法提升现有 PC 的图形性能，它可以被视为便携式的最后解决方案。
Pros
Cons
GMK AD-GP1 是一款集成 Radeon 7600M XT 的小型外置 GPU（eGPU）解决方案。它与其他小型 eGPU 直接竞争，包括 GPD G1也采用了相同的 AMD 图形处理器。
规格
案例
由于通风栅的设计，该设备应水平放置。虽然该设备本身相当小巧，大小与英特尔 NUC Canyon 差不多，但其笨重的 240 W 电源模块也同样大，可以说非常碍眼。
连接性
该底座最多可通过 DisplayPort 2.0 或 HDMI 2.1 输出四个外部显示器。请注意，单个 USB-C 4.0 端口不能用作 DisplayPort，因为它主要用于连接主机 PC（如果不兼容 OcuLink）或 100 W Power Delivery 充电。
性能
测试条件
系统性能
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (Noctua NH-L9a-AM5) | |
| Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| GMK EVO-X1 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (Noctua NH-L9a-AM5) | |
| Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
| GMK EVO-X1 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (Noctua NH-L9a-AM5) | |
| Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
| GMK EVO-X1 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (Noctua NH-L9a-AM5) | |
| Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
| GMK EVO-X1 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (Noctua NH-L9a-AM5) | |
| GMK EVO-X1 | |
| Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (Noctua NH-L9a-AM5) | |
| Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
| GMK EVO-X1 | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X (Noctua NH-L9a-AM5) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| GMK EVO-X1 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7797 points | |
Help | ||
图形处理器性能
原始性能介于GeForce RTX 4050 和RTX 4060.不过，如果运行要求更高的带有光线追踪功能的 DX12 游戏，Radeon RX 7600M XT 就会因其较 Nvidia 弱的 RT 内核而明显落后。我们在针对 RT 的 Port Royal 基准测试中获得的极低分数就说明了这一点。
总体性能仍比集成的 Radeon 890M快 2 倍到 2.5 倍。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 28454 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 24373 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 9924 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2165 points | |
Help | ||
游戏性能
旧版 DX11 游戏在 Radeon RX 7600M XT 上运行良好。然而，较新的游戏即使在 1080p 的低设置下，AD-GP1 也很难跟上。例如，《怪物猎人荒野》（Monster Hunter Wilds）在最低 1080p 设置下，如果没有 FSR 或帧生成功能的帮助，平均帧数也无法达到 60 FPS。依赖或强制使用光线追踪技术的游戏，如《夺宝奇兵》（Indiana Jones and the Great Circle），基本上无法运行。其他要求苛刻的游戏，如《惊奇对决》（Marvel Rivals），在 1080p 设置下很难保持 60 FPS，当角色和特效充满屏幕时，即使启用 FSR 也会带来非常不稳定的体验。
| Monster Hunter Wilds | |
| 1920x1080 lowest, FSR Quality, Frame Generation | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| 1920x1080 lowest, no upscaling | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
| 1920x1080 medium, no upscaling | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
| 1920x1080 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
| 2560x1440 ultra, RT: high, no upscaling | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum G7 PT | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (27.7 - 195.3, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (23.5 - 33.9, n=3) | |
| Minisforum G7 PT | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| HP OmniStudio X 32-c0077ng | |
| Minisforum G7 PT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (7.32 - 17.7, n=4) | |
| Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality FSR AF:16x | |
| Minisforum G7 PT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (10.9 - 21.8, n=2) | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle - 1920x1080 Low Preset | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows | |
| 1920x1080 High | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High + FSR Quality | |
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT (n=1) | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD FSR | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 149.8 | 122.6 | 131.8 | 109.1 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 130 | 125.3 | 89.6 | 66.5 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 83.1 | 63.3 | 45.7 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 327 | 238 | 196.6 | 167.7 | 112.4 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 91.8 | 80.3 | 71.3 | 45.6 | ||
| F1 24 (2024) | 215 | 203 | 159.4 | 29.9 | 10.9 | 7.32 |
| Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 19 | 9.6 | 8.4 | |||
| Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 56.4 | 51.7 | 20.8 | 19.5 | ||
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 55 | 51 | 44 | 17 | 14 | 14 |
排放量
系统噪音
AD-GP1 在运行低负载时非常安静，一般不会引起注意。不过，在游戏时，风扇噪音会逐渐增大，然后稳定在 57 分贝（A），与许多游戏笔记本电脑的噪音不相上下。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 30.2 / / dB(A) |
| Load |
| / dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 28 dB(A) | ||
| GMK AD-GP1 Radeon 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Minisforum MS-A1 (MGA1 Radeon RX 7600M XT @OCuLink) Radeon RX 7600M XT, Ryzen 7 8700G, Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0 | HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14 Radeon 8060S, Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, WDC PC SN810 2TB | Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-12900H, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition Radeon RX 7600, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600 | GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 8% | 17% | 8% | 11% | 16% | |
| off / environment * | 28 | 24.7 12% | 23.9 15% | 22.8 19% | 25.4 9% | 23.3 17% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30.2 | 30.7 -2% | 23.9 21% | 32.7 -8% | 26.3 13% | 27.8 8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 57.1 | 49.6 13% | 49.1 14% | 50.3 12% | 44.2 23% | |
| Idle Average * | 30.8 | 23.9 | 32.7 | 26.3 | 30.3 | |
| Idle Maximum * | 30.8 | 26.8 | 35.3 | 26.3 | 30.4 | |
| Load Average * | 39.8 | 42.2 | 36.8 | 29.6 | 44.6 | |
| Load Maximum * | 48.8 | 49.2 | 52.9 | 39.4 | 46.1 | |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.6 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
压力测试
在运行《赛博朋克 2077》时，GPU 的频率稳定在 2341 MHz、72 C 和 156 W，代表了典型的游戏条件。在运行 FurMark 时，可记录的暂时最大功率为 200 W，这意味着 240 W 的交流适配器足以为底座供电，此外还能为通过 USB-C PD 连接的大多数设备供电。
请记住，大多数笔记本电脑中的GeForce RTX 4050 GPU 仅需 80 W 或更低，但却能提供与 AD-GP1 类似的性能。
| GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | GPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | 353 | 40 | 51 |
| FurMark Stress | 2148 | 56 | 75 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力测试 | 2431 | 75 | 72 |
潜在竞争对手比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
