测试中的 "回血"。笔记本和台式机基准测试

对抗僵尸群的合作战斗。 Back 4 Blood让人很容易联想到以前的Left 4 Dead。这也难怪，因为这款射击游戏来自同一个开发商的工作室。我们用几个笔记本和台式机的GPU检查了这个动作标题的图形要求。

Florian Glaser, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 10/23/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Laptop / Notebook Desktop Gamecheck

技术

Back 4 Blood》应该是连续射击爱好者的一个好选择。这款来自Turtle Rock Studios的僵尸射击游戏将无数的亡灵和特殊怪物送到玩家身后或虚拟猎枪前。

整个事情的发生有一个坚实的技术基础。所使用的虚幻引擎4的特点是相当好的纹理和一流的效果。除了照明之外，粒子效果（例如武器）和火焰显示（火焰、爆炸等）也很有说服力。这套作品因同质化和令人愉悦的图形风格和整体外观而更加完美。

就游戏性而言，《喋血双雄》--正如一开始提到的--与《左撇子》系列非常相似，尽管开发商遵循了当前的趋势，将重点放在了定制上。在其他方面，我们有武器升级、购物系统和特殊技能卡。可以说，《左4死》与《战地》的结合。在我们看来，枪法和动作也是最新的。

简而言之：如果你正在寻找一个有趣的，而且--取决于难度等级--相当有挑战性的子弹大餐，《Back 4 Blood》应该是一个不错的选择，尤其是你还可以在多人模式下冒充特殊的怪物，而不是人类玩家。在单人模式中，不幸的是仍然需要在线连接，你必须与半路出家的智能机器人打交道，这也有一段时间的娱乐性。

但回到技术方面。在图形菜单中，你可以在两张截图中进一步看到，有超过20个设置选项。从分辨率（不幸的是，在无边界全屏中只有显示器的原始分辨率可用；传统的全屏不存在）、视场和运动模糊等经典功能开始，还有一些现代功能，如升频（包括DLSS）和色差。

作为边缘平滑，Back 4 Blood支持FXAA和TAA。必要时，你还可以在DirectX 11和DirectX 12之间切换。如果需要，还可以启用V-Sync和FPS限制。

同样值得称赞的是各种预设的存在。这些预设负责处理五个折叠式质量滑块。设置的改变（除DirectX外）不需要重新启动，而是直接采用，这也是加分的地方。如果开发商能在各个图形选项中加入简短的文字解释，那就更好了。

游戏的大小约为25GB，以今天的标准来看是适中的。游戏中的加载时间还算不错。只有游戏的启动需要一点时间。

基准

为了获得尽可能一致的结果，我们不使用任务来做基准，而是使用你在任务之间进入的大厅营地 "希望堡"。根据我们的经验，基准序列的帧率与真实任务相当匹配。虽然后者可能会有明显的性能波动或下降，这取决于僵尸的数量和特效的数量，但平均帧率同样很高（第一幕的任务1和2在具有最大细节的RTX 3070上各检查200秒）。

在CapFrameX工具的帮助下，我们记录了30秒的仓库冲刺，其中包含各种物体、人物和火元素。由于这是一个快速的第一人称射击游戏，系统应该达到平均至少40 FPS或--为了更好地应对特别是CPU密集和图像密集的情况--超过60 FPS。

结果

对于基准，我们主要使用从我们的合作伙伴XMG (Schenker Technologies)借来的设备。和MSI.

FHD (1,920 x 1,080)

与当前其他游戏相比，《回到4号血案》不一定需要真正的游戏电脑。入门级GPU的水平为 GeForce MX450至少可以处理1,920 x 1,080像素和低预设。在作出一些妥协后，中等预设也是可能的。中档显卡如 GeForce GTX 1650(Ti)可以轻松应对全高清下的高和史诗级预设。

Back 4 Blood
1920x1080 Low Preset (DX12) 1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) AA:FX 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) AA:T 1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	378 (26.3^min, 184^P0.1, 235^P1) fps ∼50% 281 (44.4^min, 139^P0.1, 180^P1) fps ∼43% 235 (38.8^min, 121^P0.1, 148^P1) fps ∼40% 220 (43.6^min, 105^P0.1, 141^P1) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	377 (30.5^min, 185^P0.1, 239^P1) fps ∼50% 273 (40^min, 150^P0.1, 194^P1) fps ∼42% 227 (31.9^min, 137^P0.1, 162^P1) fps ∼39% 209 (25.9^min, 118^P0.1, 146^P1) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	332 (75.7^min, 152^P0.1, 189^P1) fps ∼44% 300 (70.7^min, 139^P0.1, 173^P1) fps ∼46% 274 (67.3^min, 113^P0.1, 144^P1) fps ∼47% 272 (75.9^min, 122^P0.1, 150^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	321 (56^min, 155^P0.1, 187^P1) fps ∼43% 295 (120^min, 145^P0.1, 176^P1) fps ∼45% 260 (30.6^min, 128^P0.1, 155^P1) fps ∼44% 248 (62.8^min, 128^P0.1, 155^P1) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	317 (136^min, 155^P0.1, 190^P1) fps ∼42% 290 (116^min, 129^P0.1, 168^P1) fps ∼45% 273 (97.6^min, 120^P0.1, 154^P1) fps ∼47% 270 (77.4^min, 119^P0.1, 149^P1) fps ∼45%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	288 (23.2^min, 93^P0.1, 176^P1) fps ∼38% 212 (18.5^min, 65.8^P0.1, 143^P1) fps ∼33% 181 (51.7^min, 67.1^P0.1, 124^P1) fps ∼31% 163 (57.4^min, 84.7^P0.1, 113^P1) fps ∼27%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	205 (22.6^min, 106^P0.1, 134^P1) fps ∼27% 152 (55.7^min, 87.1^P0.1, 96.8^P1) fps ∼23% 123 (26.3^min, 48.7^P0.1, 78^P1) fps ∼21% 114 (59.4^min, 61.4^P0.1, 70.2^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	197 (24.8^min, 96.1^P0.1, 124^P1) fps ∼26% 146 (57.2^min, 75.2^P0.1, 97.6^P1) fps ∼22% 126 (57.9^min, 70.9^P0.1, 83.4^P1) fps ∼21% 115 (63.4^min, 64.9^P0.1, 73.4^P1) fps ∼19%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	184 (44.8^min, 105^P0.1, 118^P1) fps ∼24% 137 (32.2^min, 69.2^P0.1, 78.3^P1) fps ∼21% 117 (6.13^min, 55.3^P0.1, 65.8^P1) fps ∼20% 110 (52.7^min, 55.6^P0.1, 59.4^P1) fps ∼18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	157 (26.9^min, 89.7^P0.1, 100^P1) fps ∼21% 106 (51.3^min, 57.1^P0.1, 63.7^P1) fps ∼16% 91.5 (47.3^min, 48.1^P0.1, 54.2^P1) fps ∼16% 83.8 (45.5^min, 45.8^P0.1, 49.7^P1) fps ∼14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	147 (22.1^min, 84.5^P0.1, 92.3^P1) fps ∼19% 96 (31.8^min, 51^P0.1, 57.2^P1) fps ∼15% 82.3 (41.8^min, 44.8^P0.1, 49.4^P1) fps ∼14% 75 (38.7^min, 40.3^P0.1, 43.8^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce MX450, i7-11370H Xiaomi RedmiBook Pro 15	77 (22.8^min, 27.1^P0.1, 41.8^P1) fps ∼10% 46.3 (13.5^min, 18.1^P0.1, 22.7^P1) fps ∼7% 35.3 (11.8^min, 12.1^P0.1, 14.9^P1) fps ∼6% 33 (13.4^min, 14.1^P0.1, 15.2^P1) fps ∼6%

QHD (2,560 x 1,440)

后面的中端GPU甚至在理论上可以处理2,560 x 1,440像素和最大细节的混合，尽管我们会推荐一个来自中高端的型号，以获得全面流畅的游戏体验（例如。 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti或 Radeon RX 5600M).

Back 4 Blood
2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	241 (76.5^min, 101^P0.1, 139^P1) fps ∼42%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	223 (67.7^min, 98^P0.1, 132^P1) fps ∼38%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	179 (59.9^min, 90.4^P0.1, 117^P1) fps ∼31%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	146 (25.2^min, 53^P0.1, 101^P1) fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	140 (39.1^min, 56.1^P0.1, 89.9^P1) fps ∼24%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	111 (19.8^min, 31.8^P0.1, 69.4^P1) fps ∼19%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	75 (26.3^min, 27.7^P0.1, 42.7^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	74.3 (25.1^min, 26.4^P0.1, 34.4^P1) fps ∼13%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	71.4 (30.5^min, 31.3^P0.1, 35.5^P1) fps ∼12%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	52.7 (22.8^min, 25.9^P0.1, 28.1^P1) fps ∼9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	49.1 (23.9^min, 24.2^P0.1, 26.2^P1) fps ∼8%

UHD (3,840 x 2,160)

另一方面，3,840 x 2,160像素与Epic预设相结合，应该只在高端代表上释放(GeForce RTX 3060以上）。)该标题的VRAM要求通常似乎在限制范围内。6GB足以满足所有常见的分辨率和质量水平。

Back 4 Blood
3840x2160 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X	151 (53.3^min, 67.3^P0.1, 103^P1) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Gaming X Trio	131 (48.9^min, 55.3^P0.1, 87.5^P1) fps ∼30%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, i9-9900K MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X	96.4 (44.5^min, 50.9^P0.1, 61.7^P1) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 15 @165 W TGP	76.6 (15.4^min, 21.6^P0.1, 45.9^P1) fps ∼17%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Neo 17 @140 W TGP	71.7 (31.9^min, 34.3^P0.1, 40.6^P1) fps ∼16%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Core 15 @130 W TGP	57.2 (14^min, 16.4^P0.1, 30.9^P1) fps ∼13%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H MSI GP65 Leopard 9SD	37.4 (19.3^min, 19.5^P0.1, 20.1^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11800H XMG Focus 17 @75 W TGP	37.3 (14.4^min, 18.1^P0.1, 19.3^P1) fps ∼8%
AMD Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H Dell G5 15 SE	36.3 (14.9^min, 15.2^P0.1, 16.4^P1) fps ∼8%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GP75	26.1 (12.4^min, 12.5^P0.1, 13^P1) fps ∼6%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, i7-10750H MSI GL75	23.3 (11.3^min, 11.5^P0.1, 12.3^P1) fps ∼5%

注意事项

由于游戏测试非常耗时，而且经常受到安装或激活限制的阻碍，因此我们只能为您提供文章发表时的部分基准测试。更多的显卡将在未来几天和几周内安装。

Overview

Test system

XMG Neo 15 (RTX 3080) - 点击照片，打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Neo 17 (RTX 3070) - 点击照片，打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Core 15 (RTX 3060) - 点击照片打开配置器 (bestware.com)

XMG Focus 17 (RTX 3050 Ti) - 点击照片打开配置器 (bestware.com)

设备	显卡	处理器	内存	操作系统
XMG Neo 15	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 @165 W TGP (16 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Neo 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3070 @140 W TGP (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Core 15	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3060 @130 W TGP (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
XMG Focus 17	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3050 Ti @75 W TGP (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-11800H	2 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
微星GP65	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-9750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64位
微星GP75	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 Ti (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64位
微星GL75	NvidiaGeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i7-10750H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
小米RedmiBook Pro 15	NvidiaGeForce MX450 (2 GB GDDR5)	Intel Core i7-11370H	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64位
戴尔G5 15 SE	AMD Radeon RX 5600M (6 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	2 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64位
微星 Prestige 14 Evo	Intel Iris Xe (96 CUs)	Intel Core i7-1185G7	1 x 16 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
台式电脑I	MSIGeForce RTX 3090 (24 GB GDDR6X) MSIGeForce RTX 3080 (10 GB GDDR6X) MSIGeForce RTX 3070 (8 GB GDDR6)	Intel Core i9-9900K	4 x 8 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit
桌面-PC II	NvidiaGeForce RTX 3090 FE (24 GB GDDR6X) Nvidia Titan RTX (24 GB GDDR6) NvidiaGeForce RTX 2070 Super (8 GB GDDR6)NvidiaGeForce RTX 2060 Super (8 GB GDDR6) KFA2GeForce GTX 1660 Super (6 GB GDDR6) PNYGeForce GTX 1660 (6 GB GDDR5) KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 Super(4 GB GDDR6) KFA2GeForce GTX 1650 (4 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (12 GB DDR6) AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD RadeonRX 5700 XT (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5700 (8 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT (6 GB GDDR6) AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT (8 GB GDDR6)	AMD Ryzen 9 5900X	2 x 32 GB DDR4	Windows 10 64 Bit

4K显示器	Nvidia驱动	AMD驱动
华硕PB287Q,飞利浦Brilliance 329P9H, Acer Predator XB321HK	ForceWare 496.13	Adrenalin 21.10.2

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 392227 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 22359 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 测试中的 "回血"。笔记本和台式机基准测试

Florian Glaser, 2021-10-23 (Update: 2021-10-23)

Legend
5	Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
	May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60	Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
	May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?	Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
	Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Pos	Model	< Prev Next > Back 4 Blood (2021)
Pos	Model	low 1280x720 Low Preset (DX12)	med. 1920x1080 Medium Preset (DX12) FXAA	high 1920x1080 High Preset (DX12) TAA	ultra 1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA	QHD 2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA	4K 3840x2160 Epic Preset (DX12) TAA
578	AMD Radeon 520
510	AMD Radeon 530
359*	AMD Radeon 540X	62.7	21.9	18.3
579	AMD Radeon 610
581*	AMD Radeon 610M
569	AMD Radeon 620
511	AMD Radeon 625
358	AMD Radeon 630
283	AMD Radeon 660M	104.3	40.4	34.3
249	AMD Radeon 680M	167	65.2	54.4	49.3
424*	AMD Radeon 740M
281*	AMD Radeon 760M
241*	AMD Radeon 780M
1041	AMD Radeon HD 6250
1032	AMD Radeon HD 6290
1020*	AMD Radeon HD 6310
1018*	AMD Radeon HD 6320
992*	AMD Radeon HD 6330M
972*	AMD Radeon HD 6350M
Pos	Model	< Prev Next >Back 4 Blood
Pos	Model	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
930	AMD Radeon HD 6370M
964*	AMD Radeon HD 6380G
963*	AMD Radeon HD 6430M
933	AMD Radeon HD 6450M
890	AMD Radeon HD 6470M
916*	AMD Radeon HD 6480G
844	AMD Radeon HD 6490M
903	AMD Radeon HD 6520G
755	AMD Radeon HD 6530M
743	AMD Radeon HD 6550M
657	AMD Radeon HD 6570M
824	AMD Radeon HD 6620G
747	AMD Radeon HD 6630M
697	AMD Radeon HD 6650M
653*	AMD Radeon HD 6730M
641	AMD Radeon HD 6750M
616	AMD Radeon HD 6770M