结论——与大牌并驾齐驱
我们对Laptop 13.5的主要批评之一是，与戴尔 XPS、联想 Yoga 或惠普 OmniBook 系列等更知名的专业级消费笔记本相比，它为了提升可维护性和实用性而牺牲了机身刚性和坚固性。 Laptop 13 Pro 直面这一问题，采用了更坚固的机身设计，与前代机型相比，手感瞬间更显扎实且坚不可摧。 材质质量的飞跃如此显著，以至于这可以说是选择 Laptop 13 Pro 而非标准版 Laptop 13.5 的最大理由——毕竟这两款机型在其他方面几乎拥有相同的组件和显示屏选项。考虑到其出色的可维修性以及代际间的巨大改进，略微增加的重量只是微不足道的代价。
除了机身设计外，电池续航时间也实现了同样令人印象深刻的提升，这主要得益于高效的Panther Lake处理器。
Laptop 13.5 遗留的一个显著缺点依然存在：核心温度过高。在满载运行时，CPU 温度可达 90+ C，而配备完全相同 Core Ultra X7 处理器的戴尔 XPS 13 仅为 74 C，这很可能是由于 Framework 的散热方案较小所致。 遗憾的是，从 SODIMM 切换到 LPCAMM2 所节省的空间并未用于增强散热。因此，Turbo Boost 性能受到负面影响，实际性能也低于预期。 这并非说 Laptop 13 Pro 运行迟缓，但根据我们对竞品 Panther Lake 笔记本的体验来看，它的速度本可以更快。
鉴于 Framework 笔记本并非主要面向多媒体内容消费而设计，缺乏 OLED 和 HDR 功能尚可理解。不过，缺少 P3 色域可能会让部分专业艺术家望而却步。
对于未来的配置，我们希望看到可选配的 Gorilla Glass 来加固机盖、支持 vPro 技术，以及配备带专用鼠标按键的点击板，以进一步拓展该设计的多功能性。
Pros
+ 在可维修性、可定制性和售后支持方面依然独占鳌头
+ 机身结构和刚性显著提升
+ 作为IPS触摸屏，亮度非常高
+ 可更换的接口和主板
+ 舒适的键盘
+ 电池续航时间长
Cons
- Turbo Boost 性能还有提升空间
- 高负载下核心温度较高
- 塑料显示屏边框质感略显廉价
- 扬声器表现尚有提升空间
- 不支持 HDR 且无 OLED 选项
- 机身略重
- $2,777.22Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 13.3" Touchscreen QHD+ Copilot+ PC Notebook - 32GB RAM - 512GB SSD - Windows 11 Pro
- $38.69tomtoc 360° Protective Laptop Shoulder Bag for 13-inch MacBook Air M5/A3449
- $569.98NIMO Thin & Light Gaming Laptop, 15.6" FHD IPS Display, AMD R7 7735HS(Up to 4.75 GHz, Beat i7-12650H) Computer with 16GB DDR5 RAM 512GB SSD, 180° Vewing, Radeon 680M, Portable for Business, College
Framework Laptop 13 Pro 于今年四月刚刚发布，是 Framework 产品线中的最新机型，旨在与久经考验但或许已显老旧的 Framework Laptop 13 形成互补。 尽管制造商不会直接承认，但 Laptop 13 Pro 实质上是初代 Laptop 13.5 的继任者，因为它在解决诸多问题的同时，尽可能保持了与现有组件的兼容性和可维修性。 用户可选择搭载英特尔 Panther Lake 或 AMD Ryzen AI 300 Zen 5 处理器的配置，前者支持 LPCAMM2 内存，后者支持 DDR5 SODIMM 内存。
我们测试的机型采用中端英特尔配置，搭载 Core Ultra X7 358H 处理器，售价约为 3000 美元。具体价格会根据内存、存储和配件的不同而波动很大。目前所有配置均标配同一款 2880 x 1920 分辨率的 120 Hz IPS 触摸屏。
Laptop 13 Pro 的竞争对手包括戴尔 XPS 13、联想 ThinkPad T或Yoga Pro 9 系列、微软 Surface Laptop 以及华硕 ExpertBook Ultra 等传统专业级翻盖式笔记本。
更多 Framework 评测：
规格
Framework Laptop 13 Pro (Laptop Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra X7 358H 16c/16t, 4 x 4.8 GHz Intel Cougar Cove P-Core, 8 x 3.7 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core, 4 x 3.3 GHz Intel Darkmont E-Core, 58 W PL2 / Short Burst, 31 W PL1 / Sustained, Panther Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU, Core: 1900 MHz, LPDDR5X, 32.0.101.8628
Memory
32 GB
, Micron, LPDDR5-4266, Dual-Channel, LPCAMM2
Display
13.50 inch 3:2, 2880 x 1920 pixel 256 PPI, 10-point capacitive, MND508ZB1-1, IPS, glossy: no, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Panther Lake-H PCH
Storage
WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, 1024 GB
Weight
1.437 kg, Power Supply: 370 g
Price
3000 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
新机身采用6063铝合金材质，相比原版Laptop 13.5，在无需增加机身厚度的情况下，提供了更强劲的强度和更高的刚性。不过需要注意的是，新款机型的重量也比Laptop 13.5略重一些。
我们测试的这台样机配备了半透明塑料边框和薰衣草色键盘。
连接性
沟通
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
Framework Laptop 13 Pro; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1637 (1617-1668) MBit/s
Framework Laptop 13 Pro; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1620 (1502-1685) MBit/s
网络摄像头
尽管Framework宣传其传感器为9.2 MP，但即使安装了制造商提供的最新官方驱动程序，我们的网络摄像头的最高分辨率也仅为2.1 MP。
红外功能和物理快门均为标配。
10.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
23 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
13 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
16 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
配件
大家熟悉的扩展卡再次登场，同时还有10 Gbps RJ-45、HDMI 2.0b等新成员，以及边框和键盘的更多配色选择。
维护
Framework Laptop 13 Pro 的官方拆解指南可在此处查阅。
可持续发展
机身由高达75%的消费前（而非消费后）再生铝制成，且采用100%可回收包装。不过，包装中仍使用了一些塑料板作为保护材料。
需要注意的是，如果现有用户希望升级，旧款Laptop 13.5的主板可以物理迁移到新款Laptop 13 Pro的机身中。
保修
若在美国购买，产品标配一年有限制造商保修。
输入设备
显示
新款 IPS 显示屏与旧款Laptop 13.5的显示屏具有相同的原生分辨率、sRGB 色域、黑白响应时间以及 120 Hz 刷新率，因此能提供非常相似的观看体验。 不过，它新增了一些辅助功能升级，包括更亮的背光、可降至30 Hz的可变刷新率（VRR）以及对触摸屏的支持。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
MND508ZB1-1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 773.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 722.2 cd/m² Minimum: 7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 773.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 2148:1 (Black: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2.14 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
calibrated: 0.61
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.9 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
71.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.6% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
70.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 7010 K
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro MND508ZB1-1, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5", 120 Hz | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 BOE NE135A1M-NY1, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5", 120 Hz | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 LQ138P1JX61, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8", 120 Hz | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG ATNA33AA07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Samsung ATNA40LE01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 140WT2, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 18% | 25% | 19% | 26% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 70.7 | 71.9 2% | 96.5 36% | 99.9 41% | 96.2 36% | 99.7 41% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.6 | 95.9 -4% | 97.8 -2% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 71.9 | 70.8 -2% | 86.5 20% | 95.7 33% | 86.7 21% | 98.2 37% |
| Response Times | -4% | 6% | 95% | 97% | 97% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 35.1 ? | 40 ? -14% | 38.8 ? -11% | 1.8 ? 95% | 0.71 ? 98% | 0.75 ? 98% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 23.6 ? | 22.3 ? 6% | 18.3 ? 22% | 1.5 ? 94% | 0.94 ? 96% | 1.03 ? 96% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 60 ? | 968.8 ? | 240.62 ? | |||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 33 | 20 | 29 | |||
| Screen | -75% | 6% | 460% | 12% | -1% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 773.3 | 529.9 -31% | 617 -20% | 394 -49% | 600.5 -22% | 393.8 -49% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 722 | 506 -30% | 623 -14% | 395 -45% | 612 -15% | 389 -46% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 87 | 94 8% | 91 5% | 98 13% | 96 10% | 96 10% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.36 | 0.3 17% | 0.44 -22% | 0.005 99% | ||
| Contrast (:1) | 2148 | 1766 -18% | 1402 -35% | 78800 3569% | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.14 | 5.7 -166% | 0.9 58% | 1.67 22% | 1.18 45% | 1.27 41% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.25 | 10.6 -149% | 2.2 48% | 3.9 8% | 3.4 20% | 3.35 21% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.61 | 1.5 -146% | 0.73 -20% | 0.71 -16% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 7.5 -159% | 2 31% | 1.2 59% | 1 66% | 2 31% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.07 106% | 2.19 100% | 2.212 99% | 2.27 97% | 2.19 100% |
| CCT | 7010 93% | 6967 93% | 6810 95% | 6470 100% | 6567 99% | 6379 102% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -27% /
-49% | 10% /
9% | 193% /
303% | 43% /
28% | 41% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 35.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7748 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 和 BIOS 均设置为“性能”模式。
处理器性能
其多线程原始性能比搭载相同Core Ultra X7 358H处理器的其他电脑（包括新款戴尔XPS 13）慢5%至15%。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2056 (1986.89-2374.87) Points
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: Ø2507 (2436.8-2822.67) Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100: Ø1661 (1593.24-1992.73) Points
MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H: Ø1637 (1576.85-2196.6) Points
Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2886 (2802.49-3038.82) Points
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H: Ø2340 (2099.85-3134.55) Points
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 -1! | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| HP OmniBook 7 Aero 13-bg1077nr -1! | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG -1! | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Core Ultra 7 155H -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 -2! | |
| Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 -3! | |
| HP EliteBook 8 Flip G1i 13 -1! | |
| HP Elite Dragonfly G3 -5! | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 -7! | |
| Cinebench 2026 / CPU Multi | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (3446 - 4512, n=6) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
CPU Performance rating: Percent
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench 2026: CPU Multi
Cinebench 2024: CPU Single Core | CPU Multi Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro -1! | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG -2! | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA -1! | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (12221 - 18710, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (29930 - 96559, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (3910 - 4955, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (63425 - 63827, n=2) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (4735 - 7038, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (14716 - 50766, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (5127 - 68737, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (932 - 1179, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (6506 - 9612, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (30538 - 88533, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG (v8.20.8100) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (3721 - 4475, n=9) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro (v8.20.8100) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
Performance rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 -4! | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (8834 - 9880, n=10) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (10282 - 11263, n=9) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (13908 - 16780, n=9) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (11524 - 13893, n=9) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1884 - 2182, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1678 - 1960, n=10) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2241 - 2563, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1560 - 1855, n=10) | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (293 - 350, n=10) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (278 - 310, n=9) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (445 - 465, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9061 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (102745 - 132135, n=9) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (97755 - 120727, n=10) | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (105712 - 134998, n=10) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (84.1 - 103.3, n=10) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6855 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
5733 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
408.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
513.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3196 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3656 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
77.38 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
135.6 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
Framework Laptop 13 Pro WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø7020 (6381.6-7074.85) MB/s
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6511 (5854.24-6961.71) MB/s
GPU性能
与配备相同Arc B390GPU 的其他电脑相比，其图形性能大约慢了 20%。
| 功耗配置文件 | 图形得分 | 物理性能得分 | 综合得分 |
| 性能模式 | 13410 | 24139 | 3843 |
| 平衡模式 | 13442 | 23168 | 3836 |
| 电池电量 | 13901 | 23994 | 3894 |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 14386 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 34227 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 11342 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5915 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
Performance rating | Cyberpunk 2077 | Baldur's Gate 3 | GTA V | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | Strange Brigade | Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11
| Cyberpunk 2077 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro | |
| MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 | |
| Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
GTA V | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 | F1 24
《赛博朋克2077》极高画质帧率图表
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU: Ø35.1 (29.4-37.1) fps
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M: Ø22.8 (21.9-23.7) fps
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 134.2 | 121.9 | 82.3 | 35.4 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 102.8 | 67.8 | 83.9 | 79.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 101.3 | 62.3 | 43.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56.1 | 44.4 | 37.2 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 254 | 104.4 | 91.8 | 80.4 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 55.9 | 47.6 | 42.5 | 41.7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 65.3 | 51.8 | 44.6 | 38.3 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 118.4 | 107.3 | 82.9 | 30.5 |
排放
系统噪音
即使在“性能”模式下，这款风扇的运行噪音也明显比我们之前体验过的初代Laptop 13.5要小。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 23.4 / 23.4 / 23.4 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 30.5 / 35.8 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) | ||
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -18% | -3% | -10% | -3% | -6% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 23.4 | 24.2 -3% | 25.1 -7% | 25 -7% | 22.9 2% | 22.9 2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 23.4 | 24.4 -4% | 25.1 -7% | 26 -11% | 23.4 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 23.4 | 24.4 -4% | 25.1 -7% | 27 -15% | 23.4 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 23.4 | 28 -20% | 25.1 -7% | 28 -20% | 23.4 -0% | 23.3 -0% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 30.5 | 46.2 -51% | 25.1 18% | 31 -2% | 28.6 6% | 34 -11% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 40.4 | 45.8 -13% | 37.4 7% | 41 -1% | 42.8 -6% | 43.5 -8% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 35.8 | 45.9 -28% | 42.4 -18% | 42 -17% | 45.2 -26% | 45.7 -28% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.2 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.4 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-4 °C / -7.2 F).
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45 | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | 6% | 5% | 13% | 16% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.2 | 42.2 2% | 44.4 -3% | 42 3% | 38.6 11% | 34 21% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 44.2 | 46.8 -6% | 42.5 4% | 41 7% | 38.4 13% | 35.8 19% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 29.2 | 31 -6% | 25.9 11% | 24.6 16% | 25.6 12% | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 29.8 | 32.2 -8% | 26 13% | 26 13% | 26.4 11% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
CPU 频率会短暂提升至 2.8 GHz，功耗达到 55 W，但仅持续约 20 秒，随后便稳定在 2 GHz、32 W 和 92 摄氏度。
| 平均 CPU 时钟频率 (GHz) | GPU 时钟频率 (MHz) | 平均 CPU 温度 (°C) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | 900 | 36 |
| Prime95 压力测试 | 2.0 | 900 | 92 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力测试 | 1.6 | 1300 | 88 |
| 《赛博朋克2077》压力测试 | 0.7 | 1900 | 79 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Framework Laptop 13 Pro audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.72 Watt |
| Idle | 2.3 / 8.4 / 8.5 Watt |
| Load |
32.1 / 84.2 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-1T00-1101, IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5" | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, , IPS, 2880x1920, 13.5" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45, SK hynix PVC10 HFS512GEM4X182N, IPS, 2304x1536, 13.8" | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9E1 MZVLC2T0HBLD, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -50% | 21% | 8% | -3% | -6% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.3 | 7.6 -230% | 1.7 26% | 3.5 -52% | 3.5 -52% | 3.1 -35% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 8.4 | 11.3 -35% | 6.8 19% | 4 52% | 4 52% | 3.6 57% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 8.5 | 11.5 -35% | 7.5 12% | 6.4 25% | 5.3 38% | 10 -18% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 32.1 | 54.7 -70% | 28 13% | 44 -37% | 43.7 -36% | 39.2 -22% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 47.4 | 51.3 -8% | 38.1 20% | 61.4 -30% | 51.2 -8% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 52.9 | 54.6 -3% | 37.9 28% | 41 22% | 61.3 -16% | 51.4 3% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 84.2 | 60.9 28% | 61.3 27% | 54 36% | 63.4 25% | 101.4 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø61.5 (56.2-82.7) Watt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø59 (56.8-60.9) Watt
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.67 (3.35-5.45) Watt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø8.46 (7.43-9.99) Watt
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø52.9 (51.6-54.3) Watt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø54.6 (52.3-57.5) Watt
外接显示器的功耗
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø55.4 (50.1-84.1) Watt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø56.9 (54.5-61) Watt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø58.9 (56.5-60.9) Watt
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø57.4 (47.9-64.4) Watt
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø43.6 (41.3-45) Watt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø56.1 (54.4-59.3) Watt
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.58 (2.24-3.32) Watt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø7.59 (7.04-9.03) Watt
Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø47.4 (46-50.3) Watt
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø51.3 (50.5-52.8) Watt
电池续航时间
| Framework Laptop 13 Pro Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 74.5 Wh | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, 61 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 SD X2 Plus X2P-64-100, Adreno X2-45, 54 Wh | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, 53.8 Wh | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | ||||||
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 19.3 | 8 -59% | 18.9 -2% | 12 -38% | 16.1 -17% | 16.8 -13% |
Notebookcheck 评分
Framework Laptop 13 Pro 相比标准版 Laptop 13.5 显得更加坚固且更具专业感，同时仍保持了可维修性和与组件的兼容性。
Framework Laptop 13 Pro
- 07/28/2026 v8
Allen Ngo
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 87.9%  | Framework Laptop 13 Pro Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,777.22 Dell Pro 13 Premium PA13250 ... 2. $38.69 tomtoc 360° Protective Lapt... 3. $569.98 NIMO Thin & Light Gaming Lap... List Price: 3000 USD | 1.4 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" 2880x1920 256 PPI IPS |
2. 83.8%  | Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 2100 USD | 1.3 kg | 15.85 mm | 13.50" 2880x1920 256 PPI IPS |
3. 88.4%  | Microsoft Surface Laptop 8 13.8 Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Plus X2P-64-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X2 Adreno X2-45 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1699€ | 1.3 kg | 17.5 mm | 13.80" 2304x1536 201 PPI IPS |
4. 84%  | MSI Prestige 13 AI+ A3MG Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1600 EUR | 888 g | 15.9 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED |
5. 87.6%  | Asus ExpertBook Ultra B9406CAA Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: | 1.1 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
6. 87.4%  | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,599.99 Dell XPS 14 Premium Laptop D... 2. $1,499.99 Dell XPS 13 9350, 13.4" FHD+... 3. $2,399.99 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... List Price: 2200 USD | 1.4 kg | 14.62 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
