结论：Mac的强劲竞争对手
2025年，联想推出了X9-15，以此与苹果MacBook Air 15一较高下。随着2026年ThinkPad X9系列的扩充——联想ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Aura Edition的推出，情况就没那么明确了： 这款设备的性能虽然比旧款更强，但还无法与 MacBook Pro 等机型相提并论。当然，目前市面上也没有 15 英寸的 MacBook Pro。
从许多方面来看，ThinkPad X9-15p 处于 MacBook Pro 和 MacBook Air 之间：它比 MacBook Air 功能更全面、实用性更强，拥有更多的接口和更优的内存配置选项，但性能略逊于 MacBook Pro。 从我们的角度来看，这种组合相当成功：这是一款品质卓越的笔记本电脑，优势众多，真正的缺点却寥寥无几。 总体而言，如果您正在寻找一款性能强劲的 15.3 英寸工作笔记本电脑，联想 ThinkPad X9-15p 第 1 代无疑是极具竞争力的选择，或许与 ThinkPad X1 Carbon 第 14 代并列为今年最佳的 ThinkPad 机型。 得益于其至少32 GB的内存，这款设备在长期使用中也应能满足您的需求。
Pros
Cons
- $1,745.00Lenovo ThinkPad X9 15 Gen 1 15.3" OLED CoPilot+ PC Touchscreen Notebook Intel Core Ultra 7 258V 32 GB LPDDR5x 1 TB SSD Intel Arc Graphics 140V Grey
- $1,665.95Lenovo Thinkpad X9-14 Gen 1 21QA0006US 14" Copilot+ PC Notebook - WUXGA - Intel Core Ultra 7 268V - vPro Technology - Intel Evo Platform - 32 GB - 1 TB SSD - English Keyboard - Black, Gray
- $1,689.00Lenovo ThinkPad X9 14 Gen 1 Aura Edition Laptop - Intel Core Ultra 7 268V (vPro), 32GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Intel Arc 140V, W11 Pro, 2.8K OLED, 120 Hz, Touch - Thunder Grey (21QA0036US)
当联想于2025年初发布ThinkPad X9系列时，其目标显然是打造一款面向企业用户的、与苹果MacBook Air竞争的产品。2026年，联想扩展了该产品线，将目标进一步锁定在苹果MacBook Pro上： 与搭载英特尔Lunar Lake处理器系列的早期Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15相比，Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1在性能方面有了更显著的提升。今天，我们将重点评测其搭载英特尔Panther Lake处理器的继任机型。
规格：Core Ultra X7 处理器和 15.3 英寸屏幕
案例：最像 MacBook 的 ThinkPad
与之前的联想 ThinkPad X9-15 相比，新款联想 ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 在设计上变化不大。 这意味着联想仍采用全铝合金机身，以深灰色为主色调，并辅以键盘、显示屏边框以及接口周围等黑色元素作为点缀。在 X9-15p 上，这一黑色接口区域略微加宽，以容纳新增的接口和更大的散热风扇。 X9-15p 还配备了向上发声的扬声器，键盘左右两侧各有一个大型扬声器格栅。
机身做工非常出色。它具备全金属设计的高端质感，机身部件几乎无法被扭曲或弯曲。 隐藏式下拉铰链同样出色：它允许屏幕完全平放（180度），且几乎没有任何晃动。此外，单手即可打开屏幕。
尽管重量增加了 200 克，但 X9-15p 的尺寸与 ThinkPad X9-15 相同。苹果 MacBook Air 15 的重量与 X9-15p 大致相当，而戴尔 XPS 16 和苹果 MacBook Pro 14 则都略重一些。 ThinkPad 是这几款中机身最厚的，其尺寸介于 MacBook Pro 和 XPS 16 之间。
连接性
联想升级了连接接口配置，在机身左侧新增了一个 Thunderbolt 4 接口，右侧则新增了一个 SD 卡读卡器。两侧仍保留了 USB-C 接口，因此设备可通过任一侧进行充电。总体而言，对于一款功能强大的多媒体笔记本电脑来说，这样的接口配置相当不错。
SD卡读卡器
如我们使用AV PRO 128 GB V60微型SD参考卡进行的测试所示，该SD卡读卡器的读写速度处于平均水平。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (22.3 - 531, n=37, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (37.3 - 1455, n=36, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
沟通
联想 ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 仅支持 Wi-Fi，不提供 RJ45 以太网接口或 5G/4G 连接功能，而是完全依赖英特尔 BE211 Wi-Fi 7 网卡。如果您使用的是现代路由器，传输速度非常出色。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 320MHz (3618 - 4557, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (906 - 3618, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 320MHz (2811 - 3244, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (996 - 2878, n=2, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 320MHz (1587 - 1757, n=11) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1212 - 2361, n=23, last 2 years) | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 7 BE211 320MHz (1440 - 1660, n=11) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2373, n=23, last 2 years) | |
网络摄像头
这款1000万像素的摄像头拍摄效果出人意料地平庸——这与我们对一款号称拥有优质网络摄像头的产品所抱有的期望相去甚远。虽然它用于视频通话绰绰有余，但远称不上出色。
安全性
虽然它是一款ThinkPad，但联想ThinkPad X9-15p的安全功能却要有限得多。例如，它既没有智能卡读卡器，也没有肯辛顿锁插槽。 此外，联想用电子快门取代了物理摄像头快门，虽然电子快门似乎运作良好，但显然无法像用一块塑料片遮挡镜头那样让人感到安心。
配件
除壁挂式 100 W USB-C GaN 充电器外，不包含其他配件。该充电器机身上还配备了一个 15 W USB-C 接口，可用于为智能手机或其他设备充电。
维护
要打开机身查看内部结构，必须拆下六颗十字螺丝，这操作相当简单。由于内存和Wi-Fi卡均采用焊接固定，且未配备WWAN卡，因此可升级的部分不多，但这款ThinkPad的可维修性相当高。 清洁风扇时无需重新涂抹导热膏，所有接口均位于子板上。内部电池未用螺丝固定，因此拆卸也很容易。遗憾的是，键盘难以更换，但其他大多数组件均可维修。
可持续发展
与所有ThinkPad笔记本电脑的标准一致，联想ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1采用无塑料、可堆肥的包装。 此外，其中50%的铝材来自回收来源。作为ThinkPad产品，您可期待其备件和更新将长期提供，同时还有视频和书面维护手册。据联想称，这款联想笔记本电脑的全生命周期二氧化碳当量排放量为138千克CO2e。
保修
在德国销售的联想 ThinkPad X9-15p 第一代产品享有 36 个月的保修期，其中包括一年带上门到门服务的“Premier Support”服务。第一年后，将恢复为常规的送修服务。由于这是面向企业的机型，保修范围也适用于全球，但不包含上门服务。 提供可选的保修升级服务。
输入设备
键盘
联想沿用了2025款联想ThinkPad X9-15 Gen 1的键盘设计。这与几乎所有其他ThinkPad机型所采用的键盘并不相同，其键帽风格有所不同，采用了更方正的巧克力键设计，键程仅为1.35毫米。 与上一代机型一样，该机型未配备数字小键盘，这一点我们很欣赏。总体而言，背光键盘提供了出色的打字体验，使撰写长篇文本变得轻松自如，尽管其表现尚不及其他ThinkPad机型。键盘布局也是如此，其垂直方向键的间距较紧凑。
触控板
联想 ThinkPad X9-15p 第一代放弃了标志性的 ThinkPad TrackPoint，提供了所有 ThinkPad 机型中最大的触控板。这款玻璃触控板尺寸为 13.5 × 8.5 厘米，由于采用了触觉反馈技术，您可以在任何位置点击。 就触控板而言，这款产品的使用体验极佳，在 Windows 笔记本电脑市场中，您很难找到比它更好的产品。
显示
ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Aura Edition 仅提供一种屏幕配置：一块15.3英寸2.8K（2,880 x 1,800） OLED面板，亮度为500 cd/m²，支持HDR（峰值亮度1,100 cd/m²），覆盖100% DCI-P3色域，并采用带防眩光涂层的镜面屏。 唯一的选择是屏幕是否配备可选的触控层；我们评测的机型搭载了多点触控版本。
这款由三星制造的ThinkPad OLED屏幕与前代ThinkPad X9-15的屏幕几乎完全相同。这意味着它的亮度略低于MacBook Air 15，但色彩还原效果更佳。 在启用HDR模式下测得的峰值亮度达到1,076 cd/m²。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 489 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 4.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.71}
calibrated: 5
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.96}
94.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
99.1% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
CCT: 6334 K
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 ATNA53JB03-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition ATNA53JB01-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3", 60 Hz | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H LG Philips 160WV1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16", 120 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 0% | -4% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 99.1 | 100 1% | 97.5 -2% | 99.5 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 100 | 100 0% | 98.3 -2% | 100 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 94.3 | 94.6 0% | 86.3 -8% | 96.5 2% |
| Response Times | 24% | -1691% | 30% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 1.1 ? | 1.46 ? -33% | 26.9 ? -2345% | 0.65 ? 41% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 1.4 ? | 0.44 ? 69% | 15.9 ? -1036% | 0.87 ? 38% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1194 ? | 1200 ? | 240.2 ? | |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 35 | 22 37% | 31 11% | |
| Screen | 32% | 26% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 489 | 509 4% | 538 10% | 395.4 -19% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 492 | 508 3% | 521 6% | 392 -20% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 97 -1% | 90 -8% | 95 -3% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.44 | ||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 1.1 76% | 2.1 54% | 3.69 20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.2 | 2.5 70% | 4.1 50% | 7.94 3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5 | 0.7 86% | 0.68 86% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 1.5 42% | 3.1 -19% | 1.9 27% |
| Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.28 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.28 96% |
| CCT | 6334 103% | 6294 103% | 7075 92% | 6274 104% |
| Contrast (:1) | 50900 | 1223 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
22% | -556% /
-268% | 15% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
出厂色彩配置文件显然最适合 DCI-P3 色域。该显示屏几乎完全覆盖了这一宽广色域，同时还覆盖了全部 sRGB 色域和大部分 Adobe RGB 色域，因此非常适合对色彩要求极高的工作。
在阳光直射下，光面屏幕可能会导致屏幕内容难以看清。当然，在阴凉处使用也是可以的。
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1194 Hz Amplitude: 35 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1194 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1194 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
购买联想 ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Aura 版的用户可从多款英特尔 Panther Lake 处理器中进行选择，这些处理器均至少配备 12 个 CPU 核心（Intel Core Ultra 5 338H、Ultra X7 358H、Ultra X7 368H、 Ultra X9 378H、Ultra X9 388H），并配备性能更强的英特尔集成显卡（Intel Arc B370、Arc B390）。
联想通过仅提供 32 或 64 GB 的焊接式 LPDDR5X-9600 内存，突显了 ThinkPad X9-15p 以性能为核心的设计理念。 该机型配备单条 M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘，出厂容量最高可达 2 TB。
测试条件
- 最佳能效：PL1 15 W / PL2 45 W
- 均衡型：PL1 25 W / PL2 50 W
- 最佳性能：PL1 50 W / PL2 60 W
所有基准测试均在“最佳性能”模式下进行，该模式将持续负载下的功耗控制在 50 W 以内。
处理器性能
英特尔酷睿Ultra X7 358H是一款现代化的“Panther Lake”处理器，共计16个核心：四个P核心（最高4.8 GHz）， 8个E核（最高3.7 GHz）以及4个低功耗E核（最高3.3 GHz）。该处理器的典型功耗为25 W，但峰值功耗可达80 W。更多性能对比数据请参见我们的CPU基准测试列表。
在 CPU 基准测试中，联想 ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 表现优异，不仅超越了这款 Core Ultra X7 处理器的平均水平，还击败了体积更大的戴尔 XPS 16。 与旧款联想 ThinkPad X9-15 相比，我们在所有 CPU 基准测试中测得的这款评测机型平均速度提升了约 44%。
当设备使用电池供电时，未出现 CPU 降频现象。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max -14! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 -14! | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (13187 - 19841, n=12) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4861 - 33362, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (1936 - 2087, n=11) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1128 - 2459, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (4751 - 7749, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1887 - 12912, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (736 - 792, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (425 - 853, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2375 - 3135, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (856 - 5224, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (262 - 312, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (184.8 - 326, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (100 - 557, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (171 - 218, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (55491 - 68930, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (26062 - 130368, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (5984 - 6526, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3666 - 7545, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (14309 - 17121, n=11) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4983 - 29415, n=68, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1534 - 4335, n=67, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2778 - 2927, n=11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (13951 - 17028, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4652 - 20422, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (2027 - 2142, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (805 - 2974, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (18.1 - 23.1, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 36.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (38.5 - 56.9, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (0.4127 - 0.4483, n=11) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 -1! | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H -1! | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (2214 - 50388, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (12221 - 18710, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (12867 - 201874, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (29930 - 96559, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (3910 - 4955, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (626 - 8623, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Multimedia (13483 - 181505, n=40, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (63425 - 63827, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average of class Multimedia (886 - 28794, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (4735 - 7038, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6395 - 105740, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (14716 - 50766, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8171 - 126790, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (5127 - 68737, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (932 - 1179, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (143.8 - 2022, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1014 - 26875, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (6506 - 9612, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (30538 - 88533, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8187 - 88533, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (3721 - 4475, n=9) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (569 - 4742, n=17, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition (v8.20.8100) | |
系统性能
与旧款 X9-15 相比，联想 ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Aura 版在系统性能上显然更胜一筹。在日常使用中，这款笔记本电脑运行如飞。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max -4! | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 -4! | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (8834 - 9880, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4325 - 10386, n=52, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (10282 - 11263, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8025 - 11664, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (13908 - 16780, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7323 - 18233, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (11524 - 13893, n=9) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 16240, n=51, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1884 - 2182, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (866 - 2728, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1678 - 1960, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (931 - 2489, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2241 - 2563, n=10) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (907 - 3465, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1560 - 1855, n=10) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (605 - 2024, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (136.4 - 596, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (293 - 350, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (278 - 310, n=9) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (167.3 - 402, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (445 - 465, n=10) | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (228 - 835, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9303 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (102745 - 132135, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11299 - 132135, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (97755 - 120727, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11624 - 174586, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (105712 - 134998, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11755 - 134998, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7 - 535, n=53, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra X7 358H (84.1 - 103.3, n=10) | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (327 - 7067, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
联想将存储方案从容量较小、规格为 M.2 2242 的 NVMe PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘升级为容量更大、速度更快的 M.2 2280 NVMe PCIe 5.0 固态硬盘。 我们评测机型中配备的这块 1 TB SSD 由三星制造，其性能轻松超越了本次对比中其他笔记本电脑所搭载的 SSD。不过，在持续高负载下，其性能会出现降频现象。
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Average Samsung PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU | |
| Average of class Multimedia | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速：DiskSpd 读取循环，队列深度 8
显卡
联想 ThinkPad X9-15p 搭载了英特尔 Arc B390，这是英特尔目前性能最强的集成显卡。由于该显卡没有独立显存，其 12 个 Xe³ 核心依赖系统内存运行。 在我们的基准测试中，这款显卡表现非常出色，在3DMark测试中比ThinkPad X9-15搭载的英特尔Arc 140V高出76%，在游戏测试中则高出64%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18650 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 14507 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 7842 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.92 - 141.6, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (7.61 - 144.4, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (16.9 - 141.1, n=54, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 | |
| Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition | |
《赛博朋克2077》极致画质帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 178 | 114.5 | 46.2 | 32.1 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 152.4 | 149.3 | 121.8 | 117.2 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 140.4 | 80.4 | 57.9 | 43.1 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 62.1 | 50.4 | 42.8 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 76.5 | 60 | 57.6 | 50.1 | 36.1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 84.7 | 67.6 | 58.8 | 50.4 | 29.9 |
| Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 36 | 34 | 30 | 22 | 18 |
| F1 25 (2025) | 152.2 | 126.9 | 97.5 | 19.9 |
排放
系统噪音
尽管配备了强劲的硬件组件，联想 ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Aura 版却完全不是一台噪音大的设备。 在正常使用过程中，风扇始终处于停转状态。在持续高负载下，其噪音最大值约为43.8 dB(A)，远低于苹果MacBook Pro 14和戴尔XPS 16的噪音水平，甚至低于性能较弱的X9-15。
我们未检测到任何线圈啸叫声。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 22.9 / 22.9 / 22.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 31.4 / 43.7 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.9 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -7% | -5% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 22.9 | 24.4 -7% | 23.1 -1% | 23.3 -2% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 22.9 | 24.4 -7% | 23.1 -1% | 23.4 -2% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 22.9 | 24.4 -7% | 23.1 -1% | 23.4 -2% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 22.9 | 24.4 -7% | 23.1 -1% | 25.8 -13% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 31.4 | 35.8 -14% | 36.8 -17% | 38 -21% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 43.8 | 39.4 10% | 47.8 -9% | 38.1 13% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 43.7 | 45 -3% | 53.2 -22% | 48.6 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在满载状态下，机身温度仅比旧款 ThinkPad X9-15 略高。在《赛博朋克》满载测试中，我们测得的最高温度为 45 摄氏度（即 113 华氏度），该温度出现在键盘上方的单个热点处。
在我们长达一小时的压力测试中，这款ThinkPad并未出现降频现象。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.1 °C / 102 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.3 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the class Multimedia.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.9 °C / 85.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.7 °C / 83.7 F (-1.2 °C / -2.1 F).
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU | Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 12% | 10% | 8% | 14% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.3 | 42.1 3% | 47 -9% | 44.1 -2% | 40.6 6% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 38.6 | 39.5 -2% | 40.5 -5% | 43.1 -12% | 39.8 -3% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 32.6 | 24.5 25% | 23.3 29% | 24 26% | 23.2 29% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 30.4 | 24.4 20% | 23.4 23% | 23.9 21% | 23.8 22% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想 ThinkPad X9-15p 共配备六个扬声器，音质表现出色。音量虽然可以再大一些，但扬声器能呈现出强劲的低音。总体而言，用这款笔记本听音乐是一次愉快的体验。
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗
不出所料，ThinkPad X9-15p 的功耗比其功耗较低的前代机型略高一些。无论是在满载还是空闲状态下，情况都是如此。
100 W 的充电器规格恰好能满足 97.1 W 的最大功耗需求。
| Off / Standby | 0.2 / 0.6 Watt |
| Idle | 3.5 / 4.7 / 6.2 Watt |
| Load |
59.7 / 97.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, Samsung PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 15.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP8192Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, IPS, 2880x1864, 15.3" | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, , OLED, 3200x2000, 16" | Average Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 32% | -42% | 6% | -1% | -7% | -60% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.5 | 2.4 31% | 2.5 29% | 2.2 37% | 4 -14% | 3.77 ? -8% | 5.59 ? -60% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.7 | 3.9 17% | 11.6 -147% | 11.7 -149% | 4.4 6% | 6.05 ? -29% | 10.1 ? -115% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 6.2 | 5.1 18% | 11.8 -90% | 11.8 -90% | 10.2 -65% | 8.46 ? -36% | 12.4 ? -100% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 59.7 | 42.5 29% | 95.6 -60% | 36.2 39% | 44.2 26% | 45.1 ? 24% | 64.9 ? -9% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 76.6 | 43.5 43% | 89.4 -17% | 23.5 69% | 62.6 18% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 78.4 | 40.2 49% | 86.4 -10% | 21.7 72% | 62.4 20% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 97.1 | 64.4 34% | 98.8 -2% | 37.4 61% | 94.6 3% | 82.4 ? 15% | 111.7 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗：赛博朋克 / 压力测试
功耗：外接显示器
电池续航时间
与之前的 ThinkPad X9-15 相比，联想将内置电池的容量从 80 Wh 提升至 88 Wh。在我们的 Wi-Fi/网页浏览测试（150 cd/m²）中，其电池续航时间超过 18 小时，表现非常出色。 请注意，我们的测试是在刷新率设置为 60 Hz 的情况下进行的，因为这是出厂预设值。
| Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 88 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 80 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max M5 Max, M5 Max 40-Core GPU, 72.4 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 10-Core GPU, 66.5 Wh | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Ultra X7 358H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, 70 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery runtime | 9% | -31% | -6% | -44% | -20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 (h) | 18.3 | 17.5 -4% | 15.2 -17% | 17.2 -6% | 10.3 -44% | 12.4 ? -32% |
| Load (h) | 1.8 | 2.2 22% | 1 -44% | 1.657 ? -8% | ||
| H.264 (h) | 23 | 20.2 | 16.8 ? |
Notebookcheck 评分
联想 ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 配备至少 32 GB 内存和强大的 Panther Lake Ultra X7 处理器，对于寻求 15.3 英寸高性能工作笔记本电脑的用户而言，是一款极佳的选择。
Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1
- 08/04/2026 v8
Benjamin Herzig
Total Sustainability Score: 潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 89.9%  | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15p Gen 1 Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 2500 Euro | 1.5 kg | 18 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI OLED |
2. 90.1%  | Lenovo ThinkPad X9-15 Aura Edition Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1989€ | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 15.30" 2880x1800 222 PPI OLED |
3. 90.2%  | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2026 M5 Max Apple M5 Max ⎘ Apple M5 Max 40-Core GPU ⎘ 128 GB Memory, 8192 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 8589€ | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" 3024x1964 254 PPI Mini-LED |
4. 91.6%  | Apple MacBook Air 15 M5 Apple M5 10-Core ⎘ Apple M5 10-Core GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: | 1.5 kg | 11.5 mm | 15.30" 2880x1864 224 PPI IPS |
5. 87.2%  | Dell XPS 16 Core Ultra X7 358H Intel Core Ultra X7 358H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $1,977.99 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... 2. $2,595.99 Dell Premium 16 (XPS 16 2025... 3. $2,299.00 Dell Premium 16 (XPS 16 2025... List Price: 2350 USD | 1.7 kg | 14.62 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Add as a preferred source on Google
