结论 - 优化了语音激活、性能和人工智能加速功能
钛合金 GTI12 UltraGTI12 Ultra 是 GTI11 的升级版,因为它采用了全新的设计。GTI15 Ultra 采用了与 GTI12 Ultra 相同的设计,但对处理器性能的升级却非常明显,值得性能猎手升级。集成的立体声扬声器、四麦克风、PSU 和 eGPU 支持使 Beelink 系统比市场上大多数其他迷你 PC(包括 GMK 的产品)更简洁、功能更全面。
该机型的某些方面还可以做得更好。例如,集成扬声器的音量可以更大,以便在较大的房间或会议中使用。免工具拆卸也能让内存和固态硬盘的清洁或升级变得更容易。机身正面的 LED RGB 灯条或指示灯可以与四麦克风和语音激活功能完美搭配。GTI15 Ultra 是我们测试过的功能最齐全的迷你 PC 之一,因为它集成了众多功能并支持专用的 eGPU。
GTI15 Ultra 的高价不容忽视,因为该机型是在全球内存和固态硬盘短缺的情况下推出的。该系统的售价远远超过 1000 美元,比即将上市的 GTI13 或 GTI14 型号贵得多。遗憾的是,Beelink 没有提供任何有助于降低起始价格的裸机选项。
Pros
Cons
GTI15 Ultra 是去年 GTI14 Ultra 或 GTI13 Ultra.它将老式的 Raptor Lake-H 处理器换成了新式的 Arrow Lake-H 处理器,同时还进行了其他微小的外部改动。在其他方面,它的底盘与 GTI13 Ultra 几乎完全相同。 评论仍然适用于这款最新机型。
我们的测试机配备了 Core Ultra 9 285H CPU、64 GB 内存和 1 TB SSD,售价约为 1230 美元。高端机型的内存和固态硬盘分别增至 128 GB 和 2 TB,但遗憾的是没有裸机可供选择。
GTI15 Ultra 与其他高性能迷你电脑竞争,如 GMK EVO-T1或 BOSGAME M2.
更多 Beelink 评论:
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例
与 GTI13 Ultra 一样,GTI15 Ultra 也配备了集成扬声器和内置 145 W PSU,在竞争中脱颖而出。这意味着,与市场上绝大多数迷你 PC 或笔记本电脑不同,该系统只需要一根普通的通用电源线,而不需要任何专用的交流适配器。不过,在同类产品中,该系统的体积和重量略大。
EX Pro 扩展坞通过迷你 PC 底下的 PCIe5 x8 插槽,EX Pro 扩展坞仍可安装外置显卡。有关扩展坞的更多信息,请参阅我们的 评论.
连接性
GTI15 Ultra 的后部减少了两个 USB-A 端口,因此并非 GTI13 Ultra 上的所有端口都回归了。另一方面,两个 RJ-45 端口也从 2.5 Gbps 升级到了 10 Gbps。
请注意,只有后部的 USB-C 端口支持 Power Delivery。官方不支持 Thunderbolt。
SD 读卡器
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
交流
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
维护
可持续性
Beelink 没有说明在生产过程中使用了任何回收材料。同时,包装使用了一些塑料进行包裹。
性能
测试条件
系统默认设置为平衡模式,只能通过 BIOS 更改为性能模式。将 Windows 设置为 "性能 "模式的影响很小,甚至没有影响。
处理器
原始 CPU 性能比 GMK EVO-T1配置完全相同的 Core Ultra 9 285H处理器的 GMK EVO-T1 要慢 10% 到 15%。如果希望获得更高的性能,通过 BIOS 将 Beelink 设置为性能模式有助于缩小差距。尽管如此,英特尔 CPU 仍比同类竞争产品 Ryzen 7 H 255 快 10%和 20%。 Ryzen 7 H 255分别快 10% 和 20%。
Cinebench R15 多回路运行
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (761 - 830, n=9) | |
| Minisforum MS-S1 Max | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| Geekom A8, R7 8745HS | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro | |
| Beelink SEi13 Pro | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Minisforum MS-S1 Max | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (17.9 - 27.2, n=9) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Geekom A8, R7 8745HS | |
| Beelink GTI13 Ultra | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro | |
| Beelink SEi13 Pro | |
| Geekom GT13 Pro | |
| MSI Cubi NUC AI+ 2MG | |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15160 - 24612, n=9) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (54365 - 129641, n=9) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (3695 - 5879, n=9) | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (53557 - 67157, n=9) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (6921 - 9378, n=9) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (40946 - 64632, n=9) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (58110 - 117613, n=9) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (574 - 1366, n=9) | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5509 - 13527, n=9) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (49874 - 65229, n=9) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (7492 - 7873, n=6) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10307 - 11218, n=6) | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (8818 - 10667, n=6) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10773 - 12660, n=6) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1812 - 2227, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1693 - 2170, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2125 - 2377, n=6) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1375 - 2191, n=6) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (280 - 358, n=6) | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (254 - 324, n=6) | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (418 - 465, n=6) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7492 points | |
Help | ||
Geekbench AI: Quantized GPU 1.5 | Half Precision GPU 1.5 | Single Precision GPU 1.5
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (76816 - 109252, n=9) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (75428 - 85799, n=9) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (62446 - 82553, n=9) | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (108.4 - 136.7, n=9) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Geekbench AI / Quantized GPU 1.5 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (4803 - 5289, n=3) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Geekbench AI / Half Precision GPU 1.5 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (9377 - 11969, n=3) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Geekbench AI / Single Precision GPU 1.5 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (7262 - 7954, n=3) | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
| Drive Performance rating - Percent | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形处理器性能
弧形 Arc 140T比 Arc 140V或比老化的 Iris Graphics 96 EU 快达 2 倍。 Iris Graphics 96 EUs.根据我们使用 GMK EVO-T1 的时间,将 BIOS 设置为性能模式可将图形性能提高 10%至 15%。
通过英特尔 AI Playground 和 Dreamshaper 8 在本地生成 5 幅图像,提示 "Goldfish",大约需要 49 秒。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11154 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36240 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7198 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3705 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 -1! | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
| X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| BOSGAME M2 | |
| GMK NucBox K12 | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra | |
赛博朋克 2077》超 FPS 图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 178.3 | 169.3 | 40.9 | 17.1 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 109.7 | 100.4 | 82.6 | 77.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 74.2 | 38.9 | 27.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 55.2 | 39.2 | 35.4 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 178.7 | 73.1 | 60.9 | 50.7 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 36.1 | 29.9 | 25.7 | 25.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 33.8 | 26.7 | 23.8 | 21.7 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 78.9 | 72.8 | 53.8 | 17.1 |
排放量
系统噪音
Noise level
| Idle |
| 27.9 / 27.9 / 30.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 31.3 / 32.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M | GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M | GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | BOSGAME M2 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M | Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -25% | -43% | -19% | -18% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 22.4 | 23 -3% | 23.5 -5% | 24.7 -10% | 23 -3% | 23.9 -7% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 27.9 | 29.1 -4% | 35.4 -27% | 38.7 -39% | 31.5 -13% | 28.2 -1% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 27.9 | 30.1 -8% | 35.4 -27% | 38.8 -39% | 32.3 -16% | 28.2 -1% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 30.2 | 31.7 -5% | 39 -29% | 38.9 -29% | 34.9 -16% | 32.5 -8% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 31.3 | 33.7 -8% | 42.4 -35% | 51.6 -65% | 39 -25% | 32 -2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 32.1 | 33.8 -5% | 40.4 -26% | 52 -62% | 40.3 -26% | 48.4 -51% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 32.5 | 35.2 -8% | 41.4 -27% | 51.6 -59% | 42.5 -31% | 50.9 -57% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 38.7 |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
| CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 55 |
| Prime95 压力 | 2.5 | -- | 68 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.3 | 850 | 68 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 1.0 | 1700 - 2350 | 63 |
发言人
集成式扬声器与集成式四麦克风配合使用,可进行语音操作。其他迷你电脑可能只配备一个麦克风或根本没有麦克风,而 Beelink 则同时配备了两个麦克风,使 Co-Pilot、ChatGPT、Alexa 和其他支持语音的软件更容易使用。
遗憾的是,扬声器的最高音量约为 75 dB(A),这对于卧室来说还算不错,但对于环境噪声较多的客厅或会议室来说就显得有些安静了。例如,我们的测试设备在接收我们对 Alexa 的语音命令时没有问题,但扬声器在播放时却缺乏震撼力。惠普 OmniBook 5 14 的扬声器 惠普 OmniBook 5 14相比之下,惠普 OmniBook 5 14 的扬声器最高音量接近 93 分贝(A)。
Beelink GTI15 Ultra audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 44% of all tested devices in this class were better, 16% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 25%, worst was 64%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
即使检查了后台活动或隐身程序,在桌面上空转时的功耗也异常高。甚至在睡眠模式下也会出现高耗电率,这表明 CPU 电源状态存在潜在错误。除此之外,在运行要求较高的负载时,CPU 功耗也会达到我们预期的水平。该系统比 AMD 驱动的 GMK NucBox K12的要求更低,同时性能稍快,每瓦性能更高。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, , , x, | Beelink SER9 Pro Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | GMK NucBox K12 Ryzen 7 H 255, Radeon 780M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | BOSGAME M2 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M, Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0, , x, | Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra i7-14700, GeForce RTX 4060, , , x, | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 34% | 21% | 28% | 27% | -127% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 18.8 | 7 63% | 9.9 47% | 6.1 68% | 6.4 66% | 26.5 -41% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 20.1 | 7.1 65% | 10.1 50% | 7.9 61% | 7.3 64% | 33.2 -65% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 40.1 | 7.5 81% | 13.1 67% | 13.2 67% | 7.5 81% | 33.9 15% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 66.2 | 62.3 6% | 69.8 -5% | 60.7 8% | 75 -13% | 127.6 -93% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 72.4 | 80.1 -11% | 86.3 -19% | 67.4 7% | 83 -15% | 291 -302% |
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 82.4 | 82.9 -1% | 92.8 -13% | 117.1 -42% | 99.9 -21% | 307.8 -274% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克/压力测试
外部显示器功耗
笔记本检查评级
改变!
非常简短的结论,最多 400 个字符
Beelink GTI15 Ultra
- 11/29/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
潜在竞争对手比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beelink GTI15 Ultra Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,229.00 List Price: 1200 USD | 1.3 kg | 55.8 mm | x | |
| Beelink SER9 Pro AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 520 USD | 812 g | 44.7 mm | x | |
| GMK NucBox K12 AMD Ryzen 7 H 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $749.99 | 938 g | 78 mm | x | |
| GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,299.99 List Price: 999€ | 946 g | 73.6 mm | x | |
| BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 600 USD | 819 g | 51 mm | x | |
| Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra Intel Core i7-14700 ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: 1. $779.00 Lenovo ThinKCentre neo 50q G... 2. $599.00 Lenovo ThinkCentre neo 50q G... 3. $649.99 Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo 30s G... List Price: 1600 USD | 3.5 kg | 108 mm | x |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.










































