结论:英特尔酷睿至尊 9 285H 提供高端动力
配备 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H 的华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 是一款功能强大的紧凑型迷你 PC。现代处理器可为多任务处理、图像和视频编辑以及生产性工作等要求苛刻的任务提供充足的性能。由于采用了明亮、高品质的外壳设计,该系统即使比传统的 NUC 型号稍大一些,也显得格外小巧。包括两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口在内的丰富连接选项是该迷你 PC 的一大亮点,它们使其面向未来。此外,底部几乎无需工具即可打开,可快速、轻松地升级内存和固态硬盘。
有人对负载下的噪音发展提出了批评,因为在不同的情况下,噪音明显可闻。如果能对风扇工作时的曲线进行更精细的调整,效果会更好,尤其是考虑到其价格。不过,这种行为可以通过广泛的 BIOS 设置进行部分优化。最后,华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 是为办公、多媒体和创意应用寻找一台小巧、功能强大的 PC 的最佳选择。
Pros
Cons
华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 在外观上明显有别于原有的 NUC 系列。尽管尺寸略有增大,但它仍然是一款非常紧凑、功能强大的迷你 PC。华硕在顶级配置中安装了英特尔酷睿至尊 9 285H,不过 Nuc 15 Pro+ 也有酷睿至尊 7 或酷睿至尊 5 处理器可供选择。
规格
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳与连接
从外观上看,华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 与 华硕 NUC 14 Pro+一样,华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 在外观上明显有别于之前的英特尔 NUC。与前代机型相比,华硕对 NUC 15 Pro+ 的外壳进行了全新设计。华硕在机身侧面和底部采用了金属材质,而顶部则由塑料制成。做工质量很高,手感也没什么可抱怨的。这款迷你电脑的占地面积约为 14.4 × 11.2 厘米,与一些竞争对手的机型相比需要更多的空间,但仍然足够小巧,适合放在任何桌面上。借助 VESA 支架,NUC 15 Pro+ 可以直接安装在显示器后面。
华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 提供了丰富的外部端口。总共有 7 个 USB 端口 - 4 个 USB-A 和 3 个 USB-C,其中两个 USB-C 端口支持 Thunderbolt 4,从而大大扩展了功能范围。此外,还有两个 HDMI 输出端口、一个 2.5 Gbit LAN 端口和快速 Wi-Fi。端口分布清晰实用。
| Connectivity - USB 3.x / USB4 / TB - AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (423 - 3906, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
维护
华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 还提供裸机版本,用户可以轻松升级。用户可以通过底部快速访问各个组件。在我们的测试中,已经安装了一个固态硬盘和两个 SO-DIMM 模块。该迷你 PC 还为第二个固态硬盘提供了空间,但必须遵守最大长度为 42 毫米的外形尺寸。
可持续性
华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 是一款紧凑型迷你 PC,与传统台式系统相比特别节能。它采用方便、节省空间的包装。外壳采用金属和塑料相结合的设计,坚固耐用。由于选用了环保材料,该设备将较长的使用寿命与现代的可持续设计相结合。生产商提供的三年质保使这款产品给人留下了良好的印象。
测试条件
所有基准测试均在出厂设置下进行。SoC 性能保持不变,与平衡模式下的出厂 BIOS 设置一致。非常丰富的 BIOS 选项是一个积极的特点。与 Geekom、Minisforum 或 Acemagic 的微型电脑相比,华硕在这里提供了更多的干预选项,包括有针对性地停用个别 USB 端口。
UEFI 设置
处理器
华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 采用了 英特尔酷睿9 285H,华硕并未人为限制其功率储备。因此,SoC 的运行功耗最高可达 115 瓦。在我们的测试中,该系统实现了非常高的性能,并以微弱优势领先于 GMK EVO-T1.不过,正如 Cinebench R15 多耐久测试的遥测数据所示,该系统芯片无法长期保持其全部性能。尽管如此,华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 仍能提供相对稳定的性能,而不会像 Geekom Mini IT15 那样出现明显的性能下降。
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance rating | |
| BOSGAME M5 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average of class Mini PC | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| BOSGAME M5 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (974 - 82725, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| BOSGAME M5 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (537 - 43587, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| BOSGAME M5 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (8069 - 94259, n=106, last 2 years) | |
系统性能
CPU 基准测试的出色表现在系统性能基准测试中也同样明显。速度高达 6,400 MT/s 的 DDR5 RAM 尤其有助于取得优异成绩,将对比设备甩在身后。集成 NPU 的 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 285H的集成 NPU 可高效处理人工智能任务,并从处理器的高性能释放中获益。
WebXPRT 4: Overall
WebXPRT 3: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (15933 - 163031, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Average of class Mini PC (14143 - 123769, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Average of class Mini PC (10630 - 216693, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Average of class Mini PC (82.3 - 184.8, n=106, last 2 years) | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
* ... smaller is better
NPU 电源
| UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer NPU | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| UL Procyon for Windows / Overall Score Integer GPU | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
* ... smaller is better
磁盘节流DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
图形卡和游戏性能
英特尔 Arc Graphics 140T 在华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 上运行,并在基准测试中取得了优异的成绩。与 Geekom Mini IT15 相比,该处理器的功耗限制较低,因此性能优势明显。不过,在专业应用中,iGPU 落后于当前的 AMD 解决方案。只要你愿意接受较低的图形细节,休闲游戏也是可行的。
| 3DMark Performance rating - Percent | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
SPECworkstation 4.0: Graphics Score | Accelerator Score | Viewport Graphics | HandBrake | ONNX Inference
| Performance rating | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Graphics Score | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Accelerator Score | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / Viewport Graphics | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / HandBrake | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| SPECworkstation 4.0 / ONNX Inference | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (n=1) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+, Intel Arc Graphics 140T Ultra 9 285H | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro, AMD Radeon 780M R9 8945HS | Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255, AMD Radeon 780M Ryzen 7 255 | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T Ultra 9 285H | GMK EVO-T1, Intel Arc Graphics 140T Ultra 9 285H | Asus NUC 14 Pro+, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU Ultra 9 185H | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 247% | 207% | 193% | 9% | -4% | -16% | 244% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps) | 6.59 | 26.1 296% | 13.3 102% | 12.6 91% | 7.08 7% | 7.02 7% | 6.99 6% | 18.7 ? 184% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps) | 6.61 | 18 172% | 19.7 198% | 19.1 189% | 7.94 20% | 7.4 12% | 4.94 -25% | 28.9 ? 337% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps) | 21.7 | 36.2 67% | 34.9 61% | 33.7 55% | 26.7 23% | 19.9 -8% | 18.9 -13% | 43.9 ? 102% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps) | 15.2 | 26 71% | 24.2 59% | 24.6 62% | 14.6 -4% | 12.8 -16% | 11.2 -26% | 29.9 ? 97% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps) | 18.4 | 25.2 37% | 21.3 16% | 21.5 17% | 17.8 -3% | 14.6 -21% | 14.8 -20% | 42.4 ? 130% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps) | 6.07 | 70.6 1063% | 67 1004% | 63.1 940% | 6.81 12% | 6.13 1% | 5.37 -12% | 50.1 ? 725% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps) | 47.5 | 59.3 25% | 51.2 8% | 47.5 0% | 51.3 8% | 44.9 -5% | 37.2 -22% | 110.4 ? 132% |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 54772 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 47698 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 56447 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 13649 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 195495 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 41407 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8146 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 3801 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4390 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 838 points | |
Help | ||
| GTA V | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Settings possible | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| 1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
FPS 图表 - 30 分钟赛博朋克 2077 1920 x 1080 超预设(FSR 关闭)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 176.4 | 168.9 | 45.3 | 18.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 180 | 112.9 | 58.4 | 32.2 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 107.9 | 94.5 | 87.6 | 92.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 77.9 | 43.6 | 30.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 71.4 | 55.7 | 48.3 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 198.3 | 79.4 | 67 | 56.2 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.5 | 31.2 | 26.2 | 26 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 40.5 | 33.7 | 29 | 25.6 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 83 | 74.9 | 57.7 | 19.2 |
使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 通过雷电 4 对华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 进行性能测试
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 3DMark | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Unigine Superposition | |
| 1280x720 720p Low | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p High | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 1080p Extreme | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 4k Optimized | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 7680x4320 8k Optimized | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Unigine Valley 1.0 | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD DirectX AA:x8 | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| 1920x1080 Extreme HD Preset OpenGL AA:x8 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 | |
| Extreme Preset OpenGL | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| ComputeMark v2.1 | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Score | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 3DTex | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Fluid 2DTexArr | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Vector | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, Mandel Scalar | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 1024x600 Normal, QJuliaRayTrace | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:SM | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| F1 24 | |
| 1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 3840x2160 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| 2560x1440 High Quality | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
| 3840x2160 High Quality | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | |
| Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | |
Ultra 9 285H | Asus NUC 15 Pro+ (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @TB4) | Sapphire Edge AI, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @USB4) Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 (Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 @OCuLink) | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 590% | 746% | 866% | 244% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) (fps) | 6.59 | 41.4 528% | 41.5 530% | 43 553% | 18.7 ? 184% |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) (fps) | 6.61 | 67.2 917% | 136 1957% | 139 2003% | 28.9 ? 337% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) (fps) | 21.7 | 99 356% | 111 412% | 117 439% | 43.9 ? 102% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) (fps) | 15.2 | 79.9 426% | 84.6 457% | 85.1 460% | 29.9 ? 97% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) (fps) | 18.4 | 158 759% | 145 688% | 209 1036% | 42.4 ? 130% |
| 3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04) (fps) | 6.07 | 31.4 417% | 33.5 452% | 38.2 529% | 50.1 ? 725% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) (fps) | 47.5 | 394 729% | 392 725% | 542 1041% | 110.4 ? 132% |
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 439 | 338 | 282 | 148.8 | 139 | 180.9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 186.9 | 170.9 | 169.6 | 152.4 | 144 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 223 | 213 | 167.8 | 153.6 | 109.4 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 104 | 103.1 | 93.1 | 80.9 | ||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 203 | 169.4 | 153 | 152.3 | 133.2 | 95.3 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 109.6 | 110.2 | 100 | 94.5 | 84.2 | 53.4 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 118.3 | 116.8 | 111.9 | 72.7 | 68 | 52.1 |
排放量
系统噪音
华硕 NUC 15 Pro+ 在底部使用风扇进行主动散热。在持续负载的情况下,散热系统很快就会达到极限,风扇的声音也会清晰可闻。设备在负载情况下的平均噪音约为 44 dB(A),峰值约为 53 dB(A),声音清晰可闻。Mini PC 在闲置时保持安静,但风扇仍在继续运转。
Noise level
| Idle |
| 25.4 / 25.5 / 37.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 44.4 / 52.7 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 Ryzen 7 255, Radeon 780M | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 2% | 15% | 7% | -8% | -14% | 2% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 25.3 | 24.8 2% | 23.7 6% | 24.9 2% | 24.3 4% | 24.7 2% | 24.6 3% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 25.4 | 25.4 -0% | 27.2 -7% | 31.1 -22% | 33.7 -33% | 38.7 -52% | 24.7 3% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 25.5 | 25.4 -0% | 27.3 -7% | 31.2 -22% | 33.7 -32% | 38.8 -52% | 29.6 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 37.3 | 25.5 32% | 27.3 27% | 31.2 16% | 33.8 9% | 38.9 -4% | 29.8 20% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 44.4 | 49.8 -12% | 33.6 24% | 36.7 17% | 47.6 -7% | 51.6 -16% | 45.7 -3% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * (dB) | 47.7 | 49.7 -4% | 37.9 21% | 38.7 19% | |||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 46.2 | 49.6 -7% | 34.4 26% | 37.8 18% | 47.7 -3% | 52 -13% | 47.7 -3% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 52.7 | 49.8 6% | 34.4 35% | 38.4 27% | 47.9 9% | 51.6 2% | 47.4 10% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.6 to 69.5 °C for the class Mini PC.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 36.4 °C / 98 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.7 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 32.5 °C / 91 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.5 °C / 91 F for the class Mini PC.
能源管理
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M | Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro R9 8945HS, Radeon 780M | Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 Ryzen 7 255, Radeon 780M | Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | GMK EVO-T1 Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core | Average Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Average of class Mini PC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 5% | -50% | -2% | 15% | -22% | -19% | -26% | -57% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 3.9 | 2.4 38% | 9.8 -151% | 4.4 -13% | 3.8 3% | 6.1 -56% | 4.2 -8% | 6.48 ? -66% | 9.13 ? -134% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 6.1 | 4.6 25% | 10.5 -72% | 5.9 3% | 5.2 15% | 7.9 -30% | 7.2 -18% | 9.22 ? -51% | 11.3 ? -85% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 8.2 | 9.2 -12% | 13.6 -66% | 6.9 16% | 8.4 -2% | 13.2 -61% | 13 -59% | 12.9 ? -57% | 15 ? -83% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 56.1 | 78.4 -40% | 67 -19% | 70.4 -25% | 50.1 11% | 60.7 -8% | 68.5 -22% | 56.7 ? -1% | 64.3 ? -15% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 63.9 | 77.8 -22% | 85.9 -34% | 85.8 -34% | 51.6 19% | 67.4 -5% | 74.1 -16% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 160.6 | 95.1 41% | 96.2 40% | 97.4 39% | 91.9 43% | 117.1 27% | 144.9 10% | 86.2 ? 46% | 109 ? 32% |
* ... smaller is better
功率效率
| Performance rating - Percent | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Power Consumption | |
| Cinebench R23 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Cinebench R23 Single Power Efficiency - external Monitor | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Cinebench R15 Multi Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Efficiency | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H | |
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ | |
| GMK EVO-T1 | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 | |
耗电量 - 外部监视器
耗电量 - 外部监视器
笔记本检查评级
Asus NUC 15 Pro+
- 12/09/2025 v8
Sebastian Bade
可比较的替代品
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Dimensions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus NUC 15 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,160.99 List Price: 991€ | 690 g | 112 x 144 x 42 mm | |
| Geekom A9 Max, AI 9 HX 370 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,099.00 List Price: 999€ | 709 g | 132 x 135 x 46.9 mm | |
| Minisforum EliteMini UM890 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $687.00 MINISFORUM UM890 Pro Mini PC... 2. $789.00 MINISFORUM UM890 Pro Mini PC... 3. $791.90 MINISFORUM UM890 Pro Mini PC... List Price: 739 EUR | 709 g | 127 x 130 x 60.6 mm | |
| Minisforum AI X1, Ryzen 7 255 AMD Ryzen 7 255 ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $559.00 List Price: 579€ | 658 g | 126 x 128 x 52 mm | |
| Geekom Mini IT15, Ultra 9 285H Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,199.00 List Price: 1099€ | 595 g | 112 x 117 x 49.2 mm | |
| GMK EVO-T1 Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $949.99 List Price: 999€ | 946 g | 151 x 154 x 73.6 mm | |
| Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $995.79 ASUS NUC 14 Pro Tall Full Sy... 2. $909.99 ASUS NUC 14 Pro AI Mini PC, ... 3. $332.92 ASUS NUC 14 Pro Tall Barebon... List Price: 1250 EUR | 622 g | 112 x 144 x 41 mm |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

































































