结论——华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2026 实现了显著提升
2026款华硕ROG Zephyrus G16有了显著提升。 240 Hz OLED 面板的亮度远超以往,这对 HDR 游戏来说是个好消息;英特尔 Panther Lake 处理器效率更高,从而延长了电池续航时间;此外,尽管未搭载新款显卡,但 GPU 的运行功耗较之前有所提升,这进一步提升了游戏性能。 Zephyrus G16 一如既往地保留了诸多标志性优势,包括出色的键盘、坚固的铝合金机身(配备了改进的铰链)以及卓越的音响系统。
内存仍采用焊接式设计,64 GB 的配置价格也极其昂贵,超过 5,000 美元。 这意味着搭载RTX 5080并具备前述改进的2026款机型,比搭载RTX 5090的旧款2025机型还要昂贵。尽管所有笔记本电脑的价格都在上涨,但这仍然让人难以接受。
Pros
Cons
价格与供货情况
您可以在百思买以 3389 美元的价格购买搭载 GeForce RTX 5080 显卡、32 GB 内存和 2 TB SSD 存储的 2026 款华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16。
规格
机箱、连接性和输入设备
机身设计本身并未改变,华硕 ROG Zephyrus G16 2026 依然是一款采用极为坚固铝制机身的高端游戏/多媒体笔记本电脑。我们未能发现任何缺陷,华硕还略微提升了铰链的稳定性,因此仅存在轻微晃动。 机身有黑色和白色可选,即便是我们这台黑色评测机,指纹残留也不算太明显。可维护部件仍仅限于 M.2-2280 SSD、Wi-Fi 模块以及风扇清洁,但内存条依然是焊接式的。 RGB背光键盘的键程仍为1.7毫米,再次跻身笔记本电脑中最舒适的键盘之列。大尺寸触控板的表现非常出色,机械按键的点击声也十分轻柔。 该机型搭载了 Wi-Fi 7 模块(尽管工作频率为 320 MHz,但传输速率仍受限于约 2.5 Gbps),而 1080p 网络摄像头拍摄效果尚可。 SD卡读卡器(UHS-II)最高传输速率可达218 MB/s,但不支持SD-Express标准。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 210, n=50, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.5 - 261, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
| Networking | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |

显示屏 - 更明亮的 240 Hz OLED
上一代 Zephyrus G16 虽然已采用三星一款非常出色的 240 Hz OLED 面板,但亮度有所限制,尤其在 HDR 内容方面。华硕现已解决这一问题,改用三星更亮的面板。 其规格仍与那款2.8K镜面面板和240 Hz刷新率相当,但SDR亮度现已达到约500尼特,我们测得峰值亮度高达1138尼特(纯白画面时约为700尼特),这对HDR游戏体验而言是一项重大提升。 整体画质极佳,得益于快速的响应时间以及高刷新率,这块面板非常适合游戏。 PWM闪烁频率也已提升至1.44 kHz,对大多数用户而言应该不会构成问题。正如我们使用专业设备进行的分析所示,华硕再次提供了非常精准的sRGB以及P3色域色彩配置文件,即使通过我们自己的校准,也无法进一步提升其色彩准确度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 512 cd/m²
Contrast: 51200:1 (Black: 0.01 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.5 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.7}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.95}
84.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
91.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
CCT: 6589 K
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW ATNA60HU06-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Samsung ATNA60HU06-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Samsung ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Aorus Master 16 AM6J Samsung ATNA60HU02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Samsung 160HU05, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H ATNA60HS01-0 (Samsung SDC420A), OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 165 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 7% | -7% | 4% | 8% | 8% | |
| APL18 Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 609 | |||||
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1138 | 609 -46% | ||||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 91.7 | 99.7 9% | 96.5 5% | 95.9 5% | 99.6 9% | 99.9 9% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 97.5 | 100 3% | 99.2 2% | 100 3% | 100 3% | 100 3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 84.8 | 93.5 10% | 94.5 11% | 88.2 4% | 95.6 13% | 94.1 11% |
| Response Times | 9% | -834% | 30% | 8% | -204% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 0.81 ? | 0.28 ? 65% | 0.32 ? 60% | 0.371 ? 54% | 0.29 ? 64% | 2 ? -147% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.22 ? | 0.4 ? -82% | 6 ? -2627% | 0.206 ? 6% | 0.41 ? -86% | 1.4 ? -536% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 1440 ? | 1441 | 960 | 1158 ? | 1440 ? | 1300 |
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 56 | 32 43% | 20 64% | 40 29% | 30 46% | 16.7 70% |
| Screen | -20% | -14% | -77% | 15% | -25% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 512 | 462.2 -10% | 394 -23% | 468 -9% | 383.3 -25% | 518 1% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 515 | 465 -10% | 398 -23% | 467 -9% | 387 -25% | 522 1% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 97 -1% | 98 0% | 96 -2% | 97 -1% | 97 -1% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.0084 16% | 0.03 -200% | |||
| Contrast (:1) | 51200 | 46905 -8% | 15600 -70% | |||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 3.03 -102% | 2.41 -61% | 4 -167% | 0.87 42% | 2.49 -66% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.4 | 5.84 -72% | 3.82 -12% | 6.59 -94% | 2.23 34% | 5.25 -54% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 0.6 74% | 2.4 -4% | 3.8 -65% | 0.8 65% | 3.02 -31% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.597 85% | 2.19 100% | 2.37 93% |
| CCT | 6589 99% | 6452 101% | 6544 99% | 6626 98% | 6395 102% | 6426 101% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 1.41 | 0.61 | 2.15 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
-6% | -285% /
-176% | -14% /
-37% | 10% /
12% | -74% /
-62% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.12 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.7 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.11 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.13 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (30.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1440 Hz Amplitude: 56 % | ≤ 95 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1440 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 95 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1440 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7665 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能——Panther Lake 及 64 GB 内存
测试条件
华硕提供了常规的性能配置文件,我们在基准测试和测量中使用了“Turbo”模式。此外还有一个手动模式,在该模式下,RTX 5080 的 TGP 可提升至 160 瓦(135 瓦 + 25 瓦动态增强)。
| 能耗概况 | TDP | Cinebench 2024 多核 | TGP | 《Time Spy》图表 | CP2077 QHD Ultra | 风扇最大噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whisper | 60/55 W | 1198分 | 80 W | 12302 分 | 52.1 fps | 42.6 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 70/60 W | 1231分 | 115 W | 17349分 | 77 fps | 50.1 dB(A) |
| Turbo | 70 W | 1271分 | 135 W | 18703 分 | 83.4 fps | 54.8 dB(A) |
| 电池(性能) | 65/60 W | 1235 分 | 55 W | 9569分 | 46.2 fps | 42.6 dB(A) |
处理器性能
在我们的 CPU 基准测试中,新款英特尔酷睿 Ultra 9 386H(Panther Lake)比旧款酷睿 Ultra 9 285H 快约 20%,其整体性能表现良好且非常稳定,但搭载 HX 处理器的高端游戏笔记本电脑在多核性能方面仍具有显著优势。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H -2! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW -2! | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (486 - 2327, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (873 - 1271, n=9) | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average of class Gaming (95 - 141, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (118.1 - 126.8, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (10488 - 42661, n=102, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (12144 - 21834, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2010 - 2123, n=9) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1601 - 2415, n=102, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (4029 - 16433, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4757 - 8444, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (762 - 805, n=9) | |
| Average of class Gaming (622 - 913, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (1578 - 6330, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2197 - 3347, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average of class Gaming (188.8 - 350, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (249 - 318, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (156 - 299, n=9) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average of class Gaming (79 - 330, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (33491 - 148086, n=99, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (44980 - 72882, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Average of class Gaming (4824 - 7436, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5488 - 6493, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average of class Gaming (6625 - 22850, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (13776 - 17405, n=11) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average of class Gaming (1982 - 3259, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2778 - 2947, n=11) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (11.5 - 44.4, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (13.2 - 25.8, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 88.8, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (38.5 - 56.1, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (0.4055 - 0.4384, n=9) | |
| Average of class Gaming (0.3439 - 0.59, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J -1! | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H -1! | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus -1! | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW -1! | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (10227 - 85542, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (10001 - 21921, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (51376 - 372155, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (53370 - 113595, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2180 - 10115, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2776 - 5604, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (49785 - 173351, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (4424 - 33636, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5314 - 7333, n=9) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25115 - 196829, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (28414 - 61578, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (39258 - 247074, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (46362 - 72112, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (574 - 2531, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (669 - 1271, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5509 - 45446, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5138 - 11672, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (54042 - 89891, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW (v6.92.6600) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Gaming (12271 - 89891, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J (v8.20.8100) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Gaming (2930 - 20751, n=19, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW (v8.20.8100) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4051 - 4858, n=8) | |
系统与存储设备
系统性能卓越,ROG Zephyrus G16 的响应速度非常快。当独立显卡(dGPU)被激活时可能会出现轻微延迟,但这对于采用 Advanced Optimus 显卡切换技术的系统而言完全正常。 G16 配备两个 SSD 插槽(M.2-2280),但其速度仅支持 PCIe 4.0 标准。我们评测机型中搭载的三星 2 TB 固态硬盘(可用空间 1.74 TB)传输速率良好,在持续负载下未出现性能降频现象。 我们的标准化延迟测试未发现任何问题。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | |
| Average of class Gaming | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (5828 - 12414, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (8810 - 11935, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average of class Gaming (6845 - 25323, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (7602 - 19954, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (1366 - 2409, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average of class Gaming (1386 - 2254, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (1343 - 2786, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Average of class Gaming (1241 - 2334, n=93, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average of class Gaming (220 - 532, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (n=1) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Average of class Gaming (165 - 354, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Average of class Gaming (391 - 590, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (442 - 457, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 9827 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75437 - 129946, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (21750 - 129946, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (81021 - 118858, n=9) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Average of class Gaming (22956 - 118858, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75959 - 135096, n=9) | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average of class Gaming (22297 - 135096, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Average of class Gaming (75.3 - 151.7, n=100, last 2 years) | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (87.2 - 116.9, n=9) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Average of class Gaming (366 - 11799, n=92, last 2 years) | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU 与游戏性能
华硕将 GeForce RTX 5080(或 RTX 5090)的最大 TGP 从 120 瓦提升至 135 瓦,与前代产品相比,游戏性能提升了约 20%。 不过,它的性能仍略逊于其主要竞争对手——同样搭载 Core Ultra 9 386H 处理器和 160W 版 RTX 5080 的 Razer Blade 16。 总体而言,配备 16 GB 显存的 RTX 5080 同样能够胜任高负载游戏,仅在运行极具挑战性的光线追踪游戏时,才需要启用 DLSS 画质增强或帧生成技术,以确保流畅的游戏体验。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 24951 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 34961 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 17840 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 4484 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 19417 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
| Average of class Gaming (9 - 32, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (11 - 17, n=16) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
| Average of class Gaming (15 - 228, n=101, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (18 - 49, n=18) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Average of class Gaming (122 - 565, n=97, last 2 years) | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (123 - 248, n=17) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J | |
* ... smaller is better
| F1 25 - 2560x1440 Ultra Max Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop (23.3 - 30.8, n=6) | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW | |
| Average of class Gaming (5 - 39.1, n=27, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H | |
《赛博朋克2077》极致画质帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 141.8 | 138.9 | ||||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 175.7 | 161 | 154 | 146.4 | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 213 | 195.4 | 153.9 | 125.6 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 139.2 | 124.5 | 101.9 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 446 | 337 | 301 | 300 | 242 | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 203 | 175.9 | 158.2 | 154.7 | 117.4 | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 142.8 | 133.6 | 125 | 114.2 | 83.4 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 237 | 231 | 107 | 108.9 | 70.6 | |
| F1 25 (2025) | 218 | 209 | 182.2 | 40.4 | 46.8 | 25.2 |
排放与功耗
系统噪声
Noise level
| Idle |
| 32.8 / 32.8 / 32.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 42.6 / 54.8 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 10% | -0% | -5% | 14% | 3% | |
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.4 | 23.1 5% | 25.56 -5% | 25 -2% | 23.1 5% | 24 2% |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 32.8 | 23.4 29% | 30 9% | 28 15% | 23.2 29% | 24 27% |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 32.8 | 25.4 23% | 30 9% | 29 12% | 28.2 14% | 24 27% |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 32.8 | 29.3 11% | 30 9% | 35 -7% | 28.3 14% | 30.9 6% |
| Load Average * (dB) | 42.6 | 42.6 -0% | 53.55 -26% | 58 -36% | 28.8 32% | 55.9 -31% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 54.8 | 53.6 2% | 53.5 2% | 59 -8% | 49 11% | 56.72 -4% |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 54.8 | 53.7 2% | 54.02 1% | 60 -9% | 57.1 -4% | 56.72 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.9 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.4 °C / 93.9 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.6 °C / -10.1 F).
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Ultra 9 386H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Aorus Master 16 AM6J R9 9955HX3D, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Ultra 9 290HX Plus, GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | -10% | -11% | 9% | -13% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 46.3 | 45.6 2% | 49.2 -6% | 50 -8% | 45.2 2% | 48 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 45.9 | 47 -2% | 50.2 -9% | 52 -13% | 37.4 19% | 50 -9% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 32.1 | 35.2 -10% | 37.2 -16% | 31.6 2% | 38 -18% | |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 34.5 | 37.6 -9% | 37.4 -8% | 30.2 12% | 42 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
音响系统再次表现出色,但其直接竞争对手Blade 16的水平也与其不相上下。
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Aorus Master 16 AM6J audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 63% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 136%
功耗与电池续航时间
功耗测试结果并未出现意外,由于功耗在190-195瓦左右趋于稳定,因此250W电源适配器已足够使用。90Wh电池容量保持不变,但得益于升级的屏幕和更高效的Panther Lake处理器,电池续航时间比之前有所提升。 在150尼特的亮度下,我们的Wi-Fi测试持续时间接近12.5小时(比之前延长了38%),因此也超越了搭载Panther Lake处理器的Blade 16。在最高SDR亮度下(该亮度高于之前),测试结果也略优于之前,接近7.5小时。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
外接显示器的功耗
Notebookcheck 评分
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW
- 09/07/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU606AW Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 5400€ | 1.9 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Razer Blade 16 Core Ultra 9 386H Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $3,149.99 Razer Blade 16 (2026) Gaming... 2. $3,999.99 Razer Blade 16 (2026) Gaming... 3. $5,319.99 Razer Blade 16 (2026) Gaming... List Price: 4900 USD | 2.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 3800€ | 2 kg | 14.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Aorus Master 16 AM6J AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX3D ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,899.99 GIGABYTE - AORUS Master 16 G... 2. $3,499.99 GIGABYTE - AORUS Master 16 G... 3. $2,789.82 GIGABYTE - AORUS MASTER 16 G... | 2.3 kg | 24.5 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Alienware 16 Area-51 Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, SSD | Amazon: List Price: 4000 USD | 3.3 kg | 28.5 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16IAX10H Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,999.00 Lenovo Legion Pro 5i Gen 10 ... 2. $94.98 Lenovo Slim 245W AC Adapter ... 3. $2,069.00 Lenovo Legion 5 Pro Gaming A... List Price: 2500 Euro | 2.4 kg | 25.95 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.





























































