结论——Zenbook S14 2026 既有优势,也有不足
华硕 ZenBook S14 的 2026 年更新版颇具看点,但并非所有改动都令人满意。它依然是一款设计出众、轻薄时尚的 14 英寸笔记本电脑,具备出色的连接性、舒适的输入设备以及卓越的音响系统。 相比旧款Lunar Lake芯片,新款Panther Lake处理器的采用使CPU性能几乎翻倍,电池续航时间也略有延长,但图形性能实际上却略有下降。 这令人失望,我们原本期待像 Zenbook S14 这样的高端机型能搭载配备快速 Arc B390 显卡的最新 Core Ultra X 处理器,但实际仅配备了搭载低速集成显卡的 Core Ultra 386H。
新款Panther Lake芯片的功耗上限也更高,整体风扇噪音比以前大得多。没错,“静音模式”始终保持着令人愉悦的安静,但当使用全CPU性能时,近50 dB(A)的噪音确实相当大。 另一个问题在于新的OLED屏幕。它现在亮度大幅提升(尤其在HDR模式下),仍能提供120 Hz刷新率和非常准确的色彩,但由于触摸屏层的存在,在明亮的表面上图像会显得有些颗粒感。 这是触控屏OLED面板的常见问题,但部分厂商的产品并未出现这一问题(包括三星自家的设备,尽管华硕同样采用三星的面板)。焊接式内存也是一个问题,尽管32 GB内存对大多数用户来说应该已经足够。
考虑到当前笔记本电脑及配备32 GB内存和1 TB SSD的机型价格普遍上涨,新款Zenbook S14的1899美元官方定价,相对于其配置及与竞品的对比来看,其实相当合理。 如果你不在意显卡性能,新款 Zenbook S14 或许是你的理想之选;但如果你想要目前最强的 Panther Lake 集成显卡,那就只能选择竞争对手的产品了。
Pros
Cons
规格
机身、连接性与输入设备
华硕对新款 Zenbook S14 的设计进行了微调:旧款机型的机盖上曾印有醒目的 ProArt 标志,且表面纹理略有不同;而新款机型的机盖则采用了小巧的 Zenbook 标志,且颜色与机身底座完全一致。 采用陶瓷铝合金材质的机身做工依然出色,Zenbook S14 依然是一款非常纤薄轻巧(1.2 公斤)的设备,轻松放入任何包中。 尽管电池容量有所增加,但内部布局与之前基本相同,用户可以更换 M.2-2280 固态硬盘,但内存和 Wi-Fi 模块均为焊接式。
接口配置保持不变,包括两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口、一个标准 USB-A 端口以及 HDMI 接口。英特尔的 Wi-Fi 7 模块在搭配相应路由器时,可实现超过 4 Gbps 的出色传输速率,而 1080p 网络摄像头的画质在光线充足的条件下依然不错。
我们依然很喜欢这些输入设备。虽然键程仅为1.1毫米,但按键反馈依然非常清脆,整体打字体验十分舒适。机械式触控板依然表现出色,尽管机械点击声略显响亮。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
| Networking | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| iperf3 transmit Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| iperf3 receive Wi-Fi6/7 RT-BE96U | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |

显示
华硕升级了OLED触摸屏。它依然保持2.8K分辨率和120 Hz刷新率,但亮度现在比以前高得多。 虽然SDR模式下的最大亮度从370尼特提升至450尼特,HDR模式下的最大亮度则从615尼特提升至1,050尼特。黑场表现和对比度均十分出色,响应时间同样令人满意。 整体画质非常出色,但在显示高亮画面时,受触控层影响,画面可能会略显颗粒感。我们还检测到960 Hz的PWM闪烁现象。亮度和色温均可通过传感器进行调节。
华硕提供了多种色彩配置文件,我们使用专业级CalMAN软件进行校准后发现,其色彩和灰度表现非常精准,因此开箱即用即可轻松进行图像编辑。sRGB和P3色域均得到完全覆盖。即使通过我们自己的校准,也无法进一步提升色彩准确度。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 454 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.72}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.8 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
86.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)
98.3% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
CCT: 6550 K
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA ATNA40HQ05-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA ATNA40CT06-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 ATNA40CU09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Samsung SDC4215, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 EDO14.55, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6", 120 Hz | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 LG Philips 140WUX, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 120 Hz | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | 1% | 3% | 4% | 1% | -1% | -21% | -0% | |
| HDR Peak Brightness (cd/m²) | 1050 | ||||||||
| Display P3 Coverage (%) | 98.3 | 99.5 1% | 99 1% | 99.9 2% | 99.9 2% | 99.3 1% | 96.3 -2% | 64 -35% | 98.1 0% |
| sRGB Coverage (%) | 99.9 | 98.8 -1% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 95.3 -5% | 98.6 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%) | 86.7 | 88.9 3% | 89.2 3% | 92.3 6% | 95.7 10% | 87.7 1% | 85 -2% | 66.2 -24% | 86.8 0% |
| Response Times | -12% | 22% | 15% | -12% | -11% | 49% | -5003% | -1895% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms) | 2 ? | 1.22 ? 39% | 0.7 ? 65% | 0.58 ? 71% | 0.83 ? 58% | 0.64 ? 68% | 0.55 ? 72% | 57.7 ? -2785% | 24.3 ? -1115% |
| Response Time Black / White * (ms) | 0.53 ? | 1.26 ? -138% | 0.71 ? -34% | 0.87 ? -64% | 0.69 ? -30% | 0.94 ? -77% | 0.51 ? 4% | 38.8 ? -7221% | 14.7 ? -2674% |
| PWM Frequency (Hz) | 960 ? | 480 ? | 480 ? | 927.13 ? | 240 ? | 479.46 ? | 120 ? | ||
| PWM Amplitude * (%) | 40 | 15 62% | 26 35% | 25 37% | 66 -65% | 50 -25% | 11 72% | ||
| Screen | -11% | 3% | -23% | -32% | -24% | 4% | -33% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle (cd/m²) | 458 | 404 -12% | 374 -18% | 446 -3% | 400 -13% | 470.7 3% | 519 13% | 561.2 23% | 546 19% |
| Brightness (cd/m²) | 457 | 408 -11% | 379 -17% | 447 -2% | 402 -12% | 488 7% | 526 15% | 505 11% | 519 14% |
| Brightness Distribution (%) | 98 | 98 0% | 98 0% | 99 1% | 99 1% | 94 -4% | 89 -9% | 85 -13% | 90 -8% |
| Black Level * (cd/m²) | 0.01 | 0.22 | 0.38 | ||||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1 | 1.1 -10% | 1 -0% | 1.76 -76% | 2.1 -110% | 2.21 -121% | 1.1 -10% | 2.09 -109% | 2.1 -110% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.6 | 3.3 -27% | 2.2 15% | 3.29 -27% | 3.3 -27% | 5.02 -93% | 2.2 15% | 4.37 -68% | 4 -54% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 1.9 -6% | 1.1 39% | 2.3 -28% | 2.3 -28% | 0.6 67% | 1.8 -0% | 2.5 -39% | 3.3 -83% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.17 101% | 2.15 102% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.19 100% | 2.22 99% |
| CCT | 6550 99% | 6547 99% | 6549 99% | 6470 100% | 6795 96% | 6472 100% | 6496 100% | 6760 96% | 7127 91% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.18 | 1.6 | 0.82 | 0.7 | 1.09 | 0.9 | |||
| Contrast (:1) | 51900 | 2551 | 1437 | ||||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -7% /
-8% | 9% /
7% | -2% /
-7% | -13% /
-18% | -11% /
-14% | 17% /
14% | -1686% /
-933% | -644% /
-365% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.28 ms rise | |
| ↘ 0.25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.8 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
| ↘ 1 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 40 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
表现
华硕已转用英特尔的Panther Lake处理器,但目前尚无搭载Core Ultra X系统级芯片和Arc B390集成显卡的机型。
测试条件
华硕提供了典型的电源方案,这些方案也会与 Windows 设置同步。对于日常轻度使用,我们推荐“静音模式”,这样风扇在大多数时间都会处于停转状态。我们在进行基准测试和测量时使用了“性能模式”。
| 简介 | TDP | CB2024 Multi | Time Spy Graphics | 风扇最大噪音 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whisper | 35/12 瓦 | 476 分 | 1,991 分 | 29 dB(A) |
| 标准 | 57/17 瓦 | 666 分 | 2,745 分 | 38.5 dB(A) |
| 性能 | 57/28 瓦 | 969 分 | 3,048 分 | 49.1 dB(A) |
| 电池 | 57/28 瓦 | 936 分 | 2,998 分 | 49.1 dB(A) |
处理器性能
华硕采用了全新的英特尔酷睿Ultra 9 386H(Panther Lake)处理器,该处理器拥有4个性能核心和共计12个能效核心。该CPU的功耗最高可达57瓦,但在持续负载下会迅速稳定在28瓦。 与旧款Lunar Lake机型相比,其单核性能略有提升,但主要优势在于多核性能,后者基本上翻了一番。 对于一款日常使用的笔记本电脑而言,这些成绩表现不错,但也算不上特别突出——毕竟它仅比AMD的Zen 5芯片略胜一筹,整体表现仍逊于苹果的无风扇M5 SoC,而且在Zenbook A14中,它很容易就被高通骁龙X2 Elite超越。
Cinebench R15 多核循环测试
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.7: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 -14! | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA -3! | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (873 - 1271, n=8) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1471, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (118.1 - 126.8, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 200, n=55, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (12144 - 21186, n=8) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2010 - 2101, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2213, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4757 - 8405, n=8) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (762 - 796, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 832, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2197 - 3347, n=8) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (249 - 314, n=8) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (156 - 299, n=8) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (44980 - 72882, n=8) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5488 - 6493, n=8) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6699, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (13776 - 17405, n=10) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 20325, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Geekbench 6.7 / Single-Core | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2778 - 2919, n=10) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 4195, n=62, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (13098 - 17557, n=8) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (1992 - 2162, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2224, n=48, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (13.2 - 25.1, n=8) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=57, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (39.9 - 220, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (38.5 - 56.1, n=8) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (0.4024 - 1.456, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (0.4055 - 0.4384, n=8) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx | CPU CheckMate
| Performance rating | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H -1! | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 -1! | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA -1! | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 -1! | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA -1! | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 -1! | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA -1! | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 -1! | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (10001 - 21727, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (53370 - 113595, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (2776 - 5604, n=8) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 95002, n=49, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5314 - 7332, n=8) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (28414 - 61578, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (46362 - 72112, n=8) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 96917, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (669 - 1271, n=8) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (5138 - 11627, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (54042 - 89891, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 (v6.92.6600) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA (v6.92.6600) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 85600, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU CheckMate | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (4051 - 4858, n=7) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA (v8.20.8100) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (756 - 5939, n=8, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 (v8.20.8100) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA (v8.20.8100) | |
系统与存储设备
系统性能非常出色,Zenbook S14 运行极为流畅,我们未遇到任何稳定性问题。三星的 PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘(1 TB,可用空间 865 GB)提供了高速且稳定的传输速率。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance rating | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 -4! | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA -4! | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (7679 - 8639, n=3) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (4920 - 9939, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (10375 - 10934, n=3) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (8552 - 11646, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (12295 - 15282, n=3) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 16606, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (9175 - 10562, n=3) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (5722 - 13779, n=45, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1975 - 2143, n=3) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2356, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1842 - 1955, n=3) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 2277, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (2169 - 2477, n=3) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2743, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (1667 - 1831, n=3) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1854, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 530, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (302 - 323, n=3) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (282 - 309, n=3) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 378, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (234 - 1104, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (447 - 456, n=3) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 8639 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75437 - 129946, n=8) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 131023, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (81021 - 118858, n=8) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (75959 - 135096, n=8) | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 135141, n=58, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 9 386H (87.2 - 116.9, n=8) | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (6.1 - 159.9, n=56, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
* ... smaller is better
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (316 - 8148, n=40, last 2 years) | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
磁盘限速:DiskSpd 读取循环,队列深度 8
GPU与游戏性能
Core Ultra 9 386H 仅配备了拥有 4 个 Xe 核心的英特尔集成显卡(iGPU),其性能远低于高端的 Arc B390 或 B370 集成显卡。 实际上,它的性能甚至不如前代 Zenbook S14 上搭载的旧款 Lunar Lake Arc Graphics 140V,这意味着在现代游戏中的表现也会稍逊一筹。虽然这颗集成显卡显然足以应对视频播放等日常任务,但如果你喜欢玩游戏,我们建议你选择配备更强显卡的竞品机型。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8245 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6412 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3458 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 613 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 2466 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (76.3 - 227, n=5, last 2 years) | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 861, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (332 - 569, n=10) | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 | |
| Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU (235 - 257, n=5) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 | |
| Average of class Subnotebook (105 - 396, n=11, last 2 years) | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 | |
* ... smaller is better
《赛博朋克2077》极高画质帧率图表
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 172 | 158.4 | 55.2 | 21.8 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 133.5 | 72.4 | 85.4 | 77.8 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 74.1 | 37.6 | 27.2 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 45.6 | 35.4 | 33.2 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 198.1 | 72.5 | 64.1 | 54.6 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 34.3 | 25.6 | 22.1 | 21.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 (2023) | 38.7 | 29.2 | 25.1 | 21.2 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 69.3 | 64.1 | 48 | 15.1 |
排放与能耗
系统噪声
Noise level
| Idle |
| 24.1 / 24.1 / 24.1 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 45.4 / 49.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: | ||
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 16% | 5% | 10% | 1% | 5% | 12% | ||
| off / environment * (dB) | 24.1 | 24.2 -0% | 23.7 2% | 23.3 3% | 25.1 -4% | 23.1 4% | 25.7 -7% | 23 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * (dB) | 24.1 | 24.2 -0% | 23.7 2% | 23.3 3% | 25.1 -4% | 25.4 -5% | 25.7 -7% | 23 5% | |
| Idle Average * (dB) | 24.1 | 24.2 -0% | 23.7 2% | 23.3 3% | 25.1 -4% | 25.5 -6% | 25.7 -7% | 23 5% | |
| Idle Maximum * (dB) | 24.1 | 24.2 -0% | 23.7 2% | 23.3 3% | 25.1 -4% | 25.5 -6% | 25.7 -7% | 23.1 4% | |
| Load Average * (dB) | 45.4 | 41.3 9% | 30.5 33% | 42.9 6% | 29.3 35% | 44.4 2% | 30.2 33% | 30.8 32% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (dB) | 49.1 | 41.3 16% | 31.1 37% | 44.4 10% | 33.1 33% | 43.4 12% | 39.4 20% | 35.4 28% | |
| Load Maximum * (dB) | 49.1 | 51.7 -5% | 33.6 32% | 44.1 10% | 38.7 21% | 45.5 7% | 42.9 13% | 45.9 7% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.1 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-1.8 °C / -3.2 F).
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90 | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 4% | -1% | 9% | 3% | 17% | 10% | 16% | 6% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * (°C) | 43.5 | 40.9 6% | 43.7 -0% | 40.2 8% | 41.4 5% | 33.6 23% | 39.1 10% | 37.8 13% | 44.1 -1% |
| Maximum Bottom * (°C) | 47.1 | 47.2 -0% | 46.9 -0% | 44.2 6% | 44.6 5% | 28.8 39% | 35.7 24% | 38.6 18% | 42.4 10% |
| Idle Upper Side * (°C) | 25.5 | 24.5 4% | 25.8 -1% | 22.8 11% | 24.9 2% | 25.2 1% | 25.2 1% | 21.2 17% | 23.7 7% |
| Idle Bottom * (°C) | 25.6 | 24 6% | 26.3 -3% | 23.4 9% | 25.5 -0% | 24.6 4% | 24.9 3% | 21.4 16% | 23.8 7% |
* ... smaller is better
演讲者
Zenbook S14 的音响系统保持不变,依然提供出色的音质。
Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 17%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 23%, worst was 134%
功耗与电池续航时间
新款 Zenbook S14 即使配备了更亮的 OLED 屏幕,但在空闲状态下的能效仍比其前代“Lunar Lake”机型更高。在满载状态下,我们测得功耗最高可达 87 瓦,随后迅速稳定在约 48 瓦。 我们收到的德国评测机未随附电源适配器,但欧洲以外地区的机型均配备68W适配器,这显然不够用。由于CPU的功耗上限较高,在峰值负载情况下,功耗将始终超过电源供应器的承载能力,从而导致电池电量耗尽。这种情况并不理想。
较低的功耗以及更大的 77 Wh 电池(此前为 72 Wh)共同提升了电池续航时间。在 150 尼特的亮度下,我们的 Wi-Fi 测试持续时间超过 16 小时,因此比之前延长了约 2 小时。 在最大亮度下,续航时间几乎相同,均在10小时左右。
| Off / Standby | |
| Idle | |
| Load |
|
Key:
min: | |
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA Ultra 9 386H, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BTW, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA X2E-88-100, X2-90, Micron 2600 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QHK, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Ultra X9 388H, Arc B390 Panther Lake iGPU, , OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, Samsung PM9C1 MZVL8512HELU, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, SK hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X182N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Ultra 5 338H, Arc B370 Panther Lake iGPU, YMTC PC411-1TB, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.6" | Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Ultra 7 355, Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 PTL, WD PC SN7100S SDFPMSL-512G-1101, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 M5 10-Core, M5 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6" | Average Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -30% | -11% | -8% | -1% | -21% | -63% | 13% | 8% | -6% | -26% | |
| Idle Minimum * (Watt) | 2.3 | 4.7 -104% | 5.1 -122% | 2.5 -9% | 3.7 -61% | 3.2 -39% | 6.8 -196% | 1.6 30% | 1.8 22% | 2.75 ? -20% | 3.76 ? -63% |
| Idle Average * (Watt) | 4.6 | 7.1 -54% | 6.2 -35% | 5.1 -11% | 5.2 -13% | 3.9 15% | 8.2 -78% | 3.7 20% | 9.3 -102% | 5.03 ? -9% | 6.54 ? -42% |
| Idle Maximum * (Watt) | 5 | 7.4 -48% | 6.9 -38% | 5.8 -16% | 5.4 -8% | 12.3 -146% | 9.1 -82% | 3.9 22% | 9.4 -88% | 6.51 ? -30% | 7.89 ? -58% |
| Load Average * (Watt) | 45.9 | 39.6 14% | 38.7 16% | 49.8 -8% | 26.2 43% | 36.5 20% | 40.4 12% | 36 22% | 29.4 36% | 40.6 ? 12% | 42 ? 8% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * (Watt) | 46.1 | 31.4 32% | 28.6 38% | 55.1 -20% | 42.7 7% | 50.6 -10% | 66 -43% | 47.7 -3% | 17.7 62% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * (Watt) | 48.1 | 65.3 -36% | 33.1 31% | 55 -14% | 47.4 1% | 51.1 -6% | 66.1 -37% | 50.9 -6% | 18.9 61% | ||
| Load Maximum * (Watt) | 87 | 101.8 -17% | 60 31% | 68 22% | 63.5 27% | 69 21% | 100.2 -15% | 80 8% | 30.4 65% | 73.7 ? 15% | 64.8 ? 26% |
* ... smaller is better
功耗 赛博朋克 / 压力测试
外接显示器的功耗
电池续航时间
Notebookcheck 评分
Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA
- 07/18/2026 v8
Andreas Osthoff
潜在竞争对手对比
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asus ZenBook S14 UX5406AA Intel Core Ultra 9 386H ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,699.99 ASUS Zenbook 14 AI PC OLED T... 2. $1,599.99 ASUS Zenbook S 16 AI Laptop ... 3. $1,099.99 ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED Touchsc... List Price: 1899€ | 1.2 kg | 12.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook A14 UX3704NA Qualcomm Snapdragon X2 Elite X2E-88-100 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno X2-90 ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,049.00 ASUS Zenbook A14 14" FHD+ OL... 2. $1,469.99 ASUS Zenbook A14 Iceland Gra... 3. $799.99 ASUS Zenbook A14 Laptop 14" ... | 992 g | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
| Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1999€ | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| HP OmniBook Ultra 14 Core Ultra X9 Intel Core Ultra X9 388H ⎘ Intel Arc B390 12 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: List Price: 2800 USD | 1.3 kg | 10.7 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 14 940XHA Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1699€ | 1.2 kg | 11.6 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Ultra 14IPH11 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1700 USD | 978 g | 13.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
| Honor MagicBook Pro 14 2026 Intel Core Ultra 5 338H ⎘ Intel Arc B370 10 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: | 1.4 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.60" 3120x2080 257 PPI OLED | |
| Dell XPS 14 Core Ultra 7 355 Intel Core Ultra 7 355 ⎘ Intel Graphics 4 Xe3 Panther Lake iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,699.99 Dell XPS 14 Premium Laptop D... 2. $2,049.00 Dell XPS 14 9440 14.5" Noteb... 3. $2,199.99 Dell Premium 16 (Previously ... List Price: 1600 USD | 1.5 kg | 15.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
| Apple MacBook Air 13 M5 Apple M5 10-Core ⎘ Apple M5 8-Core GPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1199€ | 1.2 kg | 11.3 mm | 13.60" 2560x1664 225 PPI IPS |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.




































































