结论--如果你有足够的办公桌空间，它将为你提供超大空间
2025 Yoga Book 9i 已进入第三年，与前几代产品相比有了显著升级。这次它的处理器速度更快，同时两块屏幕更大，刷新率提高了一倍，带来了更快、更宽敞的用户体验。更令人印象深刻的是，尽管进行了各种改进，Yoga Book 9i 14 并没有明显比 13 英寸的 Yoga Book 9i 厚或重。
上述升级对于那些不满意去年酷睿 U 处理器的强力用户来说可能是件好事，但新的高要求硬件对整体电池续航时间造成了影响。与去年的方案相比，使用两个屏幕将减少几个小时的运行时间，而处理器本身也可能受益于更强大的冷却解决方案，以减少一些性能节流。选择像ThinkVision 14 这样的便携式外接显示器这样的便携式外接显示器可以满足 Yoga Book 9i 14 所提供的大量功能，而无需花费超过 2000 美元购买新系统。这并不是一个噱头设计，因为第二块屏幕可以在特定的使用情况或场景下派上用场，但与传统的蛤壳式或可转换式系统相比，它的众多配件和可拆卸键盘肯定还是让人感觉笨重。
Pros
+ 重量与去年的较小机型几乎相同
+ 双 120 赫兹高质量 OLED 触摸屏
+ 更快的酷睿 H 系列处理器取代了酷睿 U 处理器
+ 纤薄美观的镁合金设计
Cons
- 可拆卸键盘和支架携带起来可能会很笨重
- 电池续航能力有待提高
- CPU Turbo Boost 功能有限
- 难以维修
$2,699.00
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 13.3" 2.8K Dual Screen OLED Touch Laptop - Intel Core i7-1355U with 16GB Memory - 512GB SSD - Tidal Teal ((512GB - China Model No Warranty)
2025 款 14 英寸 Yoga Book 9 14 接替了去年的 2024 款 13 英寸 Yoga Book 9 13，屏幕尺寸更大，CPU 也采用了新的酷睿 H 处理器，取代了旧机型上较慢的酷睿 U 处理器。除此以外，它的机身设计和配件都与之前的产品非常相似，因此我们对 2024 型号的许多评论 对 2024 型号的评论仍然适用.
我们的测试机搭载了 Core Ultra 7 255H Arrow Lake CPU 和 16GB RAM，售价略低于 2100 美元，而更高端的 SKU 则搭载了 Core Ultra 9 285H，RAM 增加了一倍。
更多联想评测：
规格
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 (Yoga Book Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H 16 x 4.4 - 5.1 GHz, 62 W PL2 / Short Burst, 32 W PL1 / Sustained, Arrow Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc Graphics 140T, Core: 2150 MHz, LPDDR5x, 320.0.101.6452
Memory
16 GB
, LPDDR5x-8400, Soldered
Display
14.00 inch 16:10, 2880 x 1800 pixel 243 PPI, 10-point capacitive, native pen support, LEN140WQ+, 2x, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Arrow Lake-H PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, 1024 GB
Weight
1.214 kg, Power Supply: 179 g
Price
0 2100
Amazon
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
案例
与去年的 13 英寸机型相比，14 英寸屏幕尺寸更大，因此占地面积也更大。即便如此，尽管屏幕尺寸不同，但两代产品的厚度和重量竟然没有太大差别。不锈钢镁合金外观的回归给人留下了相似的印象。
| 机型重量 | 键盘重量 | 综合重量 |
| 1214 g | 340 g | 1554 g |
连接性
端口选项与 2023 和 2024 型号相同。所有三个 USB-C 端口都具有 Thunderbolt 4 连接功能。
交流
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø900 (834-966)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1215 (1063-1322)
网络摄像头
配备红外和电子快门的 500 万像素网络摄像头保持不变。
14.9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
22 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
17 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
维护
由于设计独特，该机型不容易维修或保养。不过，联想提供了官方维修手册为敢于冒险保修的用户提供。
可持续性
USB-C 适配器、扬声器外壳和电池组由多达 90% 的消费后再生塑料制成。
包装不含塑料。
配件和保修
包装盒包括对开式底座、保护便携套、无线耳塞、无线鼠标、触控笔和无线键盘。
如果在美国购买，制造商通常提供一年保修。
输入设备
键盘
与去年的机型相比，无线键盘的键入体验和操作方式没有任何变化。不过，由于屏幕尺寸增大，键盘变长了，增加了一列辅助键，用于快速切换电源配置文件、音频、阅读器模式、连接的无线设备和用户定义的快捷键。
触摸板
触摸板体验与 Yoga Book 9 13 相同。它的默认虚拟尺寸（11 x 6 厘米）可以扩展到整个触摸屏的宽度（31 x 6 厘米）。虚拟鼠标按键在按下时会伴有微弱的振动反馈，这与智能手机上的按键很相似，但也很容易误触。
显示屏
触摸屏不仅更大，而且亮度也比去年的机型更高，可更好地支持高达 750 尼特的 HDR。原生刷新率也翻了一番，从 60 Hz 提高到 120 Hz，带来更流畅的用户体验。
否则，当设置为 SDR 模式时，最大亮度将被限制在约 400 尼特。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
LEN140WQ+, 2x tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 406.7 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 398.3 cd/m² Minimum: 4.7 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 381.7 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.85, calibrated: 0.61
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
92.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 LEN140WQ+, 2x, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI AUO8FB5, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 BOE NV140WU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | 1% | -13% | -14% | -3% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 99.9 | 99.7 0% | 99.8 0% | 76.7 -23% | 76.5 -23% | 98.4 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 98.2 -2% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 92.2 | 97 5% | 95.4 3% | 78.2 -15% | 76 -18% | 86.7 -6% |
| Response Times | -162% | -154% | -5240% | -4039% | -40% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.6 ? | 1.88 ? -213% | 1.83 ? -205% | 49.2 ? -8100% | 35.65 ? -5842% | 1.51 ? -152% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1 ? | 2.1 ? -110% | 2.03 ? -103% | 24.8 ? -2380% | 23.35 ? -2235% | 1.36 ? -36% |
| PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 60 ? | 60 ? | 480 ? | ||
| PWM Amplitude * | 43 | 14 67% | ||||
| Screen | -44% | -47% | -125% | -40% | -12% | |
| Brightness middle | 381.7 | 362.6 -5% | 359.7 -6% | 572 50% | 333 -13% | 359 -6% |
| Brightness | 398 | 368 -8% | 363 -9% | 541 36% | 326 -18% | 362 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 94 | 97 3% | 98 4% | 78 -17% | 85 -10% | 98 4% |
| Black Level * | 0.2 | 0.27 | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.93 | 4.66 -59% | 4.51 -54% | 4.19 -43% | 2.46 16% | 1.2 59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.93 | 7.25 -22% | 7.05 -19% | 8.65 -46% | 4.58 23% | 3.2 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.61 | 0.56 8% | 2.11 -246% | 1.31 -115% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 2.6 -225% | 2.4 -200% | 5.65 -606% | 2.1 -163% | 2.1 -163% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.18 101% | 2.45 90% | 2.2 100% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6404 101% | 6055 107% | 6112 106% | 5959 109% | 6578 99% | 6433 101% |
| Contrast | 2860 | 1233 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -68% /
-52% | -67% /
-54% | -1793% /
-949% | -1364% /
-700% | -18% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 43 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8429 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能
测试条件
在运行以下基准测试之前，我们将 Windows 设置为性能模式。
处理器
酷睿至尊 7 255H 酷睿至尊 7 255H比 酷睿至尊 7 155U快近 2 倍。尽管如此，由于 Turbo Boost 的持续性有限，正如我们下面的 CineBench R15 xT 循环测试结果所示，性能在受压时会下降 24%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H: Ø2165 (2075.66-2834.87)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U: Ø1322 (1278.32-1504.72)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø1153 (695.41-1206.27)
HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: Ø1351 (1333.02-1503.76)
Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U: Ø1385 (1049.21-1643.86)
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H: Ø1957 (1642.78-2796.81)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (15293 - 22382, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (77364 - 94573, n=3) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (3612 - 4671, n=3) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (61468 - 68308, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (7245 - 8034, n=3) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (40666 - 49716, n=3) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (58402 - 77081, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (922 - 1217, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (8299 - 12284, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (50511 - 64588, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
压力测试
与去年的 13 英寸机型相比，14 英寸机型在游戏时的运行温度要低一些，但当 CPU 功耗达到 100%时，情况则恰恰相反。需要注意的是，在游戏时，CPU 封装的功率在 25 W 和 32 W 之间循环，这并不理想，因为更稳定的性能才是更可取的。
| CPU 平均时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
| 系统闲置 | -- | -- | 55 |
| Prime95 压力 | 2.1 | -- | 74 |
| Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.3 | 1350 | 82 |
| 赛博朋克 2077》压力 | 0.6 | 2150 | 69 |
系统性能
PCMark 分数远高于去年的 Yoga Book 9 13，这主要归功于全新集成的 Arc 140T GPU，它比 Iris Xe 96 EUs 跑得更快。
Performance Rating: Percent
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| Performance Rating | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (7666 - 7678, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10766 - 11556, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (9171 - 9243, n=2) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (11445 - 12442, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1923 - 2018, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1830 - 1862, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2169 - 2396, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1491 - 1574, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (310 - 327, n=2) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (291 - 317, n=3) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (431 - 455, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 Score | 7666 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (76316 - 105731, n=3) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (80907 - 83762, n=3) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (77779 - 82303, n=3) | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Average Intel Core Ultra 7 255H (110.1 - 142.4, n=3) | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
| HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI | |
| Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
如下图所示，在进行 DiskSpd 读取循环测试时，三星硬盘出现了性能节流问题。测试刚开始一分钟，传输速率就在 2600 MB/s 和 6000 MB/s 之间循环。
Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
6170 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
4548 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
535.3 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
453.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
3341 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
3337 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
67.32 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
145 MB/s
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø3941 (2545.73-6150.67)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 ; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4994 (4062.6-5213.37)
图形处理器性能
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12521 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 36844 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8153 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 4421 points | |
Help | ||
* ... smaller is better
F1 24 | Dota 2 Reborn | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | X-Plane 11.11 | Strange Brigade | Baldur's Gate 3 | Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T: Ø21.1 (18.8-21.8)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 103.5 | 68.8 | 53.6 | 80.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 72.9 | 42 | 27.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.1 | 43.2 | 38.1 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 160.5 | 61.6 | 56.6 | 48.6 |
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 35.6 | 28.4 | 25.3 | 24.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 37.3 | 30.4 | 26.6 | 24.5 |
| F1 24 (2024) | 76 | 69.4 |
排放量
系统噪音
由于采用了速度更快、要求更高的酷睿 H 系列 CPU，风扇噪音明显高于去年的机型。当负载较高时，内部风扇的转速也会更快。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
| HDD |
| 25.9 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 39.1 / 44.5 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Arc 140T, Ultra 7 255H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-1T00-1006 | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 165U, Micron 2550 512GB | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 13% | 5% | 14% | 5% | 3% | |
| off / environment * | 23.9 | 23.3 3% | 22.6 5% | 23 4% | 23.03 4% | 23.6 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 23.3 3% | 23.1 3% | 23 4% | 23.53 2% | 23.6 1% |
| Idle Average * | 23.9 | 23.3 3% | 23.1 3% | 23 4% | 23.53 2% | 23.6 1% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 24.6 -3% | 23.1 3% | 23 4% | 23.53 2% | 23.6 1% |
| Load Average * | 39.1 | 26.2 33% | 38.6 1% | 27.14 31% | 38.54 1% | 39.8 -2% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 42 | 31.65 25% | 38.2 9% | 39.8 5% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 44.5 | 27.3 39% | 38.3 14% | 31.65 29% | 38.21 14% | 39.8 11% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 27.3 | 34.2 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
底座两侧的热点温度略高于 38 摄氏度，这与大多数只有一个屏幕的典型蛤壳式或敞篷车并无不同。换句话说，尽管设计独特，但系统并没有明显的升温感觉。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.1 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 30.3 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.1 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -0% | 5% | 10% | 4% | 8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 38.2 | 39.2 -3% | 37 3% | 36 6% | 41.2 -8% | 35.3 8% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 38.8 | 41 -6% | 37.2 4% | 41 -6% | 45 -16% | 47.2 -22% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 32.6 | 32.2 1% | 31.4 4% | 26 20% | 27.2 17% | 24.8 24% |
| Idle Bottom * | 33.8 | 31.6 7% | 31.6 7% | 27 20% | 26.2 22% | 26.2 22% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 20%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理
耗电量
由于屏幕更大，CPU 从酷睿 U 系列换成了速度更快的酷睿 H 系列，因此整体功耗高于 2024 Yoga Book 9i。电池寿命也因此受到负面影响。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.17 / 0.65 Watt |
| Idle | 9.9 / 11.6 / 23.2 Watt |
| Load |
58.5 / 70.1 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, , OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-1T00-1006, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, Micron 2550 512GB, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00, OLED, 1920x1200, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 18% | 10% | 37% | 43% | 28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.9 | 7.1 28% | 6.9 30% | 2.9 71% | 2.23 77% | 4.1 59% |
| Idle Average * | 11.6 | 9.1 22% | 11.6 -0% | 8.2 29% | 5.36 54% | 8.2 29% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.2 | 18.4 21% | 20.8 10% | 8.6 63% | 6.8 71% | 8.7 62% |
| Load Average * | 58.5 | 51.3 12% | 55 6% | 39.6 32% | 51.2 12% | 56.7 3% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 56.6 | 36.4 36% | 34.6 39% | 47 17% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 58.5 | 41.9 28% | 29.5 50% | 48.7 17% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 70.1 | 65.5 7% | 68.1 3% | 70 -0% | 69.9 -0% | 65.1 7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.5 | 44.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø60.8 (44.5-70.1)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø50.9 (38.8-68.1)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.25 (8.5-12.4)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø7.65 (6.98-10.5)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR 150cd: Ø58.5 (47-62.8)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø56.8 (49.3-70)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø45.4 (37.8-67.3)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø69.9 (69.9-70.1)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø55 (52.1-65.6)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø54.2 (51.6-59.7)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø46.1 (37.7-49.8)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø8.85 (8.12-11.3)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.34 (8.8-13.6)
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T; Cyberpunk 2077 FHD ultra no FSR (external Monitor): Ø56.6 (44.8-61.6)
电池寿命
如果两个屏幕都处于活动状态，无线局域网的运行时间可能短至 6 小时。虽然电池容量比去年的机型增加了 10%（88 Wh 对 80 Wh），但增加的容量不足以弥补硬件要求的提高。
| Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Ultra 7 255H, Arc 140T, 88 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 80 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, 68 Wh | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Ultra 7 165U, Graphics 4-Core, 57 Wh | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, 75 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 66% | 60% | 200% | 80% | 82% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 367 | 608 66% | 586 60% | 1102 200% | 660 80% | 667 82% |
| Reader / Idle | 680 | |||||
| Load | 219 | 128 | ||||
| H.264 | 1234 | 741 | 1015 |
笔记本检查评级
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10
- 06/04/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Convertible - Weighted Average
Total Sustainability Score: Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 83.4%  | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 14IAH10 Intel Core Ultra 7 255H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,699.00 | 1.2 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
2. 87% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $1,699.00 List Price: 2000 USD | 1.4 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED |
3. 86.4% v7 (old)  | Lenovo Yoga Book 9i 2-in-1 Dual Screen Intel Core i7-1355U ⎘ Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,699.00 List Price: 2000 USD | 1.6 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED |
4. 89.9%  | HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14 AI Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1000 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,812.50 List Price: 2889 Euro | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
5. 87.7%  | Dell Latitude 7450 2-in-1 Intel Core Ultra 7 165U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,794.98 List Price: 2279 USD | 1.5 kg | 17.1 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS |
6. 86.5%  | Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,699.99 List Price: 2099€ | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
